If The Saudi Arabia Situation Doesn't Worry You, You're Not Paying Attention

Tyler Durden's picture

Authored by Chris Martenson via PeakProsperity.com,

While turbulent during the best of times, gigantic waves of change are now sweeping across the Middle East. The magnitude is such that the impact on the global price of oil, as well as world markets, is likely to be enormous.

A dramatic geo-political realignment by Saudi Arabia is in full swing this month. It’s upending many decades of established strategic relationships among the world's superpowers and, in particular, is throwing the Middle East into turmoil.

So much is currently in flux, especially in Saudi Arabia, that nearly anything can happen next. Which is precisely why this volatile situation should command our focused attention at this time.

The main elements currently in play are these:

  • A sudden and intense purging of powerful Saudi insiders (arrests, deaths, & asset seizures)
  • Huge changes in domestic policy and strategy 
  • A shift away from the US in all respects (politically, financially and militarily)
  • Deepening ties to China
  • A surprising turn towards Russia (economically and militarily)
  • Increasing cooperation and alignment with Israel (the enemy of my enemy is my friend?)

Taken together, this is tectonic change happening at blazing speed.

That it's receiving too little attention in the US press given the implications, is a tip off as to just how big a deal this is -- as we're all familiar by now with how the greater the actual relevance and importance of a development, the less press coverage it receives. This is not a direct conspiracy; it's just what happens when your press becomes an organ of the state and other powerful interests. Like a dog trained with daily rewards and punishments, after a while the press needs no further instruction on the house rules.

It does emphasize, however, that to be accurately informed about what's going on, we have to do our own homework. Here's a short primer to help get you started.

A Quick Primer

Unless you study it intensively, Saudi politics are difficult to follow because they are rooted in the drama of a very large and dysfunctional family battling over its immense wealth.  If you think your own family is nuts, multiply the crazy factor by 1,000, sprinkle in a willingness to kill any family members who get in your way, and you'll have the right perspective for grasping how Saudi 'politics' operate.

The House of Saud is the ruling royal family of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (hereafter referred to as "KSA") and consists of some 15,000 members. The majority of the power and wealth is concentrated in the hands of roughly 2,000 individuals.  4,000 male princes are in the mix, plus a larger number of involved females -- all trying to either hang on to or climb up a constantly-shifting mountain of power.

Here's a handy chart to explain the lineage of power in KSA over the decades:


We’ll get to the current ruler, King Salman, and his powerful son, Mohammed Bin Salman (age 32), shortly.  Before we do, though, let’s talk about the most seminal moment in recent Saudi history: the key oil-for-money-and-protection deal struck between the Nixon administration and King Faisal back in the early 1970’s.

This pivotal agreement allowed KSA to secretly recycle its surplus petrodollars back into US Treasuries while receiving US military protection in exchange.  The secret was kept for 41 years, only recently revealed in 2016 due to a Bloomberg FOIA request:

The basic framework was strikingly simple. The U.S. would buy oil from Saudi Arabia and provide the kingdom military aid and equipment. In return, the Saudis would plow billions of their petrodollar revenue back into Treasuries and finance America’s spending.


It took several discreet follow-up meetings to iron out all the details, Parsky said. But at the end of months of negotiations, there remained one small, yet crucial, catch: King Faisal bin Abdulaziz Al Saud demanded the country’s Treasury purchases stay “strictly secret,” according to a diplomatic cable obtained by Bloomberg from the National Archives database.


“Buying bonds and all that was a strategy to recycle petrodollars back into the U.S.,” said David Ottaway, a Middle East fellow at the Woodrow Wilson International Center in Washington. But politically, “it’s always been an ambiguous, constrained relationship.”


The essence of this deal is pretty simple. KSA wanted to be able to sell its oil to its then largest buyer, the USA, while also having a safe place to park the funds, plus receive military protection to boot. But it didn’t want anybody else, especially its Arab neighbors, to know that it was partnering so intimately with the US who, in turn, would be supporting Israel.  That would have been politically incendiary in the Middle East region, coming as it did right on the heels of the Yom Kipper War (1973).

