This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Bob Janjuah: S&P At 800, Dow/Gold Ratio Will Hit 1 Before Next Real Bull Cycle
Bob Janjuah, who has been quiet lately (recall his last piece in which he quite honestly told everyone that "Markets Are So Rigged By Policy Makers That I Have No Meaningful Insights To Offer"), is out with his latest, in which he gives us not only his long-term preview, "ultimately I still fear and expect the S&P500 – as the global risk-on/risk-off proxy – to trade at 800, and the Dow/Gold ratio to hit parity (currently at 8, down from an all-time high of 45 in late 1999) before we can begin the next multi-decade bull cycle", but also his checklist of 8 things to look forward to in the short-term centrally-planned future.
From Nomura's Bob Janjuah
Please sir, can I have some more?
The current monetary policy settings in the US and Europe – which in my last note I dubbed monetary anarchy – continue to drive markets. While some may feel that central bank behaviour and experimental policies designed largely to boost markets is a good and desirable thing, I have little doubt that such ‘economic policies’ are already sowing the seeds of our next economic and markets malaise. I continue to believe strongly in the view that central bankers are intentionally mispricing the cost of capital, in an attempt to push the private sector to misallocate capital into consumption and into asset purchases at the wrong time and at the wrong price. Eras of such marked misallocations of capital normally end with bubbles that burst significantly. Central banks have shown us, time and again, that they are extremely good at driving bubble formation, that they are extremely good at denying their real motivations, and that they are extremely good at denying the existence of bubbles. History of course also shows us, over and over again, that bubbles are the direct consequence of central bankers mispricing capital, and history of course shows us that central bankers are largely impotent when it comes to preventing the significant bursting of said bubbles.
I think pump-and-dump policies, which have driven the Western cycles of print/borrow/consume over the last 20 years – and in particular over the last 10 years – are an undeniable economic failure. What is even more concerning to me is that, even after everything we have been through, the policymaker solution for our current sickness is more of the same – more debt, more liquidity, and more consumption! The West is in the midst of a multi-year era of declining living standards, in large part as a direct consequence of central bankers and their bubble blowing machines. I think sometimes those focused on markets and how to make the next buck out of the Fed/ECB ‘put’ should remember that, for example, it is at least in some part as a direct consequence of the Greenspan and then the Bernanke policy ‘puts’ that tens of millions of American citizens are either homeless and/or on food stamps. When the current post-2008/09 bubbles burst, central bank ‘puts’ and the arrogance we perceive that still persists in some parts of the financial sector will hopefully be consigned to the deep freeze box for a very long time.
Moving onto the more tangible near term:
1 – The extremely bullish seasonal and weather factors that in my view have artificially boosted (US) data over the 3-4 months to end-March are now over, and over the next 3-4 months are I feel instead going to be a material drag. It has already started, and by late Q2/early Q3 the eco bulls will I feel, once again, be left scratching their heads. For 2012, trend growth in the US will, in my opinion, be closer to 1.5% than 2.5%.
2 – The US consumer is in a weak and vulnerable position. Savings have been run down, to worryingly low levels, house prices are still falling, but the jobs picture is already turning down and gasoline prices are up nearly 20% from the December lows – and rising.
3 – The earnings season, which is about to start, will in my view be average at best – and this is merely a continuation of an already weakening trend, where weakness is actually quite significant outside of a very small single handful of individual companies.
4 – Now that we have moved on from the systemic crisis in the eurozone, it is now becoming clear to an increasing number of people that we have merely swapped a dramatic V-shaped collapse-followed-by recovery for a long-drawn-out period of weak growth. In my view, the eurozone will – at best – contribute nothing to global growth, perhaps for the next 3 to 5 years. If Spain ends up as the next Greece, then the picture will, in my view, be much worse.
