This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

"China Will Not Hesitate To Protect Iran Even With A Third World War"

Tyler Durden's picture


Fast forward to 2:08: "It is puzzling to some that Major General Zhang Zhaozhong, a professor from the Chinese National Defense University, said China will not hesitate to protect Iran even with a third World War... Professor Xia Ming: "Zhang Zhaozhong said that not hesitating to fight a third world war would be entirely for domestic political needs...." And don't forget Russia, which recently said it is preparing to retaliate against NATO and has put radar stations on combat alert: "Russia is another ally of Iran, with similar policy to that of China. Toward Iran." Watch, and please forward the entire video, for an explanation of how China is approaching the situation not only in Iran, but a perspective of how they view the western "threat", as well as what tensions they face domestically.

h/t Scrataliano


- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:11 | Link to Comment bernorange
bernorange's picture


Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:15 | Link to Comment 55 men
55 men's picture

Courtesy of John McClane,

"Yippee Ki Yay, Mother Fucker".

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:22 | Link to Comment JoBob
JoBob's picture

Courtesy of John WHO?

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:34 | Link to Comment trav7777
trav7777's picture

good luck with that China...I hope these idiots don't actually believe they can fight any kind of war with anyone

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:46 | Link to Comment theXman
theXman's picture

For those who are not familiar with General Zhang, he is not a serious military figure but a TV personaility. Because of his many wrong predictions during the 2nd Iraq war, he became a laughing stock, a Chinese version of Baghdad Bob.

Party bosses let Zhang run his mouth to please the ego of conservative audience and give Chinese government a macho apperance. He is a tool and a clown, nothing more. 

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 18:11 | Link to Comment CompassionateFascist
CompassionateFascist's picture

"WW III"? According to the Newt, it'll be at least WW V or VI.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 18:56 | Link to Comment redpill
redpill's picture

China isn't going to war any time soon, even if/when we do insanely attack Iran.  This is more about heightening rhetoric on all sides.   It needs to sound really dire so that the sheeple in each respective country unite together and stop being dissonant.  That's what this truly is about.  That's why we have a war every ten years.  Support the President dropping bombs on Iranian children or you don't support our troops and are anti-American!

Iran will get a nuclear weapon one way or another eventually no matter what we do, but if there's anything that's going to prompt them to try to use it, it's going to be to get revenge on countries that think it's OK to bomb or invade them for pursuing military technology that many other countries already have.  It's ridiculous.  But the reality is that Iran doesn't want nukes to use them, Iran wants nukes so they can come sit at the adult table and don't get treated like a child.  They aren't going to use them because it would be suicide, and they know it.  Even the insane leaders of radical movements that advocate suicide bombing always get some other poor schmuck to volunteer and do it for them, ever notice that?  These guys aren't interested in dying.

Aggression fuels aggression.  More destruction is not going to solve this.  But of course it's not intended to solve anything.  War, by and large, is a means by which control is reasserted and power consolidated.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 19:15 | Link to Comment knukles
knukles's picture

Why can't we all just get along?
This is the same way they treated Brittany.

(hysterical sobbing)

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 19:48 | Link to Comment Spirit Of Truth
Spirit Of Truth's picture

Maybe there's a reason China is building SPARE CITIES!!!

Thu, 12/01/2011 - 00:07 | Link to Comment old naughty
old naughty's picture

Yes. But they are not for us humans. Most of us will be dead, or dying after the nuclear war, no?

Thu, 12/01/2011 - 01:27 | Link to Comment Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

China is building spare cities because they can!  They are using the dollars they have and they are building huge unoccupied cities.  And if it sounds like I am about to channel Trump I am not.  Trump should applaud China for investing in America for the last 50 years.  I do too, because a good investment shows. 

But if China stays invested, they will lose all of their money.

How funny is it that China went along with Fed policie today?  Tied at the hip, I tell you.  And guess what?  All falls down.

Thu, 12/01/2011 - 09:31 | Link to Comment Spirit Of Truth
Spirit Of Truth's picture

China's central planners see Western market economies as a means to their ends, i.e., learn and copy the technology developed from "free societies", then use it to efficiently destroy us and dominate the free world.  They don't care about anything but power and control, and those willing to believe otherwise are useful stooges as they pursue their global designs at our expense.

The "Old Enemy" never went away, it simply changed it's camouflage:

Thu, 12/01/2011 - 09:50 | Link to Comment Spirit Of Truth
Spirit Of Truth's picture

Note that last bit in the Chinese news report above: "Russia is another ally of Iran, with similar policy to that of China toward Iran."

This is key.

