Merkel Goes For The Nuclear Mutual Assured Destruction (But Mostly Suicide) Option

Tyler Durden's picture

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Irish66's picture

navels?? outward or inward

TrafficNotHere's picture

I am seeing little signs here and there which points to both Germany and France working towards the reintroduction of the deutshe marc (and probably the franc). I think they are buying for time, playing the markets / politics to get the euro as high as possible and then will convert over. At this point, they have to realize the euro is doomed and the best hope is to get out first and to heck with the rest.

DarkAgeAhead's picture

My uneducated guess is that Germany's best option is to be the first to bail.

Comay Mierda's picture

All she needs say - "If you dont bailout Greece, I will show you my tits!"

she will get all the money she needs

Gavrikon's picture

Eye bleach!!!  For God sake's, I need EYE BLEACH!!!

Max Hunter's picture

"My uneducated guess is that Germany's best option is to be the first to bail."

The first one out of the pool gets a spot in the Taxi home..

bernorange's picture

Unfortunately, it seems the Eurozone has been pimping the idea of centralized global economic management for so long now that I can't help but wonder if the crisis won't be used to finally effect that NWO end goal. The recent announcements by Brazil and China that they are willing to fund bailouts through the IMF makes me wonder if the BRICs are making a move for more control of the IMF.

Pool Shark's picture

 

 

THERE WILL BE TANKS IN THE STREETS!!!

Now, where's my bailout money?...

Bartanist's picture

The "navel of the world" is an odd term that was used in antiquity to mean a portion of the Middle East. It translated exatly from the Sumerian. One wonders where AnGela heard this term and how it came for her to use it. Today, at least in America we might use the term "heart of the world", rather than navel.

So, maybe I missed something. Which country in Europe has a motivation to go to war with its neighbors and has the capability of raising a sufficient army?

ElvisDog's picture

None of them do. This isn't August 1914 with millions of young men ready to go and detailed battle plans waiting in the wings. The whole "there might be war in Europe" is just another in a long list of scare tactics so TPTB get their way.

qussl3's picture

Her neighbours have nukes, she doesnt.

DaBernank's picture

Not that europeans would nuke the only population willing to actually work but Germany could be nuclear capable inside of 6 months.

qussl3's picture

True, but it is still a big stick the french can swing if necessary.

That something like this is even part of any sane discussion is doubly disturbing.

PY-129-20's picture

There are around 10-20 (Süddeutsche Zeitung says 2005: around 150 nukes; but as far as I know Ramstein has no nukes anymore.) in Germany. But they are owned by the US military (of course). Cold war relict. Just saying...

Germans don't like nukes or anything radioactive. You know, environmental issues - nobody wants to see a glowing Bratwurst or a glowing Bavarian (Yikes!). ;)

DaBernank's picture

There is a strong undercurrent of nationalism in everything here. The EU projekt could have worked as long as everything was perfect but as soon as "Ludwig" is called upon to genuinely sacrifice for the good of "Francois" or "Demetrios" or vice-versa, the thing was bound to start falling apart. Look at Finland, a brand-new strong nationalist party came from nowhere and is now a major force in parliament there, this will happen everywhere in Europe at the next election cycle. It will be an interesting next few years.

Gavrikon's picture

Ludwig MIGHT be willing to sacrifice for Demetrios if Demetrios is also sacrificing.

Al Gorerhythm's picture

There's nothing sane about these psychopaths. They will have covered every base, allowing for their history and who pulls the strings.

Hobbleknee's picture

Seems like you're all forgetting the US has a bigger military in Europe than Europe does.  Europe, especially Germany, can't do anything without Obama's permission.

 

ALL YOUR BASE!

Calmyourself's picture

Ha, six months..  Dirty bombs deliverable in 6 hours..  Full blown nuke packages in 60 hours.  Germans are pacifist fools but not technological fools.

Instant Wealth's picture

I think, three days would be closer to reality.

