Radioactive Cloud Over Europe May Have Come From "Nuclear Accident" In Russia Or Kazakhstan

Tyler Durden's picture

About a month ago, we noted reports from the French nuclear watchdog ISRN that a spike in airborne radioactivity had been detected in the air in Western and Central Europe: "Ruthenium-106 has been detected by several European networks involved in the monitoring of atmospheric radioactive contamination, at levels of a few milliBecquerels per cubic meter of air."

According to IRSN calculations, the very low levels of atmospheric contamination of ruthenium 106 observed by European monitoring networks had no environmental or health consequences but several agencies across Europe were actively seeking answers on the origin of the contamination.

Fast forward to today, and the IRSN now believes they can narrow down the source of the "nuclear accident" to a nuclear facility in Russia or Kazakhstan sometime in the last week of September.  Per the Telegraph:

A cloud of radioactive pollution over Europe in recent weeks indicates that an accident has happened in a nuclear facility in Russia or Kazakhstan in the last week of September, French nuclear safety institute IRSN said on Thursday.

 

The IRSN ruled out an accident in a nuclear reactor, saying it was likely to be in a nuclear fuel treatment site or centre for radioactive medicine. There has been no impact on human health or the environment in Europe, the IRSN said.

 

IRSN, the technical arm of French nuclear regulator ASN, said in a statement it could not pinpoint the location of the release of radioactive material but that based on weather patterns, the most plausible zone lay south of the Ural mountains, between the Urals and the Volga river.

 

This could indicate Russia or possibly Kazakhstan, an IRSN official said.

Russia

And while the source of the contamination is yet to come forward, IRSN notes that if an accident of similar magnitude happened in France "it would have required the evacuation or sheltering of people in a radius of a few kilometers around the accident site."

IRSN estimates that the quantity of ruthenium 106 released was major, between 100 and 300 teraBecquerels, and that if an accident of this magnitude had happened in France it would have required the evacuation or sheltering of people in a radius of a few kilometers around the accident site.

 

The ruthenium 106 was probably released in a nuclear fuel treatment site or center for radioactive medicine, Peres said. Because of its short half-life of about a year, ruthenium 106 is used in nuclear medicine.

 

The IRSN ruled out an accident in a nuclear reactor, as that would have led to contamination with other radionuclides too. It also ruled out the crash of a ruthenium-powered satellite as an IAEA investigation has concluded that no ruthenium-containing satellite has fallen back on earth during this period.

 

Measurement from European stations showed high levels of ruthenium 106 in the atmosphere of the majority of European countries, at the beginning of October, with a steady decrease from Oct. 6 onwards.

Despite the concern for residents in close proximity to the "accident," IRSN has again confirmed that the concentrations of ruthenium 106 in the air that have been recorded in Europe were of no consequence for human health and the environment.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
WTFRLY's picture

It's not fair mom, all they do is talk about Russia Russia Russia!

peddling-fiction's picture

You see this is why you (MSM) should not lie all the time.

Peter and the Wolf was not optional reading.

The comprehension part seems like maff though, to some folks.

Manthong's picture

 

Well the good news might be that Ruthenium-106 might be suppressing a whole bunch of CO2 which is destroying the atmosphere.

bonin006's picture

I guess whoever wrote this knows the sheeple won't bother trying figure out what the data shows. 11 of the 12 radiation levels in the table are indicated as less than the noise level of the recording instruments, that is the data does not show with any certainty that there even was any radiation above background level or measurement error. The one reading claimed to be definite is only about 30% above the noise level.

peddling-fiction's picture

This is pure unadulterated BS.

Reading is not necessary, unless you want to "bite".

Mental poisoning is achieved by raising doubt and instilling fear.

I-Engineer's picture

I am an actual nuclear engineer and 200 TBq is an absolute fuckton of radiation (to be somewhere it isn't supposed to be). My question would be if there is that much Ru-106, where are the other fission products? If this is fission release, there should be a fucking lot of radioiodine around: that is how they found out about Chernobyl. If it was a pure Ru-106 release, it means it was a medical or processing plant issue. But still, 200 TBq is a lot. Ru-106 itself is pretty tame as a pure beta emitter with a fairly low engery. However, its daughter is Rh-106, which it will always be in secular equalibrium with, has some decent gamma radiation coming off of it. So 200 TBq of Ru-106 = 200 TBq of Rh-106 ... fuck it, I am too drunk to calculate how much dose you will get, but ...