5 – China is definitely ‘landing’, and policy easing is well behind the street’s expectations. I continue to have little doubt that China is transitioning from a 10% growth economy to a 7% growth economy this year. And over the next 3-5 years, that growth rate could be closer to 5% or less. I remain concerned at how little focus is given to the very poor demographics in China, and I remain concerned at how little focus there is on the state of the ‘banking’ balance sheet in China, and on the true levels of underlying indebtedness that exists in the Chinese economy.
6 – Over the next quarter or two I think there is unlikely to be any more money magic from the ECB – unless of course Spain really implodes. But in my view the market seems transfixed by Bernanke and his throw away promises. I remain convinced that we will NOT see any new real QE this year. Why? Simply put, more QE in the US would merely take gasoline prices up, perhaps by another 20%. This would, in my view, guarantee an abrupt halt to growth in the US and would likely ensure an Obama electoral defeat. This is not an outcome that Bernanke would desire. So at best, either in the June or July meeting, we will get some form of TWIST.
7 – Over the next few weeks we could see the ratings agencies move towards a wholesale downgrading of the global banking sector, driven by the application of new ratings methodologies. The markets seem extremely complacent on this issue.
8 – I assume no international military conflict in Iran.
So in essence, reflecting the economic truism that is ‘MV = YP’, I still see a world and markets more driven by the ‘M’ rather than the ‘V’ – and in Q2, more shots of ‘M’ are going to be elusive and ultimately what will actually be delivered will fall well short of market expectations. Also in Q2 the data (earnings and economic) will likely be weak. And in particular, the consumer is going to struggle and will I think be forced to re-save. Put all this together and I think in Q2 we should expect a nice 10% equity sell-off, with the S&P500 falling from 1420 (+/-20) to 1280 (+/-20). Credit should continue the sell-off of the last few weeks (iTraxx Crossover up at 750/800), and rates should rally with 10-year UST yields back below 2%, perhaps even down at 1.75%.
As we get later into Q2 I think the shrill promises of more fixes of ‘M’ from Bernanke will get loud, and many investors remain underweight risk, having missed out on Q1. As such, the expected correction should not exceed 10%. Over late Q2 and Q3, we could – likely should – see another leg higher in risk, driven by TWIST. This shot of ‘M’ may have a very short half-life in terms of boosting markets – four to six months perhaps – with the presidential elections clearly being the target. Much beyond early Q4 I think things will look extremely challenging, with the lack of self-sustaining growth/end demand, the lack of growth in Europe, weakening EM growth and the US fiscal debate being the key agenda items. I continue to believe that while equity prices may surprise on the upside in Q3/into the US elections, late Q4/early 2013 and the (lack of) growth and US fiscal stories could herald the next stage of the post-2008/09 ‘M’ bubble, i.e., the next major equity bear market.
Clearly fiscal and central bank activism and experimentation have, to date, succeeded in stretching out the cycle, but ultimately I still fear and expect the S&P500 – as the global risk-on/risk-off proxy – to trade at 800, and the Dow/Gold ratio to hit parity (currently at 8, down from an all-time high of 45 in late 1999) before we can begin the next multi-decade bull cycle. I think the battle between central bank inflationist policies and the natural cycle of deflationary debt deleveraging will continue to be attritional, and it may drag well into 2013 and 2014. I do however remain hopeful that in the next 12-24 months we will see both the basis form for the next major multi-year cycle of global economic development and we will see risk asset valuations at truly ‘once in a lifetime’ cheap levels. We are not yet at this point.
- 26731 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -


You'll be on your knees soon enough, Blythe...
We can only hope that the paper tower has enough spark beneath it to burn the whole thing to the ground. When they start publicly denying it, they are running scared.
If Spain ends up as the next Greece, then the picture will, in my view, be much worse.
Spain, Ireland, Italy, Portugal.........I really don't have a favorite. Whoever makes it first.....I'm good with it.
Gold bitchez!
I think there is a broad unwritten assumption being made here with respect to the multi-decade bull cycle to follow -- namely that at some point while at or near the bottom the Goats wrangle the Sheep into dispatching the money changers and ridding the planet of their ilk forever.
