This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

G-20 Demands German Gold To Keep Eurozone Intact; German Central Bank Tells G-20 Where To Stick It

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Going back to the annals of brokeback Europe, we learn that gold after all is money, after the G-20 demanded that EFSF (of €1 trillion "stability fund" yet can't raise €3 billion fame) be backstopped by none other than German gold. Per Reuters, "The Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung (FAS) reported that Bundesbank reserves -- including foreign currency and gold -- would be used to increase Germany's contribution to the crisis fund, the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) by more than 15 billion euros ($20 billion)." And who would be the recipient of said transfer? Why none other than the most insolvent of global hedge funds, the European Central Bank.

Also, in addition to gold, the ECB had set its eyes on that other "fake" currency that DSK had succeded in protecting throughout his tenure, all his other undoings aside, "The Welt am Sonntag newspaper, citing similar plans, said 15 billion euros would come from special drawing rights (SDR) that the Bundesbank holds." Naturally, these discoveries prompted a prompt and furious rebuttal from the very top of German authorities: "Germany's gold and foreign exchange reserves, which the Bundesbank administers, were not at any point up for discussion at the G20 summit in Cannes," government spokesman Steffen Seibert said. The WSJ adds, "A plan to have the International Monetary Fund issue its special currency as a powerful weapon in Europe's efforts to contain the widening euro-zone debt crisis was blocked by German Chancellor Angela Merkel, according to a report in a German newspaper."

There are three observations to be made here: i) when it comes to rescuing insolvent countries, Germany is delighted to sacrifice euros at the altar of the 50-some year old PIIGS retirement age; ask for its gold however, and things get ugly; ii) the Eurozone, the ECB and the EFSF are dead broke, insolvent and/or have zero credibility in the capital markets, and they know it and iii) due to the joint and several nature of the ECB's capital calls, while Germany may have had enough leverage to tell G-20 to shove it, the next countries in line, especially those which are already insolvent and will rely on the EFSF for their existence once the ECB's SMP program is finished, may not be that lucky, and in exchange for remaining in the eurozone, the forfeit could well be their gold.

WSJ brings details on how German SDRs would be used as a temporary (temporary as in European financial short selling ban, and temporary reduction of initial margin to maintenance for everyone to appease MF Global clients) backstop for Europe:

The idea of using SDRs to fight financial contagion isn't new. When the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008 unleashed a financial crisis, the G-20 in 2009 approved a $250 billion SDR allocation to help backstop efforts to fight the spread of the crisis.

 

The European Central Bank has been buying euro-zone bonds in an effort to keep borrowing costs of weakened members from exploding. But the ECB's efforts are considered by some experts to be outside of its central mandate to maintain price stability. And the ECB has said that its special measures - buying euro-zone debt -- should be temporary and limited in scope. That is another reason why some people are advocating the IMF play a greater role in propping up weakened euro-zone members and become the lender of last resort.

 

Speaking to reporters at the close of the Cannes summit, Merkel indicated that G-20 leaders agreed in principle that the IMF and EFSF could work together, but the summit could not agree on any specifics.

 

"We have an interesting process ahead of us and the discussion is not yet concluded," she said.

Reuters brings more on the the logical German reaction to the EFSF and ECB's extortion attempts:

"We know this plan and we reject it," a Bundesbank spokesman said.

 

Seibert said several partners had raised the question in Cannes whether SDRs could be used to strengthen the EFSF but Germany had rejected this plan and discussions at Monday's Eurogroup on Monday would not discuss this topic.

 

The newspapers had said the issue was taken off the agenda at the G20 following Bundesbank opposition but that it would be debated on Monday at a Eurogroup meeting of euro zone finance ministers.

Why will it be debated? Because when at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Germany may be crossed off the list, but here is who is next in order of appearance. Sooner or later, Europe will stumble on that one "leader" whose gold is less valuable than their political stability, because after all, a "united", "EMUed" Europe has the biggest MAD trump card of all.


 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Sat, 11/05/2011 - 23:53 | 1849839 natty light
natty light's picture

Why would they want an inedible relic?

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 00:04 | 1849857 Karl Tashjian
Karl Tashjian's picture

Cuz it's shiny.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 00:09 | 1849864 knukles
knukles's picture

That's why my wife likes it.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 00:20 | 1849888 TruthInSunshine
TruthInSunshine's picture

I do believe, and I'm not just saying this as hyperbole, that Germany is at the point where either the people just give in and accept what they know will be a fate of massive inflation (as the ECB inevitable must hyper print euros to pay off EU sovereign bonds and recapitalize EU private and quasi-private banks, not to even mention the derivative exposure that must be satisfied held by such institutions) and falling living standards, as they are sacrificed in order to kick the PIIGS+France+UK can down the street for a year to several years at most (so, two generations of Germans' financial lives will be sacrificed to bail out the EU for a few years), OR, the German People are about to rise up against Merkel and any politician that allies themself with Merkel or anyone endorsing that the EU remain intact.

I don't see any daylight in between those two possible outcomes, as the only way that the EU can be salvaged for a few more years is by sacrificing the savings and capital of those in Germany. How can the EU be salvaged for more than a year, at best, without such a sacrifice of Germans?

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 00:25 | 1849900 CrazyCooter
CrazyCooter's picture

Yup.

I think its the latter.

General revolt in the US as well.

WWIII is the only alternative that doesn't including hangings via lamp posts.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBGPw_LBiRA

Regards,

Cooter

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 06:48 | 1850162 Motley Fool
Motley Fool's picture

I think they will take door number three.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 07:10 | 1850173 Sean7k
Sean7k's picture

The NY FED already has it and they aren't giving it back.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 07:56 | 1850200 GetZeeGold
GetZeeGold's picture

 

 

Occupy Fort Knox.

 

Nothing else is going on there.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 08:38 | 1850234 cowdiddly
cowdiddly's picture

Protesters get close to Fort Knox and they will make the Oakland Police look like the Red Cross. Never will they allow anyone to see the cobwebs and tungsten bars.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 09:16 | 1850271 Big Slick
Big Slick's picture

Most of the US govt's gold is 800 feet under the Fed building in NYC.  (7,000 metric tons... Knox has 4,500 metric tons)

ONE BLOCK FROM ZUCCOTTI PARK!!!!  (Gulp)

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 09:23 | 1850276 strannick
strannick's picture

The Germans benefitted for a couple of decades by being able to cheaply export to the Piigs countries while they had a common cheap currency. If PIIGS had to use their own cheap currencies, they could never have afforded Germany's exports, and Germany wouldnt have had its great boom.

Germany accepted this inequality when it was in their favor, now their bitching when the shithawks come home to roost. The main thing from this is that no one want to give up their gold.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 09:50 | 1850304 jm
jm's picture

I would only add that if it is the position of Germany to not provide collateral to make periphery debt serviceable, then they shouldn't pressure these countries with whatever threats to not default.

 

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 12:28 | 1850510 gmrpeabody
gmrpeabody's picture

All our gold are belong to you..... 9!

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 12:25 | 1850470 CTG_Sweden
CTG_Sweden's picture

 

 

Strannick:

 

The Germans benefitted for a couple of decades by being able to cheaply export to the Piigs countries while they had a common cheap currency. If PIIGS had to use their own cheap currencies, they could never have afforded Germany's exports, and Germany wouldnt have had its great boom.

 

Germany accepted this inequality when it was in their favor, now their bitching when the shithawks come home to roost. The main thing from this is that no one want to give up their gold.

 

 

 

 

 

It would have been no problem for Germany to print money and thereby depreciate the D-mark. The money printed by the Bundesbank could have been lent to high-tech companies, students and so on at low interest rates and thereby reducing costs for households and companies. This would have been even better for the German economy.

 

I think that politicians in Europe now are too much concentrated on punishing Germany for its anti-Semitism in the past and toppling Berlusconi since his power in the past, and perhaps also in the future, partially has depended on nationalists in northern Italy and ex-fascists.

 

The most simple solution to the debt problems in Europe would be to transform the monetary union into a union with less political ambitions and more focus on solving practical problems.

 

My assessment is that the least painful solution to the debt problem is to print money and lend that money at very low interest rates to Italy and Spain. Especially if the EU would require that all oil must be paid in euros rather than other currencies. That would be the same policy as the United States currently is practising.

 

If they don´t impose a euro requirement for oil imports I guess that the result will be inflation. That will harm Italian small savers. On the other hand they have so far benefited from lower taxes and more government spending than the country actually can afford. But the political price for Berlusconi and his buddies would be far smaller if the Italians would pay for the government debt by inflation rather than by higher taxes and less government spending. And those who do not like Berlusconi´s allies prefer a solution which means a high political price for Berlusconi.

