Guest Post: America's "Do As I Say, Not As I Do" Warfare

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by James E. Miller of the Ludwig von Mises Institute of Canada,

Last week the New York Times ran an article adapted from David E. Sanger’s new book “Confront and Conceal: Obama’s Secret Wars and Surprising Use of American Power” which detailed President Obama’s efforts at waging a secretive cyber war with Iran.  This report coincided with the revealing of the heinous and dictatorial decision process Obama and his close advisers go through when ordering the assassination of “militants” who they conveniently provide no evidence of legit criminal activity for.  The cyber war program, code-named Olympic Games, began under George W. Bush but like most of the illegal and morally corrupt foreign policy initiatives carried out by the former President, they have been pursued ever more vigorously by Obama.  From the continual drone assaults that take the lives of civilians and children to this new episode of covert but blatant cyber warfare, the so-called peace candidate of “hope and change” has revealed himself to be nothing more than another puppet of the affluent military industrial complex.

The success of the cyber attack, which Israel helped develop, has met mixed reviews.  While Obama administration officials claim it put back Iran’s nuclear enrichment by over a year, some experts say the Iranian regime recovered “quickly.”  Whether or not what is known as the Stuxnet virus was successful is really not the matter at hand however.  It’s yet another small instance of the encroaching authoritarianism and lack of restraint that defines the modern day office of the President.  Before the September 11th attacks, it was inconceivable that a sitting U.S. President could order the assassination of an American citizen without the luxury of charging him with a crime.  Now it’s met with a saddening indifference in the news media.

The real issue is what the Stuxnet worm stands for and that is an unapologetic act of war carried out by a government that continually portrays itself as the worldwide keeper of peace.

Last year the Pentagon concluded “that computer sabotage coming from another country can constitute an act of war” according to the Wall Street Journal.  Back in 2010, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton declared “countries or individuals that engage in cyber attacks should face consequences and international condemnation.”

So what makes the U.S. government’s cyber warfare efforts different from those which are denounced as acts of aggression?  The answer is nothing.  Besides murder, state enforcers specialize in hyperbolic statements to shroud their true agenda.  The President goes on television to berate foreign dictators for murdering their own people while happily ordering his own death sentences unilaterally.  Members of Congress tell the American people their tireless efforts and deliberations are keeping them safe while accepting kickbacks from military contractors.  Intelligence agencies such as the F.B.I. and C.I.A. pretend to foil terrorist plots when in reality they find highly susceptible dopes to fill with propaganda, arm, and arrest.  Even your local police department claims to protect and serve while routinely harassing your neighbors with arbitrary fines and refusing to let you videotape them.  And that’s when they aren’t tazing pregnant women or homeless men to death.

The “do as I say not as I do” practice is one of the defining features of the state.  As influential libertarian writer Albert Jack Nock accurately noted:

the State claims and exercises the monopoly of crime. . . . It forbids private murder, but itself organizes murder on a colossal scale. It punishes private theft, but itself lays unscrupulous hands on anything it wants, whether the property of citizen or of alien.

One look at the pathetic state of Constitution in the U.S. shows just how futile the concept of limited government really is.  The document has been torn to shreds by politicians who preached short term necessity and privilege over constrained power.  There is no way one “ Goddamned piece of paper,” as President Bush is alleged to have called it, was going to act as a credible inhibitor to the sociopathic and power lusting aspirations of all public officials.  Mankind has proven capable of developing private systems of justice and arbitration.  Constitutional government is merely a fabrication, like Santa Clause, for gullible adults.

Leviathan’s growth and command over private life is both explicit through outright theft (taxation) and hidden by verbal chicanery.  Those who buy into the naïve notion that “we” are the government have been fooled into unquestioned obedience.  As Murray Rothbard writes:

The useful collective term “we” has enabled an ideological camouflage to be thrown over the reality of political life. If “we are the government,” then anything a government does to an individual is not only just and untyrannical but also “voluntary” on the part of the individual concerned. If the government has incurred a huge public debt which must be paid by taxing one group for the benefit of another, this reality of burden is obscured by saying that “we owe it to ourselves”; if the government conscripts a man, or throws him into jail for dissident opinion, then he is “doing it to himself” and, therefore, nothing untoward has occurred. Under this reasoning, any Jews murdered by the Nazi government were not murdered; instead, they must have “committed suicide,” since they were the government (which was democratically chosen), and, therefore, anything the government did to them was voluntary on their part.

