This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Guest Post: The Corruption Of America

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Submitted by Porter Stansberry of Stansberry Research

The Corruption of America

The numbers tell us America is in decline... if not outright collapse.

I say "the numbers tell us" because I've become very sensitive to the impact this kind of statement has on people. When I warned about the impending bankruptcy of General Motors in 2006 and 2007, readers actually blamed me for the company's problems – as if my warnings to the public were the real problem, rather than GM's $400 billion in debt.

The claim was absurd. But the resentment my work engendered was real.

So please... before you read this issue, which makes several arresting claims about the future of our country... understand I am only writing about the facts as I find them today. I am only drawing conclusions based on the situation as it stands. I am not saying that these conditions can't improve. Or that they won't improve.

The truth is, I am optimistic. I believe our country is heading into a crisis. But I also believe that... sooner or later... Americans will make the right choices and put our country back on sound footing.

Please pay careful attention to the data I cite. And please send me corrections to the facts. I will happily publish any correction that can be substantiated. But please don't send me threats, accusations against my character, or baseless claims about my lack of patriotism. If I didn't love our country, none of these facts would bother me. I wouldn't have bothered writing this letter.

I know this is a politically charged and emotional issue. My conclusions will not be easy for most readers to accept. Likewise, many of the things I am writing about this month will challenge my subscribers to re-examine what they believe about their country. The facts about America today tell a painful story about a country in a steep decline, beset by problems of its own making.

One last point, before we begin... I realize that this kind of macro-economic/political analysis is not, primarily, what you pay me for.

You rightly expect me to provide you with investment opportunities – whether bull market, bear market, or total societal collapse. And that's what I've done every month for more than 15 years.

But that's not what I've done this month. You won't find any investment ideas at all in these pages. This issue is unlike any other I have ever written.

I'm sure it will spark a wave of cancellations – costing me hundreds of thousands of dollars. I fear it will spark a tremendous amount of controversy. Many people will surely accuse me of deliberately writing inflammatory things in order to stir the pot and gain attention. That's not my intention. The truth is, I've gone to great lengths throughout my career to protect my privacy.

I am speaking out now because I believe someone must. And I have the resources to do it. I am sharing these ideas with my subscribers because I know we have arrived at the moment of a long-brewing crisis.

Our political leaders, our business leaders, and our cultural leaders have made a series of catastrophic choices. The result has been a long decline in America's standard of living.

For decades, we have papered over these problems with massive amounts of borrowing. But now, our debts total close to 400% of GDP, and America is the world's largest borrower (after being the world's largest creditor only 40 years ago)... And the holes in our society can no longer be hidden...

We've reached the point where we will have to fix what lies at the heart of America's decline... or be satisfied with a vastly lower standard of living in the future.

How do I know? How do I statistically define the decline of America?

The broadest measure of national wealth is per-capita gross domestic product (GDP). Economists use this figure to judge standards of living around the world. It shows the value of the country's annual production divided by the number of its citizens. No, the production isn't actually divided among all the citizens, but this measure provides us with a fair benchmark to compare different economies around the world. Likewise, this measure shows the growth (or the decline) in wealth in societies across time.

So... is America growing richer or poorer based on per-capita GDP? Seems like a simple enough question, doesn't it? Is our economy growing faster than our population? Are we, as individuals, becoming more affluent? Or is the pie, measured on a per-person basis, growing smaller?
This is the most fundamental measure of the success or the failure of any political system or culture. Are the legal and social rules we live under aiding our economic development or holding us back? What do the numbers say?

Unfortunately, it's a harder question to answer than it should be. The problem is, we don't have a sound currency with which to measure GDP through time. Until 1971, the U.S. dollar was defined as a certain amount of gold. And the price of gold was fixed by international agreement. It didn't actually begin to trade freely until 1975. Therefore, the value of the U.S. dollar (and thus the value of U.S. production, which is measured in dollars) was manipulated higher for many years.

