This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Iran To Israel: "We'll Show You Hell"

Tyler Durden's picture




 

While we are looking for the full IAEA report blasting Iran and specifically its nuclear program, claiming that Iran carried out work relevant for developing nuclear arms according to a UN report citing 'credible' info, as well as having information of activities in Iran specific to nuclear weapons, we already know what Iran's response is to any potential 'provocations' from Israel. To wit: "We'll show you 'hell'" UPI explains: "Israel will learn the true meaning of "hell" if it decides a military strike against Iran is worth the risk, an Iranian national security official said. Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is said to have been reviewing strike plans against Iran's nuclear infrastructure as the International Atomic Energy Agency expressed concerns about Tehran's nuclear ambitions. Iranian officials have said any attack on its nuclear infrastructure would be suicidal." And the soundbites keep getting better: "If a military challenge is started against Iran in the region, the Zionist regime will definitely be faced with a hell," Javad Jahangirzadeh, a lawmaker on Iran's national security commission, told the semiofficial Fars News Agency." Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak, in a Tuesday interview with Israel Radio, said Israel doesn't want war. If dragged into conflict, he said, the casualties would be low. "Israel is the strongest country in the region and it will stay that way," he added." And while a few weeks or even days ago, the outcome of this event would have been easily predictable, following the just announced "microphone" gaffe involving Sarkozy, Obama and Netanyahu, suddenly the odds are far more interesting. Regardless, at this point, aside from concluding that Keynesians everywhere must be rejoicing at the imminent GDP boost driven by the military-industrial complex, we can also venture to gamble: short glass manufacturers. In a few months there may be a natural glut.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:03 | 1857125 Smithovsky
Smithovsky's picture

bomb bomb bomb bomb bomb iran

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-zoPgv_nYg

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:09 | 1857138 SheepDog-One
SheepDog-One's picture

Yea but where? Over 80 'possible nuclear sites' all over Iran North South East and West. 

Really....this question gets 'thumbs down'? Why, because you cant answer the simple question? WHERE are you going to 'bomb'?

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:09 | 1857171 wanklord
wanklord's picture

The only way Barry & Associates (including the Zionist warmongers) can justify a war against the Islamic Republic of Iran is by staging another false flag attack on continental United States: most likely a controlled nuclear explosion (dirty bomb) targeting a major urban concentration that may kill dozens of thousands of civilians. 

This operation will be carried out by the CIA in partnership with Mossad and MI6 to subsequently be blamed on AlQaeda working in conjunction with elements of Iran's IRGC and Pakistan's ISI.

Besides that, Americans are a bunch of stupid animals easy to manipulate and subdue. The psychological impact of this event will elicit the brute and ignorant populace to demand a massive retaliation against the alleged perpetrators (explicitly Iran); the Obama administration will need the unconditional support of these mules in order to further their agenda.

Absent of this essential prerequisite (a false flag operation), President Soetoro won't be able to persuade US Congress to issue a formal declaration of war.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:12 | 1857193 SheepDog-One
SheepDog-One's picture

EXACTLY right Wankelord.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 16:42 | 1858092 gmrpeabody
gmrpeabody's picture

Did I miss the tin foil sale at Costco?

Too funny...

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:35 | 1858331 phyuckyiu
phyuckyiu's picture

Actually Peabody you missed your critical thinking class, but it's ok, most blew off the class with you. I love how all the people who want to bomb Iran have no idea how we are going to survive 10$ gas as a nation, nor how Europe will survive 20$ gas. Their ignorance of how small the Straits of Hormuz is definitely showing.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:43 | 1858368 The Big Ching-aso
The Big Ching-aso's picture

You know we can always nuke the Straits to be a lot wider if we needed to.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 18:58 | 1858638 phyuckyiu
phyuckyiu's picture

I needed some humor in this thread, thx for that :)

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 22:30 | 1859332 cranky-old-geezer
cranky-old-geezer's picture

 

 

If America / Israel / NATO (North Atlantic Terror Organization) bomb / attack / invade Iran, we can all plan on WWIII.

And it'll be all nuclear.  Rothschilds / Bilderburgs / etc get their wish, reducing world population a few billion.

Have a nice day.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 23:03 | 1859431 MayIMommaDogFac...
MayIMommaDogFace2theBananaPatch's picture

persuade US Congress to issue a formal declaration of war.

Formal declaration of war...I remember when they used to do that.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:43 | 1858371 gmrpeabody
gmrpeabody's picture

Never said I was in favor of bombing anybody...,

only that I am not in the school of those who believe the US/CIA/FBI attacked us on 911.

And since you seem interested, I am SO stupid, that I actually believe we send people to the moon and back. Can you believe it? I don't recall even being offered a class in critical thinking though, and that may have something to do with it. We obviously went to different schools together.

I will strive to be as thoughtful and intelligent as yourself.., cross my heart.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:54 | 1858416 DaveyJones
DaveyJones's picture

you're right, the FBI was clearly pushed out of the loop (Dick's orders)

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 19:16 | 1858607 phyuckyiu
phyuckyiu's picture

The bombing comment wasn't directed at you, hence the word 'their' instead of 'your'. Also, because someone has a hard time questioning their beliefs on how the world works doesn't make them stupid, nor would I ever call you that. I would never claim i'm superior to you either, but your anger proves you'll never think outside your box. Not sure what the moon shot has to do with anything, other than try to claim i'm a conspiracy theorist. I'm sorry you are so ignorant to believe the U.S. and Israel don't plan false flags. Since the Gulf of Tonkin was proved to be fake, and the Six Day War was started based on 'reliable intelligence', enjoy your ignorance (ignorance is not stupidity, to clarify again). Thanks for the attempted insults though, but I have no superiority complex, so this doesn't really insult me.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 19:09 | 1858695 d_senti
d_senti's picture

I don't believe the US govt carried out 9/11 either (though I appear to be in the minority on ZH here), but I certainly wouldn't put it past our government to do such a thing. Nor do I discount the possibility that it's true. I just haven't been convinced, even though there are obviously discrepencies in the official story.

