This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Jim Grant On Gold-Backed Bonds And 'The Hope Leeches'

Tyler Durden's picture




 

James Grant, of Grant's Interest Rate Observer makes some thought-provoking statements in his must-listen Bloomberg Radio interview with Tom Keene today. While noting America's exceptionalism (h/t Clint Eastwood?), he perhaps doesn't mean all Americans as he takes the Fed and Treasury to task over their actions in recent years (and in fact for decades). His long-held view that rates should be higher and follow generational cycles raises concerns for him that government intervention is in fact 'prolonging the symptoms' of the recession. In considering Tom Keene's well-thought-out question of why the US does not take advantage of low rates and issue exceptionally long-dated bonds, Grant agrees with the odd premise that they do not but then goes on to what would be sounder policy. "Why not issue bonds backed by gold bullion? Gold is a better money and is grounded in something besides the power of the people that print the dollar bills." The interview goes on to discuss population growth as a more potent 'fix' for housing in the US than QE, that the US is a preferable investment environment (given valuations) than Germany or Japan, the drastic drop in NYSE volumes, and the "leeching out of excitement, hope, and expectation of improvement (particularly for the young)." His compare and contrast of the 1920-21 depression to the current Great Recession (which seems not to end), focused on the fiscal and monetary actions, is an eye opener that its just possible the present-day orthodoxy is wrong. Urging that we maintain our sense of shock at the size of our 'peacetime' deficits, Grant worries that we are in a secular stagnation.

Click below to listen to the interview...

Jim Grant On Bloomberg Radio by user5452365

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:32 | 2157981 GeneMarchbanks
GeneMarchbanks's picture

"Why not issue bonds backed by gold bullion? Gold is a better money and is grounded in something besides the power of the people that print the dollar bills."

Better yet, why doesn't Greece do this? Does anyone believe China wouldn't finance a partially gold-backed Greek bond?

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:36 | 2158001 BobPaulson
BobPaulson's picture

Because if they do the dominos will fall faster on the outstanding funny-munny and shunt to endgame way before the rats have gotten off the boat.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:48 | 2158048 Comay Mierda
Comay Mierda's picture

Gold backed bonds? this guy must be a terrorist. call the FBI!

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 14:06 | 2158116 NotApplicable
NotApplicable's picture

I just wonder how many milliseconds it would take for the dollar to go bidless after such an announcement?

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 14:53 | 2158352 SilverIsKing
SilverIsKing's picture

Back by paper gold?

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 15:40 | 2158564 Leopold B. Scotch
Leopold B. Scotch's picture

I was waiting for Grant to point out that the Austrians have long held that the only difference between 1921 and 1930's / Great Depression was the activist policy response, and were saying the same thing in 2000-2002 when Greespan's activism sowed the seeds of the next crisis.  One crisis of mal-investment was allowed to clear, the other was frozen to avoid political pain at a variety of levels.  (And BS on those who say Hoover was a liquidationist... His policies were clearly not, what -- with all the price support policies, etc.  He was, at best, FDR-lite.)

Read Rothbard's "The American Great Depression" -- for free on .pdf if you google it.

These self-serving meddlers and the riff raff who follow them make the mistake of believing the good times were actually good times, rather than gross distortions in the market place that would inevitably implode.

Also, these cycles of intervention-to-bust were predicted to get shorter and shorter as the efficacy of policy intervention undermined the legitimate wealth producing economy.  And so it is that a cycle might last 20 years, now it's 3-4, and growing shorter.  This current boomlet is on borrowed time.

 

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 17:46 | 2159319 lasvegaspersona
lasvegaspersona's picture

How about 2 systems? One system for the debtor in all of us...we get our mortgage in fiat and we love it as it gets easier to pay off as time (and inflation ) work their magic. We save in gold (as the most flexible example) and our pile remains the same over the decades until we redeploy it for our retirement.....perfect...see?

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 22:39 | 2160304 Harlequin001
Harlequin001's picture

And you'll nevr guess what appeared just before the Weimar collapse, yup, gold backed bonds.

What goes around comes around...