As for the US, it got the oil it wanted and – double bonus time here – got KSA to recycle the very same dollars used to buy that oil back into Treasuries and contracts for US military equipment and training.

Sweet deal.

Note that this is yet another secret world-shaping deal successfully kept out of the media for over four decades. Yes Virginia, conspiracies do happen. Secrets can be (and are routinely) kept by hundreds, even thousands, of people over long stretches of time.  

Since that key deal was struck back in the early 1970s, the KSA has remained a steadfast supporter of the US and vice versa. In return, the US has never said anything substantive about KSA’s alleged involvement in 9/11 or its grotesque human and women’s rights violations. Not a peep.  

Until recently.

Then Things Started To Break Down

In 2015, King Salman came to power. Things began to change pretty quickly, especially once he elevated his son Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) to a position of greater power. 

Among MBS's first acts was to directly involve KSA into the Yemen civil war, with both troops on the ground and aerial bombings.  That war has killed thousands of civilians while creating a humanitarian crisis that includes the largest modern-day outbreak of cholera, which is decimating highly populated areas.  The conflct, which is considered a 'proxy war' because Iran is backing the Houthi rebels while KSA is backing the Yemeni government, continues to this day.

Then in 2016, KSA threatened to dump its $750 billion in (stated) US assets in response to a bill in Congress that would have released sensitive information implicating Saudi Arabia's involvement in 9/11.  Then-president Obama had to fly over there to smooth things out.  It seems the job he did was insufficient; because KSA-US relations unraveled at an accelerating pace afterwards.  Mission NOT accomplished, it would seem.

In 2017, KSA accused Qatar of nefarious acts and made such extraordinary demands that an outbreak of war nearly broke out over the dispute. The Qatari leadership later accused KSA of fomenting ‘regime change’, souring the situation further.  Again, Iran backed the Qatar government, which turned this conflict into another proxy battle between the two main regional Arab superpowers.

In parallel with all this, KSA was also supporting the mercenaries (aka "rebels" in western press) who were seeking to overthrow Assad in Syria -- yet another proxy war between KSA and Iran.  It's been an open secret that, during this conflict, KSA has been providing support to some seriously bad terrorist organizations like Al-Qaeda, ISIS and other supposed enemies of the US/NATO.  (Again, the US has never said 'boo' about that, proving that US rhetoric against "terrorists" is a fickle construct of political convenience, not a moral matter.)

Once Russia entered the war on the side of Syria's legitimate government, the US and KSA (and Israel) lost their momentum. Their dreams of toppling Assad and turning Syria into another failed petro-state like they did with Iraq and Libya are not likely to pan out as hoped.

But rather than retreat to lick their wounds, KSA's King Salman and his son are proving to be a lot nimbler than their predecessors. 

Rather than continue a losing battle in Syria, they've instead turned their energies and attention to dramatically reshaping KSA's internal power structures:

Saudi Arabia’s Saturday Night Massacre


For nearly a century, Saudi Arabia has been ruled by the elders of a royal family that now finds itself effectively controlled by a 32-year-old crown prince, Mohammad bin Salman. He helms the Defense Ministry, he has extravagant plans for economic development, and last week arranged for the arrest of some of the most powerful ministers and princes in the country.


A day before the arrests were announced, Houthi tribesmen in Yemen but allied with Iran, Saudi Arabia’s regional rival, fired a ballistic missile at Riyadh.


The Saudis claim the missile came from Iran and that its firing might be considered “an act of war.”


Saudi Arabia was created between the two world wars under British guidance. In the 1920s, a tribe known as the Sauds defeated the Hashemites, effectively annexing the exterior parts of Saudi Arabia they did not yet control. The United Kingdom recognized the Sauds’ claim shortly thereafter. But since then, the Saudi tribe has been torn by ambition, resentment and intrigue. The Saudi royal family has more in common with the Corleones than with a Norman Rockwell painting.


