The Biggest Ponzi In Human History

Tyler Durden's picture

Authored by Raul Ilargi Meijer via The Automatic Earth blog,

Here’s the story in a nutshell: Ultra low interest rates mark a shift away from people’s wealth residing in their savings and pension plans, and into to so-called wealth residing in their homes, which are bought with ever growing levels of debt. When interest rates rise, they will lose that so-called wealth.

It is grand theft auto on an unparalleled scale, and it’s a piece of genius, because while people are getting robbed in plain daylight, they actually think they’re winning. But as I wrote back in March of this year, home sales, and bubbles, are the only thing that keeps our economies humming.

We haven’t learned a thing since March, and we haven’t learned a thing for many years. People need a place to live, and they fall for the scheme hook line and sinker. Which in a way is a good thing because the economy would have been dead without that ignorance, but at the same time it’s not because it’s a temporary relief only and the end result will be all the more painful for it.

Whatever Yellen decides as per rates, or Draghi, it doesn’t really matter anymore, this sucker’s going down something awful. This is a global issue. Housing bubbles have been blown not only in the Anglosphere, though they are strong there, many other countries have them as well, Scandinavia, Netherlands, even Germany and France. It’s what ultra low rates do.

First, here’s what I said in March:

Our Economies Run On Housing Bubbles

What we have invented to keep big banks afloat for a while longer is ultra low interest rates, NIRP, ZIRP etc. They create the illusion of not only growth, but also of wealth. They make people think a home they couldn’t have dreamt of buying not long ago now fits in their ‘budget’. That is how we get them to sign up for ever bigger mortgages. And those in turn keep our banks from falling over.

 

Record low interest rates have become the only way that private banks can create new money, and stay alive (because at higher rates hardly anybody can afford a mortgage). It’s of course not just the banks that are kept alive, it’s the entire economy. Without the ZIRP rates, the mortgages they lure people into, and the housing bubbles this creates, the amount of money circulating in our economies would shrink so much and so fast the whole shebang would fall to bits.

 

That’s right: the survival of our economies today depends one on one on the existence of housing bubbles. No bubble means no money creation means no functioning economy.

What we should do in the short term is lower private debt levels (drastically, jubilee style), and temporarily raise public debt to encourage economic activity, aim for more and better jobs. But we’re doing the exact opposite: austerity measures are geared towards lowering public debt, while they cut the consumer spending power that makes up 60-70% of our economies. Meanwhile, housing bubbles raise private debt through the -grossly overpriced- roof.

 

This is today’s general economic dynamic. It’s exclusively controlled by the price of debt. However, as low interest rates make the price of debt look very low, the real price (there always is one, it’s just like thermodynamics) is paid beyond interest rates, beyond the financial markets even, it’s paid on Main Street, in the real economy. Where the quality of jobs, if not the quantity, has fallen dramatically, and people can only survive by descending ever deeper into ever more debt.

Australia’s housing boom has been a thing of beauty, with New Zealand, especially Wellington and Auckland, following close behind. UBS now says the Oz bubble is over. Prices are still rising quite a bit though.

Fresh New Zealand PM Jacinda Ardern has announced new policies to deter foreign buyers from purchasing more property in the country. She may not like what that does to the country’s economy. Most new Zealanders can no longer afford property in major centers, and forcing prices down this way will expose many present owners to margin calls and foreclosures.

Moreover, because Australian banks own their New Zealand peers, if the Aussie boom is really gone, these banks are going to get hit so hard they’ll take down New Zealand with them. Close your eyes and put your fingers in your ears.

Australia’s Housing Boom Is ‘Officially Over’

The housing boom that has seen Australian home prices more than double since the turn of the century is “officially over,” after data showed prices now flatlining, UBS said. National house prices were unchanged in October from September, while annual growth has slowed to 7% from more than 10% as recently as July, CoreLogic data released Wednesday showed. “There is now a persistent and sharp slowdown unfolding,” UBS economists led by George Tharenou said in a report. “This suggests a tightening of financial conditions is unfolding, which we expect to weigh on consumption growth via a fading household-wealth effect.”

 

An end to Australia’s property boom will be welcome news for first-time buyers, who have struggled to break into the market after surging prices propelled Sydney past London and New York to be the second-most expensive housing market. Less impressed may be property investors, already squeezed by regulatory lending curbs that drove up mortgage rates. The cooling housing market may encourage the Reserve Bank to keep interest rates at a record low. A rate hike would be undesirable as it would put further downward pressure on dwelling prices, said Diana Mousina, senior economist at AMP Capital Investors.

