Guest Post: As M2 Money Supply Rolls Over, The Stock Market Will Follow

Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Charles Hugh Smith from Of Two Minds

As M2 Money Supply Rolls Over, the Stock Market Will Follow

M2 money supply rose sharply, driving the stock market higher. Now it has peaked and rolled over. That does not bode well for the Bull market.

Our Chartist Friend from Pittsburgh kindly shared a chart of M2 money supply and the S&P 500 stock market index (SPX). The correlation between expansion of the money supply and the stock market is worth studying.

The primary point is that “real growth,” i.e. rising wages and profits powered by increases in productivity, does not require massive growth of M2.

Here is Chartist Friend from Pittsburgh's explanatory commentary:

"He who controls the money supply of a nation controls the nation." President James A. Garfield

 

Except during periods of exceptional earnings growth like we had during the pre-internet computer boom when companies like Microsoft, Oracle and Intel were improving business productivity by leaps and bounds, the trend of the stock market (and economic growth in general) tends to closely follow changes in Fed controlled money supply growth.

 

The outlier earnings growth of the 1980's and early 90's PC and database revolution was so strong that the Fed was able to take its foot off the monetary accelerator without causing a corresponding drop in stock prices. Once every business was fully computerized in the mid 90's the Fed floored it again to support stocks and create the Internet Bubble. Since then every time the Fed has taken its foot off the M2 accelerator the market trend has turned negative and the economy has gone into recession.

 

That appears to be what is happening right now.

 

Note the clear correlation of the 1987 crash and the breakdown from a 20-year dome-top of M2 growth that occurred during the late 80's. The two downtrend lines are parallel on the chart.

Thank you, Chartist Friend from Pittsburgh. As many observers have noted, you can expand the money supply but if that money ends up stashed as bank reserves, it never enters the real economy, nor does it flow into household earnings. The velocity of that "dead money" is near-zero.

M2 declined in the housing bubble as the velocity of money skyrocketed: everyone was pulling money out of housing equity via HELOCs (home equity lines of credit) and spending the "free money" on cruises, furniture, big-screen TVs, boats, fine dining, etc. The recipients of that spending also borrowed and spent as if the "free money" would never end.

If M2 expansion is the only thing propping up an artificial market, what happens to the stock market rally as M2 rolls over?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
idea_hamster's picture

M2 is a good statistic, but what's M3 doing?

Oh, right -- the government stopped tracking and reporting it as soon as it became inconveniently negative.

Dr. Engali's picture

Exactly, it's the same when they constantly change how they track inflation when if can't get the results they desire.

Skateboarder's picture

 

Wiki says

  • M0: The total of all physical currency including coinage. M0 = Federal Reserve Notes + US Notes + Coins. It is not relevant whether the currency is held inside or outside of the private banking system as reserves.
  • M1: The total amount of M0 (cash/coin) outside of the private banking system plus the amount of demand deposits, travelers checks and other checkable deposits
  • M2: M1 + most savings accounts, money market accounts, retail money market mutual funds, and small denomination time deposits (certificates of deposit of under $100,000

"Money supply," from what I understand of currencies, is supposed to be an indicative measure of the amount of money circulating and actually available for deposit/withdrawal in the physical. When it is tainted with credit, as ours is, it is no longer credible. I call horseshit on our "money supply."

SMG's picture

John Williams still estimates M3 on his site, if you're interested:

http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/money-supply-charts

 

 

Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

Fiat is not money. It is currency.  Money must maintain its wealth.  It must preserve itself.  This on a molecular level.

Precious metal is money, and nothing lse is.  On this Friday, the 13th, take back the money supply.

Buy Silver!!

crawldaddy's picture

precious metal is not money/wealth either. In certain situations I wouldnt trade you a pound of food for a pound of gold. 

crawldaddy's picture

two idiots here, any others want to vote down a truthful statement? have at it hoss.  fucking idiots.

Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

How is it that people think that if the banking system fails, people will stop producing food?  It is like without the banks we will curl up and die.

For tens of thousands of years we did not use fiat currency, nor did we have Central Banks, nor did we have banks.  We traded in gold and silver, because it is money, and we did great.  We had some great socities.

So when I go to trade you silver for a meal, and you say "No", I will find someone else.  And besides, who says I want to trade you my silver for your food?

Paul Atreides's picture

Why only food? I would happily trade numerous items for silver and vice versa:

Coffee/Tea

Sugar

Spices

Ammunition

Shoes

Rope

Seeds

Clothes

Shelter

Fuel

and whatever else I might have available!

Paul Atreides's picture

We can mark that one under labour...

crawldaddy's picture

would you trade seeds for rope?  how about  clothes for shelter?  In certain situations, barter takes over and silver/gold may be used or it MAY NOT be needed.  My point 

oddjob's picture

Parasitical Bankers need people to believe the world can't get by without them.

johnnyyuma's picture

If the banking system fails, that would a crises. Could it be martial law carried out by brownshirted Homeland Security. In the president's most recent (Friday the ^th- July, states in a crises, The POTUS would controll the food supply and communications. Let that sink in.

Paul Atreides's picture

Take your fear mongering elsewhere, let them come try!

NooooB's picture

It's just the race to the bottom that will end without the banks.