The direct attack was undoubtedly met with threats of a coup. Whether one was actually planned didn’t matter. Mohammed Bin Salman had to assume these threats were credible since so many interests were under attack. So he struck first, arresting princes and ex-minsters who constituted the Saudi elite. It was a dangerous gamble. A powerful opposition still exists, but he had no choice but to act. He could either strike as he did last Saturday night, or allow his enemies to choose the time and place of that attack. Nothing is secure yet, but with this strike, there is a chance he might have bought time. Any Saudi who would take on princes and clerics is obviously desperate, but he may well break the hold of the financial and religious elite.


This 32 year-old prince, Mohammed bin Salman has struck first and deep, completely upending the internal power dynamics of Saudi Arabia. 

He's taken on the political, financial and religious elites head on. For example, pushing through the decision to allow women to drive; a provocative move designed to send a clear message to the clerics who might oppose him. That message is: "I'm not fooling around here."

This is a classic example of how one goes about purging the opposition when either taking over a government after a coup, or implementing a big new strategy at a major corporation.  You have to remove any possible opponents and then install your own loyalists. According the Rules for Rulers, you do this by diverting a portion of the flow of funds to your new backers while diminishing, imprisoning or killing all potential enemies.

So far, Mohammed bin Salman's action plan is par for the course. No surprises.

The above article from Stratfor (well worth reading in its entirety) continues with these interesting insights:

The Iranians have been doing well since the nuclear deal was signed in 2015. They have become the dominant political force in Iraq. Their support for the Bashar Assad regime in Syria may not have been enough to save him, but Iran was on what appears to be the winning side in the Syrian civil war. Hezbollah has been hurt by its participation in the war but is reviving, carrying Iranian influence in Lebanon at a time when Lebanon is in crisis after the resignation of its prime minister last week.


The Saudis, on the other hand, aren’t doing as well. The Saudi-built anti-Houthi coalition in Yemen has failed to break the Houthi-led opposition. And Iran has openly entered into an alliance with Qatar against the wishes of the Saudis and their ally, the United Arab Emirates.


Iran seems to sense the possibility of achieving a dream: destabilizing Saudi Arabia, ending its ability to support anti-Iranian forces, and breaking the power of the Sunni Wahhabis. Iran must look at the arrests in Saudi Arabia as a very bad move. And they may be. Mohammad bin Salman has backed the fundamentalists and the financial elite against the wall.


They are desperate, and now it is their turn to roll the dice. If they fall short, it could result in a civil war in Saudi Arabia. If Iran can hit Riyadh with missiles, the crown prince’s opponents could argue that the young prince is so busy with his plans that he isn’t paying attention to the real threat. For the Iranians, the best outcome is to have no one come out on top.


This would reconfigure the geopolitics of the Middle East, and since the U.S. is deeply involved there, it has decisions to make.

So given Yemen, Syria, and its recent domestic purges, Saudi Arabia is in turmoil. It's in a far weaker position than it was a short while ago.

This leaves the US in a far weaker regional position, too, at precisely the time when China and Russia are increasing their own presence (which we’ll get to next).

But first we have to discuss what might happen if a civil war were to engulf Saudi Arabia.  The price of oil would undoubtedly spike. In turn, that would cripple the weaker countries, companies and households around the world that simply cannot afford a higher oil price. And there's a lot of them.

Financial markets would destabilize as long-suppressed volatility would explode higher, creating horrific losses across the board.  That very few investors are mentally or financially prepared for such carnage is a massive understatement.

So..if you were Saudi Arabia, in need of helpful allies after being bogged down in an unwinnable war in Yemen, just defeated in a proxy war in Syria, and your longtime 'ally', the US, is busy pumping as much of its own oil as it can, what would you do?

Pivot To China

Given its situation, is it really any surprise that King Salman and his son have decided to pivot to China?  In need of a new partner that would align better with their current and future interests, China is the obvious first choice.