I don't think the above prediction is right, but I'm glad it's been made, honestly. If it does actually happen, then I would consider it fairly strong evidence of govt involvement and of that particular viewpoint as a whole. I've bashed conspiratorial thinking on this site before, but it's the trend in thinking that bothers me, not the possibility of conspiracy. Many seem to fall into the camp because they have lost all trust in government - and rightly so - but knowing they could and knowing they did are two different things. So long as one believes it from strong evidence, I'm perfectly open to the idea.

Some people here on ZH predicted the possibility of an imminent domestic terrorist attack as a cover for a crackdown on certain anti-governmental groups. Sure enough, not 5 days later, there were four senior citizens (!) arrested for plotting a terrorist attack. I found that quite fishy.

Many people seem convinced of recent/future false flag attacks because it plays so well into the agenda of certain interests in power today. Nevertheless, I don't think they NEED false flag attacks to execute their interests. As there are really hundreds of millions of people who hate the US, at most they would have to simply let security "slip up" in a certain case to get what they want.

The US, China, and Russia (et al.) are all playing at a new type of subversive warfare. We play various interests against our frenemies in such a way that we can't be found directly guilty of wrongdoing. Russia, for instance, helped train al-qaeda top brass, funneled weapons into iraq/afghanistan through other channels, an are directly aiding the construction of nuclear facilities in Iran. Meanwhile the US has aided, supplied, and militarily supported Israel for its own purposes in the same area.

It's not a proxy war, exactly, rather the next level beyond that. I don't believe there is one monolithic, controlling power at the top orchestrating events; I see a few competing groups striking each other via 4th/5th generational warfare tactics. I think that's where terrorist operations in the US come into play and what has driven various recent events in the middle east. But I could be wrong.

And I don't think you're stupid for not agreeing, naturally. Just my two cents.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 16:49 | 1858127 TheFourthStooge-ing
TheFourthStooge-ing's picture

I think that wanklord's thesis is certainly plausible, perhaps even probable.

For the sake of accuracy, and I hope I'm not being too pedantic, I'd like to point out that a so-called dirty bomb does not entail any kind of nuclear explosion. Rather, it employs a conventional charge to scatter radioactive contaminants. In essence, the hydrogen explosions at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant were dirty bombs, in that the explosive force came from the deflagration/detonation of a mixture of hydrogen and oxygen.

 

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:42 | 1858366 randomdrift
randomdrift's picture

That is one source of very small radioactive particles floating in the atmosphere.  The chemtrails determine where they will fall to earth.

I went out and measured radiation levels around the Olympic Peninsula WA. It is very significantly higher where they do heavy chemtrail spraying.  It doesn't really matter whether the chemtrails cause clouds to form and the rain brings the particles down or whether they are spraying the particles themselves, for it comes to the same thing.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 20:22 | 1858915 Nadaclue
Nadaclue's picture

Here is a site you may or may not be aware of. Just a bunch of private citizens who purchased radiation monitors and hooked into a real time net display. It auto updates itself each minute. Sometimes monitors go offline for whatever reason. It also sounds an audible alert if the count per minute goes to >99

http://www.radiationnetwork.com/

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:14 | 1857207 redpill
redpill's picture

Since when does he need a declaration of war?  It will just be some "kinetic military action" that will be over in "days, not weeks."

 

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:24 | 1857279 Carlyle Groupie
Carlyle Groupie's picture

Israel attacking Iran is the real Pandora's Box.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 15:04 | 1857570 JoeSexPack
JoeSexPack's picture

I've met Pandora, & her box is much nicer than that.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 15:41 | 1857777 Michael
Michael's picture

I hope when this WWIII thing gets started, the Chinese use their kinetic energy space weapons to destroy the entire space satellite and communication systems rendering satellite space unusable for decades. 

China’s Anti-Satellite Weapon Test

 http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RS22652.pdf

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 15:53 | 1857835 Dr. Acula
Dr. Acula's picture

Fine, but will I still be able to check facebook every 5 minutes?

 

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 16:49 | 1858126 Precious
Precious's picture

No government would risk shutting down the internet because everyone would go outside and pitch tents in front of the ATT or Verizon store.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:06 | 1858187 HungrySeagull
HungrySeagull's picture

Actually I think the Sonnets and other very high level large internet hubs are quite valid in war. Take them out and you darken alot of information.

 

Hell, the Net was designed to provide a sort of a nigger-rigged survivable communications in event of all out nuclear exchange with the USSR.

 

As far as the bombs, just need a bunch of those very ultra deep penetrators I have heard of from time to time from Boeing. Little snippets like production was being started last year and things like that. They really should keep that stuff secret until ready for use.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 20:30 | 1858944 Umh
Umh's picture

The Internet protocols are designed to be surviable. Governments desires to funnel everything through checkpoints defeats the design of the protocols:)

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:05 | 1858191 peekcrackers
peekcrackers's picture

You met her asian sister Panwhora

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:15 | 1857217 Larry Darrell
Larry Darrell's picture

When was the last time the US Congress issued a formal declaration of war???

 

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:18 | 1857243 john39
john39's picture

yeah, according to obummer's constitutional scholars, it would just be a "kinetic" action, so... all good. /s

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:22 | 1857266 DaveyJones
DaveyJones's picture

or did anything constructive

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:44 | 1857416 farmerjohn2112
farmerjohn2112's picture

5 June 1942

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 15:32 | 1857710 disabledvet
disabledvet's picture

A what? I thought all we had to do was tell the guy "it's time to go"? that's declaratory...

