ES Opens -1% As Oil, Gold, And FX Carry Leak Lower

Tyler Durden's picture




 
0
Your rating: None
 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Sun, 11/20/2011 - 19:19 | 1896765 Captain Benny
Captain Benny's picture

Glad I have a few hundred calls on SDS :)

Its "transitory" that I'm exiting the paper market and acquiring physical... definately won't last forever, right?

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 21:06 | 1897135 The Fonz
The Fonz's picture

I too strapped on my brass balls and held my SDS options over the weekend. I am gettign that tingly feeling in my toes just like when the roller coaster starts down that first big drop. Good times.

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 22:19 | 1897305 DeadFred
DeadFred's picture

So can anybody who's good at the technicals say where the support levels are? I'm not great at this but I don't see anything but Fibonaccis for a long way down.

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 23:44 | 1897499 Napoleon
Napoleon's picture

666

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 23:50 | 1897509 DeadFred
DeadFred's picture

Always a magic number

Mon, 11/21/2011 - 00:10 | 1897546 qqqqtrader
qqqqtrader's picture

one of the ones I trust for market direction...

http://www.scribd.com/AndysTechnicals

nobody can call it right all of the time but AT seems to be on the right side of the fence most of the time.

Mon, 11/21/2011 - 14:37 | 1899395 The Fonz
The Fonz's picture

next support in S&P would be somewhere around 1115ish, and breaking through 1100, would be bearish. However I would guess that the move will take a break around 1100, either just above or below it unless things really crash.  I don't think we are going to spend much more time around the 1200 level, but it might be possible for it to go back up to 1200 on light volume perhaps, then reverse.  If the ECB steps up and prints all of this goes right out the window.

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 19:18 | 1896766 Yamaha
Yamaha's picture

Excellent!

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 19:19 | 1896767 SHEEPFUKKER
SHEEPFUKKER's picture

No debt reduction and gold tanks on the open.  Yeah, that makes sense. 

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 19:25 | 1896794 WestVillageIdiot
WestVillageIdiot's picture

Day to day movements now seem to be nothing but a loud noise.  This sure feels like batten down the hatch times.  Do the things you need to do and then try to feel comfortable.  Even that might not save you but it increases your odds. 

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 19:37 | 1896830 Darth..Putter
Darth..Putter's picture

That paper price should be more firm?

Mon, 11/21/2011 - 08:04 | 1897902 MFL8240
MFL8240's picture

Wrong!  Think in reverse if you want to understand this Ponzi scheme.

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 20:57 | 1897099 topcallingtroll
topcallingtroll's picture

Europe is a more immediate concern and all signs point to deflation.

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 23:49 | 1897508 Spitzer
Spitzer's picture

Thats bullshit

The Euro is its own bloc. If deflation was to exist then the Euro would rise. No debtor natons currency has risen in value as its economy imploded.

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 21:31 | 1897185 philipat
philipat's picture

Gold is being manipulated again by CB's via PD's.in the thin volumes of the overnight trade, where there is more bang for their fiat buck. Imagine if the demand for Dollars were to collapse and the Chinese instead store reserves in Gold?

Incidentally, not that I am a fan of the Euro, but 1.35 is actually at PPP.

Mon, 11/21/2011 - 07:58 | 1897899 MFL8240
MFL8240's picture

The whole country makes no sense.  Paper Gold is liquidating because no one wants Gold, they want paper US dollars. lol!!

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 19:19 | 1896772 RobotTrader
RobotTrader's picture

Looks like the record-breaking run in U.S. Treasuries is going to continue.

The "Mad Panic" into bonds is getting pretty crazy.

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 19:23 | 1896785 Dr Paul Krugman
Dr Paul Krugman's picture

The demand will stay because the U.S. is the strongest country in the world.  Europe should take a hint from the U.S. and fund their banks.  If they did, it would mean politicians could focus on unemployment instead of fiscal policy, which they know nothing about.  All the talk of austerity is crazy in this environment of mild inflation.

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 19:31 | 1896804 BrocilyBeef
BrocilyBeef's picture

Sorry, Paul, I'm not going to listen to your advice again until you at least start picking your dog's crap up off my lawn.

 

And have a nice jog.

 

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 19:33 | 1896810 WestVillageIdiot
WestVillageIdiot's picture

He doesn't own a dog. 

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 19:36 | 1896828 Dr Paul Krugman
Dr Paul Krugman's picture

It's true.  I'm a cat person.

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 19:55 | 1896902 BrocilyBeef
BrocilyBeef's picture

I like cats too!

 

Anyway, what happens "hypothetically speaking" if/when we aren't the strongest in the world?

I would assume the dynamics change a lot.

Is the United States Federal Reserve Note still have perceived value?

Do we still stand free of corruption?

Are strong in defense or do we lash out like a child?

Are we monetarily conservative or do we spend other people's money?

Are we still the free?