Eyes Opened's picture

Get back to us when you are sober, because apart from your announcment of being "A Nuclear Engineer"... I didnt get too much info understandable by the everyday schmuck like my good self...

I-Engineer's picture

I was pretty coherent 'till the end. The point I guess I was trying to make was it is weird that this is the only isotope. If this was a nuclear fission reactor issue, you would see a whole lot of other things, and supposedly we don't. However, there have been a few of these "wierd isotope readings in the air near Russia" recently.

I wouldn't be terribly surprised if Russia was incinerating nuclear waste. Ru-106 has medical applications but has a long half-life. This means it sticks around for awhile.

bwdiii's picture

So if a cloud of ru106, rh106 etc covers a large area how well does it obfuscate smaller beta and gamma emissions that transiently occur inside that area. If you are looking for gamma from upon the sky, how much wou this radioactive "fog" "fog your film"??

I-Engineer's picture

I someone is reading this a day later....

It won't obscure anything. Well.... if you detectors are set up right it won't. Radiation only obscures other radiation when large concentrations are in the area. These don't fit with high concentrations. Think of it this way, can you see a red LED on your calculator if a floodlight is right behind said calculator? Depends on the floodlight.

 

roddy6667's picture

Shhhhhh! Don't disturb the snowflakes shitting in their adult diapers while masturbating to Fear Porn. If they didn't have articles like this to read they would have no reason to live.

BiteMeBO's picture

If symptoms persist consult your doctor.  

Anonymous_Beneficiary's picture

It's probably nothing..

now buy moar stawks!

BustedUpBiker's picture

That must be the other owner of Zero Hedge Mr Blackshall, with his juvenile “it’s probably nothing” chant.

ThrowAwayYourTV's picture

Just more humans destroying the planet. Nothiing to see here folks, move along move along.

williambanzai7's picture

Oh it's ok, if this happened in Japan everyone would celebrate by eating Fukushima sushi.

JuliaS's picture

Japan is an ally, so theirs is good radiation. Kinda like Chinese communism. Communism is only bad when it's Russian.

radio man's picture

Nothing to see here folks, please move along.

Baron von Bud's picture

This sounds like more Russia bs. The prevailing winds in that region are west to east. How is radioactive drift going to go that far Northwest?  

nmewn's picture

Climate change, Maduro banned bikinis models, Israel nuked the Canary Islands, BritBob threw a hissy fit over Gibraltar, CNN fake news divestiture...take your pick ;-)

Nekoti's picture

I like your logical thinking Baron. Also, how come every nuclear accident/incident is never a public threat?

HominyTwin's picture

Ukraine is the obvious answer. /sarc But nothing bad ever happens there since the coup, oops, I mean, since the pro-western government came to power using peaceful means. /end sarc

JLM's picture

I met a monitor of the UN a couple of weeks ago who studies and reports on threats in the Ukraine.  He was worried about chlorine gas in a local water treatment plant being a terrorist threat.  While I couldn't disagree I pointed him to all the used nuclear fuel in storage on the Ukrainian nuclear sites just beside the reactors.  If someone rolled up a fertilizer truck bomb to one of those sites it's game over.  His eyes got big.  I hoped he got the message.

Hope Copy's picture

That's a huge chlorine plant for the Slavansk Ti sponge plant the became illegal dur to the non nuke status of Ukraine and the Ti rolling mill next to it (that has a German name on  it).. by UN decree in 2010.. and don't forget the exploding Ti compressor blades of the F-135 Pratt and Whiteny engine and the finding of that Massachusetts importing company that was found at fault for not having the proper paperwork (providence) for the supplied Ti.  [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pratt_%26_Whitney_F135]

my new username's picture

Or Korea. Or Iran. Or Pakistan.

