• Sprott Money
    05/26/2016 - 05:58
    How many “emergency” “secret” meetings do the central planners around the world need to have before the citizens of the respective countries begin to fully understand and take notice that something...

Hugh Hendry Makes Rare Media Appearance, Discusses Greece And Other Cheap Folding Suits

Tyler Durden's picture

Your rating: None

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Sun, 09/25/2011 - 18:57 | 1708767 lynnybee
lynnybee's picture

O.M.G. !   MY FAVORITE GUY !     ..... if i was just not so old .    

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 19:59 | 1708912 Michael
Michael's picture

You'll never be to old Lynnybee.

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 20:31 | 1708942 sqz
sqz's picture


Sun, 09/25/2011 - 20:29 | 1708972 Silver Bug
Silver Bug's picture

Wow the Globe and Mail is up to their garbage again, David Berman a so called "Journalist" writes a pure hit piece on Gold. It is laughable to say the least, and utterly filled with holes. You can see this nonsense linked:


When clowns like this start touting Gold, that is your que to get out of dodge!

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 20:39 | 1709010 DormRoom
DormRoom's picture

his main argument is that people like yourself, say you should buy gold as a hedge against risk, and a stock market crash.  But recently gold has been highly correlated with  declines in equities, and shown to be inconsistent with the aforementioned investment thesis.  So if  gold is no longer  a hedge against risk, why own it.

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 20:51 | 1709033 Spitzer
Spitzer's picture

Gold shot from 1580 to 1900 while world stock markets tumbled. It shot even higher in most other currencies and has not fallen anywhere near those levels even now.

Where you awake that week ?

Gold was up $25 the day of the flash crash on may 6th 2010.

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 21:56 | 1709150 DormRoom
DormRoom's picture

all true, but based on the assumption of the Bernanke put, ie QE infinity.  That assumption has been weakened, and we are now facing a huge prolonged deflationary period, not inflationary.  Gold--being an asset class--will depreciate, like all other asset classes during a deflationary period.


Also, Operation Twist is until June 2012, so you may not see QEx for another year.  Gold & silver will retrace to their 200 weekly DMA-- gold 1200, silver 21, and possibly a lotlower, if it is the case that their price appreciation was due to a speculative-bubble

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 22:06 | 1709164 Whalley World
Whalley World's picture

Have you heard of Exter's deflationary debt pyramid? 

And why again did gold rise from $20 to $35 in the deflationary 30's?

Mon, 09/26/2011 - 18:42 | 1713152 Diogenes
Diogenes's picture

It was manipulated. Franklin D. Roosevelt personally set the price of gold each day, and decided to peg it at $35 up from a starting point of $20.67.

He was deliberately devaluing the US dollar. Since the US was on the gold standard, this meant devaluing against gold.

The result was a flood of gold into the US Treasury from American sellers and gold miners and also foreign sellers especially as Europe ramped up into WW2.

The huge supply of gold amassed by the US between 1933 and 1945, allowed them to inflate the currency with impunity until the gold nearly ran out in 1971.

They did not run out of gold in 71, but at the rate it was leaving it would have been completely gone in another 2 or 3 years.

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 22:13 | 1709172 Dingleberry
Dingleberry's picture

Depends on if you are a trader or long termer, for whatever reason.  This appears to be about holding longer term, so I'll make a case for gold. QE or not, that isn't important. What IS important is whether or not uncle Ben will keep interest rates negative (in my view about minus 5% currently).  Lots of folk say that gold isn't a good inflation hedge because while inflation went on thru the 80' and 90's before gold started to pop, I will remind those folks (BECAUSE I WAS THERE), that you GOT PAID REAL INTEREST on your savings back then.  What do you get now? What will you get next year? How about the next???  Gold has been incredibly volatile, but as long as interest rates are this negative, gold has a much more solid floor that anything else you are putting your cash in. Everyone (including widows and orphans) are gamblers now, whether they want to be or not. The days of just stashing cash are over.

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 22:11 | 1709178 Crisismode
Crisismode's picture

Your assumptons are completely fallacious.


As are you.

