The biggest non-event this weekend will be the upcoming peace crack pipe pow-wow between the world's most demented Keynesians when a bunch of bloated politicians and economists (except for their much smarter Brazilian colleagues who will instead be frolicking on Ipanema beach and enjoying the fruits of the most artificially-enhanced population on earth) sit down in Seoul and pretend they can come to some resolution over the globalized attempt to destroy all world currencies all at the same time as trillions in shadow money disappears each and every quarter. If this feels like a deja vu, it is - every single G-20 meeting in recent history has had an underlying FX focus, the result ends up being some token agreement, and the very next day the sell off in the dollar continues, as 20 other banks proceed to buy dollars in an act of futility against Ben Bernanke's death star fiat printer. In other words nothing will change. Even JPMorgan agrees: "On Saturday the G-20 may deliver their first statement on FX, and they may incorporate language which many countries have never collectively endorsed, but such a statement may not change much in practice. The status quo, whereby countries manage a dollar decline as best fits their circumstances as long as they don't deliberately strengthen the dollar, will probably persist for lack of a better option...The euro too would fall initially, since less intervention implies less reserve recycling. It would later rally as the dollar broadly declined." In other words - US middle class, a hotdog in Europe will soon cost about as much as it does in Disney Land.
It has just not been Maverick Capital's quarter. From a just released 8K: "Today, Apollo Group, Inc. announced that its subsidiary, The University of Phoenix, Inc. (“University of Phoenix”), has received notice that the State of Florida Office of the Attorney General in Fort Lauderdale, Florida has commenced an investigation into possible unfair and deceptive trade practices associated with certain alleged practices of University of Phoenix. The notice includes a subpoena to produce documents and detailed information for the time period of January 1, 2006 to the present about a broad spectrum of University of Phoenix’s business."
Now that everyone knows that the only real macro trade is frontrunning Brian Sack, and fundamental analysis and its various derivatives are as dead as the dodo, there is one more trade that is a sure way for investors to make money: piggyback on short squeezes, especially with the assistance of State Street and the likes, whose only job it appears is to make increasingly more stocks impossible to borrow and forcing outright buyins in more and more names (more on that shortly). As shorts across all sectors have been trampled by endless rounds of liquidity, without regard for logic or bubble valuations, the desire of the bears to press a market that is now pricing in about $3.5 trillion in risk asset support (courtesy of QE 1, Lite and 2) or about 30% of the total market cap, isolating the names that have the highest Short Interest/Float and jumping on board may be the one profitable trade in addition to selling various CUSIPs to the Fed's gaping black hole. So what names should one invest in (and we use that in the most derogatory sense imaginable)? Luckily, Morgan Stanley has updated their most shorted names presentation. Keep in mind that these names are massively shorted for a reason: they are all mostly bubbles and deserve to trade orders of magnitude lower. But such is the reality of a market bubble - there is no reality. It is all just hype and "story" themes, not grounded in fact whatsoever. But that does not matter. It is all about the Fed. So without further ado, here are the names that will likely see the most indiscriminate offer lifting as more and more shorts are pulverized by Brian and his henchmen.
POMO is over, and with great regret we inform readers that the Fed now has zero credibility as the trades we expected to be precisely those most frontrun by the market are exactly as predicted. In other words: the CUSIPs anticipated to be monetized, and which we advised readers to lever up, buy, and flip them back to the Fed within a day, were precisely the ones that were put back. Fundamental analysis - you are fired. Enter - 100% Fed Frontrunning success rate.
In the latest amusing discrepancy to come out of the BLS, today's reported unemployment data by state indicated that at the end of September, there was a total of 129,699,600 people employed across the various states. Not very surprisingly, the biggest deterioration occurred in California which lost 63.5 K jobs, followed by New York at 37.6K (Wall Street layoffs?) and Massachusetts at 20.9K. The total change from August's 129,923,400 employed was a drop of 223,800. Well, this is a little confusing as the NFP number for September indicated that total jobs lost were 95,000, a slightly more than 50% improvement compared to the job losses at the state level. As Zero Hedge has demonstrated, the data coming out of the BLS is statistically impossible to say the least, and at best, worthless. But now at least we are getting confirmation that just like in the Fed, there may be those within the BLS, who actually know how to count. Too bad, those are not the people in charge of actual propaganda dissemination.
Today's POMO, focusing on 2013-2014 bonds has just started. As we proposed yesterday (in what led to quite a lively and interesting debate), now that even Goldman is advising clients to frontrun POMO, this may have been the top tick to the POMO frontrunning operation. A red close may just confirm that. But far more important than equities, we highlighted, courtesy of MS, just which CUSIPs will most likely be monetized (and thus submitted) the most by the Fed today. If indeed these are confirmed to be the bonds put to the Fed the most, it will merely erode one more layer of credibility the Fed has of an impartial and non-transparent organization.
Who says Canadians lack a sense of humor... And are ever wrong about the ECRI.
Goldman Sachs: At 7% Above The 55-DMA, The Market Has Been More Overstretched Just Once In History, And Other MispricingsSubmitted by Tyler Durden on 10/22/2010 - 08:39
John Noyce, Goldman's arguably best technician, in his weekly Charts that Matter, has released one (among many) interesting observation on just how overbought the market currently is, and more specifically just how desperate the velocity of the pick up in the stocks since August has been, in order for levered beta players such as hedge funds, as we predicted in the end of August, to make up as much of their year as possible before seeing redemptions (even so many will not survive into 2010 as the entire 2/20 model is now crumbling). Specifically, by looking at where the S&P is relative to its 55 DMA, Noyce notes that every time the market has gotten to above 5% its trailing average, it has always entered a period of consolidation (read at least modest selling). Furthermore, compared to the recent trend extreme of 7% above 55 DMA, the market moved meaningfully above one just one occasion in the past: in January 2009... just before the crash to the decade lows of 666 on the S&P occurred.
