From the Daily Mail:
An Oregon University professor has controversially compared skepticism of global warming to racism.
Sociology and environmental studies professor Kari Norgaard wrote a paper criticising non-believers, suggesting that doubters have a ‘sickness’.
The professor, who holds a B.S. in biology and a master’s and PhD in sociology, argued that ‘cultural resistance’ to accepting humans as being responsible for climate change ‘must be recognised and treated’ as an aberrant sociological behaviour.
Really? Doubters have an illness? Isn’t pathologising dissidents a hallmark of authoritarianism? Weren’t dissidents under the Soviet Union often sent to psychiatric hospitals to be “treated” for their behaviour? Hasn’t Norgaard read Solzhenitsyn’s Gulag Archipelago?
And really “doubters” could mean a lot of things. Does it solely mean those who believe climate change is not happening? What about climate agnostics? Does it mean those who believe that climate change is happening but that it is not man-made? Does it mean those who believe that it is happening, but who disagree with Norgaard’s proposed solutions?:
Norgaard last week attended the annual four-day ‘Planet Under Pressure’ international conference in London, where she presented her controversial paper to delegates on Wednesday.
The scientists behind the event recently put out a statement calling for humans to be packed into denser cities so that the rest of the planet can be surrendered to mother nature.
And fellow attendee Yale University professor Karen Seto told MSNBC: ‘We certainly don’t want them (humans) strolling about the entire countryside. We want them to save land for nature by living closely [together].’
And does it include those (including me) who believe that man-made climate change is happening — and has been happening for thousands of years — but that it seems to broadly be a good thing?
From the BBC:
Human emissions of carbon dioxide will defer the next Ice Age, say scientists.
The last Ice Age ended about 11,500 years ago, and when the next one should begin has not been entirely clear.
Researchers used data on the Earth’s orbit and other things to find the historical warm interglacial period that looks most like the current one.
In the journal Nature Geoscience, they write that the next Ice Age would begin within 1,500 years – but emissions have been so high that it will not.
Certainly, if human emissions keep the Earth warmer than the pre-human cycle (i.e. widespread cyclical glaciation), that would appear to be a good thing in the long run for human civilisation.
And what about my position that a ultra-complex (and arguably stochastic) system like the climate is not meaningfully modellable, and therefore that climate certainty is impossible? While it seems to make sense that higher levels of atmospheric CO2 will produce higher temperatures, and while there are a myriad of simplified models out there that seem to suggest the same thing, there is no substitute for long-term empirical evidence, of which we have very little. In a system as complex as the Earth’s climate, there could be a whole swathe of effects that we have not yet identified that could drastically change the outcome (for better, or for worse). For Norgaard, does an understanding of the limitations of probabilistic modelling constitute a mental illness? Should I be committed to treatment to “cure” me of my beliefs?
Because that is what Norgaard’s words lead me to believe. And that sounds worryingly like Neo-Stalinism.



Guest post of the year
I looked up the definition of 'Fugly' in the Urban Dictionary. No words, no description, just her face. The picture says it all.... even 5 beers, 3 vodka shots and a super long dry spell couldn't make me do her.
nice set of choppers she's got there. professor, meet your friend the toothbrush...
With apologies to Ian Drury and the Blockheads:
Hit me with your ugly stick, hit me, hit me!
Hit me with your ugly stick, hit me, hit me!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WGVgfjnLqc&ob=av3n
She looks like a typical Democrat woman.
... a date for Senator Barbara Milkulski?
She looks more like Jerry Lewis in drag. Who knows, perhaps Jerry was stroking off and some stuff hit a tree and now we have Kari.
In her defense, she was probably teased and bullied throughout childhood for her... uh... face (god-awful). Now she probably hates humanity and wants an excuse to hate it.
True enough. Life must be difficult for her and so she hates us all.
I enjoy hearing them come out with this BS. These eco-nazis are self destructing and their crazy rhetoric is waking up the masses of people to the nwo agenda.
So, if I don’t agree with that ugly c—t does that make us both racist’s?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Unx2xYIc8g
New Private Security Contractors Unload on Somali Pirates Trying To Hijack a Ship
Looks like Eco Terrorists will have a much harder time trying to raise hell with the oil boys now!
