This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Guest Post: How To Avoid Voting For A Globalist Puppet
Submitted by Brandon Smith of Alt-Market
How To Avoid Voting For A Globalist Puppet
Only a few days ago I attended a community meeting here in the Flathead Valley of Montana which revolved around the first of a series of gubernatorial debates covered by webcast across the state. The number of Republican candidates vying in the primaries of this election is a bit absurd, and after witnessing the half-hearted or outright fake performances by most of them, I can see quite clearly that the state of Montana is being targeted by Neo-Con interests posing as Constitutionalists in an attempt to neutralize the extraordinary advance of the Liberty Movement here. What struck me most sharply was the fact that almost every candidate vying for the governor’s slot had taken on elements of the Liberty Movement philosophy. The elections of 2012 and the immense success of the Ron Paul campaign have so far proven without a doubt that the anti-globalist, anti-totalitarian, anti-collectivist stance is now part of a growing majority in America. Just as we have forced Neo-Con candidates in the Presidential primaries to at least pretend that they care about freedom (quite a change from the Bush years), so too are Republican impostors forced to mimic us in the battle for state offices.
With so many political candidates now at the very least paying lip-service to the concepts of Constitutional freedoms, limited Federal influence, and State’s rights, it may become increasingly difficult for voters to discern who is a snake-oil peddler and who is the real deal. Many who supported the rise of the Tea Party (originally launched by Ron Paul back in 2007-2008), suddenly found their efforts for a free America being hijacked by establishment fakes in 2010. Out of nowhere, gutter dwelling pro-globalist imposters like Rick Santorum could be found headlining forums at Constitutional rallies, and even veteran globalists like Newt Gingrich have tried to jump on the bandwagon.
The light at the end of the tunnel, though, is ironically visible in the destructive nature of these candidates.
The NDAA, despite the inherent horror of its provisions, has been a spectacular litmus test for traitorous politicians. Self-styled liberty candidates like Allen West of Florida, winning with Tea Party support, have been exposed because of theirr backing of the NDAA. Shockingly, West not only voted for the NDAA, but helped to COMPOSE the bill! Now, due to a growing public outcry over the rendition and indefinite detention provisions of the NDAA, legislators like West are scrambling to cover their own asses by knowingly misinterpreting the bill’s language and denying it applies to American citizens:
Three amendments to the NDAA were put forward by senators Udall, Paul, and Feinstein, specifically designed to ensure that American citizens would be protected from the draconian detainment provisions of the NDAA, and all three were struck down. Yet, Allen West and others continue to perpetuate the lie that Americans are safe from such tyranny.
Exposure after the fact is better than nothing, but these difficult days require more vigilance. How can the people of this country avoid making the mistake of voting for such disingenuous candidates when they seem so adept at telling us what we want to hear until they are comfortably in office?
The key is to stop listening to what they SAY, and start looking closely at what they DO. We must ignore their rhetoric, their speeches written by proxy, and their bad jokes slapped together by hired staff, and begin examining their actions and their backgrounds. Because the Liberty Movement has gained so much influence and so much voice over the past four years, it is time that we start setting some ground rules for political candidates we will accept, and those we will not accept, to represent us.
We need to ask ourselves, and them, some very pointed questions. How have they consistently voted in the past? Are they truly protecting our rights as Americans and as a human beings as described in the Constitution and the Bill Of Rights? Have they done anything to stall or dismantle corruption in the government and in the banking industry? Or, have every one of their propositions and “solutions” involved the continuation of destabilizing policies designed to aid an elite few at the expense of average Americans? The following is a list of warning signs that can help you, your family, and your friends, no matter what their party affiliation, in determining if a favorite politician is a legitimate statesman, or a puppet bought and paid for by global corporate interests…
1) Have They Ever Promised To Investigate, Audit, Or Dissolve The Private Federal Reserve Bank?
The Federal Reserve is the primary culprit in the creation of the derivatives and credit bubble. Its use of artificially low interest rates inflated the housing market and by extension the U.S. economy, energizing international banking fraud and producing perhaps the greatest financial black hole in history. It is currently staving off the effects of this collapse through the constant printing of fiat money from thin air, setting up the U.S. for a currency implosion of epic proportions.
If your candidate has never made more than a passing sound bite comment on the Federal Reserve and what they plan to do about the poisonous debt and dollar devaluation that the private central bank has generated, then it is likely they are either too ignorant to understand how the institution operates, or, they know full well the problem, and plan to do nothing about it. Ask directly any politician you plan to vote for; will they promise to fully audit and or shut down the Federal Reserve, especially if foul play or corruption is discovered? If they defend the Fed, or dance around the question, then they are not on your side, nor on the side of true free markets and a stable economy.
2) Did They Vote For The Banker Bailouts? Do They Continue To Defend Them?
If a candidate or representative voted for or openly supports the continuance of bailout measures for international banks which taxpayers must eventually cover, then this politician is not for you. The bailouts have accomplished nothing that was promised by the Bush Administration, the Obama Administration, or state representatives who gave a platform for their passage. Credit markets have not been unfrozen, the housing market has not stopped its endless decline, and consumer activity has not returned to levels anywhere near those of 2006. Nearly 80% of Americans on both sides of our twisted two party spectrum voiced opposition to the bailouts and have continued to fight against quantitative easing measures on the part of the Federal Reserve. This is not a case of our government knowing better for us than we do for ourselves. This is a case of the government ignoring the will of the people and serving the interests of select elites. If you plan to support a man or woman running for elected office, make absolutely sure they are not proponents of further bailouts and inflationary printing for the sake of propping up big banks, foreign institutions, and the highly manipulated stock market.
3) Do They Support The Domestic Spying Measures Of The FISA Act And The Dissolution Of The 4th Amendment?
Any politician who has the audacity to argue that you must sacrifice your privacy and your liberty for “safety” is not on your side, or the side of the Constitution. The 4th Amendment strictly prohibits illegal search and seizure of a citizen’s property without a warrant and without probable cause, and this includes your personal information and communications. However, over time, the protections of the 4th Amendment have been slowly eroded away. Today, almost every aspect of our lives is an open book for the government to peruse at their slightest convenience.
With the advent of new measures executed through the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, no electronic transfer of data is safe, and corporate entities which handle these communications are completely immune from civil suits involved in the release of private information. Under FISA, and under any act which authorizes mass surveillance of the public, every citizen is treated as guilty until proven innocent. This is not Constitutional. If your candidate has his hands into FISA or other pieces of legislation that open the door to domestic spying, drop them like a bad habit, or find yourself in deep regret later down the road.
4) Do They Support The NDAA, SOPA, PIPA, The AUMF, The Expatriation Act, Etc.?
