This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

The Media Admits To Ignoring Ron Paul

Tyler Durden's picture



Why? Because if "the unelectable one" were to become president, the financial kleptocratic, oligarchic status quo, which just so happens is the big legacy media's biggest advertising base, would be wiped out overnight. Next up: big media becomes very small media. The clip below from CNN explains it all.

As for the reason why Bachmann took first, one picture speak a thousand words:

h/t John and Travis


- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Sun, 08/14/2011 - 15:44 | 1559364 BaBaBouy
BaBaBouy's picture

RP: Buy Gold ...

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 15:55 | 1559402 doggings
doggings's picture

Fox news pulled his poll from the website when he won easily too. blatent.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 16:01 | 1559422 BaBaBouy
BaBaBouy's picture


PLEASE KEEP CIA, Aig operatives away from RP...


Ebay Special GOLD Section


Gold and silver sales on eBay had already been rising steadily over the past several years -- so much so that eBay Inc. created a special area in May to make it easier for buyers to find sellers.

Now, activity on that part of the site, the Bullion Center, is intensifying as consumers unnerved by the economic uncertainty flock to gold in hopes it will be a stable investment.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 16:04 | 1559430 Smiddywesson
Smiddywesson's picture

Thank you BaBa, this is another canary in the coal mine that I will track.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 21:34 | 1560274 Fish Gone Bad
Fish Gone Bad's picture

I can't believe Randy Travis is such a whore.  That is... why that is downright un-American. 

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 16:19 | 1559477 Hive Raid
Hive Raid's picture

"Ron Paul will cause the next holocaust."

- actual quote from a Jew on an article yesterday

Why is Ron Paul unelectable, while Bachmann is a frontrunner? Simple. Bachmann is a traitor, loyal to Israel, the Jewish banking oligarchy, and the Jewish mainstream media oligarchy. Ron Paul is a patriotic American, who would prioritize the needs of Americans over the Jews.

Jews will use their control of the West to prevent him from winning, legally or illegally. And if by some miracle he wins... they'll do him like they did JFK--the last president to threaten the Jewish federal reserve bank.

Ugly truth, but the elephant in the room has been getting fatter and shitting on all the furniture. Can't sit comfortably any more.


Sun, 08/14/2011 - 16:39 | 1559539 Libertarians fo...
Libertarians for Prosperity's picture

I'm currently working on an article about Ron Paul and have discovered that virtually ALL the hate groups endorse him.  All the groups that represent white supremacists and bigots love this guy. 

Anyone know why?  When certain groups associate themselves with a particular party, the reasons are usually obvious.  I can understand why Wall Street and evangelical Christians love republicans.  I can understand why union members and "the working class" love democrats.  And I can understand why constitutionalists and sink-or-swim, social darwinists love Ron Paul. 

But I don't understand why the hate groups love him.  Anyone got any insight on this one?


Sun, 08/14/2011 - 16:46 | 1559561 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

A possibility is that Paul is the candidate for the pseudo out of the system wannabees... If those people think they are ignored by the system while they are within the system, then Paul fits the bill to be their candidate.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 16:54 | 1559583's picture

So calling for rule of law and adherence to the Constitution makes one a "pseudo out of the system wannabee?" Doesn't that strike you as a rather convoluted bit of reasoning?

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 16:56 | 1559591 HungrySeagull
HungrySeagull's picture

Actaully the Consitution allows the People to dissolve the bad and make a new Government.

But apparently left it up to the People the proper method for doing so.


And now I am hearing shit about the Electorate college being disposed of and super congress?

I think not.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:11 | 1559635 whstlblwr
whstlblwr's picture

What hate groups endorse Ron Paul? Please name them so we can decide if we agree with premise.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:21 | 1559666 Saxxon
Saxxon's picture

Anyone who questions the the position of the United States vis-a-vis Israel is a supporter of hate groups and probably a crypto-Nazi as well.

One look at Bachmann's reptillian eyes, shining with power, is enough for me.  Circle the wagons boys, the empire is in its last generation, right here.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:26 | 1559685 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

And haters who hate queers, fags, lizards, negroes and the rest are also no haters.

Feeling towards this kind of people are part of the human nature and therefore, any of these groups are unfairly labelled as haters.

In the end, no hate groupe support Ron Paul. Supporting Ron Paul is enough to dismiss the possibility of being a hater.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:46 | 1559736 damage
damage's picture

It is pretty obvious why white supremecists or "hate groups" might vote for Ron Paul. He will respect their freedom of speech and their right to make whatever rules they wish to make on their own property. 

Neither I or Ron Paul supports the agenda of these people. But we do still believe their rights should be protected as long as they don't harm anyone else.


Anyways, go back to thedailyPoS and dickride Obama some more, trolls.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:52 | 1559761 Libertarians fo...
Libertarians for Prosperity's picture

Do you know of any republican or democrat congressmen who have voiced a desire to repeal the 1st Ammendment?

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:06 | 1559776 damage
damage's picture

All of them, more or less, pass laws which directly conflict with the first amendment. They appoint judges who will rewrite the constitution. (the senators)


They still prosecute federal obscenity cases even though it is obviously unconstitutional for multiple reasons. Also pretty much all the Democrats and Republicans voted to make posession of those "Crush Videos" a federal crime. The federal government still prosecutes porn even under president Obama who has a great deal of influence over the DoJ.


So, yes.


Also, your avatar is perfect since I'm sure your idol is FDR, America's pre-hilter proto-fascist.