The pirates ruined it for them.
Thanks for the link! Priceless.
Maladjusted and unbalanced academics suggesting coercive solutions be applied to people who don't share their highly dubious, even deviant, views can only hold authority if they are elevated and given control by the state.
A quick search of the internet reveals just how marginal this character is and, really, how marginal the institutions are that embrace her.
This puppy is ready for the FOMC.
WILLL-BURRRR!
PFFFWWWPPPPFFF!
Thanks for the snicker.
I don't understand why they don't have a Barrett .50.
A single AP in the engine block would stop the attack cold.. an API in the gas tank would do the job, too.
The Coast Guard uses them from helicopters to stop go-fast drug boats.
If a round or two happened to go through a pirate, well.. se la vie.
And, if their buddies didn't get them from their floundering boat, well.. shark's gotta eat, too.
I have stared into the face of stupid...and it is
She probably also thinks 'sociology' and 'environmental studies' are actual science.
With a face like that you got nothin to laugh about.
Faces...nicely done ;-)
Thank ya. Good catch ;-)
Renamed in her honor... Spay With Me
There is never just one cockroack. Its obvious that she is capable of believing this bullshit just like a good party member should.
Don't tread on her. What happened is that she was delivered not out of a vagina, but a rectum.
Geezus, she could eat an apple through a frickin tennis racket!
A solid example of why "a little knowledge is dangerous".
Seems to have 'mongoloid' features. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongoloid
As to her mind and her politico-socio-kultural 'world-view' and dubious conclusions... let's just say ... she speaks for herself.
"Geezus, she could eat an apple through a frickin tennis racket!"
That one broke me. LMAO
yeay me too lol, thanks for the laugh
That face should settle the debate once and for all that natural selection is a farce.
Although some will find this to be in poor taste, they'll laugh anyway:
http://iowntheworld.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/article-2123260-...
This looks like a conga line...da da da da daaah...lol.
No ones brought up the poor unfortunate polar bears?
"The debate about climate change and its impact on polar bears has intensified with the release of a survey that shows the bear population in a key part of northern Canada is far larger than many scientists thought, and might be growing."
Enter over used scientific exclamation "This changes everything we thought we knew!!!" here...lol.
The number of bears along the western shore of Hudson Bay, believed to be among the most threatened bear subpopulations, stands at 1,013 and could be even higher, according to the results of an aerial survey released Wednesday by the Government of Nunavut. That’s 66 per cent higher than estimates by other researchers who forecasted the numbers would fall to as low as 610 because of warming temperatures that melt ice faster and ruin bears’ ability to hunt."
Because clearly without ice, the reasoning went, there's nothing for them to eat...brilliant!!!
"The Hudson Bay region, which straddles Nunavut and Manitoba, is critical because it’s considered a bellwether for how polar bears are doing elsewhere in the Arctic."
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/healthy-polar-bear-count-confounds-doomsayers/article2392523/
And what of poor Knut the Polar Bear?
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/famous-polar-bear-knut-dies-brain-problems/story?id=13196366
He was just as crazy as Al Gore but fortunately for mankind Knut was confined at a very early age ;-)
AGW is not doing so well.
http://jennifermarohasy.com/2012/04/no-global-warming-for-15-years-david-whitehouse/
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/global-warming091307m.htm
http://climatechangefacts.info/Today-Antarctic-Ice-Area-and-Trends.html
http://www.real-science.com/global-sea-ice-area-greater-than-the-1980s
AGW eco-fascist poses for a mug shot wearing three layers of clothes...brilliant
I think the reason is cost. Many of the weapons are kept for one trip only and dumped into sea before arriving.
What is more interesting here, and what I haven't seen discussed anywhere, is what the security contractors did here.
They purposefully waited until the pirate ship was extremely close and then killed a bunch of them. If they had engaged the pirates at a greater range the pirates would in all probability have fled. Almost seems like they are trying to put a message out. Or I'm reading too much into this.
So, what else is new?
If one doesn't believe in Holocaust, this person can end up in a jail in free & democratic European Unions.
If people did not share Nazi ideas, they ended up in concentration camps.
If someone did not believed in progressiveness and humanity of the Soviet system, the person was sent to and tortured in mental institutions.