Mon, 09/26/2011 - 01:59 | 1709593 ManufacturedOpinion
ManufacturedOpinion's picture

More like FELLATIOUS.  He's too busy sucking cock in the dormroom to have anything REAL to say.

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 22:19 | 1709194 reader2010
reader2010's picture

Comments like yours reflect the lack of basic understanding of gold, and the basic defnition of inflation and deflation. 

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 22:28 | 1709211 DormRoom
DormRoom's picture

all you gold bugs assume gold to be currency reserve candidate, but never talk about the high probability of SDRs (Special Drawing Rights), that likely will be rebalanced with a basket of current account surplus currencies, taking on that role.


In such a world, gold is a still a barbaric relic (has little use-value, and exchange-value).

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 23:50 | 1709345 Spitzer
Spitzer's picture

The world monetary order has gone from gold to paper back to gold now paper again. Paper produces the typical result which forces gold back into the equation again, for the 7000th year.

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 23:52 | 1709349 reader2010
reader2010's picture

Fuck their SDR or any other paper sheme. The value of gold doesn't go up or go down because it's measured in content purity and weight. Unless someone discovers a technology that can turn ocean waves into gold without any cost at all, there is no inflation in gold. For those that are too ignorant to understand this basic fact,  they think of gold measured in any fiat. That's their ignorance and illusion. Again, don't value your wealth in any meaningless fiat because the right way is to value that in troy ounces or kilos of gold. 

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 22:59 | 1709269 mfoste1
mfoste1's picture

gold isnt a hedge against risk.....its a hedge against inflation. In a deflationary environment gold gets hammered.


EDIT: i read through the rest of your post and you dont have any clue what youre talking about. You sound like youre just spewing some keynesian bs that a prof taught you.

Mon, 09/26/2011 - 01:44 | 1709560 ItsDanger
ItsDanger's picture

A large portion of gold's gains over the past number of yrs is directly due to the USD drop.  Once that has shaken out, gold will resume its climb.  But large gains may be elusive until inflation hits the #'s fed to the sheep.

Mon, 09/26/2011 - 02:07 | 1709585 ManufacturedOpinion
ManufacturedOpinion's picture

Good fucking Christ dormroom dumbfuck.  Are you really that stupid ???

Let's see ...

2007 Dow 14000, today 11000

2007 Gold 600, today 1600.

Or does 4 years (out of a 5000 year history as money) not count as "recently" to your idiotic pea-brain?

Just how much fiat are your (also stupid) parents paying for your "education" ??

Pull your fucking head out of your asshole before speaking to the grownups you idiot.

Mon, 09/26/2011 - 04:56 | 1710195 Bartanist
Bartanist's picture

Please explain gold in the years surrounding 1980? How is this different? ... this time? I go under the assumption that there are no free markets and everything is manipulated by those who have the power to create fiat. That manipulation will only go away when their power ceases. Can their power really be taken away or would they take your gold first as they have done before?

Mon, 09/26/2011 - 08:45 | 1710509 BigJim
BigJim's picture

Their manipulation relies on having PMs to manipulate with. As the supply dwindles, their paper games get harder and harder to sustain. We can argue 'when' the games will end, but not 'if'.

As for confiscation - as all money was gold, and the vast majority of citizen's money was in bank vaults, the confiscation was easily effected - the government just seized the contents of bank vaults. Different story now, bucko.

Mon, 09/26/2011 - 18:49 | 1713170 Diogenes
Diogenes's picture

Gold will become obsolete when one or more governments turns honest.

If any country had an honest currency without swindles, games or manipulation the world would flock to it. And say, to hell with gold.

For a while it looked like the swiss franc filled the bill. Before that it was the US dollar, and before that the British pound  which was remarkably stable for 100 years between the Napoleonic Wars and WW1.

The last 2 were backed by gold but that is not absolutely necessary. All that is necessary is for the currency to maintain its purchasing power.

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 20:37 | 1709000 ReallySparky
ReallySparky's picture

I think he is hot too, in that nerdy kinda way. Yup this chick digs him!

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 22:13 | 1709184 Crisismode
Crisismode's picture

He only wants women who are of his class.


Anyone with a name of ReallySparky doesn't fit that bill.



