NYT Publishes Report 'Debunking' FBI Use Of Dossier, Gets Immediately Shredded For Fake News

Content originally published at iBankCoin.com

According to the New York Times, the FBI investigation into Russian collusion began after drunken Trump campaign volunteer, George Papadopoulos, reportedly told Australian diplomat Alexander Downer at a London bar in May, 2016 that "Russia had political dirt on Hillary Clinton." When DNC emails began to leak, Australia apparently contacted US intelligence to report the drunken admission by Papadopoulos - igniting the Russia probe.


This is in stark contrast to GOP leaders who say that a salacious and unverified 34-page opposition research dossier triggered the probe, a claim repeated by President Trump on Tuesday: 

Four days later, the New York Times crafted an alternate explanation involving Papadopoulos: 

WASHINGTON — During a night of heavy drinking at an upscale London bar in May 2016, George Papadopoulos, a young foreign policy adviser to the Trump campaign, made a startling revelation to Australia’s top diplomat in Britain: Russia had political dirt on Hillary Clinton.

About three weeks earlier, Mr. Papadopoulos had been told that Moscow had thousands of emails that would embarrass Mrs. Clinton, apparently stolen in an effort to try to damage her campaign.

Exactly how much Mr. Papadopoulos said that night at the Kensington Wine Rooms with the Australian, Alexander Downer, is unclear. But two months later, when leaked Democratic emails began appearing online, Australian officials passed the information about Mr. Papadopoulos to their American counterparts, according to four current and former American and foreign officials with direct knowledge of the Australians’ role.

The NYT's Adam Goldman - who worked on the article as part of a six-person effort, tweeted the report, stating "Dossier had nothing to do with @FBI opening July 2016 investigation into Russian election meddling. George Papadopoulos outreach op and Russian hacking did," which the NYT's Maggie Haberman retweeted. 


Unfortunately for the New York Times - much like CNN's botched "Bombshell" report from a few weeks ago that Donald Trump Jr. was told about the WikiLeaks emails before their release, only to issue a major correction because Trump Jr. was told after they were made public (by a random person), this "startling revelation" ny the NYT that Papadopoulos spilled the beans about Russia having dirt on Clinton was already public information.

Cue the NYT getting split like a cord of wood by the Conservative Treehouse's TheLastRefuge, who dressed down the entire Papadopoulos narrative in a 21-tweet dissertation (below).

Meanwhile, as pointed out by The Gateway Pundit's Cristina Laila, the Washington Examiner's Byron York further tore into the NYT report: 



Perhaps the most embarassing part for the New York Times isn't that they appear to have published yet another massive case of Fake News - but that it took six of their 'best and brightest' to cobble it together. 


Follow on Twitter @ZeroPointNow § Subscribe to our YouTube channel


CuttingEdge Bendromeda Strain Mon, 01/01/2018 - 07:07 Permalink

Take note of how many times, on a daily basis, the MSM Dem stoolies use the term "nothingburger" when referring to anything alluding to Hillary and her cabal's past discretions. I only do Hannity, Tucker and Pirro on Fox, and every Dem defender they have had on uses it with a passion. It was probably sent out by Dave Brock as an SOP directive to all and sundry.

Guess what, you morally corrupted cunts?

Endless blatant deflection with bullshit didn't work very well for Hillary with Fusion (please note the deluge of raw sewerage hanging over everyone's heads on your side of the aisle). And no matter how well coordinated, it won't work for you either, and only serves to destroy whatever (in some cases zero) credibility you have left.