The fascinating thing about the response by legislators to the fury over the NDAA is that they now refuse to acknowledge that the bill actually pertains to American citizens. This tells me they are afraid to confront those opposed to the bill on the grounds that indefinite detention and suspension of Habeas Corpus is necessary. Arguments from men like Allen West (or Denny Rehberg here in Montana) revolve around one line in the bill from Sec. 1022 which they use completely out of context:
1) UNITED STATES CITIZENS- The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States.
What they consistently refuse to explain is the word “requirement” in this line. If they were to place the line in the context of all the provisions involving indefinite detainment, the word “requirement” pertains to foreign prisoners that fall under the definition of “covered persons” in Sec. 1021 (a covered person could essentially be anyone the government decides to accuse of being a terrorist). So, to put this as simply as possible; the government and the U.S. military is “required” under the NDAA to indefinitely detain without jury trial those foreign prisoners designated as enemy combatants or terrorists. The government is NOT required to indefinitely detain U.S. citizens under the NDAA, but THEY CAN IF THEY WANT TO! This precedent was set by the passage of the Authorization For The Use Of Military Force (AUMF), and was further strengthened (not obstructed as some propagandists claim) by the Supreme Court’s decision in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld. The NDAA gives the highly unconstitutional practice the Congressional stamp of approval.
With the NDAA, Americans must adopt a scorched earth policy before it is too late. Every single sitting legislator that supports this bill must be removed from office. Every political candidate running this year who proclaims support for the NDAA should be avoided like a plague ridden corpse. SOPA, PIPA, the Expatriation Act, and other pieces of legislation operate on the same principle as the NDAA; they create a grey area within the law that allows government to accuse any person of a crime without evidence and inflict punishment without due process. If we allow political vampires who nurture these measures into seats of power, then America ceases to be. Without our liberties and the means to protect them, our country becomes nothing more than a doomed land mass devoid of principles or honor.
5) Do They Have Overt Ties To The Military Industrial Complex?
The last thing this nation needs is another ‘chicken hawk’ candidate thirsty for war in far off lands as long as he doesn’t ever have to do any of the actual fighting. However, what we need even less are candidates who have made their livings and their careers dispensing war for quick cash. In Montana, it is disconcerting to be confronted with the likes of Neil Livingstone, who gave audiences a brief chuckle when he claimed that he would like to reintroduce the gray wolf to Washington D.C. instead of Montana to see how they liked it. Very funny, but if the audience really knew Livingstone’s history, they wouldn’t be laughing.
Livingstone’s background in private mercenary warfare and Blackwater-like businesses leaves a bad smell in the air, not to mention his attempt to lobby for Gaddafi and make a buck or two (or ten million) off the NATO debacle unleashed in Libya:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2063465/Revealed-How-US-mercenaries-offered-Gaddafi-10m-deal-flee-Libya.html
All that aside though, this “terrorism expert” suddenly decides to move back to Montana just last year, taking a break from his lucrative war driven wheeling and dealing, to enter the race for governor? Should I not be at least a little suspicious? In the meantime, his running mate, Ryan Zinke, a former Navy SEAL whose unit purportedly went on to “kill Bin Laden”, is now visiting Montana election meet-ups dressed in the most insincere cowboy costume I have ever laid eyes on complete with ten-gallon hat and giant gold belt buckle with “Montana” etched in bold letters, as if to say “hey ya’ll, I’m just like you!” At the end of the meeting I attended, Zinke suggested that Montana solve its employment issues with “predator drone factories” (of course). As he left, he actually exclaimed “go predator drones!”
Bottom line, whether you are dealing with presidential candidates, or state candidates, a record of getting into bed (and into business) with the military industrial complex is probably not a good sign that the representative will respect civilian rights or the Constitution. Certainly, he will say that he loves liberty, but by being instrumental in the spread of globalism, he has proven otherwise, and is not to be trusted.
6) Does It Feel Like They Are Just Telling You What You Want To Hear?
Every candidate at the first gubernatorial debates in Montana was quick to use the words “states rights”, at least when it came to the EPA and resource development. Livingstone even served up a vague threat of arresting federal representatives who cross into Montana (which, oddly, doesn’t seem to have the same bite after learning his background). However, only one candidate, Bob Fanning (and running mate Chuck Baldwin) was willing to put himself on the line, promising to nullify federal incursions into Montana, protect medical marijuana, build a state sponsored militia (as the Constitution demands), deny the socialist doctrines of Obamacare, and insulate Montana’s economy using decentralized methods and legitimate free markets.
The difference between Fanning and the other candidates was evident after hearing his goals and solutions. They’re plans were broad, and dubious. His were direct and decisively outlined. They’re stances against Federal encroachment felt hollow, or deceitful, while Fanning’s resolve was absolute. Sometimes, intuition is as good a measure of a candidate as factual research. If your gut is telling you the man in front of you is a fake, it may be wise to ponder the thought for a moment.
7) Where Are They Getting Their Money From?
In the 2012 presidential elections, only one candidate is raising the majority of his funds from average citizens instead of corporate backers. Only one candidate has received a majority support from active serving military. Only one candidate has done all of this through grassroots methods, despite being relentlessly attacked or ignored by the mainstream media. Of course, I’m talking about Ron Paul.
If global banking interests are pumping their donations into a particular candidate’s campaign, that candidate should be automatically categorized as unelectable. Sadly, this is not how our world works right now. “Follow the money” should be the first rule of the American voter. If Mitt Romney, for instance, is being backed by the exact same corporate financiers as Barack Obama, then one should be led to question whether or not there is absolutely any difference between them. Apparently, global banks don’t seem to think so, so why should you?
If elitists refuse to spend a single penny on a specific candidate, then it is a sure bet that candidate is a threat to the status quo, and therefore, should be on the top of your list as a potential representative.
In the end, it will be difficult if not impossible to change this country in the midst of the current political climate. This means that the climate must evolve or be done away with completely. I believe 2012 may be our last chance to establish a governmental environment conducive to freedom. If we fail to educate ourselves and others on the warning signs listed above, then political options will disappear. We will be left with no other choice but a violent and prolonged conflict with those who would demolish American Constitutionalism. Perhaps this is inevitable regardless of election results, but the fact remains that we must try every other available avenue first.
I have never been a fan of politics, but I know that this is only because the system now in place is constructed to discourage me, and everyone else, from trying to make a difference. Playing by the rules of the establishment system is useless, but there are other roads we might take. We can, indeed, make our own rules, and start a new game on more even ground, as long as we find the right candidates, cast off agents of distraction, and at the very least, attack the issues at a local level with every ounce of strength we have. Putting a Constitutional candidate like Ron Paul into the Oval Office, though excitingly possible, will not be enough. We must also pursue the same standards in our states, and draw a line in the sand around our respective communities.
