• Sprott Money
    04/29/2016 - 05:58
    There is unfortunately no basis for renewed optimism that this current litigation will have any meaningful impact on precious metals manipulation – with respect to either silver or gold.

Charting This Year's Cross Asset Chaos

Tyler Durden's picture




 
0
Your rating: None
 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 12/06/2011 - 11:18 | 1950805 Jonbutterfly
Jonbutterfly's picture

The house of cards will fall when the last debtor can no longer pay . . . and then we will see Mad Max in the Western World.

 

http://djia.tv/press-tv/whoops-why-everyone-owes-everyone-no-one-can-pay...

Tue, 12/06/2011 - 11:38 | 1950873 JPM Hater001
JPM Hater001's picture

I will be one of the Interceptors.  Good news, the Dodge Chargers of today are faster and safer when attacked by traveling gangs of hooligans.

Tue, 12/06/2011 - 11:21 | 1950813 LongBalls
LongBalls's picture

That chart hurts my eyes. Pun intended.

Tue, 12/06/2011 - 11:22 | 1950816 GeneMarchbanks
GeneMarchbanks's picture

'4. Bank funding concerns (Cross currency basis swaps) remained high through the year'

Just go ahead and keep that in the red. Indefinitely.

Tue, 12/06/2011 - 11:24 | 1950825 AngryGerman
AngryGerman's picture

where's the bofa economic viability column, that is completely red??

again, i don't listen to dead people...i let my vodoo priest do that for me

Tue, 12/06/2011 - 11:31 | 1950852 GeneMarchbanks
GeneMarchbanks's picture

Now now... don't be impolite. Zombie is the proper term.

Tue, 12/06/2011 - 12:00 | 1950959 AngryGerman
AngryGerman's picture

sorry, even in these times i should take the time and remain politically correct...

 

Tue, 12/06/2011 - 11:30 | 1950844 I Eat Your Dingos
I Eat Your Dingos's picture

Zombie apocalyspe would be far more exciting than global meltdown. I guess the meltdown would do

Tue, 12/06/2011 - 11:50 | 1950909 Dr. Engali
Dr. Engali's picture

Is that a thermal image?

Tue, 12/06/2011 - 11:56 | 1950943 machineh
machineh's picture

Yes, it's King Kong.

You can see his 'eyes' in columns 7 and 2, in late April / early May.

And boy, does he look pissed!

Tue, 12/06/2011 - 11:53 | 1950925 unununium
unununium's picture

Don't forget the AZO indicator.  AZO posts $191M profit, but $310M was paid out to earlier investors (indefatigable stock buyback).  The circus continues.

 

Tue, 12/06/2011 - 12:25 | 1951073 slewie the pi-rat
slewie the pi-rat's picture

 

july...risk off...zombie calls...

  • france was breaking the UN covenants by dropping weapons into libya, britain was giving itself  false figures about the cost...
  • zeroHeads were calling fuk_u "recessionary"
  • inflation was getting transitory
  • troikas & finiMinis in clown cars; islands for sale?
  • oh, yes...QE2 was ending and the US was abt to form stuporCongo, raise the debt ceiling, and have ronPaul introduce a bill about the $1.6 T @ the FED being "owed to ourselves"
  • as i rode my bike toward the fireworks show, for the last 5 blocks i could hear every speaker from the fairgrounds blaring this song:  Cee-Lo Green – Fuck You (Lyrics On Screen) KillerHipHop.com

risk-0ff, BiCheZ!

Tue, 12/06/2011 - 13:45 | 1951417 Piranhanoia
Piranhanoia's picture

Is it a good idea to rely on the statements from employees of companies that are known to have bribed every public official with their hand out?  That have sold and resold the same product to 15 buyers at one time, each buyer believing they were getting a unique security.  Leveraging themselves 100 times the value of every asset they have, marked up to its full fictional value, and 960 times if you mark it to reality.  Defending companies they purchased by any criminal means necessary to pretend the actions weren't fraud when they created the product, and aren't fraud now knowing you are defending a crime,  and in the case of Countrywide, we know that as much as 100% of what paper products they created were bogus.

And this isn't just for BofA that is DOA,  this is for all of them.

How can the words of someone at these firms now be taken seriously?  How could it get past the screeners at the top and be truthful?  Just because they are talking about what they allege are someone else's assets?  Because DofA is talking about Europe, they are supposed to be believed?  They have $1T exposure to Europe and every reason to lie with breathing.  

Make sure everyone digs the snark, as it is proving to be some of the only valid reporting on behind the scenes in fantasy land.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!