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 15:55 | 1857854 Mark701
Mark701's picture

Good question. I'm thinking WW II.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:17 | 1857237 j0nx
j0nx's picture

Puhleeze. I know of nobody that would believe any kind of attack on America would be Iran's fault. Pull the other one. People are a LOT wiser to the scams of the oligarchs these days than they ever were. They pushed their fraud and scams too far and woke the sleeping masses and now nobody trusts their government. The American people simply won't stand for another war with a country that did nothing to us. I venture to say that a lot of soldiers would tell them to go shit in their hat too after just coming home from 10 years of unending wars against 'foes' with little to no proof that they were ever really our foe to begin with.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:23 | 1857274 Abitdodgie
Abitdodgie's picture

The Amerikan people will go to war with Iran at the drop of a hat why ,the wars never bother American citizens (dancing with the stars is never stoped) 2 most Americans think Iran has Nukes, 3 the rest are just so stupid they dont't care ,as you see from the first comment on this page.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:49 | 1857452 Woodyg
Woodyg's picture

4. Hey i think al queada is being financed by Iran........

5. Take the heat off of israel - an aparthied state committing crimes according to the Geneva Convention -

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:59 | 1857536 Woodyg
Woodyg's picture

4. Hey i think al queada is being financed by Iran........

5. Take the heat off of israel - an aparthied state committing crimes according to the Geneva Convention -

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 15:31 | 1857706 Smithovsky
Smithovsky's picture

That was making fun of an idiot who came very close to becoming a US president but hey, feel free to read into it whatever you like.  

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:07 | 1858203 HungrySeagull
HungrySeagull's picture

We have been at war since those Marines got blown up in Beruit and no one did a goddamn thing.

 

Fallujah was revenge best served fast and hard.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:24 | 1858309 Rick64
Rick64's picture

Why were we in Beruit? I am not condoning the killing of marines, but we shouldn't have been there in the first place.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 22:53 | 1859405 Hi Ho Silver
Hi Ho Silver's picture

Why is a matter of conjecture.  What we were doing there was saving Arafat's ass, when we should have been killing the filthy bastard and his cohorts.

Wed, 11/09/2011 - 07:10 | 1859982 Rick64
Rick64's picture

Not even close.

Wed, 11/09/2011 - 08:05 | 1860043 i-dog
i-dog's picture

Very much closer than you could know. Arafat was the son of the Mufti of Jerusalem and had at least 9 private audiences with the Pope. He was an integral part of Rome's plans to regain Jerusalem and therefore a protected son of the CIA.

Wed, 11/09/2011 - 15:33 | 1862420 Rick64
Rick64's picture

I would surmise that you adhere to the Vatican Assassins ideology ( I don't).  I know the Vatican has a lot of power and influence, but are you suggesting that they pulled the strings to have U.S. Marines protect Arafat? If they had this much power then why didn't they just stop the IDF from attacking through U.S. coercion. When Palestine was under British Mandate wouldn't it have been much easier for the Vatican to gain control? When Jerusalem and the West Bank were occupied by Jordan wouldn't that have been an opportune time too? I don't doubt the Vatican's attempts to control Jerusalem, but they seemed to have failed miserably which doesn't add up if they are controlling the world.

 Regardless the marines or any military shouldn't be put in harms way unless the U.S. is directly threatened or attacked.

Wed, 11/09/2011 - 19:44 | 1863571 i-dog
i-dog's picture

"I would surmise that you adhere to the Vatican Assassins ideology"

I don't "adhere" to any ideology. I take in all points of view, do my own research, and attempt to connect the dots. Phelps provides a lot of useful research, but is also blinded by his own religion into seeing connections that raise contradictions. His overall thesis is, however, sound and provides a better fit to events than does conventional "It's the Joos! ... No, it's the bankers! ... No, it's the Catholics!" of mainstream debate.

"are you suggesting that they pulled the strings to have U.S. Marines protect Arafat?"

It's more complex than that. They don't micro-manage individual events from a central "war room"!

Rather, they provide and support an intellectual and political framework that includes very influential plants in all areas of government and industry who are working towards the Luciferian ideology of a global super-state ... but each with their own view of what would be "helpful" or "expected".

This means that sometimes one arm is unwittingly working against another to create "unintended consequences". It should also be recognised that even the Vatican itself has opposing factions struggling for control at every turn and within each generation.

That's why they have not achieved overall success in well over 500 years of attempting to stifle freedom ... and will continue to fail, IMO. The current fiasco in Europe is just one example of their failures.

As to your specific tactical questions, I could write a book on each of them. Let's just say thet contrived "problem" and contrived "reaction" don't always result in the expected contrived "solution"!

Central planning doesn't work but they'll still keep trying.

Wed, 11/09/2011 - 20:06 | 1863752 Rick64
Rick64's picture

 Thanks for the clarifications. Glad I'm not the only one that sees the contradictions in Phelps connections.  I am not convinced that the NWO is of the Luciferian ideology, but I haven't really researched it extensively.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:18 | 1858225 Rick64
Rick64's picture

 I think society is being conditioned by the gov. and media to see Iran as evil just as Saddam was ( I know its obvious). The Iraqi war was a long time in the making and this one is too. By the time we go to war with Iran the economy will be so bad that many will join the military just to have a job.  The U.S. has to get control of as much oil as possible to ensure the reserve currency status as well as squeezing out Russian and Chinese control and influence.  Whoever controls the worlds oil, will control the economies of the world including their monetary systems. If Iran acquires nuclear weapons that would be a game changer that the U.S. can't allow.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:25 | 1857285 Troll Magnet
Troll Magnet's picture

I wish you were right but you're wrong.  If Americans were awake, Ron Paul would be running away with the GOP nomination by now.  We're still asleep.  We might be in a coma.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:05 | 1858188 lolmao500
lolmao500's picture

As the saying goes, the louder a dog bark, the smaller he is.

