This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Guest Post: The Trouble With Printing Money

Tyler Durden's picture


Submitted by Chris Martenson from PeakProsperity

The Trouble with Printing Money

For a while now, I have been expecting a coordinated, global central bank action that would seek to print more money out of thin air, or "QE" (quantitative easing), as it is now called.  Now we have two of the most important central banks, that of the U.S. (the Federal Reserve) and in Europe (the ECB) having committed to open-ended, limitless QE.

In Part I of this report, we analyze the actions themselves, and then in Part II we discuss the implications to individuals and those with responsibilities to manage money.

The most recent announcement came from the Fed, and it had these features:

  1. The creation of $40 billion a month out of thin air to purchase agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS)
  2. The continuation of Operation Twist, which uses short-term Treasury bills and notes on its books to purchase long-term Treasury paper (that's 10- and 30- year bonds)
  3. When MBS payments come in – the Fed holds over $840 billion dollars of those – they will buy still more MBS paper ('rolling' the payments into new MBS, as it were).
  4. Taken together, the Fed will expand its balance sheet holdings of long-term assets (i.e., "debt") by ~$85 billion per month through the end of the year...but wait!  There's more...
  5. This time, unlike the prior two QE efforts, the actions will be taken without any pre-defined limit.   
  6. QE will continue until the labor market improves "substantially," whatever that means.  But wait...there's even more!
  7. If deemed necessary, the Fed will "purchase additional assets" and "employ other policy tools."
  8. As if all that weren't enough, for good measure, the Fed committed to a six-month extension of the 0.0% to 0.25% target range for the Fed Funds rate until at least mid 2015.

That laundry list can be summarized as 'we will do whatever it takes.'  If anyone was still wondering if the Fed would 'allow' deflation to happen on its watch under Bernanke, perhaps the above points in combination with QE 1 and QE 2 will settle their minds.

But will it work? 

Well, that all depends on what your definition of 'work' is. 

Without context, I really don't know how to explain the importance of these recent actions.  In order to address the implications of this historic move – remember, now is the time to keep a journal, as your future relatives will want to know all about what happened 'back then' – I'm going to rewind this story back a few years.

Review of How We Got Here

Since the very beginning of my public writings, I have leaned heavily towards the path of inflation, by which I mean money printing or its electronic equivalent, because even a cursory review of history will show that leaders have always chosen a little money printing today and the possibility of inflation tomorrow over the immediate pain of having to live within their means or with the consequences of their poor decisions.

That was just a fancy way of saying 'humans will be humans,' and while our technology has advanced tremendously over the past few decades, our DNA blueprints are virtually identical to those found in people living 50,000 years ago.  History can tell us much.

Our current predicament has its roots way back in the early 1980s, when something changed in our collective psyches that allowed us to abandon thrift and savings in favor of spending and borrowing.  This first chart, which references the U.S. (but in reality could apply equally well to most developed countries) show how borrowing has outpaced income (debt vs. GDP).

In order to believe that the Fed or any other central bank can get us back to 'normal,' you have to believe that it is normal for borrowing to exceed income and (here's the kicker) that it can do so forever.  Many people cling to the thin hope that somehow the Fed and its related entities across the globe can get us safely back on the yellow line in the above chart, angling forever upwards at 45 degrees.

Well, if it's not possible for you, personally, to forever borrow more than you earn without someday getting into financial difficulty, it is not possible for two or ten or 310 million of you to do so.  The math does not change simply because a nation is involved instead of an individual.

To really drive home the point that what our leaders have accepted as 'normal' and are endeavoring to resurrect is anything but normal, I find it useful to present this chart, which shows how the total credit market debt (that's everything) in the U.S. has doubled and then doubled again and again and again over the past four decades:

What 'getting back to normal' requires is that we find a way to continue expanding debt exponentially with a doubling time of around 8 years.  That's what the last forty years have seen, and that's the period during which every single leader at the Fed and in DC grew up and developed their views around 'how the world works.'

Unfortunately that's not how the world actually works.  In the real world your income and expenditures have to eventually balance, and the only question is whether this is accomplished through diligence or catastrophe.  The prior forty years were an admirably sustained departure from reality, but like all teenage road trips fueled with a pilfered credit card, the practices of those times were unsustainable and destined to end.

