This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Geographical Area: United States. Time Frame: Next 18 Months.





 
 

- advertisements -

Wed, 05/26/2010 - 22:22 | 376075 ChoirBoy
ChoirBoy's picture

The money will be everywhere- except in the pockets of the  "working class."  So we are in for an inflationary depression, better load up on lawyers, guns and hard money.

Fri, 10/02/2009 - 18:09 | 87086 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Neither will happen.

Everything will continue on as it is. Little will change.

Everything will be fine.

No currency crisis.

Government will provide another stimulus, and issue $10,000 checks to every American citizen.

People will go buy big screen TVs.

Dow hits 20,000.

Nothing to see here, nothing to see here.

Wed, 09/30/2009 - 08:22 | 83526 themarketwizard
themarketwizard's picture

This poll seems like a good contrarian indicator to me

Mon, 09/28/2009 - 13:58 | 81592 Slewburger
Slewburger's picture

Inflation. In relative terms ($) goods will go up.

Deflation. In absolute terms (Au, Ag) goods will go down.

 

Edit: I voted inflation.

We have expanded the US $ supply without a corresponding rise in production.

Sun, 10/11/2009 - 02:18 | 95711 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

+1

Sun, 09/13/2009 - 20:50 | 68375 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

I voted inflation. Why? Because I never hear our creditors panicking over deflation. China would not be freaking out over Bernanke's keystrokes if massive deflation was coming.

Then again I would more precisely pick stagflation as where we will be in 18 months.

Sun, 09/13/2009 - 18:30 | 68304 Thoreau
Thoreau's picture

inflation of the essentials; deflation of everything else.

Sun, 09/13/2009 - 14:07 | 68195 joebren
joebren's picture

Is this a contrary indicator?

Sun, 09/13/2009 - 17:10 | 68273 etrader
etrader's picture

What happens if we go down the debt "reconciliation" route?

Once the debt is on fully on the Governments Books debt reconciliation between sovereign nations can start to take place as  happend with some third world debt countries?

Sun, 09/13/2009 - 13:07 | 68175 Manfred
Manfred's picture

a good post on the inf/def debate by Mole

over at

http://evilspeculator.com/?p=10801

 

(a bit of a circular posting as he in turn quotes Zero Hedge)

Sun, 09/13/2009 - 15:55 | 68239 Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

Very good he's graphed inflation with less than great depression crash amounts of m3 velocity. Which means if money so much as twitches inflation will explode.

Sun, 09/13/2009 - 10:42 | 68123 bugs_
bugs_'s picture

virtual dollars vs. physical dollars.  i think virtual dollars

inflate - people will not want them.  physical dollars deflate -

people have been hoarding them and will continue.

Sun, 09/13/2009 - 12:48 | 68169 chumbawamba
chumbawamba's picture

If phyiscal dollars are not wanted then they will INFLATE.  I.E. the velocity will increase dramatically and more of the physical currency will be required to pay for the same stuff.

Inflation/deflation are difficult concepts to understand for most people because they actually represent the opposite of what the words imply.

Just think of it in terms of supply and demand:

High supply of dollars + demand for dollars drop = INFLATION
Low supply of dollars + demand for dollars rises = DEFLATION

I am Chumbawamba.

Sun, 09/13/2009 - 00:52 | 68031 rapier
rapier's picture

There will be flation. Some in and some de. Most delightfully incomes will deflate for most. The transaction economy will deflate which is great for the financial economy which will continue to inflate as central banks around the world will continue to pour money into the financial economy using the excuse that such will inflate the transaction economy. An extravagant lie which would embarass even PT Barnum.

So baring an asteroid strike or cadres of Teabaggers going postal I'm thinking that assorted financial assets are possibly going to have some stuependous inflationary runs.

Sun, 09/13/2009 - 09:54 | 68104 DaLev
DaLev's picture

have you considered the pension/union time bomb?

state budgets severly underwater, and not just CA, look at NY and NJ

teachers, policemen, etc are making $80-120k a year with union protection against firing, +3% p.a. raises and the best medical benefits you can find...

