Brandon Smith: Is The Olympic Games In South Korea A Perfect Opportunity For A False Flag Attack?

Authored by Brandon Smith via,

The war rhetoric surrounding North Korea on both sides of the Pacific has never been more aggressive than it has been the past year (at least not since the Korean War). There are some people that see the entire affair as a "distraction," a distraction that will never amount to actual conflict. I disagree with this sentiment for a number of reasons.

North Korea is indeed a distraction, but still a distraction in the making. That is to say, the chest beating and saber rattling are merely a prelude to the much more effective distraction of live combat and invasion in the name of regime change and "national security." As I noted in my article "Korean War Part II: Why It's Probably Going To Happen," the extensive staging of military assets to the region that has not been seen in over a decade, the extremely swift advancement of North Korean missile technology to include ICBMs capable of reaching the mainland U.S., the strange and unprecedented language by China indicating that they will not intercede against an invasion of North Korea by the U.S. "if Pyongyang attacks first...." All of this and more shows a clear movement of chess pieces into place for a sudden action.

According to these factors, I am led to believe that a false flag event blamed on North Korea, or a prodding of North Korea into taking an attack posture, is likely.

The purposes behind such a war would be many-fold. Primarily, the final implosion of the vast financial bubbles created by central bank stimulus measures could be undertaken while the banks themselves escape public blame or prosecution.

A geopolitical crisis large enough would provide a perfect scapegoat for an economic crisis that was going to develop eventually anyway. And, if this geopolitical crisis were initiated by a "rogue state," along with the poor decisions of a conservative "populist" president (Trump), then the historical narrative would be complete. Future generations would talk about the "great blunder" of sovereign states and nationalists and how hubris and greed and ego led to a global fiscal disaster and unnecessary destruction. The rationale for a one world governmental authority would be planted in the minds of the populace.

Will a war in North Korea be the trigger event for this narrative? It's hard to say, as there are so many potential geopolitical powder kegs around the world. However, ample assets to initiate this kind of event are present around North Korea. And, unlike hot spots like Syria and Iran, North Korea offers the most immediate and tangible threat in the minds of many people with its nuclear arsenal.

The pure panic and mindless reactionary thinking that can be provoked in the unprepared when the danger of nukes is present is quite powerful. This could not have been made more clear than this past week when an "accidental" warning of a live ICBM launch occurred in Hawaii.

The Hawaii Emergency Management Agency now claims that this false alarm was started by a single employee, who has not been named.  How? They somehow "pushed the wrong button" ... twice!

I find this explanation absurd. I can only find one example of a false alarm similar to the one in Hawaii, and this took place way back in 1971 with a mix-up of tapes leading to a broadcast warning of imminent attack on the U.S. After this event, the alert system was subject to streamlining and stopgaps designed to prevent it from ever happening again. During the false alarm of 1971, over six attempts were made for cancellation broadcasts, the first one within about ten minutes of the initial false alarm. In Hawaii, no cancellation was attempted for nearly 40 minutes.

To add to the overall strangeness, there was yet another false missile alarm in Japan within the same week!  Yet again, this alert was immediately attributed to North Korea, but at least this time the alert was corrected 5 minutes later instead of 40.

To me, this smells of a psyop; a test to gauge public reactions to a threat, as well as planting preconceived notions of a particular bogeyman. The public did not disappoint.

Eye witnesses described people "running and crying in the streets," completely bewildered as to what to do. An associate of mine (who is also experienced in preparedness) was in Hawaii at the time of the event. She related to me that her family decided to shelter in place because there were no indications that fallout shelters were available anyway. Other people tried to lower their children into the sewers in an effort to escape a nuclear blast. Here is a video showing the false missile alert causing hysteria in Hawaii:

(As a side note, sheltering in a sewer during an actual nuclear event is the height of stupidity. Nuclear blasts send irradiated particulates into the air. These particulates then settle in the streets or are washed out of the air by rainfall. This water becomes a highly concentrated dose of irradiated particulates which are then drained down into the sewers. You might survive the initial blast, you might not, but you are certain to die from radiation if waiting out the attack in a sewer. Shelter in a dry basement instead with as much matter density between you and the outside as possible. Keep in mind that whatever place you choose to shelter is where you will likely have to stay for at least two weeks, or until the nuclear half life of the particulates has run its course.)

Obviously the average American is completely unprepared for a real attack of a minor magnitude, let alone the magnitude of a nuclear blast. Perhaps this reaction in Hawaii was so prevalent because Hawaii tends to be left leaning to the extreme, and leftists are generally poorly prepared for anything beyond a cancellation by their manicurists. That said, the fact that this "mistake" happened to take place in Hawaii  and Japan which are already under stress due to the ballistic missile tests of North Korea is an interesting coincidence indeed.

