Iran Update: Six (Or Eight) UK Embassy Staff Taken Hostage: Iran Contra Redux?

Tyler Durden's picture

Even more mysterious update #2:


Mysterious update confirming that something very fishy is going on here:


Today's developments are rapidly turning into a repeat of Iran-Contra:


Expect a very formal, and very forceful UK response imminently.

Once again - got Brent?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
TruthInSunshine's picture

The British are going to send in Jeremy Clarkston, Benny Hill and Mr. Bean to try and mount a rescue attempt.

achmachat's picture

I've seen that movie... I think it was called Johnny English.

redcorona's picture

Someone tell the Tram lady.  THAT is how you deal with unwanted immigrants.

Pladizow's picture

CIA Assets at work?

America needs an excuse to spread freedom, democracy and liberate the Iranian people (AKA: Oil)!

CPL's picture

Not CIA. Blackwater/XE.  CIA/FBI/NSA/DHS was crushed by the private contractors, thought everyone got the memo six years ago.  Hell even the US Military has less to do with US military actions.


There a reason nobody is paying much attention to bouncing pension checks from the retired spooks, they have zero leverage geopolitically and the teeth were yanked out of all their heads and their lobby groups are ignored.  I personally thought that the King makers had some minerals at one point in time, but the cold war is over so now the four agencies are fighting for the scraps at the table and hoping to keep the lights on.


Things are not as they traditionally would be seen.  Think price by project.  Not departments enforcing US influence.  Ever wonder why Mexico is a mess and south America couldn't give a shit about northern gringos?  No teeth.  And TPTB knows it.



hedgeless_horseman's picture




Cardigans, solar panels,
and peace in the Middle East, bitchezzz!!!

nonclaim's picture

In the campaign we were promised the black Kennedy. And we got the Carter?

GeneMarchbanks's picture

Carter as in the character played by Chris Tucker in the Rush Hour movie trilogy. Classic Hollywood. Yep, that Carter.

TruthInSunshine's picture


You need to put a headshot of John Corzine hiding out begind the bookcase (rumor has it he's on the lam, sleeping in the Lincoln Bedroom at night).

GeneMarchbanks's picture

The moonbats fell for it. Enjoy, 'Merikans, at least for another 11 months or so.

goldfish1's picture

pop on to ZH, get jerked back to the real world.

thanks for the post.

g speed's picture

You may have a point as far as offshore corp. ops. goes, however the gang of four is doing well here at home (in the USA). Drug price support effort doing nicely (war on drugs) --lots of new SS teams springing up (FED private police). Plenty of kickback and payoff in FEMA construction projects, and the privatization of the prison system is going well.  And don't forget the threats, intimidation, propaganda and lies departments of these well established groups----  

CPL's picture

They created the framework to do what the US needed to get onto the stage and become a power.  But like so many other historical references regarding secret service agencies they are typically the first to be culled in a soft coup.


I know it's not discussed, but the CIA and FBI are in bad shape financially, DHS hasn't been funded properly ever, NSA, well, they are a weirdness all to themselves.  but all three share the same issues all govie agencies suffer from 80% of the people in the agencies are useless as admin, support or ops staff, yet the 20% that actually do the work are carrying the incompetent staff.


We'll see the mass layoffs coming and that 20% of useful and effective civil service vaporised. Mainly if you are doing your job in the government, it means you aren't covering your back.  If you do not internally subscribe to the Silos and Taskforce crap and you are NOT deployed, might as well quit.  But in this case, they'll be shit canned.


I would be very worried if I were working in the four departments over 22 years.  Means super annuation hasn't happened on the pension and it's easier for a department to turf the employee than keep them for the full 35 year tenure.  Saves billions if not trillions over the long term.


April 1st in both DC and Ottawa will be very interesting.  I understand a 30% employee reduction is being suggested for all departments in both the US and Canada.

RoadKill's picture

Good - they are over funded anyway. FBI should do domestic investigations. CIA should do international operations. NSA and DHS can be scrapped. We don't need to pay 100,000 overweight union retards to pat us down at airports.