"The failure of U.S. policymakers to comprehend the veiled aggressiveness and hostility towards the United States inherent in Sino-Soviet strategy and the belief that the political and economic reforms in Russia and the partial introduction of capitalism in China have foreshadowed these countries' development into real democracies, have eroded the effectiveness of U.S. policies in the foreign affairs, defense, intelligence and counter-intelligence fields.  U.S. policymakers have recklessly accepted the premise that Russia and China are no longer enemies, but are rather potential allies and partners fully deserving of U.S. support.  Only countries like Iran, (pre-2003) Iraq and North Korea - which (ironically, in this context) work secretly with Russia and China - are still considered potential adversaries." - KGB DEFECTOR ANATOLIY GOLITSYN, THE PERESTROIKA DECEPTION, 1995, P.230

Thu, 12/01/2011 - 00:16 | Link to Comment AldousHuxley
AldousHuxley's picture

IRAN is China's favorite bitch.

China is the pimp.

Russia is the don.

America is baywatch.

Thu, 12/01/2011 - 01:27 | Link to Comment Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

America is Pam? 


Wed, 11/30/2011 - 19:24 | Link to Comment treasurefish
treasurefish's picture

Exactly!  The only folks who would give you a thumbs down haven't taken the recommended single dose of the red pill.  The Chinese also don't war.  They know everything they manufacture is junk.  Good luck firing a rifle that breaks after a single shot, or gets lead paint in your skin.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 21:34 | Link to Comment Lednbrass
Lednbrass's picture

Im hoping this is sarcasm, if not its pure stupidity from an idiot who knows nothing about weaponry.  Their rifles arent are actually quite reliable, there are many thousands of rifles in the US imported from China in the 90's which are good solid rifles.  I like my Chinese milsurp SKS alot, it never ever malfunctions and is an excellent semi auto carbine. Their AK's are also quite good. Norinco screwed up and got busted by the FBI for offering to sell real heavy weaponry in the US or alot more would be over here, but it is a great mistake to think that they build rifles for their own military as haphazardly as they do goods to sell to Western suckers.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 19:45 | Link to Comment Rainman
Rainman's picture

In other words, it's all about the oil.....

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 20:27 | Link to Comment trav7777
trav7777's picture

bbbbut...bbbbbut...jewTV tells me that they would annihilate Israel just as soon as they managed to achieve fission!

Thu, 12/01/2011 - 00:19 | Link to Comment AldousHuxley
AldousHuxley's picture

the vision is to make the middle east oilland part of Israel + Saudi Kingdom.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 22:08 | Link to Comment madmax1965
madmax1965's picture

Yes indeed redpill and "war is a racket"! TPTB are setting this one up perfectly.  This shit is getting very exhuasting! 

Thu, 12/01/2011 - 02:17 | Link to Comment Freddie
Freddie's picture

The Chinese want us to start a war so we can bomb their new empty cities.  This will allow them to rebuild newer empty cities.  Our bombs will take down the new buildings before the shitty construction takes them down fairly soon.

Our endless B-52 strikes will help revive their constructions sector and reinflate their property bubble.  Caterpillar will sell them new CAT's graders and bulldozers.  Endless war is good for business.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 18:35 | Link to Comment krispkritter
krispkritter's picture

We had ZZ Top.  They have ZZ Not...Baghdad Bob indeed...

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 18:36 | Link to Comment YBNguy
YBNguy's picture

So down twinkles on Ragnarok it is.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 19:49 | Link to Comment earleflorida
earleflorida's picture

Re: General Zhang

'there is much truth to be said of a fools errand,... splintered upon a freudian slip'

"Tailor's Dilemma'       {[humor-- practical and otherwise] [chinese wit & humor c.1946___edited by george kao / introduction by lin yutang]}

"A tailor was cutting a suit for a customer. He turned the piece of the material over for a long time without being able to bring himself to use the scissors. The apprentice boy finally asked him why he hesitated, and the answer was: 'If I cut something out for him there will be nothing left for me; if I cut something for me there will be nothing for him"        jmo

fwiw dept:

 ,... do we have a 'false dichotomy'; a 'morton's fork', suspended 'in`medias`res' predicated upon the obvious 'kafkaesque-situation - or just a machiavellian ploy hubris?

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 20:46 | Link to Comment Tijuana Donkey Show
Tijuana Donkey Show's picture

The chinese Rush/Beck?

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 20:52 | Link to Comment BigInJapan
BigInJapan's picture

Yeah, he's an asshat.
You're honma fight ww3, are you?
How is it you plan on moving troops?

Those brownteeth couldn't invade Taiwan if they wanted to.