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:49 | 2158050 LawsofPhysics
LawsofPhysics's picture

Wait a second, you speak as if this would be a bad thing.  Sounds to me like this is exactly what the savers, innovators and producers of real things of value are waiting for anyway.  fucking bring it.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 14:25 | 2158195 BobPaulson
BobPaulson's picture

Once again, that is why it won't happen.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:47 | 2158041 jcaz
jcaz's picture

Because they see no reason to....  The EU continues to bail them out every time they wave their hand-  Greece is confident that they're holding all the cards in this game, and so far, they've been right.

Why act when there are no consequences?  Why give up tangible assets when you don't have to?

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 14:08 | 2158121 Thomas.2012
Thomas.2012's picture

They do not bail out Greece.

They bail out the bankster around the globe via Greece!

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 15:27 | 2158478 Roger O. Thornhill
Roger O. Thornhill's picture

+1 Exactly - this whole "we're saving Greece" meme is the deception.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:48 | 2158047 slaughterer
slaughterer's picture

Can someone explain this metaphor of "hope leeches"?  It is hard for me to grasp without an example or image or number.  

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 15:33 | 2158511 Leopold B. Scotch
Leopold B. Scotch's picture

Did you listen to the interview?  The shitty situation is doing the leeching, not the hope.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 17:37 | 2159284 Imminent Crucible
Imminent Crucible's picture

Transcription error. Should have been "hope leaches out", not "leeches" as in creepy things that stick on your leg in a stagnant pond.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:53 | 2158060 resurger
resurger's picture

If this is the case, they will make sure that Greece goes bankrupt to Hoard the fucking gold!

Gold Standard is the thing needed, not bonds backed with gold. although it can work if the country has a sound financial system.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:55 | 2158076 ozziindaus
ozziindaus's picture

China would then have access to that gold through inevitable default. Greek gold is something the EU already have in their scopes.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 14:28 | 2158214 DarkestPhoenix
DarkestPhoenix's picture

Don't worry, they can share it........I'm sure it will be rehypothalamusicated.

 

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 14:31 | 2158228 CapitalistRock
CapitalistRock's picture

Governments never give up their national treasures in an effort to avoid bankruptcy. Especially gold. Read the book, "It's Different this Time". The things of greatest value are kept at all costs.

Besides, Greece's gold reserve at today's gold price is a tiny fraction of the debt they would have to issue. By asking the question it shows you do not understand the magnitude of the problem. Greece is beyond insolvent. There is no chance of them paying their debts.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 14:37 | 2158268 Bastiat
Bastiat's picture

 

Because the banksters want to lien (take) the gold on their own terms to cover their own empty vaults?

Only when they've covered themselves as much as possible will they take action to openly acknowledge that gold is the ultimate store of value.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 15:24 | 2158464 rrrr
rrrr's picture

To GeneMarchbanks: "Why not issue bonds backed by gold bullion? Gold is a better money and is grounded in something besides the power of the people that print the dollar bills."

Here is the reason that is not done: It would be to the benefit of such nations and to the people of those nations. The goal is not to benefit them, but to destroy them.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 15:28 | 2158488 GeneMarchbanks
GeneMarchbanks's picture

It's geo-political I agree. Greek people do not get to pick either their economic policy or if need be, their creditors.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 16:33 | 2158863 Whiner
Whiner's picture

I would only bankroll them Greeks if they pledged me their gold 2X face of bond. In return  i would agree not to rehypthecate it to MFG-UK 

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 16:35 | 2158875 Archon7
Archon7's picture

First of all, because if they did that, everyone knows they would be buying tungsten-backed bonds.  Secondly, it's a tacit admission that the USD is worthless paper.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:33 | 2157987 bob_dabolina
bob_dabolina's picture

Grant worries that we are in a secular stagnation.

Depression. Other than that, I have no concerns

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:37 | 2157992 SheepDog-One
SheepDog-One's picture

Another one who says 'rates must be higher'....well YEA Einstein, 0% is total BS we all know that, but as soon as they raised rates the DOW and everything else would be right back to the lows. 'Bonds backed by gold bullion'? What gold bullion is he talking about? There is no adjusting a few knobs here and there, theres only 1 way out of this and thats complete destruction of the financial world banking system.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 14:01 | 2158098 Al Huxley
Al Huxley's picture

They can NEVER raise rates again (at least not until after the entire system collapses) because the only way the current debt and deficit numbers can even pretend to be sustainable is if the interest burden is near 0. Raise rates and the crisis goes from 'looming' to 'immediate' instantly.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 17:41 | 2159298 Imminent Crucible
Imminent Crucible's picture

What's funny is that Grant has to know that. He has to know that allowing interest rates to normalize would explode the costs of servicing the federal debt.

