Examining The Most Hated Bull Market Ever

Tyler Durden's picture

Authored by Lance Roberts via RealInvestmehtAdvice.com,

From last week:

“The seemingly “impervious” advance since the election last November, has had an interesting “stair step” pattern with each advance commencing from a breakout of a several month 3%-ish consolidation range. Furthermore, each advance then pushes to a 3-standard deviation extreme, black circles, of the 50-dma before beginning the next consolidation trading range.”

The last leg higher has been directly responsive to the ramp up in the political “marketing surge” surrounding “tax cuts and tax reform.” With the House having already passed their respective budget resolutions, late Thursday, the Senate passed a budget blueprint for the next fiscal year. With both of the “budget resolutions” in place, it was seen as clearing a hurdle to the goal of overhauling the tax code.

This is not new, of course, as the entire rally for the markets since the election has been driven by hopes of lower taxes, despite disaster, floods, fires and Central Bank threats of liquidity extraction.

The bulls are clearly in charge which keeps us allocated to towards equity risk currently.

Do not be mistaken, this “rally” IS all about tax cuts. Despite many who are suggesting this has been a “rational rise” due to strong earnings growth, that is simply not the case as shown below. (I only use “reported earnings” which includes all the “bad stuff.” Any analysis using “operating earnings” is misleading.)

Since 2014, the stock market has risen (capital appreciation only) by 35% while reported earnings growth has risen by a whopping 2%. A 2% growth in earnings over the last 3-years hardly justifies a 33% premium over earnings. 

Of course, even reported earnings is somewhat misleading due to the heavy use of share repurchases to artificially inflate reported earnings on a per share basis. However, corporate profits after tax give us a better idea of what profits actually were since that is the amount left over after those taxes were paid.

Again we see the same picture of a 32% premium over a 3% cumulative growth in corporate profits after tax. There is little justification to be found to support the idea that earnings growth is the main driver behind asset prices currently.

We can also use the data above to construct a valuation measure of price divided by corporate profits after tax. As with all valuation measures we have discussed as of late, and forward return expectations from such levels, the P/CPATAX ratio just hit the second highest level in history.

The reality, of course, is that investors are simply chasing asset prices higher as exuberance overtakes logic and their actions prove the case.  According to data from FactSet, stock-based exchange-traded funds have seen nearly $16 billion in inflows over the past week, which represents an acceleration from recent positioning. Over the past month, about $31.3 billion has gone into stock-based ETFs. The chart below of data from ICI shows much of the same with monthly equity ETF inflows surging since the election.

The same is seen when we also add in equity mutual funds for a look at total equity asset flows.

Not surprisingly, those actions have been backed by their massive elevation in bullish sentiment.

As UMich noted:

“Consumer sentiment surged in early October, reaching its highest level since the start of 2004. The October gain was broadly shared, occurring among all age and income subgroups and across all partisan viewpoints.


There is an unmistakable sense among consumers that economic prospects are now about as ‘good as it gets.'”

Most hated bull market ever…hardly.

Historically speaking, you only witness such exuberance in the latter stages of an expansion, not the beginnings of one. The latest survey indicates that consumers do not anticipate an economic downturn anytime in the foreseeable future, which from a contrarian perspective may be a clear warning sign.

Clearly, the expected benefits of tax cuts and reforms is leading investors to overpay for something today they are hoping will become fairly valued tomorrow. In other words, instead of prices catching “down” to market fundamentals, investors are hoping fundamentals will “catch up” to prices.

Unfortunately, there isn’t a previous case in history where this has been the case.

Also, when we look at 20-year trailing returns, there is sufficient historical evidence to suggest total, real returns, will decline towards zero over the next 3-years from 7% annualized currently. 

(These are trailing 20-year total real returns, not forward)

Re-read that last sentence again and look closely at the chart above. From current valuation levels, the annualized return on stocks by the end of the current 20-year cycle will be close to 0%. A decline in the next 3-years of only 30%, the average drawdown during a recession, will achieve that goal. 

For investors, this is crucially important. In the article “Apathy & The Death Of Your Financial Goals,” I discussed the reality of the damage caused by market drawdowns. As I stated:

“Crashes matter, a lot.” 

While investors may “get back to even,” eventually, following a crash, the shortfall from their actual financial goal continues to build.

This is why using some method of risk management, such as a simple moving average crossover, can help alleviate some of the financial damage caused by drawdowns.