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 19:07 | 1563359 rich_wicks
rich_wicks's picture

I kind of doubt that "crush videos" are what the foundings of this nation were thinking about protecting when they composed the 1st amendment.

I think they were trying to protect the right of people to protest the government and to practice religion as they saw fit.  The fact that pornography and sadism is being protected, but peopel have to be consigned to "free speech zones" and that political assemblies are being filtered is an absolute abmination.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 19:27 | 1560020 Dangertime
Dangertime's picture

Nobody actually voices repealing it.

They just do it.



Sun, 08/14/2011 - 19:56 | 1560088 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Exactly.  Which of them has spoken out against the abomination that is the "free speech zone"?

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 22:52 | 1560441 A Nanny Moose
A Nanny Moose's picture

Bingo Tmos.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 20:15 | 1560131 Miss anthrope
Miss anthrope's picture

Ron Paul is just scum, He wants us out of the wars so we can spend our money here and not on the MIC.  He wants to shut down the fed so we don't have to pay the stupid Rothschilds interest into the next 5 generations,  He wants the money to stop inflating so that the raise I didn't get last year or the year before that doesn't affect my standard of living and run it into the toilet.  Ron Paul believes in freedom........ I tell you Ron Paul is a LOSER. 

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 20:25 | 1560152 G. Marx
G. Marx's picture

McCain-Feingold bill and all those who voted for it and the president who signed it, 'nuff said.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 23:56 | 1560578 Judge Holden
Judge Holden's picture

"I wish we could find a way to hold people accountable. Free speech is a great idea, but we’re in a war." - The Hideous Lindsey Graham

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 19:04 | 1563346 rich_wicks
rich_wicks's picture

Yes, anybody that signed the Patriot Act.

Which you obviously haven't read.

Actions speak louder than words.  Fuck it, the country is doomed, get over it.  In the next election, the country will just get another president that continues the status quo, whether they are elected or not, is immaterial.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:36 | 1559710 HungrySeagull
HungrySeagull's picture

There are not many left on the wagons, they have been dead and buried along the great trail over the last decades as they lived out thier free lives bought and paid for by the blood on the tree.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:24 | 1559676 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

There was that Randy Gray guy and his group...

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 19:16 | 1559997 damage
damage's picture

Sorry, I for some reason got you mixed up with someone else, so ignore my below comments. ;)

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:22 | 1559670 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

Probably for some.

It is clear that some people do think that the US achievements come from the application of the US constitution, not of a selective dismissal of it.

There has been no rule of law in the US other than US rule of law type.

US citizens have dismissed themselves the Constitution.

This, of course, since the beginning of the system.

So yeah, it makes these people think they are out of the system. They are only pseudo out of the system people though. But the appearances are enough for US citizens, arent they?

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:48 | 1559750 damage
damage's picture

DailyPoS is

that way -------->



Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:03 | 1559797 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

US citizens sense of direction and localization:

"We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat."

WMDs never to be found in Iraq.

Never trust a US citizen giving a location.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:08 | 1559812 damage
damage's picture

No one gives a shit. Have fun when half of your democrat buddies jump ship and help us vote in Ron Paul for president in 2012!

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:12 | 1559821's picture



I resigned my seat on the local Democratic Committee in 2008 so that I could register Republican and vote for Ron Paul in the PA primary.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:19 | 1559851 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

My democrat buddies? You mean the Obamaniacs?

Sure, sure.

funny how US citizens naturally associate speech with belonging to a certain group.

That is the way it is in this US driven world.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:26 | 1559872 damage
damage's picture

Well considering you show up on every Ron Paul post it seems pretty obvious what your agenda is when you start vomiting left-inspired propaganda.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 19:07 | 1559983 Maxter
Maxter's picture

Wait wait,  "no WMD found in Iraq" is left propaganda??  Saying the Iraq war is a big farce is left propaganda? 

You know that Ron paul doesn't support all those wars ?

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 19:42 | 1559989 damage
damage's picture

LOL Oops, sorry... for some reason I mixed up AnAnonymous with some troll...

That's what I get for not reading a comment before I reply to it!

I thought he was implying something else as I was speed-reading comments... no I do not think there were WMD's in Iraq... but I do think I need to read comments better before responding to them.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 19:50 | 1560054 damage
damage's picture


Sun, 08/14/2011 - 20:50 | 1560210 TwelfthVulture
TwelfthVulture's picture

Yes I do realize that Ron Paul is against the wars.  I also realize, which you seem not to, that Saddam most certainly DID possess WMD's.  The weapons inspectors were not just there to insure that he did not develop nuclear weapons (which he did not) but to also verify that the biological and chemical weapons which he DID possess were destroyed as provided for under UN mandate.  Those biological and chemical weapons were provided to Iraq by the US.  I'll say it again, we know he had them (wmd's) because we gave them to him.

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 05:15 | 1560838 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

More cheap propaganda. So Iraq had WMDs. They destroyed. The US claimed it was not the case and there were WMDs. They were going to prove it. Result : no WMDs.

It confirms that just as Iraq said, they had destroyed WMDs.

US citizens know no limits and they still want people to believe that the origins of issues in this US world order should be unknown, ignored or cast on scapegoats.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:28 | 1559877 TwelfthVulture
TwelfthVulture's picture

Like many, you only remember the last talking point they gave you.  If you were really paying attention you would know that Iraq did indeed possess WMD's.  Remember, it was Ronnie Reagan through Donald Rumsfeld who sold them to Saddam since he was our proxy in his war against Iran.  You shouldn't be afraid that Bush started a war and didn't find WMD's.  You should be terrrified that Bush didn't find the WMD's.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 19:23 | 1559984 damage
damage's picture

No one gives a shit, fuck Bush!


disclaimer: I did not read the above comment either...


