Some Shocking Perspectives On Inflation And Currency Destruction By None Other Than The Federal Reserve

Tyler Durden's picture

Going back to the FOMC's own archives reveals some truly stunning disclosures arising from none other than the Federal Reserve on the topics of inflation, currency "debauching", money creation, and what it would take for the Communists and Stalin to win.

We begin with this 1951 letter from then Fed Chairman Thomas McCabe to Senator O'Mahoney defending the true independence of the Fed, and in objection to its being subsumed by the Treasury-banker oligarchy superclass:

I agree with you entirely that the Soviet dictators would like to bring about our economic collapse and, as you know, inflation is perhaps the greatest force for arraying the various sectors of a capitalistic economy against each other. John Maynard Keynes stated in his 'Economic Consequences of the Peace' (1919): 'Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the Capitalist System was to debauch the currency...Lenin was certainly right. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of Society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose.'

...

Confidence of the public in Government securities as well as in other forms of liquid savings is inextricably bound up with public confidence in the value of the dollar. With the large overhand of such liquid savings, and considering among other things the heavy maturities of savings bonds coming up next year, it is extremely important that confidence in the dollar be firmly established by Government policies that destroy the inflation threat at its roots. Continuation of too easy money policies will make it next to impossible to engender confidence in the sustained real value of Government securities.

 

The interest cost on the public debt should be as low as is consistent with economic stability. Interest rates should be high enough, however, so that the debt will be bought and firmly held by the investing public and will not need the support of an undue amount of money creation.... We should also keep in mind that interest rates on short-term Government securities also decline in periods of recession as they did in the 30's and more recently in 1949. I am old fashioned enough to believe that history will repeat itself and that over a period of years interest rates will fluctuate with changing economic conditions.

 

The Federal Reserve has always tried to avoid conflict with the Treasury. The record over the years shows patience, compromise and much sacrifice of basic convictions to this end. I am still hopeful that a basis of mutual understanding and agreement can be reached. If not, we will have no defensible alternative save but to do what, in our considered judgment, is for the best interests of the country, in accordance with our statutory responsibilities. We can, of course, always go to the Congress that created us and to whom we report and appeal for a redefinition of our responsibilities.

Source: Fed Intermeeting Executive Minutes, February 14, 1951

Not if in the pursuit of central planning, the Fed has effectively made Congress and its persistent inability to pass any laws, obsolete. But let's go on with the following statement by Fed governor Marriner Eccles:

[We are making] it possible for the public to convert Government securities into money to expand the money supply....We are almost solely responsible for this inflation. It is not deficit financing that is responsible because there has been surplus in the Treasury right along; the whole question of having rationing and price controls is due to the fact that we have this monetary inflation, and this committee is the only agency in existence that can curb and stop the growth of money.... [W]e should tell the Treasury, the President, and the Congress these facts, and do something about it....We have not only the power but the responsibility....If Congress does not like what we are doing, then they can change the rules.

Source: FOMC Minutes, 2/6/51, pp. 50–51

We continue with this pearl from the same Eccles:

We favor the lowest rate of interest on government securities that will cause true investors to buy and hold these securities. Today’s inflation. . . is due to mounting civilian expenditures largely financed directly or indirectly by sale of Government securities to the Federal Reserve.... The inevitable result is more and more money and cheaper and cheaper dollars.

Source: FOMC Minutes, 2/7/51, p. 60

We continue with this excerpt from Fed Governor Martin's speech accepting the appointment to the Board of Governors:

Unless inflation is controlled, it could prove to be an even more serious threat to the vitality of our country than the more spectacular aggressions of enemies outside our borders. I pledge myself to support all reasonable measures to preserve the purchasing power of the dollar.

We end with this underappreciated exchange between Marriner Eccles and Representative Wright Patman, confirming that the Fed has not been independent in over 60 years

Patman: Don’t you think there is some obligation of the Federal Reserve System to protect the public against excessive interest rates?
Eccles: I think there is a greater obligation to the American public to protect them against the deterioration of the dollar.
Patman: Who is master, the Federal Reserve or the Treasury? You know, the Treasury came here first.
Eccles: How do you reconcile the Treasury’s position of saying they want the interest rate low, with the Federal Reserve standing ready to peg the market, and at the same time expect to stop inflation?
Patman: Will the Federal Reserve System support the Secretary of the Treasury in that effort [to retain the 2 1/2 percent rate] or will it refuse?. . . You are sabotaging the Treasury. I think it ought to be stopped.
Eccles: [E]ither the Federal Reserve should be recognized as having some independent status, or it should be considered as simply an agency or a bureau of the Treasury. (U.S. Congress 1951, pp. 172–76)