So, if someone dares to doubt in this "lady" views, let us send these people to reeducation/extermination places?
It is amazing how fast America became a fascist state. The 9/11 took place just 10 years ago.
nice shootin there tex. boat to boat shot, moving targets, with a sweet spot of about a one foot cube. exactly what futuristic app are you calculating trajectory with?
Im sure he makes shots like that every day on Call of Duty.
Remember...
we PAY for our kids to listen to her drivel at
high schools and colleges from coast to coast.
Imagine the effectiveness of a security force that actually used the aiming sites built into a modern assault rifle! Imagine using a weapon in the manner for which it was designed! Shooting from the hip on a moving ship at a wave-running jetski is the definition of cowboy bullshit. This looks more like a "training or marketing video" shot from a steady-cam.
LOL have you been smoking crack?!?
Noone shot from the hip in this video, it was all carefully aimed fire. Those pirates are mincemeat. I mean if you're going to play armchair general at least have some fucking clue.
This does not look fake at all, and if you think so you are a fucking moron. Just the collision (probably due to dead driver) would have been enough to seriously hurt the pirates.
The reason for the relatively basic gear is cost. These weapons are often only kept for one voyage then dumped in the ocean to avoid legal hassles at destination. Besides the iron sights seemed to have worked fine for the situation.
...special discounts available to NRA members:
http://www.tothepointnews.com/content/view/3617/85/
New Private Security Contractors Unload on Somali Pirates Trying To Hijack a Ship
Q: Why are they shooting popguns in a scenario that is most likely to be carried out in high wind at extended range?
A: Because they were trained on those weapons, and don't know how to operate anything else. The tacticool gloves make up for any inherent weakness in the armament. Plus, I am very impressed by their use of pallets for cover.
JHFC
So if free & objective thinking is a sickness, will the lobotomy be covered by Obamacare?
Distributing images of her face on a widespread and ongoing basis will dramatically curb "the mood," thus heralding in population shrinkage (and shrinkage of another kind).
The truly fugly ones always seem to be the bossiest. Anyone remember Lani Guinier?
Those breed of chap's hibernate in Eugene and Corvalis Oregon. Spent a few day's there, won't take long to see the real sickness. Look's like in-bredville in berkinstock's.
There rude, nasty, stinky little fucker's to, I shit you not. Especially when you tell them your a logger lmfao.
I graduated from UofO and went to OregonState for a few years. OSU was filled with engineers and conservative and UofO was liberal, but not quite communist. I've heard theyve both turned downhill (as have most public universities). When I get the UofO alumni letters begging for money, I throw them in the trash can. Why contribute to the brainwashing of the next generation
I want to just make clear that I'm not superficial to the point of highlighting the deficits in the appearance of people typically, and only resort to such admittedly juvenile behavior when someone really is so abrasive and dogmatic that it's literally hard to tolerate.
If I were ablet o debate her, I'd not resort to such low tactics. Speaking of low, she hit every branch falling down the ugly tree.
She really should have stuck to doing radio.
Apparently so, everyone with federal healthcare in the administration and congress seems to have had one.
-
I immediately thought of John Belusi's response to Flounder pledging. Of course, the rest of the crowd, similar to ZH, joined in. I believe the movie was filmed in Oregon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMENQeCbxfI
ALL tests supporting "proof" of global warming have been discredited.
Who's "living the lie", now?
That was a scam evolved by Al Gore to promote switching to Natural Gas........after he bought TONS of gas producing land.
Don't forget the carbon credit derivatives scam that he developed with Goldman Ballsacks. Wall Street would force everyone in the world to buy worthless pieces of paper for the privilege of using electricity and exhaling
What's with the ad hominem attacks on this poor creature who is admittedly not the most photogenic person in existence? I realize that the original post draws us ever so subtly in that direction with the title "The Face of Authoritarian Environmentalism." But can't we just stick to bashing her for her batshit crazy authoritarianism? It is the policies she recommends which are indefensible, after all.
I will credit the Jerry Lewis in drag comment as being genuinely funny, however.
But can't we just stick to bashing her for her batshit crazy authoritarianism?