Even with rigged electronic voting, media manipulation, and political co-option, I feel our efforts this year will resonate for many decades to come. Whether we are able to take back social power for regular citizens is not as important as making them aware that they have allowed themselves to lose that power in the first place. The elections of 2012, ultimately, should be treated as a vehicle for enlightenment, and this enlightenment begins when we are able to recognize the lies we live, and the men who sell them to us…
»
- 26679 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
"Of course, I’m talking about Ron Paul."
Finally... I was beginning to wonder: who is this guy talking about?
Ron Paul is the only hope this place has left. Check out corporate raider/ job destroyer Romney's Bain Capital in the video at this link. It's long but you can skip through it and get the jist of it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLWnB9FGmWE
Based on his poll numbers in SC, I don't think this place has any hope left. And I've donated $$$ to his campaign already.
Don't quit now just because your horse isn't in the lead. The more delegates Ron Paul gets the stronger his influence. Donate again.
I just did yesterday.
RP's ideas are winning but we might still be a presidential cycle away from a Taft republican getting the nomination. Rasmussen showed 47% of americans supporting the withdrawl of all troops from Europe in a poll yesterday. Other republican candidates are starting to talk about the Fed and the constitution. Never would have happened five years ago. More votes means more delegates and more influence at the convention. Might turn out to be Rand in 2016, not Doc in 2012, but the failed economic policies and overseas adventures won't get better without radical change.
By 2016 Rand Paul will be as co-opted and corrupted as the rest of them. He's already getting cozy with Zion. The Republic died long ago, and Ron Paul can't save it. Invest in lead.
Don't get me wrong, I think the best possible outcome is him or one of his supporters issuing a call to arms against the Fed Gov. though.
Edit: With the internet and radio making communication so easy, I think a 3% turnout in favor of Ron Paul would make this outcome pretty likely, so that's my minimum expectation for him at the polls.
In 2008, I was elected as a Nevada state delegate. We (Ron Paul) delegates were by-passed because the Republican party wanted to hand pick their national delegates. The WHOLE system is rigged!!!!!!
The "fix" is in. Only revolution will do.
It's too late. The media and political machines have crushed him. Besides, I'm sure if he was ever elected, the powers that be would crash the economy in a hard landing just so they could blame him. The root of the problem is the global banking cartel from London and Wall Street
It's not too late. You will rarely, if ever, meet a 'former Ron Paul Supporter.'
Look at Ron Paul's 2008 votes compared to 2012:
IA: 2008 - 11.817... 2012 - 26,036 that's 2.2 times as many.
NH: 2008 - 18,346... 2012 - 56,872 that's x 3.1
SC: 2008 - 16,155... 2012 - 77,500 that's x 4.8
Steady growth that's not going away.
Ron Paul will not be a candidate in the general election.
Generally speaking, no one ever votes FOR anyone. You always vote AGAINST someone.
That someone this November will be Obama. Whoever the GOP nominee is, that is the anti Obama and that's that.
Centuries of people have looked for a third way, but in the world as it is, there is none. You can vote for or against Obama. If you want to vote against him, that means punching a GOP chad. Any other chad helps Obama.
LOL! Right, so vote for more Obama, just like Obama was four more years of Bush. Sorry, integrity still means something to me, and that it what it really comes down to. You encourage people to remain morally bankrupt as a "solution" to being morally bankrupt. Wake up! There is only ONE party now. If enough votes are gathered behind Paul, then we actually get a shot at a second party. A better future requires sacrafice now, stop being such a pussy for a change.
+1
That's not how it works.
If you want to see a 3rd or 4th party, you start at the state legislator level. You Build The Party.
You do not manufacture fame by running for President, get excluded from the debates, and drain votes from whoever. That does not build a party. That just burns donations pointlessly.
If you want a third party, fund grassroots party building activity and don't plan to have a presidential candidate for 20 years, because you won't. All you'll do is get the least desirable option elected.
You want a party? Build the party. Develop candidates at state legislature level, then a Congressional seat or two, then a Senator and Governor or two, AND THEN AND ONLY THEN RUN ONE OF THEM FOR PREZ.
Until then all you can do is try to obstruct the least desirable option.
So vote against DC: grab a gas can on election day. Fill it up and drive to the nearest K-street law firm.
Lighters for Liberty!!!
...or every person like you could push the RIGHT chad and not just the chad that gives you a tickle in the "safety nipple". Stop whoring this idea that people who vote Ron Paul are giving away the win to Obama.. how about you fucking nuggets vote who's the right person instead of who you "think can beat Obama". Ron can beat him if you vote for him!!
Your way of thinking is why your reasoning of "You vote against someone" is so fucking stupid it makes my eyes bleed. Vengeance voting is destroying this country!!!!!
Statements like yours make me WANT to see a civil war just so we can finally put an end to this 3 way reach around. The faction that wins, wins and they can reap what they sow.
SO sick and tired of you're fucking type..
Romney, Obama and Gingrich, all three of them are sociopaths that have been hand-picked by the media and other elite sociopaths.
You want to choose the least evil among them? Why?!?
Knowing this, voting for any one of them makes you a defeated sheep who accepts to be led to the slaughter... or worse yet, an idiot and/or sociopath!
Stand up for yourself!! You're supposed to be a human being that deserves better than these corrupt douche-bad sociopaths!!!
Knowing what you know, how could you not vote for Ron Paul?!?
You're wrong. And if Jesse Ventura wasn't disgusted with politics he would have won a second term in MN. Now, of course, they've made it even more difficult for a third party to operate in MN, but the point is that if given even a remotely credible non-establishment candidate that resonates with the people, the people will pick that candidate.
I'm wondering if RP does go third party (he hasn't ruled it out this time) and gets the signatures to be on the ballots in all states (shouldn't be an issue) if they will allow him to become president, or if they will just shoot him before he gets a chance to win? The mans politics would bring many powerful enemies out of the woodwork, you can identify them as groups that survive on the taxpayers money. MIC, Israel Lobby, (just to name the top two) the list of dangerous foes is very long.
They can screw him without shooting him, but the outcry would be horrendous.
How? Easy. The electoral college.. They can elect whoever they want. So far they have always elected the popular vote winner (I think) but they can vote for whomever they see fit.
A few mil spread around, and they will be voting for the PTB's candidate.
plan a write in ron paul. plan b every family member has passport cash ounce of gold. plan c. ar m1a stored food etc. the outcome of plans a thru c are doubtfull.