So rates will not be allowed to rise, just as Congress will never pass another budget. The federal govt will stumble along on continuing resolutions until the wheels come off and the financial system resets.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:34 | 2157993 BobPaulson
BobPaulson's picture

The FBI is going to be after his ass for crazy seditious talk like that. Commie.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:43 | 2158029 Vince Clortho
Vince Clortho's picture

Have to wonder if Grant realizes his views on gold just made him a terrorist suspect according to the Dept of Homeland Defense.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:39 | 2158013 Beard of Zeus
Beard of Zeus's picture

"The interview goes on to discuss population growth as a more potent 'fix' for housing in the US than QE..."

Yeah, that's all we need.

Another hundred million or so poor third world peasants.

Good grief, what the hell are these people smoking?!

 

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:50 | 2158056 ozziindaus
ozziindaus's picture

I would bet these "peasants" you call have more motivation and appreciation than you think.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 14:41 | 2158290 chubbar
chubbar's picture

OK, we solve the housing issue with population growth but how about the follow on problems? Floating more bonds for schools? Police, firemen? We'd incur so many more problems (and taxes) than we'd solve that it is a ridiculous suggestion.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 15:28 | 2158487 DollarMenu
DollarMenu's picture

Maybe not so bad if there is work for this additional population.

They have to have a job to pay for the house, no?

If they are all working, paying bills, buying  furniture and x-boxes for the kids,

well it's back to high life again.

Issuing muni infrastructue bonds shold be easy.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:39 | 2158016 Dr. Gonzo
Dr. Gonzo's picture

...ah because everyone would want the gold backed debt and shun the irredemible U.S. crap. Duh.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:41 | 2158026 dwdollar
dwdollar's picture

Do I really hear Boomers crying about how bad they had/have it? Hahaha... Boohoo...

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:41 | 2158027 hack3434
hack3434's picture

The US should default on curent debts before issuing Gold backed bonds. The biggest downside to that will be getting General Tso's wink and nod.  

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:45 | 2158033 Internet Tough Guy
Internet Tough Guy's picture

No to gold bonds. No to encumbering gold with any more paper. Free gold. Freegold.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 17:45 | 2159312 Imminent Crucible
Imminent Crucible's picture

Go back to FOFOA and study the freegold concept a lot longer. Freegold allows for the simultaneous circulation of paper currency (for immediate transaction purposes) and gold (for wealth storage purposes).

The point of freegold is that it permits people to defer claims on goods and services in a form that cannot be debased by central bankers.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 18:14 | 2159425 lasvegaspersona
lasvegaspersona's picture

patience grasshopper your bifurcated spend vs savings mechanism will come but...."Just because it is inevitible does not mean it is imminent"  Doug Casey

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:45 | 2158034 resurger
resurger's picture

Bonds backboned with Gold!

I dont trust those knaves with or without gold.

 

 

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:49 | 2158052 flyonmywall
flyonmywall's picture

You can't issue bonds based on gold that has never been inventoried. First you have to do a full inventory, with metallurgical analysis, of the bars in Fort Knox. Only then you can issue the bonds.

Nobody will buy bonds backed by tungsten !

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:52 | 2158066 ozziindaus
ozziindaus's picture

If you can't trust the COMEX, why would you trust GOVEX?

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:56 | 2158078 resurger
resurger's picture

someone posted that earlier

by UP Forester

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbxwTgxPzJk

Tungesten Backed Gold

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:51 | 2158063 Plata con Carne
Plata con Carne's picture

Jim Grant is Ron Paul's pick for Fed Chairman.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 14:09 | 2158131 Idiocracy
Idiocracy's picture

And mine as well

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:54 | 2158071 OutLookingIn
OutLookingIn's picture

This can has been kicked for 96 years now!

The 'Statutory Debt Ceiling', in effect since the 'Second Liberty Bond Act' of 1917.