Even today, our government's nominal GDP figures are greatly influenced by inflation. The influence of inflation is particularly pernicious in GDP studies. You see, inflation, which actually reduces our standard of living, drives up the amount of nominal GDP. So it creates the appearance of a wealthier country... while the nation is actually getting poorer.

The only real way to accurately measure per-capita GDP is to build our own model. The need to build our own tools tells you something important – the government doesn't want anyone to know the answer to this question. It could easily publish data far more accurate than the indexes it puts out. But government doesn't want anyone to know. And it wants to be able to say "those aren't the real data" when studies like ours produce bad news.

So pay attention to how we built our charts. You can see for yourself that our data are far more accurate than the government's figures. Our data are based on the real purchasing power of the currency, not the nominal numbers, which are completely meaningless in the real world.

The question we are trying to answer is: What would per-capita GDP numbers look like, if we used a real-world currency, like gold, or a basket of commodity prices, instead of the paper-based U.S. dollar? What would the figures be if we measured GDP in sound money instead of the government's funny money?

Here's how we figured it out. We took the government numbers for nominal GDP and measured them first against commodity prices, and later (after it began to trade freely) gold. We used a standard commodity index (the CRB) up to 1975 and gold post-1975. The result of this analysis shows you the real trend in U.S. per-capita GDP, as measured on a real-world purchasing power basis.

Our analysis shows you what's actually happened to our real standard of living. The results, we suspect, will surprise even the most bearish among you.

America is in a steep decline.

Americans Are Getting Poorer – Fast

Let me anticipate the "official" criticism of our study. Many people will claim that our numbers aren't "real." They will say that we "mined" the data to produce a chart that showed a steep decline.

That's simply not so. All we've done is convert the government's nominal GDP stats into a fixed currency value that's based on real-world purchasing power. The fact is, our data are far more accurate than the government's because they represent the real-world experience.

That's why our data are far more closely correlated to other real-world studies of wealth in America.

Consider, for example, annual sales of automobiles. Auto sales peaked in 1985 (11 million) and have been declining at a fairly steady rate since 1999. In 2009, Americans bought just 5.4 million passenger cars. As a result, the median age of a registered vehicle in the U.S. is almost 10 years.

Our data shows that real per-capita wealth peaked in the late 1960s. Guess when we find the absolutely lowest median age of the U.S. fleet? In 1969. At the end of the 1960s, the median age of all the cars on the road in the U.S. was only 5.1 years. Even as recently as 1990, the median age was only 6.5 years.

Rich people buy new cars. Poor people do not.

Most important, our data "proves" something I know many of you have felt or perceived for many years. You've seen the decline of your neighborhoods. You've gone years without being able to earn more money in your job. Or you've seen your purchasing power decrease to the point where you're now substituting lower-quality products on your grocery list for the brand-name products you used to buy.

You can see how much harder it is on your children to find good jobs, to buy good housing or a new car. As a result, few people under the age of 40 have the same kind of "life story" as their parents.

And because they can't "make it," many have decided to "fake it." The average college student now graduates with $24,000 in debt... and by his late 20s has racked up more than $6,000 in credit card debt. Meanwhile, median earnings for Americans aged 25-34 equals $34,000-$38,000. (Source: Demos.org, "The Economic State of Young America," November 2011.)

Can you imagine starting your life out as an adult with a personal debt-to-income level at close to 100%? What does this say about the state of our economy? What does this say about the state of our culture?

Who Suffers Most

It's not only the young that are having trouble in America. It is also the old.

Debt levels among households headed by people older than 62 have been rising for two decades. The average mortgage size for this population is now $71,000 – five times larger than it was in 1987 (adjusted for inflation), according to William Apgar of Harvard's Joint
Center for Housing Studies.

Older Americans are also more reliant on credit card debt than ever before... credit card debt. From 1992 through 2007 (which is the latest data available) older Americans took on credit card debt at a faster pace than the population as a whole. According to USA Today, lower- and middle-income Americans aged 65 and older now carry an average of more than $10,000 in credit card debt, up 26% since only 2005.
Given average interest rates of 20% for these debts, it's a fair bet that these obligations will never be repaid. But they will have a terrible impact on the standard of living of these older Americans.

