This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Guest Post: The Wrong Answer

Tyler Durden's picture





 

Submitted by the Finance Addict

The Wrong Answer

So here’s an interesting question from American Banker.

Mind you, American Banker is an industry trade publication. It boasts that “when financial services CEOs speak, they speak to American Banker’s reporters.” AB is published by Source Media, which describes itself as “the pre-eminent provider of timely and essential market information [...] for members of the financial services community.” So it’s quite clear that those who read American Banker are likely to work for or to be in some way connected to banks.

Now here’s a snapshot of the survey results (as of 2:00am EST):

So here’s my question: if banks, themselves, do not believe that Too Big to Fail is over then why should we?

 


- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Mon, 04/09/2012 - 20:39 | Link to Comment vmromk
vmromk's picture

Ben (the Ponzi master) Bernanke,

I wish to take a monstrous shit on your bald dome, after which I wish to utilize your nicely trimmed beard to remove the shit particles from around my asshole.

If this sounds tempting, please dial 1-800-FUCK-BEN

 

 

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 20:43 | Link to Comment johnu1978
johnu1978's picture

There's going to be a whole lot more poverty before all this is over!

 

-John
Primitive Skills Classes - Wild Edible Tours
http://www.heartrootnatureconnection.com

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 20:56 | Link to Comment Vampyroteuthis ...
Vampyroteuthis infernalis's picture

Someday when things start imploding, TBTF won't matter. The cascading defaults will even overwhelm Bennies printing presses. Default bitchez!

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 21:55 | Link to Comment Peter Pan
Peter Pan's picture

There is always the risk that some day everything will fail, both big and small. At that time, we better pray that the human spirit comes up trumps otherwise no one will be around to blog the eulogy.

Tue, 04/10/2012 - 06:13 | Link to Comment Koffieshop
Koffieshop's picture

Not EVERYTHING has to fail. Just the Treasury/Fed/Primary Dealers trinity and with it all financial institutions. And that failure WILL happen because they are helping to create it.
They have proven they can delay the effect of limitless money printing. It will only make it worse when something finally cracks though.
Countries as a whole DO recover from financial meltdowns. It really won't be the the first time a national currency fails, causing by a period of barter economy.

Tue, 04/10/2012 - 08:25 | Link to Comment sessinpo
sessinpo's picture

Vampyroteuthis ...                     2329901

Someday when things start imploding, TBTF won't matter. The cascading defaults will even overwhelm Bennies printing presses. Default bitchez!

 

Comment:

I think you are correct in a sense. At some point even the largest banks will start cannibalizing each other. We've already seen it with certain institutions. They are given loans to get in overleveraged positions and the bigger banks pick up the pieces when that institution gets in trouble. Now that would be normal in a free market, however, what is occuring is that the overleveraged institution is being fed liquidity by the very banks that pick up the assets on the cheap. Coincidence? But who else would loan that money, after all they are banks and that is what they do, right? The answer, is that the bankrupt institution should have never been loaned that money and should have been forced to downsize, become more efficient and profitable.

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 21:03 | Link to Comment RafterManFMJ
RafterManFMJ's picture

I concur. I'm learning how to make stone soup. Mmmmm!

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 21:15 | Link to Comment takinthehighway
takinthehighway's picture

Soup from a stone...fancy that...

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 21:36 | Link to Comment The Big Ching-aso
The Big Ching-aso's picture

 

 

"It's easy to grin when your ship comes in and you've got the stock market beat.    But the man worthwhile, is the man who can smile, when his shorts are too tight in the seat."

Jamie Dimon Smails at the boat christening.  

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 22:24 | Link to Comment rosiescenario
rosiescenario's picture

...use turnip blood for coloring...

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 22:30 | Link to Comment NOTfromSanFrancisco
NOTfromSanFrancisco's picture

 

 

Rafter...

I love the stone soup story...I heard Captain Kangaroo read it on TV about 50 years ago...

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 21:00 | Link to Comment killallthefiat
killallthefiat's picture

Sad.  How can this comment get a +6 rating.  Is this witty and indicative of ZH readers IQ?