But perhaps a bigger, and more surprising, story is shaping up in the US. Looks like the American housing bubble is back with a vengeance. It’s always amusing to see claims that this is due to a lack of supply. The real problem is not supply, but artificially fabricated demand. Fabricated by low rates. Though the NAR is not known for its accuracy (it’s a PR firm), this Bloomberg piece is still relevant.

Homes Are Getting Snapped Up at the Fastest Pace in 30 Years

Homes are sitting on the market for the shortest time in 30 years, according to an annual report on homebuyers and sellers published today by the National Association of Realtors. The typical home spent just three weeks on the market, according to the report, which focused on about 8,000 homebuyers who purchased their home in the year ending in June. That was down from four weeks in the year ending June 2016 and 11 weeks in 2012, when the U.S. housing market was still reeling from the foreclosure crisis.

 

It was the shortest time since the NAR report began including data on how long homes spend on the market, in 1987. Buyers are snapping up homes quickly at a time when for-sale listings are in short supply, forcing them to compete. The number of available properties declined in September, according to NAR’s monthly report on existing home sales, marking the 28th consecutive month of year-on-year decline in inventory. In addition to moving fast, buyers also had to pony up to close the deal. 42% of buyers paid at least the listing price, the highest share since the NAR survey started keeping track in 2007.

Where the fine bubble plan runs astray is in affordability. Ultra low rates can encourage sales, but that also raises prices, and if and when wages do not keep up there must be a point where you hit a wall. In the US that wall is fast approaching, suggests Tyler Durden:

US Homes Have Never Been More Unaffordable

Just under a year ago, US home prices finally surpassed their prior all time highs, one decade after the 2006 bubble… and haven’t looked back since. Which, all else equal, would be great news for America, where the bulk of middle-class wealth is not in the stock market contrary to conventional wisdom, but in its biggest, and most illiquid asset-cum-investment: one’s home. There is just one problem: while house prices are once again hitting new all time highs every month, household incomes have failed to keep up; in fact, as the Political Calculations blog shows, in the past two years there has been a distinct trend in home affordability, or lack thereof.

[..] starting in September 2015, the TTM average median new home sale price in the U.S. has been rising at an average rate of $906 per month. That’s the good news; the bad news is that in terms of affordability, the ratio of the trailing twelve month averages of median new home sale prices to median household income in the U.S. has risen to an all time high of 5.454, which following revisions in the data for new home sale prices, was recorded in July 2017. The initial value for September 2017 is 5.437. In other words, the median new home in the US has never been more unaffordable in terms of current income.

Never more unaffordable is a bold statement, but it’s probably correct. The graph only goes back as far as 1987, but that should do. Another angle on the same issue, also from Tyler:

Home Prices In All US Cities Grow Faster Than Wages… And Then There’s Seattle

US national home prices are up 6.07% YoY in August – the fastest rate since June 2014. We note this data is for August – before the hurricanes. Seattle (up 13.2%), Las Vegas (up 8.6%), and San Diego (up 7.8%) were the top three cities in terms of year-over-year price appreciation; all cities showed gains of at least 3%. Pushing home prices to a new record high…

 

“Home-price increases appear to be unstoppable,” David Blitzer, chairman of the S&P index committee, said in a statement. “At the same time, “measures of affordability are beginning to slide, indicating that the pool of buyers is shrinking, and the Fed’s interest-rate hikes are likely to push mortgage rates higher over time, “removing a key factor supporting rising home prices,” he said.

There’s nothing anyone can do to raise wages, and while Yellen may claim not to understand why wages and inflation refuse to shine, it’s not that hard. Whatever is called a job these days is America didn’t use to be labeled that. We’ve all been conned into redefining what a job is, but the benefits and security and all that have still vanished. So what can people afford? They can’t even afford to rent anymore:

Renting In The US Has Never Been More Unaffordable

Over the weekend, when looking at the record high ratio in median new home sale prices to household incomes in the US, we concluded that US homes have never been more unaffordable for the average American. What about renting? Isn’t it intuitive that if buying a house has never been more expensive, then at least renting should be cheap(er). Unfortunately no, because not only is renting not cheap(er) in either absolute or relative terms, but when observed through the prism of the only thing that matters, namely disposable income, renting – just like buying a house – has never been more unaffordable.

Now remember what I said before: millions upon millions see their savings and pensions melt away before their eyes, while at the same time they are forced to spend ever more on housing costs. And when that scheme hits the wall, the economy will remember it’s alive only because of the housing bubble, and then croak. Leaving both renters and owners without jobs and eventually places to live.