In reply to by Bendromeda Strain

Librarian CuttingEdge Mon, 01/01/2018 - 16:43 Permalink

I'm fairly certain that "credibility" is off the table at this point.  That ship sailed months ago.  They are in full damage control mode.  As soon as someone actually serves a single day in custody that's when things are going to go off the scale.  At that point we may very well see several well-known journalists dying from "heart attacks".  (Ankle GPS-medical boot custody theorists, for goodness sakes, please buy a GPS transmitter detector and prove your theory. They aren't expensive) 

In reply to by CuttingEdge

kapella spekulatn Mon, 01/01/2018 - 11:33 Permalink

NYT is a propaganda machine mostly controlled by the world's biggest drug smuggler - Carlos Slim. There is no bigger proponent of amnesty for illegals than the Grey Lady. I spend a lot of time in Mexico and ole gentlemanly Senor Slim runs the whole show. His grocery store chain, Soriana, just took out their largest rival MEGA.

He controls Tel-Mex, Telcel, toll roads , harbors, real estate development, retail chains and Mexican TV stations. He is now launching Our Vision in the US. A spanish language TV station “made by Mexicans, for Mexicans” and another s---hole of lies and disinformation.

Of course, man-of-the-people Slim would never get involved with the world's most profitable business - manufacturing illegal narcotics, shipping them into the USA and distributing through street gangs. That would be illegal. He is content to run everything else in Mexico and let the dope be handled by others. Certainly.

In reply to by spekulatn

Winston Smith 2009 takeaction Sun, 12/31/2017 - 16:54 Permalink

Links to his blog below. He's what investigative reporters should be like but most defintely are NOT like these days. He's sharp as a tack and doesn't miss a thing.

Transparent DOJ and FBI Desperation: New York Times Attempts “Trump Operation” Justification…
December 30, 2017


BREAKING: Senator Lindsey Graham Just Confirmed The Steele Dossier Was Used For 2016 FISA Warrant…
December 30, 2017


The article found below is where he discusses his first clue about the HUGE scandal confirmed at the above DETAILED analyses. If this doesn't result in just a whole bunch of high level swamp creatures doing a perp walk or AT THE VERY LEAST losing their jobs, you'll know there's no hope:

THE BIG UGLY – Why U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras Recusal From Mike Flynn Case is a Big Deal…
December 8, 2017


In reply to by takeaction

greenskeeper carl takeaction Sun, 12/31/2017 - 19:12 Permalink

Yes he is. I just wish people like him had a wider following. The problem is probably less than 10% of the people that read the NYT's pile of vomit will ever read that stuff, or anything else that counters it. THATS why the NYT et al keep doing this. It gets the disinformation out, but they know most of their readers will never see the various places it gets proven wrong. Sure, if its bad enough, they might be forced to issue a reluctant retraction, but even those are full of weasel language, where they say essentially that 'we can't prove this happened like we said, but its probably true anyway'. But by then, their flunkies have already posted it all over the internet and its been read and re-twated or whatever a couple million times.

In reply to by takeaction

Lucretius Librarian Tue, 01/02/2018 - 03:42 Permalink

"disapologistis" +1, for creative use of english (NOT ebonics)!

 There exists, all too many "phrases" to call bullshit bullshit.

I call bullshit on this bullshittery!

WTF is the spell checker Tylerz? The grammer natzis are gonna kill me!!! The new and unproved site is slicker and speedier than DIAL UP! BTW, that means you suck!

In reply to by Librarian

Socratic Dog VWAndy Sun, 12/31/2017 - 16:01 Permalink

It's good to know that freedom in the US depends on people who think in-depth news and analysis reports should consist only of cut-and-pasted Twitter streams.

What the fuck is this twitter bullshit?  Learn to write, reporters, or fuck off.  At least they actually write on the NYT.  Fiction maybe, but it's still writing.

In reply to by VWAndy

Lucretius Socratic Dog Tue, 01/02/2018 - 03:56 Permalink

F the jew yerk slimes ( if it helps you, think of it as pravada, or spooks daily), but I must agree, on one point, only   . Copy and paste a maximum of 140 characters does not make for "reporting", a story, or an article. I may be a bit of a fossil, but I do have an attention span longer than that of a gnat. .gov kuntz!