A Further Downside Run in Gold and Gold Stocks is Coming! Here’s Why -- Posted Monday, 9 April 2012
By Nu Yu, Ph.D.
Chart looks very convincing.
http://news.goldseek.com/GoldSeek/1333976700.php
Gots to be kidding. Multi-decade Bull Cycle?
Well, after a multi-decade Bullshit cycle I think we can expect a multi-decade stink!!!
I call bull-shit. try multi week bull cycle before the beeg dump.
It's all over bar the shouting and the hiss-trionics.
ori
/truth-about-america
They MIGHT be able to keep inflating the pig up until 2020 but not further.
We are all going back to an agricultural society, unless some technological miracle occurs.
http://www.truthistreason.net/peak-civilization-mit-club-of-rome-predict...
Thanks for the link Koffie.......Club of Rome, the name says it all. And a resource controlled techocracy is the plan. And MIT is probably in on it.
In fact, the net is a huge data-feed into the Club of Rome model, which is why they cannot kill it.
ori
Koffieshop
"We are all going back to an agricultural society, unless some technological miracle occurs."
You mean those technological miracles kept under wraps because they either destroy profit margins or destabilize the present power structures?
wiithout fossil fuels, the carrying capacity of the US farmland would be about 50 million decently-fed. 25% of the land needs to be set aside to feed your draft animals.
Now you know what the 450M .40 cal hollow-points are for.
duo
Just about what organic farming would bring in.
Without fossil fuels, you won't be going to work either. That leaves enough time for organic farming on one of America's stupidest obsessions: Grass lawns.
+1000
one of America's stupidest obsessions: Grass lawns.
The taxpayer is paying for the repairs, and care of the lawns, and shrubs,trees,landscaping,home interior repairs, etc, unti they find a suck, er buyer.Even more stupid is Fannie n Freddie have 200k empty homes, and the American How do you like that lil factoid, your paying for foreclosed homes repairs and lawn maintenace.............some shit is just to unreal to believe.
Now you know what the 450M .40 cal hollow-points are for.
Useless unless your a sheeple.......................
A handgun is what you use to fight your way to a rifle.
Guess they think that will take the place of several hundred billion rifle rounds purchased like a mutha since '94?.
They're for close encounters of the roadblock and riot kind...not for great plains warfare! It's DHS, not the army. How many drivers / protesters / rioters will be toting AKs and 50cals?
How many drivers / protesters / rioters will be toting AKs and 50cals?
A ton, if they want to live.
You dont carry a AR, or a AK in your vehicles??................shame on you.
No need for .50's..............................just something with a little edge on range.
Where do people dream up these numbers? The US population in 1900 (back in the days of steam locomotives, horse-drawn ploughs and less productive food strains) was 76 million, and it was exporting food to the world!!
The first diesel tractor came out in 1935 (population: 128 million).
Oh, and BTW, fertilizers (phosphorus, potassium, nitrogen and trace minerals) don't come from oil.
i-dog wrote:
"Oh, and BTW, fertilizers (phosphorus, potassium, nitrogen and trace minerals) don't come from oil."
Where do they come from? Nitrogen from nat gas (Haber-Bosch process), phosphorous and potassium from depleting mines.
Even 1860's US food production was not sustainable! Literally billions of passenger pigeons were killed and eaten. 4-guage shotguns were used to kill "sitting ducks" a score at a time. Nitrogen and phosphorous came from Chillean and Pacific island guano, now almost totally depleted. Potassium came from burning New England forests just to harvest the ash (look it up!).
Due to topsoil erosion and depletion of guano resources, without fossil fuels the US can feed less people than it could in 1900!
As Gail Tverburg (an actuary) puts it in dry actuarial terms, "There will be excess deaths".
What have "depleting mines" or "nitrogen from nat gas" (ie. methane) got to do with my statement "from oil"?
Oil doesn't now, and never will, replace phosphates from guano resources or potassium from wood ash*...other solutions are needed. It is a common misconception that fertilizers come from petroleum.