 

Another problem is that Germany does not like inflation and that their export companies do not need a depreciated currency like other countries do. Solutions that mean more inflation and that Germany´s tax payers may lose hundreds of billions of dollars are unattractive solutions to Germany. I suppose that is why the EU so far has chosen such solutions.

 

I realize that it would be bad for the US economy if the EU would require that all imported oil should be paid in euros. This would reduce the amount of USD that the world economy can absorb. Therefore, the US would have to print less or face more inflation.

 

However, if the eurozone would be shrunk to the countries which are most enthusiastic about the euro or need cheap, printed money to pay for their government debts, respectively, the amount of needed printed euros would be limited. Why not let Italy, Spain, France, Belgium and a few other countries continue with the euro and let other countries, Germany for instance, have their own currencies? Other EU countries could contribute indirectly to the prosperity of the eurozone by a commitment to only buy oil for euros during a transitional period.

 

Furthermore, I think the US should be more willing to accept a smaller eurozone that prints money in the same manner us the US.

 

I think that an important problem in Europe and North America is that politics is not decided by pragmatic people to a sufficient extent. There are too much fanatics. These people probably feel that lobbyists and the big media will treat them more favourably if they act like fanatics. It is not just the debt problem in Europe which is an example of that. Take the proposed attacks on Iran, for instance. They actually think that it is legitimate to nuke Iran because they are perhaps are designing some nuclear devices on the drawing board. Even though I think that it is perhaps more likely that they will attack Pakistan rather than Iran since they already have nukes and since Pakistan would be caught by surprise and since it is less unlikely that domestic, capricious radicals will be able to seize nukes in Pakistan, I still think that openly talking about creating a nuclear disaster in an oil producing country indicates that many European and American politicians do not prioritize economic stability and prosperity sufficiently but rather other, political strategic objectives. They are actually willing to sacrifice the economy for other political objectives. This is a typical hallmark of fanatics. There are European politicians like the late British minister of foreign affairs Gordon Cook and the American politician Ron Paul who either are more pragmatic or prioritize other objectives. As regards Ron Paul, he seems to be driven by a wish to return to the original principles of the American society which to me seems to have been as much freedom as possible for individual citizens and that the individual should be affected by government decisions to the smallest extent possible. Ron Paul can probably not be characterized as "pragmatic". But he does not prioritize the same objectives as most other leading American and European politicians. However, I think that his idea that the Fed should stop printing money is unrealistic, especially if he thinks that should happen instantly. I think that the US must raise import duties, impose tax breaks on domestically produced energy, reduce the oversupply to the labour market, raise taxes and cut government spending before the US can stop printing.

 

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 13:39 | 1850676 DoChenRollingBearing
DoChenRollingBearing's picture

+ 1, very good, but I could not get your green arrow to work.  Nice analysis.

Mon, 11/07/2011 - 00:49 | 1852046 Bringin It
Bringin It's picture

DCRB - word is that posts that begin with italics, can not be 'arrowed' up or down.  Breaks the javascript maybe?

Edit - appearently, sometimes breaks the 'arrow' mechanism, as the up arrow just worked on this comment.

Another edit - Another example of the leading-italics-malfunction-syndrome.  http://www.zerohedge.com/news/g-20-demands-german-gold-keep-eurozone-int...

 

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 14:07 | 1850738 schadenfreude
schadenfreude's picture

Couldn't agree more.

+1 Green from me

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 15:04 | 1850872 11b40
11b40's picture

Thank you for your thoughtful and interesting commentary.  Euros for oil, indeed.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 09:28 | 1850279 Oh regional Indian
Oh regional Indian's picture

Hey Big Slick, did you know that a part of the area under the NY Fed is foreign territory? It's in the minutes of an FOMC not so long ago(while Greenspan was in-charge).

My bet is German Gold is safe in the fourth Reich's hands. Wherever it is.

And all these CB numbers are the tip of the iceberg.

ORI

and-the-circus-rolls-on-and-on/

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 09:48 | 1850301 FranSix
FranSix's picture

Mario Draghi, the new European Central Bank governor, is a Goldman Sachs alumnus. Also a former head of the Bank Of Italy.  His focus and concentration is privatisations.

 

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 11:16 | 1850389 disabledvet
disabledvet's picture

you mean "privations."

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 22:50 | 1851868 TruthInSunshine
TruthInSunshine's picture

 

 

You both mean:

"Provisions"

As in, provisions of real, valuable assets, culled from the aftermath of the destruction from the very explosives they've rigged the global economy with.

As it was with AIG, the Abacus/Timberwold/Hudson, and many other fiascos (or should I say fiatscos), The Vampire Squid is hoping to profit from being a false prophet yet again.

Mon, 11/07/2011 - 00:11 | 1852012 Big Slick
Big Slick's picture

Interesting.  Did not know that.  Most of what I know about the NY Fed building I learned from Die Hard 3.

"Yippee kiyay m---f---r."

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 10:33 | 1850342 Eally Ucked
Eally Ucked's picture

How you got those numbers? As far as I know there is only a bit over 8000 metric tons in possesion of US gov.

Maybe that source is not correct but .....

http://www.fms.treas.gov/gold/current.html

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 11:02 | 1850373 cosmictrainwreck
cosmictrainwreck's picture

thanks for that........ROFLMAO with the three-decimal-place troy oz! they count all the goldust, too, huh? Am so grateful for my diligent gubbmint accountants.... so why won't they let anybody verify anything? "we" should at least know what % haircut "we" take on "our" real vs. bullshit imaginary "ownership"

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 13:45 | 1850683 DoChenRollingBearing
DoChenRollingBearing's picture

Eally, cosmic,

+ 1 for each of you.  Indeed, why not let some journalists and maybe an auditor and respected PM specialists go along with the .gov accountants?

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 22:16 | 1851815 CrazyCooter
CrazyCooter's picture

Most of the US govt's gold is 800 feet under the Fed building in NYC.  (7,000 metric tons... Knox has 4,500 metric tons)

ONE BLOCK FROM ZUCCOTTI PARK!!!!  (Gulp)

 

<sigh/>

US Gold is at Ft. Knox (built explicitly for the purpose of holding gold) and West Point.

If you have information, with any credibility, other than your spittle-on-the-chin, please share with the community.

Regards,

Cooter

 

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 22:18 | 1851821 CrazyCooter
CrazyCooter's picture

Sorry, quick correction. The US Government gold is 8k tons and is at West Point and Ft. Knox.

Perhaps you refer to private gold held by US banks, which has ownership both domestic and international. In fact, many foreign nations house their gold in New York. Total "private gold held by US banks" is 4k tons if I understand correctly.

Suckers.

Regards,

Cooter

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 10:33 | 1850341 Everyman
Everyman's picture

@cowdiddly:

You mean the Fort Knox security would shoot all those people to prevent them from finding out it is just an empty building???

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 11:07 | 1850378 cosmictrainwreck
cosmictrainwreck's picture

probly just rubber bullets, not live ammo... then the tear-gas & etc etc; round 'em up haul 'em off... no problem. It's a "national suckurity" issue, ya know?

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 11:59 | 1850458 trav7777
trav7777's picture

The FRBNY probably has already LENT OUT Germany's gold...this is going to be the dirty secret of all secrets

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 13:47 | 1850690 DoChenRollingBearing
DoChenRollingBearing's picture

Then the FRBNY would have to call its gold back.  THAT would be an interesting thing to watch.  Gold would leap...

 

fofoa.blogspot.com

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 22:21 | 1851827 CrazyCooter
CrazyCooter's picture

Physical gold rarely leaves the vault during leasing.

What happens is a trading of paper claims (on paper claims (on paper claims (on paper claims))). So, when the system blows up, the gold is still right where it started and all the paper is still just paper.

Not saying physical depositors can't lose, just saying it is generally how it works with physical deposits (if you are a big boy like the US Government).

Regards,

Cooter

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 10:28 | 1850335 daxtonbrown
daxtonbrown's picture

[General revolt in the US as well.]

It is obvious we are already in a simmering civil war, the Tea Partiers and OWSers are just choosing up sides, along with the union goons. It is a civil war over debt bondabe (i.e. slavery) of your children and grandchildren as far as the mind can see. This cannot stand, the sovereigns must default as we all know. We are just now beginning to realize that if the revolt doesn't succeed we all end up morelocks down in the mines.

http://www.futurnamics.com/civilwar.php

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 11:27 | 1850398 matrix2012
matrix2012's picture

@CrazyCooter,

did you mean the USSA will bomb IRAN  as a way out of this crisis? Another dirty trick to divert the people's attention from the immense ongoing difficulties??