Seriously you need to figure out what a comma is for and start using one. Your post was damn near impossible to decipher due to the grammar. The best thoughts can get easily lost if they aren't understood. Just my advice if you want people to take you seriously.
for those without the decoder ring:
plan A: write in ron paul.
plan B: every family member has passport cash ounce of gold.
plan C: ar15, m1a (.308), stored food etc.
...the outcome of the above plans are uknown. Your mileage may vary... significantly.
My two courses of action are.
A. Write in Ron Paul
B. Start the revolution
Ann Barnhardt says she won't play ball come tax time. Start following her site (http://barnhardt.biz) . Her address + approach instructions are on it; just don't startle her unless you're wearing kevlar. She may eventually request supporting fire. That's how the "revolution" will start. With bullets. As usual. I admire Ron Paul, but it's too late for ballots.
speaking of bankster bailouts........
http://www.housingwire.com/2012/01/23/sigtarp-treasury-approved-millions-in-salaries-to-bailed-out-bank-execs
and whats going on in egypt with failed bond auctions?
http://www.theburningplatform.com/?tag=edward-bernays
excellent review of where we have been and how we have been duped.
Tyler should post this as a story.
Great photo....
The kleptocrat and his lobbyist....
You guys really think it matters who you vote for for President? The powers that be will NEVER let Ron Paul near that office, sorry people.
I agree (SC proves this) but I will still vote for him in the Super Tuesday primary and will still become a delegate. After this, I am done trying and will withdraw my consent and start planning my FEMA camp stay.
Then its time to stop recognizing "that" office for what it aspires to be and declare it for the fraud it really is. The "will" of the people hasn't been represented there for a very long time. There are clear and simple reasons why the American economy has gone down the drain and those who are in charge made off with billions and have sent their puppets to "that" office.
Kevin Spacey (Actor), Paul Bettany (Actor), J.C. Chandor
http://www.amazon.com/Margin-Call-Kevin-Spacey/dp/B005FITIGO/ref=sr_1_2?...
It's more then a film...it's an education.
It's easy to agree with all of these points. But in the end, politicians (and wanna be politicians) are all liars and will say whatever they think will get them elected and people will just blindly believe them. As detailed here, we see signs of it now. But the problem lies in that most people cannot think for themselves. Easily more than 90%(my guess) of the US voting population will not look further than spoken words, because there are not enough critical thinkers among us. Even if you do not agree with one or more aspects of Ron Paul's platform, his record speaks for itself and only someone of his strength and beliefs can begin to turn around the ship.
They are also sheep, and will follow.
Vote from the rooftops.
That's right the elitist will never allow Ron Paul to gain strength. The Elite have their puppets, Obamma, Romney or Gingrich.
The puppet masters will let you choose a puppet.
Do you suppose that this is how the thinking people in Germany felt as Hitler came into power? Watching in disbelief as the new government passed more and more egregious power grabs. Thinking that "there is no way the German people will stand for this" and watching with stunned amazement as they at best said nothing and at worst cheered the transgressions. When they talked to their friends and neighbors about it ( those they weren't afraid to talk too) they either shrugged it off or thought they were a kook. I personally am in total amazement about what is going on and the total silence of the masses. Scares the shit out of me. Not for myself but for my wife and kids.
"Do you suppose that this is how the thinking people in Germany felt as Hitler came into power?"
Yes!
Actually, a large chunk of the "thinking" people supported Adolf. Something about his diagnosis of the Prime Culprit. Then, as now.
I am not referring to thr crony capitalists that played along with him I am talking about the every day person who pays attention.
No use in voting this trip. The mega-corps have their man in the White House right now. Do you really think Obama "caved"? Yeah, he caved allright when his handlers told him what they wanted, or no 2012 election money. We do not have a two party system. And, will not be free of all the bribes and payoffs until the people unite. All the people. As long as they can divide us, we will continue to eat shit.
Every single drudge poll shows RP in the lead one day before each primary yet 'miraculously' he hasn't won a single primary yet. This should be proof enough that results of these primaries are all hacked and fraudulent and can be changed to suit the needs of whomever is pulling the levers. It really is so simple to see what's going on when you open your eyes but people are so indoctrinated into the American 'way of truth, this could never happen here' mentality that they don't believe what's right in front of their faces. Hold ANY poll anywhere and they will all show RP consistently in the lead. You are not getting YOUR choice for President folks. You are getting THEIR choice and then allowed to vote for that. Even those results are manipulated imo. Voting is a fucking waste of time for that reason.
Someone famous once said "If voting resulted in real change, it would be made illegal" - forget who sorry.
George Carlin
Sheesh.
That would be Emma Goldman.
pods
whoa dudes, two down votes?
Anarchist Emma Goldman it IS, sorry to break it to you. She also said:
and
“No real social change has ever been brought about without a revolution - Revolution is but thought carried into action”
YES! We had a huge % of support here for RP; maybe a close 2nd or 3rd place. Yet when the backroom smoke cleared, RP had only 13%, down about 20% before the vote. About 100 dead people voted for NEWT. People said they would press RP on the voting computer and it would say they voted for Newt or Romney. They went back and re-selected RP and then got a confirmation they had indeed voted for RP.
The vote in SC was rigged BFTime.
Then we should expect some form of statement from the RP campaign. They seem awfully quiet at the moment. RP is drawing crowds. That won't go away no matter how deep the fraud. In the contrary when fraud is so blatant, it will have a cataclysmic effect and galvanize supporters even further.
Where is RP on this?
Drudge polls are INTERNET polls. Internet voters are a self-selected, unrepresentative sample of the voting mass. It's not the elections that are cooked. It's the populace.
Unfortunately, me thinks it is too late for Amerika to turn around. With one of the dumbest populations inhabiting the world; with welfare everywhere and growing; and most importantly, no real difference between the 2 parties except how they spend the graft and distribute the corruption, I can't see any light at the end of the tunnel.
http://vegasxau.blogspot.com
I know last night I took the uscis civics test to see how a compared to my fellow mericans.. Well the average score on the test for US citizens was like 49% and for college degree holders 54%.. pretty pathetic..i raced through it and got a 86%..they found the canadians do better on our naturalization test then american citizens... now we just need 4chan to make that pic up top of those pigs laughing a meme.. it was a republic and we couldnt keep it. sorry ben
If Gingrich is the ultimate “rental politician,” just who is paying the rent? Why, mostly it’s Casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, of course, net worth $23.6 billion, who’s financing Gingrich behind the scenes in a PAC called Winning Our Future. Adelson, who wants Israel to retain her occupied territories and expand Jewish settlements, is using Gingrich to finance the expansion of a country other than the United States
Gingrich has been the most outspoken supporter of increased Israeli settlements, obviously due to the man who supplies the fuel for the Gingrich campaign, making one wonder if Gingrich may be the most corrupt politician of all times.
