This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

On A Gold Standard And The Free Market For Goods, Services, And Money

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Via Keith Weiner or The New Austrian School of Economics,

A free market is composed of people who produce and trade the products of their efforts in exchange for the products of others. The free market is able to coordinate the activities of everyone, and enable everyone to optimize his results. Unfortunately, governments interfere in the free market. They do so by the use of force. The government always justifies its intrusions on the grounds of helping people. Government officials and voters are not aware of the lessons of Frederic Bastiat. The attempt of all to live at the expense of all is doomed. There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch. Rather than helping people, the government’s interference inevitably causes distortion. As destructive as government interference is in the area of production, it is that much worse in the area of money and credit. Every aspect of production and trade depends on money, so distortions in this area are magnified. Unfortunately, the government has distorted the monetary system so badly that both are accelerating towards destruction. The solution, and the only hope for civilization, is to rediscover the principles of free markets, particularly on the monetary realm, and begin returning to a gold standard.

 

The following thesis, while long, examines these themes in great detail; from Rand to Bastiat and the Nine 'Government-' and Seven 'Central Banking Monetary-' Interferences, the case for a 'proper' Gold Standard is clear:

"…if we are to have a dynamic economy with production, trade, invention, innovation, global markets, and growing efficiency then there must be a financial system in which gold flows"

 

Dissertation Final

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Fri, 09/07/2012 - 00:17 | 2770566 prains
prains's picture

governments are run by their corporate overlords what's your point?

 

missed the part where you talk about a "fair and Honest" transaction

must be the old eyes

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 00:26 | 2770584 I think I need ...
I think I need to buy a gun's picture

I didn't hear anything about gold from clinton or obama all i heard is about how great it is to go into tons of debt

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 00:39 | 2770601 Landotfree
Landotfree's picture

The only way you can pay debt back is for additional debt to be created, or what else are you going to pay the prior debt off with?

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 00:49 | 2770630 Dave Thomas
Dave Thomas's picture

Yeah exactly, where are you going to get all those wood toys you've spawned your cottage industry out of? This was all pre built into the system before anyone ever figured out what was going on.

 

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 00:58 | 2770653 Landotfree
Landotfree's picture

Humans continue to pick the same choice expecting different results.   The system is the same as the previous system, which was like the system before it, etc.   A ticking time bomb.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 01:00 | 2770654 Michael
Michael's picture

We should try capitalism some time, instead of fascist feudalism. This is a free book online.

Feudalism aka American Capitalism
by David F.

Feudalism: control by an entrenched minority esp. for its own benefit : social, political, or economic oligarchy.

You are reading this online, so I won't waste your time.

The aim of the book is to provide enough shocking facts about the manipulative practices of America's power elite, that readers will be motivated (i.e., made angry enough) to take part in efforts to bring the richest 1% under control, ...before they impoverish the planet and destroy the biosphere.

The book presents overwhelming evidence that masquerading behind a democratic facade, an economic elite comprising less than 1% of the population is quietly and cunningly ruling America. Their immense wealth and power enable them to exercise so much control over the governmental process, that they effectively operate the country as a Feudal oligarchy. The book will leave little doubt that Government has been serving as a tool to subsidize and legitimize their exploitation of national and international resources, while legislative tax changes have left the nation with a Feudal wealth distribution system.

Presenting the evidence to substantiate this argument is not the main reason the book was written. Documenting the methods used by the elite to manipulate, control and exploit those with less money or power is the real purpose. At least 80% of the book is devoted to documenting their very effective methodology.

While it is evident that most people are somewhat aware that government appears to cater to corporations and influential lobby groups, the average taxpayer is practically oblivious to the extent to which the wealthiest 1% directly and purposely control and manipulate the lives and destinies of everyone else on the planet.

For those who have been brought up on a steady diet of the American Dream, but notice that today's reality and the American Dream seem to be growing further and further apart, it may be worth keeping in mind that if a frog is placed in a pan full of cold water, and the heat is turned up gradually enough, the frog will fail to sense the danger, and instead of jumping to safety, it could quite unknowingly allow itself to be cooked. In a similar fashion, the media continues to be used to desensitize and/or misinform the general public into repeatedly accepting domestic and foreign policies that are very often diametrically opposed to the best interest of the majority.

While the average American does have "a vague idea" that corporations (as well as the economic elite) use plenty of techniques for avoiding taxation; how many know that the proportion of Federal Income tax derived from Corporate income tax declined steadily from 32% in 1952; to 23% in 1960; to 17% in 1970; to a low of 9% in 1985? Without vital knowledge such as this, the public will remain in the dark as to what is really causing the decline in most Americans' standard of living. .

Although the growing deficit and the near trillion dollar banking industry losses will inevitably lead to continuing cuts in the standard of living for present and future generations, most Americans feel powerless to alter their deteriorating economic conditions, and simply take consolation in the belief that everyone else is also feeling the pinch.

