UN Document From 2000 Exposes Global "Migration Replacement" Solution To Developed World Demographics

Ever wondered why so many western elites are so vehemently supportive of mass immigration? Ever question how willfully blind the establishment is to the costs (human and capital) of allowing any- and everyone into the heart of European nations? Well wonder no more...

As a reminder, the world faces decades of depopulation. Our present economic issues began decades ago.  To understand what is happening economically, simply check the headwaters of (de)population (excluding Africa) under way since 1990...the chart below shows the 0-5yr/old population (excluding Africa) vs. the 0-5yr/old population of Africa. 

World 0-5yr/old population change (excluding Africa):

  • 1950-->1990 + 234m
  • 1990-->2015 <-47m>
  • 2015-->2050 <-67m> (UN med. est.)

Africa 0-5yr/old population change:

  • 1950-->1990 + 71m
  • 1990-->2015 +75m
  • 2015-->2050 +95m (UN med. est.)

Population growth is responsible for the majority of GDP growth...so a downturn in population growth matters...particularly when population growth shifts from wealthy or developing nations to the poorest.  I'm not describing something that may happen in the future...I'm describing what has already happened that is continuing to send progressively larger tsunamis swamping the world economy and has the central bankers doing everything and anything to try to sustain the unsustainable.

Which means, as Econimica's Chris Hamilton recently noted, the next business cycle recession will be unending and is very likely to run years into decades and perhaps a century or more.  A declining population already indebted with record debt and zero interest rates will consume less...meaning overcapacity and excess inventories will never be fully cleared before the next downturn...and on and on and on.

But the absence of a growing consumer base isn't just a US issue...this is a global problem.  The annual growth of the 0-64yr/old population of the combined OECD nations (most the EU, US, Canada, Mexico, Chile, Japan, S. Korea, Australia / New Zealand) plus China, Brazil, and Russia show the growth that has driven nearly all economic growth has come to an end...and begins declining from here on. 

And when importers are shrinking, exporters have no one to export to...and on and on and on.  The depopulation we are now facing is not simply a demographic issue that so many believe; the end of growth is the start of the SHTF scenario in which we now find ourselves.  While this situation offers short term nirvana to investors, the economic repercussions are ultimately disastrous.

*  *  *

And so with that as background - and as noted above, a crisis that has been foreseeable on the horizon for years - it appears, based on a recently exposed United Nations report from the year 2000, that the 'new world order' envisioned a 'final solution' to this demographic dilemma of a collapsing consumer base for the west's credit-based economies...

The Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) has released a new report titled ?Replacement Migration: Is it a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations??. Replacement migration refers to the international migration that a country would need to prevent population decline and population ageing resulting from low fertility and mortality rates.


United Nations projections indicate that between 1995 and 2050, the population of Japan and virtually all countries of Europe will most likely decline. In a number of cases, including Estonia, Bulgaria and Italy, countries would lose between one quarter and one third of their population. Population ageing will be pervasive, bringing the median age of population to historically unprecedented high levels. For instance, in Italy, the median age will rise from 41 years in 2000 to 53 years in 2050. The potential support ratio -- i.e., the number of persons of working age (15-64 years) per older person -- will often be halved, from 4 or 5 to 2.


Focusing on these two striking and critical trends, the report examines in detail the case of eight low-fertility countries (France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, United Kingdom and United States) and two regions (Europe and the European Union). In each case, alternative scenarios for the period 1995-2050 are considered, highlighting the impact that various levels of immigration would have on population size and population ageing.


Major findings of this report include:

  • In the next 50 years, the populations of most developed countries are projected to become smaller and older as a result of low fertility and increased longevity. In contrast, the population of the United States is projected to increase by almost a quarter. Among the countries studied in the report, Italy is projected to register the largest population decline in relative terms, losing 28 per cent of its population between 1995 and 2050, according to the United Nations medium variant projections. The population of the European Union, which in 1995 was larger than that of the United States by 105 million, in 2050, will become smaller by 18 million.
  • Population decline is inevitable in the absence of replacement migration. Fertility may rebound in the coming decades, but few believe that it will recover sufficiently in most countries to reach replacement level in the foreseeable future.
  • Some immigration is needed to prevent population decline in all countries and regions examined in the report. However, the level of immigration in relation to past experience varies greatly. For the European Union, a continuation of the immigration levels observed in the 1990s would roughly suffice to prevent total population from declining, while for Europe as a whole, immigration would need to double. The Republic of Korea would need a relatively modest net inflow of migrants -- a major change, however, for a country which has been a net sender until now. Italy and Japan would need to register notable increases in net immigration. In contrast, France, the United Kingdom and the United States would be able to maintain their total population with fewer immigrants than observed in recent years.
  • The numbers of immigrants needed to prevent the decline of the total population are considerably larger than those envisioned by the United Nations projections. The only exception is the United States.
  • The numbers of immigrants needed to prevent declines in the working- age population are larger than those needed to prevent declines in total population. In some cases, such as the Republic of Korea, France, the United Kingdom or the United States, they are several times larger. If such flows were to occur, post-1995 immigrants and their descendants would represent a strikingly large share of the total population in 2050 -- between 30 and 39 per cent in the case of Japan, Germany and Italy.
  • Relative to their population size, Italy and Germany would need the largest number of migrants to maintain the size of their working-age populations. Italy would require 6,500 migrants per million inhabitants annually and Germany, 6,000. The United States would require the smallest number -- 1,300 migrants per million inhabitants per year.
  • The levels of migration needed to prevent population ageing are many times larger than the migration streams needed to prevent population decline. Maintaining potential support ratios would in all cases entail volumes of immigration entirely out of line with both past experience and reasonable expectations.
  • In the absence of immigration, the potential support ratios could be maintained at current levels by increasing the upper limit of the working-age population to roughly 75 years of age.
  • The new challenges of declining and ageing populations will require a comprehensive reassessment of many established policies and programmes, with a long-term perspective. Critical issues that need to be addressed include: (a) the appropriate ages for retirement; (b) the levels, types and nature of retirement and health care benefits for the elderly; (c) labour force participation; (d) the assessed amounts of contributions from workers and employers to support retirement and health care benefits for the elderly population; and (e) policies and programmes relating to international migration, in particular, replacement migration and the integration of large numbers of recent migrants and their descendants.

The problem with this cunning plan to immigrant-ize western nations to backfill the domestic demographic decline is that the immigrants - as a whole - are a drag on growth (via politically-correct benefits, extra policing, and border enforcements) as opposed to the economy-improving growth dynamos that the United Nations assumed any sentient-credit-consuming-being would be in the year 2000.

Even the world's richest man is starting to get the joke that the new world order's cunning plan is not working...

Europe will be devastated by African refugees if they don’t “make it more difficult for Africans to reach the continent,” and the solution lies in European nations committing billions of taxpayer money towards overseas aid.

According to Gates, the combination of explosive population growth in Africa combined with Europe’s notoriously generous open-border migrant welfare programs – as illustrated by the ‘German attitude to refugees’ have incentivised migrants to flood into Europe.

“On the one hand you want to demonstrate generosity and take in refugees, but the more generous you are, the more word gets around about this - which in turn motivates more people to leave Africa.


While Germany has been one of the pioneers of the open door policy, it cannot “take in the huge, massive number of people who are wanting to make their way to Europe.”


Thus Gates advised European nations to take action in order to make it “more difficult for Africans to reach the continent via the current transit routes.”

–Bill Gates


Son of Captain Nemo TBT or not TBT Mon, 07/24/2017 - 08:39 Permalink

You pay taxes to it and probably make white phosphorous and depleted uranium for the tanks and airplanes!...

The drunk driving is probably the single tear drop of guilt you have not for the killing of innocent men women and children but for your own failure in the larger project!

Do us all a favor and get hammered tonight and wrap your "bagel & lox" ass around a telephone pole doing 100 mph!!!

In reply to by TBT or not TBT

Chuck Walla yomutti2 Mon, 07/24/2017 - 07:28 Permalink

Well, the "PLAN" appears to be to make the entire world Detroit. Burn through all that white capital and then watch it burn and kill itself to extinction. Under the hand of Soros, Rothschilds, et al of course.  Has anyone got the Chinese on board yet? They seem to be able to populate quickly.