I agree that "there will be excess deaths" -- from the 310 million bloated bottom feeders of today -- but not [just] because of oil.
What I questioned was the "50 million" estimate of a sustainable US population -- in a world where both food and luxuries are traded between nations that can produce one or the other, or both...just as the US was feeding Europe in return for luxuries a century ago.
* [edit] From wiki:
I think maybe the point was that regardless of where the fertilizers come from, they have to be mined and then transported, which in itself is energy consuming.
The other major factor that people tend to ignore is that it doesn't matter how much we can produce going back to an oil-less production process. It isn't about physical production, but about politics.
If anyone thinks that the government won't nationalize or at least regulate to the point of complete misallocation, all of the ag land and resources needed to farm it, you're dreaming.
We live in a different world than in the 19th century. By executive order, the land you use to produce the food (or at least the food you produce on the land) will belong to the state, not to you. Attempts to avoid government controls in allocation of resources will mean you discover the meaning of NDAA up close and personal.
Without OIL you end up at around 1830's 1860's economics. That means very localized production, storage and consumption. Your 50 million may be a bit high.
Cheap oil not only allowed greater yields per acre, but also let us get affordable food from thousands of miles away.
As the price of oil climbs, fertilizer will still be used, but more local production will be needed to eliminated the transportation component of food production.
Small, urban farms are already making it by catering to organic and heirloom market niches.
Backyard gardens eliminate even more of the oil component of food production. Don't rule out the possibility of a hybrid agri-techno solution in which tele-commuting and a home-based agrarian lifestyle merge to allow a solution without hunger, turmoil, or catastrophy.
This would be the best-case scenario and I really hope this happens.
Still, a lot of people are going to die before things could stabilize like this. We'll still have the peak-industry chaos.
"Don't rule out the possibility of a hybrid agri-techno solution in which tele-commuting and a home-based agrarian lifestyle merge to allow a solution without hunger, turmoil, or catastrophy."
And what do TPTB get to steal from us if we are all self-sufficient?
A self-sufficient populace does not make banks rich not does it make the people "need" the politicians to save us. Therein lies the problem. Its never about what is good for each individual. And the scenario you describe does not appear to be one of expanding debt/credit, which is the source of power/control for TPTB.
And also this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOMWzjrRiBg A thorough explanation of the inevitable resource depletion.
Could the person who downgraded me (and prevented me from editing the post) explain why he thinks that this is bullshit? I'm curious about counter-arguments.
Koffieshop
"Could the person who downgraded me"
Up/down voting is just another form of control. The weak care about the public perception of who they are and will correct their ways.
Meanwhile the rest of barely even recognize names.
It isn't like we will be attending the kids graduation, now is it?
Oh believe me, I'm not looking for public approval. I AM looking for someone to argue with.
You said there may be technological breakthroughs that are kept secret. Even if you assume this is true (and those breakthroughs drastically improve the efficiency of travel and production) we are still fucked. We will just continue to grow exponentially until we hit a new limit. As explained in the movie I posted, improving the efficiency of resource use just makes us use more of it, not less.
Koffieshop
"Even if you assume this is true (and those breakthroughs drastically improve the efficiency of travel and production) we are still fucked. We will just continue to grow exponentially until we hit a new limit."
I'm not certain it happens that way. I think new technologies arise to circumvent new limits.
I think that is one of the signs of a technologically superior society, limits are continually expanded and broken.
It's hard to tell since we are the only dominant species we know and have a very tiny window of technology.
Knowledge is ever increasing. Modern mankinds problem is we think we understand everything. When in fact we understand very little.
I'm not even being optimistic, I've just watched a lot of change over the years and a lot of assumptions shot down.
Man cannot innovate a path to infinite growth, without defeating the laws of thermodynamics. We will certainly do our best to do so, as the stakes are pretty big.
The laws of thermodynamics only apply to closed systems. Earth is not a closed system. Oh and guess what, there has never been a law in science that hasn't been broken.
a technologically superior society, limits are continually expanded and broken.
