Deutsche Bank (Part II)
Unless the markets can take out its September highs, we could very well see a repeat of the 1987 Crash.
The euro “might start to unravel” if Deutsche Bank collapses according to respected financial journalist, Matthew Lynn. “It all has a very 2008 feel to it …” he warns and outlines his and our growing concerns about Deutsche Bank.
So far, so good as far as euphoric stock bubbles are concerned... but now what?
Tyler's patience - vs. - ?
AAPL (green) vs Housing starts
AAPL vs POT?
AAPL vs Erectile Dysfunction
BRK-A once everyone realizes that old Uncle Warren, with his banjo, has been the beneficiary of crony capitalism?
aapl versus usa voter turnout
History repeating itself.
That's my guess as well. AAPL vs AAPL circa tech bubble detonation - turn of the century.
Stellar Wind Jon Corzine gyrotron semtex Emile Autouri signals intelligence Julie Newmar Fort Meade thermobaric Hedy Lamarr terror bomb Farrah Fawcett anthrax Guantanamo shopping mall polonium Charles Nelson Reilly claymore mine Dirty Sanchez grenade launcher lutefisk IED assassinate Studebaker Hoch hijack Al Qaida Joyce DeWitt ricin SMERSH electromagnetic pulse Wink Martindale Hezbollah Federal Reserve CIA border Mossad Lady Gaga detonator Lemmiwinks Santorum calutron June Foray plutonium Juarez Bank for International Settlements Cayman Islands MANPADS nuclear trigger Cleveland Steamer crop duster Howard Cosell Forex Myrna Loy Fx Trading borax LMAX parrot and parakeet training tape International Monetary Fund carbuncle RPG clostridium Olde Frothingslosh ebola Joey Heatherton Dimona smuggle roachclip Butthole Surfers bongwater National Reconnaissance Office Don Rickles Backstreet Boys jimsonweed Edward G. Robinson steganography Lily Langtry Captain Beefheart 27B-6 Lee van Cleef kaopectate
Bottom chart: NFLX vs APPL?
I'm with you on NFLX.
Yes, it's AAPL vs NFLX.
looks just like my 401K ! (now my 201K)
Missed a decimal place.
There fixed for you.
When ZH starts overlaying AAPL on NFLX without regard for their respective P/Es, then the ZH AAPL-bashing short (where ZH toes the same line as CNBC) is clearly warping into hyper-overdrive.
I like eggnog.
Hey, Springer is on!
nom nom nom
my vote: FAZ/^VIX
I'm not sure if I'm reading this correctly, but according to the second chart, it looks like $200 is ZH's implied prediction of where Apple is headed. The only way I'd agree with that is if Tim Cook converted Apple's entire cash hoard into silver.
Max Fischer, Civis Mundi
...or if the producers of the raw materials and energy for all those ipads stop accepting said paper.
Funny u should mention beanie babies, I saw the beanie baby Boeing Businees jet that Ty owns in Cabo 3 weeks ago.
50 million dollar machine. Thats alot of stuffed toys.
Wondered how he can still afford to run that thing?
This represents how fast Carla Bruni will bail out the door once the French Midget Sarkozy is dethroned from the empire of the stinky armpits!
How many times "Ron Paul" is mentioned in the MSM?
.. errr Gold ?
The implied comparison between AAPL and NFLX is so insulting to AAPL fundamentals that ZH, with this maximum AAPL-bashing "snark on", will trigger a VW-type short squeeze reversal on AAPL intraday today.
Wouldn't you love that Plunger Boy? I prefer to ride the Tyler Durden AAPL squeeze of 23 April 2012 on leverage... AAPL green as I type.
ZH lets their emotions get in the way of investing. Apple was trading at $14 in 2004, everyone on this board wished they would have bought Apple back then. They salivate at apple stumbling because they weren't smart enough to invest in the greatest company of the past 10 years. Apple vs. Netflix is a stupid comparison. ZH has never demonstrated their ability to pick stocks or evaluate them that I can recall since I've been on this board. Feel free to post anything that I have missed.
and AAPL was $31 in 2000. Your point is ?
$31 in 2000
$14 in 2004
$600 in 2012
Maybe we should entertain the possibility that buy and hold is a sucker's game? Hmm?
Well, buying AAPL at $14 or $31 and riding it to $600 fits a good "buy and hold" strategy (in hindsight)
Buying AAPL at $600 and expecting it to rise to $12,000 - $43,000 means selling a lot of electronic hoola-hoops.
At $100/share cash, they are not going to drop into oblivion quickly either.
Agreed if you had known in 2000 it would go to 14 (actually went a good bit lower) you would have been stupid to buy and hold.
But you didn't know. Buy and hold protects you from your own stupidity.
ZH lets their emotions get in the way of investing.
ZH lets their emotions get in the way of investing.
The way YOU define "investing" it does.
Most of us here are in real assets. Let us know how that "buy and hold" works out, because if you are "buying, then selling, then buying" you aren't investing, you're TRADING.
Now for a TRADE... Yeah, AAPL was awesome. But it's looking a little long in the tooth right now, and the USD looks like the best short term bet (or maybe VIXY).
the Tyler Durden AAPL Short Squeeze of April 23 2012 was pretty impressive. One for the record books.
what AAPL fundamentals? Selling high-margin yet technically outmatched luxury designer gadgets in a niche swamped by competent competitors through the use of a personality cult whose god has now left the ship?Please, do go on about how this is sustainable through a global depression.
AAPL is the new global "flexible accumulation" retail monster of the 21st century. Last time I checked, dead gods are necessary for a religion to grow stronger.
Samsung's SmartPhone -Android`OS = simplicity / best[ed] default browser/ multi-tasking 'nice & easy', and fast - *integration +/+ superior compatibility
Apple's iphone `iOS = Complex/ untrustworthy multitasking - POS 'Flavor-of-the Year', which by the way has flamed-out, period! Cost comparison inflated and monopolized to the point where it's no longer an infatuation, but a so 90's kinda-gadget faze gone terribly full retard!
*apologize double-post :-((
Apple's iphone `iOS = Complex/ untrustworthy, awkward & near impossible fluid multitasking - POS 'Flavor-of-the Year', which by the way has flamed-out, period! Cost comparison inflated and monopolized to the point where it's no longer an infatuation, but a so 2000's generation sub-kinda-gadget faze gone terribly full retard! Bell's and Whistle's are for the enjoyment of the newborns?
Dead prophets perhaps; dead gods... don't think so.
Hi there... I am the almight Gott... and I am dead...what ?????
After all, only so many mortgage payments to be spent on iGadgets before yer in the street.
EBT baby, EBT.
everything stock i have
You must be new here.
...or he has chickens.
grammar not good you has. Yoda master of grammar backwards I say.
Did you mean to say:
"Every worthless piece of hypothe-fucking-cated shit stock I have ever owned in this ponzi cotton-candy rigged casino market!"
(but left out some letters/words?)
Tips: tips [ at ] zerohedge.com
General: info [ at ] zerohedge.com
Legal: legal [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertising: ads [ at ] zerohedge.com
Abuse/Complaints: abuse [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertise With Us
Make sure to read our "How To [Read/Tip Off] Zero Hedge Without Attracting The Interest Of [Human Resources/The Treasury/Black Helicopters]" Guide
How to report offensive comments
Notice on Racial Discrimination.