This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Jefferies Said To Demand Bonus Clawbacks From Terminated Bankers

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Earlier today, Fox Business' Charlie Gasparino broke the news (which was really surprising only for anyone who had not seen the JEF stock slide in the past several months) that the firm has fired a substantial number of people just after the bank's fiscal year end: "People inside the firm say the cuts are occurring most heavily in Jefferies' equities division, and according to traders inside the firm, they could total as much as 11% of the entire firm when the job cutting is complete". We now have some additional, and more disturbing information: the actual number of people is roughly 65 or so, but the worst news is that Rich Handler will demand a 1 year clawback from the departees, in the form of bonus refunds for both cash and stuck. While this has been isolated to Jefferies for the time being (which has other liquidity concerns of its own, most of which are quite well known), we are certain that now that this practice has a "case study" other banks, especially of the B-grade variety, will implement comparable clawback strategies. This approach, once adopted broadly, will likely cause a substantial dent in banker spending patterns, as rarely if ever before have termination without cause been accompanied by demand for money back. In effect, this activity will force even greater spending retrenchment, and could cause a flight of the ultra high net worth retail customer who will suddenly be forced to think twice about spending not the upcoming bonus, but even the previous one, heretofore considered safe and sound, in some Cayman bank account.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Mon, 12/12/2011 - 14:58 | 1971043 slaughterer
slaughterer's picture

Time to short BID.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:03 | 1971065 TheFourthStooge-ing
TheFourthStooge-ing's picture

Baaaaaaaawwwwww! The poor butthurt parasites! How will they survive? They can't clawback their bonus money from the hookers or their coke dealers. Baaaawwww!!!

 

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:15 | 1971119 Manthong
Manthong's picture

So is this where thieves part company?

Is this where the boardroom and the real equity starts to pin the blame on the executives who thought they were in the club?

 

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:25 | 1971166 Dr. Richard Head
Dr. Richard Head's picture

One could only hope.  It is bound to happen of course. 

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:38 | 1971226 12ToothAssassin
12ToothAssassin's picture

Cant they merely 'ask' for it back? There is no actual recourse to make them give it back, is there?

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 16:35 | 1971360 sqz
sqz's picture

I do not see how this is remotely legal at individual level. There may be clawback opportunities with just stock, stock rights and possibly even pensions. But for cash, how?

The UK tried similar things since 2008 with its banking executives and the farce of their failed banks (notably RBS). The law was so watertight that the only reason they got even a fraction of funds from an executive was because he volunteered it, basically he made a nominal donation via his pension!

Those "departees" at Jeffries should have great legal recourse now and in future. The savy ones (good institutional traders tend to be) would make it clear they will gladly use the legal opportunity to management, thus likely causing management to back down.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 17:15 | 1971620 Sofa King
Sofa King's picture

I guess they can have their money back when they give the employees' their time and effort back.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 18:25 | 1971821 tooktheredpill
tooktheredpill's picture

yeah right - like they really want to fuck themselves

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 16:22 | 1971414 Darth..Putter
Darth..Putter's picture

The all mighty and high will also be stripped of wealth for the sake of the mysterious controllers of the Earth.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:28 | 1971170 DoChenRollingBearing
DoChenRollingBearing's picture

dupe post, sorry

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:27 | 1971174 DoChenRollingBearing
DoChenRollingBearing's picture

Bank accounts in the Caymans are no longer safe, from the IRS anyway.

But, the banksters probably already have quiet little deals worked out with .gov so that THEIR ACCOUNTS are safe.  But, budding tax evaders ought not even CONSIDER doing stuff like that: stashing money overseas illegally.  And even that is getting harder as many foreign banks ´over there´ do not want Americans´money anyway.

Buy gold instead.  And if you can get gold to a trusted place overseas, look into that!

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:38 | 1971224 Gubbmint Cheese
Gubbmint Cheese's picture

Freudian slip there Tyler, "Cash and Stuck"..

 

love it.