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 21:59 | Link to Comment Peter Pan
Peter Pan's picture

I agree that it's sad that this post gets a 6+ rating and more. I guess it's the final line that makes it half funny. Democracy doesn't always bring out the best because it's just an averaging process. After all, Greeks only invented democracy so they could all talk at the same time.

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 22:13 | Link to Comment Random_Robert
Random_Robert's picture

It is the indicative of the personal and individual rights enumerated in the First Amendment of the Constitution for the united States of America...

IQ is irrelevant - every person has a voice that deserves to be heard.

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 23:15 | Link to Comment XitSam
XitSam's picture

"... every person has a voice that deserves to be heard."

Every American has a right to speak. Only some of them have earned the privilege to be heard.

Tue, 04/10/2012 - 02:58 | Link to Comment ebworthen
ebworthen's picture

Anger.

IQ is a fine device for polite debate and equivocation, but often useless when removing corruption.

In other words, IQ and fancy talk/debate delay the actions that need to occur.

Tue, 04/10/2012 - 00:07 | Link to Comment OldPhart
OldPhart's picture

oops

Tue, 04/10/2012 - 00:07 | Link to Comment OldPhart
OldPhart's picture

The way I learned to do it was to cut the head off first and shit down the neck.

Makes the beard easier to maneuver and the chin makes a nice scraper.

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 20:37 | Link to Comment El
El's picture

If Dodd-Frank gave regulators power to allow big banks to fail, BAC would already be gone. It's dead already, but being carted around like Bernie.

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 22:29 | Link to Comment eatthebanksters
eatthebanksters's picture

As much as I am not a fan of Obama, I have to give him credit, he wanted to shut down Citi as an example.  His Treasury Secretary disobeyed a direct order from the President (with the assisitance of who else but Larry Summers).  My question is, why does Gethner still have his job?

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 23:07 | Link to Comment Real Estate Geek
Real Estate Geek's picture

Timmy still has his job because he obeyed the order from his bosses, who are also Barry's bosses.  And they didn't want Citi dead.

Tue, 04/10/2012 - 10:48 | Link to Comment citta vritti
citta vritti's picture

yet

Tue, 04/10/2012 - 04:49 | Link to Comment Benjamin Glutton
Benjamin Glutton's picture
ReaganBushDebt.org Calculation Details

According to http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/histdebt/histdebt_histo4.htm, the debt at the end of the 1980 fiscal year, on September 30th, 1980, was $907,701,000,000. On September 30th, 1981, it was $997,855,000,000. Averaging it out over the year gives a debt of $246,997,260.27 per day.

Reagan took office 112 days later on January 20th, 1981. The debt on that date could be estimated as $907,701,000,000 plus 112 x $246,997,260.27, or $935,364,693,151.

Bill Clinton was the first president to slow the rate of the accrual of debt after the current out-of-control spending began with the Borrow and Spend Republicans in 1981.

The final amount of the senior Bush debt was $4,174,218,594,232.91 (according to http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np), and Clinton became president on January 20th, 1993. Bill Clinton saw $1,553,558,144,071.73 added to the national debt during the eight years of his presidency.

However, from the start of fiscal year 1994 (7 months after Clinton became president), until the start of fiscal year 2002 (7 months after Bush took office), the amount of money paid toward interest on the existing Federal debt was $2,767,282,794,374.59 (http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/ir/ir_expense.htm).

Therefore, no amount of the national debt is attributable to Bill Clinton - his policies of higher taxes and reduced spending actually simultaneously reduced the debt and brought about the strongest economy since World War II, despite the fiscal disaster left in the wake of Reagan and the first Bush.

The debt was at $5,727,776,738,304.64 on January 19th, 2001, the last business day before George W. Bush took the office of president. The debt was at $10,628,881,485,510.23 on January 16th, 2009, the last business day before Barack H. Obama became president.

During his administration, George W. Bush
increased the national debt by $4,901,104,747,205.59
and personally approved of the creation of 46% of the entire national debt,
in only 8 years.

