US-Supplied Defense System Failed To Intercept Houthi Missile Attack On Saudi Capital

Tyler Durden's picture

A new study in the New York Times suggests that Saudi Arabia's state of the art defense system failed to intercept the ballistic missile fired by Yemen's Houthi rebels which nearly hit Riyadh's international airport on November 4th. The report contradicts the official claims of the Saudi and American governments, which both announced immediately after the incident that the US-supplied Patriot missile defense system had successfully intercepted the Houthi fired Scud.  

The analysis, which utilized open-source material in the form of available video and social media photos of the aftermath of the attack, was conducted by a team of missile experts, and threatens to shake confidence in the US system, which is currently implemented by American allies around the world from South Korea and Taiwan to Turkey, Israel and Japan, among others. 


Image via Indian Express, representational image

And notably President Trump himself had announced while aboard Air Force One on the day following the attack, “Our system knocked the missile out of the air.” Trump also emphasized the importance of demonstrable success of the systems and added, “That’s how good we are. Nobody makes what we make, and now we’re selling it all over the world.”

But The New York Times report begins with a flat contradiction of that claim:

The official story was clear: Saudi forces shot down a ballistic missile fired by Yemen’s Houthi rebel group last month at Saudi Arabia’s capital, Riyadh. It was a victory for the Saudis and for the United States, which supplied the Patriot missile defense system.

 

...But an analysis of photos and videos of the strike posted to social media suggests that story may be wrong. Instead, evidence analyzed by a research team of missile experts appears to show the missile’s warhead flew unimpeded over Saudi defenses and nearly hit its target, Riyadh’s airport. The warhead detonated so close to the domestic terminal that customers jumped out of their seats.

The Houthi missile was identified at the time as a Burqan-2, revealed in a video of the November 4 launch produced by a Houthi group, and is a variant of the Scud missile commonly used in the region. The attack took Middle East observers by surprise as the missile traveled about 600 miles and reveals a growing sophistication in the Houthi arsenal - all of which led to a number of researchers to claim Iranian origins of the weapon, something which Iran and its regional allies continue to deny.


Image via How Stuff Works/Raytheon

As part of the NYT investigation experts primarily examined the multiple videos and photos of missile debris locations and missile parts, and concluded that the Saudis couldn't have intercepted the warhead, which further appears to have exploded on impact, something which wouldn't have happened had the projectile been effectively intercepted. 

The report continues

Saudi officials said the debris, which appears to belong to a downed Burqan-2, showed a successful shootdown. But an analysis of the debris shows that the warhead components – the part of the missile that carries the explosives – were missing. The missing warhead signaled something important to the analysts: that the missile may have evaded Saudi defenses.

 

...This would explain why the debris in Riyadh only appears to consist of the rear tube. And it suggests that the Saudis may have missed the missile, or only hit the tube after it had separated and begun to fall uselessly toward earth.

Researchers also examined extensive video and eyewitness testimony from the airport and in the vicinity of what the Saudi authorities initially reported as mere falling debris, however, the evidence points to an explosion that could only be explained by the impact of the warhead, which likely evaded the defensive measures. Videos recorded an explosion which occurred at a location very near the main domestic terminal of the airport, the immediate aftermath of which was clearly visible and was strongly felt inside the terminal. 

Video sequence showing footage collected from the November 4th attack.

The warhead, the report says, continued on its trajectory after mid-air separation from the rest of the missile, which it is designed to do, making it harder to intercept as it nears its target. Though Saudi officials claimed that it was only debris from an intercepted missile that hit the airport, researchers concluded

The blast was small, and satellite imagery of the airport taken immediately before and after the blast is not detailed enough to capture the crater from the impact, the analysts said. But it does show ground damage from the emergency vehicles, supporting the finding that the warhead hit just off the runway.

 

While the Houthis missed their target, Mr. Lewis said, they got close enough to show that their missiles can reach it and can evade Saudi defenses. “A kilometer is a pretty normal miss rate for a Scud,” he said. “The Houthis got very close to creaming that airport.”

One scientist cited in the report, Laura Grego, noted that it's hugely significant that the Saudis fired five times at the incoming missile and missed. "You shoot five times at this missile and they all miss? That's shocking,” she said. “That's shocking because this system is supposed to work.”

Though the Saudi government didn't respond to the report, and will likely not address the findings, it will be interesting to see the Patriot system's performance during the next incursion. As fighting is continuing to intensify in neighboring Yemen, it is likely only a matter of time.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
D.T.Barnum's picture

"bark loudly and carry a limp stick <honk honk>" D.T. Barnum

shitshitshit's picture

imagine my surprise.

now think about NK

ParkAveFlasher's picture

I'm too busy thinking about Pearl Harbor.

jeff montanye's picture

maybe saudi needs a few s-400's.

random999's picture

The iron dome did pretty well. Patriots seem to suck but that doesnt mean usa doesnt have other tech that works.

svayambhu108's picture

The old tractor gearbox we saw on twitter says that the missile was intercepted and destroyed. period.

 

The Alarmist's picture

The real-life track record is as follows:

Iron Dome -> Failure
Patriot -> Failure
THAAD -> Failure

Imagine how toothless we'd look if we took a shot at one of the Nork's missile launches and failed. This is why we've only made loud noises so far.

eforce's picture

Is it fair to judge Patriot when crewed by non-US crews (especially the Saudis)?

Shemp 4 Victory's picture

The Emperor's Wunderwaffle wears no clothes.

Fish Gone Bad's picture

In theory, what works in theory works in real life.  In real life, the shit doesn't work. 