So in March 2017, only a very short while after Obama's failed visit, a large and well-prepared KSA entourage accompanied King Salman to Beijing and inked tens of billions in new business deals:

China, Saudi Arabia eye $65 billion in deals as king visits

Mar 16, 2017


BEIJING (Reuters) - Saudi Arabia’s King Salman oversaw the signing of deals worth as much as $65 billion on the first day of a visit to Beijing on Thursday, as the world’s largest oil exporter looks to cement ties with the world’s second-largest economy.


The deals included a memorandum of understanding (MoU) between giant state oil firm Saudi Aramco and China North Industries Group Corp (Norinco), to look into building refining and chemical plants in China.


Saudi Basic Industries Corp (SABIC) and Sinopec, which already jointly run a chemical complex in Tinajin, also agreed to develop petrochemical projects in both China and Saudi Arabia.


Salman told Xi he hoped China could play an even greater role in Middle East affairs, the ministry added.


Deputy Chinese Foreign Minister Zhang Ming said the memorandums of understanding and letters of intent were potentially worth about $65 billion, involving everything from energy to space.


This was a very big deal in terms of Middle East geopolitics.  It shook up many decades of established power, resulting in a shift away from dependence on America. 

The Saudis arrived in China with such a huge crowd in tow that a reported 150 cooks had been brought along to just to feed everyone in the Saudi visitation party.   

The resulting deals struck involved everything from energy to infrastructure to information technology to space.  And this was just on the first visit.  Quite often a brand new trade delegation event involves posturing and bluffing and feeling each other out; not deals being struck.   So it’s clear that before the visit, well before, lots and lots of deals were being negotiated and terms agreed to so that the thick MOU files were ready to sign during the actual visit.

The scope and size of these business deals are eye catching, but the real clincher is King Salman's public statement expressing hope China will play "an even greater role in Middle East affairs."

That, right there, is the sound of the geopolitical axis-tilting. That public statement tells us everything we need to know about the sort of change the Salman dynasty intends to pursue. 

So it should have surprised no one to hear that, in August this year, another $70 billion of new deals were announced between China and KSA. The fanfare extolled that Saudi-Sino relations had entered a new era, with “the agreements covering investment, trade, energy, postal service, communications, and media.”

This is a very rapid pace for such large deals.  If KSA and China were dating, they’d be talking about moving in together already. They're clearly at the selecting furniture and carpet samples stage.

As for the US? It seems KSA isn't even returning its calls or texts at this point.

You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet...

All of the above merely describes how we arrived at where things stand today.

But as mentioned, the power grab underway in KSA by Mohammed bin Salman is unfolding in real-time. Developments are happening hourly -- while writing this, the very high-profile Prince Bandar bin Sultan (recent head of Saudi Intelligence and former longtime ambassador to the US) has been arrested.

The trajectory of events is headed in a direction that may well end the arrangement that has served as the axis around which geopolitics has spun for the past 40 years. The Saudis want new partners, and are courting China hard. 

China, for reasons we discuss in Part 2 of this report, has an existential need to supplant America as Saudi Arabia's most vital oil customer.

And both Saudi Arabia and China are inking an increasing number of strategic oil deals with Russia. Why? We get into that in Part 2, too -- but suffice it to say, in the fast-shifting world of KSA foreign policy, it's China and Russia 'in', US 'out'.

Maybe not all the way out, but the US clearly has lost a lot of ground with KSA over the past few years.  My analysis is that by funding an insane amount of shale oil development, at a loss, and at any cost (such as to our biggest Mideast ally) the US has time and again displayed that our ‘friendship’ does not run very deep.  In a world where loyalty counts, the US has proved a disloyal partner. Can China position itself to be perceived of as a better mate? When it comes to business, I believe the answer is ‘yes.’


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Bigly's picture

I just do not know where this falls in my prioritization of doom.

Before Yellowstone, but after financial meltdown?

TeethVillage88s's picture

For those that missed out on membership in Skull and Bones or one of the other Secret Societies in US Ivy League Universities...

