This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Fannie, Freddie Parent Files Strawman Objection Against BAC Settlement - Sole Purpose Is To Strengthen The Settlement

Tyler Durden's picture




 

The FHFA filing an objection to the Bank of America settlement? Forget about it. After all should BAC implode upon having to fund another $50 billion in mortgage putback claims, and Countrywide have to be spun off and nationalized, it would simply mean that more capital would flow away from the already insolvent GSEs and to a totally new branch of taxpayer funded RMBS. Which is why are confident that the latest objection filed against the BAC settelement is merely there to weaken the case, or as Manal Mehta puts it: a Cover Your Ass filing because "they’ve pre-determined the conclusion and then will do the bare minimum discovery until they can jump ship and undermine the efforts of the rest of the objectors." Why else would anyone file a "conditional objection" whose sole purposes is " to reserve its capability to voice a substantive objection in the unlikely event that necessity should arise." Unlikely? Obviously this is Bank of America's higher power interest already doing all they can to prevent an out of control situtation getting even worse. Which after all is the whole point of why the Fed, Pimco, BlackRock et all filed the lawsuit in the first place: to ring-fence the total amount of cash outflow claims, instead of allowing Bank of America to experience death by a thousand lawsuits. In this regard, tonight's FHFA filing is nothing more than a wolf in plaintiff's clothing doing what they can to weaken the case against undoing the settlement.

Release:

Federal Housing Finance Agency Action Regarding  Court Consideration of Proposed Bank of America Settlement

 

The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), in its capacity as conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the Enterprises), today filed an Appearance and Conditional Objection regarding the proposed settlement between Bank of America and a consortium of 22 investors being considered by a court in New York. This pleading was filed to obtain any additional pertinent information developed in the matter. The conservator is aware of no basis upon which it would raise a substantive objection to the proposed settlement at this time. In fact, FHFA considers it positive that the proposed settlement includes subservicing requirements, specific terms for the servicing of troubled mortgages and the curing of certain document deficiencies. Additionally, FHFA is encouraged that a number of significant market participants support the proposed settlement.

 

Due to its duty to preserve and conserve Enterprise assets, the conservator believes it prudent not only to receive additional information as it continues its due diligence of the proposed settlement, but also to reserve its capability to voice a substantive objection in the unlikely event that necessity should arise.

 

###

 

The Federal Housing Finance Agency regulates Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks. These government-sponsored enterprises provide more than $5.7 trillion in funding for the U.S. mortgage markets and financial institutions.

Full filing below:

FHFA BAC

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 08/30/2011 - 17:17 | 1616634 IMA5U
IMA5U's picture

And that's why Buffet got a sweatheart deal on BAC and QE3 chatter dominates the media.

 

It is all just a smoke screen so people do not focus on this reality

Tue, 08/30/2011 - 17:18 | 1616638 tekhneek
tekhneek's picture

N-o-v-e-m-b-e-r P-U-T-S.

Tue, 08/30/2011 - 23:57 | 1617897 moonstears
moonstears's picture

Why, I did just that, today, got me some Nov BAC Ps at $7.50 strike! I hope to fuck you're smarter than me, as we're thinkin' the same, and I KNOW "me"!

Tue, 08/30/2011 - 17:27 | 1616657 macholatte
macholatte's picture

 

It's another stall, posturing, a game of file a motion and keep the litigation in limbo for another 30, 60, 90 days. More legal fees. BAC probably has 20-30 days to respond and then another 20-30 days to be heard by the court and then another 10-20 days to get an order written and signed off and so on and so forth. No settlement likely before Spring 2012.

Tue, 08/30/2011 - 17:39 | 1616688 IMA5U
IMA5U's picture

a sinking stock price can force the issue faster.  BAC's credit spreads will continue to blow out and the rest of the banks will follow.

Tue, 08/30/2011 - 18:01 | 1616738 Joebloinvestor
Joebloinvestor's picture

Wanna bet Warren sells after the election when Barry (if they don't stuff the ballot box) is gone?

 

Sometimes even preferred share holders take a kicking.

Tue, 08/30/2011 - 18:11 | 1616763 IMA5U
IMA5U's picture

he won't sell.  that 5bn gives him more leverage over the government for more sweatheart deals.

Wed, 08/31/2011 - 07:52 | 1618306 spanish inquisition
spanish inquisition's picture

So government bail out money goes in to rescue banks. Banks need additional help. Uncle Warren goes in to rescue banks with presidential guarantees and leaves with boatloads of governement laundered money.

Tue, 08/30/2011 - 20:03 | 1617102 Robslob
Robslob's picture

General Motors anyone...its whats for dinner!


Tue, 08/30/2011 - 20:09 | 1617125 Rollerball
Rollerball's picture

I'll warrant you Warran T Smorgasbord has preferred warrants.