 

 

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 20:02 | 1896939 Dr Paul Krugman
Dr Paul Krugman's picture

We will be free as long as Republicans do not cut spending.  If we cut spending then we will have no defense, no jobs, nothing.  As far as corruption goes, politicians will sell their books.  This is why politicians should stay out of monetary and fiscal policy.  This is why the Federal Reserve, and other central banks like the ECB, should do the right thing and generate more spending by printing more money.

And the note will always have value.  What will replace it?  The renminbi?

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 20:06 | 1896954 BrocilyBeef
BrocilyBeef's picture

Okay, stop... not funny, this is just disinformation now.

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 20:41 | 1897046 DosZap
DosZap's picture

Dr Paul Krugman

Here we go again, we are SO in Debt, we need to spend more, so we owe more debt, to get us out of debt.

Sounds just like an Obama Cabinet Member.

No defense?.

Your shitting me?, we do not need to have  one soldier off the mainland to destroy the world 1000x's over, but we cant defend ourselves?.

We are a nation of 300 million plus ( over 80 million) weapons owners, and we are packing heat by the millions, and we know how to usethem IN A BIG way,but we cannot protect ourselves?????.

Left wing liberal horseshit if ever I read it.

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 21:15 | 1897117 Dr Paul Krugman
Dr Paul Krugman's picture

I think we could reduce military spending, but not overnight.  Bush got us into the wars overseas, and Obama is getting us out, albeit slowly, but he is.  If we pulled out at once it could destabolize the middle east and worsen the problem.

We are in debt but think about the percentage of debt to the additional debt.  We need to increase spending, and what better way to do that than by issuing some dollars that we can use to rebuild ourselves?  Spending one trillion dollars at this point is nothing, and if we had spent more in the first place, then we would not be in this situation.  We would have lower unemployment because we would have created more jobs.

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 21:20 | 1897165 Race Car Driver
Race Car Driver's picture

> Spending one trillion dollars at this point is nothing, and if we had spent more in

> the first place, then we would not be in this situation.

Somebody's fulla shit!

A Trillion anything is a whole shitload of something - so large, in fact, that you have to use something as small as seconds to grasp the enormity of a single Trillion - and we've racked up 15 of the fuckers with more on the way:

A million seconds is 13 days.
A billion seconds is 31 years.
A trillion seconds is 31,688 years.

A million minutes ago was – 1 year, 329 days, 10 hours and 40 minutes ago.
A billion minutes ago was just after the time of Christ.

A million hours ago was in 1885.
A billion hours ago man had not yet walked on earth.

A million dollars ago was five (5) seconds ago at the U.S. Treasury.
A billion dollars ago was late yesterday afternoon at the U.S. Treasury.

A trillion dollars is so large a number that only politicians
can use the term in conversation… probably because they
seldom think about what they are really saying. I’ve read that
mathematicians do not even use the term trillion!
Here is some perspective on TRILLION:

Trillion = 1,000,000,000,000.
Western civilization has not been around a trillion seconds.
One trillion seconds ago – 31,688 years – Neanderthals stalked the plains of Europe.

http://deanhunt.com/million-billion-trillion/

 

Consider that most folks only earn a few thousand d0llars a year... a number too small to be in the above example.

And... your trolling style sucks. It's not even humorous.

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 21:37 | 1897208 Stumpy
Stumpy's picture

Nice numbers. Now divide your time results by 7 billion.

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 21:41 | 1897220 Dr Paul Krugman
Dr Paul Krugman's picture

Economics is a science of percentages.  Income has increased X amount, so spending has increased X amount, no big deal.  Increase spending by another few trillion, and in terms of the quadrillions of dollars, the percentage increase is miniscule.

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 22:45 | 1897362 Vagabond
Vagabond's picture

That game only works in a world where infinite growth is possible.  Quit snorting pixie dust.

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 23:56 | 1897525 Spitzer
Spitzer's picture

Keynesianism is economic wtchcraft.

If anything you said was right, then why did Paul Volker raise interest rates to SAVE the dollar in the 80's ?

Mon, 11/21/2011 - 00:27 | 1897563 Dr Paul Krugman
Dr Paul Krugman's picture

Inflation is under 4% right now.  Why did Volcker raise rates?  Because inflation was much much higher then.

Mon, 11/21/2011 - 02:39 | 1897751 Spitzer
Spitzer's picture

haha

nixon imposed price controls at........drum roll please... 4% inflation.

 

Mon, 11/21/2011 - 01:05 | 1897646 StychoKiller
StychoKiller's picture

If we pulled out at once it could destabolize the middle east and worsen the problem.

MiddleEast stability?  Show it to me... Bwahahahaha!

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 20:42 | 1897052 JPM Hater001
JPM Hater001's picture

Million_Dollar_Bonus is that you?

you old dog you...messin with all the kids like the pedophile we all know you are...

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 19:37 | 1896815 disabledvet
disabledvet's picture

Yes. But you do not sound like Paul Krugman. Prove it to us by posting "die rebel scum!" three times while changing your avatar to an imperial storm trooper.