OK. Here from last week:
The effort to re-brand legitimate scientific dissent as a mental disorder that requires pharmacological or psychological treatment is a frightening glimpse into the Brave New World society climate change alarmists see themselves as ruling over.
http://www.infowars.com/climate-change-skepticism-a-sickness-that-must-be-treated-says-professor/
By PAUL KRUGMAN Published: June 28, 2009 And as I watched the deniers make their arguments, I couldn’t help thinking that I was watching a form of treason — treason against the planet. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/29/opinion/29krugman.htmlAll due respect, but I think it is really important that we dont mention krugmans name. Krugman reads zero hedge but does not have proper education or credentials. Unfortunately, he is probably the smartest person on Bammers economic team. I think we need to not mention krugman at all, for any reason. He wont be the one fighting in the war he wants us to fight against the aliens that will supposedly fund both sides of the conflict for the good of the economy. I would not say it is really censorship, more of a waveguiding him to more appropriate venues like nikelodeon. (sic)
Can't we focus on the idea that just because she was born cosmetically challenged, she does not deserve a hearing of her batshit crazy ideas any more than someone born of unfortunate socioeconomic circumstances deserves preferential treatment or government benefits as a result? This post has generated over 600 comments in the last 12 hours and most concern how fugly she is rather than how much she needs to be restrained from polluting young minds with this horseshit.
I am not no much concerned with her looks either. At my age, any female 10 years my junior might as well be a beauty queen.
Thats why I focus on what really matters, that has also been aluded to in this thread. We are now being governerned by an abject political class. Socialogy, Economics, Poltical sceince, MBAs, lawyers. Each of these studies is deeply rooted in conflict for the sake of conflict. Not scientific method or even theology. For example, what did mitt romney do in his life to a) earn $56k/day AND b) pay 14% tax on it?
This can not end well. This site focuses on fiat money as what would bring our demise. A good history major would tell you that it was the tax code that brought down rome.
na, nobody gives a shit about the article. this was purely a post by the tylers so we could have fun on a friday junking this zombie...
"But can't we just stick to bashing her for her batshit crazy authoritarianism?"
~~~
Under careful consideration of your thoughtfulness, my conclusion is that if you want to be a "batshit crazy authoritarian", then you'd better abandon the idea if you happen to look like Jerry Lewis (with Austin Powers teeth)...
Well, we could, but calling her the UGLIEST creature I've seen in a while is alot more fun! BTW, that face is an environmental hazard and I think she should be fined everytime she steps out onto a public street without a hoodie or paper bag for visual pollution
Moley, mole mole mole....
+1
Her ideas are much too dangerous to piss away on junking her appearance. It just gives them default points. Btw the somewhat nice-looking Seto also is spitting some of the same rhetoric.
> "But can't we just stick to bashing her for her batshit crazy authoritarianism?"
Ok, she's ugly and has some bad ideas. However, she looks - perhaps not so mildly - retarded. Down's syndrom, anyone?
How can anyone bash her for her batshit ideas if she's a bit batshit by nature?
Instead, I'd bash the idiots who allowed her to rise high enough in the pile to get her ideas published.
just smart enough to reguritate and write papers that the prof wanted to see.
"What's with the ad hominem attacks on this poor creature who is admittedly not the most photogenic person in existence? I realize that the original post draws us ever so subtly in that direction with the title "The Face of Authoritarian Environmentalism." But can't we just stick to bashing her for her batshit crazy authoritarianism? It is the policies she recommends which are indefensible, after all."
Crockett, you act as if brushing one's teeth is not a CHOICE. I know a good many people with crooked teeth (hell, some super models have crazy teeth). But good hygiene is a choice. And a bitter scowl on one's face does nothing to help. If she wants to clean up the planet she can start with her mouth.
Ziiiiinnnnngggggg!
The science is overwhelming but you can't "treat"people for bad religion or I would say let's start with anyone who believes trickle down economics is anything but a golden shower or that reducing taxes on the "job creators" creates jobs and nonesense like that where the evidence ot the contrary is also overwhelming.
haha
Can you grace us with a longer run-on sentence, also without punctuation?
This one was almost confusing....
or that Obamacare is a bloated absurd farce, or that welfare state Keynsianism is pigheaded academic progressives running out of other people's money until they print the world into oblivion, or...
