Obama Asserts Executive Privilege Over Fast And Furious Fiasco

Tyler Durden's picture

If there was any confusion whether Obama is in fact Bush, or maybe even Nixon, this has now been squashed. From Fox:

President Obama has granted an 11th-hour request by Attorney General Eric Holder to exert executive privilege over Fast and Furious documents, a last-minute maneuver that appears unlikely to head off a contempt vote against Holder by Republicans in the House. The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee is expected to forge ahead with its meeting on the contempt resolution anyway.

Holder, whose guilt is implicitly proven by this action, is now likely absolved of everything as the TOTUS has effectively onboarded all of his "balance sheet risk." And why not. The Fed does it for everyone else every day.

As a reminder, from the WSJ:

A showdown Wednesday in the House between Attorney General Eric Holder and Rep. Darrell Issa comes down to this: Who will blink first in a dispute over Justice Department documents Mr. Issa is demanding related to the botched Fast and Furious gun-trafficking probe?


California Republican Mr. Issa is chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, and he has called a 10 a.m. meeting of his panel to vote on a resolution to sanction Mr. Holder with contempt of Congress. The two men held a meeting Tuesday that lasted only 20 minutes. And from their accounts, it has become a game of chicken, with each side insisting the other act first to resolve the standoff.


Mr. Holder said Mr. Issa rejected his offer to provide documents because the lawmaker wouldn't agree that they would fulfill the subpoena, effectively ending the contempt threat. Mr. Issa said the attorney general didn't come prepared to provide documents and that the contempt threat can't be removed until the documents are produced.


At issue are Justice Department documents that Mr. Issa and Sen. Charles Grassley (R., Iowa) have sought and that the department resisted turning over in the congressional investigation into Fast and Furious. The department said the documents reflected internal deliberation or were related to continuing criminal investigations and therefore weren't subject to congressional subpoena.


If a majority of the committee votes for contempt Wednesday, the matter then could be taken up by the full House. If the House votes in favor, then a contempt citation could be referred to the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, an appointee of President Barack Obama who is in Mr. Holder's chain of command. And then things become legally more uncertain. It isn't clear if Congress can compel an executive-branch official to prosecute the attorney general. In the Bush administration, the House voted to hold White House officials in contempt in a similar documents dispute and the Bush-appointed attorney general ordered the U.S. attorney to disregard it. The matter was eventually settled with the production of documents before a civil-court battle ran its course.


The main issue in Fast and Furious remains the contention by Messrs. Issa and Grassley that the Justice Department is improperly withholding documents. The department has turned over thousands of documents—about 7,000 or 8,000, depending on which side is counting—and says it is being forthcoming. By comparison, the inspector general has had access to about 80,000 documents, including those the department has declined to share with lawmakers.




The matter has become a political fight, with little real impact on Mr. Holder, who is expected to serve out his tenure through the end of the current administration in January. Democrats accuse Republicans of using the contempt measure as a political tool against Mr. Holder and the president. Democrats did some of the same against President George W. Bush's attorney general, Alberto Gonzales, who resigned under pressure in a controversy over the firings of U.S. attorneys.

And now back to your regularly scheduled farce of a democratic republic.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
knightowl77's picture

mmmmmmmmmm How many guns actually walked under "Wide Receiver"?


"Fast & Furious" sent guns across the border without notification to the mexican authorities and actually resulted in 2 deaths here and hundreds of deaths in Mexico.

In this operation some 2000 guns went across the border without being tracked, some 600 are still missing...How you or Eric Holder can compare the 2 operations is beyond belief.....Absurdity

my puppy for prez's picture

Don't you understand that our govt. IS a criminal mafia?  That they have been funding black ops forever by drug and weapon deals?  Why are the Mexican cartels still in business while flanked by the "best military and intelligence in the world"?

Why?  Because the cartels work hand-in-hand with the alphabet agencies, who are their ultimate bosses!

It doesn't matter WHICH party is in office....this is the way the global cartel works.

Marginal Call's picture

So is it guns that kill people, or people that kill people?  


