This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Obama Budget: 99 Senators Against, 0 For

Tyler Durden's picture





 

Two months ago, Congress voted down the "Obama budget" by a vote of 414-0. Today, the Senate chimed in. The result was just as definitive. Final outcome, between the Congress and the Senate, a grand total of zero votes were cast for the Obama budget... and a mere 513 against.

From Washington Times:

President Obama's budget suffered a second embarrassing defeat Wednesday, when senators voted 99-0 to reject it.

 

Coupled with the House's rejection in March, 414-0, that means Mr. Obama's budget has failed to win a single vote in support this year.

 

Republicans forced the vote by offering the president's plan on the Senate floor.

 

Democrats disputed that it was actually the president's plan, arguing that the slim amendment didn't actually match Mr. Obama's budget document, which ran thousands of pages. But Republicans said they used all of the president's numbers in the proposal, so it faithfully represented his plan.

 

Sen. Jeff Sessions, Alabama Republican, even challenged Democrats to point out any errors in the numbers and he would correct them — a challenge no Democrats took up.

 

"A stunning development for the president of the United States in his fourth year in office," Mr. Sessions said of the unanimous opposition.

At this point what is even the point of commenting on these increasingly more surreal developments. When one encounters news like these, what can one say but... "Banana republic". In the meantime, America is in the second, or third year, frankly who is even counting anymore, without any formal budget. But it sure has a very much informal spending program...

 


- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 05/16/2012 - 20:38 | Link to Comment Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

What budget?

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 20:45 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

What Senate?  What House?   This is all just pure theater.  The Red Team and Blue Team both share equal blame for bringing us to the abyss.  

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 20:51 | Link to Comment PivotalTrades
PivotalTrades's picture

Why do you deny that the philosphy that the government is the answer is the central plank of the Democrats.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 20:59 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

The Blue Team and the Red Team are both completely captured by the oligarchs.  There is no philosophy, just theater.  George Bush grew government more than the guy before him.  Clinton grew government more than the guy before him.  Bush Sr. grew government more than the guy before him.  Reagan grew government more than the guy before him.  Show me the difference in what they do, not what they say.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:22 | Link to Comment CrazyCooter
CrazyCooter's picture

... grew government more than the guy before him.

You can continue this trend until ... Eisenhower. I use this trivia often to slap Republican friends around who think the party is about small government.

Regards,

Cooter

DISCLOURE: Registered Republican ... a hard money fiscal conservative.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:28 | Link to Comment toady
toady's picture

Fiscal liberal, social conservative.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:57 | Link to Comment Gully Foyle
Gully Foyle's picture

toady

Screw social conservativism. I want a public parade of every freaky thing out there.

I crave entertainment.


Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:05 | Link to Comment nope-1004
nope-1004's picture

Definitive proof that Obama is a loser.  As was Bush and all the other bankster appointees.

This ship is going down.  Hopefully the "people" will regain this once free country, because the idiot politicos sure don't want to.

 

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 23:25 | Link to Comment Oh regional Indian
Oh regional Indian's picture

Looks like someone needs a little Unity in his Government.

And by the way, who IS Valerie Jarret? Why does she sound so familiar and creepy? Whazzup with her? I've read in places that she runs the show.

ori

world

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 03:51 | Link to Comment tenpanhandle
tenpanhandle's picture

obviously, You are missing that parade as you speak.  "...entertain us!!!" -  Nirvana.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:49 | Link to Comment Freddie
Freddie's picture

Eisenhower was good and even Reagan was not part of Skull & Bones so poppy tried to wack him and almost succeeded.   It was payback for this too:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OO2_49TycdE

Both parties suck but Barry and the Dems are even worse.  Name the Ron and Rand Paul of the Dem Party.  At least the GOP has 2 decent patriots.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:55 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

Kucinich and Sanders both stand up for Liberty.  

The parties do have differences, which is exactly why even people who see the fraud continue to hold their noses and vote for their Team.  You are a perfect example.  Think about it really hard.  The status quo will not change so long as they are both in charge.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:04 | Link to Comment divide_by_zero
divide_by_zero's picture

They stand for statism masquerading as liberty, nothing there.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:17 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

Some of us -- including the Founding Fathers of the United States -- believe you can have both a State and Liberty, and indeed that you need one to have the other.  

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 00:21 | Link to Comment CrockettAlmanac.com
CrockettAlmanac.com's picture

That's what Ayn Rand believed. Of course she was wrong about that.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:44 | Link to Comment TMT
TMT's picture

Sanders is a self proclaimed socialist. Socialism does not = liberty you fucking statist.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:01 | Link to Comment Gully Foyle
Gully Foyle's picture

Freddie

Many years ago C-SPAN had one of the Texas conspiracy guys on.