Technology is very expensive.
It's kinda like genetically engineered plants. "Gonna save so much time and feed the world." Need more equipment, herbicide, seed expense. Poisons the people, water, bees. Longer term effects create long term medical issues and expense. Increases the need for stronger herbicides. Cycle repeat.
Correct. There were some inventions, like the water-injected carburetor, that could have tripled or quodrupled our gas efficiency back in 1950. Shell killed some whistle-blowers, seccured the patent, and burried it. At this point in the game, implementing any new technology or infrastructure will be difficult, especially with an insolvent government. Localization, particularly in food production, is already baked in the cake at this point. But don't hold your breath. The Gov knows that a mob of protesters in fear of starvation is the only type of mob that changes anything.
I didn't downgrade you but... 'Club of Rome'?... Seriously?? CLUB OF ROME???
Here's how a CLUB OF ROME thesis plays out...
1. Make a prediction about resource depletion & population reduction
2. Spray the atmosphere with chemtrails for a decade
3. People die off
4. Club of Rome (Rockefeller, Kissinger, Gates, Clinton, Gore, etc.) all remain as kings & custodians
~~~
Neat gig if you can get it
Killing people would only slightly delay the inevitable, even of they psychopathic enough to think about that it should have occurred to them that it is pointless.
The only meaningful and inevitable thing that can occur right now is the destruction of the system that depends on perpetual growth.
The only technological miracle that'll keep us from going back to an agricultural society is the "miracle" of a hundred million sheeple waking up and putting their personal weapons technology to its proper use.
Poppycock.
Meanwhile the Worlds oil resources continue to run out. I can't see guns filling in the energy gap somehow unless said guns end up significantly reducing the population. Unless that's what you meant? Also, I thought the main protagonists of Gun Control say that "weapons" are for self defence, not killing.
We are all going back to an agricultural society, unless some technological miracle occurs.
Is there an ap for that?
After we hit rock bottom, go through that and slide deeper into the earths core, I to believe we'll start a new bull cycle. In about 15 to 20 years from now.... When we're old guys...
The Kurzweil Singularity is the light at the end of the very dark tunnel we approach.
Unless we go the way of the Mayans first.
Can there really be a bull cycle - or a bear cycle - if market forces are eradicated? The current U.S. administration is doing its best to eliminate free market forces while picking 'winners' (GM, Solyndra) and forcing others (think the coal industry) into a corner. It appears that Obama and friends are intent on imposing a command economy while destroying the middle class and enslaving most of the population. Call it fascism if you will, but the question I have is this: can a stock market exist in any real sense when all is done at the behest of the government? Did Nazi Germany have a stock market? What about the Soviet Union? (Apologies to younger U.S. readers who were not told about those countries while undergoing public [re]education.)
Does anyone track their predictions like Market Ticker?
I see a lot of people making predictions, but few (if any) coming to pass.
I wonder what the hot air to got it right ratio is.
http://www.theonion.com/articles/the-recovery-is-here-reports-underemplo...
'The Recovery Is Here,' Reports Underemployed Man Making $20,000 Less Than He Used ToCARBONDALE, IL—Citing the fact that he's now able to make the minimum payment on his credit cards each month and is back in the workforce making $20,000 less than when he was laid off in 2009, 43-year-old Tom Baker declared Tuesday that the economy was recovering by leaps and bounds. "The tide is turning!" said the man who had to sell his four-bedroom home for less than what he owed on it and move his wife and three children to a cramped apartment 800 miles away. "My company just hired 50 skilled contract employees with a guaranteed eight months of paid employment. America is back!" Baker said that if the economic turnaround continues, he may be able to save enough money to send at least one of his children in for a dental checkup.
Grabbing the tail of the elephant, the blind man proclaimed that an elephant is just like a snake.
Geezer, it's a freak'n satire.
The Dow-Gold ratio will go way below 1:
http://chart.ly/o5ck9k2
Well that DOW/GOLD ratio can hurry up already. I hope the whole thing crashes and burns, In the mean time AAPL and PCLN go up everyday.