  • YES! You will miss out on some gains in the market.
  • YES! Sometimes you will be “stopped out” and have to “buy back in.” 
  • YES! You will be much more successful in obtaining your financial goals long-term.

After all, isn’t that why you invest in the first place?

What I can assure you of is that you WILL be wrong from time to time and you WILL lose money. But that is the inherent nature of investing. It is a “RISK” based endeavor.

However, I can absolutely guarantee that trying to “passively index” in the current market environment will absolutely wind up screwing up your long-term goals.

Think about it this way. IF investing was as easy as just buying a bunch of stuff and sitting on it, then why are so many Americans dependent on Social Security for retirement? Via Jared Dillian:

  • 19.7% of retirees get 100% of their income from Social Security.
  • A full third (33.4%) depend on it for 90% of their income.
  • And 61.1% get at least half their income from Social Security.

The federal government’s unfunded 75-year liability for Social Security and Medicare combined is $46.7 trillion.

Are you absolutely sure you want to rely on the Government for your retirement?

Think about it the next time someone tells you to just “buy and hold.”

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
DoctOZ's picture

Well that says it all. As more production moves out of America the doom is certain. 

dicksburnt's picture

Someone mention choom? we can move the doom from American with a little choom.  Everybody will be so fucking high doom will be laughed at and not tolerated.  Oh wait, that is today's America without choom.  We have FED, FED is better than choom, all hail FED.

Five Star's picture

Nearly the fewest Americans on record own stocks. It may not be the most hated but its the least particpated in.


FreeShitter's picture

Wealth transfer by design.

_RRR_'s picture

no, buy all the things. When they say "be cautious" they want to buy the stawks you own. So buy till DOW goes 1 million then exit as a rich guy. But if then again Buffett is telling you DOW goes 10 Million just stay in.

easy street, ain't it

moneybots's picture

"In other words, instead of prices catching “down” to market fundamentals, investors are hoping fundamentals will “catch up” to prices."


A market that goes up on the basis of financial fraud, declines on the exposure of financial truth.

Boom always ends in bust.

spastic_colon's picture

this market appears to be much more reminiscient to the period from '47-'67 than it does '37.............

pump and dump's picture

It's like playing with fire. Sometimes you get burned and sometimes you don't.

ebworthen's picture

ETF's = gas on the fire.

Imagine all those workaday tax-mules in State and Federal Government or others with reliable income plowing money into 401K's and retirement plans weekly or bi-weekly. 

These are the people who will be burnt to a crisp by Wall Street and this Ponzi of a "market".

Juggernaut x2's picture

It will be glorious when this all blows up on Trump's watch especially after the Orange Idiot has hooked his wagon  to this star

whatswhat1@yahoo.com's picture

There's a bus coming in ten minutes..........be under it.

Seasmoke's picture

This is the Harvey Weinstein market. Everyone knows it's a fraud but no one does anything to stop it. 

adr's picture

That's because Weinstein took actresses from no name hostesses to Red Carpet stars. Now that they have their Oscar trophy, the stuff they did to get there can be blamed on Harvey. 

Everyone knew you could suck Harvey's cock and get into an Oscar winning picture. They did it willingly, further swelling the asshole's ego. 

Give 100 actresses the choice, suck a cock and get a role or refuse the cock and go back to waiting tables. The cock will be sucked 99 times. The 100th will come back a week later and let you fuck her in the ass to be a non speaking extra. 

This market is gaining profit by sucking Wall St cock. Everyone knows it, but they want the cash for doing nothing. So they'll wear the ball gag and get whipped by Goldman just to participate in the show. 

Scornd's picture

Ya but the real money is in human resources, ignore this

Running_Trillion's picture

Permabears such as lance blown the fuck out ;)

Don Sunset's picture

They keep changing the rules of this shell game.  Now let's change the tax rules so the game can be extended for years.

The fact is that there is way too much current and future debt that won't ever be paid for and this economy and the USG is being dragged down.

There is no new dawn awakening in America.  It is a dirty and corrupt ending that solidly settled in starting in 2009.

Nobody wants it to end this way and, thus, the frustration is ramping politically and socially.  Desperation is everywhere with blatant disrepect for leadership and authority.

I suspect that the end won't be a civil war.  It will be revolutionary war.

wintraiz's picture

We can rationalize why the market is not selling off all day long.  But the analysts from Shepwave are the one who have been calliing this rally. So, whatever.