- advertisements -
It'll keep rising... bitchez
Fixed it for you! ;-)
Start with Corzine.
Thank you idea hamster.
I thought Obama planned to achieve this by the end of his first term. We should stick to the original metric.
YES WE CAN
can't we? Bitchez?
Most people won't thinks so because they will just keep massaging the numbers to create the headlines they need.
You read about this in the history books and it seemed so foreign, now we're living in an society driven by propaganda! Edward Bernays & Joseph Goebbels would be so proud.
The Ministry of Truth is at it again!
Now down the memory hole with the facts....
We used to make fun of Soviet media:
Don't worry, they will achieve it through real death adjustments.
No problemo - Biden is calling Jon Corizine right now about this issue
Print..hyperinflate. Germany's unemployment rate in the Summer of 1922... anyone know?? it was 1%
Thanks... this graph says everything. IMO, it is the flagship of the 'bullshit cutter' fleet.
im optimistic about future unemployment----------the way i see it, when we get to 0 percent labor force participation, we will have 0% unemployment.
Heh, that's about it for this Regime!
Way to take one for the team.
I know it is fun to see how many jobs it takes to get back to pre-obama levels, but I think Americans need to accept perhaps high employment was actually an anomaly and it is not realistic to expect it to return. A lot of people are not employable. The boom-boom years employed people who didnt have the skills but were a warm body. Today, a warm body doesnt cut it. I dont think that is going to change in the near future.
Just last night I was at a store and couldn't figure out hwo the store clerk was hired. They had no skills. In fact this person working was a detriment. I decided to buy on line. This is not sustainable.
I like the 8.6% unemployment number, all on the back of 316K people giving up looking for work and dropping off of the roles of the unemployed. The other big number is 64% participation rate down 2% in the las few years.
Obama's team has time to adjust the numbers to bring down the unemployment. After that Obama is in for another term. That's how the game works.
...by the end of Obama's potential second term in November 2016.
...by the end of Obama's potential second term in November 2016.
Quite possible. But then it doesn't really matter. For instance, How can Gingrich come into the fray and so easily be more popular than the other contenders so quickly?
Ans: Hes not. Elections are bought and sold. Sock puppet presidents and sock puppet news media.
If only Christmas was every month!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Is that a 2nd derivative decline I spot? Green shoots! /Sarc
US Needs To Generate 263,700 Jobs Monthly To Return To Pre-Depression Employment By End Of Obama Second Term
This is a trick headline.....right? The assumption that Obama will have a second term in which he can miss his target of pre-depression job levels?
I see what you're doing Tyler. You tricky bastard. :)
Obama did say he 'needed a second term to finish the job.'
Funnier if he'd used "Bush's Fourth Term".
"15.8 million jobs"? easy: war.
- Conscription Officer
- Drone Pilot (must have videogame experience)
- Annoying guy with sword in patriotism exploiting ad for Marines
- Xe Operative
- Cash Misplacer
- No-bid contract writer
yeah those USMC ads during the UFCs are the best. As if charging into a life or death war is in ANY way the same as getting into a cage for a professional fight.
The guys I know who were in the USMC in Iraq are now the LEAST gungho of anyone and all think the war was bullshit. Too many doors kicked in and families beaten to stomach the lies anymore.
Some more not-seasonally adjusted numbers from the November 2011 employment situation report.
Since January 2009, Obama's inauguration:
Civilian non-institutionalized population - up 5.702 million
Civilian labor force - up just 238k
Employed - net gain of just 634k
Unemployed - net drop of just 396k
Not in Labor Force - up a dramatic 5.464m
So we've added 5.7 million to our CNIP, but have seen the NILF group rise by nearly the same number.
That's not improvement, and if I have to point that out to you, I guess you're the pointless one.
The important thing is that we must continue to import 120,000 to 150,000 mostly unskilled, Spanish speaking immigrants every month. We need more ethnic diversity. And we need to replace all the aborted democrats that are lovingly killed by their 'progressive' mothers each month. Forget the unemployment rate, the left has a society to mold. Don't like it? There's a FEMA camp waiting for you, cracker.
I agree with not importing unskilled non-English speaking people. We have enough of those already - they're called "white Amerikkans". Have you been to Pittsburgh lately? Or any other part of the Fascist States of Amerikka, for that matter?
As for ethnic diversity, we have enough of that, too. Why, every day I see ghetto garbage and white trash all on the same mode of public transportation.
And, yes - it's a damn shame that all of those poor zygotes never get the opportunity to live a repressed life on Earth. One very well could grow up to be president and take their marching orders from the very same bankers who have controlled all presidents since at least Wilson.
Forget the unemployment rate - the fascist right has a society to mold. Don't like it? There's a FEMA camp waiting for you, cracker!
I can readily admit this comment is just as silly and useless as yours, so there.
public transportation in white cities works. In BRA cities like Atlanta, it's crime-ridden.
Pittsburgh? LOL...voted most livable city in the US. Try again.
