There are quite a few people around the world who look upon this institution as yet another artifice for utilizing a pot of public money to clean up the financial clusterfucks left behind by the Banksta globalists. On terms tantamount to...you guessed it, rich country/poor country double standards and nothing less than cross border financial rape. 

Rape is a serious offense, both in the criminal act itself, but also when perpetrated in the figurative sense against the people of a country.

So is it so surprising that the leader of this institution has the history which the previously hushed MSM today reveals?

I for one am not surprised at all.

However, the accused should always be accorded the benefit of the doubt.

It is the IMF everyone should be doubting at this time. Is it not?

There's one thing almost as bad as being lectured on human rights violations by Hillary, being lectured by the IMF on fiscal responsibility.

And isn't this as good a time as any to be bringing it up?