Your conjecture seems to pose some legitimacy cuz the Israel has been crying out very loudly about the option to attack Iran.

Here's whatever the official bark for the mass consumption :)

http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/u-s-officials-israel-refused-to-commit-to-withhold-surprise-attack-on-iran-1.393914

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 11:47 | 1850439 RiverRoad
RiverRoad's picture

Hmmm, now if Iran is nuked, just which way will the fallout blow?  Should be interesting.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 14:32 | 1850755 matrix2012
matrix2012's picture

Die Welt runs a hawkish article about the possibility of an Israeli attack on Iran:

http://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/article13701473/Israel-kann-Irans-Bom...

 

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 20:36 | 1851629 AustriAnnie
AustriAnnie's picture

And, while everyone is talking about Iran, we're sending troops to Uganda.  And looking at Somalia and Nigeria.  Oil, people, oil!  Africa is where the empire sees resources to grab.

They have many options to play their war games, it doesn't have to be Iran.  

Hell if I know what they'll do.  But the MSM is playing up this Somalia/Nigeria "terrorist" group that is so conveniently connected to the groups we're already at war with.  

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 21:51 | 1851785 CrazyCooter
CrazyCooter's picture

It was tongue-in-cheek.

The US will not "nuke" Iran, however I do very much expect "the west" to "replace" the government which happens to exist over the territorial area of "Iran".

Doing so will take MENA oil off line as all hell breaks lose. The powers that be in various countries will have the "excuse" they need to take "martial law" type powers and the current domestic rebellions will therefore "take a back seat".

Once WWIII gets going real good, its about starving half the world (i.e. the half that can't grow their own food with their own energy - or defend said production from hungry neighbors).

Plenty of resources to feed the beast after that happens! Just think of how many debt instruments are suddenly worth ... nothing!

I am still not sure if gold gets a front seat if this plays out as such.

Regards,

Cooter

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 13:22 | 1850643 Ganja Jane
Ganja Jane's picture

LOL!

The awakened ones have seen it coming. The propaganda machines are in full swing.

Aren't sanctions part of war?

http://news.yahoo.com/khamenei-accuses-u-terror-attacks-iran-115214653.html

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 14:30 | 1850770 matrix2012
matrix2012's picture

we are all living in a very sickening world... a very pathetic one full of twisting  >:)


“When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves, in the course of time, a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.” — Frédéric Bastiat (1801-1850)

 

 

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 13:58 | 1850712 earleflorida
earleflorida's picture

such a cowardly act!

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 00:46 | 1849933 lolmao500
lolmao500's picture

Except the ECB cannot print. Not now anyways. They would have to change the treaties.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 03:18 | 1850068 Libertarian777
Libertarian777's picture

because they always follow the treaties???

like especially the 'no bailout' clause... as well as the 'deficit not to exceed 3 (?) % GDP' etc. etc.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 08:11 | 1850209 Marco
Marco's picture

Well they obviously can, they have been shoring up bond prices after all. Despite common wisdom here though, it's quite clear that the ECB leadership is very reluctant to keep going on the printing/inflation route.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 08:35 | 1850231 goldfreak
goldfreak's picture

With Mario in charge? print away

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 09:12 | 1850264 masterinchancery
masterinchancery's picture

So far, you mean. The Schumer has not yet hit the fan.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 09:42 | 1850293 midtowng
midtowng's picture

I wonder if anyone else noticed from that chart that Italy is one of the major holders of gold in the world? They are also in trouble.

I could see Italy being forced to sell lots of gold on the market. It's what the far east did in 1997 right before their currencies collapsed. It also crushed the price of gold for several years.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 10:38 | 1850347 jesse livermoore
jesse livermoore's picture

they could push there entire pile onto the market, the chinese Gov. would would be happy to  trade in there 2 trillion dollars.   there will be no price collapse

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 11:46 | 1850434 matrix2012
matrix2012's picture

 

According to wiki/Gold_reserve, Italy at #3 position has as many as 2,451.8 tonnes (World official gold holding, December 2010).

At a price of US$1900/oz., reached in September 2011, one ton of gold has a value of approximately US$60.8 million.

So roughly Italy's gold reserve has value of app. 2452 X US$ 61 millions = USD 150 billions...

Is it enough for Italy to sell off all of its gold reserve to tackle its current financial problem? Will it be any help then? :)

 

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 12:25 | 1850502 Chaffinch
Chaffinch's picture

I don't think $150 billion would solve Italy's problems; if they sell their physical, and remain tied to the rest of the Eurozone, and their banks remain exposed to crappy credit everywhere, they are still going to be in deep doo-doo...

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 14:45 | 1850824 matrix2012
matrix2012's picture

but if Italy can LEVERAGE that US$150 billions into 5 or 6 times or even more, follows the Wall Street TOP banskters, it may be able to solve its messes. The very problem is to find such cash-rich fool willing to accept such scheme. Perhaps Italy should knock loudly the door of the House of Saud... =F

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 01:14 | 1849971 Caviar Emptor
Caviar Emptor's picture

There are issues in Germany such as the demographic

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 01:08 | 1850019 oldman
oldman's picture

Truth,

Maybe they'll take 'the american plan' rate and just keep working on the problem problem until it becomes like the weather as a topic of conversation.

After all the EU is the largest economy in the world and only requires free passage of goods, services, people, and a common currency to maintain its position. A supranational government was never necessary except for the pols and technicians(bureaucrats); the autonomy of sovereign states was never seriously threatened except for the obviously flawed and failed attempt voted down several times thus far.

With the effort made so far toward resolution of Greece, this oldman would not shy away from the euro were the European Union shorn of those states to weak to abide by the rules; and the common currency has been a major reason for the Union's success.

Everyone in Europe seems to understand this and, IMO, it is only a matter of time until the current farce is ended and the non-compliers skillfully placed outside the Union until they comply. It is really much simpler than anyone admits, but has to be accomplished with great diplomacy in order to maintain respect for every state and its national sovereignity.

I am no expert in any of this and also damned near ignorant of many of the details, but I am certain of one thing; there is a desire to work out these problems with respect towards each member so as not to shut the door to the future.

In many ways, I admire this attitude though, as an american, it is completely foreign to me. I wish we had all the money back that we had spent 'John Wayne-ing' with wars and threats of wars, with violence rather than with grace as the super-power we were, but-----------

We are the american union----we are different, but we are survivors enough to adapt to the new paradigm that is. Are any of the american union's states in as much difficulty as Greece, Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Spain, Great Britain-------California, Illinois, New Jersey, who else in our union has a problem? Yeah, two questions at once but I'm getting tired----please excuse me.

So the daylight you say you cannot see may be there after all----the Europeans are not stupid and bthey are fighting their governments each day-----in the streets against great violence from the other side. This has not been shown so much, even in Europe----but the street does have a plan and knows what it wants, and is fighting for it, and these are very nice human beings.

I wouldn't bet a buck on how this will resolve itself or how many generations it will take, but there are infinite ways not just the few that msm throws at us

This is going to be a long war, Truth----------------om

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 05:57 | 1850126 reload
reload's picture

Thanks OM this is thought provoking stuff. However the Euro Banks are in FAR worse shape than their US counterparts - so muddling along until a diplomatic exclusion from the Euro of `non compliers` can be brokered is exceedingly problematic. The situation reminds me of a couple I once came accross who had got married under the impression that their spouse was very rich. As it turned out they were both broke and the Marriage was revealed for all as sham. They truly deserved each other!

In this case the poorer Euro states saw the Euro as a meal ticket - easy credit and good standing on the back of Germany. That honeymoon is now over. The Germans saw the Euro as a way to a more competitive currency than the rock hard DM, but their partners in the project had to start behaving like them, i.e working harder, seeking productivity gains and learning fiscal responsibility. The Germans wanted to believe that with a stable currency their new partners would achieve this. That dream is also in tatters.

So the Euro marriage is far from happy. Nobody is any longer getting from it what they wanted. Germans must be waking up by now to the fact that if they dont seek a divorce soon there will be no marital assets left at all.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 08:22 | 1850216 Marco
Marco's picture

The banks are in bad shape, but letting banks and sovereigns go bankrupt is not the fucking end of the world or the Euro. Guaranteeing consumer accounts up to say 100k (and similar amounts of money for pensions) if we let the PIGS go bankrupt will cost quite a lot of money, but it's not going to bankrupt the northern European countries.