Trav7777, I live in Pittsburgh. I work in Pittsburgh. If anybody is uniquely positioned to describe the hell that is Pittsburgh, it would be this Tsar.
Most livable city - by attrition only.
Cheap labor, stupid people, dilapidated infrastructure, poisoned air and water. Yeah - it's a virtual panacea of prosperity here.
man you're smart....if you ever want to hang out and drink let me know...
Right.... and the broader society reflects conservative values... where? Where's the imposition, the molding? They're really shitty at it if they're making any effort at all. The left, on the other hand.... whoa nellie. Control freak central, their control and institutions spreading like ass cancer.
Virtually every conservative I know wants to be left alone and wants to leave others alone. Some want to mold their communities, but the country? You must really miss Jerry Falwell.
Come on stop with the reality posts. The agenda of the financial media is to push the markets to new highs regardless of the facts. If they don't aknowledge the facts and present fantasy as fact to support the agenda all is fine. As Cramer says, he doesn't care about what goes on behind the scenes to get a number, his job is to make your portfolio value go up. If a comapny mistates earnings and the stock doubles, who cares as long as the cheat isn't outed. I AM SICK OF THIS GARBAGE PIT WHERE CHEATING IS NOT ONLY ACCEPTABLE BUT ENCOURAGED AS LONG AS YOU DON'T GET CAUGHT!!!
Don't worry, they'll kill a few million people with a bunch of Al-CIAda nukes... problem solved.
No guarantee they'll get the right ones to fix the labor participation rate, but it'll be fun watching laid-off auto workers attempt to run particle accelerators.
"Obama's second term"....
Are you's really going to vote him in again.???
Have you seen the Pugnican't field?
Are you's really going to vote for Newt or the Pizza Man?
and you will reward this debt driven administration? 5+ Trillion more in debt. Seriously, I'd vote for anyone else. Anyone. I don't care who but I just can't see voting for a total and complete failure. If the next guy fails you thow him out.
Perhaps in less than a decade when the illusion of the American middle class fades in its entirety, the controlling political-corporate oligarchy will decide to "improve" things and reinvigorate the dead American dream, by returning the manufacturing base back to the homeland, since the majority of the population will dream to rise above the "food stamp class", and maybe dream about buying a cheap house in their 50's.
At that time it is guaranteed that the American workforce will work for a proper serf wage (Mexican), and it will make for an attractive investment for the 1%, who are of course (per Fox News) the job creators, and America will be the new Szechwan province and a manufacturer of shoelaces and fighter planes.
Another easy answer: lie
A second term for Obama will be all that is needed to completly distroy America. He needs to get the hell out/.
How about calculating how many jobs Obama Bin Lyin' needs to generate by the end of his one and only term to get employment back to pre depression levels?
Before Employment Can Improve We need 536 more to be unemployed... Every ass hat in Congress plus the Wall Street puppet, teleprompter reading douche bag Nobel "Piece" Prize Laureate and all around useful idiot...
It's worse than it looks.
If you use the slope of the red line from March, 2010 to Sept, 2011 as a guide, it closes on the black line at a rate of 2mn jobs every 5 years.
It's going to take 20 or 25 years, at this pace, to get back to 2007.
The Oct 2011 unemployment rate in Mexico is 4.8%.
We should be talking about what generates positive job growth, for the year over year growth rate in jobs has stalled.
Why do people hire? To pursue profit potential.
What makes them think there is profit potential? Year over year profit growth that is solid and consistent.
And that is something that is lacking. In fact year over year profit growth has slipped from being in the 30% range to less than 7%.
Consequently. we will be talking about negative private sector job growth(job losses for those not in the government propaganda bureau) as soon as summer 2012.
Profit growth leads to job growth. It's the only equation that the politicians refuse to acknowledge.
This chart shows me two things:
1. Job losses under the prior administration were increasing even in the year prior to a Presidential election (when the economy is artificially boosted by incumbants)
2. These job losses stopped only two months after Obama took office and have been replaced by job gains for the past year.
The chart does not tell me why job losses were so great prior to Obama taking office, nor why job growth has been slower than in previous recoveries. But any ZH worth his or her salt knows that answer: excessive FIRE economy debt by both Democrat and Republican adminsitrations created a balance sheet recession that cannot be corrected via traditional fiscal or monetary policy.
The "solution" is a prolonged period of unemployment and underemployment until excess capacity is worked off, the output gap is eliminated and debts are forgiven and/or repaid. In other words, this chart is good news. Why anybody but the unemployed sees massive unemployment as a "problem" escapes me. Do we really want or need a President who uses his office to stimulate more jobs?
Tips: tips [ at ] zerohedge.com
General: info [ at ] zerohedge.com
Legal: legal [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertising: ads [ at ] zerohedge.com
Abuse/Complaints: abuse [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertise With Us
Make sure to read our "How To [Read/Tip Off] Zero Hedge Without Attracting The Interest Of [Human Resources/The Treasury/Black Helicopters]" Guide
How to report offensive comments
Notice on Racial Discrimination.