Sun, 08/14/2011 - 23:00 | 1560453 Cathartes Aura
Cathartes Aura's picture

yer a voter, amirite?

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 22:09 | 1560331 rambo1028
rambo1028's picture

And another layer is peeled from the onion. It's amazing how well their propaganda works. I believed it when they said they had WMD and I believed it just as much when they said they didn't have any. Thanks for opening my eyes even further twelfth.

Sometimes I wish I could go back to was so much simpler then. But once your eyes are opened, there it's no going back. Exactly why we Ron Paul folks are so passionate and active trying to get more people to open their eyes to what is right in front of them.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 23:15 | 1560494 Rick64
Rick64's picture

The British under Thatcher sold to both the Iranians and Iraqis. Her son brokered many of the arms deals in the ME.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:05 | 1559617 macholatte
Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:52 | 1559760 azusgm
azusgm's picture

Outstanding! Thanks for posting that link.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 19:01 | 1559967 foofoojin
foofoojin's picture

At about 2:38 mark when he says "thats because of partisanship" I could of sworn I heard parties 'n shit.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:46 | 1559656 whstlblwr
whstlblwr's picture

We're not pseudo out of the system wannabees. And right now we both strongly support Ron Paul. Doing well, have jobs. We support Ron Paul because we are concerned about the country and future of the country.

What is your idea? What do you care about? Trash the dollar more? More debt? Come on, how are you in the system? What does that even mean?

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 23:03 | 1560458 Cathartes Aura
Cathartes Aura's picture

whoopsie whstlblwr!!  you forgot your persona, the broken english one. . .

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 23:18 | 1560501 Rick64
Rick64's picture

 Its miraculous how his english has improved in just a few days. Incredible!  Rosetta Stone?

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 16:51 | 1559579's picture

So that's your entry for best straw man? Seems a little scrawny.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 16:54 | 1559588 HungrySeagull
HungrySeagull's picture

Little Morgan Horse won the log pull. The Shires and other big horses could not compete.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:13 | 1559828's picture

Well that was an entertaining story. What's up next, My Pet Goat?

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 16:56 | 1559589 sun tzu
sun tzu's picture

Stick your head back up Al Sharpton's ass to find your dreaded racist boogeyman

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 16:58 | 1559594 Debt Rolling
Debt Rolling's picture


"I can understand why Wall Street and evangelical Christians love republicans."

Wall Street overwhelmingly supported Barack H. Obama in 2008. 

"Although the Democratic presidential hopeful has vowed to raise capital gains and corporate taxes, financial industry bigs have contributed almost twice as much to Obama as to GOP rival John McCain, a Daily News analysis of campaign records shows."

"I can understand why union members and "the working class" love democrats. "

Not me. And in fact, those who vote Democrat today tend to be superior middle class/elite educated White bohemians. The poor, if you exclude ethnic minorities, favor the Republicans.  

"But I don't understand why the hate groups love him.  Anyone got any insight on this one?"

"Hate" groups, like every outsider group not in a position of power, oppose central governments power. They also know that their chances of election are relatively slim. It's normal they switch, by default, to the man that can unvoluntarily help them the most by reducing government intermingling. 


Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:24 | 1559675 Libertarians fo...
Libertarians for Prosperity's picture

Wall Street and republicans go together like peanut butter and jelly, or libertarians and canned beans.

The only reason Obama got so much money from Wall Street in 2008 is because it was overwhelmingly obvious he would win the election.  With the banking system totally imploding, and the survival of investment banking at stake, Wall Street wanted to ensure their survival.  And, of course, they did.  

those who vote Democrat today tend to be superior middle class/elite educated...

I'm not sure why the educated, smart, hard-working middle class is voting democrat these days.  I'll have to look into it.

 The poor, if you exclude ethnic minorities, favor the Republicans....

Not sure this is true.  If it is, I think the poor are voting Republican because they're usually less educated, very gullible and easy to manipulate and fool.  Republicans have managed to capture their vote by diverting their attention with god, guns, gays and rhetoric about Obama being a Muslim terrorist, the reincarnation of Hitler, and all sorts of idiotic fear-mongering. Amazingly, these poor people are being led by the nose on social issues and not realizing that they're voting against ideologies that the poor would actually benenfit from. 


Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:18 | 1559714 whstlblwr
whstlblwr's picture

You seem to show up on Ron Paul posts so I'm guessing that you're someone from the progressive side who is worried about Democrats voting for Paul. I think you should be worried.

I voted for Obama, campaigned for him, gave him money (wife of whstlblwr, should get own avatar I guess) and now I'm going to vote for Paul...even with his pro-life position. The nuclear Iran thing kind of threw us, but we are worried enough about debt and the value of the dollar that we want to support him. With a child and more to come I just can't imagine how anyone with children can support the status quo.

Also what about Obama's endless support for Wall Street? How can progressive Democrats still support him? He gave taxpayer money to Wall Street but wouldn't even consider the public option in the health care plan.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:41 | 1559912 trav7777
trav7777's picture

You're an idiot...nobody should care what you think

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 19:22 | 1560012 Rossalgondamer
Rossalgondamer's picture

As are you.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 19:34 | 1560033 Robot Traders Mom
Robot Traders Mom's picture

@Trav-What he said was many multiples more coherent than anything you have ever said. If you are going to troll, try to at least be funny.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 20:43 | 1560197 Grainium
Grainium's picture

Hey Pot, does this kettle look black to you?