 

THEN ON TOP....PENSIONS!!! at as high as 70% of your last year's pay....throw in overtime during that last year and retirement entitlement pay can be easily in excess of $100k a year.....plus 403Bs, etc...

who pays for all this, YOU DO, via increased property taxes etc...

 

but, does your company still provide a pension plan? probably not

do you get a 3% p.a. raise, each and every year? probably not

do you have job security? probably not

are your entitlement costs passed on to everyone else in the community? heck no

 

unions are bankrupting our nation

 

the public sector entitlements are insane

 

these benefits needs to deflate.....like everyone else's salary

 

and the driver in this FLATION debate will be driven by the aggragate value of salaries.....

 

thanks for letting me vent

Sun, 09/13/2009 - 09:59 | 68107 asdf
asdf's picture

if the public sector is so great, why don't you just work for it?

Sun, 09/13/2009 - 10:08 | 68111 DaLev
DaLev's picture

i am considering it, but i wont fall into the basket of the 10's of millions or so who have accumulated this massive windfall and entitlements...it take time, and i dont have time anymore

who will pay my mortage when i go back to school?

if i was 20, or 30, heck yes (not cause the benefits will remain, but because there might not be a better option in the private sector.....things are bad)

what i am saying are these public sector entitlements are a big economic burden and their correction might just be self full filling in a few years as each state fails to balance their budgets...entitlements will be cut....but cut way to late and not for the existing people raping the system....

i considered (recently) quiting and getting an RN degree, gotta be a good need for that???

Sun, 09/13/2009 - 12:37 | 68165 MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

Anecdotal, but nurses are telling me the field is saturated right now, hours are being cut, patients are putting off more elective type surgeries, etc. It is hard to know what to do! Nothing is safe.

Sat, 09/12/2009 - 23:04 | 67995 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Is it just me, or have the numbers been lock-step 71%/29% all day. I have to question whether the table is working properly.

Sun, 09/13/2009 - 00:44 | 68029 cbxer55
cbxer55's picture

It would seem the percentages are off as compared to the total number of votes.

I've checked it twice in the last ten minutes, and you are right, the total number of votes changes, but the percentage does not change.

It seems off by about 1% currently, but will change real soon.

Good catch!

Sat, 09/12/2009 - 23:02 | 67993 kote
kote's picture

Did every single commenter miss the point of this post?  I stopped reading after page one.  Guys: GEOGRAPHIC AREA.

Poll is asking if the US is going to grow geographically of if we're selling Hawaii to the chinese.

Sat, 09/12/2009 - 23:07 | 67996 MinnesotaNice
MinnesotaNice's picture

Kote... imho... the rest of the commenter's did get the point... TD has indicated that the geographical area pertinent to the question is the United States (as opposed to Mexico or Russia)... and the question is whether there will be inflationary or deflationary pressures in that geographical area... not if the physical size of the geographical area will change.  But we can agree to disagree  :-)

Sat, 09/12/2009 - 19:45 | 67914 MinnesotaNice
MinnesotaNice's picture

I find it absolutely fascinating that we are two years into this recession and the outcome of inflation or deflation cannot be predicted by any reliable measures... which tells me that the question that should be asked is how far along in this fiasco are we really at this point?

Additionally, I am in both the inflation and deflation camp...

  • Inflation on must-have items which are a defined part of a household budget... which will only cause households to feel the impact more acutely especially if wages and jobs continue to erode. 

 

  • Deflation on the items which are not must-have items and are financed by credit... people won't want them or can't acquire them because of lack of funds or credit... so demand will go down... and hence deflation will reign in these areas.
Sat, 09/12/2009 - 20:04 | 67923 MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

Hi MinnieNice!