Source: U.S. Congress 1951, pp. 172–7

And as an added bonus, we demonstrate that using the threat of Mutual Assured Destruction if politicians (coughhankpaulsoncough) don't get what they want, the end is nigh. From president Harry Truman's letter to Fed governor Thomas McCabe:

[W]e must combat Communist influence on many fronts.. . . [I]f the people lose confidence in government securities all we hope to gain from our military mobilization, and war if need be, might be jeopardized.”

 

I hope the Board will. . . not allow the bottom to drop from under our securities. If that happens that is exactly what Mr. Stalin wants.

Source: FOMC Minutes, 1/31/1951

By "Communist influence" and "Stalin" America's 33rd president, Harry Truman, a "Democrat", of course meant the US Treasury which needed to find, at any cost, a funder of only resort for what would one day become trillion dollar annual deficits, and the US banker superclass, which needed, at any cost, to have full control over the entity that would print US currency at will whenever the specter of deflation threatened to destroy all the accumulated equity-based wealth of the status quo.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
GetZeeGold's picture

 

 

 

Only Ben Shalom and Jon Corzine have immunity.

 

nope-1004's picture

Must.Not.Let.Silver.Pass.36.$

 

 

economics9698's picture

The Fed increased the monetary base 18% in the 50s, most of it to finance the Korean War.  What a difference from today.

nom deplune's picture

GZG Please stop with the inane comments...it really is tiresome. How you come up with this shit is beyond me.

I was so fucking glad when they banned you from the Kitco forum.

economics9698's picture

How in the fuck do you get banned from a gold forum?

akak's picture

If one is a member of the hyper-controlled, rigidly-monitored, overtly unfree Kitco mockery of a forum, being banned is only a matter of time --- it is impossible to avoid indefinitely, due to the crazily thin-skinned, uber-politically-correct, and utterly intolerant "moderators" employed by Kitco.  And above all, NEVER insult nor highlight in any way the disingenuous anti-gold propaganda of their intellectually and morally crippled official spokesman, Jon Nadler.

(And "moderator" ynot2k, you vile and malicious bastard, may you rot in Hell for your extreme intolerance, capricious abuse of power, and gross hypocrisy.)

Stoploss's picture

"...not one man in a million years is capable of diagnosing..

 

Get it right God Dammit.

Darth Rayne's picture

I've worked it out. The FED creates inflation. Otherwise we would have deflation.

Deflation is the productive mans gift to mankind.

With deflation :-

20 year olds will spend every dollar, without worrying too much about anything.

30 years olds will spend every dollar too, but worry about it.

40 year olds will save to retire at 50.

50 year olds who are still working are probably enjoying it.

The Financial Elite won't like it! Really clever people will be retiring at 30!

unununium's picture

Yes.  That is correct.

In fact they do not even try to hide it.  See the Fed minutes from the post-internet-bubble period, when they explicitly listed fear of deflation as the reason for easing.

Rising productivity would natrually lead to deflation if not countered by an increasing money supply.

In some sectors (computers) the productivity gains are so high you still get deflation anyway.  The world does not implode.  Everybody just gets cheaper computers.

 

Silver Bug's picture

The FED is good for only one thing. Printing money. Vast amounts of it.

 

http://jamesturkblog.blogspot.ca/

TideFighter's picture

I have a whole new respect for twolips.

Zadok's picture

Somehow I think there are more than 300 or so that have properly diagnosed the issue!

howenlink's picture

Stalin for the win!

sansnobel's picture

To Infinity and Beyond!!!! (Bernanke Buzz Lightyear)

Zadok's picture

Hmmmm, ask Gideon about his 300. Much can be done with few.

BlackholeDivestment's picture

Very interesting you mentioned this, in light of the Arab Spring turning Summer, as in the days of Noah. 

 

ParkAveFlasher's picture

Reasonable and rational men used to be the leaders.  Now, they are the hunted ones.

Banksters's picture

Eat shit, slaves-Dr. Bernank

darteaus's picture

The problem with the Kenynesian "Print Mo' Money" solution, is that once you give the keys of the printing press to the politicians, they never turn it off.

