This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

BAC Share Price November 2010: $32.00





 
 

- advertisements -

Mon, 02/07/2011 - 19:55 | 941837 oppium
oppium's picture

Thanks for admin.nice sharing.very nice..
Makina Makine Makine Torna Torna Makina Parçalar? Makina Parçalar? cnc torna cnc torna cnc freze cnc freze sohbet Sohbet Chat Chat Muhabbet Muhabbet

Mon, 01/24/2011 - 04:10 | 898239 co2010
co2010's picture

The Air Jordan 2011 are the option of basketball players circle the world and for this purpose, your corporation, Nike is now set one of the maximum presidents in the field of shoe from the ball better.Here comes a fresh color of the Air Jordan 1 Phat Low on which I privately was very joyous for moderately several time. The Olympic colorway of the deep-cut and well-padded Air Jordan 1 has a black nubuck surface, which is blended with a slightly shiny swoosh in crocodile leather effect. They are eye-catching and of course the purpose that the fresh Air Jordan New Arrivals  Phat Low even paged Olympia but undoubtedly the colored seams.  http://airjordanshoesol.com/

Wed, 01/13/2010 - 12:47 | 192448 ATG
ATG's picture

Mr Paulson may prove how fleeting

financial fame can be if both BAC and Gold

take a dive...

http://www.jubileeprosperity.com/

Mon, 11/23/2009 - 00:22 | 139040 Natural
Natural's picture

Based on the fact that 85% of you have voted that it will be under I am saying that chances are it will in fact be over 30.

Sun, 11/22/2009 - 22:54 | 138944 10044
10044's picture

it could very well be 32, heck it could be 62. does that mean victory? NO, it means it has CRASHED. YES, you heard me right, 32 , 42, 62, who cares when usdx will be at 50 or lower?

in fact, I think 'nominal' numbers will go up, exactly because dollar will go down (just ask Shalom Bernanke how that's possible).

so, remember, we could have a crash 'on the upside'. Dow could go up to 20k, 30k who knows, exactly because no one knows how much Shalom will print. but by that time Gold will have gone to Pluto and a loaf of bread will be $20.

Sun, 11/22/2009 - 22:50 | 138934 bullchit
bullchit's picture

$32.50. That's for the whole index, right?

Regards.

Sun, 11/22/2009 - 19:26 | 138851 Ben Graham Redux
Ben Graham Redux's picture

BankAmerica can't even entice someone to run the place.  If this thing is such an attractive investment, why can't they find a CEO?  Hell, if a potential CEO thought there was value, he'd get in there today, get his options price at $16 and make a fortune in a year.  I'm not buying it.

Mon, 11/23/2009 - 00:55 | 139063 omi
omi's picture

They should get a janitor to run it.

 

Reminds me of a movie with a similar plot. The board at a large toy company decide to buy more company shares. They realize that the price of their stock is relatively well priced, so they needed to create a panic. They hire some yong guy to run the company who had the idea of producing hula hoops. No one buys, them - stock plummets. Board loads up on stock... funny movie actually.

 

Point being, they should hire an intern who never worked at a bank to be CEO. Unfortunately, he'll do a decent job of running a bank.

 

Sun, 11/22/2009 - 12:53 | 138693 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

The game is rigged. If he said it's going to be 132 by next Wednesday then that's what it'll be. Why do you guys hold on to the rules of free markets? This isn't even about money any more. It's about power.

Pile in, make a double.

Sun, 11/22/2009 - 16:22 | 138793 spekulatn
spekulatn's picture

Unfortunately true,me thinks, #138693.

Damn shame really.

F*** it.

Sun, 11/22/2009 - 11:44 | 138672 Ben Graham Redux
Ben Graham Redux's picture

John Paulson seems to have gotten a taste for the limelight.  I wonder if his celebrity is tainting his objectivity?  They guy who believes he has the Midas touch is the guy who is in line to shit the bed.  He may have faith in the Fed but I don't considering how this is the same Fed that gave us the dislocation of 2008.

Sun, 11/22/2009 - 10:45 | 138657 bugs_
bugs_'s picture

Fool For The Citi - apologies to Foghat!