The state purports to represent the people when all it does is leech off their labor in order to commit crimes at home and abroad.  Under the auspices of keeping democracy safe around the world, the foreign policy of the U.S. government has been one of bombing, killing, and overall domination.  Meanwhile, anti-American sentiment continues to spread by instances such as the C.I.A. targeting civilian responders to drone strikes who attempt to aid those who were attacked.  In some cases, the C.I.A. even launches drone attacks at the mourners in funerals held for those in earlier strikes.

These are the measures under which the American people are told they are being kept safe.  What would be constituted as war by any other nation is not so when carried out by the U.S. government.  But it’s all just another facade through which Washington pretends to serve the people when in reality it puts them in even more danger.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
brewing's picture

let's get bombed bitchezzz...

YuropeanImbecille's picture

OR it could be the fact that Americans do not run their own government anymore (Occam's razor).

If you check who owns the media and the banks and provide the strongest lobbying groups in the country (as well as having "Dual citizenship" government officials such as senators among others...), you will find that ALL of these are "dual citizenship" men and women, with their heart and interests in another country.


Obviously I can not say which country that is, because then I would be one of those eviiiiil terrorist antisemitic hatemongerers.

But anyone stupid enough in the year of 2012, to still believe that the government works for YOU, basically deserves all the pain and suffering they get.

veyron's picture

Your use of the pedobear makes you one of those eviiiiil terrorist antisemitic hatemongerers.

GMadScientist's picture

Whereas your use of the pedobear merely makes you an enabler.

Michael's picture

Those people doing drone attacks in the name of the USA and American citizens are INSANE!

I'm not kidding, I believe they are actually criminally insane.

They should be certified as such.

Bob's picture

There's a fine line between genius and insanity they say. 

But it looks alot more like religion:

Obama's just doing God's work. 

Max Hunter's picture

"they" as in, the criminally insane and the morons who buy the bullshit.. Very few social decisions are subjective, even though, that is what "they" want us to think. The truth is not subjective.  Right and wrong are blurred by those that want to do wrong but make it look right.

1100-TACTICAL-12's picture

We have trained a whole generation of drone pilot's. Sit in front of a screen and kill allday. It's the norm for alot of ADD riddled flouride heads.

Clashfan's picture

The Israeli lobby is indeed powerful and worth considering.

To believe that they run the world, though...

If it were merely that simple, why wouldn't the hypocritical WASPs just take everything the Jews have? There are so few of them and so many non-Jews. This makes absolutely no sense without further context.

What is happening is that a Luciferian system is in place. The system is running things. The Rothschilds happen to appear to be the head of that system, and many "Illuminati" families are of Jewish/Khazar bloodlines, true. But the Rockefellers? Not really.

A focus on the system would be more productive than focusing on the one, powerful lobby that is so hard to ignore. Israel is important to TPTB for reasons that are obvious (like maintaining instability in the ME) and reasons that are not (like the Luciferian value of the actual land).

Further, the idea that our government ever did work for the people of the US instead of for the global, elite, Luciferian system--the idea that Jews have somehow usurped something that once somehow worked--is extremely flawed, ignorant, and, excuse me--imbecilic.

Freemasons were chiefs among the founders of our "republic," for example. If one reads Paine's or Jefferson's positions on Christianity, for example, one quickly would learn that the USA was never founded as a Christian nation. The occultist symbolism in DC is just as strong as it is in Tel Aviv.

Sure, one big difference between religions is that the Jews do not go merely by the Torah (though some do--Jews have factions, too) but also use the Talmud and Kabbala (spell it how you like). But many Christian denoms have extrabiblical groups and doctrines that include occultist leanings. Start with the Catholics and look at Templars or Knights groups (Knights of Malta is a good one; Hospitallers, too) or Jesuits. Southern Baptists have tried to exclude Masons to no avail.

Scapegoats exist for distraction. Focus on the Luciferian system, and trace it back in time.

ironsky's picture

"( like maintaining instability in the ME" )

So the Jews get the easy job?