One thing I notice in all this, no one thinks about resource depletion when they discuss their positions on these issues. If demand for "stuff" is down, fossil fuel consumption will drop and so will the price. When the price drops, there will not be enough money coming in for new discovery and R&D. Granted, we may have more of a cushion than 18 months on this, but I wonder. Some of the biggest sources of oil, for instance, are seeing annual production drop off a cliff.

There are food security issues like the fuel issue to consider.

These do seem to play into a deflation now, inflation later scenario.

But let's not fool ourselves. Wild card. Currency crisis could happen any second. If enough people see it the way we on this board see it, the dollar goes bye-bye. Me, got PMs and cash and I walk on eggshells, trolling boards like this one, hoping I can see the bad moon on the rise and that I can jump the right way in time.

Sat, 09/12/2009 - 22:34 | 67981 Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

Good points. You also get crisis shortages. I mean think about it. Hard drives, video cards, laptops they are all intereconnected made on global scale with multipart tiered interlocked productions. One arm of those could get in trouble and skyrocket prices in the other arms. Same thing with farming, Textiles etc.

I mean what do you think is going to happen to clothing prices after the retail stores are devestated?

America makes no shoes, bluejeans have moved offshore, etc etc. Steel industry has shut down with so many dynamic crisis operating at the same time any industry could go from inventory glutted no margins to no supply at any time. You'll have monopolistic minded companies running around trying to gobble up or destroy competition pushing for unfair advantages on the government presenting the competition as unnecesary and a write off. We've lived in a crazy world where steel was shipped at high speed wasting fuel from china to canada to make parts to send to europe.

Sat, 09/12/2009 - 20:37 | 67933 MinnesotaNice
MinnesotaNice's picture

Hi MsCreant,

Good points... there are so many dynamics in this entire situation that the 'butterfly effect' really limits the predictive models. 

By the way if you see even a sliver of that bad moon give me a heads up... because I also diligently put my ear to the ground listening for the rumble of a coming approach... and check multiple times a day for small signs of a potential arrival. 

 

Sat, 09/12/2009 - 19:27 | 67908 DaLev
DaLev's picture

well, let's see.

needs (health, food, shelter, clothing)

wants (electronics,big houses,luxury cars,vacations,toys)

so, i say needs inflate if population increases, and globally it is

but wants shall deflate

 

then you got to balance them....

 

needs ie population growth 1-3%??

wants...well, remove easy credit, instill fear of job loss, increase savings, and the impact of the increase in costs of "needs"....well. wants will deflate by (in my opinion) far more than the needs

 

so net deflation....

 

Sat, 09/12/2009 - 19:20 | 67905 madmax
madmax's picture

Next 18 months--DEFLATION!!!

Sat, 09/12/2009 - 18:39 | 67889 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

I guessed inflation, because at some point, the trend will reverse and I think it could happen within 18 months. Also I am somewhat personally positioned for inflation. But I certainly wouldn't rule out a situation like Japan.

I mainly commented to write about political viability. Inflation helps: those with fixed-rate debt; workers, generally, and especially those with fixed-rate debt; those paying fixed annuities (such as pension funds). Deflation helps: savers (such as holders of bonds); those receiving fixed annuities (such as fixed pensions); those who made loans (assuming they are paid back).

Sat, 09/12/2009 - 18:34 | 67886 Butt Pirate
Butt Pirate's picture

Inflation hurts banks as well as debts paid back are paid with cheaper dollars. You could pay your house off with one paycheck. Yes, I know that a loaf of bread will be $500, but banks will be hurt by inflation as well as deflation. 

   Considering that inflation is a rise in the money supply, we have already laid the groundwork.

Sat, 09/12/2009 - 19:05 | 67901 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Prices stay the same.

Package of grocery shrink so you must buy two.

= Inflation

Mon, 09/14/2009 - 04:57 | 68531 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

That's price inflation, not monetary inflation.

