The Moment The Market Broke: "The Behavior Of Volatility Changed Entirely In 2014"

Tyler Durden's picture

Earlier today we showed a remarkable chart - and assertion - from Bank of America: "In every major market shock since the 2013 Taper Tantrum, central banks have stepped in (even if verbally) to protect markets. Following the Brexit vote, markets no longer needed to hear from CBs as they rebounded so quickly that CBs didn’t need to respond." As a result, buy-the-dip has a become a self-fulfilling put.

The immediate result of this dynamic has been two-fold: i) investors now buy every dip, or as Bank of America notes, "Investors no longer fear shocks, but love them, as it is an opportunity to predictably generate alpha.", and ii) selling of vol has become a self-reinforcing dynamic, in which lower VIX begets more vol-selling by "yield-starved investors", leading to even lower VIX as the shock that can reset the feedback loop is no longer possible, and thus the strike price on the Fed's put can not be put to a market test.

These observations prompt BofA's derivatives expert Benjamin Bowler to ask the rhetorical question: "volatility: new normal or bubble?" and answer: "It's a bubble." Indeed it is, but absent the abovementioned market-clearing shock, it is difficult, if not impossible to anticipate what can burst this bubble.

In the meantime, the market has spawned some spectacular distortions, including the following observation: "As one measure of volatility, the Dow Jones Industrial Average traded in its tightest trading range since 1900 this year." Here is Bowler:

While asset valuations are not at life-extremes, volatility is. In 2017 the Dow traded in a 110yr record tight trading range, the VIX hit all-time lows, and US equities reversed from sell-offs at near their fastest pace in 90 yrs. Investors no longer fear risk but love it, as it’s another opportunity to harvest “dip-alpha”. Volatility across asset classes has decoupled from uncertainty. Even if seemingly irrational, apathy to all risk has been the right trade and an impossible trend for most to fight – the definition of a bubble.

A bubble, he adds, "induced by years of heavy handed central bank influence, where investors have learned that it has not paid to panic." Bowler asks readers to consider the following:

As one measure of volatility, the Dow Jones Industrial Average traded in its tightest trading range since 1900 this year

Near 90yr records are occurring in the speed that US equities are recovering from dips

The VIX is near 26yr lows despite political & policy uncertainty recently near 26yr highs


Gold call options price less than 1 in 100 chance of rising North Korean tensions in the face of rising North Korean tensions

The above leads Bowler to concludes that "while there is active debate about whether risk-assets like equities and credit are overvalued, it is much harder to argue that currently depressed volatility levels are unsustainable when near 100yr records in terms of low vol and the lack of persistence of any shock are being recorded."

So when did the market "break", and when did the behavior of volatility change so dramatically?

This overarching question has been plaguing Wall Street strategists for much of 2017. In July, we presented one answer from Deutsche Bank's Aleksandar Kocic who pointed out the divergence between the economic policy uncertainty index and the VIX, which took place roughly in 2012, prompting the derivatives expert to conclude that something "snapped" roughly around that time, or as Kocic said, sometime in 2012 it was as if the markets “lost their capacity to deal with uncertainty.”

Bank of America takes a somewhat different approach, and instead of looking at the divergence between volatility and news - or shock - flow, highlights the moment BTFD became religion.

According to Bowler, "the nature of volatility since 2014 has entirely changed, with volatility shocks retracing at record speed. Investors no longer fear shocks, but love them, as it is an opportunity to predictably generate alpha." This is demonstrated in the following stunning chart which not only shows that every VIX dip is now just an opportunity to buy it, but that the market's "fragility" is at an all time high based on the surging frequency of vol spike events, which in turn, and paradoxically, reassure investors that a central bank backstop can not be too far away.

BofA is hardly the first to point out this phenomenon: almost exactly one year ago, it was JPM's "quant wizard" who highlighted precisely the same, if not through the perspective of VIX but the overall market response to recover from "shock" events:

It appears that the time horizon of macro traders has shortened, likely as a result of increased participation of machines and algorithms that are quicker to adjust to significant events and can eliminate trading activity of slower investors. Consider for example the US elections - traders in Japan registered a 5.4% Nikkei drop on the 9th, followed by a 6.7% rally on the 10th, while S&P 500 investors did not register a significant close-to-close move over the election (due to market hours difference). These two days were enough to shift the volatility regime (usually calculated from closing returns) for the whole of 2016 for the Japanese equity market, and leave it unchanged for S&P 500 (e.g. think of rebalancing needs of a hypothetical risk parity fund, or a short volatility strategy based on Nikkei vs. one based on S&P 500). We also noticed that for a number of significant catalysts this year (Brexit, US Election, Italy Referendum) broad expectations were wrong both on the outcome and the directionally forecasted impact. It is possible that the lack of market reaction (or a reaction that went against the accepted narrative) was in part driven by investors’ reluctance to transact (“two negatives equal a positive”).