Nothing could be further from the truth !

http://www.mindmined.com/public_library/nonfiction/david_f_feudalism_aka_capitalism.html

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 01:28 | 2770669 Michael
Michael's picture

A gold like standard and the US Constitution strictly abided by, are fair for everyone rules of the game that should not be breached for the benefit of a few, ever!

Because it gets out of control and makes it unfair for the 99%!

It's that simple folks.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 02:34 | 2770758 Michael
Michael's picture

Got Guns & Ammo?
Good.

I should make this my signature line.

I just made this up.  It's like that Got Popcorn? (meme)

People should make bumper stickers out of this saying.

People should make T-Shirts with "Got Guns & Ammo? on the front and "Good." on the back.

I give this to you for free.  Have at it.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 06:46 | 2770872 economics9698
economics9698's picture

Mike, has the FBI been questioning you lately?


Our government and central bank is a bunch of thieves, and???

Like we don’t know this?

 

 

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 06:17 | 2770848 proLiberty
proLiberty's picture

"Corporate income tax declined steadily from 32% in 1952; to 23% in 1960; to 17% in 1970; to a low of 9% in 1985? Without vital knowledge such as this, the public will remain in the dark as to what is really causing the decline in most Americans' standard of living. ."

The fallacy here is that taking money from a profitable corporation and giving it to government is somehow beneficial.  Government never spends money more efficiently than a profitable corporation will.

When corporations are taxed, profits are taxed twice.  The econoomic reality is that corporate profits shouild only be taxed when they are passed to the shareholder.   

We should be looking for ways to maximize personal liberty rather than maximizing government by optimizing the amount of tax revenue we allow it to consume.


Fri, 09/07/2012 - 07:18 | 2770861 Bicycle Repairman
Bicycle Repairman's picture

Government got involved in the game, because corporations had become too successful at exploiting individuals (turning them into serfs) and individuals needed a countervailing institution.  Labor unions also played a countervailing role.  Exploitation was not a sufficient reason for some.  In the great depression we learned that the endgame of corporate dominance is societal breakdown.  So government and unions entered the game.  In the years since the corporations have destroyed unions and co-opted government.  And here we are.

As for efficiency, it is not everything.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 06:21 | 2770854 Bicycle Repairman
Bicycle Repairman's picture

@ I think I need: I'm not voting for Romney.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 00:30 | 2770590 GlassSteagall
GlassSteagall's picture

The Occupy Message ... "Private Ownership of Industry is Theft"  or "Shit is Fucked Up and Bullshit" probably won't resonate with a whole lot of Americans

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 07:21 | 2770867 Bicycle Repairman
Bicycle Repairman's picture

The Occupy movement, like the Tea party, was immediately infiltrated and it's message was scrambled.  Part of the scrambling included replacing ideas like "End the wars" or "End corporate personhood" with "private property is theft" or "no person is free until all people wear Birkenstocks".

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 05:54 | 2770839 tocointhephrase
tocointhephrase's picture

They can evict a protest but they cant evict an idea. SILVER BITCHEZ, Bullion Bank Run BiTcHeZ

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 00:17 | 2770569 Dr. Engali
Dr. Engali's picture

So Obummer wants to channel F.D.R. Seems to me that under F.D.R. the United States was dragged into WWII by some old ships that were bombed in a harbor. This gave him all the power he needed to do what he wanted to do. I wonder if Obummer will drag us into WWIII by missile strikes on some old ships in a gulf.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 00:28 | 2770571 prains
prains's picture

and Romney wants to channel Reagan and give us brylcreem hair again

because looking good creates jobs

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 06:44 | 2770869 Bicycle Repairman
Bicycle Repairman's picture

With great hair comes great responsibility.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 02:19 | 2770732 A Nanny Moose
A Nanny Moose's picture

We gotta get rid of that old busted shit somehow. What we need is the new hotness.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ha-uagjJQ9k

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 06:31 | 2770859 Snidley Whipsnae
Snidley Whipsnae's picture

Dr E ...

It never ceases to amaze me that many (not you) continue to declare that FDR 'saved' capitalism by the many social programs that he instituted.

FDR did not save capitalism... FDR did introduced socialist measures that saved TPTB from a general uprising of the US population that would have swept away TPTB and might have led to totalitarianism, anarchy, or who knows what.

FDR introduced a socialist safety net to save the US SYSTEM (however you would label it) while TPTB were ploting to assisinate FDR. What irony!