Hopefully by widening up our lens a little bit, we can more easily appreciate that instead of being 'normal', the vast expansion of debt was actually quite abnormal, and therefore attempts to resuscitate its prior trajectory are (1) certain to fail and (2) going to make the final crunch a lot more painful and damaging than it otherwise needs to be.

And oh, by the way – world oil is trading at $114 per barrel.  Recoveries are tricky business at half that price.

QE Will Lift Stocks and Commodities

While left out of the official FOMC (Federal Open Market Committee) policy statements, but not Wall Street Journal editorial pages, is that a primary goal of the Fed is to boost stock prices.  The stated reason is that the so-called wealth effect will lead households to view their rising portfolio statements and go out and spend more money.  An underlying reason has to also be the fact that pensions, endowments, and other long-running actuarial pools of money are being destroyed by too-low rates of interest on bond holdings and desperately need stock-market gains to cover some of the shortfall.

QE and its distant cousin Operation Twist both serve to lift stock prices.  QE does this in two ways – first by dumping money into the financial system, which then has to go somewhere and do something, so some of it ends up in the stock market, and second by driving down interest rates, which has the tendency to push money into stocks.

Operation Twist, which is balance-sheet-neutral for the Fed (short-dated securities are traded for long-dated securities – it's a swap) only serves to drive down interest rates on the long end of the curve.  No new money is created.

As we can see, stocks respond well to both types of stimulus:

As we might also note, when the stimulus ends, stocks respond unfavorably.  It would seem that the Fed is now trapped and that if it ever pulls away from the market there will be a rout of historic proportions.

Commodities really only respond to new money, which makes sense.  Lower interest rates on the long end of the curve do not change the preference for commodities much, and so Twist might be expected to do little, if anything, for commodities.  That's exactly what we see in the data:

While the Fed may not be too pleased with rising commodity prices (with all that's going on in the world with unrest, drought, and $114 Brent crude), it seems quite likely that rising commodity prices stand a good chance of being a feature of QEternity, or whatever this new program will finally be branded.

The Trouble with Printing Money

It is against the larger backdrop of borrowing and spending well beyond our means that we need to interpret this most recent effort by the Fed to print our way back to prosperity.

One way to look at the $40 billion per month in new printing is to compare it to individuals and households.  Remember, money only comes into your life through effort, and that's why it has value and can function as a store of value.  Once upon a time you could make the choice as to whether to work to find money (by mining gold or silver) or work to earn money by farming or practicing a trade, craft, or service.  Note that work was always involved.   

What does it mean that the Fed can just up and print $40 billion per month indefinitely without performing any work whatsoever? 

Well, let's put that in context.  If an individual earns $50,000 per year, then each month the Fed is effectively printing up the yearly output of 800,000 such individuals.  Said another way, if you earn $50k, then you'd have to work for 800,000 years to earn the same amount of money the Fed prints each month.

Given that the median household income is ~$50k, this means that after one year of MBS purchases, the Fed will have printed up as much money as 9,600,000 households will have earned.  Presto!  Just like that, the Fed is effectively creating the exact same purchasing power as nearly 10 million US households, or 25 million people (I'm rounding a bit here).

And nobody had to do anything except push a key on a computer a couple of times.

While the Fed can wrap this magic act in all sorts of covering language about dual mandates, maximum employment, and price stability, the simple fact remains that money printed out of thin air cannot, has not, and will not ever lead to prosperity.  How could it?  It arises without any effort at all, no work performed, no goods transformed or lives improved, no land planted and tended well, no services rendered, and no capital formed.  It is just conjured into existence.

It is just new money tossed after bad debts, with both remaining to work their different insidious effects on the economy and our daily lives.  If printed money could lead to prosperity, trust me – some culture would have worked it out long ago, because people every bit as clever and determined as those alive today (and with the same DNA software installed) have tried it again and again.

If it could work, then we should just print every household up a nice $1,000,000 check each year and let everybody stay home, take vacations, and drive nice cars.  It's just an absurd notion, and this is why you should keep a journal – you live in absurd times.


How does all this end?  Like it has every other time in history, with a final destruction of the currencies involved.  That's my best guess.

This is why I view all of the QE efforts to date, and those that will certainly follow, not only with suspicion but as a series of unforgivably narrowly-conceived efforts that will combine into one of the most colossal failures ever experienced by modern man.