Since 1940 the debt ceiling has been increased 80 seperate times, 15 times in the past 10 years! Thats an increase about every 6 months on average!

"There is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion. The alternative is only whether the crisis should come sooner as the result of a voluntary abandonment of further credit expansion, or later as a final and total catastrophe of the currency system involved."

-Ludwig von Mises

"There is NO means of avoiding the final collapse..."

This can has now been kicked VERY close to the cliff edge. The next kick and...

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:55 | 2158073 Dr. Gonzo
Dr. Gonzo's picture

They WILL do something like this...after they've exhausted all the other stupid tricks that have no chance of working. Of course when they do get around to doing it the bonds won't be backed by real gold. They will be backed by imaginary gold that no one gets to see or touch. You'll just have to conjure up an image of it in your imagination when you buy the bond. Failed bankrupt kleptocracies don't let their people own gold and they certainly don't let them conduct trade in it. They'll be cool with letting them think they own imaginary gold though. Just don't stop playing the lottery and slot machines America. You're going to hit the big Pay Day any day now. I can feel it. Keep spending all your discretionary income on that instead of coins.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 13:56 | 2158082 Long-John-Silver
Long-John-Silver's picture

Paper or Physical Gold backing? What good is backing bonds with paper Gold? If the debter defaults and the bond holder can't collect his physical Gold what happens then?

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 14:08 | 2158111 Zero Govt
Zero Govt's picture

it's another paper chase isn't it?

every lunatic on the globe thinks they've got a solution to the problems, just tamper a bit here, twist a nob there... it's nothing of more substance than rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic

the real solution, the only solution, is freedom (from Govt intervention)

Let the suckers go bankrupt ..let natural order (the free market) rush back in to clense this rotten to the core economy

Freedom and the Free Market ..you can't beat it

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 14:14 | 2158155 resurger
resurger's picture

truth is a bitter pill to swallow ZG!

Here is a lackey that old timers trust:

“There’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.” – Warren Buffett, Chairman and CEO of Berkshire HAthaway



Wed, 02/15/2012 - 00:02 | 2160573 StychoKiller
StychoKiller's picture

"After you cut down the last tree, pollute the last lake and kill the last fish, you will find that you CANNOT EAT Munny!"

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 18:27 | 2159490 lasvegaspersona
lasvegaspersona's picture

ZG guy

"I love you man" 

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 14:01 | 2158091 Zero Govt
Zero Govt's picture

"..government intervention is in fact 'prolonging the symptoms' of the recession.."

Prolonging?!! . . . they're digging (furiously)

This is not a time-lag issue. We're deep in debt and these clowns/crooks are digging ever deeper at an ever faster rate... Obumma, Europe and Japan are grave diggers (ie. fuking lunatics)

Stop Paying Your Taxes

Don't Sponsor the Suckers


Tue, 02/14/2012 - 14:05 | 2158108 Every Third Word
Every Third Word's picture

Oh, population growth? Do tell Mr. Einsteins - i never would have guessed that the underlying drivers of any market or ecosystem are the participants and their intentions and actions - thanks captains obvious.

 

MORONS like Keene, and others, don't care to look at the 80s miracle, where unemployment in 7 years went from 9.x% in 1982 to 5.0% in March 1989 due to a confluence of policy events and POPULATION growth (baby boomers moving in to the work force). In sum:

1. rise of private equity thanks to relaxed regulation

2. rise of 'junk bonds' as a new form of capital

3. relaxation of tax rates

4. relaxation of corporate regulations

5. growing stock market as baby boomers piled in to 401k's.

 

Economics is not terribly difficult or Roubini would have been out of work years prior. Populations and the regulations on such persons is a key determinant of market and environment health and opportunity.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 17:54 | 2159345 Imminent Crucible
Imminent Crucible's picture

Don't throw the term "moron" around too recklessly.

The plunge in unemployment from 1982 to 1989 is a mirror of the explosion of debt at federal, state, and individual levels. I.E., it was demand pulled forward. The 1980's boom was 1% "miracle" and 99% monetary manipulation.