Point being... TPTB often do not recognize what is in their own best interests. This fact should be evident to all by now.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 06:48 | 2770871 Dr. Engali
Dr. Engali's picture

Agreed .He was a parasite and played a big role in it's downfall by laying the ground work with his many social programs.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 07:38 | 2770926 Nothing To See Here
Nothing To See Here's picture

FDR was a fascist and had high praise for both Mussolini and Hitler before WW2. This can be verified, only erased from history classes by liberals.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 07:46 | 2770935 Ghordius
Ghordius's picture

btw, Churchill had also high praise for both Mussolini and Hitler before WW2. Hell, those guys were loved by nearly everybody that was not communist AND they had nice peace treaties with the SU. And the way they bashed markets, reigned in "speculation", subjugated the bankers of their age, subjected capitalistic cronycreatures to the national goals as much as the labour side, etc,

At that time, fascism was seen by many as the perfect counter to unbridled capitalism and communism. Just to remind everybody that fascism is historically a reaction to problems with crony capitalism.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 08:11 | 2770973 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

FDR did introduced socialist measures that saved TPTB from a general uprising of the US population that would have swept away TPTB

_______________________

Really? Is there hints at this general uprising of the US American population?

The US American population was much more busy running pogroms against Chinese, latinos and negroes during that period than thinking about a general uprising that could have swept TPTB...

Welcome to another episode of the US fabled past as brought to you by 'Americans'.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 00:21 | 2770579 SilverDoctors
SilverDoctors's picture

Ned Naylor-Leyland argued this week that rather than a fixed gold standard, the system that will replace the current fiat mess the world finds itself in will see gold freely float against a basket of goods and currencies.
http://www.silverdoctors.com/ned-naylor-leyland-idea-of-return-to-gold-s...

While a gold standard would obviously be better than what we have now...we really need a retun to bi-metallic gold AND SILVER as free floating currencies. 

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 00:25 | 2770583 prains
prains's picture

on the premise that china and a couple of other countries (russia) don't distort the market, good ruck

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 00:44 | 2770614 Renewable Life
Renewable Life's picture

Absolutely!!!

The gold standard was great in the pre industrial world and kept some sense of order and stability among humans for 1000's of years, however in a post industrial planet, we need a non fiat currency, that embraces the value of a basket of metals and energy resources!

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 04:12 | 2770764 cranky-old-geezer
cranky-old-geezer's picture

 

 

The problem with a gold standard is the word "standard".

No government in this modern world can be trusted to tie a paper currency to any standard and be honest about it. 

A paper currency system run by a government is going to be abused to the government's benefit at some point, which means more currency is going to be created than there is "backing" for, people will eventually figure it out, and the currency starts losing value from loss of confidence in it.

So NO "standard" will work for very long, meaning no paper currency system will work for very long.

Bottom line, you have to take away the government's printing press.  The only way to do that is NO sort of paper currency system AT ALL.

Constitutional framers knew that.  It's why they said gold and silver are money in America.   They DIDN'T say paper currency "backed" by gold & silver.  They didn't want ANY sort of paper currency.  They meant gold and silver coins ONLY.

Ok, so how would a gold & silver coin only monetary system work today with bank accounts, computers, etc?

Easy.  If you have XXX dollars in your bank account you can go down to the bank at any time and withdraw that much in gold & silver coins.

If you write a check to someone and they deposit the check in their bank account, the two banks must transfer that much in gold & silver coins from vault to vault.

Yes, you could still have checks, but no paper currency, just gold & silver coins.

What about a bank making a loan to someone?   No problem as long as they have the gold & silver in their vault.

What the bank CAN'T do is loan more money than they have in their vault, which means no more fractional reserve lending.

This is the ONLY monetary system that can't be abused by the government ...and banks.

And it wouldn't be run by the government.  The framers said gold & silver (coins).  They didn't say JUST gold & silver coins issued by our government.   ANY gold & silver coins would do, issued by ANY government ...and anyone else for that matter.

And it doesn't have to be JUST gold and silver necessarily.  Copper is a relatively valuable metal.  There could be copper coins for small denominations, like copper pennies we used to have.  You could have platinum coins.  Coins made from other metals.

The SECRET of an HONEST money system is the value is IN THE MONEY, not somewhere else, not held by a bank, not held by the government.  

The value is IN THE MONEY you hold in your hand. You don't have to trust anyone's word that the money is worth X.  It's right there in your hand.

If this sounds like a glorified barter system, you're exactly right.   A true monetary system is a glorified barter system.  

Or maybe I should say a streamlined barter system.   You're exchanging a known quantity of metal with generally agreed upon value for something else you want, groceries, gas, whatever.  That's barter.

The only way to have an honest monetary system of stable value is (a) the value must be in the money itself, not somewhere else, and (b) you to take control of the monetary system away from the government, because the government cannot be trusted to run an honest monetary system.

I believe I'm the first one on ZH to point out that paper currency is not money, it's a derivative.

Yes, according to the generally accepted definition of "derivative", paper currency is a derivative.  It's a paper financial gamble on some underlying value.   That's what a derivative is, that's what paper currency is.

No, paper currency is NOT money.  It's a derivative.  Federal reserve notes (FRNs) are not money, they are derivatives.  They are paper financial gambles on some underlying value. 

Trouble is, there is NO underlying value.  FRNs aren't tied to ANYTHING, like a normal derivative is.

FRNs are naked derivatives.  Derivatives that aren't tied to any underlying value.

