Sky News Reports Israel Preparing For Preemptive Strike On Iran
First Fukushima made a repeat appearance last night with news of a repeat fission incident, a topic which has gotten absolutely zero media coverage as discussing beta, let alone gamma decay, is considered uncouth in refined society; now it is time for the fallback geopolitical hotbed to enter the stage. Sky News has reported that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is trying to rally support in his cabinet for an attack on Iran, according to government sources. "The country's defence minister Ehud Barak and the foreign minister Avigdor Lieberman are said to be among those backing a pre-emptive strike to neutralise Iran's nuclear ambitions. But a narrow majority of ministers currently oppose the move, which could trigger a wave of regional retaliation. The debate over possible Israeli military action has reached fever pitch in recent days with newspaper leader columns discussing the benefits and dangers of hitting Iran. Mr Lieberman responded to the reports of a push to gain cabinet approval by saying that "Iran poses the most dangerous threat to world order." But he said Israel's military options should not be a matter for public discussion." Which makes one wonder: why is Sky News reporting on this, and why is it a matter for public discussion?
More from Sky:
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is due to report on the state of Iran’s nuclear capabilities on November 8, and that assessment is likely to influence Israel’s decision.
Western intelligence officials estimate that Iran is still at least two to three years away from obtaining a nuclear bomb.
Israel has long made it clear that it will not allow Iran to obtain a nuclear capability that could threaten the Jewish State.
Publicly it is pushing for a diplomatic offensive against Iran - including the imposition of sanctions - rather than a military strike.
But prime minister Netanyahu has repeatedly warned that all options are on the table.
Israel's former defence minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer told Haraatez newspaper that he feared a "horror scenario" if Israel attacked Iran.
Washington is also strongly opposed to Israel taking unilateral action.
Any strike on Iran could trigger retaliation from Iran and across the region.
Syria, a close ally of Tehran, could also launch attacks, along with the Iranian-backed Hizbollah militia in Lebanon.
All of this will surely end well if enacted. In the meantime, we present our favorite weekly chart update which we don't show nearly enough.
(9 votes)
»
- Login or register to post comments
- 29199 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:
- On Israel and Iran
- Israel Accuses Russia Of Supporting Iran Terror Organizations, Says Iran Has Enough Material For 4 Nuclear Bombs
- CVN 77 G.H.W. Bush Enters Persian Gulf As CIA Veteran Robert Baer Predicts September Israel-Iran War
- Iran To Israel: "We'll Show You Hell"
- Guest Post: Iranian Bushehr Nuclear Plant Comes Online - World Survives
Israel is simply doing the bidding of it's American master. No big surprise here. The spice must flow, and for a supressed price as well. Junk away fucknuts, entropy will get you too.
Let Israel do what Israel wants to do.
Just leave American blood out of it.
We've got enough fuckng problems.
http://fucklloydblankfein.blogspot.com
Seriously. It's American Master?! Dumb-dumb. I thought the Vatican was it's master, lolz. Idiot spin troll.
So you want to bet that America won't support Israel with troops and treasure (well more debt laid upon the taxpayer)? Come on, put your money were you mouth is you fucking ignorant sheep. I'll even give you 1000 to one odds. You know America will all too happily provide blood and treasure for the Rothschild's war into an oil rich region. How fucking stupid are you?
I'm this stupid.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/sky-news-reports-israel-preparing-preempti...
Thanks for confirming. Have a nice day.
There's nothing like surprise when you launch a surprise attack, and this is nothing like surprise.
This has got to be one of the world's best kept secrets...
expect the death toll to be high with this one...
That's the plan. The Sabbateans (Netanyahu, Barak, Lieberman and Peres) are no friends of the jews ... but are, coincidentally, good buddies with Rome.
Oh good! Looks like WE'LL be the ones carrying this out:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/02/uk-military-iran-attack-nuclear
There is a silver lining to all of this. If Israel attacks Iran, we'll rush in like a bunch of war-starved mofos. And when that happens, more people will wake up to Ron Paul's message.
I'm not sure how many more silver linings the world can take.
and that would be why kbr was hired to fill the camps?
this machine WILL move forward.
'But they warned the calculations could change because of mounting anxiety over intelligence gathered by western agencies, and the more belligerent posture that Iran appears to have been taking'
beyond bizarre, and are we supposed to still believe in WMD, the tooth fairy and santa clause?
