The Media Admits To Ignoring Ron Paul
Why? Because if "the unelectable one" were to become president, the financial kleptocratic, oligarchic status quo, which just so happens is the big legacy media's biggest advertising base, would be wiped out overnight. Next up: big media becomes very small media. The clip below from CNN explains it all.
As for the reason why Bachmann took first, one picture speak a thousand words:
h/t John and Travis
(18 votes)
»
- Login or register to post comments
- 24358 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:
- Another Victory For Ron Paul Who Wins 44.9% In California Straw Poll To Perry's 29.3%, Bachmann's 7.7%
- Democrats: Here’s How to Force President Obama to Debate Endless War, Assaults on Our Freedom and the Out-Of-Control Fed
- Bachmann Wins Ames Straw Poll With 29% Of Vote, Ron Paul Takes Second With 28%
- In A CNN Interview, Ron Paul Discusses The Media's Blackout Of His Presidential Candidacy, And Many Other Things
- Jon Stewart On The Ron "13th Floor In A Hotel" Paul Media Blackout
RP: Buy Gold ...
Fox news pulled his poll from the website when he won easily too. blatent.
PLEASE KEEP CIA, Aig operatives away from RP...
Ebay Special GOLD Section
Gold and silver sales on eBay had already been rising steadily over the past several years -- so much so that eBay Inc. created a special area in May to make it easier for buyers to find sellers.
Now, activity on that part of the site, the Bullion Center, is intensifying as consumers unnerved by the economic uncertainty flock to gold in hopes it will be a stable investment.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Sales-of-gold-up-on-eBay-amid-apf-26890073...
Thank you BaBa, this is another canary in the coal mine that I will track.
I can't believe Randy Travis is such a whore. That is... why that is downright un-American.
"Ron Paul will cause the next holocaust."
- actual quote from a Jew on an article yesterday
Why is Ron Paul unelectable, while Bachmann is a frontrunner? Simple. Bachmann is a traitor, loyal to Israel, the Jewish banking oligarchy, and the Jewish mainstream media oligarchy. Ron Paul is a patriotic American, who would prioritize the needs of Americans over the Jews.
Jews will use their control of the West to prevent him from winning, legally or illegally. And if by some miracle he wins... they'll do him like they did JFK--the last president to threaten the Jewish federal reserve bank.
Ugly truth, but the elephant in the room has been getting fatter and shitting on all the furniture. Can't sit comfortably any more.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnrOGO8cVC4
http://www.prometheism.net/library/CultureOfCritique.pdf
I'm currently working on an article about Ron Paul and have discovered that virtually ALL the hate groups endorse him. All the groups that represent white supremacists and bigots love this guy.
Anyone know why? When certain groups associate themselves with a particular party, the reasons are usually obvious. I can understand why Wall Street and evangelical Christians love republicans. I can understand why union members and "the working class" love democrats. And I can understand why constitutionalists and sink-or-swim, social darwinists love Ron Paul.
But I don't understand why the hate groups love him. Anyone got any insight on this one?
A possibility is that Paul is the candidate for the pseudo out of the system wannabees... If those people think they are ignored by the system while they are within the system, then Paul fits the bill to be their candidate.
So calling for rule of law and adherence to the Constitution makes one a "pseudo out of the system wannabee?" Doesn't that strike you as a rather convoluted bit of reasoning?
Actaully the Consitution allows the People to dissolve the bad and make a new Government.
But apparently left it up to the People the proper method for doing so.
And now I am hearing shit about the Electorate college being disposed of and super congress?
I think not.
What hate groups endorse Ron Paul? Please name them so we can decide if we agree with premise.
Anyone who questions the the position of the United States vis-a-vis Israel is a supporter of hate groups and probably a crypto-Nazi as well.
One look at Bachmann's reptillian eyes, shining with power, is enough for me. Circle the wagons boys, the empire is in its last generation, right here.