What in the heck is going on? Don't Americans pay off their mortgages before they retire? Don't they work hard during their careers, save, and invest, so they can move to Florida and spend their retirement in comfort?

Older Americans living with credit card debt! This doesn't sound like America, does it? Or maybe it does.

My bet is that most of my subscribers know that something has gone terribly wrong with America. It's not easy to figure out how all of this happened... but you know from your own experiences that these numbers aren't wrong. It might not be pleasant to think about... but these figures paint a sad but accurate picture: America is not the country it was 40 years ago. These changes are warping our economy, politics, and culture.

In this month's issue, I'd like to try to define a few of the core reasons we're in this situation. I can't possibly analyze all the factors that have led to this decline. But I want to document the growth of graft in politics. I want to demonstrate – with real facts and examples – how public company leadership has deteriorated. And I want to document some of the things that are occurring in the broader society, all of which I believe are linked to this fundamental decline in our standard of living.

You see, I believe the decline of our country is primarily a decline of our culture.

We have lost our sense of honor, humility, and the dedication to personal responsibility that, for more than 200 years, made our country the greatest hope for mankind. I want to detail some of the factors that gave rise to the current entitlement society. We have become a country of people who believe their well-being is someone else's responsibility.

I've labeled these problems: The Corruption of America.

These problems manifest themselves in different ways across institutions in all parts of our society. But at their root, they are simply facets of the same stone. They are all part of the same essential problem.

The corruption of America isn't happening in one part of our country... or in one type of institution. It is happening across the landscape of our society, in almost every institution. It's a kind of moral decay... a kind of greed... a kind of desperate grasp for power... And it's destroying our nation.

The Ethos of 'Getting Yours'

Americans know, in their bones, that something terrible is happening. Maybe you can't articulate it. Maybe you don't have the statistics to understand exactly what's going on. But my bet is, you think about it a lot.

For me, a poignant moment of recognition came this month.

Bloomberg news published an article based on confidential sources about how Henry Paulson, the former CEO of Goldman Sachs and the Republican U.S. Treasury secretary during the financial crisis, held a secret meeting with the top 20 hedge-fund managers in New York City in late July 2008. This was about two weeks after he testified to Congress that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were "well-capitalized."
I knew for a fact that what Paulson told Congress wasn't true. I wrote my entire June 2008 newsletter detailing exactly why Fannie and Freddie certainly had billions in losses that they had not yet revealed to investors – $500 billion in losses, at least. There was no question in my mind, both companies were insolvent – "zeros," as I explained.

And yet, in front of Congress, the U.S. Treasury secretary was saying exactly the opposite. Either I was a liar... or he was.
Then... only a few days later... what did Paulson tell those hedge-fund managers?

He told them the same thing I had written in my newsletter. He told them the opposite of what he'd said publicly to Congress. He told these billionaire investors that Fannie and Freddie were a disaster... They would require an enormous, multibillion-dollar bailout... The U.S. government would have to take them over... And their shareholders would be completely wiped out.

Here you had a high-government official, explicitly lying to Congress (and by extension, the general public), while giving the real facts to a group of people who represented the financial interests of the world's wealthiest folks. The story didn't come to the public's attention for two years.

This was the most outrageous example of graft and corruption I have ever seen. Certainly it involves more billions of dollars in misappropriated value than any other similar story I can recall. These managers had the risk-free ability to make tens of billions of dollars, if not hundreds of billions, by using derivatives to capitalize on what they knew was the imminent collapse of the world's largest mortgage bank. Who picked up the tab? You know perfectly well. It was you and me, the taxpayers.

(One of the investment managers present at this meeting was Steve Rattner, who by that point was already deeply involved in another bit of graft, his efforts to bribe New York state pension-fund managers for large investments into his hedge fund, from which he earned perhaps as much as $100 million. He later settled the charges for a mere $10 million shortly after Andrew Cuomo was elected governor of New York.)
The Bloomberg story... about a crooked Treasury secretary handing a room full of crooked billionaires inside information worth billions of dollars... hardly caused a ripple. As far as I know, no actions are being planned against Henry Paulson or any of the hedge-fund managers involved. No other major media outlet picked up the story. I saw nothing about it from the Department of Justice or the Securities and Exchange Commission.