Just because you EviroNazis stomp your feet and claim that your fairytale cult beliefs are a fact doesn't make it so. Go ahead and give your own money to your high priest Al Gore if you think it will save the world.
Yeah, but she's UGGGGGGGLLLLLYYYYYY
This is a brain washing technique to get you simply fixated on an appearance (apparition, whatever) rather than THE MESSAGE. Even if this individual is real and this story is true, why is it getting so much attention? Without the glossy 8 X 10, you have no story. Dismiss these cerebral deflective systems for the allures to get you off point they are. Read the Constitution and your Holy Bible. Stay focused, because it is about to get uglier than this mug.
No, because self hate does have a face and a propensity to be drawn to certain beliefs, and they ain`t pretty
Excellent point Ag Tex. Just like they Sexed up Blythe, this is just workign the other way.
ori
This is a brain washing technique to get you simply fixated on an appearance (apparition, whatever) rather than THE MESSAGE. Even if this individual is real and this story is true, why is it getting so much attention? Without the glossy 8 X 10, you have no story. Dismiss these cerebral deflective systems for the allures to get you off point they are. Read the Constitution and your Holy Bible. Stay focused, because it is about to get uglier than this mug.
....the logic being, do what I say, or you're a racist.
If you buy white bread instead of whole wheat, you're a racist.
This is Fascism.... Consolidated
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3K5RLoNvWI
So much attention from who? I haven't seen it anywhere but ZH. Did any of the lamestream media report on this?
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100148381/global-weirding-the-new-big-lie/
She is referenced towards the bottom of the article but BEFORE the 3221 comments!
Interesting short article here......
"Apparently, the maelstrom of embarrassment and public ridicule created by Kari Marie Norgaard, professor of sociology and environmental studies at the University of Oregon was too much for the University to bear. So, in the best Soviet style, they rewrote history, as if nobody would notice, without so much as an apology or update. I find it amazing in this day an age that University types still don’t understand the Internet and that disappearing things like this only makes it worse for you."
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/04/02/rewriting-history-treatment-of-sceptics-disappears-from-university-of-oregon-press-statement/
Great find. The Tylers should post this info as an update.
+1 and after reading that and some of the responses, I will be more careful with my recyclables on trash days.
I do see her need for a phd in psychology, she needed it to find a gf.
Who's on the board at OSU?
Is Nike a big supporter?
She also has a Scottish relative, was spotted at a European cllimate conference: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_osrVjnPbdEM/SHeczHobloI/AAAAAAAACfQ/kulHe-H871o/s400/upside_down_face_9.jpg
This seems to be common amongst politicians and activists. Daddy issues. Mommy issues. Bad playground memories. All wrapped up and repressed until it gets inflicted upon the world in the form of "doing good"
do good you unenlightened rednecks, or else sensitivity training prior to the electric prod.
And they say Justice is blind..... how about the hiring committee at OU? Can you imagine having to sit through a semester long class looking and listening to her, and pay money to do it?
Beta men plus ugly women equal Democrats!
Actually, a female Jerry Lewis in "The Nutty Professor".
Those so called environmentalists are mentally deranged lunatics. I just thank God for the extended solar minimum making the planet much colder to teach everybody a lesson.
Thomas Dolby - She Blinded Me With Science
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXyFy7ixr10&feature=related
Cash Money Millionaires
Parents of DNC staffer who posted picture captioned “Jewbags” on Facebook are closely tied to the White House
"The parents of a Democratic National Committee staffer who posted a provocative picture captioned “Jewbags” on Facebook are closely tied to the White House and appear to have had business ties to the administration’s failed carbon-trading program.
Dani Gilbert, a DNC Jewish liaison who is the daughter of fundraisers Mark and Nancy, caused a stir in the political world this week when the Free Beacon reported that she was pictured on Facebook in a series of provocative photos with friends, holding dollar bills and referring to themselves as “Jewbags” and the “Jew cash money team.”
http://freebeacon.com/cash-money-millionaires/
Jerry Lewis in drag looked like Miss Universe compared to Professor "Bugs Bunny" -- Eeaah, what's up Doc?