And haters who hate queers, fags, lizards, negroes and the rest are also no haters.
Feeling towards this kind of people are part of the human nature and therefore, any of these groups are unfairly labelled as haters.
In the end, no hate groupe support Ron Paul. Supporting Ron Paul is enough to dismiss the possibility of being a hater.
It is pretty obvious why white supremecists or "hate groups" might vote for Ron Paul. He will respect their freedom of speech and their right to make whatever rules they wish to make on their own property.
Neither I or Ron Paul supports the agenda of these people. But we do still believe their rights should be protected as long as they don't harm anyone else.
Anyways, go back to thedailyPoS and dickride Obama some more, trolls.
Do you know of any republican or democrat congressmen who have voiced a desire to repeal the 1st Ammendment?
All of them, more or less, pass laws which directly conflict with the first amendment. They appoint judges who will rewrite the constitution. (the senators)
They still prosecute federal obscenity cases even though it is obviously unconstitutional for multiple reasons. Also pretty much all the Democrats and Republicans voted to make posession of those "Crush Videos" a federal crime. The federal government still prosecutes porn even under president Obama who has a great deal of influence over the DoJ.
So, yes.
Also, your avatar is perfect since I'm sure your idol is FDR, America's pre-hilter proto-fascist.
I kind of doubt that "crush videos" are what the foundings of this nation were thinking about protecting when they composed the 1st amendment.
I think they were trying to protect the right of people to protest the government and to practice religion as they saw fit. The fact that pornography and sadism is being protected, but peopel have to be consigned to "free speech zones" and that political assemblies are being filtered is an absolute abmination.
Nobody actually voices repealing it.
They just do it.
Exactly. Which of them has spoken out against the abomination that is the "free speech zone"?
Bingo Tmos.
Ron Paul is just scum, He wants us out of the wars so we can spend our money here and not on the MIC. He wants to shut down the fed so we don't have to pay the stupid Rothschilds interest into the next 5 generations, He wants the money to stop inflating so that the raise I didn't get last year or the year before that doesn't affect my standard of living and run it into the toilet. Ron Paul believes in freedom........ I tell you Ron Paul is a LOSER.
McCain-Feingold bill and all those who voted for it and the president who signed it, 'nuff said.
"I wish we could find a way to hold people accountable. Free speech is a great idea, but we’re in a war." - The Hideous Lindsey Graham
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/lindsay-graham-on-koran-burning-freedom...
Yes, anybody that signed the Patriot Act.
Which you obviously haven't read.
Actions speak louder than words. Fuck it, the country is doomed, get over it. In the next election, the country will just get another president that continues the status quo, whether they are elected or not, is immaterial.
There are not many left on the wagons, they have been dead and buried along the great trail over the last decades as they lived out thier free lives bought and paid for by the blood on the tree.
There was that Randy Gray guy and his group...
Sorry, I for some reason got you mixed up with someone else, so ignore my below comments. ;)
Probably for some.
It is clear that some people do think that the US achievements come from the application of the US constitution, not of a selective dismissal of it.
There has been no rule of law in the US other than US rule of law type.
US citizens have dismissed themselves the Constitution.
This, of course, since the beginning of the system.
So yeah, it makes these people think they are out of the system. They are only pseudo out of the system people though. But the appearances are enough for US citizens, arent they?
DailyPoS is
that way -------->
US citizens sense of direction and localization:
WMDs never to be found in Iraq.
Never trust a US citizen giving a location.
No one gives a shit. Have fun when half of your democrat buddies jump ship and help us vote in Ron Paul for president in 2012!
I resigned my seat on the local Democratic Committee in 2008 so that I could register Republican and vote for Ron Paul in the PA primary.
My democrat buddies? You mean the Obamaniacs?
Sure, sure.
funny how US citizens naturally associate speech with belonging to a certain group.
That is the way it is in this US driven world.
Well considering you show up on every Ron Paul post it seems pretty obvious what your agenda is when you start vomiting left-inspired propaganda.
