This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Guest Post: What Happens When All The Money Vanishes Into Thin Air?

Tyler Durden's picture


Submitted by Charles Hugh Smith from Of Two Minds

What Happens When All the Money Vanishes Into Thin Air?

Issuing debt and printing money do not create wealth. All they can create is a temporary illusion of wealth.

I could have written "if all the money vanishes," but that would be misleading, for all unbacked money will most certainly vanish into thin air. The only question is when, not if. Frequent contributor Harun I. explains why:

Those who fail to understand that the Status Quo is impossible to maintain will be shocked when the disintegration is undeniable. But the whole thing was perverse to begin with. Words like capitalism and meritocracy are thrown around to make people feel good when, in reality, we have never owned anything, not even ourselves.


How can we own ourselves when the very thing we use for subsistence can be cheapened or reduced to nearly nothing, not by market forces, but by central banks acting at the behest of governments? When a person does not control his labor, what is he?


I have been studying the monetary history of the world for the past few weeks. I can tell you that the second oldest profession is currency debasement. Nothing is new.


Of course, this should be no surprise, everything is cyclical. Humankind is like the trader looking for the Holy Grail. There is no perfect monetary system, there is only better and worse. And this one ranks among the worst. 


I wait patiently for people to come to the understanding that the only way for everyone to get their money would be to destroy its value completely, meaning that a loaf of bread would be a million dollars. If a small fraction of what has to be printed to keep the system afloat has caused the price spikes in energy and everything else, imagine what happens as the disintegration picks up speed.


As the exponential debt curve moves closer to the pure vertical, the rate at which debts come due will approach infinity. Of course, while this is the ultimate mathematical outcome, the reality is that the system will collapse before this point is reached. But don't think governments will throw in the towel. If history holds true the rise of a totalitarian government is just over the horizon.


Then there are those who get it right and wrong in the same breath. John Mauldin, in a KWN interview, thanked Europe for keeping the heat off the US. Mr. Mauldin apparently does not understand that our monetary policies are transferring what we do not want to the rest of the world, at least for a time, but not much more.


How many more food items be made smaller and sold at the same price? In effect this is a slow starvation of those at the margin. The 46 million American souls on food stamps will soon find their food stamps to be worthless.


Those who assert that a credit system cannot go hyper-inflationary may not have thought through the exponential effects on the relationship of the debt and productivity curves within the context of all money is debt and the only way to create money is for debt to be created. Eventually the debt curve accelerates away from the productivity curve, then the productivity curve collapses all together. Sovereign debt crises caused by governments stepping in to keep the debt system going is the last stage. Then comes the debt/currency collapse.


Even if the Fed stopped printing money, I fail to see the difference between too much money that is worth nothing, and no money at all. It's not going to matter to a starving man that a loaf of bread is $1 million and he is a dollar short, or if it's $1 and he is a dollar short.

Thank you, Harun. Many observers have addressed the key concept here, which boils down to this: paper money is an abstract representation of the real world.

This can be explained by a simple example. If there is $100 in the money supply, and $100 of goods and services to trade, then $1 will be exchanged for $1 of goods and services. If the money supply suddenly increases by $100, then the value of the existing $100 declines by half, as the money supply is now $200 and the supply of goods and services remains unchanged. Thus it now takes $2 to buy what $1 once bought in goods and services.

Holders of the currency have had half the value of their currency (what we call purchasing power) stolen by the central bank that issued the additional $100 in money supply.

Here is the primary point: issuing debt and printing money do not create wealth. All they can create is a temporary illusion of wealth.

(This is drawn from Chapter One of Resistance, Revolution, Liberation: A Model for Positive Change; you can read Chapter One for free.)

Here is another example. Let's say that a small group is stranded on a desert island that supports a handful of coconut palms. Each palm produces a limited number of coconuts each season. To facilitate trade, the group issues a currency that represents one coconut. (Lacking a printing press, they have to laboriously carve out a pattern on a rock to imprint a difficult-to-counterfeit stamp on the currency.)

This system works well, as the currency issued matches the number of coconuts harvested annually (for simplicity's sake, let's say that's 100). 100 pieces of currency are issued to match the 100 coconuts that exist in the real world. The currency (let's call it the quatloo) is an abstract representation of the goods available, i.e. the coconuts.

But then a wise-guy (i.e. the "central banker" on the island) realizes that if he prints another 100 quatloos, he and his buddies can buy up all the coconuts and fish without having created any real goods in the real world: the abstraction is used to con people out of their real coconuts.

The residents quickly catch on, and the "price" of coconuts rises to 2 quatloos. The wise-guy is addicted to the scam, and so he prints 1,000 quatloos, and then issues quatloos in denominations of 1 million.

Soon enough, each coconut costs 1 million quatloos.