You can find an opportunity to join in the Saudi "War Dance"... Which Mar, you ask?

- A War for Expansion of Saudi & US Business Interests
- Or a Suckers War, where one side aids the start of the war and supports the war but exposes it's own weakness, destroys it's own power, projects it's logistics too far out, exposes it's best war assets

JimmyJones's picture

SaudiArabia just gave citizenship to a Ai robot 

This is huge and totally flew under the radar, is their a connection to the massive power shift in Saudi Arabia? 1200 people arrested  300 billion dollars worth of assets seized / frozen so far as if a couple days ago and still presently climbing.  https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/zarastone/2017/11/07/e...

What Forbes fails to mention that their main partner is doing this,  https://singularitynet.io so why would you wish to give your creation citizenship? And that creation most likely had a hand in creating this new way for AI'S to interact with each other and actively participate in a common market place? Very buggy shit. Now it gets even more buggy because of this guy, Dr. Ben Goetzel  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Goertzel This guy graduated college at 19 with a degree in Quantitative Studies (whatever that is) and kept on going in graduate school with applied mathematics. Now he's important because he developed the AI robot first then this Ai trading / interaction platform was invented, did the Ai develope it's own system to interact with other ai's? Now this Dr is buddy buddy with Peter Thiel  ,  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Thiel the ultra rich tech mogul gay Trump backer. Remember the picture of Trump and the Saudi King with their hands on that Glowing Orb? I don't think the Saudis are pivoting away from the US but rather away from the Federal Reserve and the banking cartel. These Same Guys ARE Behind  Ethereum AND THIS Ai Trading PlatForm

They Gave A FREAKING ROBOT Citizenship , Then Purged THEIR GOVT, AND SIEZED hundreds of BILLIONS.


williambanzai7's picture

But how does this link to the Falklands war?

Manthong's picture


They are a third world nation driven by a crazy tribal cult that only has hundreds of billions of dollars in US, UK and EU weaponry….

Now I hear they are getting S-400.s ……


What could possibly go wrong?

I hope nobody loses their heads over this little matter.


bobcatz's picture

Saudi Arabia is TIRED of being wagged by the Israhellis via the US. http://wp.me/p4OZ4v-2g9

Escrava Isaura's picture

The reason that the world is moving towards China this fast, it’s because of Trump.

Trump is too radical, and that’s why these nations are running for the exit.

"Trump's policies are taking a whole bunch of countries that were already worried about America's commitment to lead and America's commitment to its alliances. China also wants to be seen now as promoting globalization, promoting free trade, particularly for countries in Asia that don't want to count on the U.S." — Ian Bremmer


Manthong's picture


Can I please buy some of Ian Bremmer's hallucinogens????

I could use a departure from reality, too.


Escrava Isaura's picture

departure from reality…………

Plenty of that around here. It makes people feel good, at least.


booboo's picture

I guess you missed the part with the Saudi entourage to China after the magic negro’s emergency visit failed to impress them. To be honest it really does not matter since every administration has exposed our willingness to bend over to the KSA.

jeff montanye's picture

obama vetoed the law that allowed 9-11 suits against ksa but the u.s. congress overwhelmingly overturned his veto (97 to 1 in the senate).  this law probably had more to do with riling the ksa.


note the 9-11 families never got a chance to sue anyone in israel because judge alvin k. hellerstein ruled against every single one of them and was supported up to the supreme court.  and he had a son working for the israeli law firm that was defending some of the defendants.  


Escrava Isaura's picture

I find ironic that the conservatives feels outraged if the liberals wanted to pass some law about suing doctors for doctor’s negligence/malpractice.

However, the conservatives feel that they can sue other nations with circumstantial and/or some downright fabricated evidence.

Must to be some on their brain in relation to their hate to the current environment that they don’t like. Not quite an illusion or fantasy, but creation of an ideal world ‘scenario’ that suits their believes.

All the while the world is falling apart.