Wait wait, "no WMD found in Iraq" is left propaganda?? Saying the Iraq war is a big farce is left propaganda?
You know that Ron paul doesn't support all those wars ?
LOL Oops, sorry... for some reason I mixed up AnAnonymous with some troll...
That's what I get for not reading a comment before I reply to it!
I thought he was implying something else as I was speed-reading comments... no I do not think there were WMD's in Iraq... but I do think I need to read comments better before responding to them.
.
Yes I do realize that Ron Paul is against the wars. I also realize, which you seem not to, that Saddam most certainly DID possess WMD's. The weapons inspectors were not just there to insure that he did not develop nuclear weapons (which he did not) but to also verify that the biological and chemical weapons which he DID possess were destroyed as provided for under UN mandate. Those biological and chemical weapons were provided to Iraq by the US. I'll say it again, we know he had them (wmd's) because we gave them to him.
More cheap propaganda. So Iraq had WMDs. They destroyed. The US claimed it was not the case and there were WMDs. They were going to prove it. Result : no WMDs.
It confirms that just as Iraq said, they had destroyed WMDs.
US citizens know no limits and they still want people to believe that the origins of issues in this US world order should be unknown, ignored or cast on scapegoats.
Like many, you only remember the last talking point they gave you. If you were really paying attention you would know that Iraq did indeed possess WMD's. Remember, it was Ronnie Reagan through Donald Rumsfeld who sold them to Saddam since he was our proxy in his war against Iran. You shouldn't be afraid that Bush started a war and didn't find WMD's. You should be terrrified that Bush didn't find the WMD's.
No one gives a shit, fuck Bush!
disclaimer: I did not read the above comment either...
yer a voter, amirite?
And another layer is peeled from the onion. It's amazing how well their propaganda works. I believed it when they said they had WMD and I believed it just as much when they said they didn't have any. Thanks for opening my eyes even further twelfth.
Sometimes I wish I could go back to sleep....life was so much simpler then. But once your eyes are opened, there it's no going back. Exactly why we Ron Paul folks are so passionate and active trying to get more people to open their eyes to what is right in front of them.
The British under Thatcher sold to both the Iranians and Iraqis. Her son brokered many of the arms deals in the ME.
SHOWDOWN: Rubio Torches Kerry on Senate Floorhttp://nation.foxnews.com/marco-rubio/2011/07/30/showdown-rubio-torches-kerry-senate-floor
Outstanding! Thanks for posting that link.
At about 2:38 mark when he says "thats because of partisanship" I could of sworn I heard parties 'n shit.
We're not pseudo out of the system wannabees. And right now we both strongly support Ron Paul. Doing well, have jobs. We support Ron Paul because we are concerned about the country and future of the country.
What is your idea? What do you care about? Trash the dollar more? More debt? Come on, how are you in the system? What does that even mean?
whoopsie whstlblwr!! you forgot your persona, the broken english one. . .
Its miraculous how his english has improved in just a few days. Incredible! Rosetta Stone?
So that's your entry for best straw man? Seems a little scrawny.
Little Morgan Horse won the log pull. The Shires and other big horses could not compete.
Well that was an entertaining story. What's up next, My Pet Goat?
Stick your head back up Al Sharpton's ass to find your dreaded racist boogeyman
"I can understand why Wall Street and evangelical Christians love republicans."
Wall Street overwhelmingly supported Barack H. Obama in 2008.
"Although the Democratic presidential hopeful has vowed to raise capital gains and corporate taxes, financial industry bigs have contributed almost twice as much to Obama as to GOP rival John McCain, a Daily News analysis of campaign records shows."
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2008/06/30/2008-06-30_barack_ob...
"I can understand why union members and "the working class" love democrats. "
Not me. And in fact, those who vote Democrat today tend to be superior middle class/elite educated White bohemians. The poor, if you exclude ethnic minorities, favor the Republicans.