In Part II: Understanding the Implications of QE3 we analyze how the recently-announced liquidity measures by the world's largest central banks will impact major asset classes (stocks, bonds, precious metals, commodities, real estate). And at a higher level, we look at why – at the dawn of this next phase of our economic and fiscal descent – prioritizing wealth preservation is essential. I remain convinced that the fate of most will be to lose most of their wealth during this process by trusting that the majority cannot be wrong when that is exactly the most likely case.

Click here to read Part II of this report (free executive summary; paid enrollment required for full access).


- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:11 | 2811178 Victorio
Victorio's picture

Fiat destruction, bitchez.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:17 | 2811216 GetZeeGold
GetZeeGold's picture



Johnny.....get back in there and print print print!!!

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:23 | 2811253 MillionDollarBonus_
MillionDollarBonus_'s picture

The manifesto of the progressive revolution:

Part 1 - Rich People

I feel angry when libertarians start talking about the free market and 'personal responsibility'. I'm not interested at all in discussing how to create value in the real world and trade that value for goods and services that I want. I don't "want" goods and services - I need them, and deserve them. CEOs and big shots make hundreds of millions of dollars a year, which has a direct tangible negative effect on my life. I simply cannot live my life without taking just a little bit of that money for myself, and donating just a little bit of that money to causes that I deem to be worthwhile and desirable. My principle objective in life is to make sure that NOONE gets to make such obscene amounts of wealth. Rich people are no better than rapists and murders. It is absolutely immoral to make millions of dollars a year, and high income earners should be punished just like any other criminal. The government, on the other hand is 100% legitimate, and warrants no criticism whatsoever, other than when they help the rich. It is immoral for the rich to control the power of the state, but perfectly moral for voters, unions and environmental groups to control the power of the state.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:33 | 2811276 Dalago
Dalago's picture

"It is immoral for the rich to control the power of the state, but perfectly moral for voters, unions and environmental groups to control the power of the state."


What the fuck are you talking about?  A rich person is a voter... Develop something high in demand and make shit-tons of money then go say success is immoral.  Whats immoral is the lack of charity; Caritas.  When Rome was a Republic it was the morals of the people to donate money to the less franchised.  There was MORE a community feel when the middle-man (government) is taken out.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 12:00 | 2811414 Fukushima Sam
Fukushima Sam's picture

We're now in year 99 of the 100-year plan.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 12:38 | 2811566 redpill
redpill's picture

Next year we'll say Happy 100th Birthday Fed!  Only took them 100 years to destroy our currency, obliterate our economy, mongrelize our populace into brainless automoton borrow-consumers, and make the rest of the world hate us for nearly endless warmaking.  Isn't centrally-planned fiat currency GREAT?

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 13:45 | 2811881 onebir
onebir's picture

A Crips & Bloods community feel. But that's going by the TV series ;)

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:28 | 2811281 SilverIsKing
SilverIsKing's picture

I can't wait for Part 2...

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 12:11 | 2811474 lasvegaspersona
lasvegaspersona's picture

MDB you used sarcasm here which threw me off (I think it was sarcasm) anyway this was NOT your best stuff. Yesterday you were on FIRE, I guess every troll has a bad day....maybe tomorrow you'll be better....don't let that tiny brain ever quit!!

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:24 | 2811255 Dalago
Dalago's picture

bullish on toner.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 12:14 | 2811481 whatsinaname
whatsinaname's picture

The something that changed in 80s was the stock market and the advent of the 401k programs ?

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 13:09 | 2811729 BooMushroom
BooMushroom's picture

Yup. From wiki:

The section of the Internal Revenue Code that made 401(k) plans possible was enacted into law in 1978. It was intended to allow taxpayers a break on taxes on deferred income. In 1980, a benefits consultant named Ted Benna took note of the previously obscure provision and figured out that it could be used to create a simple, tax-advantaged way to save for retirement. Ironically, the client he was working for at the time chose not to create a 401(k) plan.[3]

So that's about the same time that J6P started 'saving' by playing a percent Of his income (matched by a percent of his employer's income) in the casino, and not paying taxes on it.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 16:53 | 2812832 blunderdog
blunderdog's picture

Yup and yup.

Yet people and pundits STILL attribute the "market miracle" to the politicians for their "bold leadership."

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:11 | 2811179 Satan
Satan's picture

As the saying goes..." the only thing we learn from history is that we learn nothing from history".

