Is It Time To Start Worrying About China's Debt Default Avalanche

With Bank of America reporting that US corporate leverage just hit a fresh all time high...

... and with both Moody's and various restructuring bankers warning that the bond party is almost over, there is a distinct smell of corporate crisis in the air.

But what if the first domino to fall in the coming corporate debt crisis is not in the US, but in China?

After all, as part of China's aggressive deleveraging campaign, there has already been a spike of corporate bankruptcies as banks shed more of their massive note holdings and de-risk their balance sheets. According to Logan Wright, Hong Kong-based director at research firm Rhodium Group LLC, there have already been least 14 corporate bond defaults in China in 2018; a separate analysis by Economic Information Daily, as of May 25, there had already been no less than 20 corporate defaults, involving more than 17 billion yuan, a shockingly high number for a country which until recently had never seen a single corporate bankruptcy, and a number which is set to increase as Chinese banks pull pull back from lending to other firms that use the funds to buy bonds, exacerbating the pressure on the market.

"You have seen banks redeeming funds placed with non-bank financial institutions that have reduced the pool of funds available for corporate bond investment overall," Wright told Bloomberg, adding that additional bond defaults are especially likely among those property developers and local-government financing vehicles which have relied on shadow banking sources of funds.

As we discussed last year, as part of Beijing's crackdown on China's $10 trillion shadow banking sector, strains have spread from high-yield trust products to corporate bonds as the lack of shadow funding has choked off refinancing for weaker borrowers. Separately, Banks’ lending to other financial firms, a common route for funds and securities brokers to add leverage for corporate bond investments, declined for three straight months, or a total of 1.7 trillion yuan ($265 billion), since January according to Bloomberg calculations.

The deleveraging campaign is also depressing bond demand: “Unlike the U.S., where the majority of buyers of bonds are mutual funds, individuals and investment companies, in China, the key holders of bonds are bank on-and off-balance sheet positions,” said Jason Bedford, a Hong Kong-based analyst at UBS Group AG, who noted that Chinese banks are buying far fewer bonds as a result.

Putting the number in context, according to Bloomberg, China’s four largest banks held about 4.1 trillion yuan in bonds issued by companies and other financial institutions at the end of 2017, nearly 20% below 5.1 trillion yuan a year earlier; all Chinese banks held about 12 trillion yuan of corporate bonds on or off their balances sheets, some 70% of outstanding issuance, according to Citic.

It is therefore hardly surprising to see that Chinese corporate bonds, especially riskier issues, have been getting slammed in recent weeks. According to Chinabond data, as noted first by Bloomberg, the yield premium of three-year AA- rated bonds over similar-maturity AAA notes has blown out 72 bps since March to 225 basis points, the highest level since August 2016, an indication of the recent pressures on weaker firms. One can imagine what is going on with deep junk-rated corps.

Today, Bloomberg's Sebastian Boyd points out that of all emerging markets, it is in China where the weekly Bloomberg Barclays global high yield index has seen the biggest drop (for the reasons why EM is getting crushed, read the lament by RBI governor Urjit Patel). Also worth noting: China is the biggest component by far in the various bond index aggregators, accounting for more than the next two countries, Brazil and Mexico, combined.

The deterioration accelerated over the past week when state-owned China Energy Reserve & Chemicals Group defaulted last Monday, blaming tighter credit conditions, slamming the performance of both the energy sector and wireline companies. Furthermore, as Boyd writes, "Chinese electricity-company bonds in dollars have widened an average of 125bps in the past week, led by Huachen Energy Co., a unit of Wintime Energy, after the Shanghai stock exchange queried its liquidity."

The recent blow out in Chinese corporate bond spooked none other than the PBOC, which last last Friday announced that it will accept lower-rated corporate bonds as collateral for a major liquidity management tool in a move that analysts see as designed in part to restore confidence in the country's corporate bond market.

Specifically, the central bank said that it had decided to expand the collateral pool for the medium-term lending facility (MLF) to include corporate bonds rated AA+ or AA by domestic rating agencies.  The central bank also added as collateral financial bonds rated AA and above with proceeds to support rural development, small enterprises and green projects, as well as high-quality loans supporting green projects and small enterprises, the PBoC said in a statement posted on its website.

The PBoC said the expansion of collateral would "help alleviate the financing difficulties of small companies and to promote the healthy development of the corporate bond market."

CICC confirmed as much, writing in a note that "the expansion of collateral for MLF, to some extent, is intended to bolster confidence in lower-rated corporate bonds ... and to avoid creating an apparent net financing gap which would impact the real economy."

Translated: the PBOC is providing yet another backdoor bailout to China's latest and greatest distressed sector in hopes of avoiding an avalanche of defaults as credit conditions become increasingly tighter as the PBOC hikes tit for tat with the Fed.

And while the PBOC intervention may delay the moment of reckoning for the world's most indebted corporate sector, it will not eliminate it. One potential catalyst: Chinese companies have to repay a total of 2.7 trillion yuan of bonds in the onshore and offshore market in the second half of this year, and together with another 3.3 trillion yuan of trust products set to mature in the second half, the funding problems will get worse. As already more than eight high-yield trust products have delayed payments so far this year.