So no, we haven't had money in America since gold and silver certificates were taken out of circulation.  We've had naked derivatives since then.  Derivatives that aren't tied to ANYTHING of underlying value. 

Under common law giving someone a derivative does NOT pay a debt, because the derivative HAS NO GENERALLY ACCEPTED VALUE.

And guess what.  FRNs don't pay a debt either.   The law says so.  They're legal tender yes.  The law says so.  But they don't pay the debt.  The debt is still there technically speaking.

See, FRNs are derivatives, not money. 

Money pays a debt.  Derivatives don't.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 08:47 | 2771128 marathonman
marathonman's picture

Well played Geezer.  Well played.

Obama's got a drone for you too, with a kiss from Dimon and Blankfein.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 14:32 | 2772593 cranky-old-geezer
cranky-old-geezer's picture

 

 

I wouldn't be concerned about it, nothing I say here about the true nature of FRNs is gonna matter to 99.9999% of the sheeple out there.  They look like money.  They spend like money.  That's all sheeple care about.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 12:22 | 2772061 msmith9962
msmith9962's picture

I drive a fiat.  It's a proxy for a real car and also depreciates rapidly.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 03:50 | 2770805 Gavrikon
Gavrikon's picture

Step 1, eliminate all taxes (sales and capital gains) on gold and silver bullion and coins.

Step 2, make gold and silver legal moneys for the payment of taxes.

The rest should follow, with goods and services eventually being priced in FRNs and/or grams of PM.

That ought to put an end to the debate on which "money" is better.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 06:08 | 2770844 Temporalist
Temporalist's picture

I'm sure the people will be lining up with their PMs to give them to the gov. for taxes.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 00:34 | 2770585 Landotfree
Landotfree's picture

1.) there is no such thing as a free market, never has been, never will be

2.) going back to a gold standard does nothing, you can go back to a gold standard anytime you want... nothing stopping you

All the other standards were gold and silver, in the south pacific they used sea shells... so what?  They all collapsed.

Humans took their gold and silver and lent them, attaching a rate of interest... after X amount of years... the need for exponential growth can't be met, collapse... people die, rinse and repeat.  I mean all you unfunded liabilities are crying now, you haven't even collapsed yet.  Nothing you can do now to avoid the coming flood.  As long as you continue to attach interest to your medium of exchange the cycle will repeat, sorry, no easy way and no easy choice.

"The Architect: The matrix is older than you know. I prefer counting from the emergence of one integral anomaly to the emergence of the next, in which case this is the sixth version.

Neo: There are only two possible explanations: either no one told me, or no one knows."  - the matrix reloaded

 

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 06:42 | 2770866 Snidley Whipsnae
Snidley Whipsnae's picture

Landotfree...

"you can go back to a gold standard anytime you want... nothing stopping you"

This comment is disingenious on so many levels that anyone reading it probably stopped reading as soon as they came to it.

Perhaps you should do some research and find out how many obstacles exist to prevent US Citizens from "returning to a gold standard any time they wish"...

If force by the US Gov that requires all to use fiat were removed, fiat would quickly become a transaction only currency  and PMs would quickly become the store of value currency. In fact, this is in the process of happening now although it is against the wishes of TPTB.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 00:31 | 2770587 GlassSteagall
GlassSteagall's picture

What are the logical steps to a Gold Standard? Anyone want to suggest?

 

 

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 01:38 | 2770599 moonstears
moonstears's picture

Fellow Americans you have a gold standard, gold's traded at $1950 ish, silver at $49 ish, in the 1780s-1933 you went to a bank to trade for gold, you rarely "carried" it. You want the banks to have all the fuckin' gold for your "standard"??? THINK! You might go get a double eagle and hide it under the sofa, if you desired, in the 1920s or whatever. Go buy a gold eagle and hide it under the sofa , if you wish.

see: www.usmint.gov. Metal's even cheaper on the free market/ local coin shop.

Think you'll see these prices once they start monkeying with attaching fed notes in some meaningful way?? Careful! Too much debt on these current currency notes IMO.

To implement standard: I'd just add a re-value to a $50,000 bi-metal 1ozt "electrum" coin (not yet in the Constitution, amend it in at 45% Au/55% Ag), redeemable at your request at any federal reserve bank or US Mint. Voila'(It'd cost about $780 usd today to coin one, or $78 for a 10th at $5000 fv). Please notice too that there are USD denominations on bullion at above site. C'mon think outside the box, are you getting it? What if Dr. Paul is really only trying to get the FED to come off their gold, the stuff in Knox that FDR gave 'em before we all were born???? Dr PAUL LIKELY HAS MORE GOLD THAN ALL POSTING HERE. I do think he's quite a patriot, but what's his angle? Think folks! Oh, and how many have fuckin' $50K, for this coin? See how they'd do it??? By the way, the Fed says gold's still $44 or so, per ozt but the US Mint says its $50 right on a 1 oz coin. THINK about it. Too many smart minds on ZH too, think! Half these elitists believe gold is value-less, fuck 'em, hope they keep on thinking that. The other half know what you do, evidenced when you ask these very questions. Think about it !!! p.s. Shout out to President Ford in the great beyond, for  righting the wrong against his fellow Americans and allowing gold ownership, in any qty, again, in the 1970s!!!