Tue, 08/30/2011 - 18:13 | 1616766 Sequitur
Sequitur's picture

This was exactly my thought when reading the other filing in yesterday's ZHedge post. This latest post is important. Yesterday's filing was devoid of any substance. It was a token placeholder.

Now look at this one by FHFA. No one files an objection and puts as their leading paragraph praise for the very settlement they are objecting to. The only thing that matters in this document is the last sentence phrase: they are formally preserving their ability to speak up when it's time for the court to rule. And the FHFA can say and file anything it wants (read: ordered to say by the Administration, Buffet, Bank of America, and the banking cabal).

The politics surrounding this attempted cramdown must be immense.

Tue, 08/30/2011 - 18:15 | 1616772 chunga
chunga's picture

Translation: taxpayers stuffed with the tab, bonuses for TBTF, govt. enablers get their vig and enhance their CVs for when they move into the "private sector". Oh yeah...homeowners due process down the tubes as a delightful creamy topping.

Tue, 08/30/2011 - 18:20 | 1616784 MachoMan
MachoMan's picture

How the fuck is this not a per se violation of fiduciary duty/loyalty?  You can't eat your cake and have it too.  Either taxpayers got had via the GSEs and this shit has to get put back on the assholes up the chain OR the federal government has to expressly admit that the entire matter is a sham and that the GSEs are in fact going to hold the toxic sludge in a bailout to the banks, no matter the cost, and taxpayers will be forever damned (and they'll need a legal argument for how they're allowed to do so).

Federal False Claims Act?  Qui Tam?

This is complete and total bullshit.  As stewards and recipients of federal funds and guarantees, they have no ability to do anything other than to seek putbacks and/or rescission of the agreements whereby toxic sludge was put onto their books...  If the assets had appreciated in value since their transfer to the GSEs, I could understand wanting to keep them...  but we all know the opposite to be true...  and, as a result, there can be no basis for anything other than seeking to completely rid themselves (the GSEs) of the burden.

 

Tue, 08/30/2011 - 18:22 | 1616796 chunga
chunga's picture

Macho...do it! Qui Tam baby. There are a few going on now but are being kept very quiet!

Tue, 08/30/2011 - 19:02 | 1616940 MachoMan
MachoMan's picture

I can't do shit as I don't have a client with non-public information...  presuming this is even the type of thing covered by that...  I would think it's a possibility when the salesman is the originator, etc.  Of course, with TARP, etc., I'm not sure how that would work given the federal government can't sue itself...  incestuous bunch of dinglehoppers.

On a side note, I've got a gut lock on the state for a gigantic amount of money if the freaking supreme court wouldn't have dumbassed the FFCA to hell and prohibited the federal government from suing the states under it.  What the hell does separation of powers have to do with a situation where the federal government gives the states money?  If nothing else, it's basic contract law.  Unless of course the courts fuck it up.  The dissent was hilarious...  can't remember the case though.  Just remember the dissent basically took a shit on the majority.

Tue, 08/30/2011 - 19:15 | 1616979 chunga
Tue, 08/30/2011 - 18:32 | 1616827 topcallingtroll
topcallingtroll's picture

This one fact alone should convince everyone that we are ruled by an oligopoly.

Seriously isn't it time to start hanging some people?

Tue, 08/30/2011 - 18:37 | 1616845 Catullus
Catullus's picture

Perhaps it's time to start lining up CUSIP numbers on bonds issued by countrywide and public pension funds. You know, just to see who is being ring-fenced out

Tue, 08/30/2011 - 18:59 | 1616929 max2205
max2205's picture

Fuckers

Tue, 08/30/2011 - 20:21 | 1617143 unununium
unununium's picture

.

Tue, 08/30/2011 - 20:22 | 1617161 unununium
unununium's picture

Chromosomes are aligning inside BAC, and parties are lining up outside, positioning themselves for the unholy shit-supernova.

 

Wed, 08/31/2011 - 12:42 | 1619238 moonstears
moonstears's picture

Fellow ZHers, I'm a lowly, self described, armchair economics expert :]. Many of you are surely much bigger picture experts...actual econ experience and legends outside your own minds, unlike myself, so please answer the following: If BAC can borrow at .25 % at the discount window, why pay uncle Warren 6%??????  

Mon, 09/05/2011 - 09:28 | 1634007 shacai
shacai's picture

Welcome to http://www.replicabagsell.com .Our company was founded in 2004 and was committed to internet marketing businesses in 2006. Replica Handbags are always in a great demand and sells well. Recently, we launched some new and updated them on our website. Here you can find some scarce Cheap Christian Louboutin shoes, which were difficult to find from other websites. sac à main are also always in hotsale.

We have gotten many great comments from our customers and earn a good NFL jerseys reputation in foreign makerts, more than 90% customers are satisfied with our products and service, till now our online members NFL jerseys are beyond 80,000. As of right now, we currently serve customers from over Christian Louboutin 18 countries, and we are still growing. We really hope to expand our business through cooperation with individuals and companies from around the world.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!