Wikileaks Discloses The Reason(s) Behind China's Shadow Gold Buying Spree

Tyler Durden's picture

Wondering why gold at $1850 is cheap, or why gold at double that price will also be cheap, or frankly at any price? Because, as the following leaked cable explains, gold is, to China at least, nothing but the opportunity cost of destroying the dollar's reserve status. Putting that into dollar terms is, therefore, impractical at best, and illogical at worst. We have a suspicion that the following cable from the US embassy in China is about to go not viral but very much global, and prompt all those mutual fund managers who are on the golden sidelines to dip a toe in the 24 karat pool. The only thing that matters from China's perspective is that "suppressing the price of gold is very beneficial for the U.S. in maintaining the U.S. dollar's role as the international reserve currency. China's increased gold reserves will thus act as a model and lead other countries towards reserving more gold. Large gold reserves are also beneficial in promoting the internationalization of the RMB." Now, what would happen if mutual and pension funds finally comprehend they are massively underinvested in the one asset which China is without a trace of doubt massively accumulating behind the scenes is nothing short of a worldwide scramble, not so much for paper, but every last ounce of physical gold...

From Wikileaks:



"China increases its gold reserves in order to kill two birds with one stone"


"The China Radio International sponsored newspaper World News Journal (Shijie Xinwenbao)(04/28): "According to China's National Foreign Exchanges Administration China 's gold reserves have recently increased. Currently, the majority of its gold reserves have been located in the U.S. and European countries. The U.S. and Europe have always suppressed the rising price of gold. They intend to weaken gold's function as an international reserve currency. They don't want to see other countries turning to gold reserves instead of the U.S. dollar or Euro. Therefore, suppressing the price of gold is very beneficial for the U.S. in maintaining the U.S. dollar's role as the international reserve currency. China's increased gold reserves will thus act as a model and lead other countries towards reserving more gold. Large gold reserves are also beneficial in promoting the internationalization of the RMB."

Perhaps now is a good time to remind readers what will happen if and when America's always behind the curve mutual and pension fund managers finally comprehend that they are massively underinvested in the one best performing asset class.

From The Driver for Gold You’re Not Watching (via Casey Research)

You already know the basic reasons for owning gold – currency protection, inflation hedge, store of value, calamity insurance – many of which are becoming clichés even in mainstream articles. Throw in the supply and demand imbalance, and you’ve got the basic arguments for why one should hold gold for the foreseeable future.

All of these factors remain very bullish, in spite of gold’s 450% rise over the past 10 years. No, it’s not too late to buy, especially if you don’t own a meaningful amount; and yes, I’m convinced the price is headed much higher, regardless of the corrections we’ll inevitably see. Each of the aforementioned catalysts will force gold’s price higher and higher in the years ahead, especially the currency issues.

But there’s another driver of the price that escapes many gold watchers and certainly the mainstream media. And I’m convinced that once this sleeping giant wakes, it could ignite the gold market like nothing we’ve ever seen.

The fund management industry handles the bulk of the world’s wealth. These institutions include insurance companies, hedge funds, mutual funds, sovereign wealth funds, etc. But the elephant in the room is pension funds. These are institutions that provide retirement income, both public and private.

Global pension assets are estimated to be – drum roll, please – $31.1 trillion. No, that is not a misprint. It is more than twice the size of last year’s GDP in the U.S. ($14.7 trillion).

We know a few hedge fund managers have invested in gold, like John Paulson, David Einhorn, Jean-Marie Eveillard. There are close to twenty mutual funds devoted to gold and precious metals. Lots of gold and silver bugs have been buying.

So, what about pension funds?


According to estimates by Shayne McGuire in his new book, Hard Money; Taking Gold to a Higher Investment Level, the typical pension fund holds about 0.15% of its assets in gold. He estimates another 0.15% is devoted to gold mining stocks, giving us a total of 0.30% – that is, less than one third of one percent of assets committed to the gold sector.

Shayne is head of global research at the Teacher Retirement System of Texas. He bases his estimate on the fact that commodities represent about 3% of the total assets in the average pension fund. And of that 3%, about 5% is devoted to gold. It is, by any account, a negligible portion of a fund’s asset allocation.

Now here’s the fun part. Let’s say fund managers as a group realize that bonds, equities, and real estate have become poor or risky investments and so decide to increase their allocation to the gold market. If they doubled their exposure to gold and gold stocks – which would still represent only 0.6% of their total assets – it would amount to $93.3 billion in new purchases.

How much is that? The assets of GLD total $55.2 billion, so this amount of money is 1.7 times bigger than the largest gold ETF. SLV, the largest silver ETF, has net assets of $9.3 billion, a mere one-tenth of that extra allocation.