He claimed that Reagan wanted to investigate the Tri-Lateral commision, one of the big conspiracy groups of the time if not this specific one. That Reagan made public speeches to that effect.

Then at the Republican convention TPTB forced Poppy on Ronny to shut him up.

Thus the anger.

Remember that the Bushes were NEVER allowed in the Reagans quarters at the white house.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:13 | Link to Comment Freddie
Freddie's picture

+1

Reagan did not trust Poppy.   If you watch video and look at pictures of 1976 Convention - Reagan lost the floor fight to Ford. Reagan gave an incredible speech - the crowd was having buyers remorse from it too.  Reagan turned down Ford's offer to be VP.  On stage you will see Ford and his family applauding Reagan with tri-Lateral's brother Nelson Rockefeller standing right there.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trilateral_Commission

I don't think Reagan was an oligarch stooge because they tried to get rid of him.  Everyone after him - is a stooge.

VP's wacking Presidents was nothing new. Just ask LBJ.  Who got insanely rich(er) off Vietnam?  If you search around YouTube you will find a video by a smart older guy who did metal spectometry or something.  He did detailed analysis and found the JFK kill shot came from a sewer grate. He had it down to the actual spot.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:20 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

You can believe what you want about Reagan, but he started the deficit machine and massively grew government during his eight years.  He did give a good speech, though. 

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:37 | Link to Comment Bring the Gold
Bring the Gold's picture

He was more or less a zombie after the assassination attempt. Poppy had 12 years.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:59 | Link to Comment Ookspay
Ookspay's picture

Obviously, you are under 40, age or IQ, you pick!

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 00:27 | Link to Comment CrockettAlmanac.com
CrockettAlmanac.com's picture

"Since he has no program and no ideology to offer, his likeliest motive for entering the Presidential race is power lust.''-- Ayn Rand on the candidacy of Ronald Reagan

 

http://www.nytimes.com/1982/03/07/obituaries/07randobit.html

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 07:40 | Link to Comment kralizec
kralizec's picture

Reagan = Deficits, nice, right out of the MFM phrasebook word for word! 

If you bothered to check the facts, or better yet lived through them as I did you would know that it was the DemonRats in Congress that "promised" cuts that never came so Reagan could have his tax cuts and military spending.  But far be it from me to suggest DemonRats are lying, decietful fucks...sometimes people have to experience that more personally to realize it is true.  And the only "massive" increase Reagan was part of was repairing our military that was run down to shit by Carter, I know, I was there.  I guess that exposes your pro-Code Pink streak.

Good luck on your journey.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:58 | Link to Comment Ookspay
Ookspay's picture

1) George Washington

2) Ronald Wilson Reagan

3) Thomas Jefferson

 

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 23:09 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

The actor certainly convinced you, didn't he.

Let me just ask you... How much did he grow the deficit?  Any idea?

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 23:26 | Link to Comment Ookspay
Ookspay's picture

I have no time to disabuse or abuse you... Ironically, you're probably a Krugman Keynesian who would normally say defecits don't matter. Got Koolaid?

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 23:53 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

Irony.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 23:47 | Link to Comment Acorn10012
Acorn10012's picture

Is it the Congress that spends money?

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 23:54 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

And the President who signs the budget, yes?

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 07:29 | Link to Comment odatruf
odatruf's picture

No.  The President does not sign the budget. 

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 03:31 | Link to Comment Kobe Beef
Kobe Beef's picture

JFK kill shot = William Greer

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 23:10 | Link to Comment oldman
oldman's picture

@Gully Gully,

Reagan was an actor. He's dead. I don't even know what his true name was-----not many do----let him rest in peace is all I can say

thanks    om

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 23:34 | Link to Comment Ookspay
Ookspay's picture

FYI Oldman, His REAL name was Ronald Wilson Reagan. He was a great president and a good man, and you are just old and ignorant.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 23:55 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

And you are _______ and ignorant.

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 01:40 | Link to Comment Oh regional Indian
Oh regional Indian's picture

Perhaps ookspay got some trickle-down love from Raygun!

ori

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 21:42 | Link to Comment Ookspay
Ookspay's picture

Just because you may need some balance in your Reagan diet...

In the late 70's and early eighties the Soviet Union was going broke, they were expanding all over the globe in an effort to try to fund and save their failing system. Reagan almost singlehandedly stopped them, thus bankrupting and destroying them without ever firing a shot, perhaps saving the entire globe, but for sure liberating tens of millions of people.

Raygun indeed!

Long Live the Great Ronald Reagan! You wacko liberal revisionists will not spout your crap uncecked by the Spook!

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 22:47 | Link to Comment Acorn10012
Acorn10012's picture

His real name was Zool...better known as the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.