 

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 16:25 | 1971421 Darth..Putter
Darth..Putter's picture

Congress just made Panama the New-Safe-Haven.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 22:28 | 1972492 sun tzu
sun tzu's picture

It's not illegal to keep money overseas as long as you report it and pay the interest. Gold is safer though

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 22:42 | 1972533 MacGruber
MacGruber's picture

Best fucking news I've heard all day. I want those fucking weasels to suffer.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:25 | 1971163 Jadr
Jadr's picture

I'm pretty close to pulling the trigger on it.  The stock has gone to under $10 every major slowdown since the 90s, I don't see how it has much upside potential given the stuff happening around the world besides getting raised on some massive new QE program or something.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:25 | 1971165 HedgeAccordingly
HedgeAccordingly's picture

Euro 6E... not looking so hot today - http://hedge.ly/uQPyKP 

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 18:44 | 1971857 Silver Bug
Silver Bug's picture

They shouldn't of gotten a cent to begin with!

 

http://silverliberationarmy.blogspot.com/

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:01 | 1971047 hedgeless_horseman
hedgeless_horseman's picture

 

 

While this has been isolated to Jefferies for the time being (which has other liquidity concerns of its own, most of which are quite well known), we are certain that now that this practice has a "case study" other banks,

Dear Lord Blankfein:

How will you justify record bonuses when GS stock is down more than 40 % on the year?

Regards,

F.B.O. Non-employee shareholders

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:01 | 1971055 Deadpool
Deadpool's picture

Dear HH:

Tradition.

Regards

LB

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:28 | 1971177 Debt-Is-Not-Money
Debt-Is-Not-Money's picture

Dear HH,

We're doing God's work here!

Regards,

LB

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:01 | 1971050 Deadpool
Deadpool's picture

let the lawsuits commence. Maybe go long law degrees?

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:08 | 1971089 john39
john39's picture

don't bother.  tuition inflated, return on dollar sucks.  besides, there is already a flood of young law school grads who either cant find jobs or end up in shitty underpaid work.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:29 | 1971185 Vergeltung
Vergeltung's picture

this is 100% true.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:33 | 1971207 DoChenRollingBearing
DoChenRollingBearing's picture

Unless you are an extremely bright young lawyer-to-be, just save the expense and time of law school and just go be a paralegal.  Since they are paid less, they don´t have any problem getting a job.

Most lawyers I know have pretty boring jobs, so being a paralegal does not cut into (much) a more interesting job.

The only exception I would understand right off is being a lawyer-lobbyist in DC. At least until #guillotinethelawyers comes by...

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 16:15 | 1971391 Deadpool
Deadpool's picture

there is always room in the legislature. sweet pensions and opportunities for graft.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:49 | 1971287 willien1derland
willien1derland's picture

Well John there may be hope yet...if the Euro Zone does part ways it will be a legal bonanza!

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:13 | 1971104 oddjob
oddjob's picture

Just what the world needs...more lawyers. I hear their car on the red-line will have green lamps.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:13 | 1971112 MachoMan
MachoMan's picture

Not really...  pretty specialized and will fall to a short list of well-established firms...  new entrants into the market will be scrounging around the uncontested docket (divorces) and the bankruptcy courts like they have for a few years...  it's a race to see who can place the cheapest add in the local paper and make the most obnoxious billboard...  all at the expense of any viable, top-shelf future.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:05 | 1971059 GeneMarchbanks
GeneMarchbanks's picture

Dick Handler... you have some 'splaining to do...

Damn! JEF is cash strapped...

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 18:29 | 1971826 Cathartes Aura
Cathartes Aura's picture

Dick Handler will always have a job. . .

(does he work with Dirk Diggler by any chance?)

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 20:00 | 1972088 11b40
11b40's picture

No, he works with Dick Trickle.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:02 | 1971060 Ahmeexnal
Ahmeexnal's picture

Eat your peas!

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:03 | 1971063 ZeroPower
ZeroPower's picture

will demand a 1 year clawback from the departees, in the form of bonus refunds

My response would be a big fuck you to someone if they asked for my bonus back. Im also not sure as to what (if any?) legal issues are at stake here. That thief Cassano didnt give a cent of his subprime bonus back, and here JEF in an (arguably slightly better) similar situation, I dont believe any of the fired or still employed have any obligations to submit to the request..