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:18 | 2811223 GetZeeGold
GetZeeGold's picture



Screw history......just teach your high school kids they're special.


Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:11 | 2811180 LULZBank
LULZBank's picture

Lack of enough ink and paper.. Bitchezz!!!

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:13 | 2811189 LawsofPhysics
LawsofPhysics's picture

Thanks Chris, build real wealth in those around you.  Your family, your employees, your community.  Unless you have a private island and private army (like a couple venture capital guys I know) you will need each other.  Long physical assets of real value and the labor to defend them.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:14 | 2811196 moskov
moskov's picture

Don't worry. Those bankers are like suicide bombers.

They care less about any lives in this world.

They only believe money is their god and money can make the world theirs.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:14 | 2811197 Shocker
Shocker's picture

What a t-wreck this entire economy is. Between Wars, Currency problems, Job Issues, we got some serious issues.

Who know where it will all end

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:15 | 2811202 francis_sawyer
francis_sawyer's picture

I actualy have one of those ONE HUNDRED TRILLION DOLLAR Zimbabwe notes... I have it in a frame right next to a FRN... (at least the frame is prolly worth something ~ & it's mde out of 'fools gold')...

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:39 | 2811326 Vincent Vega
Vincent Vega's picture

I have a 100T Zimbabwe note also. Along with about another 15-18 worthless currencies. I use them for demonstration purposes. Pull out a 100T Zimbabwe and lay it next to a Morgan or Peace dollar and ask people which they would rather have. Deer in headlights looks will abound. Devaluation is happening here right now. Don't be fooled.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:51 | 2811389 Clueless Economist
Clueless Economist's picture

I carry a 100 Trillion Zimbabwe note in my Peace Dollar Pontiac money clip.  I get the same deer in headlights look as people say wow how much is that worth?  I love the look when I say it is worthless just as the FRB notes will be, but not this Peace $ etc etc


Wed, 09/19/2012 - 12:07 | 2811454 Vincent Vega
Vincent Vega's picture

"how much is that worth?" I wish I had a Peace $ for every time I've heard that during my demonstration.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:14 | 2811203 Robot Traders Mom
Robot Traders Mom's picture

The Fed wants their tax (inflation). That is no secret. Obviously, the Fed could theoretically mail each citizen a check for $10k tomorrow and they would get the inflation they are looking for. 


Make no mistake, they will do everything, including throwing the kitchen sink out to get inflation. I'm not fighting the Fed on this one, nor should any of you. BUY METALS and HOLD THEM. If you start charting and trying to trade them, you can easily get burned. You know what the end game is, BE PATIENT!



Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:53 | 2811397 sdmjake
sdmjake's picture

Agreed. But the real question is:

How did someone so stupid come from your loins?

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 12:07 | 2811457 iDealMeat
iDealMeat's picture

First came RT..  Then came RTM..

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 12:02 | 2811413 Blasé Faire
Blasé Faire's picture

To stimulate growth, why not send a charge card with $168.25 to every adult each month?  That would be the same $40bn per month and it would ensure that every dollar gets spent paying bills or going into the economy.  I guess the problem would be people spending wrecklessly - probably on the wrong kinds of shiny stuff.

*Using 2011 population stats

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:15 | 2811204 krispkritter
krispkritter's picture

Bubble Ben huffed and he puffed until he blew the House of Cards down...

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:23 | 2811205 Landotfree
Landotfree's picture

"$40 billion a month out of thin air"

Money does not get created out of thin air except possibly from the big bang.   Hairless monkeys decided way back in the day to start lending and borrowing at a rate of interest, eventually the system can't sustain the system... all the hairless monkeys take their rocks home... whatever civilization they had starts to collapse along with the credit system.  Hairless monkeys no longer have enough of the stuff they have been using as money so they start using credit as money.  Eventually the system can't generate the amount of new credit to sustain the system, eventually collapse.   

Nothing has changed in 1000s of years.  The system will rise ,the system will peak and the system will collapse.   Blaming the Fed is like blaming buglar alarm for getting caught breaking into someone's house.  A little late to be complaining.

The Fed will squeeze all you unfunded liabilities until max potential has been reached, after that there is little they can do but to watch along side you.   As far as I can see the Fed has completed it's mission by assisting in the creation of the biggest system the world has seen to date before it collapses.  