What does that say about our country when even the most egregious kind of corruption – involving hundreds of billions of dollars – is simply ignored?

It seems like everyone in our country has lost his moral bearing, from the highest government officials and senior corporate leaders all the way down to schoolteachers and local community leaders. The ethos of my fellow Americans seems to have changed from one of personal integrity and responsibility to "getting yours" – the all-out attempt, by any means possible, to get the most amount of benefits with the least amount of work.

You can see this in everything from the lowering of school standards (revising the SAT) to the widespread use of performance-enhancing drugs in professional, college, and high school sports. Cheating has become a way of life in America.

I have an idea about how this happened... about the root cause of this kind of corruption and why it was inevitable, given some of the basic facts regarding how we've organized our government and our corporations.

Let me show you the numbers – the hard facts – behind what's happened to our country...

Read more here

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 12/21/2011 - 00:03 | 2000008 TheObsoleteMan
TheObsoleteMan's picture

I couldn't agree more. They laughed at Noah for building the ark, and rebuffed his years of warnings too.....until it began to rain.

Wed, 12/21/2011 - 00:53 | 2000085 alien-IQ
alien-IQ's picture

Why don't you just say what you mean: "Don't rock the boat".

Tue, 12/20/2011 - 23:59 | 2000000 monclerchic
monclerchic's picture

Cheap Moncler
Moncler
Moncler Outlet
Moncler Sales
Montclair Wiki Nj
Montclair New Yorker
Moncler Body Warmer
Moncler Usa Fashion
Moncler Evans
Moncler Sale Men
Wholesale Moncler Vest
Moncler Shopping Online Uk
Moncler Austin Jacket
Moncler Stores
Moncler Vests Cheap
Moncler Usa Shop
Moncler Sale Ny

Moncler Jakker
Moncler Outlet
Billige Moncle
Moncler Online
Moncler Pop Star Frakke
Autentiske Moncler jakker
Moncler Shop linje
Moncler ned Frakker til kvinder
Moncler billige kvinder
Moncler salg Coat For kvinder
Moncler veste til kvinder
Moncler sko billige
Moncler Halstørklæde & Hat
Moncler Wiki
Moncler Jakker for mænd
Moncler Halstørklæde
Moncler Startside
Moncler Herre
Moncler plads
Moncler Halstørklæde

Moncler Daunenjacke
Moncler Jacken
Moncler Weste Outlet
Moncler Damens
Moncler Schal & Hut
Moncler Damen Pullover
Moncler Pullover Rabatt
Moncler Jacken für Männer Branson
Moncler Navy
Moncler Coats Men
Moncler Rabatt Mäntel
Moncler Shop-Ny
Steckdose-Milano
Moncler Weste Frauen
Moncler Westen für Frauen
Moncler Kinder Ski
Moncler unten Jacken Kinder
Moncler Damen Stiefel
Moncler Herren-Schuhe
Moncler Herrenschuhe
Moncler Shop NewYork
Moncler Polo Hemd
Mocler Kinder
Moncler Mäntel Kinder

Canada Goose
Canada Goose jakker
Canada Goose Outlet
Canada Goose salg
Canada Goose sne Mantra Parka
Canada Goose Yorkville Parka
Canada Goose Citadel Parka
Canada Goose Chilliwack bombefly
Canada Goose ekspedition Parka
Canada Goose resolut Parka
Canada Goose mænd Banff Parka
Canada Goose mænd Chateau Parka
Canada Goose CG55 Kensington
Canada Goose Chilliwack jakker
Canada Goose Constable jakker
Canada Goose ekspedition jakker
Canada Goose Montebello jakker
Canada Goose Solaris jakker
Canada Goose Trillium jakker
Canada Goose Herre ned handske
Canada Goose Womens ned handske
Canada Goose mænd Vest
Canada Goose kvinder Vest