In 2009, the Zionist Organization of America, a hard-line Zionist group that advocates expanded Jewish settlements into Palestinian territory, presented Adelson, America's 8th wealthiest individual, the Theodor Herzl Gold Medallion for outstanding achievement in Zionism.
Since 2007 Adelson has owned a daily newspaper in Israel called Israel Hayom, distributed free of charge, and the largest circulation of any newspaper in the country. It is ultra-supportive of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and has been promoting Gingrich.
“Winning Our Future is one of a new breed of campaign committees that – being technically independent of the candidate – can legally accept unlimited donations, in the wake of the US Supreme Court’s landmark Citizens United ruling, according to GlobalPost.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/11/sheldon-adelson-newt-gingrich-israel_n_1195867.html
http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/united-states/120124/wife-billionaire-sheldon-adelson-gives-5m-pro-gi
Wow, another heb with his fingers on the levers of control behind the scenes? Who woulda thunk it...
Breaking news on GlobalPost has brought the total contributions to Gingrich from the Adelsons to $10,000,000. It's a ruse that the gambling industry is controlled by the Italian mafia or that Congress and the presidency are represenatives of the people? Says GP:
Adelson is working with the casino owners in Nevada to mess with the caucus date too.
Well, you knew there had to be a zionist in there somewhere.
Newt likes it up the chocolate pipe from his Zionist Masters.
Conference Room Antics! Hundereds of times many of us have had to listen to some joker come up with an idea and then it gets backed by that jokers supporters. Then the one rational guy will talk and have the best idea you've ever heard on where to take the company. But nobody listens, because he's not the boss and not a lakey and not vieing for a higher title. He's just saying it like it is. SO the established leads ignore him and the ship goes down.
Move to a remote corner of the Pacific via sailboat is one way.
Wonder how Germany got Hitler? The US senate and congress is welcoming a future tyrant.
With the NDAA and other changes people are loosing more and more freedom.
Hitler's campaign was well "financed". By whom? Well, by those good bankers with almost anglo-saxon names on Wall Street of course. Hitler was probably told the money came from German Industrials. They of course had been financed by Wall Street all along. Hitler didn't bother looking further. Maybe he knew which makes the whole conspiracy even more blatant.
Specifically: Berlin Zionist Jew bankers financed the Nazis when the Party went bankrupt, 1928-29. Even paid rent on the Party HQ. Thereafter, ZOGbux came via Montagu Norman, Rothschild cognate at the Bank of England. And Hitler knew all. That's why, during subsequent ZOG-agent Churchill-forced European and World War and so-called "holocaust", none of the European Rothschilds got shot or shoved into a gas chamber.
Switzerland a neutral country in between a war torn Europe. That's not suspicious, right? The Nazis stored their looted gold there as did those wealthy Jews that left Europe in a hurry on their way to America. Hitler didn't dare touch Switzerland but was sipping tea a few miles away in his Teahouse and mapping out war all over Europe. Wealthy Jews were able to live in Germany pretty much unscathed. They only left when the Allies started carpet bombing Germany.
Speaking of our "friends" on Wall Street busily doing God's work and the NDAA:
Christopher Hedges said at TruthDig that the controversial bill passed “because the corporations, seeing the unrest in the streets, knowing that things are about to get much worse, worrying that the Occupy movement will expand, do not trust the police to protect them. They want to be able to call in the Army. And now they can.
I dont think a presidential candidate has pissed me off more than mitt romney. This guy will be in guiness book soon for the worlds biggest douchbag.
He has apparently learned nothing from the John Kerry campaign. People want someone who at least stands for something. Shrub was an idiot, but at least he was clear about his positions. (Wrong, maybe, but clear.)
Mittens is the phoniest guy I think I've ever heard (after Barry). His dad had ginormous brass balls (look it up), but Mittens is a chicken. He'll do whatever his corporate masters want. Just like Barry.
that pic is just to much.....i am going to have that stuck in my head all day now...and our local faux news radio station just replaced an hour of armstrong and getty with an hour of rush limbaw that piece of shit...whats this world coming too.. you call it like you see it so they replace an hour of good radio and replace it with the neocon puppet show.. Now i will be heading up to my place in the woods for a week to do some work, burn some piles, ride motos etc...... dont collapse the system without me guyz!!! wait for me.. sometimes when i head up i feel like i will be coming back to a world at war... remeber everything is just swell till it aint.. peace
Ron Paul would get a whole lot more support if he was not anti-choice. Still I will write him in. The point on the NDAA 2012 cannot be overstated. The scum-sucking pussbag Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said right on the floor of the Senate that American citizens WERE INCLUDED. Every one of the 86 senators and 290 odd house members (rouch calc) who voted for NDAA should be removed from office by whatever means.
Correct, the one thing that keeps knawing at the back of my brain is, why didn't Ron Paul show up for the NDAA vote? just wondering.
Only 7 of both houses voted against it. Friggin sad.
Ron Paul isn't against abortion per se, he's against federal funds for abortion. if you want to see a fundamentalists head explode tell them you dont' believe in Federal funds for abortion, (they applaud) and additionally you are against any use of Federal funds for state sponsored killing including executions and military expeditions beyond the defense of the United States. (they start booing)
the solution to a lot of these problems is to defund the agenciies. before W2 there was no Department of Defense, during the W2 it was called the War Department, and after W2 when our long series of foreign police actions began, we called it (oxymoronically) the DOD, when it should have been the DOO. and there was no CIA before W2. if there's no money for GITMO there's no GITMO.
Ron Paul isn't against abortion per se, he's against federal funds for abortion.
Yes he is. He's said so on many occasions.
http://www.issues2000.org/tx/Ron_Paul_Abortion.htm
What'd Stalin say?
"It's not the people who vote that count. It's the people who count the votes." (Josef Stalin)
Rigged, staged, scripted, phony elections. Bought, manure-head whore traitors parroting the talking point news. The NWO spotlighted turd of the month, fat-ass scumbag Newt, is just more reason even the dumbest of the dumbed down should see right through this hollow globalist freak show theater.
RON PAUL 2012
The “Dream Act” candidate is a nightmare.
Newt was so successful as Speaker of the House from 1995 to 1999 that Congress decided almost to a man to get rid of him with a vote of 395 to 28; if that isn’t failure, I don’t know what is. The Dems loved him, of course, because he would “work with them.” Said the Dems, we’ve never had a Republican speaker who would work with us like Newt.
