Pro-European MPs from various political parties are pushing back against claims made by Prime Minister Theresa May's government that a second Brexit referendum - which supporters have branded as a "People's Vote" on May's deal - would take roughly 14 months to organize, according to RT.
I have got hold a copy of the guidance setting out why it takes 12 months to organise another EU refrendum. You can read it for yourself here: https://t.co/5iBxHvkxKR— Christopher Hope (@christopherhope) January 17, 2019
But while support for a second vote grows, one of the most notorious proponents of the original "Vote Leave" campaign is hinting at a possible return to politics to try and fight the effort.
After abandoning UKIP, the party he helped create, late last year, Nigel Farage said Friday that he would be willing to wage another "Vote Leave" campaign, even if he needed to use another party as the "vehicle" for his opposition. Farage also pointed out that a delay of Brexit Day would likely put it after the European Parliament elections in May.
"I think, I fear that the House of Commons is going to effectively overturn that Brexit. To me, the most likely outcome of all of this is an extension of Article 50. There could be another referendum," he told Sky News.
According to official government guidance shown to lawmakers on Wednesday, which was subsequently leaked to the Telegraph, as May tries to head off a push by ministers who see a second referendum as the best viable alternative to May's deal - a position that's becoming increasingly popular with Labour Party MPs.
"In order to inform the discussions, a very short paper set out in factual detail the number of months that would be required, this was illustrative only and our position of course is that there will be no second referendum,," May said. The statement comes as May has been meeting with ministers and leaders from all parties to try to find a consensus deal that could potentially pass in the House of Commons.
The 14 month estimate is how long May and her government expect it would take to pass the primary legislation calling for the referendum (seven months), conduct the question testing with the election committee (12 weeks), pass secondary legislation (six weeks) and conduct the campaigns (16 weeks).
May has repeatedly insisted that a second referendum wouldn't be feasible because it would require a lengthy delay of Brexit Day, and because it would set a dangerous precedent that wouldn't offer any more clarity (if some MPs are unhappy with the outcome, couldn't they just push for a third referendum?). A spokesperson for No. 10 Downing Street said the guidance was produced purely for the purpose of "illustrative discussion" and that the government continued to oppose another vote.
Meanwhile, a vote on May's "Plan B", expected to include a few minor alterations from the deal's previous iteration, has been called for Jan. 29, prompting some MPs to accuse May of trying to run out the clock. May is expected to present the new deal on Monday.
Former Tory Attorney General and pro-remainer MP Dominic Grieve blasted May's timetable as wrong and said that the government “must be aware of it themselves," while former Justice Minister Dr Phillip Lee, who resigned his cabinet seat in June over May's Brexit policy, denounced her warning as "nonsense."
Nonsense. It’s high time we dealt in facts. We can hold a referendum much more quickly if the Government commits to this solution that’s fair as well as swift and gets behind it. People have a #RighttoVote on this & it’s a sign of desperation that the Govt is trying to deny them https://t.co/CtWH0h8WX6— Dr Phillip Lee MP (@DrPhillipLeeMP) January 17, 2019
As May pieces together her revised deal, more MPs are urging her to drop her infamous "red lines" (Labour in particular would like to see the UK remain part of the Customs Union), but with no clear alternative to May's plan emerging, a delay of Brexit Day is looking like a virtual certainty.