Living through the 70's, I thought he helped turn America around.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:35 | Link to Comment Bring the Gold
Bring the Gold's picture

JFK was a Dem and not S&B and they shot him too, didn't mess around either. Same with his brother RFK. So yeah, you're either part of the team or you get shot. As to your Ron Paul statement I agree. I actually agreed with everything you said, just felt that JFK and RFK deserved mention as well.

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 03:32 | Link to Comment OpenThePodBayDoorHAL
OpenThePodBayDoorHAL's picture

Just read a great bio of Ike by Michael Korda. I'm a (former) Dem and really appreciated the man. A little humility and reasonableness and lack of hubris would help these fuckers today. Would also help if pols were required to study some history.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:22 | Link to Comment KennyG09
KennyG09's picture

KennyG09 reflection on 1 year of Zerohedge membership and toast:

- Fight club has one rule: Do not speak about fight club. I ask fellow ZH'ers; trolls and diehards alike: Why should fight club have rules if our current power wielders don't follow any?

- I have seen countless arguments for gold standards, no governments, ron paul, destruction of "crazy doomer libertarian psycho assclowns" - but I hardly ever see arguments for the destruction of fractional reserve banking. Why is this so? The Fed is only an istitution set up for governments to profit from fractional reserve banking and to keep said system in place [which private banks started and gov's got jealous of - Florence, Bank of Amsterdam, etc, etc.]. Gold standards, new governments, and ending the Fed won't change that. Outlaw fractional reserve banking; period.

Other observations:

- Where's Robo?

- I can't eat gold but I can eat my dividend paying stocks and Fried Rat Notes

- Cubicle Monkeys need loving too.

- US citizenism

- Civis Mundi

Take care you ZH'ers - I raise my Jack n' Coke to great fights in the future.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:01 | Link to Comment Bay of Pigs
Bay of Pigs's picture

Not sure who and what you've been reading on ZH but End the FED and fractional reserve lending has been a steady mantra here for a long time now. 

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:08 | Link to Comment KennyG09
KennyG09's picture

I've seen plenty of end the Fed...which is great n' all but wouldn't change the perpetual credit expansion machine of fractional reserve banking.  It must just be my experience not seeing much talk about fractional reserve banking. Cheers :)

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 23:06 | Link to Comment smb12321
smb12321's picture

Kenny, the quality and quantity of the comments are in indirect proportion to the technical nature of the article.  THings like obesity, Israel, gold going to $20,000 or  wacko conspiracies gets TONS of imprecise gramatically incorrect replies.   Technical articles get 1/3 the comments and many are of the order, "Yeah, bitchez!"

Fractional banking is also one of my pet peeves as is multiple taxation. The State can get involved in every detail of human existence due to the amounts raised by  multiple taxation and massive borrowing. If it had to exist on single taxation only (and no borrowing) we would truly have a limited government.

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 01:42 | Link to Comment Oh regional Indian
Oh regional Indian's picture

smb, this is clearly not a pure finance site.

And these are clarly NOT financial times. 

Perhaps you need the Technical Take?

ori

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:25 | Link to Comment toady
toady's picture

Alternative title:

Obama Haters Unite!

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 23:49 | Link to Comment Acorn10012
Acorn10012's picture

One toke

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 23:57 | Link to Comment palmereldritch
palmereldritch's picture

  Obviously you're not a golfer.

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 04:00 | Link to Comment tenpanhandle
tenpanhandle's picture

one stroke

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 07:21 | Link to Comment palmereldritch
palmereldritch's picture

  Mark it Zero!

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 09:04 | Link to Comment GeezerGeek
GeezerGeek's picture

His attitude toward the Constitution is similar: ignore it.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:30 | Link to Comment jeff montanye
jeff montanye's picture

you are so right about the mutual corruption.

however the article above uses the banana republic tag on the united states.  while some parts seem apt, rule by plutocracy, highly stratified class structure, strong military establishment with limited civil rights, the typical b.r. was ruled by a strongman who controlled the largely ceremonial legislature.  not so much here.

thanks to the inquiry i found out that o. henry hid out in honduras for some time avoiding prosecution for bank embezzlement.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana_republic

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:38 | Link to Comment FrankThinkTank
FrankThinkTank's picture

@LetThemEatRand

You are a charade, nothing more.  

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:41 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

Well reasoned response, asshole.  

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 02:02 | Link to Comment ffart
ffart's picture

I read the ancient Greeks basically went down the same way. Someone figured out they could just give the treasury away to the public and get instant power in return. I guess the only thing history teaches is that noone ever learns from history.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:25 | Link to Comment TheFourthStooge-ing
TheFourthStooge-ing's picture

PivotalTrades asked (based on the words used, not the terminal punctuation):

Why do you deny that the philosphy that the government is the answer is the central plank of the Democrats.