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:05 | 1971073 Deadpool
Deadpool's picture

read your contract. I'm sure it says they can kill you if they want; or something to that effect.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:07 | 1971085 JLee2027
JLee2027's picture

Contracts can "say" anything, whether they stand up in a court of law is another story.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:11 | 1971102 Deadpool
Deadpool's picture

no doubt, but who'd want to spend their entire bonus (and them some) on legal fees fighting the man? good luck.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 16:21 | 1971408 gmrpeabody
gmrpeabody's picture

"whether they stand up in a court of law is another story."

In case you haven't been paying attention.., the courts are about as fair and equitable as the TBTFs themselves. The justice system has suffered a breakdown. Just ask Eric...

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 22:31 | 1972501 sun tzu
sun tzu's picture

There's nobody more corrupt than the judges. Every single one of them used to be a lawyer.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:11 | 1971106 Falcon15
Falcon15's picture

Most times, the law says if you signed on the dotted line, you're screwed. What, you did not read it before you signed it? Is that your signature right there? Tough cookies. NEXT!

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:25 | 1971159 oddjob
oddjob's picture

always try to slip in a per: before your strawman signs for you.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:32 | 1971199 Vergeltung
Vergeltung's picture

total lol

 

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:06 | 1971080 JLee2027
JLee2027's picture

Clawback can't be legal.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:16 | 1971127 MachoMan
MachoMan's picture

It can certainly be equitable, which is good enough in most circumstances (and certainly can give the court jurisdiction).  It may be legal depending on what contracts any of these folks signed or agreements they entered regarding following corporate policy (and then corporate policy had to allow it).

Regardless, even if only prospectively applied, it would be the death bell of the industry...  not much point in eating your cake if you can't have it too...  for people who love just having things.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:27 | 1971173 Uber Vandal
Uber Vandal's picture

That did not stop MF'n Global from reversing a bank wire transfer.

 

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 16:05 | 1971353 ghengis86
ghengis86's picture

Yep. Direct deposit works both ways, just like the bankers and their hookers; digits in, digits out. Be sure to wash your hands!

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:51 | 1971297 Whoa Dammit
Whoa Dammit's picture

Nothing a Wall Street Bank does is illegal. Haven't you learned that yet?    ;-).

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 16:36 | 1971473 NotApplicable
NotApplicable's picture

Legal? Depends on which gun is used.

In other news: Dick Handler has a clawback function. Who knew?

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:07 | 1971084 TheFourthStooge-ing
TheFourthStooge-ing's picture

While I think you're probably correct, I'd love to see Cassano, Chuck Prince, Angelo Mozillo, et al., get clawed back.

 

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:26 | 1971169 Ancona
Ancona's picture

Well..........clawed anyway, and prefferably in the eyes.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:13 | 1971088 GeneMarchbanks
GeneMarchbanks's picture

All that is static, this is one last attempt before they go the way of the Global motherfuckers... Or they'll start 'commingling' if they haven't already.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:52 | 1971303 willien1derland
willien1derland's picture

+1000 ZP - wish you ran the SEC with an attitude like that! Hell knows no fury like that of Canadian with integrity!

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 16:40 | 1971486 SilverRhino
SilverRhino's picture

My response would be a big fuck you to someone if they asked for my bonus back

Roger that one.  I worked, you paid, fuck you and fuck the law at this point.  (PM's pretty much "anything"-proof short of armed robbery)

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:04 | 1971068 kito
kito's picture

looks like each passing day is proving jim rogers correct when he advised young folk to forego wall street and learn farming.............

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:26 | 1971167 junkyardjack
junkyardjack's picture

The jig is up, there is no more honor amongst thieves 

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 22:33 | 1972505 sun tzu
sun tzu's picture

I wonder how many of today's yoofs could farm. 