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 00:41 | 2770606 Lucius Corneliu...
Lucius Cornelius Sulla's picture

Step 1) Get some Libertarians voted into Congress

Step 2) Repeal the legal tender laws

That's all you will have to do.  People will choose currencies backed by gold over fiat.  You just have to remove the legal barriers to do so.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 00:45 | 2770618 Landotfree
Landotfree's picture

Repeal the US legal tender laws and you have instant collapse, I figure million will go the first year, eventually probably 1-3 billion.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 04:33 | 2770815 cranky-old-geezer
cranky-old-geezer's picture

 

 

Well, maybe if you took away America's military USD "support" around the world too.

America's military is the real thing maintaining USD value these days.  Take that away and yea, USD would pretty much collapse overnight and we'd have anarchy in America by morning.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 08:13 | 2770983 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

And 'Americans' are suicidal... This is why 'Americans' residing in the US worship the military... They know where their 'american' welfare comes from...

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 03:47 | 2770806 Gavrikon
Gavrikon's picture

"Repeal the legal tender laws."

Thanks, that was the phrase I was looking for (see my comment above).

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 08:56 | 2771188 marathonman
marathonman's picture

You can always exchange bullion for goods if you find someone to trade with.  Legal tender laws aren't that big a hurdle.  Where they get you is in the taxation on 'capital gains' on converting bullion to FRN's (all because they have destroyed the value of the FRN).  Don't convert to FRN's and just trade the bullion and you haven't incurred a gain.  Easy peasey, right?

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 00:34 | 2770593 Dr. Engali
Dr. Engali's picture

While a gold standard is certainly better than we have now it would not be well recieved as most of the gold is concentrated in the hands of a few. A bi-metal currency would certainly be better in that instance .
A fiat currency that isn't supported by debt would work as long as there were restraints on its printing. Plus you wouldn't get caught up in the debt trap of the current debt backed currency.
Lincoln's greenbacks worked quite well. And to paraphrase Lincoln when he was fighting the bankers... It's preposterous to think the government can issue 30 million dollars in debt and not be able to issue 30 million dollars in currency.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 00:43 | 2770612 Lucius Corneliu...
Lucius Cornelius Sulla's picture

If you get rid of legal tender laws and allow States or private banks to issue their own currencies then the best currency will survive, whether its backed by gold, silver or clam shells.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 00:45 | 2770598 Pseudo Anonym
Pseudo Anonym's picture

wtf, is this another one of those mickey mouse PhD degrees?

The New Austrian School of Economics, Keith Weiner, A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the New Austrian School of Economics in Partial Fulfillment of  the Requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY

btw, can anyone point me to any original idea of keith's in his 'PhD' thesis?  it looks to me that it is mostly a rehash and compilation of other thinkers' work

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 00:48 | 2770628 IridiumRebel
IridiumRebel's picture

but he acknowledged his wife...........

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 01:58 | 2770731 AurorusBorealus
AurorusBorealus's picture

Have you read many PhD theses?  They are nearly all like that.  Thousands are produced each year... nearly none of them contain anything original.  All of those in the social sciences (economics included) and in the humanities do nothing but ape the arguments of some "school" or some "grand theory of everything" in pursuit of a political end that corresponds with some present-day ideology.  Facts are nothing but statistical or anecdotal illustrations, chosen only for the purpose of adding credibility to the author's preconceived political agenda.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 09:47 | 2771435 Shell Game
Shell Game's picture

Oversimiplified thinking from our future dark age.  There are damned fine dissertations and there are damned poor ones.  The good ones are created by free thinking individuals (there still are some out there..).  With guidance from a good mentor, under the harsh watch of a peer group committee, synthesis is born. 

The problem with the sciences in Amerikka, over the last 25 years, is the hyper-aversion to risk.  The little money that is portioned to science is given to fewer and fewer principal investigators on projects with predictable outcomes.  American science has all but eliminated the unquatifiable, yet crucial, quality of serendipity

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 08:15 | 2770985 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

New Austrian School of Economics

_________________________

New? What is it? Does it mean that the old school is already outdated propaganda? Shhhhhh, it never served and it is already worn out?