Iran is a weak country, to make up for it, they scream... they are trying to bluff us, but if you take a close look at the Iranian military, you would know that NATO would have total air superiority within a few days, easy.

Now if you though of invading... that would go like Iraq.

If you thought of OCCUPYING... now that's suicide.

Occupying is the only way (aside from regime change) to make sure they never get nukes.

But just bombing them (just like Osirak) will make sure they get nukes...

If you remember Iraq post-Osirak... before Osirak, they had something like 700 scientists working on a program... and they would be able to do 1 bomb every year... and they had a budget of $400 million.

After the strike : team of 8000+ scientists. Aiming for 6 bombs a year. Budget of $10 billion.

 

So go ahead Israel, bomb Iran and see what happens.

Wed, 11/09/2011 - 01:59 | 1859740 UP Forester
UP Forester's picture

Don't forget all the Russian nuke scientists at the Iranian sites.  Or the former Soviet chemical and biological scientists Iran picked up for a song after the 'Stans broke off and they were hungry.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 22:54 | 1859407 Hi Ho Silver
Hi Ho Silver's picture

Zombie Amerika

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:51 | 1857464 Sokhmate
Sokhmate's picture

Amen. I hope 'merikens have is awoken to the old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:47 | 1858389 moonstears
moonstears's picture

Sok...now there was a great prez, thanks for the memories of ole GW! /sarc

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 15:05 | 1857579 Saxxon
Saxxon's picture

I respectfully disagree; look at the person to the left and right of you.  Unless you live in one of the relatively enlightened pockets of the U.S.A., you are looking at a television addict (4+ hours a day, more than I watch in a month) who cannot find the countries in question on a map; and who is growing increasingly frustrated in general.

All they have to do is steer that.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 15:52 | 1857831 Oh regional Indian
Oh regional Indian's picture

Well said Saxxon. All they need to do is control the flow of the angst. After stoking it obviously.

ORI

Paying Attention

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:19 | 1857247 Deadpool
Deadpool's picture

my guess is it'd be on the Mexican border. Any thoughts on where?

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:24 | 1857280 francis_the_won...
francis_the_wonder_hamster's picture

"my guess is it'd be on the Mexican border."

Don't say that!  Real estate prices here in San Diego are just now starting to stabilize and now you want to put a big bullseye on us?

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:32 | 1857339 Deadpool
Deadpool's picture

sorry border town, but if you look at the U.S. it's the only hot spot that makes sense. Remember the whole telegraph that Iran was using Mexican drug gangs to assassinate the Saudi ambassador. However, the border is long so it could happen in TX, AZ, NM or CA...CA wouldn't lose O any votes so it's my #1 odds on favorite.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:47 | 1857438 Dixie Rect
Dixie Rect's picture

I wouldn't worry, San Diego, because when Mexico invades, they are going to rename you "Tiajuana Heights", should be good for a RE boost

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:55 | 1857514 Troll Magnet
Troll Magnet's picture

LoL

As if "San Diego" needs to be renamed...

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 15:01 | 1857526 Troll Magnet
Troll Magnet's picture

But Tijuana does sound a lot more enticing than San Diego. 

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 15:51 | 1857829 Bolweevil
Bolweevil's picture

hee-haw, hee-haw

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 23:18 | 1859465 MayIMommaDogFac...
MayIMommaDogFace2theBananaPatch's picture

You haven't been to Tijuana have you?

edit: Bolwevil clearly has visited though...

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:09 | 1858207 HungrySeagull
HungrySeagull's picture

You already have a gigantic bulls eye on your west coast for a variety of reasons.

 

Screw the property values, relocate east and enjoy greater freedom and lower taxes along with a reduced threat of problems.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:42 | 1857401 seek
seek's picture

It'd need to be a big enough and recognizable enough, so maybe El Paso, TX, Noglaes or Tucson, AZ, or San Diego?

My guess is they'd pass on SD because there's too much military presence and it's too valuable. There are radiological scanners at the main border entry points, so it needs to be a plausible fence jump. Feds like Cali, too. They hate AZ and TX, so that'd be my bet, unless they want to go the "it could happen to you" route and nail the heartland, like Sioux City, Iowa.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 15:35 | 1857737 GFKjunior
GFKjunior's picture

I used to live on the border and my guess is definetly Texas or Arizona. El Paso has the second largest military base in the world so my guess is one of those small mexican border towns where mass drug smuggling happens.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 16:54 | 1858146 i-dog
i-dog's picture

TPTB are not going to interfere with their main cash cow: tax-free profits from drug trafficking into the US, particularly over the Mexican border! You're probably also unaware that the flow of both drugs and Mexicans into the US border states is aided and abetted by DC!?

Nope ... the bad news will be for Detroit....

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:43 | 1858369 Things that go bump
Things that go bump's picture

You know, I was going to reply to you.  I had it all written, but then I figured someone would soon be coming in the night to drag my ass off for some nice political rehabilitation and maybe not just me alone, but my near and dear as well, so I decided to shut my trap.  I find myself doing that a lot lately. I don't think I'm having a psychotic break with late onset paranoia either. "By the pricking of my thumbs..." 

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 20:06 | 1858871 sheeple2012
sheeple2012's picture

-1Trillion for the Chaim Witz picture

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 20:20 | 1858906 Things that go bump
Things that go bump's picture

I think I'll keep him anyway.  

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:10 | 1858213 HungrySeagull
HungrySeagull's picture

It will be along there probably Nogales most of all. Then Laredo.

 

Eagle Pass is just too quiet and Yuma has the Marines in the area.