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:04 | 1971069 junkyardjack
junkyardjack's picture

How will they fire someone and then demand that the fired employee pay them? What is the consequence if the employee can't pay?  Will the employee have to remain an employee of JEF?  I don't see how this is supposed to work.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:09 | 1971097 Falcon15
Falcon15's picture

Dependent on the compensation break down and/or severance pakages it can be taken from someone's paycheck, severance, etc. Do not pass go and pay the bank 200 bucks. Thankyabuhbye.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 17:02 | 1971591 DonnieD
DonnieD's picture

So JEF is forcing employees to fund their severance payments with their previously paid bonuses. Genius.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:15 | 1971123 Deadpool
Deadpool's picture

the bonus is paid by the bank/broker by taking out a forgivable loan. they charge the employee interest and per IRS rules deduct that pricipal from future earnings in a multi year vesting schedule. The loan can be demanded back. no such thing as free lunch.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:23 | 1971151 junkyardjack
junkyardjack's picture

I guess that makes sense if its paid that way.  It certainly wasn't set up that way a few years ago in investment banking, at least at the lower levels

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:25 | 1971160 machineh
machineh's picture

'What is the consequence if the employee can't pay?'

Look up 'kneecapping' in the urban dictionary. Capische?

You paya da moolah, or we breaka yo face.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:06 | 1971078 JW n FL
JW n FL's picture

 

 

Hedgeweek Special Report: The Evolution of the Prime Brokerage Model: December 2011

With leverage dropping to modest levels following the halcyon pre-2008 era, prime brokers are finding new ways to service their hedge fund clients, focusing on areas such as securities lending in the Asian markets and broadening their range of synthetic solutions. This Hedgeweek Special Report outlines the latest developments in Prime Brokerage, based on interviews with:

- Jefferies
- FRM Global Advisors
- UBS Hong Kong
- Deutsche Bank
- Bank of America Merrill Lynch
- Skyline Capital Management
- Citigroup
- JP Morgan
- Dechert LLP

The report features expert contributions from:

- Chris Barrow, HSBC Prime Services
- Mike Rosen, Concept Capital Markets.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:15 | 1971120 JW n FL
JW n FL's picture

 

 

http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2011/12/more_on_those_s.html

But Professor Wray goes on to speak admirably about an analysis by his student James Felkerson that does exactly that, and concludes that the Fed lent not $7.77 trillion but instead $29 trillion.

A separate issue concerns whether it is appropriate to add together outstanding loan balances as of different points in time in order to generate a total, for example, adding MBS to items 1-5. Here Professor Wray reasons by analogy:

Think about it this way. A half dozen drunken sailors are at the bar, and the bartender refills their shot glasses with whiskey each time a drink is taken. At any instant, the bar-keep has committed only six ounces of booze. That is a useful measure of whiskey outstanding. But it is not useful for telling us how much the drunks drank. Bernanke would like us to believe that if the Fed newly lent a trillion bucks every day for 3 years to all our drunken bankers that we should total that as only a trillion greenbacks committed.

Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:18 | 1971132 JW n FL
JW n FL's picture

 

 

ALL! Credit for such a GREAT / Fantastic Find.. Goes to Calculated Risk! http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/

MF Global and Rehypothecation

  • European Bond Yields rising
  • Sunday Night Futures
  • Wolfgang Münchau: "The crisis goes on"
  • Hamilton: "More on those secret Federal Reserve loans to banks" <---------------- there she blows!
  • So many Thanks to Calculated Risk! if you do NOT follow or subscribe I would recomend you do both. With the Caveat that Ignorance is Bliss and Stupidity is Heaven!

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:22 | 1971145 topcallingtroll
    topcallingtroll's picture

    I am glad to see you are out of your depressed phase.

    You are a lot more fun manic.

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:28 | 1971183 JW n FL
    JW n FL's picture

     

     

    I am to Please!!

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:28 | 1971179 JW n FL
    JW n FL's picture

     

     

    UBS says Kyle Bass / ZeroHedge is RIGHT!! Guns, Gold and Canned Goods BITCHEZ!!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSHD8GAx68Q&feature=g-u

    Uploaded by on Dec 12, 2011

    Watch the full Keiser Report E222 on Tuesday. This week Max Keiser and co-host, Stacy Herbert, discuss virtual dollars and American plots and tinned goods and small calibre weapons. In the second half of the show, Max talks to Detlev Schlichter about elastic money and financial crises.