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:17 | 2811215 dugorama
dugorama's picture

It might have worked (QE1 and 2), had we had the cojones to get it to the consumers rather than the bankstas.  Giving them more is obviously nonsense - no demand is or has been created, there is no debt relief for the consumer and there is no tax relief.  

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:19 | 2811231 Landotfree
Landotfree's picture

Unless you believe the Fed and humans have unlimited power, no it will not work and never could work.  It will end in collapse, it was just a matter of when, not if.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:20 | 2811236 Pseudo Anonym
Pseudo Anonym's picture

talk to mish shedlock

If anyone was still wondering if the Fed would 'allow' deflation to happen on its watch

he's pretty silent on the topic of deflation he's been peddling around for awhile

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:25 | 2811260 Landotfree
Landotfree's picture

Eventually the system will collapse, credit creation will go below zero again in the tunes of trillions.  A new currency will be attempted but credit creation will not happen for decades, eventually my guess 1-3 billion unfunded liabilities will have to go... only 100+ million went last time but the system was only a fraction of what it is this time.  I predict the unfunded liabilities will be deflating by 1-3 billion.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:35 | 2811319 Pseudo Anonym
Pseudo Anonym's picture

you wrote that:

credit creation will go below zero again

how can credit go below zero?  hypothetically, if credit is less than zero, than debit would be greater than zero, which, at the end gives you zero.  hyperinflation = deflation?

shedlock ( ) , at some point was arguing something similar but i dont have the link.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:44 | 2811334 Landotfree
Landotfree's picture

Credit creation went negative in 2008, did it not?  Go see the Fed's Z1 report, matter of fact it didn't start going positive until late 2011/early 2012.

"than debit would be greater than zero, which, at the end gives you zero"

Total debt is above zero, debt shrank, system was starting to collapse in a big way.   Without the Fed and the government doing what they do, your ATM cards would have stopped working years ago.  Eventually the amount to sustain the system will not be matched, your ATM cards will just stop working.  Not much anyone can do about it but delay as long as possible.

What you have been witnessing over the last few years is the dead cat bounce.   The equation always wins the war but loses countless battles along the way.   

The system must be feed at an exponential rate, failure to feed the equation cause the equation to feed on the unfunded liabilities eventually.   

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:53 | 2811399 Pseudo Anonym
Pseudo Anonym's picture

credit creation declined (did not create as much) when compared to previous period, but did not go negative in absolute terms - as if all credit was wiped out to zero and then went somehow below zero into debit territory

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 12:09 | 2811431 Landotfree
Landotfree's picture


The system was not generating any new credit when taking in account past credit payments due.   It was actually 2009 when it went negative in Q2.

Total Credit Market Debt went from $52.899T (Q1) to $52.73T (Q2).  So, the system was generating new credit into the system at a negative ($676B) annuallized by end of Q2 2009.   This is versus an expansion at a rate nearly at a positive $4.7T in 2007.... within a 6 quarter time frame the credit market did a $5.3+T turn around.   In essence, credit was being wiped out faster than it could be created, or was being created.

The system is only generating about $1T of new credit annualized right now, it's a dead cat bounce.  If the system had not started the collapse, the system would be if normal north of $67T by now.

It's called a tapped out system, THAT'S ALL FOLKS.


Wed, 09/19/2012 - 12:53 | 2811393 francis_sawyer
francis_sawyer's picture


The problem with Mish (and other ~ let's call them 'sober' economists) is that despite being sober, they still hitch their reputations on the pseudo SCIENCE of economics (which, in of itself, develops its own patterns based on a pre-fabricated design of the game)...

With that in mind, it is hardly possible for them to predict (even with a 50-50 chance of winning), in which direction the eventual DISMANTLING of the system will topple... Mish (& friends) place their faith in THE MARKET, and the mathematical certainty that it's going to fail... Instead ~ they FAIL to account for any notion that the same market, in the process of being dismantled, can be manipulated in strategic spots (which provide a favorable outcome for the MANIPULATORS)...

All 'economists' like Mish, thoroughly discount the idea of manipulation (because to admit that a market could be 'rigged' would tend to go against their own theories that their hard work & research that has allowed them to 'DECODE' market behavior & therefore discredit their very existence)... They counter with the notion that MARKETS ARE TOO LARGE TO BE RIGGED... The error in that thinking is in NOT accounting for the fact that it's the RULES that count... That bad behavior will be punished... When the rules of the game get constantly changed & when criminals never get prosecuted, then it becomes very easy to manipulate a market...