Thu, 12/01/2011 - 02:55 | Link to Comment i-dog
i-dog's picture

They don't need to invade Taiwan. They've already got a Trojan Horse president in there (ironically named 'Ma' - which means horse in Chinese - LOL)!

Thu, 12/01/2011 - 05:21 | Link to Comment merizobeach
merizobeach's picture

Sadly correct.  January 14 will be presidential elections; re-electing Ma will be the end of Taiwan's nationhood.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 23:51 | Link to Comment Belteshazzar
Belteshazzar's picture

Thank you for pointing this out. The headline of this post allows the reader to interpret General Zhang's statement as though it was an announcement from China's government when in fact this is not the case.


Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:47 | Link to Comment Zeilschip
Zeilschip's picture

Your pathetic Pavlovian spamposts on anything relating to China are getting boooooring.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:55 | Link to Comment PaperBugsBurn
PaperBugsBurn's picture


Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:49 | Link to Comment Silenus
Silenus's picture

Yes, they can fight a war with anyone - they have lots of nuclear bombs. If it comes down to WWIII, it'll go nuclear.

Just don't expect a long life for yourself or anyone else. Learn to embrace death.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 18:27 | Link to Comment onthesquare
onthesquare's picture

"long live death"  Jose Astray

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 18:54 | Link to Comment Uber Vandal
Uber Vandal's picture

There is only one God, and his name is Death.

And there is only one thing you say to Death.

Not today.

Quote begins at 1:31

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 22:47 | Link to Comment connda
connda's picture

"Yes, they can fight a war with anyone - they have lots of nuclear bombs. If it comes down to WWIII, it'll go nuclear.

Just don't expect a long life for yourself or anyone else. Learn to embrace death."


Long: freezed dried foods, subterranean bunkers, and potassium idiode.

Thu, 12/01/2011 - 02:20 | Link to Comment Freddie
Freddie's picture

Just don't expect a long life for yourself or anyone else. Learn to embrace death.

Is this the new Hope & Change for 2012?

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:50 | Link to Comment PaperBugsBurn
PaperBugsBurn's picture

I guess Chinese nukes aren't nukes at all and slanty-eyed, mass produced anti-ship ballistic missiles won't put an end to tge era of your gunboat diplomacy once and for all, and of course, rednecks are smarter, tougher warriors tgan the Russians, Chinese, Iranians...etc etc

Bring it on, biatch!!!

EMP your ass back to the stone age, motherfucker.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 19:29 | Link to Comment Ropingdown
Ropingdown's picture

Chinese nukes ride atop missiles whose guidance systems were improved thanks to Raytheon, whose technology for missile guidance was sold to the Chinese due to a waiver the Clinton administration provided....just about the time CEO Michael Schwartz, having been refuse waivers for so long, wrote a big check to the DNC.   As with the young Medal of Honor winner who recently sued BAE Systems, we have to ask ourselves this question: Why should we ever let our sons get involved in a war which will have them facing the technical wonders we paid for with our defense research appropriations.  When we have to sell high-end defense technology to our most obvious military rivals just to keep our economy going, we've got a problem.  We're going to have to make a law mandating that the CEO's children or grandchildren have to be on the front line of any such war.  Maybe that will get their consciences going?  "Never happen!" you say?  Thanks for making my point.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 20:15 | Link to Comment Alpacanio
Alpacanio's picture

Notice how all crap leads somehow back to Clinton? I said it then, and say it now. He sold us down the river 1st. And we are going to pay for it the next 50 years...

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 21:24 | Link to Comment Jack Burton
Jack Burton's picture

Nixon opened China and began an era of US support for China's economic rise, which naturally has led to a military rise. Nixon was doing the corporations bidding, they wanted China as the new non-union workshop for corporate America to boost profits, destroy union shops and eliminate the US middle class. Mission accomplished! Mr. Clinton was nothing but a Nixon want to be and a sex addict who worshiped that thing in his pants.

Along the way Clinton learned that to be the president meant courting corporate America, a thing he did to perfection. I belive corporate America enjoyed the Clinton years even more than the Bush years. Bush/Clinton, so what was the difference?

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 20:48 | Link to Comment Tijuana Donkey Show
Tijuana Donkey Show's picture

Yes, but their made in China! Maybe they can tow them on that "carrier" they just launched. I'm no military fan, but the Chinese and US will fight a cyber war, and the loser is anyone who likes the Internet, running water, and electicity. 

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 23:03 | Link to Comment Axenolith
Axenolith's picture

I believe that would be Loral Space Systems, not Raytheon...