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:06 | 1971079 pods
    pods's picture

    This just keeps getting better and better.

    YOUR FIRED!

    Oh, and pay me back last year's bonus too!

    Didn't know all these were conditional?

    You know the world is fucked when they won't merely fire you, but try and steal money back.

    What next, bullets to the head and a bill for the bullet and cleanup?

    pods

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:07 | 1971081 LeBalance
    LeBalance's picture

    "Clawback For My Buds": Dick Handler.

    (that's just not right.)

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:15 | 1971124 topcallingtroll
    topcallingtroll's picture

    It's completely stolpered man. Totally stolpered.

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:16 | 1971126 MsCreant
    MsCreant's picture

    Dick Handler has claws. Hmm...or is that clause...

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 19:02 | 1971905 TheFourthStooge-ing
    TheFourthStooge-ing's picture

    His mother's maiden name was Vagina Dentata.

     

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:07 | 1971083 Seasmoke
    Seasmoke's picture

    what they need to do is fly to vegas bet it all on a football game, have a friend take the other side, get a receipt when you lose and tell Jefferies they gambled it all away

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:58 | 1971325 willien1derland
    willien1derland's picture

    +1000 Seasmoke - First file an injunction against JEF for the Clawback  then the EX JEF Bankers can start a Hedge Fund - Short the SH*T out of JEF and buy CDS - then when JEF collapses get paid again! Quid Pro Quo Handler!

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:08 | 1971086 a growing concern
    a growing concern's picture

    Couldn't have happened to a nicer crew.

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:08 | 1971090 Josh Randall
    Josh Randall's picture

    C'mon guys give the bonus money back, please ?

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:43 | 1971251 willien1derland
    willien1derland's picture

    +1,000 Josh - I wonder if any of the Ex-JEF bankers will be afforded the luxury of a 'Corzine' - When asked to return their bonus they can simply reply, "Sorry Mr. Handler, I simply have no idea where the money went.' OR (my personal favorite) "Visa, Mastercard, My Drug Dealer, invoked SUPER PRIORITY on those funds'

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:08 | 1971091 Heyoka Bianco
    Heyoka Bianco's picture

    My sarcasm sequencer is shorted out: is this a serious expression of concern about "clawing back" blood from turnipheads, or is Tyler just getting a foot in on these sorrybastards?

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:08 | 1971092 PaperBear
    PaperBear's picture

    A bank telling former employees to pay their bonus back to the bank - huh ?

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:46 | 1971270 willien1derland
    willien1derland's picture

    +1,000 - Paperbear It is the ULTIMATE BANK BAILOUT! Displaced Bankers bailout their former Boss Bankers...Socializing the Losses (My condolences to any Ex-JEF banker as this is absolutely a all time NEW Thug low!)-

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:10 | 1971094 Seasmoke
    Seasmoke's picture

    Jefferies employees have just been dick handled

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:28 | 1971182 machineh
    machineh's picture

    'Manually induced Peyronies disease,' according to the medical report.

    That must have hurt ...

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:09 | 1971096 ziggy59
    ziggy59's picture

    Pretty ballsy, no? They demand money back from their ex workers? Maybe its time some if them get a new job as whistleblowers.

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:14 | 1971115 Seasmoke
    Seasmoke's picture

    that sure seems like the next domino to fall (never piss off those who know where the bodies are buried)

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 23:51 | 1972675 moonstears
    moonstears's picture

    astute observation, Seasmoke!

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:10 | 1971100 Fail2Deliver
    Fail2Deliver's picture

    Ex-bankers in the OWS crowd?? How ironic. Seriously, I think there are too many over-priced bonuses on wall street but if the banks are stupid enough to pay the huge bonuses, I don't see why the bankers should give them back. I sure wouldn't. If government decides it is okay to take your earned money, we are all in trouble. Wait a minute....

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:11 | 1971103 GoldenGal
    GoldenGal's picture

    pms?

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:22 | 1971108 AldoHux_IV
    AldoHux_IV's picture

    CEO's of banks, central bankers, politicians, and officials need to go to jail and/or be face the same judgement that dictators do for their crimes against humanity and until this happens stories like these only poke at justice being served.