Bloodgroove's picture

What could possibly go wrong?

Gene Parmesan's picture

These people are out of their minds if they think that this is the path to 50 peaceful years. They'll see soon enough.

j0nx's picture

The Brits are the only Euro country that even remotely still has the stomach for war in the trenches. Can you imagine the rest of pussified Europe running around the fields with rifles and rolling in the mud? Puhleeze. What spine those guys had was evaporated away with western materialism. The muslims, the chinese and the russians are the only ones who have the stomach for down and dirty warfare these days. Americans don't really have the stomach for it anymore either after 10 years of straight war but we can and will still hand out some ass kickings when/if they become necessary. The europeans countries? Not so much. They've been relying on America to be their police daddy for the past 50 years. We'll see what happens when big daddy tells them to stand up to the bully on their own for a change. You know it and I know it so don't even bother arguing with me about it.

english serf's picture

J0NX is right, the germans would only fight if there was a direct threat to their borders. Unlike us brits who will cheerfully bomb countries for a laugh, and when it comes to boots on the ground, just send a scottish regiment, give em a bottle of scotch each and tell em its a friday night and watch em go!

Gene Parmesan's picture

My point is that you don't need formal geneva convention-compliant warfare to derail the hope for "another 50 years" of peace in Europe. Violent uprisings were big in 2011 and are likely to continue and grow in the coming months and years. The insane fiscal policies being espoused aren't going to do a damn thing to avoid or mitigate that.

And the reality of the situation is that the individual citizens usually don't get a say in whether or not their country puts on their uniforms and marches off to fight. Boogeymen are created or magnified, nationalistic pride is tapped, and boys and men are enlisted to go off and fight the boys and men on the other side who have been fed a similar line.

Hobbleknee's picture

For real.  All the Euros I know practilly wet themselves if you even talk about guns.

Calmyourself's picture

Some Americans hove no stomach for total war.  You need to exit a city to figure out the real taste for war.

Bring the Gold's picture

What a stupidly Anglo-centric point of view. Just because the French and Germans haven't been overtly imperial for any number of years doesn't mean that 5 to 10% of their male population wouldn't IMMEDIATELY be willing to crack heads open. They still have testosterone coursing through their veins. I promise the germans would be militarily dominant within 6 months. Look at how fat and lazy the average American or Brit is, now compare that to their special forces guys. By comparison the German population is in vastly better shape and in Germany especially there is plenty of anger simmering RIGHT below the surface. I hardly think there is any chance of a real war happening, but under duress I promise that the absolute HEART of global warfare for 500 years (Europe) would pick that back up like riding a bi-cycle. You guys are just Anglo-centric morons.

Bring the Gold's picture

LOL, at the anglo-centric historical revisionist tard who gave me a thumbs down but didn't reply because they have no fact based retort.

HD's picture

Yea like the Germans would ever start a war...

Ethics Gradient's picture

Yea like the Germans would ever win a war...

DaBernank's picture

They won the economic war of the last 20 years, here they are, reunified and the manufacturing powerhouse of quality goods for the world.

Al Gorerhythm's picture

The only quality goods for the world....... considering that the world class manufacturing industries have been gifted to that Most-Favored-Nationed, China.

Ethics Gradient's picture

Sorry, but that's garbage. There are plenty of quality manufacturers around the world. The issue most have is the consumers are more comfortable throwing pennies at disposable extruded plastic goods from China (as an example) than they are on spending more on a milled alloy equivalent from America, France, Germany, the UK or even Argentina.

BarryG's picture

Germany just got the big juicy contracts. China just makes the throw-away crap.

Of course, German quality is a sales pitch. Nothing more. A pitch some people have bought as reality. Ever owned a Merc built after 1996?? Shit. Totally fall apart. Bad design, poor quality plastics, V6 and V8 engines that fail consistently after 30k...