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 19:40 | 1896841 Dr Paul Krugman
Dr Paul Krugman's picture

You are upset that my methods have been proven correct?

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 19:46 | 1896866 disabledvet
disabledvet's picture

I'm easier to convince if you say "if only you knew the power of the dark side." I never understood the whole "no I don't want to rule the galaxy as father and son" thing.

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 20:04 | 1896947 chump666
chump666's picture

Well you are good at creating volatility in the market, ensuring that bond spreads are dysfunctional on moral hazard expectations.  In summary Keynesian voodoo will doom us all, major point being that oil at 90+ should take out China/France and Germany...

The only economic theory that I follow is "Sh*t happens"

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 20:19 | 1896975 Dr Paul Krugman
Dr Paul Krugman's picture

There would not be dysfunctional spreads if Europe nationalized their banking system!  Look at the U.S.  We bailed out the banks, and so our bond prices remain high.  We created demand, and so could Europe if they did the right thing and funded their debt obligations.

High oil prices are transitory.  Besides, the prices are high on new foreign demand from emerging markets, as well as increased demand in developed nations. 

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 21:07 | 1897133 chump666
chump666's picture

I see your point.  But you better hope that China/Asia still like their interest paid in a depreciating USD.  Otherwise the bonds will be junk and you'll get a steady, but persistent sell off - which is happening now. 

Re: the bond market being broken, well everyone is now reliant on the ECB to pump liquidity into the markets, narrow spreads etc.  Y'know 100% that inflation will follow very, very quickly.  The oil price is a very good hedge against the soon-to-be-pointless EUR and the USD.  Oil buying has started pre-winter, and on EUR hedges (bond market broke).

Also on Asia, that is the worry, they go into a major slowdown (China) all hedges will be taken out i.e commodities, what may be cyclical demand will become a bid-less market...a devastating wipe-out for the world.

Check the iron ore price.  China's 2008 stimulus 'program' is going to implode

The market needs a flush out and pain is part of that, as I have said, take the pain now then later (or it gets worst).  Be stronger for it.  

No one should be bailed out.

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 21:14 | 1897152 Dr Paul Krugman
Dr Paul Krugman's picture

I will admit that China has been in the commodities market, so if they go out then what happens?  Prices fall.  So if China decreases demand, which it sounds lile you think will happen, then this is deflationary.  So Europe spends more money fixing their debt obligations, they strengthen their bond market, and this creates prosperity.  Then commodities find equilibrium.  I don't understand what is so hard about understanding this.

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 21:29 | 1897180 chump666
chump666's picture

Dude I just trade in the markets.  I see chaos, that's all. There will be no equilibrium.  Just the end of a liquidity/money printing cycle. Go to Europe, go to LA, NYC, Oakland all these protests are based on the idea that everyone got gamed with   the 'spending' i.e it's helped nothing except the major players.

The debt markets will collapse eventually once the sovereigns cannot raise funds.  We can see this right now with Euro bonds, EFSF fund etc. 

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 21:38 | 1897204 Dr Paul Krugman
Dr Paul Krugman's picture

OWS is concerned with the fact that not enough was been done to help the middle class.  We could help the middle class if we taxed the rich and increased government spending.  The bond market is primarily the U.S. market, which is fine.  Europe is having difficulties, so they need to learn from us and nationalize their banks.

Mon, 11/21/2011 - 00:02 | 1897535 Spitzer
Spitzer's picture

You are clueless

The only reason the US debt market is strong is because the US freindly world (japan S Korea, oil states)is not ready to axe the US military yet. They are working on it though. They have no choice.  Still, its funny that the Fed ended up being the worlds largest holder of the debt just to fill in some cracks along the way.

It has less then nothing to do with fundamentals, spending or any bullshit that a keynesian can dream up.

Mon, 11/21/2011 - 00:21 | 1897570 Dr Paul Krugman
Dr Paul Krugman's picture

The U.S. military is too strong to be "taken over".  The Federal Reserve is holding some debt, but all creditor nations have increased their debt holdings, because demand for U.S. debt has increased.

Mon, 11/21/2011 - 02:51 | 1897756 Spitzer
Spitzer's picture

The largest holder is "some" in your mind ? Its the largest holder ffs.

The Eurozone one quite large net creditor that is decreasing their US debt holdings. US debt is being used and abused as a place to sit and wait. That is why everyone is piling into the short end, closer to the exists.

There is zero funamental demand for US debt. Holding a 30 year at 3% or less while inflation is at 4% is not a very good business practice.

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 19:41 | 1896844 navy62802
navy62802's picture

Oh God. ZH has been infected by a virus!!

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 20:00 | 1896926 Non Passaran
Non Passaran's picture

Paul, you need to see the doctor!

Sun, 11/20/2011 - 20:03 | 1896942 Dr Paul Krugman
Dr Paul Krugman's picture

No need to worry.  I am in good health.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!