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 00:40 | 2770604 IridiumRebel
IridiumRebel's picture

The masters will not have it. If they were, the construct of a silver standard would be easier to do as it's value is closer to the value of where gold was when they made the dumbass decision to remove that.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 01:36 | 2770700 moonstears
moonstears's picture

Go to the www.USmint.gov site. Buy silver. Feel better. Rebel, find someone who wants silver, trade with 'em if you desire, but do NOT hope for a silver standard with Fed notes attached, it'll be un affordable then, and in banks or treasury vaults, confiscated. See my post way down.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 00:53 | 2770639 luckylongshot
luckylongshot's picture

Returning to a gold standard is not the answer for three main reasons. Firstly it means a restircted money supply that responds to increases in productivity with deflation and depression. Secondly it causes gold to flow to stronger economies and so will not solve the problems weaker economies are facing today. Finally it leaves the banksters completely in charge as it is the tool they invented to oppress the general public prior to it being dropped. Compound interest means all the gold ends up being owned by the banksters.

What is the answer is removing the banksters rights to issue money and using Government issued money whose issuance is linked to productivity. This type of fiat currency has worked spectacularly well over long periods in history. In the middle ages the tally system operated for 500 years and never failed. It worked so well that there were no depressions, no poverty as we know it today and at times the average laborer only needed to work 14 weeks per year. The key is getting rid of the banksters and returning the right to issue money to the people, to whom it rightly belongs.

In recent history both America and Germany were able to transform their economies from bankruptcy to super powers in just 4 years by using government issued money and today the key to Chinas success is that it owns its central bank and so the government is able to issue its own money While this is the answer expect trouble from the bankster parasites who will not give up their stranglehold without a fight.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 01:05 | 2770647 Landotfree
Landotfree's picture

All the systems have failed.  Every single one of them.  The Roman empire used silver, then the silver mines could not met the exponential rate need to sustain the system, system collapse.  Population of Rome went to around 50,000.   

I can issue fiat anytime I want by extending credit, sorry there is nothing you can do to stop it.  I lend my 1 gold oz. out at a 10% annual rate of return.   Eventually everyone is doing this, then you build the ponzi schemes on top of the ponzi scheme.... fast forward 60-80+/- years, eventually exponential growth can't be met on either the demand or supply side... whammo, back to collapse and death we go.

I don't care what people use as their medium of exchange... doesn't matter... as soon as humans attach a rate of interest to their medium of exchange... the lemmings start their march to their doom.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 06:47 | 2770874 Poor Grogman
Poor Grogman's picture

Rule 1 no fractional reserve banking?.
Rule 2 no interest charged?

In the early days of the us system the banks could be called upon for their in specie deposits, by depositors. Thus they had to have the money (gold) on hand this would both limit their ability to expand lending beyond a safe level and also would mean that they had to actually match, depositors with lenders and cash on hand to call deposits?

Of course after the advent of central banking, the banks did not have to be quite as concerned about those annoying issues as they were now backed by " a lender of last resort"

Is this the answer? To go back to free banking and throw out the legal tender Laws, Central banks, regulators and every other part of our "modern system" except the small banks that can sink or swim on their
own?

I think it would be a huge improvement personally, but how would you stop such a free banking system being corrupted into the gigantic all consuming ponzi scheme that all such systems eventually become?

Is there a way? Or must we limit our enjoyment of true freedom tom the brief interludes that exist after each new iteration of such a ponzi scheme collapses.

The other question is, how similar to free banking is the sharia system of banking? Is this where the real argument In fact actually is??????

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 01:25 | 2770688 plata pura
plata pura's picture

legions of learned economists somehow cant figure out that protectionism be the answer in these states uniteds problems. furthermore you libertarians want utopia of thy ideology then have a sit in yemen. in conclusion use gold as you wish but the precious has a magical role for the future of the human.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 03:14 | 2770786 Hobbleknee
Hobbleknee's picture

We don't need a rigged "gold standard".  We need a truely free market, where it's up to consenting parties to determine their own medium of exchange.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 04:37 | 2770814 Radical Marijuana
Radical Marijuana's picture

Another article in an alternate reality, where fairy tales prevail!

The essential problem is what I call the paradox of enforcement. In order for there to be any "rule of law" there has to be enforcers. However, in order to enforce that law, those enforcers must be capable of being more deceitful and destructive than the people they enforce the law against. All of the theories about what we should do fall before that paradox of enforcement!

THERE IS NO SOLUTION TO THE PLATONIC PARADOX OF WHO WILL GUARD THE GUARDIANS! Only natural selection is the back up system, that commensurates the incommesurables, as human beings muddle through their madness, of attempting to understand their world, without the slightest understanding of understanding itself!

People who day dream about a gold standard, and similar goofy bla, blah, like their little perfect jewel of isolated logic.  However, that has nothing to do with history, which is a dynamic equilibrium of lies and robbery.

Anyway, I repeat my song and dance routine mantra:

Money is backed by murder. It always was, and it always must be.  It is ridiculous to talk about the gold standard, and the free market, yada yada!

The paradoxical truth standard in money has to face that paradox of enforcement. Real human societies always operate according to the principles and methods of organized crime.  Governments are simply the self-actualizing and self-justifying best organized gangs of criminals. Governments can never be anything else. Any other suggestions are merely day dreams, deliberately ignoring the de facto.