It's well established the Rabbis, even to this day, state that the Jews killed by the Third Reich got what they deserved for disobeying and turning away from the Rabbis. An interesting twist: While Rabbi-sycophant John McCain ran for president last time, he was condemned for hooking up with Zionist Churchian John Hagee. How'd McCain divorce Hagee? McCain's campaign condemed Hagee for saying exactly what the Rabbis say all the time: g_d bless Hitler for killing the Jews who disobyed the Rabbis! It's OK when they say it, you know, like when blacks use the N word.
Upon order of their Rabbi masters, the 1st Session of the 102nd US Congress passed Public Law 102-14 in 1991. This law accords "...official recognition of the Federal government's legal oblication 'to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws'...Stupid, naive goyim are not told that in order to faithfully adhere to the so-called Seven Laws of Noah, 'righteous gentiles' are obligated to submit to rabbinic interpretations of those laws. The Talmud commands the death penalty for idolatry. Since Rabbi Maimonides ruled that Christians are idolaters, US law laid the groudwork for the execution at some future date (when the Rabbis have complete control) of authentic Christians.
No words (except for maybe some Yiddish) can accurately describe the extent to which goyim are suckered by the philosophy of the Rabbis.
You seem to be flying off on some weird tangent!!
The only thing that Public Law 102-14 of the US Congress resolved was that one of the 365 days in the year 1991 be declared as "Education Day, U.S.A."!!!
Here is the full resolution (from here):
Some goys are obviously more easily suckered than others!! ;)
Obfuscation, lying, denial, and edited/censored text are prime ingredients of "Rabbinical Talmudism", which your post promotes. See this link:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c102:H.J.RES.104.ENR:
Your edited version omits the 2nd line from above:
"...Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws..."
Again: The Rabbis can and do, at their whim, interpret the "Seven Noahide Laws" to mean whatever they want whenever they want. Now, while the Rabbis lack total control (though they gain in power daily), they do not line up Christians and kill them for idolatry.
But Rabbi Maimonedes indeed labels Christianty as idol worship. So indeed, when their power is fully realized, the above law could and will be enforced and Christians will be slaughtered wholesale, same as Arab-Islam is now.
"Futurism" is the Zionist-quasi-Chrisitan false belief that Jesus returns in the future in Jerusalem. False/marginal Chrisitans wrongly believe that "physical Israel" still exists. The truth is since 70AD there is no physical Israel from a Biblical viewpoint. So faith in a physical Israel is the true Christian idolatry. The belief in a "chosen race", saved by race (not grace) is the true idolatry promoted by every single Rabbi, no matter how big the smile on his face.
Sheesh! You can't fix stupid!!
I quoted the resolution (ie. what has been resolved to enact), while you are simply quoting [again] from the preamble (ie. meaningless assumptions).
Still..., if I had to pick a side, and just to piss a lot of you off, I'd choose Israel.
That's ok...
I can feel another Nobel Peace Prize coming this way...
...warm & fuzzy.
Yep. Obomber is a shoo in ... with a piece of Iran for the oil men and a piece of Israel (Jerusalem under a NATO "piece keeping" force) for Rome. Win-win all round!
Might be a few casualties (like, most of the Shi'ites and Jews gone), but you can't make an omelette without.......
oh those poor Jews, always so taken advantage of... and kicked out of so many countries throughout history for no good reason.... after all the good they have done with their monetary and "religious" practices too... /s... all that good stuff they learned in babylon, and no one appreciates them for it.
Tosser...
ive said for years now, after watching an episode of star trek tng, i know how to deal with this problem. just pick them up, and move them to nevada, arizona or utah. its all sand and we aint usin it. problem fkin' solved. you dont loose any square footage, and no more rocket attacks.
and if by chance our sand isnt good enough, and you have to have THAT sand....we will transplant it....over here.
Aaaah better check your facts ..
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/sky-news-reports-israel-preparing-preemptive-strike-iran
It's bowl shit. If Israel is going to do something it does it first then stays silent afterwards. The fact that there are leaks and public discussion leads me to believe they don't have the capability or know that it will cause a shitstorm that they may not be able to deal with after the strike is done.
Or better yet.... the US has told them their planes might get shot out of the sky if the try anything stupid. This is unlikely though given how we walk around with our tongues out ready to give the Israelis a rim job anytime they so request one.
No no silly, the "leaks" are to get Iran to strike first so Isreal is justified. Remember, its not assault if they throw the first punch son...