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 19:55 | Link to Comment SheepHerder
SheepHerder's picture

Do you have kids?  How about good friends?  A mom?  A dad?  It'd be something to print your post out and give it to you should you ever see their brains and guts splattered on a sidewalk due to a country doing just as you recommend and bringing it on...biatch.  Any middle schooler can sit at a computer and type out mindless drivel. But this isn't an episode of GI Joe's or X-Men we are dicussing.  Show some maturity along with intelligence and think about what you want to be brought.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:51 | Link to Comment AldousHuxley
AldousHuxley's picture

All China has to do would be to tell walmart they are cutting off shipment.

American underclass shoppers would go crazy when they find out they can't buy the latest junk on TV and will finally riot on the capital hill.


Plus the oligarchy who profit off of offshored manufacturing would go all out Koch bros on politicians to stop the "war".



Wed, 11/30/2011 - 18:00 | Link to Comment aldousd
aldousd's picture

I don't think you're right; however, it would be a sweet irony to see the riots happen because walmart was taken away instead of the traditional leftist mantra that it should be.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 19:16 | Link to Comment Manny
Manny's picture

Then who will they manufacture for ? And if manufacturing goes down what will those sweat workers do with nothing on hand ?  Not something those guys in Beijing would like them to do.

If anything, Walmart is our defense missile system for China!

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 20:02 | Link to Comment SheepHerder
SheepHerder's picture

Who will they manufacture for?  Themselves and other countries that show they can pay their debt.  If a person is maxed out on credit card debt, the store doesn't make and sell them goods, because they need something to do.  

And if manufacturing goes down what will those sweat workers do with nothing on hand?  Make it for their families and take it home.  I mean, aside from worthless paper with worthless contracts saying we will pay them back, what does the US exchange for the time, energy, and resources the Chinese give us in Wal-Mart goods?

Thu, 12/01/2011 - 11:41 | Link to Comment prole
prole's picture

Like it ore not those funny little ugly no-longer-artistic American mini paper-portraits of dead presidents have  magic power all over the world and anyone who owns oh say- trillions of them can buy the world. Japan tried it and semi-crashed lol but now it's Chinas turn and I think it's working.

So what are we giving China? The world. And our wealth.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 20:08 | Link to Comment HurricaneSeason
HurricaneSeason's picture

Maybe they'll manufacture TVs for African tribes in exchange for oil, gold, diamonds and crops. They might not need anymore toll roads or oil companies.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 23:58 | Link to Comment trav7777
trav7777's picture

with what electricity are those TVs gonna be powered?

Thu, 12/01/2011 - 11:45 | Link to Comment prole
prole's picture

There won't be any TVs. There will only be a boot in the face if the natives get restless. Whichever tribal leader gets paid off won't care what happens to the fodder, He (dictator) will be wherever dictators go for personal Beyonce concerts and etc etc.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 21:00 | Link to Comment BigInJapan
BigInJapan's picture

Finally, somebody who understands.

China fighting Europe, Japan, and North America in WW3? And to whom will the brownteeth masses then export their junk?
I'm feeling pretty smug today for inventing a new slur for the Chinese, I am.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 21:58 | Link to Comment thefatasswilly
thefatasswilly's picture

What a sad wasp.

It's China, Russia, Germany vs USA, Britain, France.

The former will win, for obvious reasons I've outlined here before. I suggest you read and think some more before you post, because you're coming across as a fucking idiot.

Thu, 12/01/2011 - 00:32 | Link to Comment BigInJapan
BigInJapan's picture

Oh, I've thought plenty, thanks.

Coming across like a fucking idiot who's got his ducks in a row.

Germany, the fattest military in the world? That Germany?

Russia, the drunkest COUNTRY in the world with an average life expectancy for men of 59 years? That Russia?

China, well, they'll tear themselves apart while the rest of us stand and watch, so pay attention when the grownups are talking, alright Willy?


Thu, 12/01/2011 - 04:00 | Link to Comment myne
myne's picture

Hah whats the us going to do when the strategic reserve recieves a bunker busting incendiary and no middle eastern or south american country will supply oil? What's a nimitz going to do against a barrage of inertial compensating over the horizon artillery shells? What's the cia going to do when the anti sattellite missiles roar to life?


China has those too.

Any way you look at it, China has counters to your toys, factories and has maintained better relations with suppliers. The US arrogantly shits in everyone's nest and assumes that they have some sort of divine moral superiority that makes its nukes the ultimate fallback, while no doubt it would condemn others with the same attitude.

Thu, 12/01/2011 - 14:07 | Link to Comment upWising
upWising's picture

Mr. BigInJapan!!   I have a question!! (hand waving frantically in the air).

"If we get in a war with the brownteeth and the Germans and the Ruski's, does that mean my Dad will have to get off the LazyBoy couch?  Will we still have TeeVee?  What will happen to Dancing With the Stars?   Will will still have the Grammy's?  Will we still have frozen pizza?"