The Pentagon is not too happy this morning. As the AP reports, WikiLeaks is about to release what the Pentagon fears is the largest cache of secret U.S. documents in history — hundreds of thousands of intelligence reports compiled after the 2003 invasion of Iraq. While WikiLeaks has not commented on the imminent announcement, it tweeted earlier that there is "major WikiLeaks press conference in Europe coming up." And as this disclosure would be the "most massive leak of secret documents in U.S. history" defense officials are racing to contain the damage. As a reminder WikiLeaks' last release of Adghanistan war logs made founder Julian Assange some of a persona non grata in most of the developed world. Of course, the buzz about who may be behind Wikileaks still seems to circulate every now and then. Additionally, Wiki advised interested parties who wish to book the announcement in advance to email the following address, firstname.lastname@example.org, which however appears to be a broken one. Of course, it merely adds to the "mystery." Regardless, we will follow this and present wiki's findings as they become available.
In the wake of the sovereign debt crisis, Europe has chosen to respond with measures of austerity as various euro-zone countries pledge to cut spending dramatically in order to bring their respective budget deficits down to a few percentage points of GDP apiece. These measures also come in the much bigger wake of the credit crisis of 2008. Even more severe is the United Kingdom’s recently revealed plan to cut £81 billion or a sum equivalent to 4.5% of projected GDP and characterized by the FT as “the most drastic budget cuts in living memory, outstripping measures taken by other advanced economies which are also under pressure to sharply reduce spending.” In fact, the UK’s public sector will lose 500,000 jobs as a result of these cuts. The United States, on the other hand, is favoring stimulus to austerity by maintaining near-zero rates and planning another round of quantitative easing or the buying of longer-term Treasury securities to flood the system with liquidity. The exact amount and timing of QE2 is unknown, but it comes on top of the $1.7 trillion pushed into the system by the Fed starting in 2009.
- The real stock rally killer: Analysis: Bush tax cuts might just expire after all (Reuters)
- Bondholder `Immunity' to Losses Challenged as Irish Bail Banks (Bloomberg)
- Fed's Hoenig: Further Easing Poses Risk To Nascent US Recovery (WSJ)
- Fed's Bullard Favors Open-Ended Bond Purchases (MarketWatch)
- Ohio AG: foreclosure probe won't stop post-election (Reuters)
- False expectations: The historic infrastructure investment that wasn’t (Economist)
- Democrats slam another campaign opponent: China (Reuters)
- Asian stocks rise as US earnings, Jobless claims boost growth optimism.
- California plans to sell $10B of notes in mid-November to pay bills.
- Fed's Bullard proposed the central bank buy $100B in long-term Treasuries in Nov.
- German two-year government note yield rises to 1%, first time since April.
- Gold set for first weekly decline in six as Dollar's strength cuts appeal.
- Hoenig says US economy is in recovery and 'growing modestly'.
- AIG said to raise $17.8B as AIA unit completes record Hong Kong IPO.
RANsquawk European Morning Briefing - Stocks, Bonds, FX etc. – 22/10/10
The biggest story today for video rental/video streaming company Netflix was not its parabolic move higher on earnings that left many scratching their heads, but that the company's exposure of just how vulnerable, and potentially unprepared, to growing pains it is, after its website suffered a multi-hour outage preventing clients (both paying and free) from accessing any streaming movies. And the company, which is betting if not the ranch, the definitely its cash flow on the transition to streaming (in Q3 it spent $115 million on video streaming rights, an 11-fold increase from the same time last year) may very well be unprepared for the priced in exponential growth in new users (even more so since as we pointed out earlier, the bulk of the expansion is to non-paying customers). The reason, as AP pointed out earlier, is that Netflix's streaming service has become so popular that it is now the
largest source of U.S. Internet traffic during peak evening hours. Streaming
by Netflix subscribers accounted for about one-fifth of that peak-time
traffic, more than double the volume flowing from Google Inc.'s YouTube. And this massive infrastructure is supported by... $120 million in PP&E!? Indicatively Google is almost $5 billion. And since the market is expecting continued parabolic growth to its existing customer base of 15.9 million paid users to validate the new business model to which it attributes a lofty 30x+ PE of 2012 Earnings (a deja vu of the dot com days of "story stocks"), the company will soon have no choice but to actually expand its seemingly underfunded infrastructure, which it currently carries at $125 million on its books. Unless, of course, it wants to lose exasperated clients with an ultra short attention span who demand instant gratification and who can easily find substitute streaming providers in these days of Hulu (which itself is about to IPO), and numerous cable channel hosted alternatives. The big problem is that with $8 million of non GAAP free cash flow as disclosed in its Q3 earning release, there is no way this expansion can be funded organically. Furthermore, as the company is currently below its self-disclosed cash floor level, is the only option for Netflix to come out with a follow on offering, and fast? What that would do to a stock that has under $200 million in book equity and almost $9 billion in market cap we leave to our readers' imagination.
To Whom It May Concern,
I have a question. Why does the SEC allow high frequency traders/co-location traders/etc., to front run retail orders every day in almost every security? When I say front run, I mean the practice of utilizing sub-penny orders whereby these so called traders step in front of real bids and offers by 1/100th of a penny to get the trade done, knowing there's a bid or offer right behind them. This has happened to me at least fifty times in the last year. It is particularly a problem on illiquid issues in which the sub-penny order that front runs my orders may be the only business done at that level. And so my order just sits there and never gets filled.