 

Anything else is just too far to walk in any weather without water. You cannot carry enough to stay alive to cover the distance required to reach good ground.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:49 | 1857427 DarthVaderMentor
DarthVaderMentor's picture

If it was instigated by the current administration, it would be Alabama, Missisippi or the Florida Panhandle. Fallout would then go over SC, GA and lower NC. Less protected beaches and ports for entry, coastal states to make it look like a logical and viable attack from Iran. There are big concentrations of Arabs and Mexican illegals down in those states. 

 

This would have the additional effect of killing the most Republican electoral college hopes and best chances of inciting war mania among the remaining conservatives. 

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 15:22 | 1857652 hivekiller
hivekiller's picture

I thought it might be Chicago. You've got a former IDF member as Mayor and Lucky Larry Silverstein bought the Sears Tower.  If it worked once, it will work again. Americans never learn.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 22:56 | 1859413 bigkahuna
bigkahuna's picture

THe Chicago false flag would also hit the "it could happen to you" thread as well. I believe it will be DC or Chicago. What a better way to sweep the republic aside and install a dictator than to waste DC.

Wed, 11/09/2011 - 15:45 | 1862516 hivekiller
hivekiller's picture

You could be right about DC. Then the UN could take us over - all for our own protection of course and to protect us against those 'evil terrorist'.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:31 | 1857336 William113
William113's picture

Detroit, they will kill Blacks and Muslims and then make it look like Iran did it. I'll bet 500 on it.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:37 | 1857376 Deadpool
Deadpool's picture

them's registered Democrats - Acorn division. Can't reduce their numbers.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:50 | 1857454 mick_richfield
mick_richfield's picture

Why not?  In Chicago they still vote after they die.  Why not Motown?

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 16:03 | 1857864 Dr. Acula
Dr. Acula's picture

How could you even tell if a nuclear disaster struck Detroit?

 

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 16:56 | 1858153 azzhatter
azzhatter's picture

I resent that comment. 

Dave Bing

 

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:59 | 1858434 DaveyJones
DaveyJones's picture

the house prices would go up

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 18:52 | 1858612 SilverRhino
SilverRhino's picture

Instead of wreckage you'd see the foundations of the houses.

 

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 20:54 | 1859010 msamour
msamour's picture

I bet if you sent a journalist that has never been to Detroit and tell them a nuclear bomb fell on the city they'd believe you. LMAO!

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 23:33 | 1859495 MayIMommaDogFac...
MayIMommaDogFace2theBananaPatch's picture

ouch! <lulz>

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:11 | 1858220 HungrySeagull
HungrySeagull's picture

Detroit will make a fine training ground for Hell in the city.

 

Hate to say it but the smart ones have fled the place already.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 23:05 | 1859438 Hi Ho Silver
Hi Ho Silver's picture

I think I see an oppourtunity.  Buy a few houses for a couple of hundred dollars and offer them as timeshare for SHTF preparedness training.  Two week rental includes: no power, no running water, 6 gallons of drinking water, 1 case of canned cat food, and a broken can opener.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:59 | 1857541 kalasend
kalasend's picture

Fuck your mother. You've got too much time.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 15:15 | 1857633 Free Markets
Free Markets's picture

So are you also saying 9/11 was a setup? Do you really believe Ahmadinejad loves americans?  I am not saying to go bomb them, but I would not trust that government either.  He is the same guy that questioned wether the Holocaust ever happened.  Was that a setup too?  I could see him wanting to usher in the return of the Mahdi and really wanting to nuke Isreal.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 15:31 | 1857699 whstlblwr
whstlblwr's picture

Ahmadinejad hates the Jewish people. Long histroy of antisemitism in Iran, "Land of the Aryans." Hating jews is different than nuking of the planet. Way for us to fight anti semitism and hate is help each other out, not fight with guns.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 16:02 | 1857891 Dr. Acula
Dr. Acula's picture

>Ahmadinejad hates the Jewish people.

I'm not so sure. Ahmadinejad is ethnically Jewish (his parents were Jews). Maybe he just hates Zionism?

 

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 16:14 | 1857954 whstlblwr
whstlblwr's picture

Even idiots allowed to post on ZH. The father, Ahmad religious Shia, but low class, so probably jealous of the smart attractive Jew.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 16:27 | 1858005 Dr. Acula
Dr. Acula's picture

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/6256173/Mahmoud-Ahmadinejad-revealed-to-have-Jewish-past.html

"The short note scrawled on the card suggests his family changed its name to Ahmadinejad when they converted to embrace Islam after his birth. The Sabourjians traditionally hail from Aradan, Mr Ahmadinejad's birthplace, and the name derives from "weaver of the Sabour", the name for the Jewish Tallit shawl in Persia. The name is even on the list of reserved names for Iranian Jews compiled by Iran's Ministry of the Interior."

 

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:21 | 1858056 whstlblwr
whstlblwr's picture

Interesting, I didn't know. If true,could see how family might compensate for hatred of Jew. He is raised religious Shia, no Jewish past for him.

And wrong statement to say parents ethnically Jewish. Only father maybe. Mother is descent from Islam's prophet Muhammad

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:41 | 1858324 moonstears
moonstears's picture

Don't get defeated so quickly there, whstblwr...see http://www.newser.com/story/70994/ahmadinejad-is-not-jewish.html . Just to add to the pissing, though, I'll mention, I once read,  Hitler's poor ole Granmama, who's town and grave he razed, in Austria, but not the town's older historical documents, well, Granmama came from "Solomon's",thus so did little Adolf. Figure that one out, bitchez!

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:12 | 1858228 HungrySeagull
HungrySeagull's picture

Actually Iran is a great Persian Empire. A-boy is just a thuggie boss.

 

Off him with a good hit and the rest of the cronies will scatter like roaches.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 15:39 | 1857762 hivekiller
hivekiller's picture

He questioned the holocau$$t because it's nothing but a lie and racket.