Why do you maintain the belief that there is any difference between the "two parties" when it comes to the thirst for more power? The ostensible differences between the Democrats and Republicans (both wholly owned subsidiaries of Paraciticorp Sachs Chase) are nothing more than well choreographed vignettes staged for public consumption.

 

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 23:06 | Link to Comment Binko
Binko's picture

Because it's also the central plank of the red team. The only difference is that they lie about it. 

Red team wants just as big of a central government as blue team, they just want it to be composed of different parts. 

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 23:11 | Link to Comment candyman
candyman's picture

Are you fucking stupid. What do you expect from a black president... a balanced budget? He lives just like the check book of a crack whore.  Spend and dont worry about your debts. Its unforgivitable that a president would NEVER offer a BUDGET! What a fucking n____r disgrace.

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 04:04 | Link to Comment tenpanhandle
tenpanhandle's picture

come on you can say it "he's a near disgrace.  You , however are a complete disgrace.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:01 | Link to Comment nmewn
nmewn's picture

His combined budget requests over the last few cycles are 610-0. I emphasize requests because that's all he can legitimately do...request to spend.

Even the brain dead Sen. Sanders has to abstain, that should tell you something.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:07 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

You do know that Sanders has consistently voted against the Patriot Act in its various forms.  Just like I love Ron Paul for his dedication to freedom, you may want to give Sanders a little love for standing up against the machine.  He's one of the few.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:13 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

P.S.  If guys like you and me could ever band together, we may be able to have actual debates about real differences in real candidates.  I'll vote for Ron Paul if you vote for Bernie Sanders or his equivalent.  You may disagree with his view of markets, but he supports small government and individual freedom where it counts most.   Heck, I'll vote for Paul anyway.  But think about it.  

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:20 | Link to Comment Joe The Plumber
Joe The Plumber's picture

Sanders is a freaking socialist, but he did team up with ron paul for a real fed audit, not the make believe audit that finally ocurred

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:36 | Link to Comment TheFourthStooge-ing
TheFourthStooge-ing's picture

Joe The Plumber said:

Sanders is a freaking socialist, but he did team up with ron paul for a real fed audit, not the make believe audit that finally ocurred

It is interesting that Sanders, a self-labeled "Socialist", when judged only by actions taken in the Senate, isn't nearly as "socialist" as most of his Senate peers (both Democrat and Republican).

If there's one thing that big government loves, it's bigger government.

 

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 02:34 | Link to Comment John_Coltrane
John_Coltrane's picture

Indeed, I think we can give Sanders credit for opposition to the TSA, support of a real FED audit, and opposition to the "patriot act".  However, unlike, Paul and his son Rand, as a socialist he believes in the welfare state, which ironically requires a FED to fund deficit spending via debt and money creation since the taxes required to support it would never be allowed by voters.  Thus, Sanders is either a hypocrite or hopelessly naive regarding government and its role  (which is only national defense and enforcing the rule of law).  You can't support the FED and believe in sound money at the same time-a central Paul position.  Thus, a comparison of RP and Sanders is absurd and an obvious strawman.  RP, his son Rand and many others like Sen Pat Toomey are the only true patriots representing the libertarian viewpoint in congress.  A powerful central government and freedom for the individual are mutually exclusive despite the annoying trolling and obvious statism shown in all the comments of LTER.  And I gave this bozo the URL for the Huffington post months ago, but he keeps annoying us here.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:29 | Link to Comment Cortez the Killer
Cortez the Killer's picture

the same rope we'd use to hang sanders would be used on you next marxist agitator

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:48 | Link to Comment Bring the Gold
Bring the Gold's picture

IIRC, you regularly post in the voice of hard right fascist. Not surprising you want to hang "Marxist Agitators" Hitler wanted the same. You can vote them out, you can use the law where applicable, but wanting to hang fellow citizens for civic discussions not matter how putrid is essentially saying you want to do away with the 1st amendment and instead have brown shirts unilateraly deciding on extra-judicial killings. Not my version of America by a long shot.

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 09:30 | Link to Comment GeezerGeek
GeezerGeek's picture

I fail to see how you equate National Socialism with the 'hard right' end of the political spectrum. Hitler and fascism were attributed to the right wing only because communist sympathizers in the MSM back in the 30s didn't want Hitler (national socialism) and Stalin (international socialism) linked in any way. Hitler was bad. Stalin was to be admired.

To me, socialism in any form is left-wing, not right-wing. Erroneously putting different versions of socialism at opposite ends of the political spectrum leaves no place for libertarian/small government types.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:53 | Link to Comment nmewn
nmewn's picture

I did want to address this...

"I'll vote for Ron Paul if you vote for Bernie Sanders or his equivalent."