Max Hunter's picture

A focus on the system would be more productive than focusing on the one, powerful lobby that is so hard to ignore.

Very true.  Even though the Israel factor is hard to ignore.

my puppy for prez's picture

I do agree with your thoughts on focusing on the Luciferian thread.  Evil is just that...evil.  But consider this:  Freemasonry is Kabbalistic in nature and theme.  In fact, one rabbi was quoted in public saying that freemasonry would be nothing without Judaism!  

Yes, there are many other Illuminati factions in existence, but none that impose the blatant threat to America more than the Zionists.  Zionists are basically the modern-day Pharisees, who considered their vile Talmud and Zohar as more important than the simple Torah.  

Your thoughts on the esoteric foundations of America are unfortunately correct.  I am starting to read a book that focuses on this topic.  

If you want to read a fantastic book that traces back into very early history, try reading Nesta Webster's "Secret Societies and Subersive Movements."  She was quite the researcher and intellectual.  It's a challenging read, but well worth the time and money.

Clashfan's picture

Thanks, pup. Agreed on all points. Enjoyed this interaction, productive.

Karl von Bahnhof's picture

This was good tip, just downloaded it...

BTW, very good source of reading 

my puppy for prez's picture

You won't be sorry!  Webster was a Brit in the early part of the 20th century, so her use of vocabulary and syntax is of a much higher level than most authors today.  I have enjoyed reading books from earlier times...I feel smarter with every page read!

my puppy for prez's picture

Just looked at that link....GREAT resources!  Thanks!

Green Leader's picture

The Talmud is Edom's response to the resurrection of Yahushua.

I told these words to a Sephardic Messianic Rabbi last week. I hope he understands.

Hugh G Rection's picture

"I know the slander of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan."

Revelation 2:9

Crypto Jews using 'antisemitism' label as carte blanche to fuck the world.

Michael's picture

"Jews" will become irrelevant, so I don't bother myself thinking about this flaw in humanity anymore. I just revel in the fact that they are over-represented on Wall Street and in the current financial structure, and most former people working in the financial industry will be unemployed Jews as their monetary system comes crashing down on them. They should have diversified their skill set.

Unique Snowflake's picture

Oh great. It's not enough that we have guilt in perpetuity for something one man ordered done to them over 70 years ago. Now we'll have to put up with being blamed for Holo2.0TM...the mass sackings of Wall St... 6 million more, hauled into the harsh light of mathematical reality. KristallTagTM

Clashfan's picture

Unique, by "one man," do you mean Rothschild, and are you sure it's 6 million? Or was it 600K?

Michael's picture

Over did it with the nepotism thing. They're always consequences with over use.

Hope my computer doesn't go crazy when I post this comment like it did the last time.

Easily fixed.

AnAnonymous's picture

Freemasons were chiefs among the founders of our "republic," for example. If one reads Paine's or Jefferson's positions on Christianity,


Paine was not a founding father. That is the US citizen liberal left that added it to the stock, when acknowledging that the FF pedigree, life, story and deeds would make it hard to anyone to believe that the US of A ever has ever stood for liberty, justice and truth.

Clashfan's picture

The term "founding father" is vague, AA, but most consider Paine an intellectual founding father.

Maybe you plactice you Engrish now better, okay Joe? Me not know what the roadside shit you mean.

Who China founding father? Chairman Mao? Him biggest mass murderer in planet history, get cledit for kirring 20 mirrion peopre.

You go shit by load now. Bye bye.

AnAnonymous's picture

I doubt China has any founding father.

Intellectual founding father? Sure. If you enlarge it enough, anyone will fit. Beware.

TheFourthStooge-ing's picture

You've been slipping out of character lately, AnAnonymous. Additionally, your english language skills and grammar have been vacillating between adequate and atrocious.

Little doubt remains that you are not a single poster, but rather a trollodex of offuscationary propagandists.

But hey, what do you care? When ranting for rice and renminbi, the word count is what matters, not attention to detail.

The repugnant aroma of your citizenism surrounds you.


AnAnonymous's picture

What character? A new fantasy is being set up?

Clashfan's picture

I've been enjoying your comments for a while, Stooge, and want to tell you that. :)

Btw, "trollodex" is a fantastic word. Thanks for that!