 

Now let's talk about the 20 to 60 million people that Jews did murder when they ran the Soviet Union.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 15:43 | 1857790 whstlblwr
whstlblwr's picture

Yeah right, how about the pogroms that murdered Jews. That's why all the Jews try to leave because they rule Soviet Union? Stupid fuck head, go back to school.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 16:04 | 1857904 Clay Hill
Clay Hill's picture

"Genrikh Yagoda"

 

Don't choke on your whistle, Bitch.

 

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 16:20 | 1857975 whstlblwr
whstlblwr's picture

One man? Born from a religion? Looks like he not practicing Jew, but evil comes in all religions. Stupid fucktard. Look at pedophile in our church.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 16:43 | 1858100 Clay Hill
Clay Hill's picture

" one man"?  Sorry, NO.

More like his deputies, and his replacement, too. Kinda sorta like an institutional, organised thingy.

Actually I have no dog in this fight, except that these maniacs (both sides) threaten my children's future. The Israelis are the ones with my elected officials in thier back pockets, so I see them as the biggest pebble in my shoe right now.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 16:58 | 1858163 whstlblwr
whstlblwr's picture

Bullshit, this man only in power two years then shot and killed, his replacement not Jewish. Look you asshole prejudice prick, my wife great grandfather was Jew kidnaped to fight for Bolsheviks. Most his Jewish family killed in pogroms, he tried to escape Soviet Union because many Jews being killed, he was arrested and sent to Siberia.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:15 | 1858252 Clay Hill
Clay Hill's picture

My bad regarding Yezhof...

and you're still an idiot.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 18:24 | 1858525 hivekiller
hivekiller's picture

The pograms were insituted to protect Christian society from the rapiciousness of the Jews. They were finally banished to the Pale. Bolshevism was the Jewish revenge on the Russian people. They enslaved an entire country and murdered 20 to 60 million Russians - most of them Christians. Can't have a NWO with Orthodox Russia in place. Stalin was more of a nationalist communist and hence the 'cold war'. After the Jews poisoned him they lost interest in Russia and moved to Palestine. But the oligarths who took over Russia after the Soviet Union fell were - guess who - Jews.

 

The world doesn't have a Muslim problem It has a Jewish problem.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 20:45 | 1858988 whstlblwr
whstlblwr's picture

The world doesn't have Muslim or Jewish problem, it has small minded, ignorant hivekiller problem. You and people who love to hate are problem. Good thing that good people out number pigs like you who don't know history. I'm surprised you can read.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 21:31 | 1859110 hivekiller
hivekiller's picture

109 Locations whence Jews have been Expelled since AD250

YEAR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .PLACE 250 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Carthage 415 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Alexandria 554 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Diocèse of Clermont (France) 561 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Diocèse of Uzès (France) 612 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Visigoth Spain 642 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Visigoth Empire 855 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Italy 876 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Sens 1012 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mainz 1182 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - France 1182 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Germany 1276 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Upper Bavaria 1290 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - England 1306 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - France 1322 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - France (again) 1348 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Switzerland 1349 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hielbronn (Germany) 1349 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Saxony 1349 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hungary 1360 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hungary 1370 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Belgium 1380 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Slovakia 1388 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Strasbourg 1394 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Germany 1394 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - France 1420 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lyons 1421 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Austria 1424 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Fribourg 1424 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Zurich 1424 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Cologne 1432 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Savoy 1438 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mainz 1439 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Augsburg 1442 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Netherlands 1444 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Netherlands 1446 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bavaria 1453 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - France 1453 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Breslau 1454 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Wurzburg 1462 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mainz 1483 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mainz 1484 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Warsaw 1485 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Vincenza (Italy) 1492 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Spain 1492 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Italy 1495 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lithuania 1496 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Naples 1496 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Portugal 1498 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Nuremberg 1498 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Navarre 1510 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Brandenberg 1510 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prussia 1514 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Strasbourg 1515 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Genoa 1519 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Regensburg 1533 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Naples 1541 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Naples 1542 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prague & Bohemia 1550 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Genoa 1551 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bavaria 1555 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pesaro 1557 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prague 1559 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Austria 1561 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prague 1567 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Wurzburg 1569 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Papal States 1571 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Brandenburg 1582 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Netherlands 1582 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hungary 1593 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Brandenburg, Austria 1597 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Cremona, Pavia & Lodi 1614 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Frankfort 1615 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Worms 1619 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Kiev 1648 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ukraine 1648 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Poland 1649 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hamburg 1654 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Little Russia (Beylorus) 1656 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lithuania 1669 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Oran (North Africa) 1669 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Vienna 1670 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Vienna 1712 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Sandomir 1727 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Russia 1738 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Wurtemburg 1740 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Little Russia (Beylorus) 1744 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Prague, Bohemia 1744 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Slovakia 1744 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Livonia 1745 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Moravia 1753 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Kovad (Lithuania) 1761 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bordeaux 1772 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Deported to the Pale of Settlement (Poland/Russia) 1775 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Warsaw 1789 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Alsace 1804 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Villages in Russia 1808 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Villages & Countrysides (Russia) 1815 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Lbeck & Bremen 1815 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Franconia, Swabia & Bavaria 1820 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bremen 1843 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Russian Border Austria & Prussia 1862 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Areas in the U.S. under General Grant's Jurisdiction[1] 1866 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Galatz, Romania 1880s - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Russia 1891 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Moscow 1919 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Bavaria (foreign born Jews) 1938-45 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Nazi Controlled Areas 1948 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Arab Countries

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 22:05 | 1859231 nmewn
nmewn's picture

So...you're sayin...these governments expelled "them" and yet these places that expelled "them" are still basket cases or no longer exist?

Sounds like wrath of God type stuff ;-)

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 22:55 | 1859409 hivekiller
hivekiller's picture

Idiot. Are France, Germany, Switzerland not around or are they basketcases? Can't you read moron?