If we want a scientific understanding of money, then we must begin with the idea of subtraction, which extrapolates to the idea of robbery. Then our political science is consistent with physics and biology. Then our conception of money can be reconciled with reality. Then the operation of markets can be understood as dynamic equilibria of the different systems of organized lies, operating organized robberies.

Impossible ideals make the opposite happen in the real world. The people who promote impossible ideals are either professional liars and immaculate hypocrites, who already know that those will backfire and actually cause the opposite to happen in the real world, or they are reactionary revolutionaries, who like to day dream, regardless of reality.

Overall, that is why the money system we actually have is so dismal, indeed, dismal squared or dismal cubed, depending on how much ecology you add to your economics theories. The world is run by the established elites, who are the best at lying about what they are doing, and therefore, accomplishing the opposite of what they are saying. They appear to be resisted by the reactionary revolutionaries, who spout the same old bullshit ideals, and therefore, accomplish practically nothing in the way of really rebalancing the dynamic equilibria of real social robberies, since they are a controlled opposition that promotes the same bullshit impossible ideals as the elites do.

Reality is always a dynamic equilibrium of organized lies and robbery. Money and the markets are facets of those processes.

This article was written to represent the impossible ideals of another gang of goofballs, which is guaranteed to continue to backfire and accomplish practically nothing. It only supports the elites to continue to bullshit and spout their impossible ideals, in order to continue to accomplish in the real world the opposite of everything they say!

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 04:41 | 2770818 AUD
AUD's picture

This dissertation might have some valid points but will gather dust on the bookshelf like many others. No rational economic actor could afford to spend the time it takes to read it.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 04:49 | 2770819 falak pema
falak pema's picture

All this theoretical debating around a false pseudo-scientific paradigm : enconomia and free markets is secondary to civilization's primary values and the foundations of our community living.

Whatever the level of material progress; whatever the means of production, distribution and consumption the underlying principles of society remain : do we have the mechanisms to live as a community at peace amongst ourselves, with applicable law amongst us to defend our core values : life, liberty and justice; all these being conditioned to collective survival from exogenous and endogenous threats, defined by the honest, freeminded lawmaker elected in republican institutions?  

Social balance and material and intellectual/moral progress the yardstick  of the collecitve dynamics. No impediments to social upgrading of the individual freely earned from his own prowess, until they hit a position of dominance which becomes dangerous to the community and is PROSCRIBED BY THE LAW, to maintain the vital balance; aka regulation against crony oligarchy manipulation to protect status quo and dominant positions. 

Such a community will intercourse with similar or different communities outside the construct and the "golden rule" applies. 

If such a balance of internal and external fundamental values exists, the debate of individual freedoms, economic methods of value creation on a sustainable basis can occur. Both within and without the community.

The USA is the dominant community today in political, economic and military dimensions. And it has totally lost its compass, in terms of ethical and societal values. 

The rest is secondary. For the USA to survive as beacon, it must refind that compass, and it must accept to share power and excellence with other communities. It cannot be an island unto itself, nor a nation of "greed is good" for the "happy few" whatever the consequence this entails for the world community. 

That is the road to deperdition. Big time! And we are on it currently; big time!

 

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 06:18 | 2770849 Anasteus
Anasteus's picture

Nice idea, but it doesn't fit up well with incentives of the ruling oligarchy. A trip to perdition will most likely be necessary for the masses to realize and accept the basic principles. At the moment the status quo suits both lords and villeins. Lords are profiting heavily and villeins are happy with their bread and circuses. Ethical and societal values are a tough stuff to grasp, they require much more extended level of adulthood than seen nowadays.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 06:28 | 2770856 falak pema
falak pema's picture

what's new under the sun?

Sisyphus...is forever climbing and tumbling down.

But...Oligarchs dig their own grave, all the while throwing a lot of innocents into the pit; always, its called hubris/

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 06:48 | 2770875 WaEver
WaEver's picture

What's all this fascinantion for a shiny rock that end up being stored in vaults. Even cow dung is more productive.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 07:26 | 2770913 Nothing To See Here
Nothing To See Here's picture

You stack cow dung, ill stack the shiny rock. See you in 5 years .

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 07:27 | 2770912 Cunnial
Cunnial's picture

Hi all, perahps I'm missing the point? Came across an interesting article that got me thinking about this return to the gold standard: Physical Gold production has to run in excess of global growth forecast to maintain the fair value. Fiat exists to facilitate International and National Trade Transactions. Thus assuming the global economy grows at around 6% where as the supply of gold only grew 3% last yea? Therefore there is simply not enough known gold in the world to mine that will ever keep up with global growth (at current rates). So in effect you are condoning the end of global trade? All you will end up doing is returning to domestic demand, foregoing globalistation and enter a deflationary spiral? 

 

At the end of the this forum so may repost this later when more gold standard chat comes along!