Failure to accept the notion of RIGGED markets puts someone like Mish in 'coin flipping' territory... Worse ~ it probably bellys them up to the 3 card monte table... 

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:23 | 2811254 Snakeeyes
Snakeeyes's picture

It is now never ending. Gov't wants to spend more, borrow more, print more. until it all collapses.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:28 | 2811263 Landotfree
Landotfree's picture

If nobody spends the system collapses tomorrow, or what are you going to pay the previous interest payments with?

The function of the Fed at the direction of the Government which acts on behave of the people is to expand the system until max potential, once max has been hit nothing else to do but watch the fireworks.  

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:26 | 2811267 Oh regional Indian
Oh regional Indian's picture

On many levels, the core issue with PRINTING money is that it can be counterfeited rather easily.

THAT is why the PTB love it so much. Counterfeited money is probably equal to or more than M(X) of any country.

Non-counterfeit-ablity is the key to the next currency.


Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:26 | 2811268 imapopulistnow
imapopulistnow's picture

Without QE we have deflation.  Why? Deleveraging and demographic trends (aging = less consumption) that result in a contracting economy.  Adding QE into this mix, results in moderate inflation.  Moderate inflation allows economic rebalancing to occur.   It is a relative thing.  It is an appropriate thing.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:38 | 2811333 imapopulistnow
imapopulistnow's picture

Never said it was a popular thing. yuk yuk

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 12:40 | 2811411 madcows
madcows's picture

It is an exceedingly painful and pernicious thing, and by no means appropriate.  The intent of QE is to inflate the problem away.  The result is that the people that lived within their means are punished, whereas those that did not are rewarded.  Risk taking is reward, responsibility is punished.

Further, those that are punished most harshly are the poor and middle class.  These are the people that can least afford inflation.  My personal cost of living (food, clothing, heating oil, gas) is up $12,000 in the past 5 years.  That represents a major portion of my income.  To the rich, not so much. 


Deflation does not hurt the poor and middle class so much.  We don't have as many assets to deflate.  it actually makes our lives easier to afford.  But, Bernanke doesn't run with the downtrodden.  He hangs with the rich and powerful, otherwise known as those that would be most impacted by deflation.  And there you have it.  Bernanke will do whatever it takes to take care of his own kind, of which, I am not.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 16:58 | 2812852 crusty curmudgeon
crusty curmudgeon's picture

"Moderate inflation allows economic rebalancing to occur."

I presume you mean this to be a good thing.  In any event, please do tell us--in words even I can understand--what the hell does that mean?

Ten to one you can't explain it without a comment like, "uh, there's a lot of high math wouldn't understand."

"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication."  --Leonardo DaVinci

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:28 | 2811279 Hedgetard55
Hedgetard55's picture

Ben is a thief, plain and simple, no different from a mugger, an identity thief or a scam artist.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:34 | 2811295 Landotfree
Landotfree's picture

Any person and/or entity that is connected with or uses the system is a "thief" and "mugger".  There really is no difference.

As far as I can tell there are something like 7 billion thieves on this floating rock. 

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:50 | 2811381 Hedgetard55
Hedgetard55's picture


Wed, 09/19/2012 - 12:15 | 2811473 Landotfree
Landotfree's picture

Interesting.  Neo's exact words.

Neo - Bull****. 

*The responses of the other Ones appear on the monitors: "Bull****!"* 

The Architect - Denial is the most predictable of all human responses. But, rest assured, this will be the sixth time we have destroyed it, and we have become exceedingly efficient at it. 

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:30 | 2811286 Anasteus
Anasteus's picture

An interesting interview with Neil Barofsky (served as the Special Inspector General for the TARP program)

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:34 | 2811313 Waterfallsparkles
Waterfallsparkles's picture

The trouble with printing Money is that you devalue Other Peoples Money.