Sat, 09/12/2009 - 17:09 | 67851 Masked Man
Masked Man's picture

The answer is "both" or "it depends". Follow where the increased money supply is flowing and there you will find the inflation. Look at the stock market and the oil market for example. You can have inflation and deflation going on at the same time and affecting the same asset. Housing is a great example. We have house price deflation in most areas of the country but the funny money given out by the government ($8000) is inflating the deflating prices. The net result may be deflation, but technically there is inflation at work as well.

Sat, 09/12/2009 - 16:50 | 67842 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Deflation. I see the US dollar strengthening over the next decade as the world realizes that the Yen is overvalued as the capacity of Japan to pay off its debt declines (declining population leads to declining GDP leads to higher debt to GDP ratio). Also the Euro experiment could collapse as socialist politicians from Spain, Greece, Italy, and etc.will look to regain control of their own currency leading to new currencies pegged to the US dollar. Once the dollar gets very strong, the Fed will really start the printing press in order to pay off all external debt owned by China and the middle East. With a strengthening US dollar investments and new immigrants will flow to the US, increasing RE prices and leading to a new and stable economic expansion in North America. The US and Goldman always win...That is my answer to all the dollar haters

Sun, 09/13/2009 - 12:38 | 68166 chumbawamba
chumbawamba's picture

A thesis so interesting that it leaves the mind repelled.  Just how does the dollar "get very strong" again?  Magic?  A backing of gold?  A return of manufacturing to the United States?

I am Chumbawamba.

Sat, 09/12/2009 - 16:41 | 67838 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Let's ask Mish about that. I can hardly wait to buy 5-6 houses for $20.(for all of them) So the $ like every other fiat currency, will die becouse in this particular case will become too strong? Wow!

Sat, 09/12/2009 - 15:35 | 67808 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Anyone who thinks we're heading for inflation in the next 18 months is living on another planet.

Also, specifically, why is deflation so bad for an economy?

Sun, 09/13/2009 - 08:47 | 68090 Basque
Basque's picture
Outstanding debt is supported, in the balance sheets of banks, by assets that serve as collateral (Think of a house, for example). Deflation is a contraction of money supply. This contraction reduces the ability to bid in cash for assets and asset prices collapse. The consequence is masive debt default and the destruction of bank balance sheets.
Sat, 09/12/2009 - 15:31 | 67804 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Two things: The recent phony rise in the stock market is not evidence of inflation and, unless the Fed is truly suicidal, it won't let the the USD crash. Since the USD is still the world's reserve currency, at least for the time being, it is the wild card to be played at the right opportunity. Ultimately, deflation is preferable to a hyperinflationary crash of the dollar. If we lose the dollar we lose everything. Sigmund

Sat, 09/12/2009 - 14:19 | 67752 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

And what IF Benny and his Buddys navigate the knife edge edge and we have niether? - all the while teetering one way and then the other. Then the laughs on every kno-it-all and told-you-so. It's the least supported idea, also the dullest and therefore interesting.

Sat, 09/12/2009 - 14:09 | 67740 JR
JR's picture

Abel Abelson, recounting in Barron’s today "the continuing lack of evidence" that the economy is about to take wing, contrary to the hyper mood of investors, cites yet another vote for deflation.  Writes Abelson:

“Employing his usual restrained prose, Societe Generale’s Albert Edwards articulates some of these misgivings in his latest weekly screed: ‘It’s almost as if the biggest credit bubble in history never occurred.  Investors are increasingly convinced that a sustainable global recovery is emerging out of the wreckage.  All praise to the central bankers for saving the world!  I’m waiting till someone writes about the return of the Great Moderation and suggests Ben Bernanke is the new Maestro.  Then I’ll know the lunatics have taken over the madhouse…yet again.’

“Take a look, he says, at the ever-shrinking rate of bank lending to the private sector around the world, which ‘makes it as clear as the nose on my face that the global economy is still very, very sick.’  And Albert’s nose, from all reports is definitely visible.  The problem, he contends, is that the deleveraging that invariably follows a boom gone bust is starting to unfold in earnest.