Tobacco Pipes
Smoking Pipes
Tobacco Pipe
Tobacco Pipe Parts
Tobacco Pipe Sale
meerschaum pipe wiki
Discount Dunhill Pipes
Brand Pipes tobacco
radice pipes
savinelli pipe
Sebastien Beo pipes
masters pipes
Miniatures pipes
stanwell pipe
takeo arita pipe
peter heeschen pipe
peteratzhold pipe
Randy Wiley pipe
takeo arita pipe
teddy knudsen pipe
Becker pipe
Benni Jorgensen pipe
Brad Pohlmann pipe

Moncler ??????
Moncler ?????? Moncler ????????
Moncler ???????
Moncler ???? ???????? ??????
Moncler ??????? ??????
????????? ?????? Moncler
Moncler ??????? ??????
??????? Swarter Moncler
Moncler ??????
Moncler Damenwesten
Moncler ???? ?????? ??????
??? ?????? ?????? Moncler
Moncler ??????? ???????
???????????? ???????? Moncler

Wed, 12/21/2011 - 00:12 | 2000019 GoldisKing
GoldisKing's picture

Just talked to my stepfather who is a financial advisor about what to do with the amount of savings i've been able to piece together... Ive been reading ZH and understand that gold can hedge against an utter collapse of the dollar and the system yet when speaking with my stepfather he said not to worry about the collapsing dollar and keep it liquid for the time being... question what should i do buy gold out of fear or just keep saving fiat? dilemma 

Thu, 12/22/2011 - 03:15 | 2003605 QuietObserver
QuietObserver's picture

Your question is phrased as though you have to keep it all completely liquid or invest it all in gold.

Why not do a mix?

Also, it sounds like you trust your father-in-law's judgment, why not ask him some more in-depth questions? Supposing it looks like the dollar is collapsing, what would he recommend as alternative investments to liquid cash? If he has already put some thought into it & has some suggestions & possibilities, it will be interesting to hear what they are. And if he refuses to consider the possibility of the dollar losing its value, then it's good to know that he has a couple of blind spots.

Wed, 12/21/2011 - 00:13 | 2000021 pakled
pakled's picture

Actually, except for a quick scan, I took a pass on reading the article, and read the comments instead. Feeling good for that. Remarkable ensemble of POVs.

Wed, 12/21/2011 - 00:15 | 2000026 DalaiLamaInAShark
DalaiLamaInAShark's picture

Ok, chew on this little fact: half the population has an IQ of 100 or less (because it's a Fucking bell curve). Those people are becoming more and more unemployable as technology progresses. Some form of socialism is here to stay. QED.

Regarding the welfare for the rich, I feel Porter's quoting of firearm qwnership statistics is fair warning.....

Buy Gold, Bitchez!

Wed, 12/21/2011 - 00:22 | 2000040 indio007
indio007's picture

What a bunch a crap. First the guy says the dollar is a worthless measure but then proceeds to measure the price of commodities (via an index )in them....

If you going to abandon the dollar, abandon it.

 

Example

 

How many loafs of bread does a week of work get me?

How much land?

How much silver?

How much gold?

How much Orange Juice?

How much gasoline?

How many haircuts?

etc etc..

 

Then you have to start cross-correlating them by amount of  individual commodity.

Then you have to make a taxless and taxed model to compare.

Wed, 12/21/2011 - 00:33 | 2000052 High Plains Drifter
High Plains Drifter's picture

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/70674.html

 

governor of iowa says to ignore a possible paul win...........oh my.............

Wed, 12/21/2011 - 00:37 | 2000057 indio007
indio007's picture

Chris Wallace said the say thing on Faux News

 

http://reason.com/blog/2011/12/15/chris-wallace-if-ron-paul-wins-the-iowa

Wed, 12/21/2011 - 00:42 | 2000061 High Plains Drifter
High Plains Drifter's picture

paul is not loved by so many........

