We noted in February:
The U.S. is supporting the Syrian opposition [6] (and see this [7]), considering military options [8] for ousting the Syrian government, American allies Britain and Qatar allegedly already have foreign troops inside Syria, and the U.S. has been planning regime change in Syria for over 50 years [9].
Indeed, the United States is fighting on the same side as 3 terrorist groups [10] in Syria.
Even Pat Buchanan asks [11]:
If its good for Al Qaeda, can it be good for us?
Indeed, terrorist rebels have been responsible [12] for much of the violence inside Syria. And outside monitors have confirmed that the situation on the ground is much different [13] than it is being portrayed in the Western media. (And according to the large German newspaper FAZ, those recently massacred in Hama were on the same side as Syrian leader Assad [14]).
Russia has repeatedly stated [15] that it would consider an attack on Syria as an attack on its national security. (And Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev said that if the U.S. invades the sovereignty of countries like Syria, it could lead to nuclear war [16]. And see this. [17])
Now, Russia is selling attack helicopters [18] to the Syrian government, and defending the sales [19] because the U.S. is supplying rebels with weapons to fight against the government.
Cold War 2.0. And this time, China may participate [20].
Of course, Iran and Syria have had a mutual defense pact [21] for years. So war in Syria could well drag Iran into a hot war.