A lovely example of where all this is heading comes from a Statista report on the Netherlands 3 weeks ago. The Dutch have tons of interest-only mortgages, just like the Australians, but you can take this graph as a general model for what many of not most countries that have low interest rates and thus housing bubbles, will face:

Heading Towards A Mortgage Crisis In The Netherlands?

Bank it or bust. In October 2017, the Dutch Central Bank (DNB) issued a warning on mortgages in the Netherlands. They claimed that almost 55% of the aggregate Dutch mortgage debt consisted of interest-only and investment-based mortgage loans, which did not involve any contractual repayments during the loan term. As prices in the the European housing, or residential real estate, market increase and mortgage rates decrease due the Asset Purchase Programme (APP) of the ECB, interest-only mortgages became more and more popular.

 

In addition, the Dutch government encouraged home ownership for many years, offering tax exemptions on Dutch mortgage payments alongside other benefits for homebuyers in the Netherlands. Consequently, the total mortgage debt from households in the Netherlands increased from approximately €548 billion in 2006 to approximately €664 billion in 2016. However, the debts must still be repaid when the interest-only mortgages expire.

 

The DNB stated there could be a risk that the households in question may not have the means to repay their debts before or when their loans expire, risking a new mortgage crisis. Lenders, they say, must actively alert customers to this risk and help them find a suitable solution. Unfortunately, the value of mortgages in 2017 is forecasted to increase with approximately 3.9% compared to 2016.

The debt accumulation is insane. Combine that with the wholesale erosion of savings and pensions, and you have an economy with either a lot of foreclosures and homelessness in its future, or a bankrupt banking system. More people should, before purchasing property, be shown graphs like that. But that would kill the bubble scheme, wouldn’t it?

Is there a way out of this mess? Well, there is in theory. Just grow your economy, and your wages etc., by let’s say 6.8% per year for decades on end. Problem with that is it’s possible only in a country like China, and that only because whatever Beijing says the growth rate is, goes. But that doesn’t make it real. Still, it entices Chinese grandmas into buying apartments.

What Beijing doesn’t tell them, or us, is how much debt the grandmas have gone into by now to buy all those new nice and shiny apartments. But since stocks and bonds are still not their thing, it’s all they have. Property in China is all on red. In the US about one quarter of household wealth is in housing, in China it’s three quarters.

 

So no, there’s no way out. My best guess is the first country to deal with this in an aggressive manner will be the -relative- winner. All others are goners. The governments and politicians who’ve lured their people into this biggest Ponzi in human history will probably be long gone when the house comes down, and if they know what’s good for them will have moved to some street with no name in a land far away.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
redmudhooch's picture

Things are not getting better.....

Ha’aretz: Adelson-funded Israel lobby group IAC could soon rival AIPAC

https://israelpalestinenews.org/haaretz-adelson-funded-israel-lobby-grou...

Thousands will gather in the U.S. capital this Friday for one of the largest Israel-related events of the year – the annual conference of the Israeli-American Council.

The event will mark 10 years since the IAC’s foundation, and will also be the nonprofit’s first conference under U.S. President Donald Trump, whose campaign was supported by tens of millions of dollars from the IAC’s most prominent backer, gambling tycoon Sheldon Adelson.

zuuma's picture

But what if you own your house free & clear?
Winning?

GunnerySgtHartman's picture

Yes, winning - from the perspective of not being a debt slave.

However, when this goes belly-up, the debt slaves will start losing their houses and the values will go down, taking the home values of smart, debt-free people with them.

Arnold's picture

And you local governance will rape you in taxation, to make up shortfalls.

Beam Me Up Scotty's picture

"But what if you own your house free & clear?"

You might be a bit better off than most.  BUT, what is your share of the national debt???  20 Trillion divided by 330 million people.  You do the math.  Or use the real national debt number including all of the unfunded liabilities divided by 330 million people.  You do the math again.  So still a debt slave.

Arnold's picture

In my position of King of the Dotards, I let machines do the maff.

http://www.nationaldebtclocks.org/debtclock/unitedstates

crazytechnician's picture

Actually , the largest Ponzi scheme in human history is the US Dollar.

YUNOSELL's picture

If I kill myself they can't extract any more wealth from me.....hahaha..... I win!!

freedom1798's picture

Nobody owns a house free and clear.  You rent from the state, in the form of property tax.

Oracle of Kypseli's picture

Some states with over 65 discounts and homestead discounts are nothing versus the services you get. SC is one where my parents live. 

Al Bendova's picture

"BUT, what is your share of the national debt???"

 

My share is JACK SHIT.  I didn't run it up.