Seeing what the reaction in Hawaii was like, a real attack presents an alluring opportunity for the establishment. The pure terror involved in just the potential of a nuclear attack is palpable, and this fear makes the masses easy to manipulate. Should a real attack take place, either by North Korea or by other agencies through false flag, when is the most advantageous time?

The history of Korean conflict suggests a surprise attack is a probable strategy. North Korea is a nation trapped in time, and North Korean authorities remember the success of the surprise attacks they used to launch the first Korean war in June 1950. These attacks allowed North Korea communists to overrun South Korean forces within days.

In terms of a false flag event, these seem to occur in the midst of other "training exercises" or distracting events. I can't think of anything more distracting for South Korea than the Winter Olympics, set to take place February 9-25 in Pyeongchang.

I would note the sudden friendly demeanor between North Korea and South Korea just before the Olympics, including the offer by North Korea to participate in a joint women's hockey team during the games (something that has never happened before). Would it not be a shame if this ember of goodwill was snuffed out by a North Korean missile test or attack of some kind? The "betrayal" would be excellent war fuel, like a new Pearl Harbor.

As Secretary of State Rex Tillerson stated recently, the threat of war with North Korea is "growing" despite the recent "thaw" in relations due to the Olympic Games.  The thaw is partially predicated on the North Korean demand that all South Korean and US military exercises be cancelled during negotiations.

The typical response by skeptics will be that any attack by North Korea would be met with massive nuclear response. I would point out that a full-scale nuclear response is unlikely in the region.

First, a nuclear onslaught on North Korea also puts its neighbors (our allies) at risk of considerable radiation exposure. The argument may be made that only a conventional assault would be safe for the surrounding countries, not to mention the Pacific U.S., which could see radiation exposure as well.

Second, a nuke attack is not necessarily going to prevent the need for a ground invasion. North Korea has more than 8,000 underground facilities that we know of and has been preparing for bombardment for over 60 years. Its mountainous terrain also presents serious doubts as to the effectiveness of bombardment. This is not just my assessment but the assessment of the Department of Defense. The idea that one big nuke button is going to solve the problem is childish delusion by people who watch too many movies.

Hopefully, the Olympics will conclude without incident and the skeptics are proven correct on North Korean tensions being nothing more than a sideshow amounting to a lot of bluster. But for now the level of conflict staging over the past year should be taken seriously, and the panic that could develop if a war does erupt should be concerning to us all. In times of crisis, people act stupidly and they beg for help from anyone offering, even if it is someone with malicious intent. Fearful individuals will give up almost anything to escape uncertainty, including their freedom and their common sense. And nothing causes fear quite so much as thoughts of war and mushroom clouds.



Sir Edge zorba THE GREEK Wed, 01/17/2018 - 23:49 Permalink

North Korea vs The USA... Distracting War of Words...

But the USA is STILL in Syria and building another army of 'rebels'... to HELP Syria...…

  • The US acknowledged on Sunday that IT'S TRAINING A FORCE of 30,000 personnel to operate along the north and eastern parts of Syria.


In reply to by zorba THE GREEK

LetThemEatRand Wed, 01/17/2018 - 23:14 Permalink

It bears repeating -- they won't name the "employee" who "pushed the wrong button."  Because there is no employee who pushed the wrong button.  And the MSM, for all its great work and determination in uncovering Trump hook ups from ten years ago isn't even asking or filing FOIA requests.

twogirlsonecovfefe LetThemEatRand Thu, 01/18/2018 - 06:48 Permalink

No, it's probably because they don't want to ruin the guys life. Have you existed in the real world at all? Come out of that basement apartment at all?

There's no point in outing the guy because... who cares. If you haven't noticed, people make mistakes. Throwing someone under the bus does nothing to serve anyone. Would probably just ruin the dudes life. Like whatever, people got to practice their little emergency response. What we found is that people are stupid and just go into mass hysteria instead of making logical decisions.

Except I guess the conspiracy theorists that have been wearing the tin foil so long it's just become part of them. Let's be honest, no matter who they say did it, you would be the first person saying "nah, that's not who it was. It was muh gubbamint CIA JOO SPOOKS."

In reply to by LetThemEatRand

Cabreado Wed, 01/17/2018 - 23:21 Permalink

I think it will go fine.

Controllers and sociopaths are opportunists, and terrified of exposure.

Kim has already been admonished by China, and the World is watching.

There is no comfortable basis for false flag...

CatInTheHat Cabreado Thu, 01/18/2018 - 00:59 Permalink

More than not in America know 9/11 was a false flag operation. Even if not admitted to self, because the most frightening thing to think about is that your government would go out of its way to murder Americans to justify a War on Terror.