What is bankrupting us is not letting the PIGS go bankrupt and bailing out the financiers rather than just the retail and pension savers.

Hell for solidarity and stability maybe we should even bail out retail savers and pensions for the PIGS (up to a point, as the Slovaks said ... it doesn't make sense for poor countries to bail out pensions in Greece a couple times higher than theirs). That would still be cheaper than what we are doing now ...

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 09:14 | 1850267 masterinchancery
masterinchancery's picture

With what are you doing this "bailing"?

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 12:29 | 1850492 Marco
Marco's picture

Sovereign debt, the economies in trade balance or trade surplus have no trouble at auction for their own debt. The EFSF has trouble because it's throwing money down financier's gullets to feed financiers ... which they of course know isn't going to work, since their gullets are bottomless. They're quite happy to offload trash on the ECB and a purely tax backed EFSF, but putting their own capital in would be silly.

The moment we stop "bailing out" the financiers (actually enriching them in collateral terms) we can get back to the fundamental issue of debt sustainability and that depends on only one thing, trade balance.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 17:59 | 1851243 DCFusor
DCFusor's picture

Fuking + 5 billion, Marco -  The banks are pulling that scene from Blazing Saddles -- do what I want or the nigger gets it....Call their freaking bluff.  We can figure out ways around needing them as they are (and should have long since).  As if some non productive gambling paper-pushers were actually required to make the world go around.  I don't buy it, never did, and neither should anyone else.  Believe it or not, it's possible to live an entire life without bank credit - my total life borrowing at age 58 was $2k to buy a drum set when I was 20.  When I paid that off - no more credit for anything everl.  My neighbors and friends used to ask "how can you live like that?".  I am now wealthier than all of them combined, and can now return the question with interest - and the answer is, they can't - losing homes, losing all that stuff they couldn't afford but felt entitled to - so be it - they lorded it over me when they had it and I didn't - but they didn't own it, they borrowed it and now can't keep paying.  As far as I'm concerned, that crowd, and the banker-enablers can eat shit and die, the world will then be a better place - for all but them.

 

Why do we allow these people to war on us and win?  That's what it is -- war is about subjugating the enemy, and we've allowed ourselves to be subjugated by these losers.

Time to take our lives back -- what happens to theirs is their concern, just like they said that about us when they were screwing us.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 11:22 | 1850394 disabledvet
disabledvet's picture

"Healthy polities but completely bankrupt banks." I agree. And instead of fixing the banks they've obliterated them...while at the same time spending more. And then scoffed at the American solution of "saving the banks while spending less on government." I'm at a loss here. Why do we care again? Now that we know Turkey is the Industrial Powerhouse for all of Europe why don't we simply allow all of Europe to throw itself off the (famous of course) bridge and we'll be friends with "Turkey and those that are friends with Turkey." Which would include Europe of course--or some close facsimile thereof--"and the other nice people."

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 15:01 | 1850481 matrix2012
matrix2012's picture

STILL the new powerhouse Turkey in NO way can join the EU because the naively pathetic TURKS are forgetful that they're mostly MOSLEM (regardless how secular they may call themselves), their entrance into EU will just tarnish the prevailing Christian cultures there O:-)

but of course this matter can't be spoken out gracefully >:X  pity on Turks

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 12:04 | 1850464 matrix2012
matrix2012's picture

Well said reload! And you said it in excellent clarity! Nice to have a SIMPLE  human language with clear thoughts here, which is getting harder to find in ZH :D seems folks here do not fond of simplicity... instead many prefer to cryptic thoughts

anyhow your statement seems to construe a mutual benefit, once upon time... yet now it's over, just woke up in tough realities. 

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 13:53 | 1850703 buyingsterling
buyingsterling's picture

The discussion has already become normalized: many here have lost sight of the fact that the EU is a monstrosity, a blight on the European people. It's a vehicle to enhance the power and wealth of the .01%, and a tool for them to use to fashion a world government. Many of these statists probably think they are trying to help mankind advance, but what they offer is regression, and an end to real individualism and sovereignty - both human and geographic. They've abused their citizens in erecting the whole thing, making a mockery of democracy. We should hope the whole thing crashes and burns, the sooner the better.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 17:44 | 1851041 oldman
oldman's picture

From your handle, buyingsterling,

May I presume that there is an additional benefit for you upon the crashing and burning of the European Union and the euro?

Normalization of the discussion is to speak the language of msm and the pandering to the masses more propaganda that it is perceived the 'masses' want to hear, read, or see in order to maintain the advertising revenues of the mouthpieces of the 1%.

We do not have a normalized view at all; quite the opposite, in fact, a view that is self-derived and independent of much of the conditioning that is the norm. We are not special, merely different, and this oldman is pleased to note that our line of reasoning---even if uninformed and naiive---seems to be more agreeable to others as time passes.

Please, we are in this together and it is not an easy thing to spend 60 years of ones life going against the grain to the extent that 'love it or leave it' is heard so often. The deal is all screwed up and so many people are held in bondage by 'newspeak' that it is difficult to find such a forum as ZH, let alone express a point of view that is intolerable to TPTB.

Anyway, real individualization is an egocentric myth that is difficult to convince americans of and out of respect for you individuality and life force, I welcome further comments from you and others that differ from my own thoughts.

We are on the same side-----------om

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 17:04 | 1851118 oldman
oldman's picture

Reload, thanks for your comment,

One thing that has always struck me as odd is why these poorer nations were ever romanced into the European Union in the first place.

My 'theory' is that upon the dissolution of the Soviet bloc, the NATO nations did not want to lose control of the fortuitous shift and thus the Euro-expansion was given great impetus and importance. This was incidental to the message written on the wall that the system was very limited and would eventually crash, as it has done. The European nations, in alliance with the 'richest and most powerful nation on the face of the earth', played their hands well and permanently buried the 'commies' as they had been trying to do for 80 years. Prosperity broke out everywhere and the 'force' was with it, so long as the old model was strengthened.

Who would have predicted in those days that in such a short time the US would have to go to the markets for funding of its huge deficit spending and sop up all the available sources of funds, leaving a vacuum for all other nations as far as external borrowing was concerned. Now, the system is in complete chaos and no one can get it back the way it was or the way we want it; these are uncomfortable times. Something is happening beyond our perception, I believe; a new way of being and new economic model is constructing itself out of a basic survival instinct that our species requires in times such as now. Or maybe, I am just hooked on hopium beyond help----only time will tell.

Alas, this is 'think-tank' stuff and I am completely unqualified to write about it. These are just randoms thoughts that have come to me as a casual observer over the last twenty years when I lived in the forest and saw the news no more than a few days every month. My thoughts, I place openly here, as an ill-informed oldman, looking for answers to questions that are beyond my intellectual capacity.

Thank you and everyone else at ZH for being so kind and respectful                      om

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 20:47 | 1851650 AustriAnnie
AustriAnnie's picture

"this is 'think-tank' stuff and I am completely unqualified to write about it"

You are quite qualified, sounds to me.  Sadly the people who are most qualified ARE the average, normal, individual person who sits back and observes it all, and yet the world looks to politicians, expert economists (Krugman? i mean, srsly?), and academics as the source of information.  

I have learned more about economics and society and the world from the man on the street than I could ever get from a think tank or a phD from Harvard.

Keep commenting, nobody at ZH is going to ignore you because you don't have "comma, PhD" after your name (and if they do, they're trolls anyway, so have at em).  

You are the type who puts things back together when the "experts" are done destroying it all.  World needs more oldmen who can see the bigger picture.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 12:01 | 1850462 trav7777
trav7777's picture

We used to have a common language and a common culture.  Immigrants came here and did not demand that everything be in their language or that the country should morph into a place like where they came from.

This was before the dark times..before diversity

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 03:53 | 1850083 philipat
philipat's picture

Agreed. And leadership is not defined as acting against the wishes and best interests of the people. Why should the hard-working Europeans be made to bailout the profliagte Greeks, Italians etc. They got themselves into this situation by totally ignoring the terms of EU membership, so let them get themselves out of it. Of course, the real issue is NOT the soverirgns but, and haven't we heard this somewhere before, the Banks. But again, why should we bail out the Banks for reasons other than that they own the politicians? Let the Bnaks fail together with their shareholders, bondholders, BoD's and managements. Then we can move on.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 08:30 | 1850228 Marco
Marco's picture

The problem with a true bank failure without government backstop is that if it happens in one Eurozone country you instantly get bankruns in all the Eurozone trade deficit countries and once the EU economy tanks it would spread to the others as well ... now I'm in favour of letting banks go bankrupt when necessary, but I think instantly bankrupting all banks is a little too much.