In reply to by Socratic Dog

NoPension Sun, 12/31/2017 - 15:34 Permalink

I read that fucking NYT peice ( peice of shit ). Came away thinking...these folks need to be crushed. Destroyed...with extreme prejudice. They continue to double down, in the face of all we collectively know! 

  I suppose...there was a window of time...where if the " Hillary " crowd would have simply conceded defeat...and let the new President do his job...he ( Potus) would have let sleeping dogs lye. But nooooo.....

   At this point...crush these fucking fucks. They are either too stupid to play in this arena...or they believe we are stupid enough to still buy their bullshit. 

  Either way....go medieval on their ass. 

francis_the_wo… NoPension Sun, 12/31/2017 - 18:21 Permalink

I had the same reaction when I read that NYT spin this morning on my phone.

Regarding Hillary "conceding", they can't.  They went all in on the globalist CAGW agenda and are completely financially dependent on the gov't giveaways 8 years of Obama corruption gave them.  A Trump presidency will set them back decades, and I don't think they'll ever get that close to enacting their CAGW plot again.  

They haven't walked away because they can't.  They went full retard.

In reply to by NoPension

Oldwood francis_the_wo… Sun, 12/31/2017 - 21:08 Permalink

Like you say they can't. To stop is to quit which is to admit defeat, which is to beg what the fuck they were thinking in the first place, which pretty much puts the rope around their necks.

Their base is very fragile, which is why the democratic party turned hard left, chasing the last of the truly deluded and brain dead who will never acknowledge any contradictory facts. Insanity is their last refuge and their only rational excuse. Look for them to plead insanity at their trials, probably with Gloria Allred at the helm..

In reply to by francis_the_wo…

jin187 ThreeRs Tue, 01/02/2018 - 02:43 Permalink

There's one thing I don't get about this whole issue.  Is that even a crime?  There are some laws regarding handing money to a person, basically restricting how much, and how often.  Actually altering, impeding, or extorting a vote is a crime.  I've never heard of it being a crime to try and convince someone to vote a certain way though, even if it involves lies and trickery.  Putin himself could pull out his Tracfone, and start dialing random American numbers just to ask people to vote how he wants, and there would be no crime far as I know.

In reply to by ThreeRs

Librarian Oldwood Mon, 01/01/2018 - 17:23 Permalink

I think they have confused political and economic insanity with legal insanity.

There was an hrc underling last year who seems to have stated what is playing out now.  He said that he was claiming his first amendment right (to keep repeating non sequitors in a hearing and through the MSM) which by operation would actually be his fifth amendment right not to incriminate himself.  

But that just doesn't sound as nice when stated in a straightforward manner under oath.  House Subcommitee:  Mr. Liddy to you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?"  Liddy:  "NO".

That was back in 1973.  

But Trump is not Nixon.  The NeoCon-Globalist Secret Plan absolutely depended on hrc winning.  That didn't happen.  The soon-to-be-convicted felons are still using their Nixon playbooks forgetting the obvious difference -- that Nixon recorded his own calls.  It seems obvious that they should recognize that here we have the reverse.  Trump's communications were illegally recorded.

How far will this all ago?  I think that only the Trump WH can answer that question.

I think that we still have the matter of corruption in the media to work through.  That could take at least another year or two


In reply to by Oldwood

Anunnaki Sun, 12/31/2017 - 15:48 Permalink

Jew York Times blinded by their hatred of Trump and willing to ruin their reputation, as it were, looking for the Trump Silver Bullet

PS - Cankles still won’t be President 

Kayman Anunnaki Sun, 12/31/2017 - 19:12 Permalink

NYT = ODS = Old Dork Slimes

Love or Hate Trump-  these stupid fucks still don't get it. You are writing for the converted.  Tell your audience the moon is made out of cheese and Trump took more than his fair share making a toasted cheese sandwich, and they will believe you.

But eating your own excrement doesn't make you an investigative journalist, and writing about Trump jay-walking while Obama is eating babies, is just plain ODS.

Why doesn't the NYT hire someone literate to write their own obit.


In reply to by Anunnaki