E5's picture

Obama murdered a US Citizen teenager without any due process.  You obviously support him and the people of the democrat party who have sworn an oath of loyalty to do anything to take complete control of the government.  You and the Republicans and Democrats are part of a coup and finally, with the aftermath of the nukes in Latakia and Palestine you will get what is coming to you.  Wait for it.

Escrava Isaura's picture

Do you think it will get any better under Trump?

We will find out in three more years.


Kayman's picture


"All the while the world is falling apart."

The world-in the Middle East- has always been falling apart. Pull off your sphincter necklace.

Let China finance the Middle East tribal quagmire. Let America spend $5.6 Trillion on energy independence.

Hata Mari's picture

Go macro vision Escrava. Micro is so .. yesterday!

Bill of Rights's picture

Fucken Moron alert...this is to ADULT for you to understand retard go awy...

TeethVillage88s's picture

Wot about Dick Cheney, Alberto Gonzales, Don Rumsfeld, G.W.B., Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq, Colin Powell, John Bolton, Condaleza Rice, Samantha Powers, Kagan, Susan Rice, Hilary Clinton, Clinton Foundation, noecons, McCain, Lindsey Graham, Phil Gramm, TBTF

Escrava Isaura's picture

Listen, it’s easy.

Eurasia is moving left. More trade. More openness. Paris agreement. And so on.

US is moving right, which is the opposite. More protectionism. More tariffs. Forget the environment.

Second, US consumes about 20% of the word’s resources and energy while having 5% of the world population.

So, if the world can eliminate ‘downsize’ the US, they will be able to kick the can a little longer.

And Trump, conservative ways of doing things, it’s helping the world accomplish that.

America needs the world more than the world needs America.

But try to tell that to a conservative or a left winger?

They can’t hear.

They won’t accept it.

 Because they have been left behind. And this reality ‘of been left behind’ is a reality that they can’t face.

So these people have to step away from reality. Some want Armageddon ‘moral reason’ so they can kill the people that did this to them.  

It’s a conundrum that there’s no easy way out, if any. That’s why I favor raising the taxes on the rich and government workers to reverse the disparity and the despair.

But you and I know that these are not going to happen, because the conservatives are against raising taxes, go figure!


Hata Mari's picture

You're almost there, Escrava. Almost to level 1. Keep going; one day you'll get it.

USA not getting left behind. USA taking it to the next step. MAGA Baby! MEGA!

Offthebeach's picture

"Second, US consumes about 20% of the word’s resources and energy while having 5% of the world population."

Its not 'the worlds energy"  It us ours.  And we do it because we can.  3-4 billion people consume near zero.  Woopee.  They dont because they can't.   But I suppose they, you, can virtue signal.

I like energy.  A lot.  I think it would be better if we consumed twice as much.  Energy is good.  Cheap, plentiful energy is better.

ThanksChump's picture


The obvious now having been said and out of the way, the US has not been pouring money into shale development. China has. Yes, US companies develop a field, but they immediately court Chinese investors to buy the future (exaggerated) product of those fields at a premium. Nowhere moreso than the Bakken shale wells.

The US drillers borrow the money to lease the land, drill, and establish provable production. Then, they court a Chinese investor to sell that proven production level out over 10 years, which is a good 7 years more than those welss will actually produce, and as most people know, a Bakken well's production declines almost immediately. So the drillers have a bank loan and a check from China... What to do? Pocket the check! Lease more land! Borrow more money! Drill more wells!

This is why the drama unfolding in the Middle East is a bit more worrisome, and a lot more hilarious, all at the same time.

Escrava Isaura's picture

Chris Martenson knows that. He interviewed people about it. This is common practice in the US.

At the housing bubble, I think I read it here, some loans were sold up to 27 times over, because the bankers knew that default was eminent. So, the bankers kept selling the same loan.

And the Europeans, especially Germany went all in.

So did the Japan in late 80’s and 90’s.