Maybe we should go to full reserve banking to make this kind of stuff irrelevant, but for the moment faith in the system needs to be preserved. I think the European stability fund should be like a FDIC for the Euro zone, that has some value.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 11:32 | 1850407 disabledvet
disabledvet's picture

absolutely. and as the article notes "gold and other reserves." well...in Germany those "other reserves" amount to hundred of billions of "worthless fiat denominated debt"--all of which is put at risk through "PIGG(i)E Bank" annihilation. How such intelligent "economists" can be so stupid is simply beyond me--although the term "lack of political will" has been coming up over and over. Or perhaps more accurately "the right type of political will." The problem of course is that at this point New York is figuring out the collapse of the Euro-zone has advantages as well. A massive amount of global capital has already left the Euro-zone and rather than discuss ways to grow their respective economies they're only discussing how to hold on to what they've got. Yet they themselves have been outsourcing their mfging beyond belief. What if New York simply became the bankers to those to whom they have outsourced?

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 09:09 | 1850261 Big Slick
Big Slick's picture

Nice summary, Sunshine.  That is the situation.

"Germany is at the point where either the people just give in and accept what they know will be a fate of massive inflation ... as they are sacrificed in order to kick the PIIGS+France+UK can down the street for a year to several years at most ...., OR, the German People are about to rise up against Merkel and any politician that allies themself with Merkel or anyone endorsing that the EU remain intact."

Kyle Bass agrees (see his CNBC remarks from early Oct on YouTube).  He calls your option #1: "All-in"

Says the Germans will NOT go All-in.  Paraphrase: "If you had relatives that were completely fiscally irresponsible, would you align with them and bail them out on your family's dime?"

 

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 09:43 | 1850294 Maxisaxon
Maxisaxon's picture

The German newspaper Die Welt reports reports in its Sunday addition that a new poll shows that 71% of Germans want a national referendum on the Euro and, that 63% of trhe German people do not believe that Greece can stay in the Euro Zone. Folks, there is political trouble brewing in Germany. I am going to call my cousin's family in Germany this morning to get some anecdotal evidence  in terms of their feelings on these issues.

  

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 11:03 | 1850372 pain_and_soros
pain_and_soros's picture

The leadership of the PIGS obviously don't want to accept the austerity required to appease their creditors (i.e., northern neighbours), while the creditors, by withholding bailout cash are threatening the PIGS's access to future funding if they don't straighten out their own financial mess (while the ECB presumably plays middleman, buying up maturing PIGS debt so the "negotiations" can continue so long as "progress" is being made).

The resolution to all this seems clear - it obviously won't be painless politically or financially, but simpler than what is being portrayed.

Creditors recognize the inability of the PIGS to repay all of their debt & take the hit via "voluntary restructuring" thereby not triggering a credit event & CDS payout.  if that means the banks have to be recapitalized/nationalized, so be it - with each country looking after its own banks. 

Going forward, the funding for recapitalization of the banks and countries' future access to credit can be done via gold-backed bonds - that will enforce the necessary financial discipline on the PIGS (& everyone else) or they forfeit their gold.

If a country doesn't want to run out of gold - then they better produce something of value to trade with others and not perpetually & indefinitely consume more than they produce...

Pretty simple actually...

Oh and for the CDS holders...well, if your naked (e.g., you aren't party to an underlying bond that the CDS is hedging) then you are on your own - we aren't bailing out your counterparty.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 14:06 | 1850736 DoChenRollingBearing
DoChenRollingBearing's picture

Your plan seems very good.  Responsible.  I don't think we want to go down the rathole of triggering CDS payouts.  Each country creditor country takes its medicine by recapitalizing its own banks.

And in the future gold-backed bonds.  Pay the debts or lose the gold.

Too simple and too elegant for the politicians to accept though.

+ 1

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 18:09 | 1851273 DCFusor
DCFusor's picture

Oh, I think NOT triggering at least some CDS payouts is both immoral and irresponsible.  You are saying that those who bought them should be screwed?  Why should not those who unwisely sold them, with out the stuff to back them up not catch a little of that screwing?  They are the ones who caused this horrible mess - without them, the leverage wouldn't have been possible that is at the root - things would have had to adjust long before it got this bad.

Of course, it's really government's (the servants of the bankers) fault for allowing insurance to be sold without the resources to back it - in normal insurance that is already illegal, and lo and behold, the failure of insurance companies is rare -- funny thing about that.

We need to let the irresponsible fail, and those who build their world by skimming off the rest of us should not get off without penalty - we've paid, it's their turn.  And we're going to be paying for a few generations - your kids too - for socializing failure, but privatizing risk.  Time to turn the tables on those who have caused this evil.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 12:07 | 1850466 kaiserhoff
kaiserhoff's picture

wunderbar

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 12:12 | 1850473 trav7777
trav7777's picture

the major problem is that the PC movement has demonized ANYone who was a nationalist into marginalization as a neo nazi.  If you don't welcome 3rd world invasion and self-flagellate over sins by people who superficially resemble you, and in perpetuity, then you are a neonazi.  It's pretty much that simple all over the western world.

Things are going to end up polarized like prison gangs.

TLC or some other channel is now doing a whitewash "Muslim in America," where there's one woman who is pissed that someone says she's uncomfortable on a plane with her, "get your ass off a plane, I am going to educate people like you."  I wonder why that snotty muslim bitch isn't doing the educating in SAUDI ARABIA where she really should?  Instead she's "educating" white people on how racist they are because they look at muslim countries and see something that is revolting.  It will be more of texas sharpshooter muslims who are "just like you, see?"  And those few people should make you ignore that they are pouring acid in women's faces for "honor" or hanging 16 year old girls for taking off their hijabs.

There's an entire industry set up to condition civilized people to reject what their lyin' eyes are telling them and accept a total lie.  God forbid you might ever avail yourself of your brain and use a valid stereotype; there might be one bear in the woods who is really friendly and you'd hate to discriminate against him, right?  That would be the ultimate sin.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 14:14 | 1850718 matrix2012
matrix2012's picture

link here:

 

German call for a referendum on the euro

http://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article13701056/Deutsche-fordern-...

According to a poll commissioned by "Bild am Sonntag" 71 percent of Germans want to be able to vote directly on important decisions to Europe and the Euro. Only 27 percent oppose it.

63 percent believe that Greece won't be able to stay within the Eurozone. Only 32 percent believe that Athens can still be saved.

 

unfortunately, google translate did not do its job good enough, the translated page is just ugly!  -.-

 

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 22:16 | 1851817 eureka
eureka's picture

Here's EU's alternative: do like the US, PRINT.

EU hasn't stimulated, eased or printed like the US. US is far ahead in print & debt.

USD is backed by nothing at all - except military "muscle, a proven paper tiger.

Why then, should the EUR be backed by anything?

Oh, btw. EUR is backed by far higher productivity, infrastructure, energy efficiency and social structures than US.

US falls apart. EU prevails.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 01:40 | 1849989 Uber Vandal
Uber Vandal's picture

Didn't the Bernank say it was long term tradition and not money?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Dj9v9s9buk

Why yes he did.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 07:26 | 1850184 sunnydays
sunnydays's picture

Hyperinflation coming, they have done the money - fiat currency grab already with all the bailouts.  Now is the end game grab of the gold which is what they really want from the countries. 

 

Just look at Libya - it was about the gold and Gaddafhi wanting a gold backed currency.  Where is Libya's gold now?  I haven't heard a single word about what happened to it.

 

 

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 09:04 | 1850258 BurningFuld
BurningFuld's picture

Libya's Gold will be held to pay for all those bombing runs by NATO. Oh and to cover Gaddahi's stock and investment loses "cough cough"

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 13:25 | 1850653 JesusUp
JesusUp's picture

trusting rothschild is a majorly bad idea

ahem

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 13:52 | 1850700 Ganja Jane
Ganja Jane's picture

2 years old but relevant:

http://youtu.be/7Fw1RMKWypo

 

@ ~6:00

"...hold on to your gold bars..."
Yeah, I know...fucking BARS?!

He is public enemy number one.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 12:37 | 1850538 Chaffinch
Chaffinch's picture

Gadaffi ate all the gold.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 13:39 | 1850675 Ganja Jane
Ganja Jane's picture

A Chavez moment. The U.S. needs a HUGE Chavez movement to audit our gold in fort knox...if it's even there still.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 13:35 | 1850669 Ganja Jane
Ganja Jane's picture

That was an epic Ron Paul moment! I especially liked when he asked,"Is gold money?"