 

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 07:31 | 2770921 Nothing To See Here
Nothing To See Here's picture

Stop with the stupidity. This would only mean that an oz of gold could buy more stuff. Gold's value doesnt change, its everything else's value that changes according to productivity, economic conditions, etc.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 08:07 | 2770962 Cunnial
Cunnial's picture

Easy champ, why don't you come on down from high chair and read/answer the question instead of getting derogartory. My point simply if you fix a fiat to the Gold standard in oder maintain it's value, demand will outstrip supply. If simple demand and supply mecahnics are assumed (unless you have another another more effective economic treatise) why would you return to the gold standard and fix the value of gold to a currency? It's impossible. Gold standards in the 19th & 20th centrury did'nt last very long. It buckled uneder international conflict, furthermore gold discoveries were on the rise so the supply was assumed to be constant. 

Transactions require fiat so you don't have to swap gold bars. Whatever fiat has become is not what is not the discussion. Its trying to maintain and facilitate global nominal growth.

My view on gold is like everyone else, PM is the only way forward, but this talk of gold standard is perplexing? 

Finally, what is golds value? 

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 08:13 | 2770980 AU5K
AU5K's picture

Golds value is determined by supply and demand.  Like everything else.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 09:56 | 2771474 Shell Game
Shell Game's picture

Agreed.  ..but especially demand.  Gold is relatively rare, thus its supply will always be relatively constrained.  Only gold can cover all global debt (demand), and it must cover this global debt in the coming gold standard.  Like a gas, gold will expand to whatever size container (debt) holds it.  Greater debt, greater the concentration of value held in gold. As debt is reconciled, the concentration of value held by gold will contract.  It's the perfect medium for storing value.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 07:46 | 2770932 WaEver
WaEver's picture

funny how you don't see you're being manipulated into buying just another speculative asset. Hopefully uncle sam won't come around and confiscate like he did in the past. btw just read when money dies by A fergusson and discover what is really helpful in case of hyperinflation. Good luck on eating your coins

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 08:37 | 2771063 Clint Liquor
Clint Liquor's picture

 

Good luck on eating your coins

I farm, raise livestock, smoke and cure meat. I'll will be happy to trade Gold and Silver for my products right now. In a currency crisis, it's all that I and other farmers will trade for. Good luck eating your fiat.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 11:35 | 2771867 moonstears
moonstears's picture

Ideal if one can do it, Clint. Not so much for a city guy, or a guy with $2000 cushion. I'd direct him to silver.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 11:38 | 2771844 moonstears
moonstears's picture

actually WaEver, it's A FORM of wealth preservation and takes little room, is private, and did quite well in Weimar. If one neighbor saved 1000 paper marks then and the other saved 200 marks in silver 10 mark coins, who did better????(ps note these were nice savings figures for middle class at the beginning of that period)

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 08:18 | 2770988 chances
chances's picture

if we go back to the gold standard, the bankers win again, all they would do is convert their bonds to gold and ride off into the sunset! silly article, bankers promote returning to the GS so they can rob all the gold!!!!

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 08:51 | 2771154 WaEver
WaEver's picture

Gold and silver trade freely so what stops you from converting all your holdings ?

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 09:38 | 2771402 chaartist
chaartist's picture

first, there will be war. 

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 12:26 | 2772072 Random_Robert
Random_Robert's picture

Dear Uncle Sam-

 

What was so wrong with the Constitution, anyway...?

 

Signed-

A disenfranchised corporate citizen.

Fri, 09/07/2012 - 12:47 | 2772131 dadichris
dadichris's picture

IMO gold standard is not the answer because it is too susceptible to manipulation of the economy through hoarding etc.  Instead we must replace the debt based monetary system with a sustainable system and switch to full reserve banking - then it doesn't matter what currency is used because it cannot be debased by governments or banks.

Wed, 09/12/2012 - 17:34 | 2787533 Random_Robert
Random_Robert's picture

That's a dumb reason.

 

 

When money is scarce (due to hoarding, AKA "saving"), then general price levels drop until either:

 

1) the productive get to work mining, refining, and minting.

or

2) The trend turns to dis-hoarding.

 

 

People only hoard when they lose faith in their government.

the shitty thing is that governments have learned that they can work AROUND this lack of faith by replacing real money with a debaseable currency instead.

 

 

And thus, the cycle becomes:

 

1) Declining faith in governement

2) increased hoarding

3) increased debasement by governement (to de-value the hoarded money)

4)  Even more faith in governement lost

5) Even more debasement

6) Currency collapse.

 

Yeah- that is WAY better than a Gold Standard, isn't it...?

 

FAIL.

Thu, 09/13/2012 - 09:45 | 2789216 MeelionDollerBogus
MeelionDollerBogus's picture

There's no such thing as "hoarding" only "saving"

Saving is actually good for the economy. The more saving there is the more strength the economy will have.

A full-reserve system unable to be debased IS a gold-based system. Water, fuel, electricity, tools, digital currency, all can be debased, adultered more easily than pure gold coins or durable 22k gold coins.

By definition if you want a full-reserve system it CAN'T be anything but gold coin

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!