Starting in 2003, George W. Bush destroyed the world economy by encouraging U.S. banks to make loans to those who could not afford them, through schemes such as the "American Dream Downpayment Initiative", and through the destruction of oversight, such as lawsuits to prevent state securities laws from being enforced on Bush's watch. Once Bush's policies led to their inevitable result of economic collapse, the United States found itself in a situation where it had to take on debt in order to restore the economy.

This means that all of the money spent to restore the economy, until it is restored, is also attributable to George W. Bush.

Further, with our interest payments on the current debt at almost half a trillion dollars per year, that amount will be attributed to Borrow-And-Spend Republicanism as well.

That means that Ronald Wilson Reagan, George Herbert Walker Bush, and George Walker Bush's borrow-and-spend Republican administrations oversaw, approved, or caused to be spent, almost all of the national debt, except for as much as $935,364,693,151.00.

The current calculation on the site is based on the U.S. Treasury's published Total Public Debt Outstanding as of Friday, April 06, 2012, when the debt was $15,618,640,279,582.90. On Tuesday, September 04, 2007, the debt was $8,995,145,905,720.62.

This means that with the current national debt around $15,634,720,284,792.50, we're adding $3,951,965,616.86 per day, or $45,740.34 per second.

You can also find more information at the U.S. National Debt Clock.
Or other sites: http://www.reagandebt.com/, http://www.robertreich.org/reich/20050126.asp

Tue, 04/10/2012 - 15:24 | Link to Comment blunderdog
blunderdog's picture

   Therefore, no amount of the national debt is attributable to Bill Clinton - his policies of higher taxes and reduced spending actually simultaneously reduced the debt and brought about the strongest economy since World War II, despite the fiscal disaster left in the wake of Reagan and the first Bush.

You should drop that claim about "brought about the strongest economy since WWII."  Clinton came into power as the Internet was JUST BEGINNING to be shared with the masses, and the US dominance of the computer industry at that time provided massive economic benefit to American business.  Tax revenues went up significantly partly because of the early stages of "globalization."  He deserves ZERO credit for digital switching, the WWW, and the fact that the US was in the best position to seize the profits from labor-rate arbitrage in the mid/late 90's.

  This means that all of the money spent to restore the economy, until it is restored, is also attributable to George W. Bush.

This is flat-out bullshit.  Dubya was a lousy Prez and blew virtually everything he attempted very badly, but legislation is written by corporate lobbyists and passed by Congress.  Clinton is the one who signed Gramm–Leach–Bliley, and while Dubya certainly WOULD HAVE signed the same bill if it had been on his watch, he *definitely* doesn't deserve any more than "ambient" blame for the fact that the bankers got away with more money than exists in the world over the next decade. 

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 20:37 | Link to Comment Stax Edwards
Stax Edwards's picture

Not YET anyway

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 20:40 | Link to Comment Seasmoke
Seasmoke's picture

The Banks, Dodd and Frank should all die horrible deaths

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 21:23 | Link to Comment eddiebe
eddiebe's picture

Naw, what would even be better is if all their wealth and priveliges were taken away and they were forced to live like the people they claim to represent. I would like to see them get turned down again and again while competing for a shit job without bennies along with all the rest of us who are trying to survive the fucking mess they helped create and perpetrate.

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 22:30 | Link to Comment eatthebanksters
eatthebanksters's picture

I wannasee Barney bend Chris over and drive him around the block...

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 20:40 | Link to Comment Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

 Green on left / Red on right, when you dock!

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 20:51 | Link to Comment bingo was his name
bingo was his name's picture

It would probally be bad idea to take boating advice from the readership of zerohedge given the numerous boating accidents

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 21:04 | Link to Comment Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

 No comment.

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 22:25 | Link to Comment gtb
gtb's picture

It's not merely boating advice, it's seamanship.  "Red on right when returning from sea."

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 22:35 | Link to Comment eatthebanksters
eatthebanksters's picture

Red is Port (left), Green is Starboard (right)...when returning from high seas there is an old saying,"red right return."  On inland waterways it is the opposite...refer to 'Duttons' for further details....better yet, know how to read a chart do DR, and some form of non-electronic navigation and you should be in good shape.

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 20:40 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

The correct question is:  why does anyone accept the idea that regulators need to "let" banks fail?   This is what is wrong with the current concept of regulation today.  Regulation has been completely captured.  What we need are regulators that regulate, not coddle.