One has to remember that the Private Bankers of the Federal Reserve receive the Interest on the Money Printed.  For them the more they Print the more Money they get in Interest.  The People of the United States are obligated to pay them the Interest thru their Income Taxes and enforced by the IRS.  The Bankers get the interest which compensates them for the Devaluation of the Dollar, so for them it is revenue neutral.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:36 | 2811316 TheObsoleteMan
TheObsoleteMan's picture

The destruction of currencies {globally} has been the plan all along. Do you honestly think all of this was just chance? No, it was policy. An entire generation now has known nothing but over consumption as a way of life. THIS IS THEIR NORMAL. I am old enough to remember when credit cards were first marketed. People paid off their balances in full within 30 days, as a rule. Look what we have today. Who does that? Far too few. They want currency destruction so they can bring about their replacement for it: The cashless society. Electronic money. We are almost there already. Who makes cash purchases anymore? All I ever see is the swiping of cards. It will be an easy transition for most. Most financial transactions are now paperless for the most part anyway, right down to paychecks and government entitlements being direct deposit electronically. Once this is done, your privacy {what little is left} will be a thing of the past. Everything you buy and sell will be recorded. Taxes will be taken off the top, no way to hide from the IRS. Get out of line, and your card will be shut off until you "GET YOUR MIND RIGHT" to borrow a quote from the old movie, Cool Hand Luke. This is the ultimate power. The elites have been planning for it for decades, and have finally cultivated the type of populace that will readily accept it.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:35 | 2811318 oldman
oldman's picture



There is no mystery of DNA mutation when there is 'free money'.

I love free money almost as much as Free Gold, and I can hardly wait for the DNA mutations of Free Gold.

I hope you are making a lot of money with your blog because you really are working hard with a lot of words----a model 'do-nothing dude'

I'm glad you are with us   respectfully        om

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:40 | 2811339 Dr. Engali
Dr. Engali's picture

The part that gets me is the continuous waiting for the dollar bubble to pop. I know it's going to, but what seems like may be catalyst just fades away into yesterday's news. Every day it feels like we are sitting on a knife's edge, and then nothing happens.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:52 | 2811395 Spastica Rex
Spastica Rex's picture

Tension without climax makes for poor story writing. Eventually readers are going to put the book down.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:43 | 2811353 fonzannoon
fonzannoon's picture

gundlach talking about feds exit strategy now. awesome stuff.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:43 | 2811354 foodstampbarry
foodstampbarry's picture

Bankers need their bonuses... Bitchezz.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:49 | 2811371 Flakmeister
Flakmeister's picture

If only the supply of oil could have kept rising....

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:49 | 2811374 venturen
venturen's picture

I love a free lunch!

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:58 | 2811375 proLiberty
proLiberty's picture

The economist Franz Oppenheimer said there were only two ways to create wealth: the "economic means" (free exchange, capitalism) and the "political means"  (government subsidy, regulatory capture, cronyism, monopoly, exproriation, extortion, seizure, etc.)

Money printing is embezellment of wealth by dilution to the benefit of those in charge of passing and supporting the government programs paid for with the new money.  It is to the detrement of those who hold their wealth in the form of the currency being inflated.  The only way to insulate yourself from this theft is to hold as much of your wealth as possible in forms that respond to inflation such as preciouis metals, productive land and the stock of companies that have pricing power and whose profits do not depend upon the polticial means such as companies in heavily subsidized fields like solar power, electric vehicles, biolfuels, etc.

To the extent that this reduces the universe of sustainable investments, it also reduces the number of investors and the amounts they feel is prudent to invest.  But this is in total harmony with Keynesian ideology, which has as one end goal for government to substitute its fiat money for investments and to diminish private savings as the source of investment funds.  This has the effect of enabling fasciam and socialism while making the population dependent upon jobs in companies that are themselves dependent upon the political means for their capital.

In short, it is a means whereby our wealth and our credit rating is usurped by government to the advantage of government and the governing class to secure total control over all economic activity.   It is TREASON and REVOLUTION by economic means.

It is essential for people to understand the ideology behind Keynesian economics.  Keynes' goals were threefold: contol of money, investment and of who can reproduce and who cannot. By these means he worked to bring about a secular Millennial Uptopia.  seeThe Development of Keynes's Economics: From Marshall to Millennialism, by Joseph T. Salerno,






Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:50 | 2811382 luckylongshot
luckylongshot's picture

Printing money works brilliantly when it is issued by the Government, interest free and its issue is linked to productivity as Abraham Lincoln discovered. The problem with this plan is it does not involve the private banking parasites that are trying to suck the public dry and so plan B is printing infinite money as debt and saddling the public with infinite interest payments...although this results in fat parasites and a penniless general public facing effective slavery..The crazy thing is the public in this election will be voting for slavery no matter who they choose.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:59 | 2811418 zerohedgeJUNKIE
zerohedgeJUNKIE's picture

Resulting to fat tapeworms and dead host :( (economy)

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:51 | 2811384 Spastica Rex
Spastica Rex's picture

"Our current predicament has its roots way back in the early 1980s"

I think it goes back about 50 more years, althought the 80s turned the amp up to eleven.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:59 | 2811417 Flakmeister
Flakmeister's picture

Don't touch it! Don't even look at it....