And 600 missing guns?  Who gives a fuck.  The USA is the largest arms dealer and drug pusher on the planet.  600 is a few thousand short of a gun show. 

prodigious_idea's picture

Exactly.  This is just a case of an irresistable force meeting an immovable object.  Typical political theater that allows Congress to avoid the important issues.

knightowl77's picture

the point was/is that the two operations are different...One tracked guns with the Mexican gov't's knowledge...the other sent guns across the border w/o the mexican Gov't's knowledge and people died as a result....

Fast & Furious was designed from the beginning to justify the clamping down on legitimate gun sales in the USA...A black flag op to scale back my and your 2nd Amend rights...


HUGE Difference....


As to your moral equivalence BS, STFU

Marginal Call's picture

Hey buddy, whenever gun control legislation comes up the whole NRA crowd comes around and says guns are just a tool.  Guns don't kill people, remember.  But the ATF loses track of some guns in a sting and now they are murderers.


You guys are making the same argument as the gun control lobby.  That it's the provider of the weapon and not the user who is responsible.  You just hate guy so much you want to hang him for whatever you think can stick. 

FeralSerf's picture

The ATF knew this was against the law in Mexico.  When the shoe was on the other foot and Pancho Villa was dealing in weapons and had a disagreement with his supplier that turned violent in Columbus, NM the U.S. Army invaded Mexico.  Americans considered it an act of war then.

Marginal Call's picture

We're America.  The only sovierngty we respect is our own.  You think we give a fuck about Mexico?  We're wrecking it with our drug war so the Cocaine Importing Agency can run the biggest racket in history.


You guys are trying to hand out speeding tickets at Daytona. 

my puppy for prez's picture

Actually, Wiki has a definite CIA/MOSSAD front company sort of thing goin' on....

And those folks have only ONE allegiance:  Their globalist criminal dons!

Burr's 2nd Shot's picture

Seems to be an interesting distinction there, since the Wide Receiver documents aren't receiving the executive privilege.  Why only F&F if it is the same thing and no big deal?

DOT's picture

Some files are marked with red, some blue.

The blue files will be protected the red files will be in the Washington Post.

dwdollar's picture

And the idiots will rally around their respective teams. God forbid they admit the same thing happened under two "different" puppets. That would break their false reality.

fxrxexexdxoxmx's picture

How long did it take for another Obama dead head to blame Bush.

If Barracky was POTUS 50 years terms he would still be blaming Bush.

dwdollar's picture


You completely missed the fucking point by a mile.

my puppy for prez's picture

Agreed.  What's with all the dialectical diatribes here today?  

I think desperation short circuits critical thinking, no?

Abiotic Oil's picture

ATF has been been doing everything they can to go after guns (Tax stamps for Class III weapons justified by the interstate commerce clause... really?) since they really lost the "A" in their name after prohibition ended.

Agencies must prosecute and produce "results" in order to grow their budgets.  If there isn't enough actual criminal activity then rig some up.

Calmyourself's picture

1st your an idiot..  "Wide Receiver" the Bush era program actually tracked guns fucktard...  Fast & Furious never TRACKED THE GUNS YOU ASS..  ATF AGENTS RATTED OUT THEIR OWN BOSSES, why because Fast & Furious never tracked guns the agents in fact were prohibited from following the straw buyers as they left the gun stores where they were purchasing dozens of AK's at a time..  You keep pretending you can discern facts from fiction it is obviously what you think your good at..

DosZap's picture

An EO for something HE knew nothing about..............no knowledge.

Its called Covering Both Our Asses.

bigdumbnugly's picture

and does so fastly and furiously.  but not surprisingly.

battle axe's picture

Can you say Pardon?

Firing Pin's picture

Wow. Eric Holder not upholding the law...or the Constitution. I'm "shocked." 

lesterbegood's picture

Perhaps he is confused as to which "Constitution" to uphold? (sarc).

There are 2 American constitutions: The Constitution for the united States c.1787; and the corporate construct CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES created by a 3 man commission appointed by corporate President U.B. Grant in 1868, and allegedly ratified in 1871 (The Organic Act).