Newt is a dangerous, arrogant bailout man, an open-border globalist who gave us NAFTA and GATT and destroyed the American Dream for Americans. He is anathema to the Tea Party, to the people who wanted to break-up a cancerous, tyrannical centralized Big Brother government. His international corporation immigration policy equates to amnesty: “We are not going to deport 11 million people’ Gingrich said at his first forum on Latino issues. (“Newt: ‘We are not Going to Deport 11 Million People’,” FoxNews.com; nation.foxnews.com, 12/2/2010)
Discussing the DREAM Act that provides conditional permanent residency to illegals at the same forum: “The status quo is unacceptable and clinging to the status quo — or tougher versions of it — is neither conservative nor principled. It has become clear that the only viable approach to reform is combining enforcement with additional legal avenues for those who wish to work in our economy, while also addressing the situation of those already here in the U.S.”
the system is broken, and finding the one honest man isn't a solution, as Washington is a factory which turns honest men into crap.
however if we restore the checks and balances to a pre WW2 level the people will have more confidence in what Congress does. history tells us that after W2 America became a superpower in a few short years, but we still had the same three branches, all equal. which is ponderous and indecisive at times. we needed a UNITARY DECIDER and poof! here comes George Bush.
no one told him at the time that the role of Superhero Commander in Chief was no longer necessary. at least Obama has never had his picture taken in a flight suit saying mission accomplished.
the executive office has way too much power, too much power over the budget and spending, Congress passes the budget BUT the POTUS submits it, and defines its contents. Congress also declares war, and controls the money supply, i.e. the Federal Reserve, and if anyone thinks placing Congress in charge of interest rate policies is insane, should consider what we have is insane. certainly we don't want committees meddling in the free market, THAT's the point.
I say give Congress back what they had fifty years ago and things will work, people will behave rationally, and the public will care about who they elect. in theory anyway Gingrich isn't as bad as we imagine, if he would only stick to core Conservative values but we suspect, and probably correctly, that he will do a Bush, a 180 and turn into a raging globalist, ergo turn the throne in the Oval Office into a lawn chair and America will be a lot better for it.
And didn't Eisenhower say a thing or two about the military-industrial complex back then?
It's not a real Democracy until you have "None of the Above" on the ballot.
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what's for supper.
At least in America, the lamb have the second amendment.
oligarchy is two wolves getting a thousand sheep to carve each other up and present themselves as dinner.
On the subject of "lambs"...
"I ate his liver with a side of fava beans & a nice Chianti"
~Hannibal Lechter
So true. Instead you have a choice of a) clown riding on a donkey or b) clown riding on an elephant. Both guaranteed to amuse and delude the masses for four years or more.
Well, Soreass ought to know, since he is one of the OWS primary funding sources.
that requirement does not extend to US citizens or legal alien residents.
there you go, it's not required, but it's not expressly prohibited either, they don't have to do it, but it sure leaves the door open so they can if they want to.
that one word potentially wipes out any legal protection we had against the formerly unlawful indefinite seizure, detention and imprisonment of US citizens without due process. so now, instead of being able to rest upon the protections as provided by the bill of rights, we are reduced to hoping the PTB's won't exploit this loop hole in the language.
and that is a fools hope at best.
Meanwhile, it's just another BTFD day. Unreal.
NewT Threatens to Pull Out of the Debates if the Crowd Can't Applaud
http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/24/gingrich-says-he-will-skip...
Newt want the sheeple cheering for him when he says NUKE IRAN, SCREW FREEDOM, ALL HAIL COOOOOOOOOBRA.
Fuck Newt.
Say no to the Bumster:)
A vote for either side is a vote for the same coin owned by powerful corporate interests driving an agenda that intends on nothing less than mutually assured sovereign destruction by way of finance of the whole western world.
The problem though must be gloablly dire and it must be insurmountable. People must be gobless, fearful and beyond all hope first. Only then when the world is on its knees out of the shadows the "solution" will be unveiled.By this stage it will be too late. The world will be happy to give up its freedoms and rights for the new safe solution that has our interests at heart.
As America and Europes goes so goes the world and begins the domino effect. The 100 country central bank system nefariously created by this group over the last century collapses each country by country, one by one and the machinations of this small group of people unveils itself.
Do not doubt the collosal ambitions of this small group of men. They have played quiet and long for a few generations now and they are close, so close.
Caesar has done it before and so it will be done again.
Good article, good thoughts. Lots of work just to keep what we had.
By election time, there will be nothing but sad choices on the ballot. Nothing but left wingnut socialists and right wingnut crony capitalists. Sad.
slight correction ...."left wingnut marxist-crony capitalists and..."
Or "...right wingnut fascist-crony capitalists..."
Allen West: The Uncle Tom's Uncle Tom
Yes on Ron Paul. Wish he were younger to stay with us a long time. Who will take his place....:Thomas Jefferson?"
Ron Paul didn't launch the tea party, you author this article than tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Professor Black and Denninger started the Tea party to take the banksters to task, and Fox New and company Co-opted the movement to focus on healthcare.
I invite all who question this fact to go to Professor Blacks blog and Denninger'blog.
I am voting for Ron Paul, but I will tell you where he stands on the 150.00 per bbls crude prices just before the Lehaman and real estate collapse. I live in Brazoria County,
Ron Paul is my congressmen. I wrote him an email as he was my representative. I tasked him to take the CFTC to task over not reigning in the non-bonafide hedgers and speculators who have distorted the crude market, so the price of gasoline could drop before the economy collapses. You know what he wrote back:
LET THE FREE MARKETS WORK!
Ron Paul is not solution to the chrony capitolism but if he can at least fight the fed a little that would be a start.
+1. At least he is consistent in his discourse. Too bad Denninger or Black didn't run.
Ron Paul didn't launch the tea party, you author this article than tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Professor Black and Denninger started the Tea party to take the banksters to task, and Fox New and company Co-opted the movement to focus on healthcare.
I invite all who question this fact to go to Professor Blacks blog and Denninger'blog.
I am voting for Ron Paul, but I will tell you where he stands on the 150.00 per bbls crude prices just before the Lehaman and real estate collapse. I live in Brazoria County,
Ron Paul is my congressmen. I wrote him an email as he was my representative. I tasked him to take the CFTC to task over not reigning in the non-bonafide hedgers and speculators who have distorted the crude market, so the price of gasoline could drop before the economy collapses. You know what he wrote back:
LET THE FREE MARKETS WORK!
Ron Paul is not solution to the chrony capitolism but if he can at least fight the fed a little that would be a start.