The market cap of the entire sector of gold stocks (producers only) is about $234 billion. The gold industry would see a 40% increase in new money to the sector. Its market cap would double if pension institutions allocated just 1.2% of their assets to it.

But what if currency issues spiral out of control? What if bonds wither and die? What if real estate takes ten years to recover? What if inflation becomes a rabid dog like it has every other time in history when governments have diluted their currency to this degree? If these funds allocate just 5% of their assets to gold – which would amount to $1.5 trillion – it would overwhelm the system and rocket prices skyward. 

And let’s not forget that this is only one class of institution. Insurance companies have about $18.7 trillion in assets. Hedge funds manage approximately $1.7 trillion. Sovereign wealth funds control $3.8 trillion. Then there are mutual funds, ETFs, private equity funds, and private wealth funds. Throw in millions of retail investors like you and me and Joe Sixpack and Jiao Sixpack, and we’re looking in the rear view mirror at $100 trillion.

I don’t know if pension funds will devote that much money to this sector or not. What I do know is that sovereign debt risks are far from over, the U.S. dollar and other currencies will lose considerably more value against gold, interest rates will most certainly rise in the years ahead, and inflation is just getting started. These forces are in place and building, and if there’s a paradigm shift in how these managers view gold, look out!

I thought of titling this piece, “Why $5,000 Gold May Be Too Low.” Because once fund managers enter the gold market in mass, this tiny sector will light on fire with blazing speed. 

My advice is to not just hope you can jump in once these drivers hit the gas, but to claim your seat during the relative calm of this month's level prices.

h/t Simon via TF Metals Report

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
DoChenRollingBearing's picture

1/10 th oz (troy, +/- 2.84 grams (?) check my math someone!) US Gold Eagles will be about $200 now.  Maybe a bit more.

pods's picture

1/10th troy is 3.11 g.


DoChenRollingBearing's picture

Thanks. can learn something everyday, even at 55...

sgorem's picture

check out sgorem1949 on Ebay. just sold 4 x 2.5 grams(Pamps) for $700.00. Gonna be more come Monday morning for sure. Buy cheap, sell very high amigos.......

Sgt.Sausage's picture

==> At that price, everybody can at least buy 1 per month.

Come live in my county. Median household income? $23,500. Average number of kids? 2.8. Try to support a wife, three kids, and a trailer and a pick-em-up on Bubba Joe's $1,900 a month (before taxes and expenses) and tell me "everybody" can do it.

There are folks who regularly, y'know, go in the hole deeper and deeper each month. And there are quite a lot of 'em.

snowball777's picture

They're called condoms. Can't afford em? Don't have em!

Rynak's picture

Gold isn't becoming more expensive - you are just becoming poorer and poorer.

N57Mike's picture

can the same be said of a barrel of oil? (it's not getting more expensive, being priced in dollars, and the dollar is getting less valuable)

Rynak's picture

Not exactly, since oil is (at least in theory) strongly affected by supply and demand, because we used it for so many things, and both extraction and abundance is far from static. If anything, oil indeed IS something that will in the longterm only "go up" (unless an alternative for it is found). So, if what you want is making longterm profit, then OIL is the place to be, NOT gold!

With gold on the other hand, the only dynamic aspect about it.... that is, the only things that may affect it's supply and demand, is manipulation, and demand as a currency.

Manipulation can in the longterm only happen up to a certain degree - even with tens of years of price suppression, it reacts to fiat inflation in only one direction, even if perhaps less than it should.

That leaves demand as a currency as the only reason, for its exchange-value raising faster than inflation, or its exchange rate going down.

Phrased another way: Absent changes in using gold as money (or not using it for that), real gold value is static. After all, this is why fiat-proponents have such an interest in keeping gold exchange rate in submission... because a raising gold exchange rate can only mean one single thing: Lack of trust in fiat. Same the other way around (trust in fiat instead of gold). Thus, the exchange rate of gold really measures only one thing: Trust in hard assets vs trust in conceptual promises (i.e. fiat).

Ganja Jane's picture

I don't understand why this is such a hard concept for the American public to grasp.  *sigh*

RafterManFMJ's picture

Who let the Queen of England on here?

Volaille de Bresse's picture

" At least our food isn't made out of plastic"


Well your cheeses and your burgers are...

Tao 4 the Show's picture

A point I make often as well. Call me strange, but I'm not turned on by plastic.

Sudden Debt's picture

I'm not a "into details" kind of guy.

If a woman has a rack that wobbles if she shakes it. I'll take it.

Even if the bumper has been remodeld.