For far too long honest men have done this, only to be stabbed in the back. The first order of business is getting a complete incompetent, who shields this major flaw with arrogance, out of the WH and as far away from "button pushing" as possible.

After that...we'll talk.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:58 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

Won't happen so long as guys like you continue to refuse to think outside your ideologue box.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:11 | Link to Comment nmewn
nmewn's picture

Alright...explain your vision of wealth distribution.

Who is entitled to the lions share of earnings...the state or the earner?

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:35 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

The earner.

P.S., my vision of society requires the state to take in far less than it takes in today.  Contrary to what ideologues like you believe, much of current taxation goes to the MIC, the prison industrial complex, the oligarchs, feeding the Fed and its member banks and bondholders, and so forth.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:56 | Link to Comment nmewn
nmewn's picture

"The earner."

+1

Now we're getting somewhere...I'll return to this in the morning with a response which you will never answer...just as before.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 23:12 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

Don't bother.  You have no idea what you believe in.  I no longer care what you think you believe in.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:20 | Link to Comment Prometheus418
Prometheus418's picture

I've read hundreds of posts from you both, and I can definitively say that you're the ideologue here, LTER.  Your comment is projection, and little else.

Not that it'll matter to you, just stepping in as ref.  I don't post as much as I used to, but I still read almost all the articles and comments.

For what it's worth, I only vote for human beings, not ideologies.  Sometimes that means crossing the ficticious party lines- for example, I support both Feingold and Walker in Wisconsin, and I doubt either would consent to buy the other a beer.  Don't agree 100% with either, but they are both actual people, and not hand puppets.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:26 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

If we need a ref, I think I'll pick someone else.  

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 04:10 | Link to Comment tenpanhandle
tenpanhandle's picture

ball three!, You're out!!!.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:20 | Link to Comment nmewn
nmewn's picture

Bernie Sanders is a self avowed socialist, therefore my committed enemy, no matter what issues we may agree on in the short term when it's convient for him to do so.

Fuck him and the unicorn he rode in on.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:22 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

Good for The Man that you feel so committed to ideas rather than practicalities.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:40 | Link to Comment nmewn
nmewn's picture

Don't give me The Man bullshit.

My idea is that once taxes are paid any monetary committment to the state ends...very practical in my estimation. Unlike Bernie whoring himself for stimulus dollars, we tossed out a govenor over that simple fact.

We did it for our children ;-)

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:42 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

As usual, you reveal yourself as nothing but an ideologue. 

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:02 | Link to Comment nmewn
nmewn's picture

What is ideological about accepting the fact taxes have to be paid, in order to fund government operations and once that obligation is made to government to be left the fuck alone?

Otherwise it is anarchy.

Your premise implies double/triple/quadruple taxation of the same dollar earned.

That is not charity...it is tyranny.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:06 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

I no longer understand what you are trying to say.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:18 | Link to Comment nmewn
nmewn's picture

I'm not surprised.

Charity is given freely, not greedily taken at the point of a gun.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:27 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

And yet neither charity nor private gun ownership would exist in the world you advocate.  

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:50 | Link to Comment Cabreado
Cabreado's picture

You guys playing cards?

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 09:32 | Link to Comment GeezerGeek
GeezerGeek's picture

LTER is clearly not playing with a full deck.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:36 | Link to Comment Global Hunter
Global Hunter's picture

Well if there's a rule to live by its to be pragmatic and place pragmatism above one's own ideology so on that note I have to side with you LTER. If all us non illumati keep fighting amongst ourselves on fundamental matters it will make it easier for the bankster elites to keep us down.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:42 | Link to Comment Joe The Plumber
Joe The Plumber's picture

Agreed. Give bernie a gun and once we rid ourselves of the corrupt political oligarcy we can duke it out among ourselves

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:54 | Link to Comment MaggieL
MaggieL's picture

Bernie's from Vermont, let him get his own gun. 

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:02 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

Vermont is one of the most free states in the Union.  Bernie has consistently supported the right to free gun ownership.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:07 | Link to Comment nmewn
nmewn's picture

Can they even own a flintlock in Vermont without registering it with the state?

Honest question...my impression of the NE is the state wants to know how many kitchen knives, baseball bats and zit cream one has.  

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:09 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

As usual, you are spewing words but have no idea what you are talking about.  "My impression of the NE..."  Really?

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:30 | Link to Comment nmewn
nmewn's picture

Did you want to speak to NE firearms laws or are you just spewing words?

Thought so ;-)

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:31 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

Just admit you were wrong, winker.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:27 | Link to Comment TheFourthStooge-ing
TheFourthStooge-ing's picture

nmewn asked:

Can they even own a flintlock in Vermont without registering it with the state?