AmericanFUPAcabra I think you get it. This is all a psyop to draw the Iranians and their proxies out. Syria has bio/chem weapons. If one of them touches down on Israel, Israel then has the green light to do what it takes. I wouldn't want to be in Demascus nor Tehran right now, or Israel for that matter. I hear it will really take tac nukes to dig out the burried Iranian weapons plants. Bunker busters may not cut it.
And then will the Iranians hold us reponsible? I've heard rumors of at least five former Soviet nukes smuggled in. Will they go boom?
"Israelis"??? WTH? You mean they are not "Israelites", god's "chosenites", saved by "race"?
"Rothschild's war"
Exactly.
Like I've said before: the real wizards behind the curtain are the Zen Buddhists and/or the Hutterites.
OPEN YOUR EYES!
7th Day Adventists are controlling Barrack Obama with radio waves
Amish jihad, bitches!
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." - Einstein"
Israel recently tested a missile that can hit Iran with a nuclear warhead, so shit could hit the fan very, very soon.
Dropping nukes on Iran would be insane. I'm not taking a side either way here, just trying to be objective. The saber rattling has intensified recently, and with the alleged plot to assassinate an ambassador to Saudi Arabia, I think they are setting up to allow Israeli planes......somewhere, via S.A.
That said, a nuke attack on an operating reactor is unthinkable. Why would the PTB want to irradiate one of the largest known oil reserves in the world? Isn't that self defeating? What would stop Syria, Lebanon and Egypt from simultaneously going apeshit on Israel? After all, they cant nuke everyone and surround themselves with radiation now can they?
It wouldn't irradiate the oil if it was below ground...
I agree, but if the ground above the oil were turned in to a giant sheet of irradiated Trinitite, how would you get the oil below?
Drill sideways...
I drink YOUR milkshake.
+1 for the DDL refrence
cant wait for the LINCOLN movie. show me the REAL man. the one that hung like 50 horse theives in the largest public exucition ever, or something like that.
...Dropping nukes on Iran would be insane.
Thinking you are God's chosen people is insane. But once this worldview is taken into consideration, it allows you to view Israel's actions with some realism.
This fellow told me yesterday that nuclear war is no big deal:
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/guest-post-increasing-volatility-prelude-crash#comment-1833252
Well, this is TPTB trying to throw some stuff at the stuff flying towards the fan in hopes of deflecting it away from imminent fan hitage. Sorta like a missile shield. When people start buying oil with gold, then the stuff will have officially hit the fan. Unfortunately, so much stuff is flying around fan hitage is unavoidable at this point. TPTB are going to have to put a serious amount of stuff in the air to protect the fan from all this other stuff.
you just made me think of how they monitor all the objects orbiting the planet. sounds funny when you replace earth with a giant fan.
hey, what did i just do to enlarge my text?
all i did was post.
Iran has a lot of "sunburst" missiles , you cannot stop the they fly at about 7000 feet per second and are very accurate, goodbuy aircraft carriers
Assuming a converted ohio class cruise missle sub doesn't clean the coast of them first. Ultimately agree though, carriers are a big target easily overwhelmed by realtively cheap missiles.
ever heard of a sea wiz?
a mosquito couldnt get past that thing.
4 billion shots per second or something stupid like that. its designed to shoot down incomming missles. one day the guys were screwing around and decided to send a signal to block the sea wiz. it locked onto the tower that was broadcasting the signal, and proceded to saw it in half, crashing on the deck, before returning to its original target.
And people wonder why Iran is interested in nukes.
Indeed. Although I am against nuclear proliferation, I can't help but feel the whole world would be a lot safer if Iran had nukes. That's about the only thing that would stop Israel/US/NATO from ganging up on it. NUKES IN IRAN FOR WORLD PEACE!
Read Michael Collins' books. JFK ordered Israel not to go nuclear because it would start endless nuclear proliferation (JFK also planned to take apart the CIA because it was a loose cannon, the 4th branch of government). Mossad killed JFK (an American coupe), LBJ OK's Israel to go nuclear, and away you go.
Stone's JFK movie was pretty accurate except of course the Jewish (are there Jews in Hollywood?) producers left out the Mossad part.
Sky News reports, it must be true, An integral part of the "Fair and Balanced Family Propaganda System" piped right into your home. For a modest monthly fee.
how many times did this rumor go around already?
