Robinhood Faces SEC Probe For Misleading Customers About HFTs Frontrunning Their Orders

Tyler Durden's Photo
by Tyler Durden
Wednesday, Sep 02, 2020 - 03:52 PM

A few weeks ago, we published an amusing account of how the Ken Griffin-owned HFT firm Citadel sicced its army of white-shoe lawyers on Zero Hedge after we dared to explain to our audience exactly why RobinHood - and now its discount brokerage predecessors, all of whom have followed RH's lead and abandoned trading fees - can afford to charge its clients nothing: Because the company takes all of that retail order flow and auctions it off to the highest HFT bidder, enabling them to profit by - and we want to be very careful with our language here - "trading ahead of customer orders," a practice otherwise known as "front-running". A few days later, FINRA fined Citadel for, you know, frontrunning its clients; we haven't heard from Citadel's lawyers since.

Not that anyone cared: with so many mom-and-pop traders parlaying their stimulus checks and enhanced unemployment benefits in the stock market, our warnings were promptly ignored (hardly a surprise - nobody cares when stocks keep going up).

But as the S&P 500 roars to yet another record high - accompanied this time by a disconcerting rebound in the VIX - WSJ reports that the SEC is almost ready to slap Robinhood with a $10 million fine for failing to disclose to its customers exactly how their order flow would be packaged and sold to the HFT firms.

To be sure, a deal likely won't come this month - and the fraud investigation is 'civil' in nature.

Of course, as one twitter user pointed out, the fine is just another slap on the wrist, before everybody carries on with business as usual.

That is, until the music stops.