Vermont does not issue concealed carry permits for firearms. This is not due to anti-firearm bias, but because Vermont sees no need to issue permits for such legal activity.

 

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:28 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

But nmewn's impression -- not having been there or read anything about it -- is....

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:40 | Link to Comment nmewn
nmewn's picture

Just looked it up and skiimed it as a matter of fact...a loaded rifle or shotgun can't be lawfully transported without permit on a state highway.

Why?

Are legislators unsure of the mechanics involved for any firearm (long or short) to discharge by magic?

Over to you "firearms law expert".

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 23:16 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

All that I can say is... you have no substance.

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 04:28 | Link to Comment tenpanhandle
tenpanhandle's picture

While the border guards are feds and therefore this little anecdote may  be inapplicable, I'll take my cue from half the comments above and post it anyway.  Once while crossing from canada into vermont ( the only time I ever did), I was denied entry because I had a shotgun in the car.  It didn't matter that it originated in California from whence I came also.  So maybe you conceal your gun in vermont so the state won't take it from you? 

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:45 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

Too bad so few see it.  

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:59 | Link to Comment Cortez the Killer
Cortez the Killer's picture

You sanctimoniuos cunt

Youd swing in a new republic

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:04 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

Did I hit a button, assfuck?

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:06 | Link to Comment Gully Foyle
Gully Foyle's picture

LetThemEatRand

http://vermontrepublic.org/the-myth-of-bernie-sanders

The Myth of Bernie Sanders

Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders has recently been elevated to near godlike status by the political Left in the United States.  Some of his fans have even suggested that he should challenge Barack Obama in the Democratic Presidential Primary.  The more often he is accused of being a socialist by his political enemies on the Right, the more convinced the Left becomes that he surely walks on water.

Although Sanders may have once been a socialist back in the 80s when he was Mayor of Burlington, today, a socialist he is not.  Rather he behaves more like a technofascist disguised as a liberal, who backs all of President Obama’s nasty little wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen.  Since he always “supports the troops,” Sanders never opposes any defense spending bill.  He stands behind all military contractors who bring much-needed jobs to Vermont.

Senator Sanders rarely misses a photo opportunity with Vermont National Guard troops when they are being deployed to Afghanistan or Iraq.  He’s always at the Burlington International Airport when they return.  If Sanders truly supported the Vermont troops, he would vote to end all of the wars posthaste.

Senator Patrick Leahy, Senator Bernie Sanders, and Congressman Peter Welch could hardly contain their enthusiasm over the news that Burlington International Airport had been named as a possible site to house the Air Force’s new F-35 fighter jet scheduled to replace the Vermont Air National Guard’s aging fleet of F-16s.  The new high-tech instruments of death will cost $115 million a pop in sharp contrast to the F-16s which cost a mere $20 million each.

From whom might these F-35s protect Vermont?  Possibly, Canada, separatist-minded Quebec, upstate New York, the New Hampshire Free State, or the Commonwealth of Massachusetts?  Why on earth would anyone want to invade Vermont?  Vermont has no military bases, no large cities, no important government installations, and no strategic resources unless you count an aging nuclear power plant.  What if Canada, China, Russia, North Korea, Iran, or even the U.S. Marines were to invade the Green Mountain state?  Just what would they do with it?  Would all of the black-and-white Holsteins be confiscated, or perhaps the entire sugar maple crop be burned?  Imagine trying to enslave freedom-loving Vermonters.  Good luck!

Vermont is too small, too rural, and too independent to be invaded by anyone.  It is a threat to no one.  Furthermore, Vermonters, not unlike the Swiss, tend to stick to their own knitting rather than intruding into the affairs of their neighbors.  Vermont has always been that way and probably always will be.

Major General Michael Dubie, head of the Vermont National Guard, has expressed the hope that the Vermont Guard might be morphed into a center for unmanned drone aircraft.  Sanders, not unlike President Obama, thinks drones are cool.

Sanders is the darling of the American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee and the right-wing Likud government of Israel.  He has done everything within his power to keep the myth of Islamic terrorism alive.  He never questions the U.S. government’s unconditional support of Israeli acts of genocide and ethnic cleansing against the Palestinians.  It is as though these are nonevents.

Last, but by no means least, is the U.S. government-owned Sandia National Laboratories.  For over two years Sanders and former University of Vermont President Daniel Fogel have been encouraging Sandia to open a satellite laboratory in Vermont.  Sandia, whose historical origins can be traced back to the Manhattan Project in World War II, designs, builds, and tests weapons of mass destruction.  The Vermont laboratory envisaged by Sanders would not be involved with nuclear weapons but rather would be engaged in projects related to energy efficiency, renewable energy, and electric grids.  Sandia, interestingly enough, is operated under contract by Lockheed Martin, the largest defense contractor in the world.  Lockheed Martin produces F-35s and drones.  General Dubie, who has close ties to Lockheed Martin, recently received an honorary doctorate from UVM.  No one at UVM seems to care whether or not the University gets in bed with a manufacturer of atomic bombs.