Creating debt and paper money does not create real goods and services or real wealth.

As Harun observed, we have been promised trillions of dollars that can supposedly be traded for trillions of dollars in real goods and services, and buyers of bonds have been promised trillions of dollars of the same artificial exchange of paper for real goods.

Just as on the desert island, the growth of actual goods in the real world lags the growth of money, i.e. abstract representations of real goods.

The U.S. Central State (Federal government) has borrowed and squandered $6 trillion over the past four years, and the actual production of goods and services has not risen at all when adjusted for inflation. The central bank (the Federal Reserve) has expanded its balance sheet by $2 trillion, and yet all the assets it have tried to force higher are actually lower when measured in real goods such as gold, oil, wheat, etc.

It's easy to expand the money supply and difficult to expand the actual production of real goods in the real world. Expanding the money supply and issuing debt that lacks collateral is just like printing quatloos on the desert island: you can print a million quatloos but that doesn't create a single additional coconut.

If you print enough quatloos, then people will no longer accept them in exchange for coconuts. You will actually need a real coconut to exchange for fish.

This is why Greek towns are reportedly reverting to barter, the exchange of real goods for other real goods. We can anticipate that silver and gold will soon enter the barter as means of exchange that can't be counterfeited or printed by wise-guys (central bankers).

We can also anticipate the issuance of letters of credit, a practice that stretches back to the trading fairs of Medieval Europe, as described by Fernand Braudel in his three-volume history of early capitalism, The Structures of Everyday Life (Volume 1), The Wheels of Commerce (Volume 2) and The Perspective of the World (Volume 3).

Since gold was in insufficient supply, letters of credit were issued and accepted on a basis of trust. At the end of the great fairs, the letters were exchanged and payment of balances due made in gold or silver. Thus 99 coconuts could be traded for 100 dried fish via letters of credit and the balance due in gold or silver was the value of 1 dried fish--a mere 1% of the total value of goods exchanged.

This is what happens when abstract representations, i.e. "money," vanish into thin air. Alternative systems of exchanging goods and services arise: actual goods are exchanged via barter, tangible concentrations of value that cannot be counterfeited such as gold and silver are used as a means of exchange, letters of credit or equivalent are traded and settled with tangible goods or gold/silver, and eventually, a means of exchange ("money") that is backed by tangible goods in the real world that can be trusted to actually represent the value being traded might enter the market.

That which is phantom will vanish into thin air, while the real goods and services remain to be traded in the real world.


- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 04/24/2012 - 13:42 | 2370576 earleflorida
earleflorida's picture

Someone, once said not to long ago,...  

Quote [sic] ___ "From the 'Criticism of The Gotha Program."

     'Between the capitalist [USSA/ EU-Fringe?] and the Communist [China/?] society lies the period of the revolutionary [China's feigned love-affair with capitalism, and America's willingness to accommodate socialist/ fascism?]   transformation of the one into [someone prove me wrong -help me?] the other. To this corresponds a political transition period in which the state [FRB Totalitarian Control/ lost identity/  misplaced internal moral  compass?] can be nothing else but the revolutionary dictatorship of the proletariat [the 99.7%].'   

"CAPITAL" by Karl Marx c.1932 __ The Method and Call to Action __ pg355

Tue, 04/24/2012 - 15:38 | 2371184 blunderdog
blunderdog's picture

Marx's "Communist" society was a stateless utopia.  There's no example on the planet that's ever come anywhere close.  So...uh...the quote's may be interesting if you like philosophic history, but there's no "in-between" anything you can point to.  There's no "referent."  It's pretty much like the Kingdom of Heaven descended to Earth that the apocalyptic Christians are waiting for.

Fascism was predicted as "late-stage Capitalism." 

If you buy into the model, we're there now.  Marx had a lot of trouble mapping out the *how* of that "revolutionary dictatorship of the proletariat." That's why he got into politics.

If you can't beat 'em, join 'em.


Tue, 04/24/2012 - 14:13 | 2370701 My Days Are Get...
My Days Are Getting Fewer's picture

Would you pay $200.00 for a 3 foot rubber hose?

I did yesterday?  At a Napa parts store.

Why? Because, without the hose, my excavator won't work.

Why $200.00 - after all, the price for the same hose was about $100 in 2010.

Answer:  I had to have it.  And, that was the price.  Rubber up 25% in 1 year.  Metal fittings up more than that.  Napa profit margins must also be maintained.

Today, everything is in an increment of One Hundred Bucks.  Go to the pump.  Pay for 25 gallons of gas for your truck and your beer and your potato chips.  Go out to a very nice restaurant - 1 x wine bottle + 2 x great steaks +desert + tip = $100.

Unless you got a money printer in your basement, most folks are going to the poor house very fast.