But that's just what happened. What we are dealing with are sociopaths and one of the things they LOVE best is when the public REACTS to something they do. Its literally INTOXICATING to them. Even if it means death. I could see them all gathered before a huge TV screen watching the terrified in Hawaii, just to see how their POWER manipulates others to do their planned bidding. If people only understood this. The elite are extremely predictable. One more major false flag, given all the knowledge we have now about 9/11 and the mass military build up going on around the world, coupled with all the bombastic rhetoric, Russia gate, Iran protests etc, they really couldn't blame anyone else. It's just too damned OBVIOUS. It might take a minute or two afterward, but Trump somewhat gives it all away and if you're a thinking person, CONgress does too. 


I disagree with Brandon on that one point. The American people will know exactly who is to blame. 

In reply to by Cabreado

Dragon HAwk Wed, 01/17/2018 - 23:27 Permalink

You can bet your ass if i was on the street and saw a flash i would jump down a sewer.  I'll worry about the rain and fallout later if i can. dark side of a building on the ground is second choice

Yen Cross Dragon HAwk Wed, 01/17/2018 - 23:32 Permalink

  If you see the flash, it's probably too late. If your retinas aren't already fried, massive shock ~~~ waves are seconds behind.

  The Sun isn't combustible, like wood. That's why it's just over 9% Helium.  :-)

  Fusion needs gravity, and for a split second, it gets it/


  For posterity sake...  If you're in a time machine~ or something~ the Mushroom Clouds are impressive.

In reply to by Dragon HAwk

house biscuit Yen Cross Thu, 01/18/2018 - 04:52 Permalink

Uh, no.

First, let's assume the nukes are real- because some people believe they're a hoax, too.

Next, while the flash travels at light speed, the blast assuredly does not.

So a substantial fraction of people could have 10-45 seconds to take cover- a potential lifesaver.

Assuming one knows what to do if a flash occurs.

Those wanting a great lesson on this should watch the related YT videos from 'Tin Hat Ranch'

In reply to by Yen Cross

Ajax-1 ThePhantom Thu, 01/18/2018 - 00:43 Permalink

Talk is cheap. Lil Kim is using the old "let's talk scam" in order to buy time to perfect his missile guidance systems. If you recall, the North Vietnamese leadership used the same ploy during the war. Every time, their asses were against the wall, they would call for peace talks in Paris in an effort to re-enforce and re-arm on the battlefield. The USA fell for the disingenuous BS every time. THAT'S WHY.

In reply to by ThePhantom

cowdogg Thu, 01/18/2018 - 00:00 Permalink

A war against North Korea would be the height of stupidity. Such a war would be a direct threat against BOTH Russia and China and there is no possibility of the US surviving such a conflict. It certainly would be the last war the US ever instigated.

Muirchertach Thu, 01/18/2018 - 00:14 Permalink

Smith is a blowhard who 4 out of 5 times is crystal-balling something all of us have known for years/decades. Is the Olympic games an opportunity? Yes, we all know that it is. Yes is enough; no article necessary. Are the elites are trying to ban cash. Yes, obviously, and they're mostly failing or behind the curve (80-90% of transactions worldwide including in many developed countries are still in cash. India? 80% there don't even possess a card of any kind.). Will the elites try to use blockchain to institute cashless financial grid. Yes. Maybe he's trying to disrupt their plans by giving them publicity?

He denies the faking of events (like some other people we know) and doesn't tell us anything that many people don't know and it would actually be useful to write on, like:

-the NYC planes on 9/11 were CGI and there were no hijackers, media was in on it
-nobody died at Sandy Hook Boston Paris etc; they were drills cast as reality
-black Americans are mostly non-African, they're Eastern / Southeastern Indians, majority of whom were negro, not mongoloid
-the entire concept of a UFO/little green man and mythology around them is a nearly century-long Pentagon project to set the stage for a fake ET encounter in order to usher in global government

And if you point any of this stuff out in his boring articles on mass shootings (treating them as if they're all real), he'll call you crazy and irrational. 

If you make any criticism of him whatsoever - including challenging the imminence of his many predictions (when presenting the elites' mere plans as incredibly imminent and hopeless to resist is classic cointel disinfo *cough cough* Alex Jones *cough*) - he'll start with heavy-handed language: 'the bottom line is this' 'I've covered this before' 'end of story/discussion' and if you don't bow and kiss his ass after the first exchange, he'll ban your username and/or IP. Why does ZH promote/vaunt this censor-happy dork?

Muirchertach MusicIsYou Thu, 01/18/2018 - 00:36 Permalink

My work is done here; notice how the Clintons and Obama have their stupid annual appearance on Kimmel now, pitching the Rockefeller-funded 'Disclosure' [of nothing]? They might be dumb/arrogant enough to actually attempt this soon. Btw, I'm correct about all of them. Have doubts? Blacks, see von Wuthenau, Brown University's Early American Images Library (JCB). 9/11, see 911 Taboo. Sandy Hook, see David Wheeler FBI and dead kids singing at Superbowl.

In reply to by MusicIsYou