Randall Cabot's picture

"Obama, Hitler, And Exploding The Biggest Lie In History



What a crock of shit article that is-it had all the usual red herrings (like karl marx was an anti-semite, LOL) to cover for the jew supremacists whose mantra (whether they pose as communists, capitalists, liberals, conservatives, religionists or whatever) is: IS IT GOOD FOR THE JEWS?

John Law Lives's picture

Yes, there is a choice to be made in November.  This corksoaker HAS to go.

semperfi's picture

the choice is this:  A) be shot in the face  B) be shot in the nuts

John Law Lives's picture

Choosing not to vote is an option if that is what you elect to do.  As for me, I find it absurd that anyone thinks this SOB deserves another term in office.  There is no way Romney would be as thoroughly bad as this imposter.

hedgeless_horseman's picture



"Yes, there is a choice to be made in November."




Change, vers 2.0

pupton's picture

Hmmm...It looks like this guy could possibly be related to Dubya.

John Law Lives's picture

Nobody said Romney was worth a damn, but he will be the GOP nominee.  Therefore, when November rolls around, registered voters can CHOOSE to vote for a candidate on the ballot, they can CHOOSE to vote for a write-in candidate, or they can CHOOSE not vote at all.  Therefore, every registered voter will make a CHOICE.  I consider any CHOICE that most likely leads to another term in office for Obumble to be a bad CHOICE.

Hey, I supported Ron Paul and I voted for Ron Paul in the Texas GOP Primary.  Ron Paul is not going to be the GOP nominee.  He is most likely not going to run as a Libertarian Party candidate.  He is not going to win as a write-in candidate.  Rand endorsed the presumptive GOP nominee.  Ron and Rand will both make their choices in November.  So will I.  You may choose for yourself.

hedgeless_horseman's picture



"There is no way Romney would be as thoroughly bad as this imposter."


Hope, vers 2.0

John Law Lives's picture

Rand Paul agrees with me.  Will you commit seppuku if Ron Paul also votes for Romney?

hedgeless_horseman's picture



The presidential elections are way out of any reasonable person's concern, at this point. 


I am, however, trying to educate my County Sherrif and Constable as to what the fuck is really going on in this country.  I invite you, fellow Texan, to take your's out for lunch and do the same.

You can start by showing him or her the above video, then read and discuss this letter about The Inflation Tax.

Peace, pardner.

John Law Lives's picture

"I invite you, fellow Texan, to take your's out for lunch and do the same." - h_h

That is a fine idea, but I seriously doubt Sheriff Lupe Valdez is willing to listen to reason from any of us regulars on the ZH forum.  I still can't believe she was elected for the job...

Peace, out.

hedgeless_horseman's picture



Start with your constable, for whom a $100 campaign contribution is a big deal.

my puppy for prez's picture

Considering your true wisdom, it is an honor and a pleasure to call you a fellow Texan.  You make the state just a little better just by being here.  I like your approach, and non-delusional philosophy!

John Law Lives's picture

That is a choice.  His political principles are superior (imo) to Romney's and Obumble's.

Lucky Guesst's picture

That is who I am choosing. Gary Johnson would do less harm to me personaly than Obama has or Romney would. His views best match what I believe.

GARY JOHNSON 2012!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

icanhasbailout's picture

If you take a close look at Gary Johnson you see his differences with Obamney are less a matter of kind than a matter of degree. His key difference with them is "cost-effectiveness", not principles.

John Law Lives's picture

Good luck finding a man/woman of principles that can get elected to be POTUS.  The chips are stacked heavily against them.

icanhasbailout's picture

Events will force a choice between a real reformer and a dictator, as real world systems break down under the pressure of exponential growth demands upon them. It just might be worth your time to help steer things down the right path, no matter how long the odds are.

GMadScientist's picture

"Ron and Rand will both make their choices in November.  So will I."

Whatever helps you sleep a little longer, I guess.

CURWAR2012's picture

That picture is the scariest shit out there!

hedgehog9999's picture

Awesome picture , you guys are masters of Electronic DNA!!!!

Not too hard as all these fuckers have similar DNA strands.