Both had outside days yesterday so their panic uptrends are now in question:
http://chart.ly/vehyoxs
http://chart.ly/n5m9cxq
AllWorkedUp
I hope the Russians or Chinese start mining Gold on the moon or in the asteroids.
Fuck it, I just hope someone strikes a huge vein so I can laugh when it drops as low as tin.
Beavis is that you?
Idiot. While it is commerically viable (over 30 years) there is that little thing called the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty that specifcally bans that type of activity.
The Geneva Conventions forbid torturing. That worked out well.
From that chart,it looks like the mean is about 5.
Assuming a 50% reduction in the stock "market",that gets
us a sell point in the 7500 to 15000 USD range allowing for a
temporary over reaction and price overshoot.
Thanks for the chart.
I'm thinking 4500 bottom then 6000 for the 1:1
A little too hopey-changey there at the end.
No doubt. He pretty much ignores the fact that we are in the middle of a global financial crisis, the likes of which the world has never seen. His assumptions completely ignore the odds of multiple Euro sovereign time bombs, and the inevitable war with Iran.
basically he's doing the best he can without swallowing the red pill.
All markets are irrational. They are driven by human emotion and there's nothing rational about that. True, there needs to exist some underlying fundamentals, but the degree to which markets can swing from what is rational is.....limitless.
Why limitless? Because the madness of crowds knows no bounds.
Forecasting market indexes is a sound way of measuring human emotion.
www.bullandbearmash.com/index/sp-500/
Whether it's JPM or Goldman or they guy in his basement, all humans experience the same emotions.
I didnt know algos had emotions!
Is rigged an emotion?
Why does everyone assume the plutocrats want Obama to win? He does not bow down before Israel as well as the Republicans do.
He does what he's told to do... They all do...
Count the carriers off Iran and say that again.
Hahaha. Mitt and Obama both do what they are told; that is, put on a good show so nobody notices the looting of the USA treasury. They can put 2 more battle groups in the Gulf, but I am more convinced then ever that there will be no -- US involvement (direct) regarding any military action against Iran; unless Israel tells Obama (or Mitt) to jump.
Assuming that 'the plutocrats' exist - a point on which most on ZH seem to agree - can we safely assume that they are unified in outlook? Any group can, and probably will, have factions disagreeing with each other on subsidiary issues. The leaders of the American Revolution had a common goal - independence - but various factions had different ideas about what to do once independence was achieved. The Nazis had an immediate goal of achieving power. Once that was accomplished they had to purge certain elements of the Nazi party. Same with the Bolshevik takeover of Russia. People like Lenin and Stalin didn't play well with other erstwhile allies once power was attained.
Who is to say that they are all Zionists or pro-Israel? Some of them may be pro-Sunni or more specifically pro-Wahabism. Or pro-Isis/Osiris. Not being one of them, I can't tell.
Addressing GMasScientist, whose reply preceded mine: Would not the House of Saud be as glad to see the Iranian Shia regime brought down as would Israel?
'8 – I assume no international military conflict in Iran.'
Ransquawk:
'Iraq oil exports via Turkey halt on sabotage according to Oil Ministry'http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/ND11Ak02.html
The Dow - PPI ratio shows how ridiculously overvalued the paper stock market is relative to real things:
http://chart.ly/6qyu5hm
Bob is totally ignoring the Spanish problem. He thinks "we have moved on from the systemic crisis in the eurozone"...while we have only kicked the fucking can down the proverbial road....
Something's wrong in Euroland?
@Confundido
The way it read to me, it looked like he was working on a US2012ELECTIONCENTRIC model... Frankly ~ it was kind of boring...
As for Spain ~ all I can possibly say is this... The first major signs with regards to Greece (vis-a-vis default) were more than 2 years ago (publicly)... If they managed to kick the can that long I'm sure even with a half-life of Spain can kicking, it takes is thru November...