Ah yes, the infamous "investor reluctance to transact", which has only gotten worse as we hinted in our "trader paralysis" post, and which Goldman demonstrated vividly just last month when the bank showed that hedge fund turnover has now dropped to an all time low as virtually nobody trades anymore.

Whatever the reason behind the broken market, however, whether it is central banks, machines, algos, risk parity funds, vol-targeting strategies,  self-reinforcing "Pavlovian" dynamics, or simply traders no longer trading, the question is what comes next? While we will have a more detailed breakdown in a subsequent post, here are Bowler's three questions, and several answers of what to expect in 2018:

As we enter 2018, three questions are top of mind when it comes to volatility:

  1. Is 2018 the year when vol begins to normalize, or is this the “new normal”?
  2. As low vol threatens to sow the seeds of the next crisis, how will this end?
  3. Where does vol go in the longer-run; can we ever see the old-normal return?

 

Vol likely to rise off extreme lows; ’87 crash unlikely, but so is VIX averaging 20 While we will look at each question in more detail in turn, the short answers are:

  1. Higher not lower vol: We think 2018 is most likely to see higher (not lower vol) as the Fed builds more “ammunition” in terms of rate-hikes leaving them less sensitive to financial market conditions (i.e. pushing the Fed put strike lower), and as CB balance sheets peak in 2018.
  2. Vol bubble more likely to deflate than explode: While the risk of “fragility” shocks due to positioning and feeble liquidity is high, we think the level of leverage today, which is lower compared to the last time vol was this depressed (2007), does not present the same risks as then.
  3. Vol to remain low vs. long-run average: However, to the extent we remain in a low inflation/low rates environment, we may also remain in a lower than normal vol environment. So while VIX near 9 is an unsustainable bubble, VIX at 20 (the long-run average) may also be unsustainable in a slower growth world.

And BofA's conclusion:

What to watch for? In a world slaved to rates, inflation remains key

 

From a macro perspective, we continue to believe unexpected inflation is the kryptonite for volatility. Inflation presents a “triple whammy”, first driving economic vol higher, destabilizing bond markets (and putting bond/equity correlation at risk), but importantly handcuffing central banks from being as sensitive to financial markets. In other words it both drives fundamental risk higher and significantly impairs the protection markets have become dependent on. Rising rates vol is key to watch.

 

How bad can it get? From here Aug-15 shock likely but ’87 crash is improbable

 

Interestingly, while the world is hyper-focused on how big the “short-vol” trade is, history shows that any liquidity shock large enough to create an equity bear market (20% fall in equities, similar to 1987 or LTCM crisis) provides a forewarning in terms of rising volatility first (look for S&P vol to double from 10 to 20). Fragility shocks (similar to Aug-15) that happen without warning remain the bigger risk today in our view.

 

So, how do you trade this? Long “vol beta”, cheap options for direction

 

The most important question is, how do you trade this environment where investors have given up on risk (or have learned to love it as buying dips has been “free money”). Evidence of a “bubble in apathy” is strong, and we believe it is unsustainable. However, the problem with any bubble is not recognizing you are in it but rather timing its end. Hence the key is finding trades that will profit from a change in environment but carry well and hence don’t require perfect timing. The beauty of today’s low vol is that it can be cheap to own optionality (for example for upside stock replacement) which affords the benefit of not having to time when markets may peak.

 

Does this mean short vol is a bad idea? No, but it needs to be smartly managed

 

Importantly, believing that today’s low vol is unsustainable does not mean all short vol positions are bad. Don’t forget, owning any risk asset (equity, credit etc.) is a short-vol trade. The key is finding the best short vol opportunity (highest risk-adjusted returns), while managing downside risks appropriately. Harvesting rich vol risk-premia is key to funding cheaper long vol positions elsewhere.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Bill of Rights's picture

Every ninth year volatility rises, guess where we are headed...