Boomers entering the workforce had little to do with it. The Baby Boom lasted from 1946 to 1964 by most models. Almost all of them were in the workforce before 1982. I'm a second-wave boomer and was already working in 1972.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 18:33 | 2159523 lasvegaspersona
lasvegaspersona's picture

here here

Something happened after Richard Nixon closed the gold window in 1971. One would have predicted that a purely fiat currency would crumble as they all do but SOMETHING happened. The world was able to buy oil with that 'worthless paper' and so it lived and still lives. Something happened to give the dollar life again.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 14:06 | 2158117 the grateful un...
the grateful unemployed's picture

the Fed ought to pay all bondholders in gold, assuming there is any left in the building. here you take this worthless industrial metal, and in exchange we write off all our debts? after a moment of sheepish glances, the constituents with their gold on one side and the government swindlers on the other, Bernanke gives the signal to start the printing presses again, and rolls out a new batch of fiat currency. suckerrrrrs

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 14:06 | 2158118 Vergeltung
Vergeltung's picture

I heard him this morning on the radio. I thought he was quite good. usually, it's just a blur of pumpers and hopey-changey optimism. it was refreshing to hear the truth.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 14:11 | 2158135 kito
kito's picture

so tomorrow the central bank becomes extinct (wishful thinking), there is no central authority to provide discount lending to banks. if you want to lend money, you must create enough capital for business to do it. interest rates become a function of the free market, they are now set competitively by any entity that lends money. what happens next? what are the natural outcomes?

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 14:13 | 2158149 Stuck on Zero
Stuck on Zero's picture

Am I dumb or do others concur with me ...  why ever issue bonds?  Why not save up until you have the cash and then buy whatever you want?  Issuing a bond means everything costs double or triple.  Here in California we have issued bonds for everything and guess what?  Now we can't sell bonds or build anything because all our cash goes to paying interest. 

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 14:35 | 2158260 dwayne elizando
dwayne elizando's picture

If we had true money and no bonds they say we'd be in a permanent deflation. DEFLATION IS THE DEVIL!

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 15:58 | 2158680 SAT 800
SAT 800's picture

But we had true money, and very, very, small Federal defecits; and the result was the greatest economic miracle of all time; the greatest benefit for the working classes, the greatest improvement in national wealth, etc. So, we all know what the facts are. In times of real money; ie. most of human history, prices frequently went down, sometimes during periods of increasing prosperity and good employment; there's nothing contradictory here. In the modern world of debt financing and fiat currency deflation is terrifying to the Bond Owning Class; who also happen to be the ruling class; ergo. the propaganda. Class warfare is alive and well. The program as it exists now is designed to save the Bond Owning Class, and screw over the Working Class. That;s all there is to it, really.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 14:51 | 2158336 BigJim
BigJim's picture

There are some capital purchases that it is both economic and moral to spread over time.

It can be argued that anything that is enjoyed over multiple generations (large, commerce-enabling bridges, for instance) should be paid for by all those people rather than the current (or even previous) generations.

The problem with this, of course, is that once the government gets its tentacles into everything, then everything becomes (despite the complete lack of price-discovery), an 'investment'.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 16:01 | 2158685 Dr. Acula
Dr. Acula's picture

"There are some capital purchases that it is both economic and moral to spread over time.

It can be argued that anything that is enjoyed over multiple generations (large, commerce-enabling bridges, for instance) should be paid for by all those people rather than the current (or even previous) generations."

The fact that funds are obtained over time doesn't make it economic or moral. Consider two ways that a bridge can be built:

1. An entrepeneur wants to build a bridge with his own funds as he forecasts it will obtain sufficient revenues, voluntarily paid by future generations. This is economic calculation at work. Because the revenues are raised through voluntary, mutual exchange, it is moral. If the forecast proves to be erroneous, the entrepeneur will be punished with financial losses.

2. A bureaucrat wants to build a bridge using seized funds and plans on seizing additional funds from future generations including the unborn. He will also sell bonds that enter unwilling third parties into slavery. The bureaucrat expects that this will further his career. This isn't economic calculation. It is based on political force and coercion, not economic considerations. This is neither economic nor moral. If the bridge is uneconomical, everyone suffers.

Remember, there is always That Which is Seen and That Which is Not Seen. You see the bridge long after it is built but you don't see what people could have created or built instead - were they allowed a choice.