Yawn... Keep stacking (& stop driving)...
And the can came to a stop immediately.
the DOW doesnt need to fall much for this to happen. 10,000 gold?
mv=yp? the p was defined as "price level" which no one has yet to figure out.
Bob has been wrong for many years now, which is why he's moved firms. He's a publicity man who gets attention for the firm via his bearish calls. He is a marketing man. Beware
Bingo ~
He's kind of like 'Prechter' without all that EWI voodoo (who change wave counts more often than RobotTrader blows hot & cold on yesterdays chart movements)...
"not surprised if equities rise in Q3 ahead of the election"
Wow. Me either.
does he actually get paid for this?
I missed it, too. Was there some information here?
I like Bob, but anyone who gives predictions this precise is a fool
O.K. This is the guy who told us to short the S&P at 1000 - 370 handles ago. That ranks right up there with the ZH calls to sell BAC at 5 and buy cocoa at the highs.
Man. I miss Robotrader.
Well, we know for sure these guys are rarely ever right with their predictions, and none of them really see the big picture. They just call for a market level expectation, then it surely will be better later. Fascism sucks, no matter what a rigged index says.
ANother perma bear waiting for armegeddon...recon Normura not short 100BIL in CDX
I think people forget the demographics argument when combined with fed easy money, they dont have to be easy forever, only for another 8 years until the next gen of people the size of baby boomers really hit the workforce to rebalance social sec,etc, so the gold bull has lots of room to run regardless of how the world hates gold right now.....print, coast, print, coast, thats how it will go. When a car is driving generally uphill, it requires the driver to continue to use the gas pedal or it will head back dwnhill o dont get ucked into buffett stupidity, how well a performer has he been for the last 10 years? Hes a great bull mkt strategist, arent we all!
Well yes sure it could play like that, but it could just as easily play out with gold/S&P parity at 8000. As the author stated in his earlier piece about market manipultation. We can assume that the banksters want more of everything, with Ben and his brethern at the spigot. Question really is: How do they go about it? I'm with the likes of Sinclair and Faber on this one: They will print to continue the wealth transfer. Therefore both stocks and gold will rise relative to all fiat.
Of course part of the scam are periodic shake outs to keep everyone unbalanced and confused.
I used to buy into the Gold/Dow 1:1 idea...
Nowadays, I'm more wondering how that's going to work if the dollar collapses or gets re-valued...
I'm thinking the dow gold will hit parity arond 6000, unless they keep this madness up to support the markets. If that is the case gold will run much higher as they are getting diminishing market returns on dollar printing.
Seriously? Calling for 800 S&P before we rocket off to the next multi-decade bull market....these guys pine for the good times too desperately. We're screwed, and its not an index price that makes fascism any better for you and me.
I've never done this before, but one ought to do a YEN/GOLD ratio chart to see what the next 25 years might look like if they manage to keep kicking the can & keep the sheep entertained...
Fascist tyranical dictatorship is not fun for anyone, no matter what an index level is.
So right, Dog. I agree with everything this guy says.....for the most part........until we reach the statement about how after the melt-down we somehow start the game all over again, growth from SOMEWHERE in SOMETHING for SOMEONE magically returns and we start a new "bull market". Give me a break! Screw growth! Growth leads to slavery as the sheeple are convinced that without "x" they somehow can't have a meaninful, happy life and start working overtime to pay for the loan they took out to buy "x". If we finally get this thing to implode, lets hope we learned some lessons like there are more important things in the world than "bull markets".
Why do you hate Capitalism, Ayn Rand, and Jesus?
Capitalism? I have not seen Capitalism for decades in the US.
Ayn Rand was an Atheist, so she hates Jesus too.
funniest comment of the year so far
Correct statement -
"I continue to believe strongly in the view that central bankers are intentionally mispricing the cost of capital, in an attempt to push the private sector to misallocate capital into consumption and into asset purchases at the wrong time and at the wrong price."