MEFOBILLS's picture

The loans originated at small local banks.  Then said loans were on-sold to TBTF banks, which had internal 601spv's.  These spv were carve outs in the law, which big banks agitated for and bribed their way to get.

601 spv's took mortgage debt instrument and tranched it.  Another paper instrument called MBS spun out.  This would be a hypothecation of a hypothecation.

There was also deception when the MBS were created, by putting low risk loans together with high risk loans, to then head fake investigators and potential investors.

MBS were sold as something to guarantee returns.  Floods of bank capital likes to park overnight, and get some usury gravy.  The flow of usury was then from homeowners paying their mortgages, and from there it flowed into holders of MBS.

After 2008, many mortgages were revealed as shaky, because they were hypothecated with fraud.  There were Ninja loans, liar loans, etc.  Why?  Because the private banksters on-sold the mortgages right away, and hence on-sold the risk as well.

Without the inflows of usury to pay for MBS holder, the system started to collapse.  There were even more bets placed on top of the bets. Since it was paper built on top of paper with large leverage ratios, then contagion spreads quickly also, in a multiplication (leverage) manner.  None of this towering leverage and paper was based on fundamentals, it was all deception, it was pushing prices in housing with the "from nothing" creation of bank money.

Europeons and Germany still had vestigages of high trust societies at the time, and didn't understand the depth of America's ((Parasitism)).  Germany especially with its public banking tradition was duped.  Goldman Sachs called the German's "Muppets."

WordSmith2013's picture

The Saudi coups and counter-coups have been ongoing since Jan 2015.
Where it ends up is anyone's guess, but it's gonna get very ugly before it resolves.




Counter-coup in Saudi Arabia played out in Las Vegas on Oct. 1 at the Mandalay Bay
Richard Chesler's picture

Sand niggers will be sand niggers.
Call Soweeto to do some bowing.

SixIsNinE's picture

Holy Smokes~!   dude -  there's Saddam Hussein standing in plain sight! 

so he REALLY is alive and kicking - remember all those rumors about how they used a double to hang?




Manthong's picture

Well, hell.... if it was not for rehypothication upon rehypothication upon rehypothicastion. where would finance be now?

Escrava Isaura's picture

What? There’s even a ‘new’ fancy name for German suckers?


Gosh, these people are good.

Just wonder if the Germans, pardon me, The Muppets blame the Germany government as well…………….you know, for them being suckers, I mean naive where I come from.



Offthebeach's picture

Locally owned banks kepth the mortgages inhouse.  Local banks and regional banks faired well.

Winston Churchill's picture

Bear Stearns held the record with one mortgage sold into 42 separate trusts.

The Fedres owns all those trusts now bought at par.

earleflorida's picture

In March/2015 (remember the tyming of this move) the UK joined the 'Asian Infrastructure Bank'. This new ('AIB') China-led Financial Institution will soon rival USA-dominated IMF & World Bank. Thusly, further undermining the American Imperialism Capitalist System power and influence in the Asian Region! Ironically the UK was thinking well ahead for its own self-preservation financial security before the Brexit debacle,... when, the USSA was pressing it to stand-down and maintain a faux-appeal to the failing EU project,via fucking Germany!?!! 

This brilliant move gives the UK Gov't (City of London) the means of developing its own relationship with China.

But there's one caveat:  "The Jewish Monopoly on Opium Still Fuels Chinese Resentment Today"

site/ link is censured? Google the above for why its a no-no subject regarding China letting Private Banking Capital Companies, via 'The City of London' jewish cartel!!! inside the country after the British burnt the entire country to the ground less than 80 years hence!?!

It was without exaggeration the sacking of China, destroying 5,000 years of history and,..--- just fucking sad!!! 


Note: The chinese know trumps game of BS, and will tolerate him so long as to get its revenge served cold from FDR/Truman's Americana.

$250 Bln. is chump change to China, and KSAs contracts are shit when the Shia Crescent and Russia will rule the roost as China's energy czar!  