Thu, 12/01/2011 - 21:38 | Link to Comment thefatasswilly
thefatasswilly's picture

You are an idiotic waste of oil, oxygen, and fresh water.

The worst part is, you believe that you are special, when in reality, you are less useful as a transformer of dead animals into shit than a pig, because at least a pig doesn't waste oil typing nonsense on a computer.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 19:21 | Link to Comment olo - that's th...
olo - that's the bird's picture

no worse. they'll stop making iphones at foxconn.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 19:37 | Link to Comment Teamtc321
Teamtc321's picture

Is that your true photo there AldousHuxley? 

Sat, 12/03/2011 - 04:07 | Link to Comment mkkby
mkkby's picture

Correct.  And if that doesn't get the message across, they can turn off the lights for the entire western world's factories.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 19:13 | Link to Comment He_Who Carried ...
He_Who Carried The Sun's picture

Germans to the front!

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 22:01 | Link to Comment thefatasswilly
thefatasswilly's picture

You're usually capable of rational thought, round eye. Your insecurity in the face of Chinese domination in conjunction with anglo saxon failure is showing.

Even if China can't take on America alone (which it can, because China will not be fighting in the west; the battlefield will be Eurasia. Think American Revolution, supply lines, and other such logistical thoughts), China won't be fighting alone, and I'm certain you understand just how deadly ze germans are.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 22:17 | Link to Comment Lord Koos
Lord Koos's picture

In a conventional war, the Chinese might do a lot better than you think.  (I use the term "think" loosely).  China the largest standing army in the world, and the factories to back up their military.  The US has no mfg base compared to WWII where we essentially won the war by being able to produce twice as many tanks, ships and airplanes as could Nazi Germany


Iran, the next Vietnam, only a bit more global in scale.  I predict disaster for the USA if they try to attack Iran.  Gas will be rationed and will cost at least $10 a gallon, for one thing.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 22:46 | Link to Comment Bruin4
Bruin4's picture

trav777 ,

You and your redneck flag waving buddies grossly underestimate the awesome power of the Chinese military. they would have us licking their boots in less than 12 hours, it will be the shortest war in history. Next to of course the war in Iran.....he he


Thu, 12/01/2011 - 02:25 | Link to Comment Freddie
Freddie's picture

As opposed to your muslim's 6 wars?   Bush sucked but the muslim is exponentially worse.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:44 | Link to Comment Thomas
Thomas's picture

They are just trying to rally the DOW another 500 points.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 18:43 | Link to Comment Temporalist
Temporalist's picture

Thomas my thoughts exactly. 

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 20:21 | Link to Comment AldoHux_IV
AldoHux_IV's picture

Not to mention that whenever central banking is at the core of problems with a global financial crisis, there tends to be a big distraction aka world war so that a 'Bretton Woods' type agreement can be made amongst the new creditor nations.

Even the jasmine revolutions are having an adverse effect as protests within developed nations have increased. The beast may have many heads (or squid may have many tentacles whatever you prefer), but will soon find it can not defend itself from the concept of inevitability.

The days of manipulation and schemes to move the markets/focus is coming to an end.  Those (all current central planners) who don't learn from history suffer the peril of repeating history-- and being on the wrong side of it.

Demand change within our government, cleanse the democratic process, end the fed, IMF, and Worldbank, and let's start fixing our damn economy already.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 18:12 | Link to Comment Piranhanoia
Piranhanoia's picture

You know,  "Riverboat ring your bell,  Fare thee well Annabelle, Luck is the lady that I love the best"  No?  Natchez to New Orleans,  Livin' on Jacks and Queens, Maverick was the legend of the West".   No?  

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 18:30 | Link to Comment onthesquare
onthesquare's picture

what ever you are smoking--I want some!

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 20:34 | Link to Comment Chuck Walla
Chuck Walla's picture

McCain - lock up all those crazy American Tea partiers. No, sorry, I meant McClane...

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:23 | Link to Comment dlmaniac
dlmaniac's picture

Hmmm, let me check Lockheed Martin stock first. BRB...

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 18:26 | Link to Comment Rahm
Rahm's picture

Yippee Yi Yippie Yay, which country's gonna get f-ed up today?

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 18:39 | Link to Comment YBNguy
YBNguy's picture

Pass the gun, spin the chamber, then pull the trigger.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:15 | Link to Comment HedgeAccordingly
HedgeAccordingly's picture

ENd of month closing print - #loose 

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:20 | Link to Comment Financial_Guard...
Financial_Guardian_Angel's picture

Russia, China, and the USSA are starting up a new game.