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:15 | 1971122 monopoly
    monopoly's picture

    It just is never ending, am so glad not involved in any of this crap. Anyone who trades this market is either a genius or a glutton for punishment and the holder of a warped mind to think you can beat a rigged fixed system.

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:18 | 1971134 topcallingtroll
    topcallingtroll's picture

    Yeah I tried to short last week and got stolpered.

    Not doing that again.

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:22 | 1971147 walküre
    walküre's picture

    you didn't call the TOP?

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 23:50 | 1972672 moonstears
    moonstears's picture
    • LOL, walkure, witty, me likee!
    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:18 | 1971131 ZeroPoint
    ZeroPoint's picture

    The banking class is eating its own? You know things are SERIOUS when they go after people who have real money instead of the plebs.

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:20 | 1971136 midgetrannyporn
    midgetrannyporn's picture

    The big name robber barons don't have to pay back jack sheet. This is for the lumpen only.

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:21 | 1971140 legal eagle
    legal eagle's picture

    Just another reason for people of means to engage a qualified asset protection lawyer.  People cannot claw back what you do not own.  My guess it is the threat of black listing that would make people comply, if at all, and some allegation of fraud or misreprentation in their employment.

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:21 | 1971141 fnordfnordfnord
    fnordfnordfnord's picture

    Oh hell! We're screwed! There's no way the 1%-ers can give us jobs now.

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:47 | 1971272 squib
    squib's picture

    And smoke cigarettes while doing so.

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:21 | 1971142 walküre
    walküre's picture

    Sure, like that's gonna happen! The $$ is spent, blown into the wind and/or parked outside of US jurisdiction. Planes are idling and ready to depart one way into paradise for the crooks.

    At least the coverage from 3rd world tin pot dictators is brutally honest and direct to the point. The sentiment and the lack of respect for anyone else is the same there as it is on Wall Street.

    A thief is a thief is a thief!

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:22 | 1971144 bob_dabolina
    bob_dabolina's picture

    Claw this back [grabs crotch] 

    -John Corzine

     

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:37 | 1971222 willien1derland
    willien1derland's picture

    +1000 Bob...I guess they can't clawback any funds when the 'Honorable' former CEO indicates he has no idea where they went....Corzine - Totally East Coast Thug Bitchez!

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:25 | 1971161 chet
    chet's picture

    But.. but... now the "top talent" will surely flee the banks.  Each of them must be guaranteed millions per year to stick around, don't you know.  And if you can't give them millions, all the top talent leaves for greener pastures somewhere.  This is just known.  No, clawbacks won't do.

    And without the "top talent" manning the banks, where will us poor Main Street shlubs get our "financial innovation"?

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:55 | 1971316 TheFourthStooge-ing
    TheFourthStooge-ing's picture

    chet asked:

    And without the "top talent" manning the banks, where will us poor Main Street shlubs get our "financial innovation"?

    We can always cut out the middleman and just burn our paychecks.

     

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:25 | 1971162 jmcadg
    jmcadg's picture

    So Jeffries can demand bonuses back, but when the commingling is unearthed, they won't have a clue where the money's gone!

    Double standard bitchez

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:28 | 1971178 Vergeltung
    Vergeltung's picture

    how on earth could that practice even be LEGAL?!??!?!?!!?

     

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:35 | 1971213 willien1derland
    willien1derland's picture

    It is as legal as using customer segregated funds to support your firm's trades & then providing the JP Morgan SUPER PRIORITY over their claims...Truth always prevails - Thugs will be Thugs!

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:49 | 1971283 walküre
    walküre's picture

    PAYBACK is a bitch

    literally

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:30 | 1971189 Darkness
    Darkness's picture

     

     

    Looks like these bankers will have to create some new Excel models to monitize their sadness.

     

     

    Oh wait, Jefferies is on the verge of collapse.

     

     

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:32 | 1971198 willien1derland
    willien1derland's picture

    Social Darwinism remains in FULL TREND - Wall Street will now eat its own!

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:36 | 1971221 MsCreant
    MsCreant's picture

    And vomit? Or disappear into an event horizon? Or just simply die?