Tue, 04/24/2012 - 20:01 | 2371924 Xrated
Xrated's picture

I paid $11 a SS bolt for my boat trailer the other day at Lowes
Hated to do it but I had to have them. Paper dollars are almost worthless. I feel your pain

Tue, 04/24/2012 - 23:32 | 2372320 Clowns on Acid
Clowns on Acid's picture

In NYC or Ldn = $150. A very good bottle of wine = $200.

Tue, 04/24/2012 - 14:25 | 2370758 disabledvet
disabledvet's picture

If the goal is to create an energy super-state called "the upper mid west" then the Fed can let loose with EVERY PENNY of those excess reserves...just as they did in the 70's. Indeed "what IS the problem" I ask? "wrong person wins again"? (wouldn't be a surprise if that was true...WOULD IT.)

Tue, 04/24/2012 - 14:30 | 2370777 suckerfishzilla
suckerfishzilla's picture

The debt clock shows 15 trillion. Unfunded liabilities are 61 trillion.  A total of 1.5 quadrillion in derivative instruments will be foisted onto taxpayer balance sheets courtesy of our banker buddies equals 2500% inflation + or - 1000%. We'll be alright. 

Tue, 04/24/2012 - 14:35 | 2370804 metaforge
metaforge's picture

I agree, Charlie, but don't we ZH'ers all know this already?  Tell it to the mouth breathers watching CNBC & occupying Wall St... then maybe something will change.

Tue, 04/24/2012 - 14:58 | 2370958 nuggetstoosmall
nuggetstoosmall's picture

Heres a thought, we've survived 45+ recessions/depressions since 1776. Each time because of the 1%'rs. Thousands of businesses went under millions of people lost their jobs and here we are today, doing the same old thing. "I don't give a dam what the public thinks" so says Rockifeller. So, whats it all for, running in my hamster wheel when nothing will change. We'll survive this and some will lose everything, but the sun will come up tomorrow and my master will give me my hamster food.

Tue, 04/24/2012 - 17:36 | 2371657 batushka
batushka's picture

most likely not. the hampsters have served their purpose and are usless eaters. no longer worth the resources to sustain.

Tue, 04/24/2012 - 15:09 | 2371022 tony bonn
tony bonn's picture

"a means of exchange ("money") that is backed by tangible goods in the real world that can be trusted to actually represent the value being traded ..."

charles - you know you are one of the best commentators on zh but the ugly head of economic illiteracy is rearing.

tangible goods do not necessarily make good money. only that entity which has the least declining marginal utility makes good money. which is why i heave great puke when i hear someone talking about a currency backed by a basket of goods....

i do not care to redeem my paper money for a bushel of corn, a few gallons of gasoline, and a dump truck of coal.

Tue, 04/24/2012 - 18:25 | 2371745 sensibleperson
sensibleperson's picture

In 1942 one gallon of gas was TWO dimes (90% silver), and TWO pre-1964 silver dimes can still buy one gallon of gas.  Hence stockpiling some "junk" silver, some gold, and lots of necessary items to barter as well as knowing how to grow food, hunt, trap, fish, etc.  The danger in some countries, including parts of USA is that people will take when they see someone has things to barter.  Some of those "people" will be thugs from the "Government"!  We are in for some really perilous times.

Tue, 04/24/2012 - 19:54 | 2371916 Xrated
Xrated's picture

I have alot of survival gear, but live in thugville fl.
If crap hits the fan, better load the wagon and get out of the city.
You have to survive in order to barter.

Tue, 04/24/2012 - 19:07 | 2371825 gnomon
gnomon's picture

Gold is linked to "dense energy", (our declining stores of readily available/accessible fossil fuels), in that it must be mined and processed which requires a great deal of energy.  So not only is Gold getting more scarce on a per capita basis because good ore deposits are getting harder to find, but also the cost of extracting and processing it is tightly linked to the most valuable commodity on the planet, crude oil.

That's the double whammy that gold has going for it that was not present when crude oil was much cheaper.

Tue, 04/24/2012 - 19:48 | 2371905 Xrated
Xrated's picture

What happpened to their money in the stock market?
I am worried about my 401k in the us stock market which is not ready for withdrawal yet. Were they able to cash out?

Tue, 04/24/2012 - 19:59 | 2371921 sensibleperson
sensibleperson's picture

Some people are moving to the American Redoubt - see to learn all about it.  Best blog of its type on the internet, and all the articles and information are archived.  Would that I were a lot younger!  I would leave the Northeast.

Tue, 04/24/2012 - 20:48 | 2371982 Clever Name
Clever Name's picture

I've been lurking here for a while before signing up, and really wanted my first post to be something eloquent and intelligent.

Forget that mess. Great article!

Just to get the first of these out of the way...


Stack phyzz!


Oh, and US Citizenism is ??? (What is up with that anyway?)

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!