This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
The Other Side Of The Gold And Silver Coin
We have long-discussed the currency debasement, fiat-fiasco thesis for owning hard assets and only last night noted the discussion between Biderman and Sprott on the practicalities of this plan. What we found interesting was this week we have seen a number of quite bearish articles on the precious metals - most notably Bloomberg's chart-of-the-day has had two notes citing inventory build for Silver's imminent demise and lagging futures open interest as a sign of investor's losing conviction in gold. Given that we are fair-and-balanced we thought it worth sharing these technical insights and perhaps reflecting on what Eric Sprott noted (and Dylan Grice has previously highlighted) as the only thing that could break his 'hard asset' thesis - that the political and banker elite "come to their financial senses".
4/18/12. Bloomberg. Silver-Inventory Surge Means Decline In Prices (no link - reporter here)
The CHART OF THE DAY shows silver futures are down 2.5 percent in April, trimming this year’s rally to 13 percent, as the inventories on the Comex in New York climbed 2 percent this month, touching 141.59 million ounces on April 13, the highest since September 1997. The price may slip to $29.90 an ounce from yesterday’s close of $31.674, according to Melek.
“This clearly shows that there is no ready market for the metal as investment and electronic demand are declining,” said Melek, the head of commodity strategy in Toronto and the second-most accurate price forecaster tracked by Bloomberg during the eight quarters through March 31. “We could see a downward pressure on silver.”
“Even though inventories were rising, commodities climbed higher as there was optimism in the market,” Melek said. “But now, with fear of a China hard-landing and the European crisis coming back to the forefront, people are going to take notice that the data is telling them something.”
4/20. Jesse's Cafe Americain. Comex Silver Inventory Watch - Heading Into May-July Delivery Period
The long term decline in deliverable supply at this price level could become quite interesting.
The only ways to obtain more deliverable inventory to meet a bulge in demand is to game the rules on the ability to take physical delivery or let the price rise by buying on the open market.
The push by the CFTC for position limits may tighten the ability to take delivery from 1,500 to 1,000 contracts, but hedgers will be exempt from position limits on the short side. And the big silver short JPM claims to be a hedger.
I keep hearing stories of negotiated prices above the public quotes to buy off large delivery claims. I would be interested to know if anyone has proof of this. We know there are large agreements being conducted around the publicly quoted prices all the time. The FX pit traders walked out in protest over a recent occurrence. It does not take an economist to understand what this does to price discovery and market efficiency.
The estimates I have seen of how much silver is real and how much is conflicting paper claims (leverage of unallocated claims) is up to 100:1. Some of those claims are reported to be covered by 'inventory in the ground' which is not readily available for delivery.
One can only wonder how well confidence in the Comex would receive another 'stolen assets' scandal like the confiscation of gold and silver that happened to customers of MF Global.
The central banks have long ago dispersed their caches of silver to the market, so they are not available to supply ready inventory at leased rates. One might look to SLV and wonder who audits its custodial integrity of unencumbered physical bars and how often.
As I recall the sponsor of the ETF is Blackrock, but the custodian and keeper of the vault holding the physical silver backing the ETF is JP Morgan. As you may recall, JPM is holding a massive short position on the silver futures, as best we can determine.
JPM claims they are a hedge on behalf of other parties. If they are using the SLV inventory as collateral in any way, then someone needs to be paid a visit by the SEC and CFTC because the owners of the shares have a superior claim to the metal. That smells like 'hypothecation' in the manner of MF Global. But I suspect that rather than blaming Edith O'Brien one might blame Bear Stearns.
I am not saying this is 'illegal' but it certainly warrants disclosure if it is occurring. And if the CFTC knows this and is sitting on the information in their four year old and still unreleased silver manipulation report, then Gary Gensler needs to appear before the Congress and answer some very tough questions about conflicts of interest and withholding of key market information.
Of course the prudential time to ask those questions and obtain the answers is now, and not after the carnage of a commercial failure devastates investors, global industry, and market confidence.
Will anyone listen to this? Did anyone listen to Harry Markopolos before Madoff's fund blew up?
These days it seems like the US financial markets are a train wreck happening in slow motion. Or almost like watching a B horror movie. You hear the music and you know what's coming, but there is no way to warn the campers.
4/11/12. Bloomberg. Gold Holdings Signal Slump
Reduced holdings of gold futures in New York are signaling a further decline for prices that already are headed for their first three-month slide in more than a decade, according to Credit Suisse Securities AG.
The CHART OF THE DAY shows a 3.6 percent drop this year in the open interest, or the number of contracts that have yet to be closed, liquidated or delivered.