But seriously, the 80's were the oppurtunity to reinvent ourselves, we simply refused to learn the earlier lesson...

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:52 | 2811392 TrustWho
TrustWho's picture

David Stockman spoke the truth in 1986-88 as resigned member of President Reagan's staff. Reagan started the "free funding" money for federal government where significant funding came from debt. The Japanese loved it, because they could weaken their currency with a large USA trade surplus by re-circulating Japanese dollars back to USA by buying USA bonds. China joins WTO and copies the Japanese model.

Prior to President Reagan, USA government debt was less than $1 trillion. To be fair to Reagan, he could have never thought politicians would bankrupt the country by continuing his policies. The first Bush actually addressed this issue by violating "read my lips" and the democrats failed to cut spending as promised but gladly accepted the new tax revenue. The Repubs have never forgottenthe first Bush lesson that taxes are easily raised, but impossible to enact ACTUAL meaningful spending cuts.

With this background, if Obama wins, the fiscal cliff and the budget ceiling wall will be very very painful!   

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:54 | 2811400 zerohedgeJUNKIE
zerohedgeJUNKIE's picture

Money doesn't grow on trees. It's printed. Now we know that government sactioned counterfeiting is legal. It's baffling how they lasted a 100 years. End Game is near.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 11:59 | 2811421 madcows
madcows's picture

100 year mortgages coming soon to a bank near you.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 12:59 | 2811477 Racer
Racer's picture

A very good video on market ticker about printing


edit: obviously someone from the Frauderal Reserve/Bwanksters given me a down tick... ha ha... won't stop the video from being seen though!

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 12:42 | 2811597 Duke of Con Dao
Duke of Con Dao's picture

that Romney camp is full of dumb jackasses... his team called the Dream Team by Brooks of the Times back in Jan. 2012

doesn't look so dreamy now... 

the minute I heard Obama's 'You didn't build that' speech I had a mash-up out the door within 24 hours....

YouTube - "Howard Roark, You Didn't Build That!" says President Obama


nothing against Bonzai but this is much harder to do compared to a Photoshop 45 minute whack-up!

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 12:48 | 2811631 kevinearick
kevinearick's picture

So, it always comes down to food; there is data and there is reality; and farmers are the ultimate insider traders, hence where we are now, with the self-fulfilling capital ag subsidy round, and drought reaching the nw.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 13:43 | 2811878 lostcause
lostcause's picture

 The ability to print money out of thin air and earn interest on it, has to be the biggest scam of all time.  Even the Mob gave you some protection for the money they took. The marriage between the government and fed has put the stake right through the heart of the middle class. Through taxes or inflation they will get thier pound of flesh.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 15:04 | 2812336 Anusocracy
Anusocracy's picture

The biggest scam of all time is government.

Most people aren't wired to understand that, which is why it is so successful.

The vast majority of the people on earth are no wiser than the typical victim of an online con.

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 14:01 | 2811972 Stuck on Zero
Stuck on Zero's picture

Berbanke could have spared all the money printing by simply hiring more liars at the BLS to churn out more birth/death models and good employment figures.


Wed, 09/19/2012 - 14:14 | 2812053 helping_friendl...
helping_friendly_book's picture

Bernanke should have refinanced every. non-deliquent, outstanding loan at 0.25% in 2008 and this crissis would have been over. That would have been 28 million mortgages refinanced to responsible  mortgagees. This would have created no moral hazard, since the only ones getting the deal would be current on their mortgage, and would have created demand because of all the cash freed up for, responsible, homeowners. 

They should have let everyone else fail.

Congress should be solving this problem; not the FRBNY!

Wed, 09/19/2012 - 14:53 | 2812272 Grand Supercycle
Grand Supercycle's picture

Due to QE3 and short covering spikes, all these daily charts are extremely overextended & significant correction expected very soon ~ SPX, NZDUSD, GBPUSD, AUDUSD, COPPER, CRUDE, GOLD, SILVER.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!