In reply to by yomutti2

Omen IV TBT or not TBT Sun, 07/23/2017 - 19:36 Permalink

Strategic Engineered Migration as a Weapon of War Kelly M. Greenhill  Study by the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at Harvard University that bears the name «Strategic Engineered Migration as a Weapon of War», which the author also uses for the title of this article. The study was first published in 2008 in the Civil Wars journal. Using a combination of statistical data and case study analysis, the author of the work, Kelly Greenhill, provides answers to the following questions: can refugees be a specific type of weapon, can this weapon only be used in wartime or in peacetime as well, and just how successful can its exploitation be? On the whole, Greenhill answers these questions in the affirmative. Cultural Marxist Agenda implemented in the EU & USA -  from Soros to Obama & Clinton 2007 Strategic Engineered Migration as a Weapon of War--Kelly M. Greenhill Political Control leads to Economic Subjugation of the indiginous population....NeoSerfdom = $1.00 per hour south of the border comes north ten years later as planned assuming Clinton ascension a new and different armament – i.e., the refugee as weapon – has entered the world's arsenals.  Using a combination of statistical data and case study analysis, this article tackles these questions and provides a detailed examination of the instrumental manipulation of population movements as political and military weapons of war. In addition to ‘mapping the terrain’ of the issue by providing a comprehensive typology of the most common means by – and desired ends for – which displaced persons have been used as political and military weapons

In reply to by TBT or not TBT

rbg81 TBT or not TBT Mon, 07/24/2017 - 08:05 Permalink

It takes a special kind of moron to believe that an African or Jihadi will just walk in and "replace" a native Westerner.  The people they are importing will just suck benefits and taxes from the native White population, making them even less likely to reproduce.  The stupidity is so strong, it must be some kind of purposeful plan.  As this strategy is guaranteed to Europe into Detroit, I cannot imagine what the benefit would be though.  Maybe the Globalists just want a dependent population who will always vote liberal so they can stay in power forever.  As long as they have their enclaves, they don't care how much of a shithole the rest of the world turns into.

In reply to by TBT or not TBT

CoonT Sun, 07/23/2017 - 19:12 Permalink

"Hey, we need a stronger, more robust and industrious workforce..... Let's bring in Arabs and North Africans"  Can't make this shit up.

The Wizard AlexCharting Sun, 07/23/2017 - 19:40 Permalink

What the the theory fails to recognize is the labor force of 2000 is not going to be the same as 2020. Technology and robots are increasingly doing more manufacturing. The number of jobs to be filled will be fewer in medium and low skill jobs which is where the illegals end up. Illegals do many dirty jobs Americans refuse to do, but technology is filling the void.The globalists know it is much easier to control a society that loses its culture with a divide and conquer application.

In reply to by AlexCharting

Golden Showers The Wizard Sun, 07/23/2017 - 23:57 Permalink

Awesome! All those refugees are gonna go over great in homogenous societies like Japan and South Korea. Shit, you can't even mix Japanes and Koreans. Not without a hello kitty fight of epic scale. So what is the big deal with population decline? Populations surge and decline. Why must they keep growing?Then if you notice, the memo talks about raising the retirement age to 75... Oh, so it's an economic thing? A tax thing?Let me stop you right there. Instead of going through the effort of moving entire populations from third world shit holes (albeit, probably very beautiful places) to countries with an eroding tax base to keep the bullshit bank system robbing us dead slaves on the high seas going...How about we smash the fucking banks to death scorched earth style and throw off the fucking chains for god's sake!Route them out, by god. Route them out.

In reply to by The Wizard

Creative_Destruct AlexCharting Sun, 07/23/2017 - 21:19 Permalink

There lies a major portion of the flaw in the UN demographic replacement argument: these masses of poorly educated immigrants are even more easily replaced by automation than the more educated native population.It will take DECADES, if ever, for them to become economically productive and for governments to tax net surpluses from them.These people will be a net DRAG on GDP for the foreseeable future.We and our progenie's SS and all of Europes social programs will NOT be paid for by these new arrivals.Quit the opposite; the immigrants themselves will be on the dole. They will likely drag us all down even faster.

In reply to by AlexCharting

Golden Showers Creative_Destruct Mon, 07/24/2017 - 00:16 Permalink

Can anyone tell me this, Does Ngowa Tuk Tuk from Malindi, Kenya have a birth certificate? Can someone call Obama and ask that fool?You cannot make broke ass busters into shit in half a generation. But you can get their massive broods setup with live stock receipts and start maxing out those credit lines per protocol. I always knew "they" were saving Africa for as much exploitation as possible. In the day I thought it would make a great market for The Footlocker and shit like that. Now it's in reverse. Just take them niggers to Europe redux to be slaves all over again in reverse. What a fucking world!Shit, if I was over there I'd be telling my wife's brother to take his whole family to the Europe. I'd kick it at home with more goats and shit. Ballin'

In reply to by Creative_Destruct