It's called: "Who can get to the oil first". Remember, there is only one winner 'cause everyone else dies.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:30 | Link to Comment MrTown3
MrTown3's picture

including the winner..

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:32 | Link to Comment PAPA ROACH
PAPA ROACH's picture

China should open the door for shiites to flood in........see how long the affair lasts.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:34 | Link to Comment MrTown3
MrTown3's picture

just more mouths not to feed...

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 18:22 | Link to Comment Kayman
Kayman's picture

Muslim/Atheist love fest. Whose got the soap ?

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 20:22 | Link to Comment Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture


Wed, 11/30/2011 - 18:22 | Link to Comment sleepingbeauty
sleepingbeauty's picture

This is the ultimate showdown of ultimate destiny...

and the battle raged on for a century
many lives were claimed, but eventually
the champion stood, the rest saw their better:
Mr. Rogers in a bloodstained sweater

Sounds like Canada, just sayin.
Wed, 11/30/2011 - 18:43 | Link to Comment CPL
CPL's picture

Ottawa and Toronto would be done the first volley.  Just sayin.  Want to avoid dying in a nuclear hell storm?  Africa.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 23:27 | Link to Comment thefatasswilly
thefatasswilly's picture

Africa? Are you joking? Way too close to Europe, which is definitely a high priority nuclear target.

I'd say New Zealand: no one really gives a shit about Australia, and New Zealand is even more worthless!

Beautiful, though :)

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 19:44 | Link to Comment Raging Debate
Raging Debate's picture

Oh no you deedint!!!

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 18:36 | Link to Comment onthesquare
onthesquare's picture

with a little moral support from the peanut galary.  Our very own teabagging, nut sucking prime minister from Canada.  Lets have a big hand for Heir Harper.

You guys get stuck with a turn coat liar and we have idiots voting for our very own, proud to be an North American Heir Harper.

How far up Obama's ass can our PM stick his head?

A little arsenic with your tar sands?

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 18:55 | Link to Comment AldousHuxley
AldousHuxley's picture

old game buddy


it was always about controlling trade routes and raw materials.


in a hierarchy in monkey society, the alpha males are always stressed out (higher blood pressure) from challenges from younger monkeys and younger monkeys always had to fight for their right to mate.


The most benefits go to aloof monkeys who don't give a shit and female monkeys who just mate whoever is in power.


No wonder US spends half of taxes on war (superpower paranoia), younger monkeys fighting for their status (China and Russia), the most benefits go to aloof monkeys like Luxemburg and female monkeys like Tahiti.

Thu, 12/01/2011 - 11:51 | Link to Comment prole
prole's picture

You are confusing 'superpower paranoia' with 'being someone's biatch.'

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 19:00 | Link to Comment imaginalis
imaginalis's picture

The new game will be for each leadership to see who can decimate each others populations the most while covering their recent and thieving criminal activities. WWW III will be desired, schemed and executed with high level cooperation. It's the end game and not to many moves away.

Thu, 12/01/2011 - 00:20 | Link to Comment s2man
s2man's picture

"to see who can" kill 1/10th of "each others populations the most" ???

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 20:37 | Link to Comment Chuck Walla
Chuck Walla's picture

Emperor Zero no want oil, he want buy from South America or anywhere Georgi Soros owns beeg interest.  Beeg Emperor no want too much oil so he can make 1% donors richer with more smart Solyndra deals.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 18:54 | Link to Comment Smiddywesson
Smiddywesson's picture

End of the world?

"Had to end sometime."  - Riddick

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 19:11 | Link to Comment True.North
True.North's picture

First proxy war in the new 21st century cold war?

US -> Israel vs Iran <- China

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 20:18 | Link to Comment Cthonic
Cthonic's picture

Never get involved in a land war in Asia...

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:13 | Link to Comment GeneMarchbanks
GeneMarchbanks's picture

So there's some good news. I'll rest easier tonight knowing iRan will be just fine.

America your war days are over.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:23 | Link to Comment Nascent_Variable
Nascent_Variable's picture

This move just solidifies Syria as the next target.  TPTB wouldn't know what to do with themselves if they weren't getting our kids killed in some fresh Middle East conflict, while burning giant stacks of money.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:26 | Link to Comment's picture

I think Libya was the last bone the SCO is going to throw us.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 21:41 | Link to Comment cranky-old-geezer
cranky-old-geezer's picture




Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:33 | Link to Comment Zero Govt
Zero Govt's picture

Let's friggin hope so

i for one am sick to the back teeth of one gobby spineless twat (US President) after another calling on God to "bless" them starting yet another illegal false-flag war against yet another weak low-tek defenceless country

the best deterrent is muscle ...China and Russia are big enough to keep the retarded Yank war machine in its seats thinking long and hard ...looks like Americas bully boy days are over (fingers crossed)

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 18:40 | Link to Comment onthesquare
onthesquare's picture

If US screws with China then it will be so long to made in Chinese crap.  The US will have to make everything themselves or get it from their friends, if they have any.  North America will have to support itself.  No exporting and no importing...Hey this may be worth a try.