And like the Israelis are going to let SKy news know before they hit so the Iranians can be prepared for it
the Iranians have been ready for a long time. Not like they don't know that Iran is number 1 on Rothschild hit list. But Iran is no Libya, once they start this in motion the world will be forever changed.
Rothschild couldn't give a shit about Iran ... but the papists do. To the Vatican, Shia Islam is a heresy (because they don't recognise the Pope as the sole spiritual leader of the planet with a hotline to God) whereas the Sunnis (eg. Saudi Arabia) are more accomodating. Hence the coming engineered battle of mutual destruction between the Jews and the Shia - with NATO watching on the sidelines and supplying both sides with munitions to "keep it interesting".
I respectfully disagree. it is the Christians and Muslims that have been pitted against each other. And we don't really need to speculate why or by who. The vatican is just a useful tool, certainly not the top dog in the NWO, basically a strawman to direct attention away from the real power. Notice how the pope is used to make the call for a world bank... would be a bit too obvious if the Rothschilds did it directly. besides, that is not how it works, they play from behind the scenes.
By whom? Are you suggesting that Rothschild was around in 610AD when Muhammad was tutored by the Augustinians (who ghost-wrote the Khoran) and then married a Catholic nun?
Riiiiight. A useful tool with 2 billion adherents, a few hundred thousand scheming academic clergy working under an ideology, thousands of committed "knights" (crusaders) under various Orders - and an unbroken 1,800 year history of attempting to rule the world from Rome.
Nearly all current world leaders have sworn allegiance to Rome. The RIIA, Bilderberg, Trilateral, CFR and various other think tanks were all started by Knights of Malta who swore allegiance to Rome. All the major secret societies are also directed from Rome. But you seem to think that Rothschild and a couple of other bankers are planning everything over a game of croquet ... and have been doing so for centuries? Think again.
That wasn't the Pope ... that was some functionary in the Vatican trying to be "helpful" to the European mess that let the cat slip out of the bag, then the story was buried faster than you could say "Hail Mary". I'll bet that Cardinal has since been demoted to a novice! There was zero coverage from either mainstream or alternative media (not a mention on ZH; no comment from Alex Jones; a short-lived link on Drudge) until Max Keiser briefly covered it a week later (then also removed the brief separately-headlined clip from his blog the next day). That story was not meant to come out ... yet!
It is indeed planned from behind the scenes, but not controlled by whom you think it is. The nobility, priests and bankers have always worked together ... they need each other.
Unfortunately we have contractural (treaty) obligations signed in blood.
talking about those contracts, YOU STILL OWN ME 6 POUNDS OF YOUR FLESH!!
Hey , no pounds allowed don't euro know ! ..
... we're metricated now ,
The new expression is : " 450 grams of flesh , no fat , no carbon miles . "
I don't think that plays with the mouth-breathers over here. Best I can make of their silly little beliefs, apparently Israel has to exist in order for the cosmic zombie to return and establish the reign of the undead.
Hopefully, Israel and Iran nuke each other to a complete extinction. Two malignant cancers will be removed at once.
Both Iraq and Libya were a very convenient target: Gaddafi and Saddam did not believe in being invaded and were ready to negotiate to the dead end.
If Iranians make it clear that the military actions will take place in Israel, France, Germany, and England, there will not be any war. The fucking West is looking for easy targets. It is not ready for a real war. It is only good fighting with CIA-controlled phantom Al Qaida “terrorists”. Note how many Al Qaida leaders were killed and none of Taliban.
The history note. The Soviet scientist Andrei Sakharov, in late 1950s, proposed to mined American Pacific and Atlantic coasts with 100MT nuclear devices and, at the first US provocation, blow them up. If Nikita Khrushchev listened to him, there would not be any arm race.
So far, the pattern has been - If you have nukes (North Korea, Pakistan, Iran so far), you get left alone. If not (Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, etc), you get invaded.
My take is, even the Caesars knew better than to bring a hardened army home to a restive populace.
that 9 people like this and two disagree doesn't say much for the humanity of zero hedge comment board.
Two tumors. America is the main cancerous mass, and it has been metastasizing since the end of WWII.
Could it be that British policy in Palestine in the years 1945 to 1948, which limited immigration in order to keep the peace in the region, can now be seen to have been wiser than the Soviet backed formation of the state of Israel?
Can we look forward to the banning of that propaganda film "Exodus" which unfairly villifies what is now obvious as a sensible and humane policy?
And the black swans just keep on coming...hell of a wedge formation appearing.