That “lack of conviction” by investors may send gold down more than 8.1 percent in the next few months to below $1,525 an ounce on the Comex in New York, said Cilline Bain, a technical analyst at Credit Suisse.
"Investors are willing to stand on the sidelines expecting prices to drift lower,” Bain said in a telephone interview from London. “The interest is clearly not there.”
And lastly - as a reminder - Dylan Grice Explains When To Sell Gold.
In brief: "Eventually, there will be a crisis of such magnitude that the political winds change direction, and become blustering gales forcing us onto the course of fiscal sustainability. Until it does, the temptation to inflate will remain, as will economists with spurious mathematical rationalisations as to why such inflation will make everything OK. Until it does, the outlook will remain favorable for gold. But eventually, majority opinion will accept the painful contractionary medicine because it will have to. That will be the time to sell gold."
»
- 23908 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
The only thing that bothers me about PM ownership is that any dumbo can buy it - and I find myself standing in the same enclosure with people I would normally avoid - sorry if that sounds snobbish or elitist, but that's just how it is.
Something that does not bother me is the growing 'anger' there seems to be against PMs - I ask myself why.. or rather why do they (the PTB) bother? There's very little explicit or overt anti-PM propaganda - now that makes me suspicious too. The last thing you do is draw attention to what your true motives are if you want to practice duplicity or deception - watch any antiques dealer rummage through aunty's box of 'old knick-knacks' and give a value. The arts practised at a yard/garage sale are same as those practised at GS/JPM/bullion banks/FED etc.
Quite frankly, if there weren't various nefarious double-dealings, rumours & scandals etc. surrounding the whole PM 'thing' I'd be very worried at this point & probably be thinking I should reduce my exposure or fret like you do when the stock declines.. well, we've all been there.
Finally - the inescapable math. The amount of forward consumption that most Western govts. & consumers have gone in for over the past 20 years or so mean, to me, the only option (for the above parties) is to devalue the the true value of that debt, but maintain nominal amount, i.e. de-value the unit of true purchasing power. It's the only thing that will work, ultimately. The Chinese know this, so won't rock the boat, but will steadily buy stuff with their $ reserves to get value while they can. So while I can't time the market in my purchases (of PMs) with privileged information, I can still do it.. and take my money out of the counterparty risk game, i.e. PM physical.
cheers, _underscore
"The only thing that bothers me about PM ownership is that any dumbo can buy it - and I find myself standing in the same enclosure with people I would normally avoid - sorry if that sounds snobbish or elitist, but that's just how it is."
Interesting, as my butler was thinking the same about you as he stood next to you at the coin display.
PM's are a tool, just don't be one............
Yes, not very well expressed by me - the point being that the dumbos I'm referring to are the 'to da moon' type of commenters who can't read a chart or do any fundamental thinking about the 'why' part.
I'm sure though, Camtender, as you have your own butler, you're not one of those.
As a dumbo I resent your remarks but am consoled by the fact that my gold will be worth as much as yours. Even though I am not smart enough to figure out why.
Personally that's the quality that I love about PM's. Any member of society can potentialy save and preserve their wealth. One does not need to have many thousands or millions or billions to have some degree financial security. I'm sure banks make a good bit of their money off tons of elitist "dumbos" who don't know shit about what is being done with their personal fortune.
The interview with Melek was on BNN, they forgot to mention Melek also said Silver trade back to near $40 this year.
http://watch.bnn.ca/#clip662121
2:50 into the interview he says Silver will touch $39 in the 4th quarter.
I think thats correct. If silver follows its normal trend it will reach all time highs in 1Q13.
Hold on to your metal. If goldman or morgan is involved, they'll do what it takes to support their positions, but hold tight!
Dollar will remain the curency-du-jour until the US Gov runs out of ammo and heavy weapons. Why is that so freakin' difficult to understand ????
The clowns are back at it with the con game in the Chicago toliet in the forfront. This is Ben Bernakes work at play here, he set out to kick Gold and it worked, ..short term because that miserable clown will be printing more confetti very shortly.
If it is not listed as registered deliverable silver, it is a silver debt the COMEX owes other people. It may or may not even exist. It is only inventory in the loosest of Bernie Madoff accounting terms.
If deliverable silver is in a nosedive, and silver the COMEX owes (claims to be storing) others is climbing, I see a bigger inventory problem than I had before.
There is no reason deliverable silver would be dropping while total inventories are rising. The two should not diverge that much. The fact that they started to diverge during the MF global scandal is another problem I have with this information.
Something is wrong. I will take my physical. Thanks.
This just out from Survival Blog:
http://survivalblog.com/nickels.html