Hey Laaaaaaaaadyyyyyy!
(couldn't find a clip, god knows i tried)
jesus christ!
find a torrent, pirate the movie, pirate editing software, make your own clip....i dunno how, but it all ends with your grandchild wearing a dog collar.
Democrat woman!!! Hell I thought she was the mascot with those horse teeth.
By that do you mean some women who was slammed more times than Hulk Hogan in college/high school, now hates men and makes up some eco-religion so she can sleep at night. Green is the new Red.
These authoritarians are sick, disgusting misanthropes. This professor also wrote a letter to Obama praising his appointment of John P. Holdren as Science Czar. The same Holdren who advocated FORCED, state-run sterilization as a "solution" to "overpopulation" in the 1970s. It isn't science-fiction, boys and girls. Read about the tens of thousands of women sterilized without their consent right here in the U.S. during the eugenics era (1910s/20s). Read about the contemporary women who have been forcefully sterilized without their consent in Peru, China, India and other places around our planet. Then come back and tell me "it can't happen here."
Apparently, if you feel that white First World do-gooder liberals shouldn't have the right to coercively sterilize poor brown women in the Third World, you are a racist. Hello Orwell! Oh, but if you point out that Al Gore and the other 1%ers pushing these campaigns are among the biggest resource hogs and energy users on the planet, you will quickly be silenced and accused of racism or outright treason (see the Krugman quote someone posted below) or some other nonsense slander.
These Malthusian types have been perpetually wrong. Anyone remember the Malthusian hype during the 1970s that said we were on the verge of global COOLING / a new Ice Age? Or those who said America would collapse resource-wise when it reached 250 million people (we are way beyond that).
This is all about CONTROL. Social control over your life. That and MONEY (of course) ... follow the money and look at who will benefit from cap-and-trade (AL GORE, ROTHSCHILD BANK, GOLDMAN SACHS, etc.)
And YES, it is relevant that she is ugly. Just like it's relevant that Obama keeps putting angry bulldykes (Elena Kagan, Janet "Big Sister" Napolitano) into power. These people HATE traditional families, they HATE "breeders," they HATE anyone who tries to be economically independent or self-sufficient (cause then you escape their social control grid), they HATE people who are economically productive in a tangible way (in their eyes, working with your hands = evil resource consumer, who must be an low-IQ idiot). It's all anathema to them.
They want to build a society where all children are taught to identify with the STATE and not with their family. They want to build a society where the STATE determines who procreates and who does not. They want to build a society where children are brainwashed into believing that physiological gender means NOTHING, only social labels matter, and kids are taught that dysfunctional people with major gender-identity confusion (or other assorted "baggage") are role models they should aspire to emulate. They want to build a society where the state controls where you live and most rural land (i.e. places you can escape the State's control grid by living off the land) is off-limits as you are corralled into cities (think "residency permits," as used in places like China). These eco-Nazis are nothng but misanthropic, twisted, dysfunctional TYRANTS!!!
Damn Cris nice job. I want to subscribe to your newsletter!
Also, I wonder if this little communist sweetheart swam to England for the conference - or took a jet?
Damn Cris nice job. I want to subscribe to your newsletter!
Also, I wonder if this little communist sweetheart swam to England for the conference - or took a jet?
...
Not sure why you're getting junked. Perhaps we have alot of british amongst us
i think you're right. she looks like she's been chewing tobacco since she was a teenager...
Oh snap.
That is Change you Can Belive In! Well done folks. You're either with us or against us!
Hunger Games is a "Green Facism" dream world.
not suprisingly its also the dream world of the elite.
It's just an indication at how desperate the Green-activists are becoming because the public narrative on "Global Warming"/"Climate Change" is changing to one of skepticism on the part of the public.
Lets see where have i heard this before oh yes (looks around nervously)
JUDGE DREDD!
Actually, I just read this same damn thing in a book. "feathers on the wings of love and hate".... After that reading this article was friggin' terrifying!
Yes, humanity is a cancer on the skin of Mother Nature is another one of the memes. More Lebensraum for the Spotted Owls. These benevolent fascists are just waiting for there Reichstag Fire and Night of the Long Knives moments. Prefer you in a concentration camp sos to preserve to the forest creatures and the snowy cedars.