Net outflows from private accounts indicate the strategy has had limited success. Credit, in part, the internet. Although much bad information can be quickly distributed, it also only takes one knowledgeable person and a keyboard to counter a well-constructed, well-connected, back room plan that would have been easily implemented two decades ago.
TPTB already know the future, it has been pre-planned. The current emerging police state should be a big clue; the incremental destruction of the Bill of Rights is almost complete. The 2nd Amendment problem will be handled quite easily through nationalization of all ammo and gun producers. Race riots will be subtely encouraged as a distraction. The current systematic PM manipulation is another clue. Previously they allowed the gold price to stair step higher; now the price is frozen within a limited range. Obama will be re-elected, voter fraud will be epidemic. The issue of Obama's illegitimacy will be immaterial.
We're so totally FUCKED
TPTB: 1 You: 0 in a quick forfeit.
No matter the merits of Bob's letter, it is obvious that these markets are not "free" as they used to be, up and down on economic cycles and business news and developments. So why bother. To make a few pennies or dollars, just to lose it again a week later. Nope, not gonna go there. I will just sit here on the sidelines, day after day until reality sets in. One week, one month or a year or more. It wil happen. The Fed and govt. are NOT bigger than the markets. And our markets are global. At some point it will right itself and then we can invest.
Until then I just keep making the same phone call. Fed EX driver and us are on real good terms. :)
And one small positive note all: HUFF POST
Wells Fargo Slapped With $3.1 Million Fine For 'Reprehensible' Handling Of One Mortgage
that is 1 mortgage.
'Markets' are totaly controlled by criminal banksters, so what good does it do to read the market level tea leaves? At this point, its all totaly irrelevant.
It makes me laugh, these people that look at charts and explain where theyll go next when all theyve done for years is pump in fake money and build a totaly fake market, based on 0% free money. How anyone can take any of it seriously at all is fascinating human behavioral lab.
So, gold will come down to $800 then?
He said DOW / Gold at parity, not S&P.
I am looking for $6,000 / oz.
They say Gold, Guns, and God. I have the gold (and silver), I have the guns (and ammo), all I need is a a good priest (but typically I'll leave the God part to the unprepared).
That, and my hot Belarusian wife.....cause what is living through the choas worth if I still can't have sex!
one (1) Half oz gold eagle will buy you the DOW before the end of the decade, maybe for a short period of time, but it will do it. Also, 30 to 50 oz of gold or 500 to 700 oz of silver WILL BUY YOU A MEDIAN HOME IN US before the end of this decade as well...so, keep stacking that shiny stuff
I like to run all these things through the George filter, or WWGS:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BB0aFPXr4n4&feature=related
+infinity, Bobby Bear
The mere fact that 99% of the mainstream media does NOT acknowledge this, proves to me that this is only accelerating.
nothing about the upcoming Diablo 3 release?!
great post.
Bob almost hit the nail on the head. Comparing the price of gold to the Dow (or S&P) is a perilous thing given the stranglehold the central banks have on paper pricxes.
One really should look at the units of exchange between countries / trading partners. What is backing the "full faith and credit" of the fiat currencies today? The answer is - a Printing Press.
This condition cannot continue...Gold is a defacto currency (apologies to Princeton PhDs.). Gold is a liquid , cross border, hard asset that can be used to store value on an international basis. Silver similarly, howvever with a few qualifications.
Given the irredeemable amount of fiat sloshing around in the world today, unless one supports a barter system based on a basket of commodities a hybrid gold standard will be required to maintain any sense of order in Int'l trade.
Bernanke's position on gold, as ridiculously naive (stupid? ...purposefully dishonest?) as it is, has painted the Fed into such a perilous corner, that the gold trade wil be truly parabolic when it hits.
Timing..? Impossible to forecast, given the Bernanke gold position, but .."in a stunning development China, Russia, Brazil, and 25 other traqde surplus nationas have told Bernanke that they have valued the USD vs Gold at $5,000/oz, and will expect either payment in USD based on that price or accept gold bars in lieu of".