I betcha the bernanke had all his focus on NOT shitting his pants!

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 11:14 | 1850363 smlbizman
smlbizman's picture

yahoo reporting g-pap resigning today.......

 

and at 11.15 zhdge timed comments.....the story is pulled..

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 00:17 | 1849882 Snidley Whipsnae
Snidley Whipsnae's picture

"Why would they want an inedible relic?"

....................................

"In extremis only gold will be accepted as payment for goods and services"

Are we in extremis yet?

http://www.321gold.com/fed/greenspan/1966.html

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 01:19 | 1849975 Josh Randall
Josh Randall's picture

We've come for your tradition...and your women (in that order)

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 13:27 | 1850659 JesusUp
JesusUp's picture

keepa you hands offa my traditions

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 01:40 | 1849994 Placerville
Sun, 11/06/2011 - 07:39 | 1850191 shortus cynicus
shortus cynicus's picture

I don't disagree, but young virgins are also good money with real intrinsic value.

Good point about young virgins is that value of this money is depreciating witch forces savers to put it constantly into circulation, which is good for economy.

 

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 11:16 | 1850388 Bam_Man
Bam_Man's picture

Young virgins are not a particularly good store of value, since viriginity is as the Bernank himself would say, "transitory".

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 12:01 | 1850461 Shirley Wilfahrt
Shirley Wilfahrt's picture

The only "virgins" that will be involved will be the virgin asses of banksters. 

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 13:41 | 1850680 Ganja Jane
Ganja Jane's picture

I call bullshit on the asses of bankers being 'virgin.' Most of them are Bohemian Grove attendees.

Sorry for the mental images.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 00:25 | 1849899 Innocent Bystander
Innocent Bystander's picture

OT
Iran has nuclear explosive testing facility IAEA has satellite images of weapons site near

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 00:30 | 1849908 CrazyCooter
CrazyCooter's picture

Oh, I see you missed my caustic comment up thread ... let me share with you ... again ... the punch line ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBGPw_LBiRA

Regards,

Cooter

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 01:14 | 1850018 Michael
Michael's picture

Israel already has at least 300 nukes. Check out the Dimona facility in Israel. Maybe Iran can make a dirty bomb of it.

"The Dimona heavy water reactor and an installation for processing irradiated fuel are used to produce weapons-grade nuclear material. Approximately 2,700 scientists, technicians, administrative staff, and other workers are employed at Dimona. Since the facility was constructed in the late 1950's the surrounding land has been altered to sustain groves of palms and gardens positioned to obscure the facility from the road and air.

Begining around 1958 with French assistance, Israel constructed a natural uranium, heavy-water, research reactor at Dimona in the Negev Desert, about 8.5 miles from the town of the same name and some 25 miles from the Jordanian border. The Dimona facility was constructed in secret and is not under international inspection safeguards. The facility was first noticed by American intelligence when U-2 spyplanes overflew Dimona in 1958. It was not conclusively identified as a nuclear site until two years later. This reactor, nominally rated at 26 megawatts thermal, was put on line in early 1964. However according to Pierre Pean, French officials were surprised to discover that the cooling circuits designed to support three times the nominal power level, which permitted a scale-up to 70MWt without the addition of extra cooling circuits. If true, the power level of the reactor was reportedly 70MWt from the outset. Perhaps the power level has been increased to 150MWt some time after 1976, according to Barnaby.

An installation for processing irradiated fuel was completed with French assistance in the mid-1960s. Between 15 and 40-60 kilograms of fissionable plutonium can be processed annually. This facility probably has the capacity to produce plutonium for five to ten nuclear warheads a year.

In 1986, descriptions and photographs provided by the Israeli nuclear technician Mordechai Vanunu were published in the London Sunday Times of the Dimona facility. This information supported the conclusion that Israel had a stockpile of 100 to 200 nuclear devices, a significantly larger nuclear capability than previously estimated."

http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/israel/dimona.htm 

Israel's Dimona Nuclear Weapons Factory In 3D

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbjgDERSuiI

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 01:54 | 1850046 Element
Element's picture

Israel already has at least 300 nukes.

 

You don't really know any of that, but even if it were true, so what? Please explain how that gives Iranian terrorists any right to defend themselves from a pre-emptive nuclear attack? Or gives them any right to build a viable credible deterrent against a pre-emptive strategic nuclear bombardment? 

See! ... you can't!  You're making no sense!

So Iran must be clobbered into rubble, for the good of the hole whirld! I'm right, so just admit it! You know this makes perfect sense you goyim monkey-puke schmuck!  Golan is OURS ... we stole it ... and we aren't finished ... so fuck you monkey boy ... you're just a hateful dumb escaped monkey slave ... you fukin HATER!

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 01:58 | 1850061 Ponzi Unit
Ponzi Unit's picture

Israel is the terror state.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 03:07 | 1850064 Element
Element's picture

lol ... there had to be at least one without a sarc bone

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 03:58 | 1850086 Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

God I wish someone would just nuke the shit out of america.

I mean how cunty do we have to get before people stop putting up with it.

Just fucking nuke us already.

Iran china india doesn't matter who. Just nuke the shit out of us.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 06:50 | 1850163 Motley Fool
Motley Fool's picture

OK. Now I agree with Trav. You need help brother.

 

Are you fucking insane? Do you want the end of th world? Do want to die? It would seem so. My reply is fuck you, you go jump off a bridge if you wanna die so badly. I like living.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 07:16 | 1850176 Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

Ok. In about 2 more years of this shit people will using college loans to buy guns and gas cans and thermite fixings and zip drives to hold recipes for c4. And I'm the crazy one.

The problem with complex socieities is all they end up doing is graduating people with ph fucking d's in civil disobedience. All while poorly attempting to mind fuck them with their stupid ass you choose everything in your life. This stupid ass victimization has to end.

What I choose is not on the menu. It's out of stock, and not many people are manufacturing it.

Build complex society collapse, build complex society, collapse, build complex society, collapse.

Abuse the fuck out of simple socieities ridicule them for losing.

Blabber on about sustainability.

The worlds not going to die. It keeps teaching idiots to invest in it.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 11:39 | 1850424 Calmyourself
Calmyourself's picture

Put the pipe down Heph it will be okay..  Complex socieeties do things other than breed fools.  You need to walk away from the doomer porn for a while.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 12:05 | 1850465 Shirley Wilfahrt
Shirley Wilfahrt's picture

Be creative....take some banksters with you...I'll send flowers.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 22:44 | 1851861 CrazyCooter
CrazyCooter's picture

Dude, if you have any financial means at all, please get a place in a remote and beautiful part of the US where you can hike in the woods.

Let me break you in on a little secret; there are three forms of intelligence in the universe. These forms of intelligence are based off of C, Si, and Ge. You sir, are C. The computer that lets me talk to you is Si.

I want you to ask yourself a question; in the history of your species (creation or evoloution - doesn't change the outcome), how many individuals have made it 100 miles straight up from the dry surface of the planet?

You see, what you are missing is perspective. Nothing is any different now than it was 100 years ago, 1000 years ago, or 10,000 years ago. Fossil fuels and the modern society are a virus on a bacterium on the anus of an insect on an elephant. None of this shit matters.

Pretend all you want. Horde your iGadgets. Pay for young hookers. Do coke. Buy fast cars. Eat rich food. Whatever.

What you will find is that you will get old, just like everyone else in the entire history of the fucking world. And when you do, I there are only two things that make it worth while;

  • A life long partner to share the day with, acorss a bowl of oatmeal
  • A life of decisions, contributions, and such that make you proud of who you are

So please spare the youger generations your disdain for life. Perhaps they aspire to do greater things you clearly do not grasp, even if they are destined to fail through no fault of their own.

Asshat.

Regards,

Cooter

Mon, 11/07/2011 - 07:01 | 1852353 Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

There are several forms of intellience on the planet.

Physical material.

Simple biological material

Complex biological material

Socially ordered complex biological material.

The physical world follows the same rule as the complex social world.

You have to input energy to build anything beyond iron. You release energy for anything below iron on the fusion chart.

The too big to fail question is not a too big to fail question. It's a is there enough energy in the system to suck up and build it's nuclear style ordering. If you want to translate corporatism to the physical world they are nuclear bombs. When energy is high they suck up members of society when it's low they "eject" societal members we call it layoffs. The basic particle of their construction is the perSON.

They expend all thier energy seperating and trying to leech off indivduals to maintian their fuel.