21 appreciate ad-hominem argumentation. Hmmm....
When it expresses what was already on everyone's mind, yes.
Ad-hominem as humor gets a +1.
Ad-hominem as a form of desperation when losing an argument gets a -1, (unless its also funny/witty, in which case a +1)
Ok, well, just keep advising Rick Santorum on how he should argue as well.
Is someone claiming that her argument is wrong because she is ugly? Or are they merely insulting her looks?
It's a fine line, but it is there.
What was that Orwell said about 'face-crime'? Damn. The zombie hordes are upon us people. Remember, shoot for the hollow head.
Maybe silver bullets.
Both her argument and her looks are drastically ugly.
She is going to play the horse in the remake of sex and the city
She's "Mrs." Ed !
In England those teeth would be SEXY!
Those teeth. She could probably eat an apple through a picket fence...
Her parents were environmentalists also. They voted out the floride in the water.
Looks like they voted out the toothbrushes too
Phd in sociology (soteriology?), says it all really. That and the photograph.
I thought she was an expert in climate change. Turns out shes an expert in "sociology" - itself an aberrant, or at least abhorrant behaviour.
And what about the medieval warm period when climate was warmer than today (due to variations in the solar cycle). Bottom line: climate variations are too random to be ascribed to any one cause with statistical reliability.
Also; Tylers commentary on the origins of the womans Stalinist (aberrant?) attitudes (very de rigeur in the milieu of academia) is spot on.
What is causing GW, is it solar variation or CO2? Point is, noone can know for sure and anyone who says they do should be packed off to some gulag in Oregon pronto.
Thats pretty much all of you btw.;-)
She could eat an apple through a letter box with them teeth
She looks like Jim Carrey's female body building character Vera De Milo from In Living Color:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fq0XVM0uQLY
Mr. Ed, meet Mrs. Ed.
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!
I'm skeered.
but that will make her do you
Enviormentalism/feminism is a way for fugly people to feel empowered and loved.
When confronted about the above comments and asked if they were her own, Dr. NorPlant replied:
@ Colombian Gringo,
I wouldn't fuck that chick with your cock and Tyler Durden pushing.
That ain't no chick, it's one of them cross-dresser dudes. All references to it as she and her is simply a case of ZH extending some simple courtesy.
A bottle of Viagra, 10 shots of Tequila and paper bag might work, but only for my country. Viva Iran!
Women who are too ugly to get laid by anything resembling a homosapien have been known to suffer from an inferiority complex which manifests itself most often in condemnation of said homosapiens who hold differing opinions and who either look the other way or cringe upon face-to-face encounters. In rare cases, these sociopathic women extrapolate their condemnations to include all homosapiens that don't express violent disagreement with those who disagree the women's opinions, and, in very rare cases, extrapolate to include non homosapiens that have similar numbers of limbs, or similar behaviors in common. One extremely repulsive virgin (of course) was rumored to have condemned cats, saying they seemed to not give a shit what she thought.
absolutely tailor-made guest post - one couldn't have found a better picture for you lads to focus on.
happy fool moon!!
edit for Howard above - of course fugly menz can buy the arm ornament to impress their peers, while fugly wimmenz don't see the point of same.
*lulz*
Does she turn pretty on the full moon or something?
does it help with your wank if I say yes?
Are you good looking?
Professor, is that you?
That's why the pillow case was invented.
Somebody put a flag over her head and fuck her for Amerika!
ahhh, I see, you need an allegiance, you need a flag to erect. . .
We really do look a bit silly don't we.
No sillier than Canada putting up a guy for Miss Universe, no word yet on his golf score at Augusta ;-)
lol, y'know J - tylers bait the hook, but not everyone swallows. . . ^^
best to ya (both).
I sent them the link to Canada's (Mr./Miss) Universe...lol. Sober guys can tell, we'll soon find out if sober Canadian judges care.
How bout a rousing round of Ohhh Canada, sans Adams Apple ;-)
Trump let her/it back in. I think it is a way to improve rateings. Miss universe is now the freak show of the carnival
Somebody has to take one for the team, how do you think you got here?
She could scare a dog off a meat truck. And make that Stalinist, not neo-Stalinist.