If it weren't for the excessive liquidity that a fiat currency provides the crude prices wouldn't have reached those levels. That is why the fed must go. As for said speculators... Did you write and complain about the" speculators" who made money when the price collapsed to $40 a barrel? How about those that lost their ass when the price collapsed?I suspect not.
The way Wikepedia describes the roots of the Tea Party:
"The Tea Party movement has caucuses in the House of Representatives and the Senate of the United States.[14] The Tea Party movement has no central leadership, but is composed of a loose affiliation of national and local groups that determine their own platforms and agendas. The Tea Party movement has been cited as an example of grassroots political activity, although it has also been described as an example of astroturfing.[15]
"The Tea Party's most noted national figures include Republican politicians such as Ron Paul and his son Rand Paul, Sarah Palin, Dick Armey, Eric Cantor, and Michele Bachmann, with the elder Paul described by some as the "intellectual godfather" of the movement.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_Party_movement
*sarcasm* of course wikipedia is canon. In any case it doesn't really matter.
In the game of realpolitik, brand ownership and credo is plastic. What was once
Denninger's and then palin's may well now be paul's. it's clear RP is the winner
for consistency of message and political engine, and if it forces MSM to focus on
the right issues it will bring a certain measure of success.
Everything hinges on this:
ZHgers know the problems but have not come up with a strategy to wake up our friends and family which is essential to reach a critical mass and change the system; and don't tell me there is no solution for where there is a will there is a way. Where are the pychologists and other creative thinkers who can give us specific techniques to wake up, enlighten and de-program our fellow citizens?
The fundamental problem is transparency. There are intelligent people out there who have given this great thought and do have a plan. I recommend this book -
Republic, Lost: How Money Corrupts Congress - and a Plan to Stop It - Laurence Lessig
http://www.amazon.com/Republic-Lost-Money-Corrupts-Congress/dp/0446576433
The corruption is now endemic but we need to start somewhere. Information is power. Use it. Educate everyone you can.
Thanks. I just bought the audio book.
Aerial View:
+ 1,000
thank you brandon - you are a true patriot....
some other quesitons to ask
are they cia / "ex-cia"?
do they have ties to yale? to skull and bones?
did they vote or favor the patriot act?
do they believe that wtc buildings were not brought down in controlled demolitions using nanothermite?
do they have ties, endorsements, or proclivities to the ford, carnegie, rockefeller, or macarthur foundations?
do they belong to trilateral, bildeberger, bohemian grove, illuminati or other such secret societies?
do they favor the sales tax? vat? flat tax?
"How To Avoid Voting For A Globalist Puppet"
That's a headline you don't/won't get at The New York Times
Having said that I fail to see the issue given the current US President is not only a globalist puppet but a Marxist idealist as well ...hard to have a worse choice than the human retard already in situ
I don't understand and hope that someone can explain this to me: What do people of the Liberty Movement think of the Republic?
I mean, if there's a message that's been stuck with me everytime I hear those from the LM, is the "no state". To turn things from the public sphere to the private sphere. I guess they're more akin to that philosophy of "reducing the beast to the size it can be drowned in the bathtub".
But, wasn't the state the administering body of the Republic? Republic being understood as the public thing, that which is owned by everybody, but not by anyone in particular.
Isn't the privatize-deregulate model completely against the idea of a Republic? Is the liberty movement for such a model?
Yes.
http://silversenator2012.blogspot.com/
this is a great post coming from the one state that is rapidly becoming the front line in the struggle between a shadow government fascist clique of money/war mongers and the real and deeply felt needs of honest citizens. this conflict is not only for the heart and soul of the last remaining free people of this nation but is rapidly becoming literally a matter of life and death. the unwelcome and poisonous tentacles of corporate controlled government are winding and wending their insidious ways into every facet of our lives, largely ignored by an compliant, apathetic and dumbed down populace of propagandized illterates who blindly follow the subliminal messages drilled into their brains by Madison Avenue media suggestion and ELF wave hypnosis. it's good to know that there are people out here in the West who for generations have cultivated independent and self reliant lives and who have a natural in bred resistance to the lies and hypocrisy of the corporate and globalist vipers who have seduced and enslaved the complacent denizens of this present land of the slaves, free of the brave. The six point litmus test for the integrity of our "elected representatives" is moot. In such a cess pool of obvious intractable corruption as Washington DC as well as most other metropolitan centers, nothing short of a wholesale cleasnsing will suffice. Unfortunately this will not be accomplished by letters to the editor or the regularly dispensed opiate of the ballot box but rather by individuals with the courage and integrity to stand up for what they believe.
rush-2112
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQEgZNqa8jE
Puppets, or complete prostitutes?
"The biggest mistake that libertarians make is the way they view government and private sectors. Government is the root of all evil, and the private sector is the source of all good. Libertarians have never figured out that people are the same whether in the government or in the private sector. They will abuse their power regardless of where they perch. That is why government needs to be tied down by the Constitution and the private sector by regulation. Yes, regulation can go too far. Certainly, deregulation has gone too far. The ongoing financial crisis from deregulation and ongoing jobs crisis from offshoring constitute empirical evidence that the belief is false that an unfettered private sector is the source of all good."
http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/01/23/how-libertarian-dogmatists-are-sa...
The last time I checked, NOBODY in the private sector was empowered to collect taxes at the point of a gun, invade foreign nations under the guise of "liberating them", burst into one's residence with police state stormtrooper tactics merely because one is ingesting an unapproved substance, or torture their own customers after secreting extraditing them to foreign lands and then detaining them incommunicado and indefinitely.
no, it brought us dickensian work-houses and exported colonial mercantile mysteries a-la east india company.
government, in theory, is held to account and strives to protect you. if it doesn't you should take direct action.
What a fascinating and interesting theory!
Too bad it has never corresponded with reality.
Government is, in essence, institutionalized coercion and nothing more. I would prefer to participate in a society based on voluntary interaction and decentralized power, rather than one based on the centralization and monopolization of power by a handful of elites who invariably are, or end up as, sociopathic parasites, with the sweeping power (and all too often the desire) to destroy tens of millions of lives all to satisfy their perverted and evil power-hungry whims.
+1 for cogent discourse. (but the italics won't let me)
excellent. me too.
upvote.
RP defends first class travel. Not objecting to first class travel for the reason given, but surprised; Was under the impression that a full fare coach ticket allowed the same flexibility and full-refund advantages.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/16/ron-paul-defends-first-cl_n_120...
Dear Grandfathers and Grandmothers,
We your children need you to step up to the plate for the America you grew up in now more than ever. We need you to wake up and understand who and what is destroying this nation you all built up over our lifetimes.