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 20:57 | Link to Comment CH1
CH1's picture

What we need are regulators that regulate

LOL... and you expect us to believe that these mythical creatures really exist?

Power ALWAYS corrupts.

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 22:38 | Link to Comment eatthebanksters
eatthebanksters's picture

Why do we need more regulations and regulators when the ones we have are useless?  Show me one prosecution od a senior exec of a TBTF bank from the housing crisis and I'll retract my statement.

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 22:01 | Link to Comment Peter Pan
Peter Pan's picture

If banks were allowed to fail then the people would do their own regulating by hanging crooked bankers.

Tue, 04/10/2012 - 00:59 | Link to Comment Esculent 69
Esculent 69's picture

You mean regulators like this? 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5NrqqK60OI

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 20:41 | Link to Comment Cursive
Cursive's picture

False premise.

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 20:52 | Link to Comment virgilcaine
virgilcaine's picture

Zirp allows the zombies to walk another day. End zirp already!

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 20:51 | Link to Comment mayhem_korner
mayhem_korner's picture

 

 

Wrong answers...like this:

Col. Jessep: We follow orders, son. We follow orders or people die. It's that simple. Are we clear?
Kaffee:
Yes, sir.
Col. Jessep:
ARE WE CLEAR?
Kaffee:
Crystal. Colonel, I just have one final question before I put Airman O'Malley and Airman Rodriguez on the stand: If you gave an order that Private Santiago wasn't to be touched, and your orders are always followed, then why would Private Santiago be in danger? Why would it be necessary to transfer him off the base? 

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 20:57 | Link to Comment UpShotKnotHoleGrable
UpShotKnotHoleGrable's picture

fuck banks

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 21:17 | Link to Comment Reese Bobby
Reese Bobby's picture

Crito, we owe a rooster to Asclepius. Please, don't forget to pay the debt.

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 22:03 | Link to Comment Peter Pan
Peter Pan's picture

And how do you propose we go about fucking the banks?

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 22:41 | Link to Comment Conrad Murray
Conrad Murray's picture

Sprayers full of tert-Butyllithium.

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 23:05 | Link to Comment IndicaTive
IndicaTive's picture

I'm afraid to even google that particular substance. But I bet it would do the job.

Tue, 04/10/2012 - 02:59 | Link to Comment ebworthen
ebworthen's picture

Broomsticks.

Preferably rough and splintery.

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 20:58 | Link to Comment Reese Bobby
Reese Bobby's picture

Um, we shouldn't...obviously.  Do you believe much that the Federal Reserve tells us?

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 21:04 | Link to Comment virgilcaine
virgilcaine's picture

I believe The Atlantic magazine cover marked the Top for a long time.  There is probably an increase in laughing out loud at Fed meetings also. They were laughing all the way into 2006-07.. ha ha ha.

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 21:04 | Link to Comment alfred b.
alfred b.'s picture

 

   Smoke and mirrors, shell games, ponzi schemes, rigged markets and fiat scams...welcome to the Fed, banking cartel and US treasury!

 

 

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 21:09 | Link to Comment Atomizer
Atomizer's picture


Modus Operandi: In order to bring in the new system, you have to destroy the old system. 

 

  • Well, you what I mean. He’s gone, and we couldn’t do nothing about it. [pause] That’s it
  • He’s gone. Uh, he’s gone. [pause] And that’s it. ?


Hope I can help pointing you into the right direction. We have a few bad people who believe systematic collapse will forge their agenda.

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 21:09 | Link to Comment cherry picker
cherry picker's picture

All I know is something is not right.  When Facebook, a supposedly succesful company with a billionare owner and money in the bank is doing an IPO, my question is why, except tp fill their own pockets with investor money.

Then the Fed prints more so Facebook can make gazzilions and everyone has a piece of the action.

This is a layman's view, I don't have the energy anymore to figure out all this crap.  I, a baby boomer, figure Ron Paul is right and so does the under 35 crowd.

Why so many others want Obama and Romney representing their interests is beyond me, for their interests and mine are opposed.  Oh sure, they sure talk a mean tale but sure as hell don't walk it.