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:41 | 1559720 Invisible Hand
Invisible Hand's picture

I hate ad-hominem remarks but...

Could you cram any more stupid remarks into one short post?  Maybe, but I don't know how.

Maybe instead of people voting their "best interests," one might suggest that they vote for people most likely to maintain the right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness," instead of for those most likely to increase the flow of other people's money to the apparatchiks and their tame parasites.

But it you did that, you couldn't recommend that they vote Democratic, could you?

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:53 | 1559767 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

The right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness come among unalienable rights. Should not people  vote for people who are also the most likely to maintain the other rights?

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 22:02 | 1560307 mayhem_korner
mayhem_korner's picture

What are the "other rights"?  Do people have a right to the yield of their labor? Do people have a right to certain services or living standards, even if that can only be effected by a transfer from others - or is that an infringement on the the transferers' liberty? Is the potential to be offended a right to be protected - or does it infringe on a right to free speech or the free exercise of religion?  Is transparency of public affairs a right of the citizenry?

When you peel back the labels (like 'haters,' 'democrats,' 'liberatians,' and of course your favorite 'US citizen'), the core of political discourse is about what people define as "rights."  So I'm interested in what exactly you mean by "other rights" and what other "unalienable rights" there are, as you state that life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are "among unalieanable rights."

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 02:12 | 1560745 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

Funny US citizens. No limits.

I am now a US Founding Father. Great.

I recalled. Nothing more. The Founding Fathers stated that the three come among other rights.

US citizens design natural rights theory so now I am in charge of filling the blank?

What a sense of responsibility. Messing up stuff and the others are in charge for cleaning the mess.

Bankers do not behave the way they do because they are bankers but because they are US citizens.

It is a common feature for US citizens to socialize losses and privatize profits.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:04 | 1559798 tommus
tommus's picture

voting for "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" is like trading the markets to "ensure efficient price discovery"

if you aren't voting "in your best interest" you are fooling yourself.

wisdom is knowing what your "best interests" really are.


Sun, 08/14/2011 - 21:14 | 1560245 dhengineer
dhengineer's picture

Wall street is crawling with Democrats.  I work as a private chef in a household where the husband is very highly placed in a Wall Street bank.  He is as much a democrat as it is possible to be.  He attends all of the Obammy $35k a plate dinners, he visits the White house regularly (he is fast friends with several of the dirtbags in the administration), he and his entire family were active in the 2008 campaign, first for Hillary and then for Barry, and his kid got a job (fresh out of harvard and yale law) in the White House.  All of the execs of the bank are democrats.  And they are all very very disappointed with barry.  They feel betrayed and confused.  Oh, yeah, the idea of Rick Parry running for president absolutely scares the shallots out of them....

Wall street full of republicans?  How 1930...

For the record, I am a political agnostic, but I tend toward the Ron Paul types.

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 00:09 | 1560598 sun tzu
sun tzu's picture

I think the poor are voting Republican because they're usually less educated, very gullible and easy to manipulate and fool. 

So you're telling me all those people in the inner cities of Detroit, Harlem, southside chicago all voted for John McCain? You fucking moron.


I'm not sure why the educated, smart, hard-working middle class is voting democrat these days.  I'll have to look into it.

Stick your head back up your ass and I'm sure you'll find a few more nuggets of wisdumb

The only reason Obama got so much money from Wall Street in 2008 is because it was overwhelmingly obvious he would win the election. 

Most of that money came well before he defeated Clinton in the primaries, you stupid shit. The only reason he beat her was the flood of money from Wall Street.

Wall Street and republicans go together like peanut butter and jelly

Of course. We know Chuck Schumer, robert Rubin, Tim Geithner, and Chris Dodd are Republicans, right. Another one up your ass, you limp-wristed moron.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:03 | 1559614 FEDbuster
FEDbuster's picture

Just guessing that those groups might enjoy the idea of smaller government, given that most hate the federal government as much as the other people they "hate".  Ron Paul is all about letting people do their own thing as long as it doesn't hurt other people.  So if I am part of a group of white supremacists whom want to live in the woods of Idaho, and want nothing to do with supporting blacks, hispanics or illegals in Kalifornia, Ron Paul would be the best guy for me.  Dr. Paul would let Idaho do what they do and Kalifornia do what they do, but the federal tax structure and laws would not force one to support the other or be the "same" as the other state.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:06 | 1559621 vened
vened's picture

The most prominent hate groups such as $PLC, ADL, AIPAC, La Raza, etc. all endorse Democraps or neoconish RINOs.


Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:15 | 1559648 TwelfthVulture
TwelfthVulture's picture

I would not be surprised if one day we all find out obongo was really a KKK plant.  Pure genius.  Think about it for a moment, after his completely incompetent performance how willing will America be to elect another black president.  Think Mayor Dinkins.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:47 | 1559740 vened
vened's picture

obongo and dickens were picked by jooz using their complete control of media/finance/government systems.


Who controls US economy?


Of the sixty(60) senior officials of the U.S. Government economic, financial, and monetary institutions, thirty-eight(38) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 63%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the senior officials of the U.S. Government economic, financial, and monetary institutions by a factor of 31.5 times(3,150 percent).


Who controls Media?


Of the twelve(12) senior executives of the “Big Six” media corporations, ten(10) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 83%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the “Big Six” media corporations by a factor of 41.5 times(4,150 percent).


Who controls White House?