Clashfan's picture

Yes, Tamboo, I like Rense. Not enough folks read stuff like this.

But again, Mullins seems to be blaming all Jews or Judaism, a bit over the top.

This piece also appears on Stormfront. Wonder why? Quotes like this: "the furry scavengers who have found their way through the sewers into every civilized place, are the international Jews." While there are some good facts here, there are few if any citations, and the piece leans more toward hate-mongering than info. It seems to lean toward race-baiting (or Jew-hating, or whatever you want to call it), which can be counter-productive.

Hugh G Rection's picture

How Dare you Yuropean!

Just because Zionists have the largest lobby in DC, own the media and Hollywood, and the Federal Reserve System, doesn't mean we don't still have national sovereignty...

It's antisemitic to point out a criminal ashkenazi cartel thats not semitic, and that commits daily genocide of the semitic people of Palestine.

Next thing you know, you'll be asking stupid questions about Mossad blowing up trucks on 9/11, and trying to blow up the GW bridge. 


What does 9/11 mean for US Israel relations?  "It's very good." - Bibi Nutsandyahoo

Karl von Bahnhof's picture

Welcome to American Weimar. At least we know, what is going to be next...

Clashfan's picture

All of you "Jews did it" folks should really listen to this interview. I have problems with Icke, sure. And Jones' ranting style is irritating, okay.

But the idea that Jewish people are somehow in cahoots and running the world is flawed in many ways.

Few people (okay, maybe a few) have done more to expose the Rothschilds' strategies for world domination than Jones and Icke. And both of them agree on this matter, clearly. It's satanism, not Jewishness or anything else:

New World Chaos's picture

Thanks for your well-researched work exposing the Luciferian/Satanic agenda here.  Keep it coming.  Most people would deny that something so monstrous and unified could exist.  This allows it to grow like a sentient, meth-secreting brain tumor.   Agree that Satanism is the real problem and most of the leaders aren't even real Jews (they're Khazars).

Colonial Intent's picture

If the Jewish people are running the world then they need to drastically rethink their strategy.


Hugh G Rection's picture

You can  scratch Bob Chapman off that list..

Clashfan's picture

Tamboo, I read through this list. One responder defends the water filter another attacks, and one comment notes that Chapman is not Jewish, to which the moderator responds:

"Whether Bob Chapman is a “Christian” or not has nothing whatsoever to do with his biology. Jews change their religion like they change underwear. I couldn’t care less what particular religion Bob Chapman has decided to settle on for this week. It’s completely irrelevant.

You seem to have confused religion with biology. Don’t feel too bad, most stupid people do that, and you’re obviously a stupid person."

Now this is racist beyond belief.

Again, Jones is clearly anti-Zionist and speaks against Zionism and Rothschilds in the clip I posted w/Icke.

Jones breaks stories and gives info that no other site offers. I appreciate the info. It's interesting. I've always known (known for a long time anyway) that he is married to a Jewish woman.

But what should he do? Not accept the Jewish money?

Just because someone's biology is Jewish, does that automatically make the person bad? Come on.

Interesting stuff, and I'll keep it in mind, and I don't think Jones is perfect, but his video on The Grove is terrific, the kind of thing we need.

Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.

The people on this site you offer want to say that just because someone's born Jewish, that means we can't ever like him or her, even after conversion? That's pretty hateful.

Again, not all Jews support Zionism. Even back when the idea was being floated (Zionism), many Jews opposed it.

I will continue to read stuff like this and to try to keep an open mind. Thanks. But Jones attacks the Rothschilds and Zionism plenty. And again, Zioinism is a problem. Occultism is a bigger problem. You would probably be surprised to find how many "Jew-hating" sites are run and monitored by Jews or the government to monitor Jew-haters, actually, too. Good luck with it. When I find sites that do a better job than Jones' sites, I will switch to them. In the meantime, thanks for the info, but the hatred against "biology" is not for me. :)

Freddie's picture

Hope & Change.   Hussein was a CIA op/cutout and Bush's old man was CiA.  After Reagan it was Ivy League CIA stooges.

GFKjunior's picture

Hey idiot, Reagan was the same clown as Bush 1 - Obama.