"hell of a wedge formation appearing"
Is that a bullish or bearish pattern?
The tail trying to wag the dog may render both worth less.
Who has Iran ever attacked, can anyone name a single strike theyve ever carried out on anyone?
Iraq, whom we were arming at the time, when Rumsfeld was meeting, greeting, wining and dining Saddam Hussein, like he was one of his best buddies in the whole wide world.
Bunga-Bunga
(Actually, I do believe it was Iraq that attacked Iran, however, so to answer your question directly, no - though the Persian Empire did attack Leonidas and his 300)
no, iraq attacked first. tried to use a blitzkreig kind of thing. ran out of steam and bogged down in one of the cities in iran, where resistance became stronger and stronger.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GaOEnctICcs
husseins's conscripts were poorly trained and bolted had problems at the first sight of trouble.
We'll try not to mention the Persian empire shall we?
We must hate on them because they don't let young women get on the pole by nine years of age.
That's not the problem, it's middle aged men on the poll that's the problem.
Iran under the current régime hasn’t had the balls to attack anyone directly. They have been responsible for numerous attacks though their proxies such Hezbollah. They are also a major supplier of weapons to jihadi groups. Ahmadinejad believes he was put on earth by god to bring on the Muslim apocalypse. As to whether he has the capability or not is a subject for debate. Hitter also announced his intentions to the world and nobody paid much attention.
really, and you know all that because Fox news and/or U.S. intelligence reported it? must be so... but wait, curious who the world's largest arms supplier is? yeah that's right, the largest terrorist organization in the world, responsible for more dealth and destruction than any force in world history.... the so called "good guys".... U.S. and its war club, Nato, aka, ZATO, zionist armies of total occupation.
Exactly... I thought that was Bill O'Reilly for a moment.. Still not sure..
Spot on. The largest rim of them all!
Spot on. The largest rim of them all!
Robert Neville , that is the biggest load of crap I have ever heard, IF Iran wanted nukes they would buy them from Russia but they dont because it is againts there religion .We have so many sanction against Iran it makes it hard for them to even sell there oil. "America is the terrorist of the world"
It’s all well documented. I worked on a project pertaining to IED’s used in various places. A surprising number of the components come from Iran. Read some of Ahmadinejad’s speeches instead of barking out your ass with kneejerk anti-Americanism. For real fun watch his last speech in front of the UN. The guy is a total nut job. By the way, I didn't even mention nukes.
. . . and I take it you've "read some" of his speeches, in their original language, not the numerous western "translations" variants from the various nooos sources indoctrinating the masses, yes?
I've no love for the guy, but to base a nuclear attack on a nation's peoples because of mis-reported, deliberately mis-represented speeches is the height of insanity - ahhh, carry on. . .
"A surprising number of the components come from Iran."
So finally we see the consequence of American policy to allow "self determination".
When the third world were under the benevolent care of the European empires, they were stuck as primary producers while anything "technological" was manufactured in Europe.
This enlightened policy ensured that the subject peoples were not only ruled by enlightened Europeans, but were also unable to mount an effective challenge to this natural order.
Additionally, were these empires still in existence would we now be facing tropical deforestation outside of South America? No. What a disaster American post WWII policy has turned out to be.
there are about 100,000 persian jews living in iraq. there are many jews high up in government and in the armed forces there. iran has had a long standing agreement with israhole that any jew that wishes to move to israhole may do so without any problems. iranians have no problems with jews per se. if it was so bad for jews in iran, then why don't they all leave? hell, the president himself is a jew, for crying out loud.......so all of this talk about iran bad, is just bullshit...........things in this world are never the way they are portrayed by the media or any talking head....you have to dig and study on it , and see the game that they are playing .........they know most people will not do this.........the internet is there for all to use to study and enlighten one's self. do it while you still can.
Eggzactly. HPD and ZackAttack with his pointed observations...
war-memes-me-iran-israel-uk-us-social-engineering-planted-stories
ORI
BY PROXY US SOLDIERS IN iRAQ
AND THE ISRAELI EMBASSY IN ARGENTINA
BUT THESE ARE SMALL MATTERS
THEY ARE AFTER ALL A PEACE LOVING PEOPLE
Well, they did induce the turd Bush into destroying their one natural enemy and handing them a dominant position in the ME.
But that's just pwnage, and well-played, not an actual invasion.
That is why we HAVE to attack them we cannot be having them spread there un-American ways around the world ,good God no more wars living in peace that is not an option