“Contrary to the prevailing view that the oodles of stimulus that has so thoroughly soaked economies worldwide will lead ineluctably to inflation, he’s adamantly convinced deflation is lurking around the corner, poised to pounce next year.  He cites the Baltic Freight Commodity Index, now languishing 40% below its June high, as a telltale sign of lagging global demand and an ominous portent of the gathering trend.”

Sat, 09/12/2009 - 13:45 | 67726 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

the inflation vs. deflation debate is the wrong question. they can happen at the same time to different asset classes.

nominal values can rise while real purchasing power decreases. nominal values can also drop while real purchasing power decreases.

Sat, 09/12/2009 - 13:27 | 67717 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

The good thing about deflation is it crushes gold amd leaves our Chinese overlords holding the bag. Then we default on the debt. Opps, I'm sorry there is no good way out of this mess.

Sat, 09/12/2009 - 13:22 | 67713 TomJoad
TomJoad's picture

I trademarked it last week on some forgotten comment here on ZH "Hyperstagdeinflation" (TM) I think near term deflation, long term hyperinflation and currency crisis. As with everything though, timing is key. And mine is horrid, I completely bailed on all equity positions in Feb 09 for example. So don't listen to me.

Sat, 09/12/2009 - 13:16 | 67703 Ich bin ein whatever
Ich bin ein whatever's picture

Here's what I believe will happen, for what it's worth.

I voted for deflation, becuse in the next 18 months, that will be what sinks us further into the abyss.

The sheeple are not spending.  The banks are cutting their credit.  Plus there are the people that are deciding not to spend, and are deciding to not use the credit that they have.  They are paying in cash, or not purchasing very many "discretionary" items at all, choosing to buy only essentials.

Housing just flat out sucks.  Foreclosures are going to continue to kill us and bring housing prices down, down, down.  People who had counted on using their houses as a factor in their retirement are waking up to the fact that a house isn't an investment anymore, it's simply a place to live.  People who are waking up to that fact...refer to point number one.  They aren't going to spend money.  They have to save their money to retire on.  Many of these people are the ones that the economists refer to as having "cash on the sidelines", eagerly anticipating a return to the stock market.  I think the economists are wrong.  These people are holding on to their money for dear life, because they have lost trust in practically everyone and everyone.

You won't see these people posting here.  You won't see them protesting in front of their Town Hall.  You won't even hear them saying things that go against the government.  But they cast a silent shadow with their personal habits related to how and when they spend (and invest) their money).  They are speaking loudly and clearly.  They don't trust the reforms.

I believe there will be massive deflation in the things that we own. 

There will be inflation in the things we need to survive...mainly energy related items that we have to import.

The dollar, which is a fiat currency and is not pegged to anything, will be toast.  Stick a fork in it, it's done.

I have often stated to my family that the economy seems somewhat pegged to someone who is manic-depressive.  If it is in it's manic phase, it keeps going up and up, no matter what bad news it hears...If it's in freefall, nothing rescues it, it just keeps tanking, no matter what.

These are humans with herd instincts who are doing the buying and selling.  It does us good to remember that.

Sat, 09/12/2009 - 13:06 | 67695 joann
joann's picture

Does that include increased taxes, if so, yes to inflation.

If it excludes taxes, then deflation.

Sat, 09/12/2009 - 12:58 | 67687 TumblingDice
TumblingDice's picture

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSuR2IgnimA

which ever one is occuring in that video.

Looks like deflation to me.

Sun, 09/13/2009 - 23:13 | 68432 MinnesotaNice
MinnesotaNice's picture

Good pictorial analogy of the next leg down in our economy...

Sat, 09/12/2009 - 12:02 | 67626 fuu
fuu's picture

I read the question as would the geographical area of the US inflate or deflate over the next 18 months. I think deflating area is more likely than inflating area. 

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!