They get their big defence and transport contracts (Siemens etc) from Bribery and corruption. Not because they are better. That is what they want the world to believe. Uber Alles.

molecool's picture

You are a racist German hating bastard. Go fick Dich!

Rynak's picture

Considering, that his recent post track record indeed consists ONLY of germany bashing, i agree.

Ethics Gradient's picture

By virtue of lumping themselves into a monetary union with a load of basket cases.

When your goods are 30% cheaper than they should be you can add some quality, be structurally inefficient and still make money.

Why do you think Frau Angel is getting jumpy?

They do have another advantage, I admit; they're born factory workers. They love structure and rules. Repetition is also fine.

Source? More than sufficient personal experience.

moonstears's picture

DaBernank...And now these spoils of productivity must be distributed to save other failing Euroblock nations? Think from their point of view(the people, not the puppets).

PY-129-20's picture

Well, we lost and won in the past. Example: 1871 against France (and lost as HRR against Napoleon-France; does it matter? I mean, it's not like a soccer match.). But it might not be a good idea to fight against the whole world. Maybe we should focus on...oh wait.

Actually, you're right. We've become pacifist. Might have something to do with the country being in ruins, and millions of dead people, and the unforgivable crimes some (many) of our men commited. We thought maybe, just maybe it is a good idea to focus just on our economy. Well...that worked - did it?

Rynak's picture

Well, it would have "worked" and have sounded impressive:

- If germany wouldn't be the one paying for its own sales

- If those fancy sales would benefit the population

 

Germany's economic power? Haha, all gov- and workforce-sponsored....

"In soviet germany, taxpayer and employee pays for work."

Bring the Gold's picture

Germans won plenty of wars, I love the complete divorce from historical accuracy Anglo-centric idiots have. Just because English speakers have "won" the past two great conflicts doesn't somehow negate CENTURIES of German and even French dominance in the field of combat.

Those great wars were won as much due to technology, resources and allies as much as for any other reason. Really the brits naval dominance in the 1600-1700's was what set the stage for WW I and WW II by dominating colonialization. If Germany had an American resources/industrial base equivalent as an ally they would have won.

Fuck, if they hadn't pissed off/threatened Stalin (or the bankers behind those two conflicts) they might very well have won. WW II was lost by Germany on the Eastern Front no matter how many times some English speaker puffs out their chest and declares otherwise.

molecool's picture

Yeah, like the Americans would ever start a war,,,

Dick Darlington's picture

Auntie Angela is printing new D-marks behind the scenes and giving clear hints of Germany's withdrawal from the failed union even if it means a major military conflict.

GeneMarchbanks's picture

I hope you're right because I think Guilt just won out. She thinks she's going to establish 50 years of peace with this, which is so batshit I have no speech. Speechless...

spanish inquisition's picture

I will go full tin hat (Edit: full tin hat = FTH, hehe). The real money men told her, "Do whatever you have to to save the Euro, or a war will start in Europe that we can cover our losses".

Historically speaking, war does nothing for the economies involved. The main benefactor is the group that lends money to both sides.

ElvisDog's picture

Just think that statement through and its goofy. You need an army and air force to fight a land war. How many active duty soldiers does any Euro country have any more? In Libya, the NATO planes were running out of ammo after only a few days. This supposed new Euro war would be the shortest, most comically absurd war in history. If they were really serious about it, there would be a long period of rearmanent, remilitarization like you saw in the 1930's.

Bring the Gold's picture

Maybe the Money Masters told Germany behind the scenes that the US and UK would start a war in Europe if they didn't do what they were told. Suddenly mr. tinfoil and the whole money masters thing, given their historical base(s), makes a lot more sense...don't it.

spanish inquisition's picture

Good point. Then where? Because if the Euro fails, war will be used to inflate banker balance sheets and they are not hard to start. Any EU country that prints their own money will be labeled the "rogue" state. Otherwise they will need to get more creative.