GunnerySgtHartman's picture

I'd better not get started on property taxes.  Few things piss me off more than property taxes - especially property taxes that go to local school boards.  I've yet to see a local school board that didn't claim it was in a state of "dire need" ...

markovchainey's picture

Hell yeah Sarge.  It would almost be tolerable if they'd send the little bastards who get D's and F's (do they give those anymore?) around the neighborhood to wash cars and cut lawns.  At least they'd be a little more prepared for their future occupations.

IH8OBAMA's picture

The high schools down here in Texas have better football stadiums than many colleges.  And those of us without kids are paying for all this BS.  I wonder if they would notice if I dress my dog up as a kid and sent her to school.  She's probably already smarter than most of those kids anyway.

 

GunnerySgtHartman's picture

I remember seeing an article not long about about a $72 million high-school football stadium in Katy, Texas.  I was floored.

JohnG's picture

My wife teaches kindergarten.  She refer's to it as pre-prison training, because that's where most will wind up, or else they get killed in a drug deal....

jughead's picture

the only thing they are in dire need of is a good tarring, feathering and a nice ride out of town on a rail.

The Wizard's picture

On the contrary, if home values go down so will property taxes. File a complaint with the county auditor on the value of your property. Get an appraisal of the drop, submit it and propety taxes will decrease. I do it all the time.

WhackoWarner's picture

OWN the roof over your head?  I do not think it is negaive.  Who gives a care what some idi0t values it as? Roof over head that is free and clear.  AS IN MY HOME AWAY FROM WALL ST.  The thing to budget for is local tax/insurance.  Reason #1  to live rural in a place where you have looked at the  "local" books.  And there are commonuties that open their books yearly for all to see.  (but not NYC or Boston or Atlanta or Miami or LA or anywhere with thriving decades of theft).  Nobody can help USA USA USA anymore.  Was on ICU but is now "pull the plug for humanitarian reasons ...take them off life support"  Fuck USa. (NOT THE "people or some of them"  Who is to decide in the USA anymore?  wHO THE FRIG is the warmonger liar and thief?  And really who will stop this rape by big banks and curtail the casino activity?)

Kinda simple thing it is.  Got an idiot raping the families evreywhere?   Shut them down.  BUT no. Not in USA USA usa  Nope. Loosen the regs and give them more chips to play roullete.  AND please make all losses covered by the crowd.  Rape the population and tax system and every dime any worker earns.  AND sit in some boardroom looking down; doing no productive labour beyond lies.  Time for this empire to fall and fall hard.

 

Rightfully so to question local property tax.  But the key is that it is local.  Direct vote.

The smaller the community the more direct the vote on al property tax.

Good luck NYC or the ilk.

 

Any yuge urban  district will see yuuuuge grabs.  Only in small commuties are the books open and bond floats for infrastructure available.   Good luck kids.

jughead's picture

when this shit goes belly up I start shooting bankers, lawyers and anyone attempting to do their bidding.  

gilhgvc's picture

that's been my prayer for about 10 yrs now...before they take me out, I pray I can bring a dozen or two with me..wishful thinking I know, so I will settle for just couple for company in hell

shamus001's picture

Correct! But moreover the market will still seek equilization. Thus, if rates increase and the cost of a 200k home goes up (lests say) 500/mo, while the value of the home drops (lets say) 100k (50%) Certainly in selling, the owner will lose his/her shirt.  But IF THEY STAY in their home (like our parents/grandparents did) then they will actually enjoy a larger home for the same monthly price that a new purchase at a higher interest rate will buy.

Trick during the collapse and devaluation (+ higher interest rates) IS TO STAY PUT!

83_vf_1100_c's picture

  I don't really care. Our home is paid for minus the annual county tax tithe. I plan to stay put in it. If values go up and I sell, still have to buy another home whose value also increased. Values plummet, same deal in reverse.  My kids are fucked either way as far as becoming home owners.

  Debt free is a good thing folks. The .gov makes up the rules to suit their needs and will find a way to fuck me over even though I did the right things. 

StychoKiller's picture

So?  At least ya got a roof over yer haid!

Gadocat's picture

No one in the U.S. owns their home.

aloha_snakbar's picture

You might own your home, but local government *always* owns the land...

Beam Me Up Scotty's picture

You rent from the government.  Try not paying your property taxes.  See how long it takes before you don't own the land anymore.

shamus001's picture

Property taxes is a form of taxation which is totally flexible as crafted by your local councel/government.  I suggest attending and educating your local populace to set forth a differing form of taxation to replace the quarterly income your region gleans from property taxes, THEN REMOVE the property tax altogether! Viola! County doesn't seize grammy's house anymore!

WernerHeisenberg's picture

Allodial title has become almost unknown worldwide.  Certainly I am not aware of any developed place where one's home is not taxed.  Places like Rarotonga and Niue do not tax property, but moving there is not easy.

