Iran-Backed & US Occupation Forces Currently Battling In Eastern Syria, Reports Of Casualties
Update(20:00ET): US forces occupying Syria's northeast are in a high state of alert, and there are reports of ongoing gunbattles with Iran-backed militias into the night hours. It's being widely acknowledged as the most serious fighting involving American forces there since 2019, with some of the latest rocket launches targeting Omar oil field, which has long been held by US and Kurdish forces.
"The conflict in northeast Syria escalated on Friday as Iran-backed militias launched a volley of rocket and drone attacks against coalition bases after American reprisals for a drone attack that killed a U.S. contractor and injured six other Americans," The New York Times reports late in the day Friday.
🔴📹 #Syria- Iran-backed militias targeted the Conico US military base at the Omar oil field east of Deir ez-Zor in Syria with at least 20 rockets.— Mete Sohtaoğlu (@metesohtaoglu) March 24, 2023
American warplanes entered areas under the control of the Assad regime.
Via @savunmaisleri pic.twitter.com/VOzba42H2I
The Pentagon claims the flare-up in fighting began the prior night with a drone attack which detonated at a US base. US officials called the self-destructive drone of “Iranian origin" - which resulted in rare American casualties.
The White House then authorized a series of major airstrikes utilizing its aircraft out of Qatar. There were reports of fatalities and casualties among Syrian Army as well as allied Iranian troops as well.
#BREAKING: US forces and pro-Iranian forces currently battling in Eastern Syria.— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) March 24, 2023
This follows the US airstrike yesterday, in retaliation to a drone attack by Iranian-backed forces.
Pro-Iranian forces have been placed on High Alert following their attacks on 3 US military bases… pic.twitter.com/dIJJrMvPSY
Biden addressed the fighting while visiting PM Justin Trudeau in Ottawa. "Make no mistake, the United States does not, does not, I emphasize, seek conflict with Iran." He added: "But be prepared for us to act forcefully to protect our people. That’s exactly what happened last night."
US officials have acknowledge to the Times that there was some kind of failure in the base's anti-air systems:
Two U.S. officials said the main air defense system at the base was “not fully operational” at the time, raising questions about whether the attackers had detected that vulnerability and exploited it, or just happened to send the drone at that time, according to people who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the investigation.
BREAKING NEWS: US bases directly targeted by drones and missiles in oil rich northeast Syria.— The Cradle (@TheCradleMedia) March 24, 2023
Casualties reported among the US forces. pic.twitter.com/eqyST5Bhzj
As for the raging overnight fight currently said to be unfolding, few details have emerged as to potential casualties on either side. The timing is interesting politically given the Saudi-Iran rapprochement, as well a recent failed push by Congress members to force the Biden White House to pull troops out of Syria.
The best way to protect U.S. personnel is to bring them home. They are not authorized to be in Syria. Stop these endless occupations and wars. https://t.co/Db3ChgHjGa— Justin Amash (@justinamash) March 24, 2023
* * *
The United States struck Iranian-linked groups in Syria on Thursday after a US contractor was killed and five military service members and another US contractor were wounded in a purported drone strike.
The Pentagon said the US casualties were suffered on a base near Hasakah in the northeast part of the country, when a "one-way, unmanned, aerial vehicle" hit a maintenance facility at 1:38 pm local time. The statement said intelligence assessed the drone to be "of Iranian origin."
Three service members and the surviving U.S. contractor were medically evacuated to military medical facilities in Iraq. Two service members were treated at the base. No details were provided about which military branches the service members were affiliated with, nor the identity of the contractors.
"At the direction of President Biden, I authorized U.S. Central Command forces to conduct precision airstrikes tonight in eastern Syria against facilities used by groups affiliated with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC)," said Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III in a statement. "The airstrikes were conducted in response to today’s attack as well as a series of recent attacks against Coalition forces in Syria by groups affiliated with the IRGC."
The violence came on the same day as reports that Syria and Saudi Arabia are on the brink of fully restoring diplomatic relations -- to include reopening embassies. As we wrote just yesterday:
It seems the Gulf has been willing to recognize that the Syrian government won the decade-long war and move on, but not Washington. The US has continued its military occupation of northern Syria, and Israel has extended its bombing campaign, even this week with strikes on Aleppo international airport.
The violence also comes alongside a Chinese-brokered rapprochement between Saudi Arabia and Iran, which will see the long-time archrivals restore full diplomacy. An aide to Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, disappointed over the prospect of more peaceful relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran, said it was the result of American "weakness."
In August of last year, US helicopters attacked Iranian-linked militants in Syria after rockets were fired at US bases.
In separate statement on Thursday's events, US Central Command said, "Our troops remain in Syria to ensure the enduring defeat of ISIS, which benefits the security and stability of not only Syria, but the entire region."
To keep the wheat and oil out of the hands of the government and its allies. Oh, I mean protect our allies the Kurds from our allies the Turks and fight ISIS and their enemies, Iran.— Scott Horton (@scotthortonshow) March 24, 2023
Officially, about 900 US service members are deployed in Syria, against the wishes of the Syrian government. The presence dates back to 2015, with successive administrations claiming the deployments are legal under the aging 2001 and 2002 Authorizations for Use of Military Force (AUMFs). The first authorized force against the perpetrators of 9/11, and the second authorized the disastrous invasion of Iraq.
Earlier this month, the House rejected a resolution that would have directed President Biden to withdraw U.S. troops within 180 days. Introduced by Florida Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz, it failed in a 103-321 vote. Both the yea and nay votes were highly bipartisan; 56 Democrats joined 47 Republicans in calling for troops to leave.
In a 9-86 vote on Wednesday, the Senate killed an amendment offered by Sen. Rand Paul that would have put a six-month sunset on the 2001 AUMF. "No one in Congress in 2001 believed they were voting for a decades-long war fought in at least 19 countries," wrote Paul at Responsible Statecraft, noting that the six-month window would give Congress time to debate "where and how to authorize force."