Sun, 09/25/2011 - 22:35 | 1709228 RSloane
RSloane's picture

Yup, he is definately hot.

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 21:32 | 1709117 Id fight Gandhi
Id fight Gandhi's picture

Wow deja vu. 2008 all over again.

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 19:00 | 1708768 hungrydweller
hungrydweller's picture

Sheesh.  Good thing he doesn't make many media appearances.  Get that man an avatar bag.

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 19:01 | 1708781 Spitzer
Spitzer's picture

Just another Hedgy getting his timing right. The John Paulson of 2011. He is not much of an economist, neither was Paulson.

Lets see how he does in 2014.....

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 19:13 | 1708807 HitTheFan
HitTheFan's picture

Is being an economist a factor in investment success then? Every time I look, economists are miles wide of the mark on every measure. Maybe you are an economist?

Nah, Hendry gets it: the world is bust, short the shit out of it.

And buy gold (that is my little tip, for free).

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 19:37 | 1708868 Spitzer
Spitzer's picture

Knowing something about how the economy actually works does go a long way. Warren Buffet knows nothing about economics and he would have went broke in 2008 without the bailouts. Judging by his latest moves, he will go broke anyway.

How many Austrian economists are miles wide?  Marc Faber ? Jim Rogers ?

The world was bust in 2009 and anyone who shorted the shit out of it (Mish Shedlock) got their head knocked off. For all we knew, China could have revalued the RMB and Hendry would have been down 70% rather then up 40.

And buy gold.... I agree, I wonder if Hew does. I have never heard anything Austrian come out of his mouth.

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 22:16 | 1709188 Crisismode
Crisismode's picture

Spitzer, sometimes you say things that are insightful.


Sometimes you say things that are foolish.


This time . . . .




You are wrong.

Mon, 09/26/2011 - 18:52 | 1713177 Diogenes
Diogenes's picture

Apparently if you want to be large you have to be batshit crazy and a total asshole.


Sun, 09/25/2011 - 19:22 | 1708833 snowball777
snowball777's picture

Let's see how your zooro long malarkey is in 2014....that is if the currency lasts until then. LOL

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 19:42 | 1708884 Spitzer
Spitzer's picture

Lets see what the dollar looks like in 2014.

The US has 50 billion in forex reserves. Enough to cover one months trade deficit. California is in the same shape as Greece, the only diffrence is California is the biggest state in the dollar bloc.

And they say "the USD is the least worst of the fiat currencies" hahaha.

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 21:13 | 1709076 snowball777
snowball777's picture

Lets see what the Drachma looks like in 2014.

Some other "differences":

- California has a $2T SDP to Greece's GDP of $0.3T and dropping

- California has 2X the GDP per capita of Greece

- California UE 12.1% Greece? 16.6% and climbing

- California 30yr bond yields 5.25%, Greece? 9.75%

"Same shape"? Hahaha. Have some more ouzo!


Sun, 09/25/2011 - 22:21 | 1709199 Spitzer
Spitzer's picture

The US numbers are cooked big-time compared to EuroStat yet that ^ is the best you could come up with ?


So Greece is liquidating debt, cutting spending and the ECB is raising interest rates. While Calerfornia is running up the US trade deficit, increasing spending and adding debt while the FED cuts interest rates.

Greece and the Euro are miles ahead of the Cali and the dollar.


Mon, 09/26/2011 - 01:30 | 1709540 snowball777
snowball777's picture

"Raising" huh?

Jan. 1.00 2.00 - 3.00

Jul. 0.75 1.50 - 2.25

"Increasing spending" huh?

2009 $446B

2010 $403B

2011 $404B

"Liquidating debt" huh?

"Greece’s debt is forecast to peak at 161 percent of gross domestic product next year, according to European Commission data released on July 4.

Venizelos said the economy will shrink more than 4.5 percent this year."

You're a funny guy, Spitz. I'll give you that much.

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 19:01 | 1708782 DormRoom
DormRoom's picture

Hugh, "I shorted your grandchildren's future" Hendry.  His fund is up 40% yoy, from his Chinese CDS plays.  But you shouldn't short a country that has more PHds working in its federal government, particularly the finance dept, than most of the world combine.