Of the seven(7) current and former senior advisors of President Barack Obama, five(5) are Jews or partial Jews. This is a numerical representation of 71%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the current and former senior advisors of President Barack Obama by a factor of 35.5 times(3,550 percent).


see lots more on the same site...

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:50 | 1559757 FEDbuster
FEDbuster's picture

When the whole system collapses, the response will be "what did you expect from the first black president?"  But the real answer is much deeper than most are willing to dig for., with the exception of most Zerohedgers whom seem to know the true villains in this crime.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:42 | 1559918 trav7777
trav7777's picture

the KKK?  You mean all 3 of them?  They installed Obama?

Why do you suppose people of all races avoid blacks?  Just don't like melanin?

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 01:09 | 1560694 TheBadgersSett
TheBadgersSett's picture

close to my thoughts. Wouldnt surprise me if Obama was shoed in to preside over the imminent financial catastrophe so that he be made the scapegoat and the Jewish controlled corporate universe will never fail to subtely allude to (the last Black president) should one ever be silly enough to run again.He is the perfect villain for the powers that be and it offers them further longevity in the shape of the sheeple never daring to try something new again.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:12 | 1559640 Max Hunter
Max Hunter's picture

virtually ALL the hate groups endorse him. 

Can you give a source for this?  Maybe two.. Should be easy.. Since ALL the hate groups endorse him..

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:25 | 1559684 Libertarians fo...
Libertarians for Prosperity's picture

I will in a couple of hours when I get home - it's stored on my home computer.  Until then, just Google Ron Paul hate groups.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:31 | 1559697 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

Why bother?

The answer is already known: those hate groups are not hate groups. Because no hate groups can support Ron Paul.

Feeding propagandists with facts is useless.

Propagandists do not see facts as an opportunity to readjust their perception of reality. They only see facts as material to work with in order to support a preset conclusion.

The conclusion is known: no or few hate groups support Ron Paul. So the spin on what groups are hate groups is going to happen.


Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:47 | 1559745 Max Hunter
Max Hunter's picture

I'm sorry...  I was unaware that only those that identify hate groups are the only ones capable of defining hate groups... indeed... nice try though.. It sounded smart.. kinda... Why don't you go try to word fuck someone that will give it consideration.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:24 | 1559863 whstlblwr
whstlblwr's picture

I imagine most hate groups don't support any candidates. Aren't they mostly the vote with bullet crowd?

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 00:12 | 1560603 sun tzu
sun tzu's picture

According to the fuckwit liberals, any group that doesn't bow before Lord Messiah Obama and crown him as the second coming is a hate group.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 22:39 | 1560410 tmosley
tmosley's picture

More than 4 hours later and he never posted a shred of evidence.  I am shocked, SHOCKED I tell you to find out that this guy is a disingenuous troll.

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 00:31 | 1560602 Libertarians fo...
Libertarians for Prosperity's picture is the most popular white trash, neo-nazi, white supremacist website around. Not only does it endorse Ron Paul, but it helps promote his infamous "Money Bomb" campaign donations for him.

Google: Ron Paul,

Google: David Duke and Ron Paul

Google: Don Black and Ron Paul

Google: League of the South, Thomas DiLorenzo and Ron Paul

Randy Gray is the Michigan coordinator for the Ron Paul campaign.  He's also a prominent KKK member.  

And the apple doesn't fall far from the tree...  Do you know who Christopher Hightower is?  He's the director of communications for Rand Paul.  He's also the guy who posted "Happy Nigger Day" on his Facebook page on MLK Day. 

The examples are endless. My apologies that this is a few hours later than you were hoping.  Unlike you, I don't spend my entire day on the internet.  


Mon, 08/15/2011 - 06:24 | 1560867 Sophist Economicus
Sophist Economicus's picture

Do hate groups not support Obama?    Is Reverend Wright not a hate preaching pastor?   If someone writes 'Happy Nigger Day' on your facebook page, are you responsible for their actions?    Do you just believe everything you google search without trying to understand why it was written, who wrote it, what was the source, etc...


You FAIL on so many levels, you have no credibility here troll -- go back to your liberal rag and tell them you've been found out.   Time for a new identity

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 08:43 | 1561091 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Three of your "examples" are the same organization, and I don't see any evidence of a two way connection.  Again, you are using association to disparage someone you don't like.  This is because you are a douchebag.

Thomas DiLorenzo is not associated with Ron Paul beyond the fact that RP called him to testify before congress.  BFD.  Lots of people have been called before congress.  Does that mean the witnesses are all buddy-buddy with those who called them?

Randy Gray is NOT the Michigan coordinator for the RP campaign, you lying shitstain.  He WAS the Midland, Michigan COUNTY coordinator for the RP campaign.  You know what it takes to become a county coordinator for a republican candidate in Michigan?  Nothing.  You sign up on a fucking website.

And look, now you lie about Christopher Hightower!  He did NOT post "Happy Nigger Day" on his Facebook.  Someone else did.  You are a fucking liar.

It's not the examples that are endless.  It's the length you go to to lie and slander those you disagree with that is endless.  You are scum.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:30 | 1559671 macholatte
macholatte's picture

But I don't understand why the hate groups love him

Please list/name these "hate groups" you reference and tell us who/what labeled them a "hate group", what is the criteria that defines a "hate group" and the source of your data that shows that they "support" a particular candidate.


Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:46 | 1559738 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

Ah, and there is also the other possibility of spin: some hate groups are missing.

So hate groups are not hate groups and some true hate groups are missing.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:02 | 1559793 macholatte
macholatte's picture

I'm asking the guy who posted the remark, not you. So butt the fuck out!