Wed, 12/21/2011 - 01:14 | 2000104 monclerchic
monclerchic's picture

Cheap Moncler Moncler Moncler Outlet Moncler Sales Montclair Wiki Nj Montclair New Yorker Moncler Body Warmer Moncler Usa Fashion Moncler Evans Moncler Sale Men Wholesale Moncler Vest Moncler Shopping Online Uk Moncler Austin Jacket Moncler Stores Moncler Vests Cheap Moncler Usa Shop Moncler Sale Ny Moncler Jakker Moncler Outlet Billige Moncle Moncler Online Moncler Pop Star Frakke Autentiske Moncler jakker Moncler Shop linje Moncler ned Frakker til kvinder Moncler billige kvinder Moncler salg Coat For kvinder Moncler veste til kvinder Moncler sko billige Moncler Halstørklæde & Hat Moncler Wiki Moncler Jakker for mænd Moncler Halstørklæde Moncler Startside Moncler Herre Moncler plads Moncler Halstørklæde Moncler Daunenjacke Moncler Jacken Moncler Weste Outlet Moncler Damens Moncler Schal & Hut Moncler Damen Pullover Moncler Pullover Rabatt Moncler Jacken für Männer Branson Moncler Navy Moncler Coats Men Moncler Rabatt Mäntel Moncler Shop-Ny Steckdose-Milano Moncler Weste Frauen Moncler Westen für Frauen Moncler Kinder Ski Moncler unten Jacken Kinder Moncler Damen Stiefel Moncler Herren-Schuhe Moncler Herrenschuhe Moncler Shop NewYork Moncler Polo Hemd Mocler Kinder Moncler Mäntel Kinder Canada Goose Canada Goose jakker Canada Goose Outlet Canada Goose salg Canada Goose sne Mantra Parka Canada Goose Yorkville Parka Canada Goose Citadel Parka Canada Goose Chilliwack bombefly Canada Goose ekspedition Parka Canada Goose resolut Parka Canada Goose mænd Banff Parka Canada Goose mænd Chateau Parka Canada Goose CG55 Kensington Canada Goose Chilliwack jakker Canada Goose Constable jakker Canada Goose ekspedition jakker Canada Goose Montebello jakker Canada Goose Solaris jakker Canada Goose Trillium jakker Canada Goose Herre ned handske Canada Goose Womens ned handske Canada Goose mænd Vest Canada Goose kvinder Vest Tobacco Pipes Smoking Pipes Tobacco Pipe Tobacco Pipe Parts Tobacco Pipe Sale meerschaum pipe wiki Discount Dunhill Pipes Brand Pipes tobacco radice pipes savinelli pipe Sebastien Beo pipes masters pipes Miniatures pipes stanwell pipe takeo arita pipe peter heeschen pipe peteratzhold pipe Randy Wiley pipe takeo arita pipe teddy knudsen pipe Becker pipe Benni Jorgensen pipe Brad Pohlmann pipe Moncler ?????? Moncler ?????? Moncler ???????? Moncler ??????? Moncler ???? ???????? ?????? Moncler ??????? ?????? ????????? ?????? Moncler Moncler ??????? ?????? ??????? Swarter Moncler Moncler ?????? Moncler Damenwesten Moncler ???? ?????? ?????? ??? ?????? ?????? Moncler Moncler ??????? ??????? ???????????? ???????? Moncler

Wed, 12/21/2011 - 01:23 | 2000114 DaylightWastingTime
DaylightWastingTime's picture

america goes on a crash diet, the rest of the world starves to death. the u.s.a. remains, though only relatively speaking, a superpower

Wed, 12/21/2011 - 01:53 | 2000156 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

 Let's call a SPADE a SPADE!   Pipelines and tax/ cuts.    This is all about a herd of enviromentalists & Union Entitlements.

 

   @ The expense of the American TAX PAYER!   .  Aps. for spelling

Wed, 12/21/2011 - 09:19 | 2000571 GoldBricker
GoldBricker's picture

But I also believe that... sooner or later... Americans will make the right choices and put our country back on sound footing.