"But I don't understand why the hate groups love him. Anyone got any insight on this one?"
"Hate" groups, like every outsider group not in a position of power, oppose central governments power. They also know that their chances of election are relatively slim. It's normal they switch, by default, to the man that can unvoluntarily help them the most by reducing government intermingling.
Wall Street and republicans go together like peanut butter and jelly, or libertarians and canned beans.
The only reason Obama got so much money from Wall Street in 2008 is because it was overwhelmingly obvious he would win the election. With the banking system totally imploding, and the survival of investment banking at stake, Wall Street wanted to ensure their survival. And, of course, they did.
those who vote Democrat today tend to be superior middle class/elite educated...
I'm not sure why the educated, smart, hard-working middle class is voting democrat these days. I'll have to look into it.
The poor, if you exclude ethnic minorities, favor the Republicans....
Not sure this is true. If it is, I think the poor are voting Republican because they're usually less educated, very gullible and easy to manipulate and fool. Republicans have managed to capture their vote by diverting their attention with god, guns, gays and rhetoric about Obama being a Muslim terrorist, the reincarnation of Hitler, and all sorts of idiotic fear-mongering. Amazingly, these poor people are being led by the nose on social issues and not realizing that they're voting against ideologies that the poor would actually benenfit from.
You seem to show up on Ron Paul posts so I'm guessing that you're someone from the progressive side who is worried about Democrats voting for Paul. I think you should be worried.
I voted for Obama, campaigned for him, gave him money (wife of whstlblwr, should get own avatar I guess) and now I'm going to vote for Paul...even with his pro-life position. The nuclear Iran thing kind of threw us, but we are worried enough about debt and the value of the dollar that we want to support him. With a child and more to come I just can't imagine how anyone with children can support the status quo.
Also what about Obama's endless support for Wall Street? How can progressive Democrats still support him? He gave taxpayer money to Wall Street but wouldn't even consider the public option in the health care plan.
You're an idiot...nobody should care what you think
As are you.
@Trav-What he said was many multiples more coherent than anything you have ever said. If you are going to troll, try to at least be funny.
Hey Pot, does this kettle look black to you?
I hate ad-hominem remarks but...
Could you cram any more stupid remarks into one short post? Maybe, but I don't know how.
Maybe instead of people voting their "best interests," one might suggest that they vote for people most likely to maintain the right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness," instead of for those most likely to increase the flow of other people's money to the apparatchiks and their tame parasites.
But it you did that, you couldn't recommend that they vote Democratic, could you?
The right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness come among unalienable rights. Should not people vote for people who are also the most likely to maintain the other rights?
What are the "other rights"? Do people have a right to the yield of their labor? Do people have a right to certain services or living standards, even if that can only be effected by a transfer from others - or is that an infringement on the the transferers' liberty? Is the potential to be offended a right to be protected - or does it infringe on a right to free speech or the free exercise of religion? Is transparency of public affairs a right of the citizenry?
When you peel back the labels (like 'haters,' 'democrats,' 'liberatians,' and of course your favorite 'US citizen'), the core of political discourse is about what people define as "rights." So I'm interested in what exactly you mean by "other rights" and what other "unalienable rights" there are, as you state that life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are "among unalieanable rights."
Funny US citizens. No limits.
I am now a US Founding Father. Great.
I recalled. Nothing more. The Founding Fathers stated that the three come among other rights.
US citizens design natural rights theory so now I am in charge of filling the blank?
What a sense of responsibility. Messing up stuff and the others are in charge for cleaning the mess.
Bankers do not behave the way they do because they are bankers but because they are US citizens.
It is a common feature for US citizens to socialize losses and privatize profits.
voting for "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" is like trading the markets to "ensure efficient price discovery"
if you aren't voting "in your best interest" you are fooling yourself.
wisdom is knowing what your "best interests" really are.