Bernie Sanders loves to rail against Corporate America, Wall Street, and the super-rich, but has nothing to show for it.  He’s done little to constrain their power and influence.  But everybody on the Left loves Bernie.

Thomas H. Naylor

September 12, 2011

Founder of the Second Vermont Republic and Professor Emeritus of Economics at Duke University; co-author of Affluenza, Downsizing the USA, and The Search for Meaningwww.vermontrepublic.org.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:09 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

Wow, the lady doth protest too much.

Ron Paul and Bernie Sanders get along pretty well for a reason, your cut-and-paste notwithstanding.

Seems like this discussion about Paul and Sanders has really rubbed some asshole status quo feathers the wrong way.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:23 | Link to Comment Prometheus418
Prometheus418's picture

You know, from time to time I hear people ranting about how they just can't find anyone suitable to date or marry.  There's always a laundry list of semi-plausible complaints, but in the end, it always comes back to this-

If the problems you experience follow you from situation to situation, it's time to consider that maybe your counter-parties are not the issue- maybe the issue is with you.

 

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:39 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

When all else fails, play the bully.  Comes natural, eh?

If you disagree with anything substantive I've said, it would be impossible from your posts to know anything other than that you think you are rubber and I am glue.  

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:47 | Link to Comment TMT
TMT's picture

I hate the patriot act but beyond that sanders is fucking worthless.

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 04:27 | Link to Comment dolly madison
dolly madison's picture

His combined budget requests over the last few cycles are 610-0. I emphasize requests because that's all he can legitimately do...request to spend.

Even the brain dead Sen. Sanders has to abstain, that should tell you something.

What that seems to say to me is that the budget was too far right for the Democrats.  The Republicans would never vote for Obama's budget no matter what it is like.  I have no idea if that is really the case, just a guess based on circumstance.

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 06:35 | Link to Comment nmewn
nmewn's picture

It's O'Barry's budget requests that are continually voted down without a single vote in favor....simply because he asks too much spending and not enough debt & deficit reduction.

These are what never gets a single affirmative vote from either side (Dim or Pubs)...his budget requests. House & Senate budgets do get votes for & against like they always have...his never gets a single vote for.

There are many reasons for this in the House & Senate...but its still 610-0 on his.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:27 | Link to Comment f16hoser
f16hoser's picture

No truer words were spoken.....

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:26 | Link to Comment f16hoser
f16hoser's picture

No truer words were spoken.....

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:19 | Link to Comment vast-dom
vast-dom's picture

Obummer: HOPIUM that delivers CHANGE like you've never experienced: only prez with a perfect vote-down ZERO record! Maybe he can trade his Nobel for other more apropos prize? What an achievement!

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:22 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

His prize will be first African American Muslim socialist commie born in Kenya to completely ruin the country, crash the market, destroy the dollar, etc.  My theory is they crash the market BIG time a couple of months or maybe a few weeks before the election.  It will prove all the Red Teamers right, and O'Romney will float in on a wave of "thank God for the white Christian free market Wall Street guy."  Then he will proceed to take away whatever semblance of Freedom we have left, as the Red Team cheers him on.  Hope I'm wrong.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:40 | Link to Comment TheFourthStooge-ing
TheFourthStooge-ing's picture

Outcome of the 2012 presidential election: George W re-elected to a fourth term and four more years of the same shit, only worse.

You heard it here on ZeroHedge first, fuckers.

 

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:42 | Link to Comment markettime
markettime's picture

I hope you are wrong also Rand, but I agree that there will be an effort to take down the system as we know it and replace it with something worse. 

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:46 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

And who better to blame than Obama.  It's really quite brilliant.  

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:26 | Link to Comment JPM Hater001
JPM Hater001's picture

I believe what you were looking for was:

What, me worry?

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:45 | Link to Comment Freddie
Freddie's picture

*U*k! Tyler Dirksen - ZH is running those Hope and Change 2012 banner ads again for the The Ben Bernank fiat.  I am sick of seeing Travolta's boyfriend Barry and his disgusting beard wife.  

Hey Tyler - tell the ******g ad agency to run more of those snorge or other T-shirt company ads with the girls in tight t-shirts and panties.  Those banner ads are cool.  The one chick in sunglasses is hot.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:17 | Link to Comment TheFourthStooge-ing
TheFourthStooge-ing's picture

You control, to a certain extent, which ads you see. A determination is made by google ads, based on the cookies in your browser, which ads are displayed to you.

