GAO Fail: Phony Fed Audit Fails to Reveal BlackRock & Jamie Dimon's Dirty Secret

@Nouriel, enough with the pro-Fed propaganda already.

Reposted with permission from

We recently revealed that the Government "Accountability" Office audit of the Fed's emergency practices during the financial panic (which caused so much consternation even in watered down form) was a complete whitewash. In its review of the Fed's outsourcing practices, the GAO failed to mention the most damaging and suspicious sole-source (no bid) contract awarded to BlackRock, which was for managing the New York Fed's toxic Bear Stearns portfolio, otherwise known as Maiden Lane. This contract would generate $108,000,000 in fees and was one of the largest awarded during the bailout period, but it might also have saved JP Morgan $1.1 billion in losses from its Bear Stearns acquisition.

A key finding from the GAO report related to the noncompetitive award of contracts to third parties, particularly by the New York Fed (emphasis ours):
The Reserve Banks, primarily FRBNY, awarded 103 contracts worth $659.4 million from 2008 through 2010 to help carry out their emergency lending activities. A few contracts accounted for most of the spending on vendor services. The Reserve Banks relied more on vendors more extensively for programs that provided assistance to single institutions than for broad-based programs. Most of the contracts, including 8 of the 10 highest-value contracts, were awarded noncompetitively due to exigent circumstances as permitted under FRBNY’s acquisition policies.
The report also stated there was a total of three sole-source contracts awarded, and the GAO went out of its way to highlight the reason for two of them:
For example, FRBNY noncompetitively selected BlackRock as the investment manager for Maiden Lanes II and III because BlackRock had already evaluated the underlying assets pursuant to an engagement with AIG prior to the extension of credit by FRBNY.
Yet, amazingly (or not so), the GAO failed to disclose that BlackRock had no similar experience with the Bear Stearns portfolio (the original Maiden Lane). According to [now] Vice President Sarah Dahlgren of the New York Fed, there was no "clear reason" for BlackRock to be awarded the management rights on a noncompetitive basis. We know this because of internal emails, which were subpoenaed by Congress pursuant to its investigation of the Fed's bailout of AIG (emphasis ours):
To Sarah Dahlgren/NY/FRS@FRS
Re: Sole Source
Spent some time with him [Tom Baxter, Jr., FRBNY GC] tonight. (He doesn't understand ML3, and I can't begin explain it either -- so don't needle him! -- and I am going to have [Paul] Whynott [FRBNY VP] spend some time with him tomorrow, BTW, you might touch base with Joyce [Hansen, FRBNY Deputy GC] about her reaction to Sunday's briefing; I think she had some concerns about how ML3 was presented to Geithner, which she expressed to Paul.) [Geithner] knew that Stephanie [Heller, FRBNY Asst. GC] was handling the Blackrock contract -- he didn't express any concerns -- and I explained that, in contrast to MLI, we had a clear reason to sole source it this time (that they had already modeled, etc.). So, although I have no worries, yes, probably worth reviewing it with him [Geithner] before taking it to Tom."
As to the New York Fed's guidelines on third party contracts, the GAO notes (emphasis ours):
FRBNY awarded contracts in accordance with its acquisition policy, which applied to all services associated with the emergency programs and single-institution assistance. FRBNY is a private corporation created by statute and is not subject to the FAR. Instead, FRBNY developed its own acquisition policy, called Operating Bulletin 10.
According to the New York Fed's Operating Bulletin 10, sole-source contracts require approval at the highest levels (emphasis ours):
4.3 Exceptions to Competitive Acquisitions
A. Procedures other than competitive solicitations or small purchase procedures may be used in the following circumstances. The Contract Representative should draft a memorandum with sufficient supporting documentation to justify the use of the exception to acquisition procedures, and obtain the approval of a senior officer (Vice President or higher). The approving senior officer must have the appropriate level of signing authority, pursuant to Operating Bulletin No. 2, for the expected dollar expenditure. A copy of both the approval memorandum and senior officer approval should be placed in the acquisition file of the Contract Representative area and forwarded to the Procurement Division as the central repository for contract information.Contracts in excess of $500,000 that are not competitively bid must be approved by the Bank’s Board of Directors pursuant to Operating Bulletin No. 2.
1. Sole Source. The property or services are available from only one responsible supplier and no other type of property or services will satisfy the Bank’s needs.
(1) A sole-source acquisition involves no competition and should be utilized only when justified and necessary to serve Bank needs. A sole-source award should generally be made only where no other source of supply is available.
In short, the approval of the $108 million BlackRock contract had to be approved by both a senior officer at the New York Fed and its Board of Directors due to the size of the contract. And just who comprised the board at the time?
STEPHEN FRIEDMAN, Chair and Federal Reserve Agent
Stone Point Capital, LLC, Greenwich, Conn.
DENIS M. HUGHES, Deputy Chair
New York State AFL-CIO, New York, N.Y.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
JPMorgan Chase & Co., New York, N.Y.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
General Electric Company, Fairfield, Conn.
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman
The Adirondack Trust Company, Saratoga Springs, N.Y.
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
Popular, Inc., San Juan, P.R.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
PepsiCo, Inc., Purchase, N.Y.
Columbia University, New York, N.Y.
Notably, ex-Goldman Sachs Chairman, Stephen Friedman, would later resign in disgrace after it was learned that he was loading up on shares of his former employer (Goldman) as it was receiving overt and covert bailouts from the very same New York Fed through the various emergency lending facilities.
And while the contract amount of $108 million might seem like peanuts in light of the billions being thrown around at the time, BlackRock might have served another function by becoming investment manager for Maiden Lane. As we wrote in June, 2010, BlackRock ended up heavily trading the MBS portion of ML, which had been sold to the public as a vehicle to simply unwind Bear Stearn's toxic assets. So much so, that MBS trading profits papered over the substantial losses in the RMBS and loan sections of the portfolio. While the New York Fed had loaned ML approximately $28.8 billion to purchase the portfolio, JP Morgan ponied up a cool $1.1 billion of its own, and was last in line to be paid if there were losses.
Also, BlackRock was also one of the managers of the NY Fed's separate $1.25 trillion MBS purchase program as part of QE1. Contrary to the lie on the NY Fed's webpage (that the MBS auctions were conducted via competitive bidding), the NY Fed's own purchasing manager, Brian Sack, admitted in a paper that, "the MBS purchases were arranged with primary dealer counterparties directly, [and] there was no auction mechanism to provide a measure of market supply."
Putting it all together, it looks like Jamie Dimon signed off on hiring BlackRock for no justifiable reason to trade the very Maiden Lane portfolio that could have caused his bank, JP Morgan Chase, to lose up to $1.1 billion. And, it was entirely possible that BlackRock saved the portfolio by trading the MBS portion of ML with the New York Fed directly as QE1 was underway.
Unfortunately, the GAO's work product is not subject to public request, but it can be compelled to be released by Congress. The next time Congress decides to subpoena the Fed, or Bloomberg decides to file a FOIA, they might request the acquisition file for the BlackRock Maiden Lane contract containing the officer approval and justification notes, as well as the minutes of the director meeting with Friedman, Dimon, Immelt et al.
If one guy with nothing more than a laptop and an internet connection could find all this, we are left to wonder what other elephants the GAO ignored during its field trip to 33 Liberty Street.