Goin' to the citi, got you on my mind,
Countrywide is pretty, I'll leave it all behind,
This is my decision, I'm comin' home to stay this time.
'Cause I'm a fewl for the citi, I'm a fewl for the citi,
Fewl for the citi, I'm a fewl for the citi.
Breathin' all the clean air, sittin' in the sun,
When I get my train fare, I'll get up and run.
I'm ready for the citi, air pollution here I come!
'Cause I'm a fewl for the citi, I'm a fewl for the citi,
I'm a fewl for the citi, I'm a fewl for the citi.
I'm like a fish out of water, I'M JUST A MAN IN A HOLE.
The citi lights turn my blues into GOLD.
I ain't no countrywide, I'm just a homesick man.
I'm gonna hit the bid just as fast as I can.
I'm tired of layin' back, hangin' around,
I'm gonna catch that train, then I'll be CITIBOUND!!!!!

Sun, 11/22/2009 - 03:26 | 138597 jdrose1985
jdrose1985's picture

i voted under and then immediately kicked myself in the ass for not voting over, I hear that mummies can sell for a lot of money, especially those which are contained in protective glass cases.

 

Or thrown under a TARP.

Sun, 11/22/2009 - 04:17 | 138610 overbet
overbet's picture

If this poll was on AIG 6 months ago it would be even more than this. Prolly upward of 95%  for the under

Sun, 11/22/2009 - 16:10 | 138788 spekulatn
spekulatn's picture

Exactly why I voted over. 

I'm often wrong, but always in doubt.

Sun, 11/22/2009 - 02:21 | 138586 overbet
overbet's picture

I voted under but looks like Morgan Stanley agrees with Paulson. 

http://www.scribd.com/doc/20755324/Best-Ideas-ms

Sun, 11/22/2009 - 01:35 | 138578 Printfaster
Printfaster's picture

OK, which Paulson is it?  Hank or John?

Big difference.

Besides, this is cannot be answered on the fundamentals.  It is about how much will the Fed print to save them?  What you really need to do ask what will be:

BAC * DXY

That has at least some meaning.

Sun, 11/22/2009 - 00:51 | 138564 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

32 cents maybe. He sold Goldman and bought BAC. Muuch as I despise Goldman that was a stupid trade.

Sun, 11/22/2009 - 00:06 | 138548 Rick Blaine
Rick Blaine's picture

Everything you guys are talking about is way over my head...

I just went for the "Paulson Incorrect" label.

Sat, 11/21/2009 - 23:31 | 138527 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

What was the reason for him selling BAC if it was going to double? Shouldn't he have bought more?

Sat, 11/21/2009 - 23:21 | 138524 TomB
TomB's picture

Real or nominal?

Sat, 11/21/2009 - 23:47 | 138534 Papasmurf
Papasmurf's picture

If you hold a lot of gold and gold miners, BAC would be a hedge.  That may be the reason Paulson is in.

Sun, 11/22/2009 - 15:02 | 138746 gmrpeabody
gmrpeabody's picture

+1

Sat, 11/21/2009 - 21:41 | 138472 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

If mark to market reinstated then Paulson is wrong else he is right. By this time next year BAC would have sold of a lot of assets and will become a smaller bank. It will survive just because its name is Bank of "America".

Sat, 11/21/2009 - 23:24 | 138525 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

With that name, you KNOW it's owned by foreigners.

Sat, 11/21/2009 - 21:06 | 138458 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Yeah, Paulson just dumped millions of shares per last filing yet he still thinks it will double? Laughable

BAC still has to raise loads of capital to deal with 10-12% jobless rates in perpetuity

Sun, 11/22/2009 - 11:46 | 138673 deadhead
deadhead's picture

Yeah, Paulson just dumped millions of shares per last filing yet he still thinks it will double?

He dumped approx 8 million shares last quarter but he still owns somewhere around 150-160 million as I recall from the ZH summary presented recently.

 

 

Sun, 11/22/2009 - 06:55 | 138621 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

The "jobless" rate is about 50%. Only half the people in this country work.

The rest? I don't know exactly what they do it's a hodgepodge of the rest, made up of students, social security recips, the ill, private pensioners, other retirees like railroad employees, government workers, teachers, the independently wealthy,trustfunders,the underground economy that will thrive no matter what...