SixIsNinE's picture

i don't know Earle -  remember there were so many chinese killed in the 20th century that there may not be any memory of what you're talking about. 

look - they didn't even have to kill us here in USA - just nonstop dumbing down and teevee movie to bring us here.  some of us may remember somethings from way back - so.   end of the day we gotta do what we do to survive another day.  digital memories.  will they be like yesterday's papers?    who knows, maybe they'll be more lasting.  what's to stop a hard drive if stored well from not working in 100 years.  getting older and watching things age is fascinating.  

my grandpa's class photo from 1921 looks just fine.  they used some good quality however they did stuff back then.  photos and slides from 60s and 70s - not aging so well.   color especially fading. 

digital stuff from my earliest digital cameras - still perfect.  can print out whenever.

17 year old can of tuna - just fine.  good as new.   just opened a can of organic pumpkin canned over 10 years ago, good as new. 


earleflorida's picture


absolutely well said! Old age is nice-)

it is said by the 5th generation all hositilities are of war...--- become cautionary tales!?!

Tis a sad state that never lets one move-on to a better reality. I guess its in our makeup since we walked out of the oceans,... eah, and were burnt by the sun?

Escrava Isaura's picture

Bear Stearns held the record with one mortgage sold into 42 separate trusts.


And most Americans are worried of their government.

While the real corruption, usury, and scams are someplace else.


DownWithYogaPants's picture

Good God Escrave you are being dumb even by your own standards of really idiotic illogical and naive analysis.

chunga's picture

Then banks often without any skin in the game won their foreclosure lawsuits...~ 7,000,000 times in a row.

EddieLomax's picture

I'm sure these countries just cannot get enough American leadership, I wish America would lead me too.

The stupidity and arrogance in his thinking is mindblowing.

rockstone's picture

Lol....! Dude....you've got a bigger ego than The Donald himself.

LightBeamCowboy's picture

I've watched these Middle East problems brewing for the whole of my long life, and they were festering long before I was born, but it's all Trump's fault after he's been in office for 10 months? Your sense of the sweep of history would come in second to a lab mouse, sir.

Escrava Isaura's picture

LightBeamCowboy: …..it's all Trump's fault after he's been in office for 10 months?

I said “Trump is not helping.” In all my posts I never blamed Trump for the current situation.

I have several problems with Trump be the President, but I would like to focus on two problems: His strategy and his tactical moves.

Trump’s America (strategically) first confuses and backfire.

He confuses, because as if he is extracting himself. He’s talking abstractly. As if he’s telling the other leaders “I like you guys but I have to say that to my base.” Note when Trump is overseas he seems to hedge when he says America first.

And makes no sense extracting America from the world economy, because Americans are the biggest beneficiary of it.

And here are some examples: America having the lowest inflation and the cheapest gasoline and natural gas compared to other industrialized nations. Americans benefit from these because we export dollars instead of goods.

Now on my issue with Trump’s tactical moves.

Trump believes he can charm his way around power. I think it’s a mistake. Unnecessary distraction.

Trump can charm ‘impress’ some investors, some engineers, some architects, and some builders in his properties; however, most world leaders won’t fall for that.

Lots of diplomacy and behind the scene are what work.    



LightBeamCowboy's picture

"And makes no sense extracting America from the world economy, because Americans are the biggest beneficiary of it."

Correction: WERE (past tense) the biggest beneficiary of it, as long as the petrodollar lasted, allowing Americans to buy cheap around the world. The petrodollar is ending NOW, which is partly what the above article is about. So now Americans owe the rest of the world trillions of dollars (you should read about Triffon's Paradox), we've lost our once-great manufacturing sector, and the world hates us.

Somehow I don't feel benefited.

negan2's picture

Troll. Liboturd. Trying to separate President Trump supporters from the President. It is President Trump. Get it, Buttercup. President Trump. Suck it up, Buttercup. Eight (8) years, God forsaken Liboturd Troll. Goat Humper, Coward, & Traitor. Descend to the level of beasts that mate with your soul.