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:06 | 1559805 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

No kidding? Have I spoilt your incoming fun in denying that hate groups that support Ron Paul are hate groups?

US world order.

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 00:14 | 1560610 sun tzu
sun tzu's picture

What is your definition of a hate group? What line do they have to cross before they become a hate gorup? Would you consider the Black Panthers or MeChA as a hate gorup? How about La Raza?

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 02:15 | 1560747 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

If they support Paul, they are no hate groups. If they dont support Paul, they are hate groups.

US world order.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:47 | 1559741 Popo
Popo's picture

Uh... Dude, that argument is probably not the way to go.

But Stormfront and the KKK for starters. You going to tell us those aren't hate groups now?

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:55 | 1559774 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

Paultards will if those groups support Paul.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 20:55 | 1560220 Miss anthrope
Miss anthrope's picture

i support any american the right to hate anyone they want to hate.  It was a free country until the communists took over.  Look around.  By the way , Hitler,  which government branch send you your monthly check.  ????  really?

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 05:48 | 1560850 smore
smore's picture

"i support any american the right to hate anyone they want to hate."

Exactly!  The right to hate is the right to free thought.  This is the core issue that the leftist politically correct crowd don't understand. 

In their minds, to come to a negative conclusion about any group of people is a thought crime.  If the only permitted thoughts are "positive", simply being human is a criminal act.

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 00:16 | 1560614 sun tzu
sun tzu's picture

0botards will claim the Black Panthers and MeCha aren't hate groups. You left-wing assholes are running scared because your welfare train is about to derail. Stop hating Ron Paul you fucktards

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:13 | 1559829 macholatte
macholatte's picture

I'm not argueing, I'm asking for information. No judgement calls from me so I'm not going to tell you anything about KKK or NAACP or Media Matters or any of them. Maybe the guy does have a valid data base. Maybe he did his homework. Maybe he drank too much Kool-Aid. He said he'd post the information later today. I'm good with that. I have an open mind and a beverage.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:24 | 1559868 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

If you have that a demand, why not perform it for yourself?

As you reject the common denomination of hate groups as hate groups, and prefer to make your own listing, this guy can not meet your demand.

Do your own research with the list you consider as hate groups because obviously this guy works from data commonly accepted.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:34 | 1559892 Optimusprime
Optimusprime's picture

"common denomination of hate groups"




Please. Do not think that repeating PC nonsense counts as making a point here.  Have you ever heard of the Frankfurt School? The California F Scale?  The project to pathologize patriotism, family, traditional values generally?


Do you think that SPLC is a "hate group"?  Or the ADL?  Or AIPAC?  Or are these just the groups that have arrogated to themselves the authority to name the haters?  Sounds pretty hateful to me.  And definitely has a suspicious tribal origin.  Wake up.


Get a clue.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 21:30 | 1560264 Hugh G Rection
Hugh G Rection's picture

The Southern Poverty Law Center is the essence of a hate group.  ADL, AIPAC... you kidding?


Get a clue?


Google dancing Israelis.  Who was arrested on the GW bridge with a van full of explosives on 9/11?  Mossad is a greater threat to our safety than any Arab boogeyman AlCIAda can dream up.


"It is no measure of mental health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society."

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 01:14 | 1560707 TheBadgersSett
TheBadgersSett's picture

awesome quote at the end there. nice.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:44 | 1559925 trav7777
trav7777's picture

Jewish hate groups are the arbiter of who a hate group is.

Jewish organizations such as NAACP, SPLC, and ADL make the definitions

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 19:08 | 1559985 whstlblwr
whstlblwr's picture

What? Not George Soros?

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 20:29 | 1560162 ItsEvolutionBaby
ItsEvolutionBaby's picture

damn straight trav. the ADL is a terrorist organization

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 00:18 | 1560616 sun tzu
sun tzu's picture

Wrong you left-wing fucktard. The person who makes the accusation is responsible for proving it. You can't call someone a racist and demand that they prove they are not a racist. I expected your liberal fuckwads to play the race card, but not so soon. You free shit army maggots must be running scared

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 02:19 | 1560751 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

Actually, and this will shock US citizens, who are hooked on power and deep into the "perception commands reality" (like conmen and conjurors), controversial claims require evidences. Not statement of obvious facts. But again, US citizens are duplicitous, so they might find easily reasons to dismiss obvious facts as they would want them to be true only if they believe the facts to be true.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:48 | 1559742 Id fight Gandhi
Id fight Gandhi's picture

Black hate groups suppose Obama so what's your point?

The most so called hateful thing he could do is tell Israel, figure out your own problems. We really don't need another Israel backed pawn here.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:56 | 1559779 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

And that one too. Just a variant though. Not all hate groups support Paul. Evidence: some hate group support another candidate.

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 00:38 | 1560655 baby_BLYTHE
baby_BLYTHE's picture

Black Panthers intimadate Republican voters outside Philadelphia polling station using bully clubs 

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:00 | 1559787 Hive Raid
Hive Raid's picture

Uh Ohhhh....  he's breaking out all the hot-button buzzwords! "white supremacists... bigots... social darwinists"  "haaaate"!!! 

Better hit all those emotional anchors to make sure nobody clicks on the links I provided, lest they catch a whiff of the truth. You know how it goes with truth... it has a certain ring to it. It tends to spread. 

To answer your question, I don't know because I'm an independent American who's watched his country be destroyed, and had the audacity to look into who is responsible. The answer is there for all who choose to see it.