When thinking of unemployment, it needs to be thought about in context of a country in which one half of 350,000,000 of
us do not work at any one time.

That's an awful lot of unemployed that this country seems to absorb without batting an eye. What's another few percent on top of that, on a Macroeconomic level?

Nada.

Mon, 11/23/2009 - 00:50 | 139059 omi
omi's picture

Yes, I'm with you brother!

I always had a hard on for child labour, so I think we should step it one up - baby labour!

I'm sure babies can be useful for perpetual crawling in a circle or something to generate electricity. By the time they are 5, they can be better athletes.

Mon, 11/23/2009 - 01:23 | 139078 Hephasteus
Sat, 11/21/2009 - 20:52 | 138447 nonclaim
nonclaim's picture

Over $32 nominaly, under $16 (BAC last close) in purchase power today (nominal inflation; real deflation).

Sat, 11/21/2009 - 20:59 | 138440 AN0NYM0US
AN0NYM0US's picture

voting 'over',  as $32 may not be sufficient to purchase a Happy Meal® by end of 2010

Sat, 11/21/2009 - 20:41 | 138439 geopol
geopol's picture

Last trade $16.09

With hyperinflation Nov 2010 $367,908,700,984,457,687,656,578.00 or BK

Sat, 11/21/2009 - 20:08 | 138424 Sancho Ponzi
Sancho Ponzi's picture

How about a poll on whether BAC share price will be greater or less than the cost of a gallon of milk?

Sun, 11/22/2009 - 10:35 | 138655 Bam_Man
Bam_Man's picture

Exactly.

BAC could very well be $32 a share in a years time.

BAC at $32 =

Gas at $9/gallon

Bread at $12/loaf

Milk at $13/gallon

$DXY at 52

Gold at $2650/oz

Unemployment (U6) at 35%

US under martial law with 8pm curfew

 

Even if you own BAC, you better hope it doesn't happen.

 

Sun, 11/22/2009 - 15:44 | 138770 hidingfromhelis
hidingfromhelis's picture

You said what I was thinking, and with more details.

Sun, 11/22/2009 - 15:00 | 138745 gmrpeabody
gmrpeabody's picture

+1

Sat, 11/21/2009 - 20:07 | 138423 ratava
ratava's picture

'$' in Nov 10, lol u made my day

Sat, 11/21/2009 - 19:41 | 138404 Cap
Cap's picture

Maybe after a stock split ...

Sat, 11/21/2009 - 19:37 | 138399 Failure to Comm...
Failure to Communicate's picture

They are not done pumping this fecal matter...

Sat, 11/21/2009 - 19:28 | 138393 A Man without Q...
A Man without Qualities's picture

How about the question of how many shares of BAC could you buy with an ounce of gold in Nov 2010.  

I'd suggest over or under 100....

 

Sat, 11/21/2009 - 22:26 | 138490 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Who in the world would waste gold on BAC shares?

Sat, 11/21/2009 - 19:06 | 138383 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

I just guessed 'under'... and I was right!

Sat, 11/21/2009 - 18:50 | 138373 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Though I voted under, I realized, maybe they'll has a 10:1 reverse split by then, that's the only way it will be over $32 (really $3.2, but that's a minor detail isn't it?)

Sun, 11/22/2009 - 13:25 | 138701 Jewelsnorth
Jewelsnorth's picture

I think you might've hit the nail on the head.

Sat, 11/21/2009 - 18:56 | 138372 delacroix
delacroix's picture

they used to say , you can't polish a horse turd.  that sure hasn't stopped the banks from trying. forget merril, countrywide was enough to BK  b of  a

Sat, 11/21/2009 - 18:44 | 138368 digalert
digalert's picture

wasn't it here on ZH I read the reference,

BofA "TARP bank for life"

Sat, 11/21/2009 - 18:35 | 138365 deadhead
deadhead's picture

Typo in headline.  Should be $3.20.

 

 

Sun, 11/22/2009 - 14:40 | 138738 Stink_Pickle
Stink_Pickle's picture

in 2009 dollar terms, then I'd have to agree...

Sun, 11/22/2009 - 00:06 | 138547 the phantom
the phantom's picture

LOL   +1

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!