Only you, the Republican Elders that we all love so much can make the biggest and most powerful change in our nations history. The time to make your last stand for America is now and this is how you can do it.
Please sit down and read these articles and watch the u-tube videos below. Share them with others and then take action to save our country for our children’s children.
Newt Gingrich history:
http://newtexposed.com/
http://www.project.nsearch.com/profiles/blogs/what-is-newt-gingrich-s-vo...
Mitt Romney history:
http://www.salon.com/2012/01/20/the_roots_of_bain_capital_in_el_salvador...
http://www.truthistreason.net/mitt-romneys-bain-capital-owns-clear-chann...
http://www.webcasts.com/kingofbain/
http://www.alaskadispatch.com/article/guide-mitt-romneys-voting-record-i...
Ron Paul history:
http://tulsachange.com/ron-pauls-voting-record-what-does-he-stand-for
http://tulsachange.com/?s=newt+gingrich
After you have compared the voting records of all these politicians, you the sound minded true conservatives will all see that ONLY Ron Paul is the true conservative and the rest of these clowns are just more of the same old bush/obama war for profits and liberty killing agendas rolled into one. It will only be the same old thing if anyone but Ron Paul is elected.
This is the honest truth and if you have consciousness and a real belief in the foundations in which America was established, God, Truth, Justice, Liberty for all, Freedom, then you can not deny what your own heart tells you after seeing all the truths about all these politicians that are running for office. If you are truly honest with yourself, you will plainly see that there is only one recourse for you to take and that is a sound declaration for Ron Paul at your local caucus now. We never needed you as a group more in America and we your grandchildren who are not blinded by the zio-media propaganda machine do plainly see and hear the truth and light in Ron Paul’s messages. We see the real news and DO NOT watch TV or read the tainted newspapers that have long to long mislead the American people into the horrible situation our country is in today. Who has not been affected by the past 12 years of this country’s misdirection and endless wars? What has the bush/obama agenda done for you as an individual? Tax and spend into bankruptcy. Is that conservative?
We are begging you to see the Light and to get active and DO the right up thing one more time for your country. Watching Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich argue about who was more corrupt was like watching two weasels fight over a dead mouse. Warmongers in the heart, both ripping and gnawing at each other with the facts about each others dirty cover ups and corruptions. And then, the host stopped it right in the heat of the truths coming out. How is that for biased reporting? Break time!
You have to think it funny when they throw rocks at each other, but they throw none at Ron Paul. He has stood up honest and proud and that is something that has been forgotten in this country. True honesty. Many of you grew up knowing what that really is. We do not see it much in today’s world do we? Ron Paul is the kind of a man that looks you in the eyes when he speaks to you. Will any of those others that know deep in their hearts they are wrong and corrupted do that?
Bless you and thank you for your time and consideration of this dire situation we are all in. Only you, our Grandparents, the last of Americas great generations can make a difference in this time when America needs you the most. Only your vote for Ron Paul will ensure real changes and the cleaning up of the govt corruptions and fascistic war mongering for the banksters that profit from war and chaos. Only Ron Paul will bring real conservative values back to the White House and none of these other warmongers and representatives of private corporations will. Let us live in Peace.
Please help us now when the very future of this country is at stake. Ask yourselves, who profits from war? Do we your grandchildren?
With all our Love,
Your Grandchildren’s children.
PS: For your viewing pleasure. That debate again and more to study:
"Had a revolution, wrote a constitution"
Ron Paul 1-23-12 Florida Debate
Full Debate Links
Submitted by Kingu on Tue, 01/24/2012 - 00:34.
http://youtu.be/ukqgaRlhzok - Part 1
http://youtu.be/mRIbmnxbiAc - Part 2
http://youtu.be/fsMQPHY4MXY - Part 3
http://youtu.be/uC7vsUwusE4 - Part 4
http://youtu.be/_txrxX8yldQ - Part 5
http://youtu.be/DcwmIe_Y0dw - Part 6
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Comment from:
http://www.dailypaul.com/207464/florida-nbc-republican-presidential-prim...
Gingrich - Troll Under the Bridge
Submitted by TommyPaine on Tue, 01/24/2012 - 01:21.
What a weasel. Gingrich is lying about his background, trying to invoke Goldwater, Reagan, Laffer because he knows these are hot buttons for Republican voters.
Truth is, he supported ROCKEFELLER, not Goldwater. He idolizes FRANKLIN ROOSEVELT, not Ronald Reagan.
Here's a quick snippet from tonight's debate where he says things voters want to hear:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/01/23/gingrich_i...
Here he is saying said he supported Rockefeller:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJQsLFhuyOY
Here is him saying who his favorite president is:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CgdzZJePL04
Also, note that tonight he said he went to a "Goldwater organizing session," but does not mention (as he does in the older video) that he was STATE CHAIRMAN for Rockefeller.
Sure knows how to lie by omission, eh?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Getting ready for NDAA!
http://www.kfiam640.com/pages/NEWS.html?article=9653697
***
The other candidates throw no rocks at Ron Paul because they respect him. The have no respect for each other and rightfully so.
A little more objective (MSNBC) not Ron Paul fans, defend this smear and prove that it's bogus. http://youtu.be/Vcn15iZSjQo
Thank you for posting this link. Shame on AP.
Anyone awake today understands that unless the good Doctor somehow manages to get by the media, the big money, and Diabold programmers then it matters not who read the telepromter. For those who actually set the agenda as dictated through them will unfortunately still be lurking in the bushes.
http://youtu.be/SyX1updJwsk
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones :
In June 1979, an unknown person or persons under the pseudonym R. C. Christian hired Elberton Granite Finishing Company to build the structure.[2] One popular hypothesis is that the patron's pseudonym may be a tribute to the legendary 17th-century founder of Rosicrucianism, Christian Rosenkreuz
A message consisting of a set of ten guidelines or principles is engraved on the Georgia Guidestones in eight different languages, one language on each face of the four large upright stones. Moving clockwise around the structure from due north, these languages are: English, Spanish, Swahili, Hindi, Hebrew, Arabic, Chinese, andRussian.
As of November 14, 2009, the stones bear a variety of graffiti. Hopefully including: RP2012
I think you should rename this article: Why NOT to vote for newt gingrich...... as if ZH readers needed this.
In the end it will come down to left establishment vs. right establishment.
The puppet show continues... and we will fall for it everytime until we replace the 5MM viewers of the republican presidential debates with the 18mm viewers of american idol.
What was Romney's take home last year? Something like 45 million. Now there's someone that is going to represent Joe Sixpack's interests. And Gingrinch showing off his animal instincts at Bohemian Grove. It's a conspiracy I tell you.