Since you HATE (*!*ring ding ding ding *!*  :0  **!) the truth so much, we'll do another one:

Your response was predictable given this link and the others, no?

Fact is, we needed Ron Paul 100 years ago. I may vote Obama this time just to hasten the inevitable. I wonder what your people plan to do when the system is down and people start seriously asking who is responsible. This has happened over 80 times in the past few centuries.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:19 | 1559848 Libertarians fo...
Libertarians for Prosperity's picture

we needed Ron Paul 100 years ago...

You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

Can you tell me a little about the American economy prior to 1913, American banking history prior to 1913, stability of the banking system prior to 1913, and the distribution of wealth prior to 1913?

Or, how about the middle class?  How did the middle class fare in the 50 years before the Fed?

Pick one question.  Pick all of them.  Whatever.   


Sun, 08/14/2011 - 19:23 | 1560014 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Yes, let's examine the economy 100 year ago, and compare it to the 100 years before that.  Then compare it to the 100 years before that.

Free market ideology lifted the world from abject slavery.  Lying hypocrites such as yourself LOVE to point to the inequities of the industrial revolution as evidence, nay PROOF POSITIVE that free markets are evil.  Of course, you see child labor, but you never question what those children would have been doing 100 years before (toiling to death on farms as serfs).  You pay attention to the absolute levels, and ignore the delta of wealth distribution.  That is, we went from a nobility that owned everything to an emerging middle class.  

And you then get to hide in the fact that the "mixed" economic system introduced in 1913 didn't fully exert itself for a very long time after it was initiated.  At least when the Communists came, you could tell the difference immediately.  Instead, we have been left to boil like frogs in a pot.

I'm sure those bubbles are just doomer libertarians passing gas from their canned beans.  No need to look at the thermometer.  Just drift off to sleep like a good froggie.

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 02:23 | 1560756 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

You pay attention to the absolute levels, and ignore the delta of wealth distribution. That is, we went from a nobility that owned everything to an emerging middle class.

Ah, so there was a free market economy before. The same one that was propelled by furious expansion and slavery.

Going to be very hard to mimick the results. Expansion is entering the stage of no more expansion available and slavery is out dated for most because no one needs to trap workers in their work but everyone needs to fire them.

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 08:49 | 1561105 tmosley
tmosley's picture

There was a free market in the North from the 1830's-1860's, and there was a free market throughout the country from the 1880's-1910's.  Again, you are conflating the free market with what came BEFORE it.  The free market CURED slavery, by making it obsolete.  Slavery is not an efficient way to deal with labor, because the incentives are all screwed up/non-existent.

Honestly, you are a moron for not understanding this.  Good job on not comparing time periods to each other like I said you should and instead relying on the same stupid arguments I decried in the very post you replied to.

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 00:21 | 1560619 sun tzu
sun tzu's picture

So you're saying that the 11 years of the Great Depression under the Fed was a period of stability? You fucking dimwits are hilarious

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:01 | 1559789 Libertarian777
Libertarian777's picture

Probably because they don't understand his message like 99% of everyone.

E.g. Wanting to remove the civil rights act doesn't mean he's racist. It means he doesn't believe government should have the power to tell you want todo or who to hire. What gets lost in the translation is it works both ways. The government should never have had the power tonenforce Jim Crow laws in the first place, son when RP wants to repeal things like the civil-rights act, he would have repealed Jim crow laws too and rolled back the state.

If RP was in power in the 60's he'd have passed legislation allowing black people to own and run black only buses. Note, it wouldn't have been a mandate for a black only bus, but removal of free market restrictions on individuals (be they black, white, Indian or Asian) from engaging in free commerce. So white people could ride their white only buses, and black people would get the same services from someone else.

In the same vein if a shopkeeper didn't want to serve black people there would be no law preventing that. By the same token there would be no law preventing the black guy from buying a shop and serving black people. People forget that there was no free market and blacks were not allowed the same private property rights as white people. RP fights for individual freedom, not collective freedoms.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:11 | 1559820 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture


And Paul would have voted laws to allow fish to fly, men to breathe in deep outer space and stuff like that...


Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:20 | 1559855 Max Hunter
Max Hunter's picture

Boy.. Your sarcasm is so convincing, I must say, I will now take your side of the argument.. because you are so good at insulting people and gaining support without even providing silly things like facts..  I think I went to JR High with about 30 people like you..

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:26 | 1559874 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

Gaining support? From whom? For what?

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:48 | 1559934 trav7777
trav7777's picture

Nobody would want to ride on a black-only bus, jfc.  And blacks farejump as a rule so such a system would go bk immediately.

Without white people to leech off of, blacks' societies quickly revert back to African norms

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 19:17 | 1559998 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Trav has apparently never ridden the bus.  Here's a hint, they are quite often "all-black" affairs.  And everyone pays their toll.  Again you demonstrate your stupidity.  You can't get on a bus without paying the toll.  There is a driver there to enforce it.  

Did I mention that you are an idiot?

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 21:11 | 1560241 Miss anthrope
Miss anthrope's picture

sorry tmosley, i respect you immensely, but i HAVE ridden the bus, and usually it's the blacks jumping the fare by entering the back door while the paying people are getting in the front and the riders are exiting the back..  I used to not be a racist........ and then i moved to a large southern city.  Now, I don't want to support their lifestyle any longer.  My best friend was black growing up.  But things are different now. 

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 06:22 | 1560866's picture

My best friend was black growing up.

What is she now, an Eskimo?