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 16:03 | 1971344 willien1derland
    willien1derland's picture

    +1MM - MsCreant - From your mouth to God's ears! I am not too particular so any of your suggestions would be more than acceptable...

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:34 | 1971209 beatus12
    beatus12's picture

    alittle off the theme but some Sino news via BNN,

    Sino has announced they will skip payments due in 3 days

     

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:39 | 1971235 rogersails
    rogersails's picture

    I'm not a lawyer, but I was personally involved in a case here in California (as a jury foreman) involving sales commission clawbacks.  In California, they are clearly illegal. Any lawyers want to enlighten us about the legal dimension of clawbacks ?

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 15:50 | 1971295 walküre
    walküre's picture

    If the transactions were fraudulent and the perps misappropriated client funds for their own gain.. it is totally legal.

    SEC does it all the time when they're not surfing porn.

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 16:04 | 1971348 GoodMorningMr.V...
    GoodMorningMr.VanRumpoy...'s picture

    Sounds like something a fisical sound company would do....

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 16:15 | 1971392 willien1derland
    willien1derland's picture

    A new FASB rule 'BITCHES'- BONUS IN TOTAL CIRCULAR HOLDINGS ENCUMBERED SEGREGATION- aka-->'Fully REFUNDABLE Bonuses Allowance' - the newest & fastest growing footnote to US Bank's financial reports!

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 16:32 | 1971454 AcidRastaHead
    AcidRastaHead's picture

    Remember when the bankrupt financial institutions stole our money to pay for bonuses for all those brilliant agents of insolvency?  They often repeated they needed to offer those bonuses in order to attract the best and brightest.  Turns out many of those best and brightest are actually mediocre and expendable.

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 16:45 | 1971517 s2man
    s2man's picture

    "I don't know where the money is".

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 16:47 | 1971531 rambler6421
    rambler6421's picture

    How can they legally claw back bonuses unless the firm goes bankrupt?

     

    libertarian86.blogspot.com

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 16:47 | 1971534 Smiddywesson
    Smiddywesson's picture

    This is like National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation where Chevy Chase buys a pool and then doesn't get a Christmas bonus.

    OH THE HUMANITY!  (A small tear traces its way slowly down my cheek.)

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 16:55 | 1971568 ThisIsBob
    ThisIsBob's picture

    Rich Handler is a prick.  If they treat their employees like that imagine their regard for their customers.

     

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 17:09 | 1971604 rambler6421
    rambler6421's picture

    I bet when the banking system goes bust, the bankruptcy trustee is going to claw all the dough back from the guys who took their dough out at the last minute.  Stupid Bush and his clawback provisions.

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 17:45 | 1971706 SilverRhino
    SilverRhino's picture

    With the precedent that depositors can become unsecured creditors and say BoA goes bankrupt, how do you think main street would react to seeing their last 3 months of electronic payments (housing payments, utilities, etc) clawed back from places they transmitted [for each account holder] by the trustee / bankruptcy judge?  

    I don't put ANYTHING past our 'justice' system at this point.

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 17:33 | 1971628 swani
    swani's picture

    What a joke. 

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 18:49 | 1971871 PulauHantu29
    PulauHantu29's picture

    Claw backs are not uncommon. Back in 2001 many tech companies were deducting previous bonus payments hey had made to various mid-level execs. Not too nice since many had already relied on that money.

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 19:47 | 1972045 Clowns on Acid
    Clowns on Acid's picture

    There should have been clawbacks for all of the "bankers", really Sham Wow salesmen that sold all the CDO's to pension funds. Hello Sandy Weill?

    That could not/ did not happen then, but is this the begnning of a new round of suits from lawyers for pension funds? The lawyers won't mind. the work...

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 19:55 | 1972074 Wannabee
    Wannabee's picture

    "will likely cause a substantial dent in banker spending patterns"

    Transalation: fewer watch ads in the WSJ

     

     

    Mon, 12/12/2011 - 23:26 | 1972625 duckhook
    duckhook's picture

    What about the loans that wall street people took on the paid as bonuses

    Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!