Wall street is crawling with Democrats. I work as a private chef in a household where the husband is very highly placed in a Wall Street bank. He is as much a democrat as it is possible to be. He attends all of the Obammy $35k a plate dinners, he visits the White house regularly (he is fast friends with several of the dirtbags in the administration), he and his entire family were active in the 2008 campaign, first for Hillary and then for Barry, and his kid got a job (fresh out of harvard and yale law) in the White House. All of the execs of the bank are democrats. And they are all very very disappointed with barry. They feel betrayed and confused. Oh, yeah, the idea of Rick Parry running for president absolutely scares the shallots out of them....
Wall street full of republicans? How 1930...
For the record, I am a political agnostic, but I tend toward the Ron Paul types.
So you're telling me all those people in the inner cities of Detroit, Harlem, southside chicago all voted for John McCain? You fucking moron.
Stick your head back up your ass and I'm sure you'll find a few more nuggets of wisdumb
Most of that money came well before he defeated Clinton in the primaries, you stupid shit. The only reason he beat her was the flood of money from Wall Street.
Of course. We know Chuck Schumer, robert Rubin, Tim Geithner, and Chris Dodd are Republicans, right. Another one up your ass, you limp-wristed moron.
Just guessing that those groups might enjoy the idea of smaller government, given that most hate the federal government as much as the other people they "hate". Ron Paul is all about letting people do their own thing as long as it doesn't hurt other people. So if I am part of a group of white supremacists whom want to live in the woods of Idaho, and want nothing to do with supporting blacks, hispanics or illegals in Kalifornia, Ron Paul would be the best guy for me. Dr. Paul would let Idaho do what they do and Kalifornia do what they do, but the federal tax structure and laws would not force one to support the other or be the "same" as the other state.
The most prominent hate groups such as $PLC, ADL, AIPAC, La Raza, etc. all endorse Democraps or neoconish RINOs.
I would not be surprised if one day we all find out obongo was really a KKK plant. Pure genius. Think about it for a moment, after his completely incompetent performance how willing will America be to elect another black president. Think Mayor Dinkins.
obongo and dickens were picked by jooz using their complete control of media/finance/government systems.
Who controls US economy?
Summary:
Of the sixty(60) senior officials of the U.S. Government economic, financial, and monetary institutions, thirty-eight(38) are Jews. This is a numerical representation of 63%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the senior officials of the U.S. Government economic, financial, and monetary institutions by a factor of 31.5 times(3,150 percent).
http://thezog.wordpress.com/who-controls-the-economy/
Who controls Media?
Summary:
Of the twelve(12) senior executives of the “Big Six” media corporations, ten(10) are Jews or have Jewish spouses. This is a numerical representation of 83%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the senior executives of the “Big Six” media corporations by a factor of 41.5 times(4,150 percent).
http://thezog.wordpress.com/who-controls-big-media/
Who controls White House?
Summary:
Of the seven(7) current and former senior advisors of President Barack Obama, five(5) are Jews or partial Jews. This is a numerical representation of 71%. Jews are approximately 2% of the U.S. population.* Therefore Jews are over-represented among the current and former senior advisors of President Barack Obama by a factor of 35.5 times(3,550 percent).
http://thezog.wordpress.com/who-controls-the-white-house/
see lots more on the same site...
When the whole system collapses, the response will be "what did you expect from the first black president?" But the real answer is much deeper than most are willing to dig for., with the exception of most Zerohedgers whom seem to know the true villains in this crime.
the KKK? You mean all 3 of them? They installed Obama?
Why do you suppose people of all races avoid blacks? Just don't like melanin?
close to my thoughts. Wouldnt surprise me if Obama was shoed in to preside over the imminent financial catastrophe so that he be made the scapegoat and the Jewish controlled corporate universe will never fail to subtely allude to (the last Black president) should one ever be silly enough to run again.He is the perfect villain for the powers that be and it offers them further longevity in the shape of the sheeple never daring to try something new again.