And let's HOPE we get a 30% cut in military head count too. Close out the wars. Consolidate all foreign bases into 5 regional HQs and bring all the coldest troops home from Germany, Japan and Korea. We don't need to pay for this shit. Take military spending per GDP to Euro levels and let them pay for their own protection.

And if you want to give me an orgasim, let's extend the 30% headcount cut to ALL federal employees. Cut pay 10% and benefits 50%. Decertify the unions. Anyone that doesn't like it can walk. That'll fix our deficit pretty quick if we privatize and seclude SS, Medicare/Medicaid, Highway Trust Fund, Amtrak, Post Office and everything else that SHOULD be handled by private companies.

unnamed enemy's picture

i don't see how the owners will benefit from any of this.


sullymandias's picture

Not CIA. Blackwater/XE.

Really? It feels like IRAN to me. A counterstrike to us sabotaging their missile base.

Tompooz's picture

..and on the same day Israeli security company Magal Security Systems pops by 67%..

dwdollar's picture

There are MANY institutions, industries, and people which benefit from perpetual war.

Momauguin Joe's picture

The ultimate question one must ask: Who stands to benefit?

Carlyle Groupie's picture

Avid response comrade. Once all the Muzzies are dead the US will be safe, right Alice?

Good luck with that. Next up; TSA check-points at every cross street.

Abitdodgie's picture

If they put check-points on the streets then it is time to practice long distance groupings on them .

JoBob's picture

Maybe it was Iranian protesters without CIA help! SOmetimes things are just what they appear to be.

achmachat's picture

and she's already a meme? hehe

a growing concern's picture

They should send in Richard Hammond in the Marauder.  Here's a testosterone fix to get everyone's Tuesday going right:

slaughterer's picture

Brent is flat on this news.  

CPL's picture

Brent is other people's oil with a 10% fee.  WTI is where you get the number from.

rbg81's picture

These folks will be held hostage until the first Iranian nuke (and delivery system) is ready to go.  Its all about making sure no more sabotague occurs till then.

And no relation to "Iran Contra".  Geeze.....

aleph0's picture

Could we send Tony Blair as well please ?


Carlyle Groupie's picture

Quick, someone at the PentiCON lose $4.8 Trillion US fiatcons.

CORNGUY's picture

Fuck that.     Nuke 'em

CORNGUY's picture

Maybe we will get lucky and they will retaliate by Nukin DC

unky's picture

Is this the tipping point to start a war?

Libertarian777's picture

It's the same old same old. Exactly what Ron Paul's been saying. Economic sanctions don't hurt the regime, it hurts the little guy in the street. All the ruling elites in Iran need to do is then demonise the west and let their sheeple do their dirty work. With all the war mongering the west has been doing the average Iranian probably supports the bomb and this embassy action. Blowback bitchezzz.


Note, its the sheeple on BOTH sides that does the dirty work. Iranian sheeple protest and take over an embassy, US and UK sheeple sign up for the 'serving your country' BS and invade Iran. Who dies? SHEEPLE.

CPL's picture

It's been planned for two years.  Nice big nuke fight.  Don't need spooks for a nuke fight.

lizzy36's picture


Obama's presidency really is a redux of Jimmy Carters. 

fasTTcar's picture

Damn lizzy, you beat me too it.

Carlyle Groupie's picture

You didn't see the marriage of the jewess to the prince?

A Jewish King And Queen Of England?

john39's picture

dig a little deeper into windsor family history, the prince married one of his own.

hedgeless_horseman's picture



Except I believe Israel's real GDP growth is still positive.

The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) predicts gross domestic product (GDP) growth for the UK will be 0.9% in 2011 and 0.7% in 2012.

Pick any number for inflation, and this spells more recession/depression/stagflation.

SheepDog-One's picture

The Pope owns 65% of Israel property.

GeneMarchbanks's picture

Are you insinuating an Israeli property bubble?

Cause I'm ready to short.

nonclaim's picture

The Queen of England owns a good size of the country and she's also head of the Anglicans. What's your point?

Hmm... on the other hand the royal family is no longer prohibited from marrying Catholics... I think we can brew a good conspiracy here :)