Thu, 12/01/2011 - 12:04 | Link to Comment prole
prole's picture

Since (my guess- 25%?) of the productive Americans (the Americans who are productive) already support multiple redundant armies of parasites:

1- Actual Military or Foreign legion

2- Police state apparatus.

3- Those beaurocrats who are unarmed=  paid by the .gov who pretends to work and does not carry a gun.

4- Welfare State which means those paid by the .gov who do not have to pretend to work

5- Our overseas masters and their little oasis.

So considering 25% of Americans can support multiple layers of harmful parasites and themselves, I think they could support America itself, if they suddenly had to. (like they don't already?)

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:12 | Link to Comment Westcoastliberal
Westcoastliberal's picture

Uh Oh.  Here comes the Mother of all EMP's.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 19:24 | Link to Comment scatterbrains
scatterbrains's picture

could an EMP repel a PPT HFT ?


Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:12 | Link to Comment CClarity
CClarity's picture

I certainly hope there is some mis-translation if this is a legit video.

OT - What the hell is that dingleberry hanging around Maria's neck today?  Symbol of . . . . ?

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:21 | Link to Comment Cleanclog
Cleanclog's picture


  1. vulgar. A particle of fecal matter attached to the anal hair.
  2. vulgar. A foolish or inept person.
Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:27 | Link to Comment's picture

Q. Why are there no toilets on Star Trek?

A. Because they use phasers to zap the Klingons.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 18:03 | Link to Comment Joeman34
Joeman34's picture

What do toilette paper and the starship enterprise have in common?


They both circle Uranus looking for Klingons


Wed, 11/30/2011 - 19:11 | Link to Comment smiler03
smiler03's picture

How quaint, "toilette" paper ;O)

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:44 | Link to Comment CClarity
CClarity's picture


Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:35 | Link to Comment smlbizman
smlbizman's picture

she seems to have more shit in her mouth today than usual.......

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:12 | Link to Comment TeamDepends
TeamDepends's picture

The essential act of war is destruction, not necessarily of human lives, but of the products of human labor.

Orwell  1984

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:18 | Link to Comment NotApplicable
NotApplicable's picture

As once the products are all gone, the lives take care of themselves.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:18 | Link to Comment lolmao500
lolmao500's picture

So Orwell was like Krugman? War and destruction of goods is bullish since it means you need to replace the stuff, creating jobs!

Krugman and Keynesianism, right out of 1984!

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:29 | Link to Comment's picture

No. Orwell was saying that those who think like Krugman are wrong about war.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 19:19 | Link to Comment knukles
knukles's picture

Those who think like Krugman are just plain fucking wrong.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:31 | Link to Comment BKbroiler
BKbroiler's picture

Zorg: Life, which you so nobly serve, comes from destruction, disorder and chaos. Now take this empty glass. Here it is: peaceful, serene, boring. But if it is destroyed 
[Pushes the glass off the table. It shatter on the floor, and several small machines come out to clean it up
Zorg: Look at all these little things! So busy now! Notice how each one is useful. A lovely ballet ensues, so full of form and color. Now, think about all those people that created them. Technicians, engineers, hundreds of people, who will be able to feed their children tonight, so those children can grow up big and strong and have little teeny children of their own, and so on and so forth. Thus, adding to the great chain of life. You see, father, by causing a little destruction, I am in fact encouraging life. In reality, you and I are in the same business.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 18:16 | Link to Comment Manthong
Manthong's picture

Thanks for bringing that up..

I did not immediately associate Zorg with the Krugmanian flood fallacy. 

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 22:06 | Link to Comment Ricky Bobby
Ricky Bobby's picture

That was a great scene but I could never get milla jovovich out of my mind.

Thu, 12/01/2011 - 12:18 | Link to Comment prole
prole's picture

Zorg is championing the broken window fallacy perfectly non?

The act of breaking a glass or window, actual loss is the only result. After all the robot maids dance, the only result is productive robot time wasted and a perfectly good item, a glass, is lost.

Digging holes and refilling them would be better, only wasting time (like government work lol) but causing no actual harm. (Of course I'm wrong on that last point)

Zorg is a total idiot and 100% wrong. Destruction, disorder and chaos bring poverty famine and death. If people who think like him would smash their own head that would be the only destruction that actually helps the world.