Osmium's picture

Higher valuations?  Market can't go down, earnings are just too fkn good!!!

eclectic syncretist's picture

Of course the Federal Bankster cartel of criminals feels like they have to keep the stock market propped up. They've stolen all of Mom and Pop's money by purposefully directing huge inflation (medical expenses, insurance, tuition, housing, rent, food, gas, ect.) ZIRP (no reward for saving), and the death of dividends. Having had their money (and their future) stolen from them, the salt of the earth people no longer have the wherewithal to buy in when/if the next downturn in the stock market occurs. So the Banksters only recourse is to cover their crimes with more crimes, namely, buying and selling stocks to make sure the market doesn't irreversibly fall.

robertsgt40's picture

Has anyone factored in what happens when the dollar croaks?

spastic_colon's picture

the moment the market broke? the moment the market broke? 1914

Manipulism's picture

and why nobody mentions algos any longer?

They took over.

Was a big thing at times.

 

buzzsaw99's picture

yeah, sure, a buyable dip is going to come along any minute now.  whatever.

lester1's picture

2014 was the year the unaudited Federal Reserve started buying stocks to keep everything propped up!

Seasmoke's picture

You have to time the collapse just right or you will be broken and crushed before it does.

totenkopf88's picture

A lot of guys shorted housing too early in 05,06,07 and went broke doing so

vegas's picture

The equity markets, and most notably the stock indices,  changed in Feb 2016, when the FED made the concious decision to save the oil industry and started buying crude oil futures. Since that event, only "Brexit", the U.S. election, the "Trump dump" in May of this year, and the most recent "Brian Ross bear market", has the SP500 had any downside action, and all of these were quickly thwarted by the "Plunge Protection Team". Stocks must never be allowed to go lower ever again ... it's a matter of national security now.

 

www.traderzoogold.blogspot.com

totenkopf88's picture

Yes- early 2016 was really a pivotal point with oil and commodities set to totally roll over- like bone-crushing commodity deflation 

Dante Inferizzo's picture

Have you figured out who the oil insider is at Shepwave yet? GOOD calls there and in gold.

shizzledizzle's picture

Have you figured out how to fuck off and die in a fire yet?

bobert727's picture

Nobody cares who the goat blower is a Shlepwave

Ajax-1's picture

His name is Jack Meoff and he's a dick.

Dante Inferizzo's picture

The Shepwave traders have eliminated the need for algorithms   KEEP IT UP GUYS!

This week's market calls have been spot on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

bobert727's picture

Always promoting the losers at Shlepwave......if they were so good you wouldn't have to promote

 

Business must be slow huh?

A1 T's picture

Their trade calls have been dead on. Any trader in hedge probably already uses them. We have. Whole group using one Id. 

adr's picture

The market is nothing but a computer simulation of an economy that doesn't exist. The Fed chair is the architect of the Matrix that is supposed to usher in paradise for all, but somehow is only leading to dystopia.

Sadly the market doesn't offer enough yield, so after 2014 the big manipulators moved to crypto currency where there are no pesky regulations and competition for con games. You can't fight the Fed so go play where they aren't. When the market truly died in the Spring of 2016, it is no coincidence that the crypto market truly took off. The stock indexes are make believe, so why not create a new multibillion dollar market out of thin air.

Virtual tokens for internet memes somehow became more valuable than half the businesses in the world. I don't care what you think about cryptos, but that is truly fucked up.

Ankhenaten2's picture

Buy fastbrick robotics listed on the asx(Australian stock exchange with ticker: FBR )

 

THEY have the patented first robotic bricklaying robot that can build a house in a day:

 

https://www.fbr.com.au

gonediving's picture

What if it all changed because CBs actively short vol as part of their stable of tools? That and predictive models which give them the ability to enter the market at key technical points. The combination of which turns the market.

fulliautomatix's picture

Sure they short vol. but it is a secondary result. They buy equities and hold them (effectively take them off the market); they print money so that your preference is to hold shares in something real, not fiat; they buy bonds offered by companies they own shares in to support the share price. They end up owning everything - but I don't see how that is a good thing for anybody.

Ankhenaten2's picture

Buy fastbrick robotics listed on the asx(Australian stock exchange with ticker: FBR )

 

THEY have the patented first robotic bricklaying robot that can build a house in a day:

 

https://www.fbr.com.au

venturen's picture

why not...central banks GUARANTEE EVERYTHING print massive amounts from thin air....I never thought they would be just so straight up criminal.

Once again wrong!  Will be fun when they start string up the people behind this...and they will

Stormtrooper's picture

END the FED, bring back Capitalism and restore free money, if anyone remembers those quaint things.