Seer's picture

That's been my concern with doing away with the Fed, that all would then be controlled by politicians.  There's really not, I think, any clear win (given only these two choices).

chistletoe's picture

"We will bury you" .... Nikita Kruschev.

The press picked it up but the american media misunderstood  and misconstrued what he meant so pathetically .....

 

While it may seem to some of the commenters here that the time and effort of reading "War and Peace" is not worth the gain,

I found that it reveals a great, great deal about russian strategy .... it is still workinng the same way .... and it works so well ....

GetZeeGold's picture

 

 

"We will bury you" .... Nikita Kruschev

 

Almost there comrades...

 

 

Catullus's picture

You have the 60 year play book. They buy treasuries or the dollar collapses. Simple as that. The bonds are always money-good. There can be no other way for this system to survive.

Btw, this has been the case since the mid 19th century and Jay Cook cornered the federal government loan origination market. The government allows the banks to leverage so long as they use government debt as the leveraging instrument. It's that simple. The Fed will always hold the line on the government debt market.

LawsofPhysics's picture

Nothing "shocking" here, price discovery is long dead.

Banksters's picture

Jon Corzine says, suck my ballsack, I'm above the law.

Seer's picture

"I'm above the law."

No, he's beyond the ENFORCEMENT of the law.  How fucking convenient...

pavman's picture

USA! USA! USA!

thomasincincy's picture

funny you say that...this past weekend many drunkin young and old adults were chanting this same thing at a local brewing establishment. little do they know, as george carlin once said. they all have a red, white and blue dick jammed up their ass. laughable

Turin Turambar's picture

Tree + Rope + Fed banksters = a good start

Snakeeyes's picture

And those idiots are trying to create ANOTHER housing bubble!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://confoundedinterest.wordpress.com/2012/09/18/why-did-the-fed-do-qe...

El's picture

Like his opinion on gold, Mr. Bernanke thinks those comments are barbaric relics. #Idiot

Cognitive Dissonance's picture

There goes the Feds plausible deniability.

/sarc

centerline's picture

I fully expect the Fed will be long gone from the equation when the system goes down.  The rhetoric lately all feels the same... the baton is being passed to the politicians.  And we all know where that leads.

Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

QEX is issued and political flareups ensue.

Ironic?

What if China was going to spend their dollars but then Japan, by proxy of the US (Trilateral Commission), began to take their eyes off of finance and towards war?

Same with the flareups in the ME. 

The Central Planners have gone full retard and will need distraction after distraction to keep everyone to not see the collapsing fiat "money" system.  All fiat is now dead.  This will be realized by the status quo shortly, if by war or wonder.

gwar5's picture

"We're all Communists Now"

mayhem_korner's picture

 

 

Outstanding post.  No one ever uses the word "profound" to describe things that aren't true.  The Eccles / Patman exchange is priceless.

Ted Baker's picture

WE CONTINUE OUR BEARISH VIEW:- SHORTING EURO, US FINANCIALS AND US HOUSING STOCKS PERIOD....WE HOWEVER LIKE PHYSICAL GOLD AND CURRENCIES LIKE CAD, MXN & CHF BUT SHORTING THE AUD AND GBP....THANK U BEN

FoodStampPrez's picture

Our once great nation can now be conquered without firing a single shot.

TideFighter's picture

On the contrary-me thinks many shots will be fired.

phaedrus1952's picture

This posting should rank right up there with the WSJ's editorial No Guard Rails on several decades ago as regards truth and timeliness. Tylers, I both appreciate an applaud all your efforts.

Bear's picture

The FED will always do what is necessary to protect the banks ... it just happens now that inflation is good and back then inflation was bad for the banks

loveyajimbo's picture

I thought Bernank Shalom was a historian...??  Or does he just collect Hagannah GI Joes to fluff his duff with?

 

WRITE IN RON PAUL!!!!!!!

Bear's picture

Write in Ron Paul ... elect Obama ... great plan

HeliBen's picture

https://www.intrade.com/v4/markets/contract/?contractId=743474 

Obummer looking good for a second term, but we can all blame it on the Libs and Ron Paul write ins later.

Bear's picture

Another four years of Obama will be far worse than four years of Romney ... Obamacare, Cap/Trade, and energy strangulation will bury us

ATM's picture

That isn't what will bury us. Debt is what will bury us, Obama is only creating his own army of entitled fucktards for when the shit hits the fan. He's building his own idiot fighters for totalitarianism, they are just too stupid to know it.