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 08:56 | 1561133 Miss anthrope
Miss anthrope's picture

Crockett:  she is now dead of an anneurhysm. God rest her beautiful soul

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 09:03 | 1561151's picture



Don't you mean, "God give her wings to jump the turnstile in Heaven?"

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 09:18 | 1561178 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Edit: nevermind.  It's early.  I see now that this comment was a jarring attack against the above posters newfound racism.

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 11:41 | 1561668's picture




I hate the smell of friendly fire in the morning.

Tue, 08/16/2011 - 03:48 | 1564468 mkkby
mkkby's picture

My neighbor is a bus driver, who experiences this on a daily basis.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:37 | 1559900 slymon
slymon's picture

The democrats dont support him him but you said virtually ALL hate groups? Heck, the other biggest hate group, the republicans don't support him either. What is a hate group anyway?

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 00:24 | 1560629 sun tzu
sun tzu's picture

His definition of a hate gorup is anyone who doesn't bow down to 0bama and the Federal Reserve thieves

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:38 | 1559905 Moe Howard
Moe Howard's picture

So you classify the Federal Reserve and Neocons as love groups?

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:41 | 1559913 Dangertime
Dangertime's picture

I am fairly certain the Black Panthers do not support Ron Paul....

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 21:07 | 1560238 nmewn
nmewn's picture

Those two "cats" weilding clubs at the polls in Philly were closeted Ron Paul supporters?

Whats called for here is some strong leadership.

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 00:26 | 1560637 sun tzu
sun tzu's picture

Not only that, but the dimwit claims that all the people walking around with their pants on the ground in Detroit, Baltimore, Harlem, and Oakland are hard-core Republicans who voted for John McCain over 0bama.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:51 | 1559940 anynonmous
anynonmous's picture

by Libertarians fo...

get lost troll

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 19:14 | 1559994 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Wow, people who rely on the First Amendment for their very existence support a constitutionalist?

I wonder why that could be?

But hey, you keep trying to discredit those you fear by associating them with undesirable elements.  After all, the man who disagrees with what you say, but would defend your right to say it to the death is clearly just a libertarian whack-job, right?

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 19:43 | 1560044 Rynak
Rynak's picture

You aren't "working" nor investigating anything - you're just making up invented lies as you go, troll.

For those considering this post too much of an assumption, check his track, by clicking on his nick, and then choosing "track". He's a regular and constant troll on ZH:

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 22:29 | 1560382 caconhma
caconhma's picture

"Libertarians" with "the Hitler face". It is quite interesting.

These "Libertarians" must be members of Israili Mossad or some "American friends of Israel".

These "Libertarians" writes: "I'm currently working on an article about Ron Paul".  Yes indeed, it must be a full-time, well financed & paid by "Friends of Israel" job. 

It is another perfect example of dirty and disgusting Zionist propaganda! Well, what else is new in America?


Mon, 08/15/2011 - 08:30 | 1561055 MFL8240
MFL8240's picture

Certainly not just proved that!

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 00:13 | 1560605 Michael
Michael's picture

Because Dr Ron Paul is for freedom of thought and association for all American Citizens?

As opposed to you who want to give those freedoms only to a select few?

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 08:16 | 1561026 johnQpublic
johnQpublic's picture

i remember as a child, hippy types coming to our door campaigning against richard nixon

found out later they were in nixons employ



same thing

Mon, 08/15/2011 - 08:28 | 1561050 MFL8240
MFL8240's picture

Before you write anything on the "working class" recordnizes that the original "working class" were manuafturing jobs and they are now gone.  The poor and lazy who want handouts like the socialsit Pelosi policies, there is no "working class" per se.


Pauls represents America in its purest form and that is the attraction, we are  all sick of what this country has turned into in the hands of a judiciary who makes up their own rules based upon party afiliation and politicians what are raping the sytem with fake smiles on their faces.

Wed, 08/17/2011 - 12:27 | 1569186 younkint
younkint's picture

Still waiting on that list of "hate groups"...

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:23 | 1559665 Cassandra Syndrome
Cassandra Syndrome's picture

And Ron Paul is affiliated to the Ludwig Von Mises Institute and the Austrian School of Economics. Mises and Murray Rothbard, who is credited by many to be real Zen master of the Austrian School, were Jews. 

So bang goes that stupid Jewish conspiracy theory.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:24 | 1559866 Caviar Emptor
Caviar Emptor's picture

Yes. And William Shatner must be a big co-conspirator I'm sure. Really Big. 

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 19:50 | 1560069 Rynak
Rynak's picture

Divide and conquer: It's not about global cleptocracy - it's about ethnicity, with no logical basis at all except of at most culture, rather than race. Shoot yourself in the foot today! Become a fucking braindead racist, ready to be publically discounted for a reason!

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:34 | 1559704 HungrySeagull
HungrySeagull's picture

Not just shitting but also using logs and such outside to get off on during one hour exercise time.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:42 | 1559723 Robbie4
Robbie4's picture

Wow! This is a very scary post Hive Raid. Generalising like you do, was exactly what one very infamous individual did, about 75 years ago. And we all know how that ended.

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 18:49 | 1559937 trav7777
trav7777's picture

Who, Oscar Wilde?

Sun, 08/14/2011 - 17:59 | 1559762 High Plains Drifter
High Plains Drifter's picture

bachmann is very, very dangerous. she even lived on a kibbutz at one time. she basically worships jews because she thinks God tells us to do that, which is absurd......a woman like this in office with her finger on the button and her headache problems and her midlife crazies going on, would be extremely dangerous to be the president of the united states....

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!