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 19:28 | 1708845 snowball777
snowball777's picture

"Piled higher and deeper", as they say in academia.

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 19:36 | 1708866 agent default
agent default's picture

"But you shouldn't short a country that has more PHds working in its federal government, particularly the finance dept, than most of the world combine."

No, that's exactly the thing you want to short the hell out of.  It is the country that is run by people who had to run a small business that you DO NOT want to short.  An elusive entity these days unfortunately.

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 19:40 | 1708877 snowball777
snowball777's picture

Because everyone knows huge economies are exactly like selling retail goods at a mark-up, performing a well-defined service for a small set of customers, or doing ridiculously simple books with Quicken.


Mon, 09/26/2011 - 06:06 | 1710269 DrunkenMonkey
DrunkenMonkey's picture

You miss the point that as they are closer to their customers, they understand human nature / behaviour better.

Mon, 09/26/2011 - 09:52 | 1710886 snowball777
snowball777's picture

No, I get that, it's the applicability of that knowledge beyond their tiny sphere of influence that makes the logic completely flawed. And there's more to human behavior than business (although not for many small business owners).

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 21:49 | 1709138 bankruptcylawyer
bankruptcylawyer's picture

he's trying to say jim chanos is smarter shorting china or other brics in a strategic manner than the  mohammed el arian, oh i'm sorry bill gross, is shorting treasuries. 


and.........i think he was right. 


he's talking about shorting bonds when he says countries ....NOT .....equities per se. dummy. 


and he's been right. because developing countries alrready printed their way into this mess and are now paying for it ( russia, argentina, mexico---yes they ALL had inflation crisis in the past 10 years)----brazil might be different, but the phd countries of the u.s. and germany ---their yields have only gone down. 

and i think he's correct in saying they will continue to print ( yields go down ) their debt (treasuries) into becoming equities ( cash money supply yielding zero perpetually)

( bonds yielding zero percent indefinitley are dollars---and if you think of the money supply as the main asset of the central bank, then cash is the equity side of the asset and bonds the debt side. , of course precious meetals would be the negative interest side of the asset  unless you could figure out a way to make the metals pay you interest (enough to cover cost of warehousing plus  interest profit--- by lending them out multiple times to CME primary dealer warehouses that will then financialize them in a paper confetti market 99% never delivered ( futures.) ---- ) . 

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 22:08 | 1709171 1984
1984's picture

>"But you shouldn't short a country that has more PHds working in its federal government, particularly the finance dept, than most of the world combine."

>>No, that's exactly the thing you want to short the hell out of.  It is the country that is run by people who had to run a small business that you DO NOT want to short.  An elusive entity these days unfortunately.


Bbbbzzzzz!  All wrong.


But you shouldn't short a country that has more PEOPLE working in its government, particularly the finance dept, than most of the world combined.


There.  Fixed it for you.

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 20:49 | 1709031 Wannabee
Wannabee's picture

PhD's ???

Ask LTCM how the PhD's worked out for 'em.


Sun, 09/25/2011 - 21:51 | 1709143 chindit13
chindit13's picture

Don't confuse PhDs with Nobel Prize winners.  It's an easy mistake to make.  The first are merely conventional weapons, though if attacking en masse, can do a good deal of damage.  The second, though limited to a yearly production of two or three, are truly weapons of mass destruction.

LTCM had both.  They were simply too much to overcome, even for a tough guy raised on the south side of Chicago like John Meriwether.

Sun, 09/25/2011 - 22:18 | 1709193 Crisismode
Crisismode's picture

Having a PHd. is simply a matter of proving what a fool you were with the years at your disposal.


You WASTED them.

Mon, 09/26/2011 - 00:28 | 1709449 Not For Reuse
Not For Reuse's picture

don't have one myself, but sorry to hear you equate intensive study with wasted time. I know it must be shocking to realize that some people care more about learning than they do about making money

Mon, 09/26/2011 - 02:10 | 1709634 ManufacturedOpinion
ManufacturedOpinion's picture

Learning WHAT ???

How to spout keynesian poopoo drivel out of your mouth ??

Seems like a COMPLETE waste of time to me.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!