IH8OBAMA's picture

Something doesn't read true about this story.  It does come from the FAKE NEWS NYT.

 

BennyBoy's picture

 

Best defense against SCUDs is no defense. They are wildly inaccurate. And the US missles even more inaccurate.

BennyBoy's picture

 

Best defense against SCUDs is no defense. They are wildly inaccurate. And the US missles even more inaccurate.

shovelhead's picture

Well it ain't exactly a system that relies on a great hand-eye coordination. It either tracks and hits or it doesn't.

It appears that the missile boys say it doesn't.

Five times, it doesn't ain't exactly a great sales pitch for Raytheon.

HowdyDoody's picture

Missile defense always struck me as a hit or miss business. It looks like the US has gone for the easier and more profitable miss option.

ParticularlyStupidHumanoid's picture

It's quite obvious that ZergHedge is attacking US technology without any basis. Ah, the multi-pronged approach of Moosad. For an intercept to be successful radar must be placed well. That's because there's only a narrow window of opportunity for taking out a rocket. Launch too late, or from too far away, and it's hopeless.

hestroy's picture

OK, retard. When USA attacked Iraq, only few percent of Scuds were successfully intercepted by Patriots.

http://www.nytimes.com/1993/11/21/world/patriot-missile-s-success-a-myth...

TheReplacement's picture

Zh only regurgitated a NYT article so it is quite obvious you have very little reading comprehension capability.

Mustafa Kemal's picture

" Nobody makes what we make, and now we’re selling it all over the world.”"

But, at least were winning

 

Nothing like bragging how much we are selling weapons throughout the world.  Nice to see your colors Donald.

PT's picture

"... and now we're selling it all over the world." :  Well, I can understand how that would make you feel richer but I can't understand how it would make you feel safer

"But we have the best weapons!"
"I know.  But you're selling them all over the world!!!!!!!!"

 

Well, given that you trust foreigners all over the world with your you-beaut weapons, can I buy one?  Or do I have to change my nationality?

TheReplacement's picture

If you think the domestic model is bad you don't want to have to count on the export model.

Vageling's picture

They invented identity politics for that. Just think of yourself like a Apache fight chopper. You can even scream "ratatatatatat".

In the real world. We have enough crooks with serious war toys. Let's not make it accessible to the thug muppet on the corner, please?

Kobe Beef's picture

Keep selling them small arms and outmoded systems, and make sure the Semites destroy themselves.

Good riddance.

Mr Hankey's picture

Next thing you know,we will even be selling the shit to our enemies. 

Slomotrainwreck's picture

Oh, wait. I thought you wanted to shoo them down. Let me get you these other missiles.

XWeatherman's picture

It doesn't have to work.  It must, however, provide HUUUUGE profits to the U.S. Military Industrial Complex Death-Merchants, who use kick-backs to bribe the U.S. Congress so their game of "be affraid of the Boogey Man" will continue.

greenskeeper carl's picture

I thought we concluded that was the water pump off a 62 Buick?

While it's entirely possible that system doesn't actually work, it's equally possible that this was user error on the part of the saudis. I've spent some time over there a long time ago, and those people do not take care of ANYTHING nor do they bother learning how to use it. They could break an iron anvil with a rubber mallet.

Grimaldus's picture

I tend not to beleive anything reported by the NYT. The progressive stupid is strong with them.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grimaldus

 

RationalLuddite's picture

NYT just front running.  Mate over there said it's being discussed in UAE, people reporting the near miss at the airport. It is coming out one way or the other so NYT making a virtue of a necessity.

Grimaldus's picture

The defense system misses could be true or it could be the fact that missle wreckage falls to the ground. Gravity and all that.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grimaldus

jaxville's picture

  What matters is where the warhead falls and detonates.

Conscious Reviver's picture

Carl, I'm gonna bet you dollars to donuts that no Saudi operates that stuff. They hire honkies to do the techno work.

Hilarious. What will the Khazars do with 100,000 high end missles coming at them from Hezbollah-ville? Suffer. That's what.

Kobe Beef's picture

Good riddance. 

Make sure none escape this time.

1 Alabama's picture

I dropped a toothpick on your bosses head, think that will have any effects.

Davidduke2000's picture

however missiles do not have gearboxes, the gearboxes said Mercedes on them, unless of course the missile was made by mercedes. 

PT's picture

But was it an automatic missile or a manual missile?  Or was it an old road ranger gearbox?  Perhaps the missile forgot to double de-clutch.

mkkby's picture

Story is fake NYT news. 

Problem was saudi crew fired too late, after warhead separated from main body.  The missile actually hit the main body -- so the fake *experts* admitted it was a successful hit.  The system is not designed to distinguish the warhead from other parts in mid air.

You have to use a weapon correctly.  It cannot do something is wasn't designed to do.

Davidduke2000's picture

david sling and iron dome another israeli propaganda crap, ask Hezbollah.

hestroy's picture

LOL!!!! Try another jooshit.

shamus001's picture

Screw that! USER ERROR, send those DUPES an instruction manual! They havent fought their own battles since 1973 and likely couldnt load a cartridge without us holding their hand!

Branded's picture

. . . people pay money for them, so they work just fine.

yarpos's picture

You can imagine whatever makes you feel good I guess

Fiscal.Enema's picture

Triple digit SAMS are easy to mess with. The system can be spoofed and overwhelmed. LO HARMs and EMPs. (Yes, they do exist in US inventory). can deal with the threat.

 

DarthRevan's picture

Don't believe the hype. It hasn't stopped Israel from attacking Syria whenever it wants. 

Volkodav's picture

       Looks you know nothing about this subject