 

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 16:00 | 2158689 SAT 800
SAT 800's picture

When you give the power to spend other peoples money to "officials", or burecrats; all hell is let loose from its moorings.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 14:15 | 2158158 New_Meat
New_Meat's picture

"... that government intervention is in fact 'prolonging the symptoms' of the recession."

Let's see, happened before in the '30s, the sainted FDR was in charge, "Great Depression" only happened in U.S., yep.

Queue the 1938 Henry Morgenthau lament.

- Ned

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 14:16 | 2158159 OutLookingIn
OutLookingIn's picture

THE OTHER NAME FOR BONDS? DEBT.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 14:18 | 2158174 dwayne elizando
dwayne elizando's picture

Would you actually receive gold with these bonds or would it just be tied to the price of gold?

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 14:41 | 2158296 JW n FL
JW n FL's picture

 

 

Jim Grant is one of the smartest historians that you can trust for very accurate information.

Those who do not know or understand history are DOOMED! too repeat it!

 


Grant's is an independent, value oriented and contrary minded journal of the financial markets.

| More

Current issue: February 10, 2012, Vol. 30, No.03

| Download Issue America's people power Love and marriage--and interest rates, too--are among the foremost drivers of nonagricultural land prices. You, Mr. or Ms. Grant's Subscriber, may or may not be a landowner, but you assuredly have an interest in the forces that push land values up or down. A primer on uninhabited acres. | Download Article America's people power

 

Download Article | Buy ($70.) | Subscribe

House of the 16 liens Not even the worst hurricane lingers over one place for more than a day or so, yet the post-Greenspan property liquidation is entering its sixth year. Longtime residents of a certain Florida island attest that, for the most part, the bear markets are worse than the hurricanes. | Download Article House of the 16 liens

 

Download Article | Buy ($70.) | Subscribe

Safety last Certified safe nowadays are bonds and buildings that yield next to nothing. Proof of just how safe they are, in fact, is how little they promise to return. Give us, instead, certifiably risky assets priced for a bad outcome, e.g., cast-off suburban office buildings valued at a steep discount to replacement cost. | Download Article Safety last

 

Download Article | Buy ($70.) | Subscribe

Wild and crazy When Agnico-Eagle suffered a production shortfall at its Nunavut, (Canada)-based Meadowbank mine last year on account of a string of accidents beginning with a wolverine and ending with a kitchen fire, it once and for all established that mining is a rugged and unpredictable business. Mindful of that truth, we undertake a review of one of the few pure-silver plays. | Download Article Wild and crazy

 

Download Article | Buy ($70.) | Subscribe

American exceptionalism? On Jan. 24, the IMF downgraded its forecast of 2012 global growth by 0.75% and its forecasts for China and India by 0.8% and 0.5%, respectively. The vehicles that were expected to drive 28% of global growth from 2012 through 2016 may be flashing "check engine" lights. | Download Article   http://grantspub.com/index.cfm

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 14:53 | 2158353 BigJim
BigJim's picture

Your links don't appear to be working

Wed, 02/15/2012 - 01:41 | 2160723 JW n FL
JW n FL's picture

 

 

http://www.grantspub.com/

Sorry!

Try that one.. it leads you to the stuff above.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 15:00 | 2158370 PaperBear
PaperBear's picture

"Bloomberg Radio interview" ?

Something wrong with Bloomberg Television ?

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 15:04 | 2158390 kito
kito's picture

Grant worries that we are in a secular stagnation.

thats it? he doesnt worry about the end of fiat shortly?

or a catastrophic collapse?

stagnation is really the optimists view...........

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 15:06 | 2158392 Pancho Villa
Pancho Villa's picture

If there is one thing that is worse than paper gold, it is paper gold issued by a heavily indebted government.

The US didn't honor the gold and silver certificates that it previously issued. Why would anyone expect them to honor gold bonds?

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 15:51 | 2158635 SAT 800
SAT 800's picture

Ding! Ding! we have a winner; someone is thinking straight. They have no credibility for any rational person who has studied their historical performance; and if you didn't study.  Oh, well.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 15:19 | 2158436 rrrr
rrrr's picture

For two reasons, on a national level, sound monetary policy is not engaged in: Those in charge of spending feel free to spend as much as they want to, without responsibility, and can't be stopped, and because the intention of the Fed has nothing to do with the well-being of the nation or the public but is to wage an insidious war of destruction against our nation and ourselves, the main weapon of which is economic in nature.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 15:24 | 2158462 JFK.4PREZ
JFK.4PREZ's picture

It is valentines day so I must announce it:  I <3 James Grant.   His bowtie makes his opinion so venerable.  