Government is iron. The iron is necessary to asorb and collect the energy from the plutocrat corporate worlds nuclear cleaving of indiduals. The classes are shell states. The poor are energy depleted atoms with little reactivity with anything. The middle class are stabile atoms which provide cover for the background physics. The rich are highly ionized and held up as being the "goal" of the energy game. They have to learn the various predator skills and accept the predator skills of the iron and plutocrats to be able to advance.

The end game is a toxic social nuclear nightmare but the plutocrats don't care. They just like the power and they can rebuild back up to toxic structure at any time. Sure they had being lead but they can get back to plutonium through the ponzi machine.

It's advertised as being "over" and complete but the participants don't even have one clue as to what the fuck is going on. So this will continue forever. You can only protect yourself from the plutonium with lead and which is decayed plutocrats. But the lead doesn't care about shielding anyone it just wants to get back to being plutonium.

In fact the plutocrats have several birthing pools filled with heavy water to build up their plutonium brothers.

The plutonium can be disasembled and rendered inert but the particles who benefit from this can't get the energy to do it. Killing every employee of Walmart would make you just a bit tired now wouldn't it. Plutonium doesn't create anything better. You've got insane fucking idiots like that marvell comic guy who keeps saying all you gotta do is get splashed by nuclear shit (waste) and you become a "super hero". That's not true. You will actually become a unviable freak and die because all neutron spitting does is bust the fuck out of dna strands.

This insanity is the big picture. And fukishma is spitting out death and destruction and the crazy fucknut marvel comic book guys and plutocrats want's people to believe it's a good thing and some good will come out of it. If you let any of these processes change you or transform you then you are a complete idiot. If you're not plutonium and sick and toxic and twisted you need to get the fuck out of here and never ever ever ever come back. Because portals to strange worlds and ancestors and stupid idiot indians babbling shit is NOT what is going on. This place is run by sick fucks to feed sick fucks and sick fucks run ALL the transformations.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0n4QG8fvpw&feature=related

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 13:59 | 1850714 Ganja Jane
Ganja Jane's picture

I'd prefer a militia uprising to arrest and bring to justice (I know they don't deserve what they've taken from the populus) all those involved in the conspiracy and let my 'dream team' in to set things right:

Ron Paul, Ralph Nader, Bill Still, Peter Schiff, Cynthia McKinney, Cindy Sheehan, Robert Bowman, Dennis Kucinich....

I play fantasy politics like most 'normal well-adjusted' people play fantasy sports.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 16:57 | 1851082 Ganja Jane
Ganja Jane's picture

@ Ponzi Unit

"Israel is the terror state."

<src> there's no shame in being second to the U.S.!</src>

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 03:29 | 1850072 Libertarian777
Libertarian777's picture

why aren't we bombing North Korea? they already HAVE the bomb. They've already tested it.. TWICE. They've sunk a South Korean patrol boat. They shelled a civilian town. They've said they want to eliminate the US.

So please, lets apply whatever fucked up logic we're using to drum up war with Iran to North Korea as well, and FOR FUCKS SAKE, if you want war with Iran (or North Korea), PLEASE JOIN THE ARMY FIRST, THEN drum up support for war.

P.S. biggest irony is when military or ex-military march as the '99%' in the occupy movement. If they've marching against 'the state' and the police... they forget that by signing up to be military they are the very definition of 'agents of the state'. The government would have NO ability to exercise its power EXCEPT for the military men and women who do its bidding under the pretense of 'serving your country'. How the fuck does threatening Iran, invading Iraq, bombing Yemen, funding Pakistan, attacking Libya etc. have ANYTHING to do with 'SERVING THE USA'? Please come home and fix roads here, build bridges HERE, NATION build HERE, not some godforsaken foreign land. Why are we paying billions to build a fucking road in Afghanistan that just gets bombed to pieces by IEDs when we have more potholes than road in most cities here?

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 03:50 | 1850079 Element
Element's picture

Because the Chinese might strenuously object with 190 kiloton warheads ... so DPRK is a bridge too far.

Iran is not safe.

Iran's only hope is to be able to destroy the capacity to extract oil from the gulf for 6 to 9 months, or more, and do so on a much bigger scale that what Sadam ever dreamed of in 1990.

That's almost as good as a nuclear weapon for making the Nobel-Peace-Prize-in-Chief to hesitate to bombard and invade them, for no real reason.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 05:03 | 1850107 the tower
the tower's picture

Plus, the fact that N-Korea has the bomb doesn't change a thing...

Now, if Iran has the bomb this will bring peace to the Middle-East, and we can't have that.

Everyone knows that Israel has the bomb, so Iran having it will restore balance of power: it won't be used because that would be MAD.

So, Iran must be stopped now or else - we have peace!

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 05:12 | 1850112 Element
Element's picture

That's it exactly, the Nobel Peace Prize princess in the white hut would be at a loss, and Israel would lose a lot of their influence over US foreign policy ... they would revert to a lower strategic status ... and have to behave themselves ... we can't have that ... so they militate for a thoroughly unjust and unnecessary war...  that may kill hundreds of millions of people.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 06:43 | 1850158 Abitdodgie
Abitdodgie's picture

It will only kill the stupid people (you know the ones that sign up ) so bring it on 

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 07:38 | 1850186 Element
Element's picture

Not so at all, REAL wars roll through entire countries and destroy all cities and towns.

Ordinary people live in these.

The military casualties would be small, compared to the massive civilian fatalities, injuries and material losses.

People today have never seen a REAL war.

Vietnam was a comparitive skirmish, Korea was a mere pocket of stiff resistence, Desert Storm was a murder-fest, and the invasion of Iraq resulted in a slaughter, followed by a fairly prosaic civil insurgency and Afganistan is much the same, but with more criminal gangs and warlords selling drugs.

In WWII there were days when >100,000 people died -almost all civilians.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 11:24 | 1850399 JustObserving
JustObserving's picture

Enough civilians died in the Iraq war.  Per the Bristish Medical Journal, Lancet, there were more than 650,000 extra deaths in just 3 years after the invasion - war always kills civilians in numbers you would not believe:

"The Lancet study's figure of 654,965 excess deaths through the end of June 2006 is based on household survey data. The estimate is for all excess violent and nonviolent deaths. That also includes those due to increased lawlessness, degraded infrastructure, poorer healthcare, etc. 601,027 deaths (range of 426,369 to 793,663 using a 95% confidence interval) were estimated to be due to violence. 31% of those were attributed to the Coalition, 24% to others, 46% unknown. The causes of violent deaths were gunshot (56%), car bomb (13%), other explosion/ordnance (14%), airstrike (13%), accident (2%), unknown (2%). A copy of a death certificate was available for a high proportion of the reported deaths (92% of those households asked to produce one)."

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 11:42 | 1850432 Calmyourself
Calmyourself's picture

The lancet study was provewn to be a huge pile of shit by many many folks i nfact they later pulled it and revised it greatly.  Were there many killed yep that happens.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/warner-todd-huston/2008/02/09/us-has-killed-655-000-iraqis-soros-funded-lancet-study-debunked

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 12:19 | 1850482 trav7777
trav7777's picture

that is just "regrettable collateral damage," my friend.

We are ok once they are "terrorists," otherwise looking at a muslim sideways is RAYCISS.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 15:52 | 1850971 matrix2012
matrix2012's picture

Isn't that mass killing serving well the NWO purpose to cull the human population? Remember, it has been 7 billions

Just imagine, oil oil oil, MIC, then population reduction...so many bonuses :D

at least killing two birds with one stone!

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 18:06 | 1851267 Element
Element's picture

Well, there is that ...

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 11:54 | 1850449 delacroix
delacroix's picture

Iran does have a bomb, what they don't have is fuel, for all the copies

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 06:02 | 1850127 Vlad Tepid
Vlad Tepid's picture

China would never go nuclear, or conventional, to save NK's chestnuts again.  They could however object with a 190 kiloton "we've got America by the economic balls."  Plus the US hasn't been in the habit of picking on people that have a chance of shooting back for some time now.  Hence no NK.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 06:45 | 1850151 Element
Element's picture

Not so sure about conventional, as they do have a Vietnam proxy type option.

China only has the US by the balls for as long as the US people allow that illusion to continue.

The US (and Russia) have runs on the board, and mostly China doesn't, in so many respects, despite the MSM myth.

And there is Pakistan, a case of the US attacking a country that has deliverable nukes.

I take your point though the US has no real conventional challengers that can shoot back for long.

But an EMP could change that rather dramatically, and quickly.

Russia (and somewhat China) could mount a sustained EMP barrage that could go on for weeks, and totally wreck and starve the USSA and NATO, without even hitting a single city, or a military area-target.