If a tribe of hateful people are expelled from just about every country they inhabit, it's not the country that's at fault - it's the tribe.

Wed, 11/09/2011 - 02:42 | 1859776 yipcarl
yipcarl's picture

wow amazing, I knew but that! You should have 1000 likes. 

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 16:20 | 1857980 tmosley
tmosley's picture

No, how about we stop characterizing the actions of individuals in power as the actions of entire groups of people?

INDIVIDUALS in positions of power did those things, and continue to do them.  BLAME THEM.  And blame the orgnizational structures that allow these people to gain these inordinate powers and use them to their own ends.  

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 18:05 | 1858459 DaveyJones
DaveyJones's picture

that's dangerous talk, have you been reading Orwell again?

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 20:20 | 1858912 redcorona
redcorona's picture

That wont work because those in power play chess.  And they have lots of pawns.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 15:30 | 1857690 love
love's picture

hoover dam $50 dollar bill?

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 15:45 | 1857804 Cthonic
Cthonic's picture

Iconic American structure. Bridge near it completed. Lake behind it dwindling.  Barry doesn't like Vegas.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:13 | 1858234 HungrySeagull
HungrySeagull's picture

The reason they did the bridge was strategic. Lose the dam but still have access through there.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 15:51 | 1857830 aerojet
aerojet's picture

Why is this receiving downvotes?  After the NYC and London "attacks," both of which took place during training exercises to confuse and slow the response, how can anyone discount the possibility that if the power elite get backed into a corner financially they won't resort to ANOTHER false flag operation?  You dont' have to be a brain surgeon to see exactly who benefits and who pays for acts of terror.  Hint:  The government and its suppliers are the beneficiaries as well as the banks who need clever excuses to explain gigantic losses whilst saving face.  Wars do all that and they exterminate excess populations of people, and in a world of 7 billion humans and rising, ditching a few measly million proles here and there is also a win for the elite.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 16:01 | 1857886 eurogold
eurogold's picture

I find it interesting that no one in Isreal mentions the fact that Pakistan has nuclear weapons, nor that Isreal stole the technology (through spying on the U.S.A. and France) to build its own (200 atomic warheads).

No, thats O.K.......Its Israel, they can do anything they want.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 16:54 | 1858147 azzhatter
azzhatter's picture

while also surrendering the few remaining rights they have left

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:10 | 1857172 redpill
redpill's picture

The entire notion of attacking Iran is complete insanity, and reeks of desperation.

The warmongers have had their time.  Now clear-eyed people of the world must stand up and against their aggression.  We are not their lambs to slaughter.  Our children are not their expendable pawns.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:27 | 1857312 Desert Irish
Desert Irish's picture

70 years old but the warmongers never learn. It could have been written today.....Charlie Chaplin "The Great Dictator"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WibmcsEGLKo&feature=related

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:33 | 1857352 Carlyle Groupie
Carlyle Groupie's picture

Irish Gaza ship prisoners claim they were abused by Israeli commandos

http://www.irishcentral.com/news/Irish-Gaza-ship-prisoners-claim-they-we...

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:35 | 1857367 Deadpool
Deadpool's picture

"there's no fighting in the War Room!" Dr. Strangelove

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 15:53 | 1857837 BoNeSxxx
BoNeSxxx's picture

Everything is going according to plan (see Project for the New American Century)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_American_Century

 

Brought to you by Wolfowitz, Cheney, Rumsfeld and the usual cast of MIC douche bags.

 

Syria is next.  Mark my words.  This was decided long ago and only a Black Swan event or a quickly enlightened world citizenry can stop it.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 15:57 | 1857865 BoNeSxxx
BoNeSxxx's picture

Edit: It just struck me.  A quckly enlightened citizenry would qualify as a de facto black swan event.  Apologies for the redundancy.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:27 | 1857316 LFMayor
LFMayor's picture

LOL.  Well, if you stand up, you best have a rifle in your hand.  YMMV

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 16:36 | 1858048 buckethead
buckethead's picture

Had to brave the smartphone login to give the thumbs up to Red Pill, but it was a must.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:14 | 1857200 Long-John-Silver
Long-John-Silver's picture

Stuxnet destroyed centrifuges they can never repair or replace. It also reported the exact coordinates of everything it invaded in Iran, which was everything even remotely connected to it's nuclear program.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:26 | 1857302 LFMayor
LFMayor's picture

exactly!  These people have to import it if it has more than 4 moving parts, and they could tear up a ball bearing with a flyswatter.  They have no manufacturing capability if the equipment is not shipped in.  The don't build shit like generators, transformers, circuit boards, mills, lathes. They don't have smelters, foundries, assembly lines that are indiginous. I honestly doubt that they're capable of casting, machining and assembling even small internal combustion engines.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 23:44 | 1859506 MayIMommaDogFac...
MayIMommaDogFace2theBananaPatch's picture

Did you forget the <sarc>?

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:52 | 1857482 delacroix
delacroix's picture

bullshit     the centrifuges, are reset, and the data systems were closed. they already have a nuke, they just need fuel, for the copies

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 15:54 | 1857845 aerojet
aerojet's picture

How does a computer virus know its geographic location?  Most computers do not have any sort of gps chip in them and if they're inside of a building, it is a moot point, anyhow.  The best you could do with virus is get back a network address, and if the machine is not on a network, or is on a completely separate network, what would you have?

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:15 | 1858251 HungrySeagull
HungrySeagull's picture

They just build more.

 

It takes thousands and thousands spinning just so.