To be sure, Beijing will do everything in its power to avoid a default waterfall, but another emerging - pardon the pun - risk is that as Boyd concludes, negative sentiment towards Chinese corporates could become a major headwind for EM debt, even as the crises in Argentina, Brazil and Turkey appear to calm down, resulting in another significant capital outflow from Emerging Markets, and even more pained complaints from EM central bankers begging the Fed to halt its tightening, or else.


RagnarDanneskjold zpinch Tue, 06/05/2018 - 14:33 Permalink

Still early in the game. Defaults are driven by regulatory changes and tight liquidity, but not economic factors. Yet. Similar to how the 2014-2016 default wave started. 

2014 Returns: New Default Wave Underway, Soaring Yields, Ratings Agencies Criticized, SOE Investors Flee Credit Market

But if China has to cut the RRR because MLFs aren't doing the trick, we could be talking about a new cycle high in USD. That could speed up the timeline.

Dollar Gain, EM Pain: More RRR Cuts Expected

In reply to by zpinch

rex-lacrymarum Justin Case Tue, 06/05/2018 - 17:04 Permalink

I think there is another point that is underestimated. When you go to China, you will notice something that has almost died out in the West due to over-taxation and over-regulation: an entrepreneurial spirit, a willingness to take risks and engage in wheeling and dealing. The value of such a mentality cannot be quantified, but I would argue it is extremely valuable.

Moreover, I believe that the sheer size of China's economy is widely underestimated, even by China's own bureaucracy. You may have noticed that they often have to revise their data because they suddenly notice they have overlooked entire sectors of the economy. This is not surprising, as the capitalist system is actually still relatively new to them. There are things happening a formerly communist bureaucrat cannot even conceive of, so how is he going to "count" them?  

In reply to by Justin Case

MoreFreedom Justin Case Tue, 06/05/2018 - 17:36 Permalink

You're missing the fact that the PBOC is now investing in corporate bonds.  I'll bet the bonds they're buying are from companies with political connections high up in the communist party.   This isn't capitalism, it's corporatism aka. crony capitalism and aka. government corruption.  You could also call it mercantilism as another poster does.   One thing it isn't is a free market.   It ensures inefficient markets in China, because politicians are picking the winners and losers in commerce, not consumers.

In reply to by Justin Case

Posa Justin Case Tue, 06/05/2018 - 17:14 Permalink

Not really. China is evolving into a form of Mercantile Capitalism reminiscent of the 19th Century American System of Lincoln and his circle and the German Customs Union capitalism, combined with 20th Century US New Frontier Capitalism (JFK)... what's being ditched in China is the Anglo-American Paper Capitalism. It's the difference between mechanical engineering (tangible objects) and financial engineering ( rent-seeking Ponzi schemes)

In reply to by Justin Case

AynRandObjectivist karenm Tue, 06/05/2018 - 15:57 Permalink

I don't think any of us can call it. Should it happen? Yes. When? Who the fuck knows. There are some powerful interests that want to maintain the status quo. And they are more powerful than market forces until they are not. That can happen overnight and it should happen. Until then, I'll lose money trading VXX every day hoping that the pop will outweigh that rape that I'm currently experiencing. 

In reply to by karenm

Number 9 Tue, 06/05/2018 - 14:29 Permalink

Ctrl P is the answer..

The Fed must let er rip and quit this stupid tightening bullshit,, the pricks are trying to starve the goyim..


next question

MAGA Tue, 06/05/2018 - 14:35 Permalink

it won’t affect outside. the problem is contained inside China. ZH is just bearish on everything, nothing interesting anymore.

Tamam Shud Tue, 06/05/2018 - 15:09 Permalink

I'd be really curious to see the comparison between state-owned and non-state-owned entities.  And for those state owned, is said state doing anything?

PGR88 Tue, 06/05/2018 - 15:10 Permalink

Debt will never cause a systemic crisis in China.  The Chinese Communist Party and government control literally every major player, and have influence over the entire economy.  They will shoot bureaucrats, print money, or buy debt as needed.  Yes, individuals will be allowed to go bankrupt, but then everyone will say "well, that's your own fault."

NEOSERF Tue, 06/05/2018 - 15:17 Permalink

If this game is to make sure that NPLs never see the light of day, then why would we think this year is any different than last for any country?  CBs will print to ensure those companies repay the bare minimum or are taken off line on a Saturday night with warm fuzzy press releases on Monday.  Not even close to a blow up.

sarcrilege Tue, 06/05/2018 - 15:32 Permalink

...and what if the first domino to fall in the coming corporate debt crisis is not in the US, nor in China but in Europe? ...and what if,?  ...., and what if... ? sheesh.

Calculus99 Tue, 06/05/2018 - 15:49 Permalink

Of course they'll print. 

But note what they CANNOT print? 

Bitcoin (and Gold to a lesser extent). 

Only 21million of them (circa 3-5m lost) and about 500 Million+ potential buyers on the planet. 

I say 'potential' because it's true, trouble is most of them don't realise it yet, they will...

youngman Tue, 06/05/2018 - 15:52 Permalink

They will just print up the money to give you a new loan to pay off the loan you could not pay before...and look...its preforming on my books now...all good....good comrade

shortonoil Tue, 06/05/2018 - 16:11 Permalink

Once foreign investors start to take a bath the EM capital outflows will turn from a flood into a tsunami. 36% of world GDP, and 44% of world trade are at stake. The average American won't be left with the funds for a ham sandwich.