Hope Copy's picture

FYI.. NK has been turning the mountain into a doomsday bomb/volcano..  Nuke NK and suffer a little ICE AGE

mc888's picture

the most plausible zone lay south of the Ural mountains, between the Urals and the Volga river.

where the highest concentration of Ruthenium on the planet occurs naturally in the Earth's crust and they mine it

Volkodav's picture

       Yes

       better look other possiblities

       prolly reckless Ukraine

       and/or normal euro lies

 

buzzsaw99's picture

if it came from a snuke there would be a terrible stench like you get from canned carp in the alabama summer sun so we can rule that out too.

nmewn's picture

Little known fact, France is heavily dependent (and when I say heavily dependent, I mean HEAVILY dependent) on nuclear power and 85% of the nuclear power industry is owned by the government of France. 

So...I wonder where the "nuclear cloud" over Frawnse is coming from?

//////

Oh look, Le Seyne sur Mer (the highest concentration given by the chart above) is right down the road from a closed nuclear reactor farm called Marcoule Phenix. 

Clearly the...RUSSIANS!...agin ;-)

JuliaS's picture

Radiation is something most of our (and rival) spy satellites are trained to detect immediately. I mean, come on! We're had been detecting heat signatures of shoulder-launched RPG's from half a world away and we can't figure out where a giant neutron-spewing cloud is coming from or when exactly it showed up? Bull shit! When it comes to climate, they're confident where it'll be in 100 years though. No mystery there.

redmudhooch's picture

or Ukraine.

VT Was Right, Nuke Cloud Over Europe Tied to Illegal Ukraine Arsenal Explosion

https://www.veteranstoday.com/2017/11/10/vt-was-right-nuke-cloud-over-eu...

Nobody knows where the radioactive cloud comes from despite a planet ringed with radiation tracking satellites and a massive network of monitoring stations that came online in the wake of the Chernobyl disaster of 1986.

The blame game, as with staged Syrian gas attacks, on the victims of course.  What is the truth?  Ukraine has kept nuclear weapons and one cooked off at 2:06 in the video above.

When the story was first on VT, March 25, 2017, YouTube videos hit immediately.  However, aggressive censorship at orders of the Google Jigsaw group headed by Jared Cohen, the man we allege planned and executed the 2014 Ukraine coup, pinched off the story or at least tried to.

Google is the biggest threat to press freedom in world history, mark my words.  Google’s covert policy of supporting regime change and their clandestine military organization, operating in dozens of nations, have long been targeted by VT.

The truth is simple, Ukraine kept nuclear weapons, many of which are dangerous, having been poorly serviced, now unstable and as you can see, with disabled safety mechanisms.  We allege that these weapons have been used against Donesk and even offered for sale to Iran and Saudi Arabia as well.

francis scott falseflag's picture

Sounds like the Depleted Uranium Shells NATO used in Kosovo and Iraq were a thousand times worse.

 

How the West and its Media loves hypocrisy.

Quinvarius's picture

No actually it is most likely the Western part of Ukraine.  They have been talking about this potential for over a year in the region.

roadhazard's picture

Ruskies do not give a fuck.

MuffDiver69's picture

I remember my mother telling me a story about when she worked at NIH in Bethesda, Maryland in roughly 1964...China had just done a nuclear test(Atmospheric in those days) and they took the deep well Geiger counter and used it to measure for radioactivity and sure enough it had made its way over..This ain’t rocket science folks...Fukushima and the lies around that should give everyone pause..to say the least...

roddy6667's picture

Back in the Fifties and Sixties the US did open air nuclear bomb testing a lot. Radioactive fallout drifted across the country on a regular basis. All milk, even mother's milk contained Strontium 90. People would sit outside on the strip in Las Vegas and watch the flash and mushroom clouds from the nearby tests. Fukushima is is miniscule compared to what we lived through. It can hardly be measured on the West coast of the US, it is so weak.

Did we all die? No. We are now proceeding to outlive our parents' generation.

Volkodav's picture

      "per the Telegraph"...

King of Ruperts Land's picture

A nuke fight is a come'n. Everyone who can is nuk'n up.

Dragon HAwk's picture

Well one scary explanation is that who ever screwed up, didn't even know they did it.

Solio's picture

Izzat because they be dead?

TheLastTrump's picture

Geeeeeee....I wonder what the Russian shills will have to say about THIS?

YuConCornelius's picture

You need to ask the Russian trolls who dominate this website whether they have suffered unexplained hair loss, burns, etc ... more so than their usual existence.

Rex Andrus's picture

That's just the mobile xray machines on the road. Makes your teeth loose too.

Cluster_Frak's picture

Obama blew a fart on a camping trip.