The Wizard's picture

No one in the U.S. owns their home.

This is true. If the property is registered it is owned by the county in equity.

scintillator9's picture

The smallest of tax bills may sink one's boat:

http://money.cnn.com/2012/07/10/real_estate/tax-liens/

When homeowners don't pay property taxes or other municipal bills, like water or sewer fees, local governments have less money to maintain services like schools, police and fire departments and road maintenance. By selling tax liens, those governments can collect on what it is owed.

The report cited a case of an 81-year-old Rhode Island woman who fell behind on a $474 sewer bill. A corporation bought the home in a tax sale for $836.39. The woman was evicted from the home she had lived in for more than 40 years and the corporation resold the place for $85,000, the report said.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/04/28/pennsylvania-widow...

A Pennsylvania county judge has again ruled against a widow who lost her home because of an unpaid $6.30 interest charge for paying her school taxes late.

Beaver County Common Pleas Judge Gus Kwidis ruled that Eileen Battisti, of Aliquippa, was properly notified about the September 2011 tax sale of her home, which was valued at about $280,000 and sold at auction for $116,000. The decision last Tuesday followed an evidentiary hearing ordered by a higher court, which last April overturned his earlier ruling upholding the sale.

 

 

 

MoreFreedom's picture

Moral of the story - pay your tax bills.  Corollary: invest in government tax liens, but that's a business involved with collecting the money.

The Wizard's picture

Moral of the story is learn the law of how they have been able to pull this off for so many years. Don't count on the educational system to keep you in tune.

83_vf_1100_c's picture

Moral of the story is burn the house down and  drive to the tax office and start shooting motherfuckers.

DjangoCat's picture

We have two adjacent lots, one in one municipality with the house on it, and a vacant lot, which cannot be built on, in a second municipality.  We changed mailing address, and the second municipality was not informed.  We heard nothing for a couple of years, then, miraculously, they sent us a notice that the property would be auctioned off in the following month. 

Panic.  I went to the office and offered to pay the tax owing.  Only hard cash on the barrelhead accepted, no cards, no debit cards even, no cheques.  

They will get you if they can.

 

Joiningupthedots's picture

What a truly horirible fucking system you operate in America.

You legally steal a persons life time home equity for undre 20 dollars.

People accept this???

jughead's picture

until you find out that you don't own shit unless you can stop them from taking it. 

shovelhead's picture

It works for me.

I don't worry about a thing.

booboo's picture

you brought nothing into this world and thats the way you will leave it. Happy is the man that owns nothing but can go anywhere.

consider me gone's picture

Concrete over electrons. I own mine F&C which is all well and good until the whole ponzi scheme implodes. Then values drop to gawd knows what as no one can afford to buy. BUT you have a home assuming you can pay the taxes. Then, one day the smoke clears, hopefully, then values can theoretically begin to recover over the long term. But I figure it has to be better than owning electrons that say you own stocks and bonds. You just have to be in for the long haul. Its not like you have much of a a choice. You have to live somewhere. This whole slowly evolving train wreck is so unnerving and one day soon it'll get downright scary if it ain't already.

No Time for Fishing's picture

When the value of that home plummets with all the other homes you still own it, get to live in it, but your networth still takes the hit. 

DjangoCat's picture

Watch that property tax bill.  They will get you yet.  "No more deductibility for you", said the soup nazi.

 

illuminatus's picture

" Free and clear" is a misnomer. As long as you have property taxes to pay, it clearly isn't free or clear.

maxblockm's picture

Create a trust/LLC/entity.

Put house in entity's name.

Get a loan from bank to buy the house. 

Trust invests in BTC.

Winning.

Justin Case's picture

The juice never made it in Germany, but they certainly conquered merica, When their host goes belly up, where will they go next?

DjangoCat's picture

Sheldon Adelson and Michael Chertoff have been tied to the Las Vegas shooting 

http://themillenniumreport.com/2017/10/michael-chertoff-sheldon-adelson-...

 

smacker's picture

IAC and AIPAC will soon be fighting over ((who)) will control America.

11b40's picture

Are they planning to interfere with America's elections?

alexcojones's picture

ALL a rigged game. BUT not if you refuse to play.

Make your own rules and abide by them. Surround yourself with like minded friends. Avoid the brain dead sheep. Turn off the idiot box. Don't vote. Follow a code devised for thousands of years. Refuse to let fear dictate. Refuse the MSM views. Live free and die when death takes you.

 

 

gilhgvc's picture

I'm trying man, I'm trying. cut the cable 6 months ago