 

Hell Oak Ridge used to have competitions as to which person was able to move the power controls the least amount all day.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:15 | 1857213 LFMayor
LFMayor's picture

According to Curtis LeMay the major cities are a good place to begin.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 15:22 | 1857657 optimator
optimator's picture

Before they hit the cities they hit the retaliatory sites, and use SEAD (supression of enemy air defense) assets.  I wouldn't be surprised if Russia and Red China helped Iran with "Volunteer" air defense units.  The Red China of today is a little different from the Red China of 1950 Korean war era.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:17 | 1858260 HungrySeagull
HungrySeagull's picture

Those Tors and S300C's or later models are going to be a royal bitch.

 

They might require pin point targeting and conventional ICBM Sub launches to take them out And when they do go, the strike might have a chance. Just might.

 

To be honest it would be folly to use anything other than a B2 or a ICBM armed with kinetic or Conventional (Or some other wild payload such as that which shorted out entire grids a few years ago.)

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:17 | 1857231 Deadpool
Deadpool's picture

I think we could find more than 80 bombs sitting idle. Take out the power grids and fuel supples and they won't work anyway.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:18 | 1857244 Jean
Jean's picture

Them all, Israel can build Jericho 3, whatever that strike UAV is called, and Turbo Popeyes faster then iran can build factories or develop a credible missile defense system.

Didn't down ding you, but this wont be Osairak II, see:

  csis.org/files/media/csis/pubs/090316_israelistrikeiran.pdf

Not even going to consider Israel going nuclear first.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:57 | 1857524 farmerjohn2112
farmerjohn2112's picture

Horrifying...

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:22 | 1857268 Zymurguy
Zymurguy's picture

glass over the entire fooking country

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:39 | 1857384 Instant Wealth
Instant Wealth's picture

Which one ... Iran or Israel ?

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:50 | 1857461 Tramp Stamper
Tramp Stamper's picture

The one that, if glassed over, would help bring stability to the ME

Wed, 11/09/2011 - 11:47 | 1860919 DaveyJones
DaveyJones's picture

us?

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:44 | 1857413 Ima anal sphincter
Ima anal sphincter's picture

I wonder how you would feel if YOUR parents, kids, sisters and brothers were wiped out. Americans sit and watch that fricking boob-tube full of Zionist lies while people are MURDERED overseas. Why don't we put O's daughters up front when the fighting starts. How about all the traitors in CONgress put their family members up there with them.

How ignorant and brainwashed are you? Or...that statement sounds like it comes from "the tribe" mentality. Shut TFU.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:59 | 1857539 Great Dane
Great Dane's picture

I don't understand youpeople, I mean the Skank-ardashian 'Kim' just made 17 million for 72 days of marriage and your worreid about Iran?  All of you are soooooo deranged.   LOHAN... on 4 hours in jail!  Com'on get with the program fellas!

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 16:10 | 1857901 BoNeSxxx
BoNeSxxx's picture

If I could, I would up arrow you 1,000,000 times.

Mandatory conscription is the best way to end the bullshit.  Everyone goes... or nobody goes.  No more exceptions/exemptions for the sons and daughters of the 1% and ESPECIALLY those of the politicians.

BRAVO

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:23 | 1858294 Dr. Acula
Dr. Acula's picture

>I wonder how you would feel if YOUR parents, kids, sisters and brothers were wiped out.

Sociopaths don't care about such things.

"He considered the monopoly force of government the greatest danger to liberty and the long-term well-being of the populace, labeling the State as nothing but a "gang of thieves writ large"—the locus of the most immoral, grasping and unscrupulous individuals in any society... He viewed many regulations and laws ostensibly promulgated for the "public interest" as self-interested power grabs by scheming government bureaucrats engaging in dangerously unfettered self-aggrandizement, as they were not subject to market disciplines" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothbard

 

 

 

 

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 17:18 | 1858269 HungrySeagull
HungrySeagull's picture

Might have to do that... if the Iranians are dumb enough to lob the big one.

 

Israelis face being turned to glass each day this goes on.

 

I don't have any faith in our Government to have the Balls big enough to return the favor in Megatonnage, delivered quickly within 30 minutes peace gauranteed through firepower.

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:27 | 1857319 PivotalTrades
PivotalTrades's picture

you just said there were 80 sites..

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 14:45 | 1857421 Smiddywesson
Smiddywesson's picture

Where?  With over 80 possible nuclear sites all over Iran, where do they bomb? 

One well placed EMP over the center of the country would do the job nicely.

Why bomb when you can just turn off the lights?

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 15:57 | 1857863 gaoptimize
gaoptimize's picture

For a country on the edge of economic stability, such an attack might be a civilization disrupter that it might never recover from.  The economic, humanitarian, and longer term military and geo-political consequences would have to be very carefully considered.  We also might not want that precedent out there.

http://www.empcommission.org/docs/A2473-EMP_Commission-7MB.pdf

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 18:18 | 1858505 krispkritter
krispkritter's picture

Yeah, an EMP in the US and people will lose their fucking minds without DWTS and HBO, cell service, not to mention electricity. Dangerous precedent indeed...

Tue, 11/08/2011 - 15:12 | 1857623 DarthVaderMentor
DarthVaderMentor's picture

Those who think 80 different targets make it impossible for Israel to accurately hit vital facilities disregard historical facts.

In the 1967 war, Egypt had over 540 aircraft in 43 airbases. Of the 540+ aircraft, 160+ were dummies, undistinguishable from the real thing from the air. Yet the Israeli Air Force only hit 11 dummy aircraft and destroyed 97.6% of the real aircraft. They had intelligence sources that told them which aircraft were dummies and actually induced the Arabs to park all their real aircraft on the tarmac.

Military experts would suggest hitting all 80 targets with bombs that would intentionally spread debris. The resultant radioactive contamination spread in the explosions would make the real sites uninhabitable for years.

My only question would be if the Saudis help the Iraelis or not by giving them through access to hit Iranian targets. My bet is that they'd secretly support the Israelis.  

 

 

 

 

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!