We knew that the Syrian rebels are mainly Al Qaeda, and that the U.S. has been supporting these terrorists [8] for years.
And we knew that rank-and-file Syrian rebels have:
- And said: “We started our holy war here and won’t finish until this [Al Qaeda] banner will be raised on top of the White House [13]. Keep funding them, you always do that, remember? Al Qaeda for instance.”
But even we were shocked to learn that the head of the Syrian rebels is also the global boss of Al Qaeda ... and that he is calling for fresh terrorist attacks on America.
CBS News reports [14]:
Al Qaeda chief Ayman al-Zawahri called has called on Muslims to continue attacking Americans on their own soil in order to "bleed" the U.S. economy.
***
"To keep up the hemorrhage in America's security and military spending, we need to keep the Unites States on a constant state of alert about where and when the next strike will blow," Zawahiri said.
Reuters noted in February 2012 that al-Zawahri is backing the Syrian rebels, and asking his followers to fight the Syrian government [15].
But al-Zawahri has since taken control of the main Al Qaeda rebel terrorist group in Syria: al-Nusra [16].
Terrorism experts at the Bipartisan Center's [17] Homeland Security Project (co-chaired by 9/11 Chairs Lee Hamilton and Thomas Kean) report [18] (page 24):
A recent illustration of the fractured nature of the al-Qaeda network was provided during the spring of 2013 when Zawahiri [the global head of Al Qaeda] personally intervened to settle a dispute between Jabhat al-Nusra and al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI). Zawahiri rejected AQI’s assertion of control over al-Nusra and declared the Syrian group to be under his direction.
In doing so, Zawahiri was trying to assert control over two of al-Qaeda’s most virulent affiliates. AQI had mounted a series of spectacular attacks in Iraq over the past year, demonstrating that it was a force to be reckoned with. According to the Congressional Research Service, there were some dozen days in 2012 in which AQI carried out simultaneous multicity attacks that killed hundreds of Iraqis. And the al-Qaeda affiliate in Syria is widelyacknowledged as the most effective fighting force in the war against Bashar al-Assad’s regime.
Let's put this in context. Most of the Syrian “rebels” are Al Qaeda [19]. The U.S. government has designated these guys as terrorists [16].
Things are getting better, not worse: Al Qaeda is gaining more and more power [20] among the rebels.
And the U.S., Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Israel have been backing these guys for years [19]. Indeed, we’ve long known that most of the weapons we’re shipping to Syria are ending up in the hands of Al Qaeda [21]. And they apparently have chemical weapons [22].
We're arming the same guys who are threatening to blow us up.
This is even stupider than creating Al Qaeda in the first place to fight the Russians in Afghanistan [23]. At least then, they didn't threaten America while we were arming them.
Hat tip: Paul Joseph Watson [24].