This is all based upon the web sites you've visited recently. If you want to see ads with hot babes in underwear instead of ads with hope and change, you need to visit porn sites with women more often and cut down on the visits to Obama sites.

 

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 23:06 | Link to Comment Global Hunter
Global Hunter's picture

I get ones for diets, diet aids and womens shoes after my wife has been on my computer.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 23:27 | Link to Comment Acorn10012
Acorn10012's picture

Shemp,

I've visited 372 porn sites and still can't get the sugar daddy girls. ;-)

The t-shirt girls are pretty hot as well.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 23:41 | Link to Comment TheFourthStooge-ing
TheFourthStooge-ing's picture

Keep trying.

 

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 01:42 | Link to Comment ClassicalLib17
ClassicalLib17's picture

Yea,  the ads I see all feature naked women with nice juicy tits.  Yummy

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:56 | Link to Comment LongSoupLine
LongSoupLine's picture

full retard fail

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:01 | Link to Comment Buck Johnson
Buck Johnson's picture

We will be a banana republic, and when it happens everyone will go nuts trust me.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 22:49 | Link to Comment Mentaliusanything
Mentaliusanything's picture

All of the kings horses and all the Kings men could not put paid to O'bumers plan.

and something ... something about....

"If you fail to plan, your planning to fail"

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 00:36 | Link to Comment Eireann go Brach
Eireann go Brach's picture

FUCKING Useless! Vote him in again and let him finish off pushing America over the cliff!

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 04:57 | Link to Comment ValidName
ValidName's picture

Exactly, like a 56 page bill crafted by Sessions is the same as the 2000 page budget bill.  But this fact escapes not only the original author, but the sheeple that follow him.  Sad that ZH has to stoop for content especially with so many events at the moment that could use some quality investigation.  Think and use your brains please, dump the partisan shit as thinking people really have no time for it.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 20:39 | Link to Comment navy62802
navy62802's picture

Obama? Who's that guy?

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 20:41 | Link to Comment A Nanny Moose
A Nanny Moose's picture

Failbama

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 20:39 | Link to Comment Id fight Gandhi
Id fight Gandhi's picture

It's those republicans in the senate!!!!

But wait its the senate democratically controlled? Yep? Oh, never mind.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 20:51 | Link to Comment A Nanny Moose
A Nanny Moose's picture

Blame will be assigned to the Blue Dogs....DINOs

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 20:39 | Link to Comment midgetrannyporn
midgetrannyporn's picture

We don't need no steenking budget!

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:44 | Link to Comment TheFourthStooge-ing
TheFourthStooge-ing's picture

Vichy, DC legislative arithmetic lesson: if there is no budget, there is no budget deficit.

 

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 20:42 | Link to Comment nmewn
nmewn's picture

The Big 0.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:24 | Link to Comment Gene Parmesan
Gene Parmesan's picture

0bama

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:34 | Link to Comment The Shootist
The Shootist's picture

Yepper

Thu, 05/17/2012 - 06:35 | Link to Comment Phil Free
Phil Free's picture

Heh. There's a Japanese anime called "Big O".  Big robot mechs.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 20:40 | Link to Comment Normalcy Bias
Normalcy Bias's picture

Obama, the Great Uniter!

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 20:48 | Link to Comment LetThemEatRand
LetThemEatRand's picture

Another male prostitute!

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:59 | Link to Comment LongSoupLine
LongSoupLine's picture

Vote Obama!

Change...shoved right up your middle class ass.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 20:41 | Link to Comment wisefool
wisefool's picture

Deadhorse: I'll pay my taxes when congress tells me why.

*wisefool: Reforming goldbugs since my PhD told me I had to go on a low sodium deit.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 20:55 | Link to Comment Cabreado
Cabreado's picture

What is this thing "Congress" that you speak of?

There is no "Congress."

Congress left the building a while ago.

That is part and parcel in the evaluation of exactly where We are, where We are not, and where We are going.

A broken Congress is the bellwhether... we're so deep into it, we've forgotten already.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 20:44 | Link to Comment Tijuana Donkey Show
Tijuana Donkey Show's picture

Wait. The republicans lifted his budget, and ran it? Pure genius, just wait till the ceiling comes due early, and they shut down the govmt. Maybe the revolution will come when SNAP isn't on time.....

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 20:43 | Link to Comment Guns N Metals
Guns N Metals's picture

Obama smokes rocks.

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 20:48 | Link to Comment Acorn10012
Acorn10012's picture

And midgets

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 20:56 | Link to Comment CashCowEquity
CashCowEquity's picture

and cocks

Wed, 05/16/2012 - 21:24 | Link to Comment Joe The Plumber
Joe The Plumber's picture

Lol he is the second dicksucking president after james buchanan. Too bad american newspapers wont discuss his relationship wirh his church choir director

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!