Can you give a source for this? Maybe two.. Should be easy.. Since ALL the hate groups endorse him..
I will in a couple of hours when I get home - it's stored on my home computer. Until then, just Google Ron Paul hate groups.
Why bother?
The answer is already known: those hate groups are not hate groups. Because no hate groups can support Ron Paul.
Feeding propagandists with facts is useless.
Propagandists do not see facts as an opportunity to readjust their perception of reality. They only see facts as material to work with in order to support a preset conclusion.
The conclusion is known: no or few hate groups support Ron Paul. So the spin on what groups are hate groups is going to happen.
I'm sorry... I was unaware that only those that identify hate groups are the only ones capable of defining hate groups... indeed... nice try though.. It sounded smart.. kinda... Why don't you go try to word fuck someone that will give it consideration.
I imagine most hate groups don't support any candidates. Aren't they mostly the vote with bullet crowd?
According to the fuckwit liberals, any group that doesn't bow before Lord Messiah Obama and crown him as the second coming is a hate group.
More than 4 hours later and he never posted a shred of evidence. I am shocked, SHOCKED I tell you to find out that this guy is a disingenuous troll.
Stormfront.org is the most popular white trash, neo-nazi, white supremacist website around. Not only does it endorse Ron Paul, but it helps promote his infamous "Money Bomb" campaign donations for him.
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t818365/
Google: Ron Paul, Stormfront.org
Google: David Duke and Ron Paul
Google: Don Black and Ron Paul
Google: League of the South, Thomas DiLorenzo and Ron Paul
Randy Gray is the Michigan coordinator for the Ron Paul campaign. He's also a prominent KKK member.
And the apple doesn't fall far from the tree... Do you know who Christopher Hightower is? He's the director of communications for Rand Paul. He's also the guy who posted "Happy Nigger Day" on his Facebook page on MLK Day.
The examples are endless. My apologies that this is a few hours later than you were hoping. Unlike you, I don't spend my entire day on the internet.
Do hate groups not support Obama? Is Reverend Wright not a hate preaching pastor? If someone writes 'Happy Nigger Day' on your facebook page, are you responsible for their actions? Do you just believe everything you google search without trying to understand why it was written, who wrote it, what was the source, etc...
You FAIL on so many levels, you have no credibility here troll -- go back to your liberal rag and tell them you've been found out. Time for a new identity
Three of your "examples" are the same organization, and I don't see any evidence of a two way connection. Again, you are using association to disparage someone you don't like. This is because you are a douchebag.
Thomas DiLorenzo is not associated with Ron Paul beyond the fact that RP called him to testify before congress. BFD. Lots of people have been called before congress. Does that mean the witnesses are all buddy-buddy with those who called them?
Randy Gray is NOT the Michigan coordinator for the RP campaign, you lying shitstain. He WAS the Midland, Michigan COUNTY coordinator for the RP campaign. You know what it takes to become a county coordinator for a republican candidate in Michigan? Nothing. You sign up on a fucking website.
And look, now you lie about Christopher Hightower! He did NOT post "Happy Nigger Day" on his Facebook. Someone else did. You are a fucking liar. http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/72823-the-ugly-paper-tr...
It's not the examples that are endless. It's the length you go to to lie and slander those you disagree with that is endless. You are scum.
Please list/name these "hate groups" you reference and tell us who/what labeled them a "hate group", what is the criteria that defines a "hate group" and the source of your data that shows that they "support" a particular candidate.
Ah, and there is also the other possibility of spin: some hate groups are missing.
So hate groups are not hate groups and some true hate groups are missing.
I'm asking the guy who posted the remark, not you. So butt the fuck out!
No kidding? Have I spoilt your incoming fun in denying that hate groups that support Ron Paul are hate groups?
US world order.
What is your definition of a hate group? What line do they have to cross before they become a hate gorup? Would you consider the Black Panthers or MeChA as a hate gorup? How about La Raza?