They have the world in a ridiculous competition for their usury.

crawldaddy's picture

silver and so forth are but ONE commodity used for barter. It isnt the only one, or even a universal one, same with gold.  That is my point.  You act as if it is some sort of universal currency, it is not.

 

When country is stable fiat is fine

when country is becoming unstable silver/gold are a decent hedge against future inflation

When the shit hits the fan bad, BARTER takes over.  SOme may trade for silver/gold some may not. Suddenly seeds, food, bullets become more precious than some basically useless metal.

 

Thats my point.

MeBizarro's picture

Without a functioning credit system, yeah agricultural production yields will go down the toilet and collapse especially given how capital-intensive modern farming has become in most of the world. 

pods's picture

Your statement was nonsensical and worth junking.

And it was about as far away from factual as you can get.

How is it that you cannot see that?  

Paul Atreides's picture

Silver and gold are the only honest, non counterparty risk forms of money available, double down voted!

crawldaddy's picture

thousands of years of bartering and values in various commodities prove you wrong.

zaphod's picture

I would never ever ever sell a pound of gold for a pound of food. There has never been a period in history where valuation reached to that point. If you're worried about a complete collapse, then you should have already prepared and secured your food supplies...

crawldaddy's picture

you are ignorant on history, as it seems many are.

Umh's picture

If you have to give away a pound of gold or silver for a pound of food you are in a position to die soon anyway.

roadlust's picture

If you "save" your gold when starving, instead of buying food, Darwin will be proven correct again.

PivotalTrades's picture

So what you are saying is that there is no money/wealth except for food!

Do you think about what you write or just post whatever moronic thought enters your head.

I guess you would trade that pound of food for a pound of fiat.

Or just what are you trying to say?

Do you vote,, that might be the problem with our once great country.

Tijuana Donkey Show's picture

Until the industrial revolution, money was simply a stored value of food. Ergo, that is why for the first 120,000 years of human existance before civilization, gold and silver ment very little. A pound of food is priceless when 1 out of 7 Americans waddles into Mall-Wort to use their SNAP benefits to buy a few days of food at a time. One supply chain disruption could starve a large part of America, as most people are terminally obese, and couldn't survive a phase where they have to walk, work, etc. I might not eat people, but I'll use blubber for lamp oil........

crawldaddy's picture

I am saying there is many commodities other than just silver and gold, as circumstance would dictate.

 

AS for your voting remark, you cant even grasp a simple concept yet you try to insult. You are an idiot. The typical ignorant arrogant ass that is too ignorant to know how stupid he really is.

azzhatter's picture

I agree it's not money but it is a store of wealth

crawldaddy's picture

exactly, one of many, real estate, fine art are others.

Meesohaawnee's picture

but but ...Cramer says its about earning... He cant be lying can he?

AcidRastaHead's picture

If only he had a Chartist Friend he could call his own.

crawldaddy's picture

bingo baby...  its deflation time, we have been living in it for a few years now, I wonder how long til the genius  ( I mean computer algos) on wall street catch on

Cole Younger's picture

They won't catch on....that is why a massive crash is inevitable...

Mr_Wonderful's picture

Well, there´s many times more debt than money and staggering amounts in insurance contracts where this system somehow insures its own sustainability. Meanwhile we´re in a long and rising wave of productivity increases and decreasing demand for labor. It´s difficult to see a benign end game in economies that are mostly dependent upon consumer spending.

Peter K's picture

F**k me. We are all monetarists now. Thank's uncle Milton :)

Doubleguns's picture

When the PPT has no money they can not play the game.

JustObserving's picture

The PPT will always have fiat money.  They can print as much as they want.

TruthInSunshine's picture

Blasphemy!

They will always have "more" paper or electronic money (even if of significantly & increasingly lesser grade, diminished value & affect than their prior batches).

 

http://www.clker.com/cliparts/S/F/y/h/G/9/ctrl-p.svg

OldPhart's picture

OT

Talk goes on about the third California Municipal Bankruptcy in two weeks http://tinyurl.com/san-burn-a-ghetto  Is Victorville next? http://tinyurl.com/desert-city-in-hot-water
Cole Younger's picture

It is easier for politicians to claim bankruptcy then to admit to their mistakes...politically, the politicians don't want to cut spending so they will ask a judge to do it for them...

crawldaddy's picture

CA is fucked because their tax system is so fucked up.  They have the most incredible stupid unfair property tax laws in america.

johnnyyuma's picture

Don't worry about them. They will be saved by the thousands of good union jobs generated by the recently passed High Speed Rail project. Everybody gets a chicken in the pot for rainbow stew. I fear ultimatly, the taxpayers in the flyover regions will be on the hook to bail them out.

 

bonderøven-farm ass's picture

CA is 'fucked' because their citizens got the government they voted for.....watch the dominoes fall.

Haddock's picture

They were good times. Let's cancel the debt and get the free money flowing again. Noone died.

fnordfnordfnord's picture

...except a few brown people in Durkadurkastan.

Inthemix96's picture

M1s and M2s are alright,

Challenger 2s are better though, ;-)

SheepDog-One's picture

Ok so we know theres absolutely no reason stocks should do anything but collapse in half from here.....so S&P 1,700 next obviously?