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 21:13 | Link to Comment logicalman
logicalman's picture

I think few in here would disagree that it's about time TBTF was over.

Sooner the better.

Maybe we could even hold those assholes who are responsible for all the fraud and theft ACCOUNTABLE!

I can only dream!

Another thought does strike me, though.

TBTF can't go on forever - maybe a more accurate term is 'big enough to kick the can'

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 21:19 | Link to Comment eddiebe
eddiebe's picture

I didnt realize 'too big to fail' was supposed to be over. Gee I'm glad that it is supposed to be, I think.

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 21:24 | Link to Comment MrBoompi
MrBoompi's picture

If they did the survey among ZH readers the % of No votes would be much higher.

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 21:33 | Link to Comment buzzsaw99
buzzsaw99's picture

The question is bullshit to begin with. Regulators are a joke. Power doesn't originate with the CONgreff it is held by the bankers. Allow me to rephrase:

 

Will the bankers allow Dodd-Frank to fail?

 

YES -

NO -

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 21:44 | Link to Comment LongSoupLine
LongSoupLine's picture

 

 

CDS exposure...period.

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 21:57 | Link to Comment blunderdog
blunderdog's picture

Yeah, isn't that an amazing concept?  "Giving" regulators the "power" to let banks fail.

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 22:05 | Link to Comment francis_sawyer
francis_sawyer's picture

Don't we have 'czars' who are supposed to figure all this shit out? Or are they just paid to lick Obama's balls?

Tue, 04/10/2012 - 00:52 | Link to Comment Esculent 69
Esculent 69's picture

No. Licking his balls is a perk! And very soon they will all be teabagged. Know what I mean Vern?

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 23:02 | Link to Comment williambanzai7
williambanzai7's picture

I suspect after Lehman, the mere thought of allowing a TBTF dealer bank to fail sends the fear of God through Ben's veins.

It won't be a pretty sight next time around. People are going to get violent.

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 23:22 | Link to Comment XitSam
XitSam's picture

I aim to misbehave.

Mon, 04/09/2012 - 23:44 | Link to Comment palmereldritch
palmereldritch's picture

Moral hazard is irrelevant when the first part is a sad fucking illusion. They do hazard good though....

Tue, 04/10/2012 - 00:02 | Link to Comment OldPhart
Tue, 04/10/2012 - 07:26 | Link to Comment palmereldritch
palmereldritch's picture

Yep.  Terrorists everwhere you look.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2004/061204wolfhired.htm

[December 6, 2004]
Political analyst Al Martin, who has in the past proven accurate in getting ahead of the news curve, is reporting that Homeland Security have hired former Stasi head, the 'Silver Fox' Markus Wolf.

Martin states,

"Wolf is the man that effectively built the East German state intelligence operation’s internal directorate," Martin continues. "He turned half the population into informants. That is his specialty, is taking a population, constructing the various state divisions, mechanisms of control, in order to organize informants within the population. That is his real specialty. And that is precisely, as Primakov has intimated, why Wolf is being brought in.

Tue, 04/10/2012 - 01:42 | Link to Comment ViewfromUnderth...
ViewfromUndertheBridge's picture

'I wish to take a monstrous shit on your bald dome, after which I wish to utilize your nicely trimmed beard to remove the shit particles from around my asshole."  Keeping it classy ZHers...

Michael Lewis didn't need to go to Germany to find a country with anal fixations...

eg. "and in German folklore, as he put it, “one finds an inordinate number of texts concerned with anality. Scheisse (shit), Dreck (dirt), Mist (manure), Arsch (ass).… Folksongs, folktales, proverbs, riddles, folk speech—all attest to the Germans’ longstanding special interest in this area of human activity.”

ZH commentators are right up there...so to speak. 

http://www.vanityfair.com/business/features/2011/09/europe-201109 Lewis copped plenty of shit for these observations, made a lot of people feel uncomfortably exposed...

Tue, 04/10/2012 - 02:54 | Link to Comment jack stephan
jack stephan's picture

America just skipped court in 08, and now it's got warrants that make it worse. Simple and plain.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!