That is easily the most probable outcome of an exchange, (and also why a NATO long-range missile shield is so dangerous, because it aims to eliminate that EMP deterrence option, via early boost-phase interception combined with pre-emption ... extremely dangerous!).

As a result I don't assume much in such things (though many do, especially in the US), except that deterrence works brilliantly so far, so why would you go without, if you can get it?

You won't, and Iran also won't.

In addition, I'll say, so many people talk of Germany being or becoming the big power in Europe, but Germany is almost defenceless in any real strategic battle.

Don't forget who is really boss, when push comes to shove. Germany will have to pull its head in, and the failure to understand this is leading people to misunderstand the underlaying real power network in Europe.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 16:18 | 1851003 Michael
Michael's picture

Don't forget China has tested kinetic energy space bombs that can render the satellite space inoperable for hundreds of years, or till we get around to cleaning up all the space derbies that will be floating around up there.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 15:55 | 1850976 11b40
11b40's picture

No oil in Korea.  Peiod..end of story.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 07:57 | 1850201 Hobbleknee
Hobbleknee's picture

Why are we paying billions to build a fucking road in Afghanistan that just gets bombed to pieces by IEDs when we have more potholes than road in most cities here?

 

Drugs, gold, oil.

Once you understand that the government is just a criminal mob, all it's intentions are pretty obvious.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 09:57 | 1850310 WonderDawg
WonderDawg's picture

And even gold is secondary to the oil and drugs. Crossing the Rubicon sheds some light on understanding the machine.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 10:48 | 1850355 knukles
knukles's picture

Morning Dawg!
Read your note from yesterday concerning sociological trends and societal conditions.  I could not agree with you more.  Unbeknownst to me (maybe a lack of acuity, awareness or some form of confirmation bias) most people completely miss those trends, events and relationships of which you spoke.  For most do not (I believe)  think that deep, are not thinking of examining character's motivations of actions. 
I'm absolutely on board... and in fact feel some relief, indeed a measure of sanity, that another one of us sees it the same way.
The signs and relationships are everywhere.  Absolutely plain as day.  Betcha if it/reality as we percieve it were a Dan Brown novel people would eww and ahhh over it, commenting about just how "insightful" and "what truth" is contained therein.  And then forget about the lesson so to speak a few moments later. 
Just like so many in life who claim to be principled but do not even try to practice such in all their affairs.  And never even think along those lines.  Ah, miracles do happen, eh?  Love the Rubicon comment :)
Great observations... and thanks again for the Sanity Island Reality Check.
Have a wonderful day.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 11:35 | 1850415 WonderDawg
WonderDawg's picture

Hey, Knuks! Thanks, there are a few people around here who get it. Understanding motives and the turbulent undercurrents behind them provides clarity, but also results in frustration when most of those around you don't understand and react out of ignorance. Patience and tolerance, don't ya know ;-)

Have a nice Sunday yourself. (Remember when you used to hate Sundays because Monday was right around the corner? It's nice to enjoy Sundays again)

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 18:26 | 1851314 knukles
knukles's picture

Amen to that... enoying Sundays again :)
As you'd made mention of elsewhere, the "Rubicon" having been crossed... everything has become "enjoyable".
Ya'll keep comin' back now, ya'hear? 

:) ad infinitum

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 10:05 | 1850317 Oleander
Oleander's picture

Afganistan has large mineral/rare earths deposits worth about 3 trillion dollars. No way US gov't wants to let that get away.  We are in Afganistan for the long haul.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 15:52 | 1850970 Oh regional Indian
Oh regional Indian's picture

Actually, the whole international "system" is main-lining on the drug trade. Oil is a necessary evil in this industrial society. Drugs (especially pharmacological ones) is the un-necessary one.

http://aadivaahan.wordpress.com/2011/10/18/more-ows/

ORI

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 08:48 | 1850244 RafterManFMJ
RafterManFMJ's picture

 

 

THIS JUST IN!! North Korean patrol boats fire on US destroyers USS WarProfit and USS FalseFlag in the Gulf of Tonkin!  American 'advisors' being sent to S. Korea on the invitaion of that countries friendly and Democratic government! North Korean troops have blown up a S. Korean radio station just across the border!  The USS Maine, recently raised, has again blown up and reports indicate shifty North Koreans were seen in the area!

I'd type more, but I'm off to enlist!  We haven't won a war since '45 but by gum, I've gotta good feelin' about this one!

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 11:16 | 1850391 optimator
optimator's picture

Why bomb North Korea?  If they are ever a threat to Israel it will be on the target list for us.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 11:53 | 1850448 RiverRoad
RiverRoad's picture

OK.  But let's make sure we do it on a day the fallout blows NE.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 15:36 | 1850945 Honey Badger
Honey Badger's picture

North Korea doesn't export oil.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 08:19 | 1850219 frenchie
frenchie's picture

jew huh ?

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 15:52 | 1850968 Michael
Michael's picture

We now start wars over hypothetical situations. Can We please not start WWIII, where a third of the nations are destroyed and 2 billion people killed. It's only money.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 03:09 | 1850065 philipat
philipat's picture

Yes, I'm sure the Iran intelligence (sic) is impecable, just like with Iraq. A new war right now, with either Iran or Pakistan (I don't think TPTB have made up their minds yet) would suit the Military/Industrial complex quite well, would help drain away what little wealth remains in the Middle Class and would be better than "Dancin with the stars" at distracting attention away from the real issues of a bankrupt US. God bless America.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 03:15 | 1850067 Element
Element's picture

Only target pod and bomb-cam footage rates better than dancing with the stars ...

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 03:42 | 1850075 cranky-old-geezer
cranky-old-geezer's picture

 

 

Iran doesn't need a single nuke. 

China and Russia have more than enough nukes to keep America / Israel / NATO (North Atlantic Terror Organisation) out of Iran.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 04:28 | 1850096 Element
Element's picture

The problem is the Iranians are not going to rely on that for their strategic security and freedom of action (would you?). They do want their own, and they will almost certainly get it.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 04:42 | 1850100 cranky-old-geezer
cranky-old-geezer's picture

 

 

It doesn't matter if Iran wants their own nukes or not.  Iran supplies much of China's oil.  China and Russia have a firm nuclear alliance pact, which Americans know nothing about.  If America  or it's little dipshit proxy Israel or NATO go into Iran, that little dipshit proxy Israel will be turned to glass and ash just to drive the point home, stay the fuck out of Iran America or we'll turn some of your cities to glass and ash.

This whole thing is heading up to the nuclear level faster than any of us realize.  Russia and China together have a nuclear arsenal far outclassing America and Israel together, and they have no fear of pushing the buttons.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 04:55 | 1850102 Element
Element's picture

Not so sure either of those powers would take the risk of not totally succeeding in a strike on Israel ... the Joos tend to anticipate such things in a davance ... being the deviates they are.

I don't think Iran want's to be second-fiddle to anyone else's nuclear arsenal, and are determined to stand on their own feet once their oil (and others) is not so plentiful anymore ... but is in much higher demand.  They have a dire strategic imperitive to prop-up their own interests and future, regardless of China and Russia's current variable strategic whims or trends.

Stuff like that changes. The Iranians can not risk that, and they won't.

I think Russia and China both have an historically very clearly demonstrated fear of pushing the button, as does the USSA ... Israel however certainly might do it though.

I would trust the Iranians more more with nukes than Jerusalem.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 04:56 | 1850104 cranky-old-geezer
cranky-old-geezer's picture

 

 

Think whatever you want.  I've told you how it will play out.

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 04:57 | 1850105 Element
Element's picture

ha ... yeah ... ok

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 11:47 | 1850440 Calmyourself
Calmyourself's picture

Okay cog, and how exactly do the Russkies and Chinese take out the Israeli subs holding cruise missiles?  Subs with an underwater range of half the world on very quiet electic motors?  Answer; they do not and what is their strategic interest Russia in particular, the Nuke program and 200 scientists in Iran, they will lose Moscow for 200 nuke scientists in Iran sure they will...

Sun, 11/06/2011 - 05:08 | 1850111 the tower
the tower's picture

And it's not like anyone would care what happens to Israel in the end, cause it's only Russian jews there now, and no-one cares about them.

All the "real" jews live in Europe and the USA, so IF Israel would fall all that is lost is strategic territory - which is what this is all about. 

The - limited - use of nukes is therefore possible, cause no "real" lives would be lost in Israel.

Just saying, probably the average Christian or Muslim cares more about Israel as a Holy Land than the jews at this point.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!