Work labor and toil build roofs to cover heads from the rain and grow crops that feed hungry mouths.


Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:36 | Link to Comment el Gallinazo
el Gallinazo's picture

Read the god damn book! It is the training manual for the NWO.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:54 | Link to Comment Coronal Mass Ej...
Coronal Mass Ejaculation's picture

1984...sigh...almost 30 years ahead of it's time...

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 18:49 | Link to Comment muckraker
muckraker's picture

Have you even read 1984? It was Orwell's scathing indictment of what he saw as the emergence of totalitarian societies throughout the world and how he envisioned the world in the year 1984 (written in 1949). Believe it or not Orwell was not advocating for the dystopia he portrays in his novel. 1984 is didactic rather than exemplary.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:13 | Link to Comment 1835jackson
1835jackson's picture

Long Nuclear War Heads....gulp!

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:15 | Link to Comment Minoan
Minoan's picture

Only roaches and bankers will survive.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:20 | Link to Comment mayhem_korner
mayhem_korner's picture




Wed, 11/30/2011 - 18:26 | Link to Comment Kayman
Kayman's picture

A banker wears a suit.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 19:52 | Link to Comment Rainman
Rainman's picture

and sunglasses

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 19:08 | Link to Comment Sweet Chicken
Sweet Chicken's picture

There's an extermination service for roaches?!?

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 19:14 | Link to Comment Sokhmate
Sokhmate's picture

same difference

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 19:57 | Link to Comment Milestones
Milestones's picture

Franz Kafka will never write a book about one of them (Actually I think in the Metamorphosis it was a beatle)    Milestones

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:21 | Link to Comment The Disappointed
The Disappointed's picture

Same thing.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:24 | Link to Comment Global Hunter
Global Hunter's picture

Keith Richards too but for different reasons.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:38 | Link to Comment Zero Govt
Zero Govt's picture

his immune system is hardened like no other to any chemical or biological weaponary... par excellence from 40 years of the Stones (Stones by name, stoned by nature)

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:13 | Link to Comment GOSPLAN HERO
GOSPLAN HERO's picture

just a shit talker.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:47 | Link to Comment Thomas
Thomas's picture

Fastest moderator delete in history. Hardly had time to give that guy a thumbs down.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:53 | Link to Comment Messianic
Messianic's picture

That was about the most hilariously retarded post i've ever seen here.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:55 | Link to Comment Coronal Mass Ej...
Coronal Mass Ejaculation's picture

That is definitely what I would call a severe case of adult ADHD...LOL

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:56 | Link to Comment DavidPierre
DavidPierre's picture



Bon débarras... poubelles mauvaise!

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:13 | Link to Comment Black Forest
Black Forest's picture

Good news. Buy AAPL.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:14 | Link to Comment wisefool
wisefool's picture

Can we please find the price it will take to get Krugman to retire from public life? I feel like my avatar from a different movie... Paul "we need a war" Krugman is basically the Joker in Batman The Dark Knight.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:39 | Link to Comment el Gallinazo
el Gallinazo's picture

Yeah, we need the war, but he has to be politically correct as well, writing for the Toilet Paper of Record and "teaching" in Princeton.   So the war has to be with really ugly fucking aliens with testicles, I mean tentacles, bigger than Lord Blankfein's.  

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 18:42 | Link to Comment wisefool
wisefool's picture

@ Ms. Erable (below) I am one of these ultraNONviolence types. But I can understand peoples rage. I would offer for the agressive types that it is better to stop bad actors, but let them suffer the exposition of their acts as long as possible. 

@ el Gallinazo

Wait a minute. Thats it! Can we get some Ivy League economics/law review to

Publish the following article:

Macro Economic Aspects of when a person wins two Nobel prizes in Econ will basically save the world.

Chapter 1. I retire

The End. Paul Krugman, PhD.

Get the Nobel committee to rubber stamp it, Give him the prize for 2012. The aliens do nasty probes on human during recon missions. I do not want to know what they would do to us during Krugman's war.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:59 | Link to Comment Ms. Erable
Ms. Erable's picture

It'd cost about 40 cents to retire Krugman, but only if you use the cheap .30cal rounds.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:14 | Link to Comment Sudden Debt
Sudden Debt's picture




Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:15 | Link to Comment alagon
alagon's picture

If WW3 occurs, I'll move to Canada with my chest of gold.

Wed, 11/30/2011 - 17:20 | Link to Comment Al Huxley
Al Huxley's picture

Yes, nuclear winter will be much more bearable in Canada.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!