Vice president- yale, 3 of his supreme court nominees went to Harvard, secretary of state- columbia, secretary of treasury- princeton, second sec. of treasury -harvard, chief of staff- princeton, secretary of defense- harvard, attorney general- harvard, and the list goes on and on. But hey whatever, every community needs an idiot. You one of ZH's premier stooges.

Clashfan's picture

GFK, good points, but Reagan did get shot at by a Bush family friend (and others). This might have affected his presidency? Just a bit?

Not that I'm a big RR fan (at all). Just sayin'. He was shit as a CA governor, too.

Hugh G Rection's picture

True.  Easy litmus test to figure out who was a real president, and who was a skull and boner puppet..


- Did the cartel blow his brains out?

Clashfan's picture

Hugh G. is right. A study of the JFK hit reveals much, almost everything folks need to know about who's in charge now and what has always been happening.

As one explores this crucial moment of history, one has to ask why JFK was ever allowed to be president (by the Shitcago mob or anyone) and why he sacrificed himself. It's easy to see how Ted was given Senator-for-life privileges (like Specter) and controlled by Chappaquiddick. But why did the Kennedy brothers rebel? And how did they break free of their mind control?

We may all have opinions, sure, but I would offer that all presidents are likely SRA survivors with handlers. JFK's handler (or one of his handlers) was likely his father, who had a stroke. After that moment, there may have been some changes in the brothers. Then, perhaps more importantly, a government program involving Timothy Leary, Mary Pinchhot Meyer, and a buttload of high-grade, government LSD may have backfired. "He's changing too fast," Mary said.

Optimusprime's picture

Ted Kennedy "rebel"?   Forget it--he it was who joined with Javitz to pass the 1965 immigration bill that, in tandem with the "cvili rights" movement (anti-white affirmative action forever), has done so much destroy what was worthwhile in America.


JFK another story.

Clashfan's picture

Optimus, maybe I should have been more clear. Sorry. Let me try again. Ted was clearly not the man Bobby or Jack was. I mean to begin with, before Chappaquiddick.

But Chappaquiddick was likely a manufactured incident of some sort. It's unlikely that we'll ever know exactly what really happened there, but it was likely done to keep him controlled, imo.

As for the immigration bill in 65, I admit that I don't know much about that one. I will have to look into it, thanks.

But when I said "the brothers," I meant RFK and JFK, not Ted.

William113's picture

The real idiots are the ones who gave Freddie an up arrow.

samwell's picture

the article avoids the 800 lb gorilla in the room which is the racist, apartheid state of israel dictating US foreign policy.  it has nothing to do with "do as I say, not as I do".  It has to do with israel extorting the US government and therefore the US people into wars of agression that do not serve american interests.  Israel has the beans on the US government via its insidious Mossad spy agency, and if the US government doesn't do as Israel says, then it will be hell to pay.  Iran is a signatory to the NNPT, has no nukes despite the Jew media constantly crowing that they do, and has no intention to create a nuclear bomb.  Israel, on the other hand, is not a NNPT signatory and has actively refused to sign even with US "gently prodding", maintains a bristling stockpile of 300-500 nukes including submarine (dolphin) based aimed at many of Europe's most important cities including the vatican, paris, brussels, berline, london etc and would not hesitate to use them if their paranoia got the better of them.  Who is the real threat to the people of the world?  who is constantly attacking their neighbors, who is constantly appropriating land in the middle east?  who has been caught trying to sell a nuclear weapon to S. Aftrica?  Israel wants to maintain its hedgemony on nuclear weapons technology in the middle east so they can bully all of their neighbors.  Israel wouldn't actually fight a war against the Iranians as would be necessary once Iran was bombed.  The would have their daddy fight it for them as the spilling of Jew blood would be forbade when their is plently of goy blood of US milatary personnel to be spilled instead.  Let the dog catch the car for once and sit back and watch.  

john39's picture

when you control the printing press, its fairly easy to take over a "democratic" government...  as Rothschild bluntly explained so long ago.  people don't believe that a small cabal could accomplish such a thing, but they are naive.  it has been accomplished.  And most who serve the system have no clue who or what they are really supporting.

GMadScientist's picture

Allah is the one true pimp.