Wed, 02/15/2012 - 01:42 | 2160727 JW n FL
JW n FL's picture

 

 

Luv that name and the Flag too boot! FANTASTIC!

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 15:40 | 2158569 Likstane
Likstane's picture

Jimmy Grant or anybody else who thinks Gold-backed bonds wil be backed by metal is living in a fantasy land.  People are basically liars and thieves.  The only money that exists is gold and silver.  Anything else is just a broken promise waiting to happen.  If you have no metal, you will have no money soon. 

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 15:47 | 2158609 SAT 800
SAT 800's picture

The question he poses is so "Alice in Wonderland"; "Why not issue Gold Backed Bonds, it's better money"; it's difficult to believe anyone doesn't know the answer to this question. The issuer of a Bond will never issue in a better money; if a less good money is available. Does he imagine that the Government is his friend, or something? What an idea.  I thumbed up your comment because it's always useful to put the truth out there one more time; there's always the chance it'll start a newbie thinking, what will I have left in my US$ savings account?; and this is socially useful.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 16:26 | 2158826 mirac
mirac's picture

Who's to say how much gold the US has.  You need an audit for that, which hasn't been done in eons.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 16:40 | 2158901 Silversinner
Silversinner's picture

I do not lend my gold to any gouvernment and do

not buy into an other promise of gold into the future.

Keep my savings into real gold and silver and only

exchange them for real good and services.

I will spend my own money do not need a 

government to do that for me.

Thanks but no thanks.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 17:19 | 2159164 lasvegaspersona
lasvegaspersona's picture

Every time I listen to smart guys like Grant I put their observations and opinions into the FOFOA model. When what they say starts getting fuzzy I think...if they used FOFOA's point of view this would be clearer. After 2 years of 'paying attention' to the global financial mess and many more years of mindless investing I must say that I believe the only guy getting it ALL right is that FOFOA guy. Until proven wrong I'll continue to use his 'system to evaluate what I see happening.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 19:04 | 2159645 DoChenRollingBearing
DoChenRollingBearing's picture

+ $55,000

FOFOA is the rock of gold analysts now.

 

fofoa.blogspot.com

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 19:02 | 2159637 I should be working
I should be working's picture

FUN FACT: Treasury bonds once were backed by gold. There was a clause that FDR removed stating that the holder could demand the debt be paid in gold not dollars.

Tue, 02/14/2012 - 20:31 | 2159937 Problem Is
Problem Is's picture

Grant underestimates the impact of Wall Street criminal fraud on recovery and growth in his assessments... mentions not a word of it...

From fraudulent securitizations, to HFT market rigging, to massive insider trading, to accounting balance sheet fraud at the TBTFs, to out right theft by JPM at MF Global...

Until the fraudsters are jailed and the frauds restrained... there can be no sustained recovery...

Wed, 02/15/2012 - 02:11 | 2160767 ruffles
ruffles's picture

iCulture!

Not to be confused with the iCulture S, where the S stands for Serfdom, and is really only marginally different than the original (current and bestselling) iCulture

Wed, 02/15/2012 - 08:34 | 2161094 Archduke
Archduke's picture

gold bugs argue that, unlike fiat or barter, Au holds a constant marginal utility.

I'm not sure that's efficient or even desirable in terms of promoting progress.

 

I think we should aim for something better.  If we are to match a geometric growth,

which is the only sane way to map price and wealth distribution with rising population,

we need a money backed by something that actually has increased marginal utility.

 

look to energy. if you spend energy on making a machine, a business venture, or

any kind capital creating process the corollary is that you will require more energy

to use it, feed it, market it.  higher energy order dictates that energy begets more

energy.

 

it's the perfect proxy for human agency.  the more we spend it, the more we discover

new reasons to spend it.  in many ways the petrodollar is already backed by energy,

but this needs to be refined to include all sorts of non fossil fuel sources and most

especially the utility of specific orders of energy, such as cooled computational power.

 

 

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!