There are no right choices, only options. In USSA the options choose you.

Wed, 12/21/2011 - 17:40 | 2002339 shortus cynicus
shortus cynicus's picture

stransbery research - it smells fishy after referencing NIA - another pump and dump scam?

Why at the end of this pretty interesting political text do we see reference to one solar company? How are solars doing now?

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Who_is_Porter_Stansberry

 

stransbery debunked by Peter Schif:

http://www.youtube.com/user/SchiffReport?blend=1&ob=5#p/a/u/0/F9FRMWx0n-w

 

Isn't ZH risking some reputation by publishing "reports" from this guy?

 

Fri, 12/23/2011 - 02:15 | 2006547 malek
malek's picture

>stransbery debunked by Peter Schif:

> http://www.youtube.com/user/SchiffReport?blend=1&ob=5#p/a/u/0/F9FRMWx0n-w

To you and other readers:
Maybe you should read the description beneath the linked youtube video before stating (or believing) something like "stransbery debunked"!

Thu, 12/22/2011 - 03:09 | 2003600 QuietObserver
QuietObserver's picture

Some interesting points in his piece, but two of his arguments make me suspicious this is more of a emotion-manipulating sales pitch than anything else.

He claims only poor people drive old cars. Not so. If you have a car that is reliable & economical to drive, and you choose to still drive it rather than trade in for a new one every couple years, that is frugal. Not poor. In fact, I think the frugal person who drives a vehicle & only trades up when it's a better use of money to trade up to the new vehicle will be much more well off than the person who trades in for a new vehicle every two to three years because they think only poor people drive old cars. It's not really an argument about which is better for gas mileage, service fees, etc., but more an argument about whether someone spends their money based on what works for them, or spends their money based on what they think they should to prove they're not poor.

Similarly, his comment about buying shoddy goods in the grocery store is baffling. Where does this person live? There's a MUCH larger selection of high-quality goods available today, both in the dry goods section & the produce section, than there was even 20 years ago. There's also a lot more sugary drinks, salty chips, and frozen pizzas/lasagna/cake/ etc. A lot of the junk food & frozen food is crap. But the increasing consumption of that crap has a lot more to do with people trading money for time, effort & attention -- they buy crap because they'd rather do that than cook at home (or live with someone who cooks at home).

Thu, 12/22/2011 - 05:18 | 2003638 The Iconoclast
The Iconoclast's picture

Yeah, I don't buy the fleet age argument as a sign of decline, either.  A 1971 Maverick driven in Chicago was completely rusted out by 1973 yet we put 240,000 miles on a '99 SUV before selling it and it still had some life left.  I somewhat covet a few of the new cars yet my '04 is still running great, has cold A/C, nice paint, is paid for, and I just don't see the point.

Sure the 70s kind of sucked but Moore's law didn't stop... computers got about 100X faster and 100X cheaper between '70 and '80 despite stagflation and all that.  What's the value of the Internet to quality of life?  Some would scoff but god damn, I read a Hitchens obit that led me to his answers to a thing called the "Proust Questionnaire" that I'd never heard of, and that led me to Wikipedia and  the defense of Little Round Top at Gettysburg, the mutiny of theGerman General Staff in 1944, and the Arctic convoys of WWII... all in an hour before work and stuff even the most dedicated bibliophile of days past would not have had the time or energy to run down.

It's good to be prepared, cautious and diversified, but I'm not sure these Lord of the Flies scenarios are going to play out.

 

Thu, 12/22/2011 - 05:32 | 2003642 HungrySeagull
HungrySeagull's picture

That old mav would be tuned up and maintained with a set of wires, points common tools and a firing order book. Literally right there in the yard instead of hauling it to the shop to be looked at by computers...

That was then. Now we own 10 plus year old vehicles. one is rarely driven and the other is maintained and driven hard.

 

We aint giving up either one. They are paid for, stable and do it for us. The day we get rid of them would be the day we buy another  vehicle in the used car market instead of a dealership and bank.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!